Embodiments relate generally to computer data systems, and more particularly, to methods, systems and computer readable media for computer data distribution architecture for efficient plotting data synchronization using remote query processors.
Some conventional computer data systems may maintain data in one or more data sources that may include data objects such as tables. These conventional systems may include clients that access tables from each data source to create visualizations of the data. In such data systems, a need may exist to provide systems and methods for efficient synchronization of dynamically changing plotting data, in order to reduce memory usage of an individual client and to enable redundancy, high-availability, scalability, and allow parallelization of plotting processing across multiple clients. In such data systems, a need may also exist to enable local modification of plots without having to contact a server in order to provide more responsive user interactions and to minimize communications with the server.
Embodiments were conceived in light of the above mentioned needs, problems and/or limitations, among other things.
Some implementations (first implementations) include a computer database system, one or more processors, and computer readable storage coupled to the one or more processors. The computer readable storage can have stored thereon instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations. The operations can include receiving, at a remote query processor, a plot command to generate a plot at a client computer, the plot command referencing a first object, the first object being updatable by propagating updates through an update propagation graph associated with the first object. The operations can include generating, at the remote query processor, a plotting data structure comprising an export object handle referencing at least a portion of the first object. The operations can include transmitting, at the remote query processor, one or more messages to the client computer, the one or more messages comprising the plotting data structure and an initial snapshot of the first object. The operations can include automatically subscribing, at the remote query processor, the client computer to receive consistent updates to the first object. The operations can include receiving, at the client computer, the one or more messages comprising the plotting data structure and the initial snapshot from the remote query processor. The operations can include creating, at the client computer, a second object to represent a replica of the portion of the first object referenced by the export object handle. The operations can include storing, at the client computer, the initial snapshot as the replica of the portion of the first object referenced by the export object handle. The operations can include assigning, at the client computer, the replica as an input to a figure to be displayed in a graphical user interface. The operations can include generating, at the client computer, a graphical figure comprising the plot based on the plotting data structure and the replica of the portion of the first object referenced by the export object handle. The operations can include adding at the remote query processor a first listener to the update propagation graph as a dependent of the first object. The operations can include receiving, at the first listener, an update notification indicating an update to the first object. The operations can include sending, by the remote query processor, a notification to the client computer including an indication of the change to the first object and a copy of any changed data. The operations can include, responsive to receiving the notification at the client computer, updating the replica of the portion of the first object referenced by the export object handle. The operations can include updating, at the client computer, the graphical figure comprising the plot based on the plotting data structure and the updated replica of the portion of the first object referenced by the export object handle.
In some first implementations, the plotting data structure comprises the initial snapshot. In some first implementations, the operations can further include: receiving, at the client computer, a request for the graphical figure from a remote computer; and transmitting, at the client computer, the graphical figure in an image format to the remote computer. In some first implementations, the image format is selected from a group consisting of JPEG, GIF, PNG, SVG, and PDF. In some first implementations, the updating the graphical figure is performed after at least a portion of the graphical figure is visible in the graphical user interface. In some first implementations, the updating the graphical figure is throttled such that the updating is performed as part of a batch update. In some first implementations, the plotting data structure comprises a second export object handle referencing a second object to define an attribute of the plot. In some first implementations, the first object is a table and the export object handle is an export table handle. In some first implementations, the operations further include determining that the graphical figure is not being displayed by the client computer, and, responsive to the determining that the graphical figure is not being displayed, setting a mode of the plot to a sleep mode. In some first implementations, the sleep mode ignores or prevents redraw events for the plot.
Some implementations (second implementations) include a method that can include receiving, at a remote query processor, a plot command to generate a plot at a client computer, the plot command referencing a first object, the first object being updatable by propagating updates through an update propagation graph associated with the first object. The method can include generating, at the remote query processor, a plotting data structure comprising an export object handle referencing at least a portion of the first object. The method can include transmitting, at the remote query processor, one or more messages to the client computer, the one or more messages comprising the plotting data structure and an initial snapshot of the first object. The method can include receiving, at the client computer, the one or more messages comprising the plotting data structure and the initial snapshot from the remote query processor. The method can include creating, at the client computer, a second object to represent a replica of the portion of the first object referenced by the export object handle. The method can include storing, at the client computer, the initial snapshot as the replica of the portion of the first object referenced by the export object handle. The method can include assigning, at the client computer, the replica as an input to a figure to be displayed in a graphical user interface. The method can include generating, at the client computer, a graphical figure comprising the plot based on the plotting data structure and the replica of the portion of the first object referenced by the export object handle. The method can include adding at the remote query processor a first listener to the update propagation graph as a dependent of the first object. The method can include receiving, at the first listener, an update notification indicating an update to the first object. The method can include sending, by the remote query processor, a notification to the client computer including an indication of the change to the first object and a copy of any changed data. The method can include, responsive to receiving the notification at the client computer, updating the replica of the portion of the first object referenced by the export object handle. The method can include updating, at the client computer, the graphical figure comprising the plot based on the plotting data structure and the updated replica of the portion of the first object referenced by the export object handle.
In some second implementations, the plotting data structure comprises the initial snapshot. In some second implementations, the method can further include: receiving, at the client computer, a request for the graphical figure from a remote computer; and transmitting, at the client computer, the graphical figure in an image format to the remote computer. In some second implementations, the image format is selected from a group consisting of JPEG, GIF, PNG, SVG, and PDF. In some second implementations, the updating the graphical figure is performed after at least a portion of the graphical figure is visible in the graphical user interface. In some second implementations, the updating the graphical figure is throttled such that the updating is performed as part of a batch update. In some second implementations, the plotting data structure comprises a second export object handle referencing a second object to define an attribute of the plot. In some second implementations, the method further comprising automatically subscribing, at the remote query processor, the client computer to receive consistent updates to the first object. In some second implementations, the first object is a table and the export object handle is an export table handle. In some second implementations, the method further includes determining that the graphical figure is not being displayed by the client computer, and responsive to the determining that the graphical figure is not being displayed, setting a mode of the plot to a sleep mode. In some second implementations, the sleep mode stops updates to the first object from being received.
Some implementations (third implementations) include a nontransitory computer readable medium having stored thereon software instructions that, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations. The operations can include receiving, at a remote query processor, a plot command to generate a plot at a client computer, the plot command referencing a first object, the first object being updatable by propagating updates through an update propagation graph associated with the first object. The operations can include generating, at the remote query processor, a plotting data structure comprising an export object handle referencing at least a portion of the first object. The operations can include transmitting, at the remote query processor, one or more messages to the client computer, the one or more messages comprising the plotting data structure and an initial snapshot of the first object. The operations can include receiving, at the client computer, the one or more messages comprising the plotting data structure and the initial snapshot from the remote query processor. The operations can include creating, at the client computer, a second object to represent a replica of the portion of the first object referenced by the export object handle. The operations can include storing, at the client computer, the initial snapshot as the replica of the portion of the first object referenced by the export object handle. The operations can include assigning, at the client computer, the replica as an input to a figure to be displayed in a graphical user interface. The operations can include generating, at the client computer, a graphical figure comprising the plot based on the plotting data structure and the replica of the portion of the first object referenced by the export object handle. The operations can include adding at the remote query processor a first listener to the update propagation graph as a dependent of the first object. The operations can include receiving, at the first listener, an update notification indicating an update to the first object. The operations can include sending, by the remote query processor, a notification to the client computer including an indication of the change to the first object and a copy of any changed data. The operations can include, responsive to receiving the notification at the client computer, updating the replica of the portion of the first object referenced by the export object handle. The operations can include updating, at the client computer, the graphical figure comprising the plot based on the plotting data structure and the updated replica of the portion of the first object referenced by the export object handle.
In some third implementations, the plotting data structure comprises the initial snapshot. In some third implementations, the operations also include receiving, at the client computer, a request for the graphical figure from a remote computer, and, transmitting, at the client computer, the graphical figure in an image format to the remote computer in response to the request from the remote computer. In some third implementations, the updating the graphical figure is performed only when at least a portion of the graphical figure is visible in the graphical user interface. In some third implementations, the updating the graphical figure is throttled such that the updating is performed as part of a batch update. In some third implementations, the plotting data structure comprises a second export object handle referencing a second object to define an attribute of the plot. In some third implementations, the operations also include automatically subscribing, at the remote query processor, the client computer to receive consistent updates to the first object. In some third implementations, the first object is a table and the export object handle is an export table handle. In some third implementations, the operations also include determining that the graphical figure is not being displayed by the client computer, and, responsive to the determining that the graphical figure is not being displayed, setting a mode of the plot to a sleep mode.
Reference may be made herein to the Java programming language, Java classes, Java bytecode and the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) for purposes of illustrating example implementations. It will be appreciated that implementations can include other programming languages (e.g., groovy, Scala, R, Go, etc.), other programming language structures as an alternative to or in addition to Java classes (e.g., other language classes, objects, data structures, program units, code portions, script portions, etc.), other types of bytecode, object code and/or executable code, and/or other virtual machines or hardware implemented machines configured to execute a data system query.
The application host 102 can include one or more application processes 112, one or more log files 114 (e.g., sequential, row-oriented log files), one or more data log tailers 116 and a multicast key-value publisher 118. The periodic data import host 104 can include a local table data server, direct or remote connection to a periodic table data store 122 (e.g., a column-oriented table data store) and a data import server 120. The query server host 106 can include a multicast key-value subscriber 126, a performance table logger 128, local table data store 130 and one or more remote query processors (132, 134) each accessing one or more respective tables (136, 138). The long-term file server 108 can include a long-term data store 140. The user data import host 110 can include a remote user table server 142 and a user table data store 144. Row-oriented log files and column-oriented table data stores are discussed herein for illustration purposes and are not intended to be limiting. It will be appreciated that log files and/or data stores may be configured in other ways. In general, any data stores discussed herein could be configured in a manner suitable for a contemplated implementation.
In operation, the input data application process 112 can be configured to receive input data from a source (e.g., a securities trading data source), apply schema-specified, generated code to format the logged data as it's being prepared for output to the log file 114 and store the received data in the sequential, row-oriented log file 114 via an optional data logging process. In some implementations, the data logging process can include a daemon, or background process task, that is configured to log raw input data received from the application process 112 to the sequential, row-oriented log files on disk and/or a shared memory queue (e.g., for sending data to the multicast publisher 118). Logging raw input data to log files can additionally serve to provide a backup copy of data that can be used in the event that downstream processing of the input data is halted or interrupted or otherwise becomes unreliable.
A data log tailer 116 can be configured to access the sequential, row-oriented log file(s) 114 to retrieve input data logged by the data logging process. In some implementations, the data log tailer 116 can be configured to perform strict byte reading and transmission (e.g., to the data import server 120). The data import server 120 can be configured to store the input data into one or more corresponding data stores such as the periodic table data store 122 in a column-oriented configuration. The periodic table data store 122 can be used to store data that is being received within a time period (e.g., a minute, an hour, a day, etc.) and which may be later processed and stored in a data store of the long-term file server 108. For example, the periodic table data store 122 can include a plurality of data servers configured to store periodic securities trading data according to one or more characteristics of the data (e.g., a data value such as security symbol, the data source such as a given trading exchange, etc.).
The data import server 120 can be configured to receive and store data into the periodic table data store 122 in such a way as to provide a consistent data presentation to other parts of the system. Providing/ensuring consistent data in this context can include, for example, recording logged data to a disk or memory, ensuring rows presented externally are available for consistent reading (e.g., to help ensure that if the system has part of a record, the system has all of the record without any errors), and preserving the order of records from a given data source. Consistent data can also include a view of the data that is internally consistent for a given instant (e.g. a consistent data snapshot at a given instant). If data is presented to clients, such as a remote query processor (132, 134), then the data may be persisted in some fashion (e.g., written to disk).
The local table data server 124 can be configured to retrieve data stored in the periodic table data store 122 and provide the retrieved data to one or more remote query processors (132, 134) via an optional proxy (e.g., table data cache proxy (TDCP) 394 and/or 404 as shown in
The remote user table server (RUTS) 142 can include a centralized consistent data writer, as well as a data server that provides processors with consistent access to the data that it is responsible for managing. For example, users can provide input to the system by writing table data that is then consumed by query processors.
The remote query processors (132, 134) can use data from the data import server 120, local table data server 124 and/or from the long-term file server 108 to perform queries. The remote query processors (132, 134) can also receive data from the multicast key-value subscriber 126, which receives data from the multicast key-value publisher 118 in the application host 102. The performance table logger 128 can log performance information about each remote query processor and its respective queries into a local table data store 130. Further, the remote query processors can also read data from the RUTS, from local table data written by the performance logger, or from user table data read over NFS, for example.
It will be appreciated that the configuration shown in
The production client host 202 can include a batch query application 212 (e.g., a query that is executed from a command line interface or the like) and a real time query data consumer process 214 (e.g., an application that connects to and listens to tables created from the execution of a separate query). The batch query application 212 and the real time query data consumer 214 can connect to a remote query dispatcher 222 and one or more remote query processors (224, 226) within the query server host 1208.
The controller host 204 can include a persistent query controller 216 configured to connect to a remote query dispatcher 232 and one or more remote query processors 228-230. In some implementations, the persistent query controller 216 can serve as the “primary client” for persistent queries and can request remote query processors from dispatchers, and send instructions to start persistent queries. For example, a user can submit a query to 216, and 216 starts and runs the query every day. In another example, a securities trading strategy could be a persistent query. The persistent query controller can start the trading strategy query every morning before the market opened, for instance. It will be appreciated that 216 can work on times other than days. In some implementations, the controller may require its own clients to request that queries be started, stopped, etc. This can be done manually, or scheduled (e.g., cron jobs). Some implementations can include “advanced scheduling” (e.g., auto-start/stop/restart, time-based repeat, etc.) within the controller.
The GUI/host workstation can include a user console 218 and a user query application 220. The user console 218 can be configured to connect to the persistent query controller 216. The user query application 220 can be configured to connect to one or more remote query dispatchers (e.g., 232) and one or more remote query processors (228, 230).
In operation, the processor 302 may execute the application 310 stored in the memory 306. The application 310 can include software instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform operations for efficient distribution and synchronization of plotting processing and data in accordance with the present disclosure (e.g., performing one or more of 402-426, 502-526, and/or 902-922 described below).
The application program 310 can operate in conjunction with the data section 312 and the operating system 304.
At 404, the client transmits the script to a query processor. The client and query processor can be running on the same or different hardware. For example, the client can transmit the script to a query processor remote from the client. In another example, the client and query processor could be running on the same hardware. Processing continues to 406.
At 406, the query processor received the script and determines that the script includes a plot command to display a plot at the client. Processing continues to 408.
At 408, the query processor generates a preemptive table to store data to be used by the client to display the plot. In some embodiments, more than one preemptive table can be used to display a plot as shown, for example, in
At 410, the query processor generates a plot object that includes plot information including an export table handle for the preemptive table and/or plotting parameters. Processing continues to 412.
At 412, the query processor transmits the plot object to the client. Processing continues to 414 and/or 418.
At 414, the client receives the plot object and uses the exported table handle to create a local copy of the preemptive table, including creating a listener and subscribing to receive consistent updates to the preemptive table from the query processor at the listener. In some embodiments, the client receiving the plot object can be different than the client at 402 and 404 (e.g., a first client can configure a plot that a second client can retrieve) (e.g., a client can connect to a persistent query, receive a list of available plots already available for that persistent query, and receive a plot object for one or more of the plots already available for that the persistent query). Processing continues to 416.
At 416, the client generates a plot based on the local copy of the preemptive table. In some embodiments, the client can generate an image of the plot and store the image of the plot. In some such embodiments, the image can be stored for distribution via a network such as a public network (e.g., the Internet) or a private network (e.g., an intranet).
At 418, the query processor processes update(s) to the preemptive table. Processing continues to 420.
At 420, the query processor sends updates to the client. Processing continues to 422.
At 422, the client updates the local copy of the preemptive table. Processing continues to 424.
At 424, the client determines whether the plot generated at 416 should be redrawn/updated. If so, processing continues 426.
At 426, the client redraws/updates the plot. In some embodiments the client can create/redraw/update the plot using an appropriate framework such as, for example, JFreeChart by Object Refinery Limited, Orson Charts by Object Refinery Limited, and/or Highcharts by Highsoft.
It will be appreciated that, although not shown, the subscribing client can cancel their subscription to stop receiving updates from the query processor, and that the TDCP may cancel its own data subscriptions and/or discard data it no longer needs for any RQP. It will also be appreciated that, although not shown, the subscribing client can cancel or pause updates when a plot is not “in view” in a graphical user interface (GUI) of the client (e.g., the plot is in a tab or window that is not active and/or not in the foreground or some other GUI element is preventing the plot from being displayed it the GUI) to reduce network traffic and reduce client replotting/redrawing processing (and can resume/restart updates when the plot is again viewable in the GUI).
It will also be appreciated that 402-422 may be repeated in whole or in part. For example, 418-420 may be repeated to provide the synchronized client with consistent updates to the preemptive table.
In some embodiments, a client can connect to an existing persistent query and the persistent query can provide a list of plots, tables, and other widgets that can be displayed. In such embodiments, 402-406 do not need to be performed and the client can select a widget from the list associated with the persistent query and info on the selected widget can be sent to the client, and the widget can be drawn.
At 504, RQP generates an export table handle for table X and automatically establishes a subscription for Client to receive consistent updates to table X from RQP. Processing continues to 510 and/or 514.
At 510, Client receives the table handle and an initial data snapshot from RQP and stores the initial data snapshot in a table X′ (e.g., table X′ in
At 512, Client creates a listener 2 to receive consistent updates to table X from RQP (e.g., although not shown, X′ in
At 514, worker 1 creates a listener 1 and adds listener 1 to the DAG defining table X_export as a dependent of table X in the DAG structure (e.g., although not shown, X_export in
At 516, listener 1 receives an AMDR notification of an update to table X, creates a changed data snapshot, and sends an AMDR notification and the changed data snapshot to worker 2. Processing continues to 418.
At 518, RQP receives notification at listener 2 of an update to table X, the notification including an AMDR message and a changed data snapshot when data has changed. Processing continues to 520.
At 520, RQP applies the changes to table X′. Processing continues to 522.
At 522, Client can propagate the AMDR changes to dependents of table X′ to process changes through one or more DAGs of Client that include table X′. In some embodiments, Client uses a locking mechanism when performing 518, 520, 522, 524, and 526 to ensure that changes are applied to table X′ and its dependents in a consistent manner, and to provide synchronization between such updates to table X′ and plot redraws/updates (e.g., GUI redraws), as shown for example, in FIG. 9 of the '127 application.
It will be appreciated that, although not shown, the subscribing Client can cancel their subscription to stop receiving updates from RQP, and that the TDCP may cancel its own data subscriptions and/or discard data it no longer needs for any RQP. For example, Client can cancel its subscription to table X when the associated plot is no longer being displayed.
It will also be appreciated that 502-526 may be repeated in whole or in part. For example, 516-524/526 may be repeated to continue providing Client with consistent updates to table X so that Client can continue to update/redraw the plot.
Although DAG 602 in
In
Data sources can include market data (e.g., data received via multicast distribution mechanism or through a tailer), system generated data, historical data, user input data from the remote user table server, tables programmatically generated in-memory, or something further upstream in the DAG. In general, anything represented in the data system as an object (e.g., a table) and which can refresh itself/provide data can be a data source. Also, data sources can include non-table data structures which update, for example, mathematical data structures. For example, B=A.sumBy(“GroupCol”), where this creates a summation aggregation of table A as a new table B. The table B would then get updated when A changes as described, for example, in the '127 application. Similarly, minimum, maximum, variance, average, standard deviation, first, last, by, etc. aggregations can be supported, such as, for example, t5=t4.stdBy(“GroupCol”), where this creates a standard deviation aggregation of table t4 as a new table t5.
In some implementations, code can be converted into the in-memory data structures holding the DAG. For example, the source code of
In some implementations, when a table changes, an application programming interface (API) can specify, for example, rows where add, modify, delete, or reindex (AMDR) changes were made. A reindex is a change in which a row is moved but the value contained in the row is not modified. The API can also provide a mechanism to obtain a value prior to the most recent change. When the DAG is processed during the refresh, the AMDR info on “upstream” data objects (e.g., tables, etc.) or nodes can be used to compute changes in “downstream” data objects or nodes. In some implementations, the entire DAG can be processed during the refresh cycle.
In general, a DAG can be comprised of a) dynamic nodes (DN); b) static nodes (SN); and c) internal nodes (IN) that can include nodes with DN and/or SN and/or IN as inputs.
DNs are nodes of the graph that can change. For example, DN can be data sources that update as new data comes in. DN could also be timers that trigger an event based on time intervals. In other examples, DN could also be MySQL monitors, specialized filtering criteria (e.g., update a “where” filter only when a certain event happens). Because these nodes are “sources”, they may occur as root nodes in the DAG. At the most fundamental level, DN are root DAG nodes which change (e.g., are “alive”).
SNs are nodes of the DAG that do not change. For example, historical data does not change. IN are interior nodes of the DAG. The state of an IN can be defined by its inputs, which can be DN, SN, and or IN. If all of the IN inputs are “static”, the IN will be static. If one or more of the IN inputs is “dynamic”, the IN will be dynamic. IN can be tables or other data structures. For example, a “listener IN” can permit code to listen to a node of the DAG. A listener node or associated listener monitoring code can place (or “fire”) additional events (or notifications) into a priority queue of a DAG.
In general, a DAG can be composed of static and/or dynamic subgraphs. In some implementations, update processing occurs on dynamic subgraphs (because static subgraphs are not changing). In some such implementations, only dynamic nodes are in the DataMonitor loop. For Tables, change notification messages such as, for example, AMDR messages can be used for communication within the DAG.
When query code is executed, the DAG is created or modified. As part of this process, the system records the order in which the DAG nodes were constructed in. This “construction ordering” can be used to determine the order that nodes are processed in the DAG.
For example, consider:
Assume (a) has changes to be processed during a refresh cycle. The order of processing will be (a), (b), (c), and then (d).
When (d) is processed, it will process input changes from both (b) and (c) before creating AMDRs notification messages for (d). This ordering prevents (d) from creating more than one set of AMDRs per input change, and it can help ensure that all AMDRs are consistent with all data being processed for the clock cycle. If this ordering were not in place, it may be possible to get multiple ticks per cycle and some of the data can be inconsistent. Also, the ordering can help ensure that joins produce consistent results.
In some examples, a single data source is used more than once (i.e., has two or more child nodes in the DAG).
It will be appreciated that the implementations discussed above can use any update message format and are not limited to AMDR messages.
In some implementations, refresh processing of a DAG such as those shown in
As discussed above, DAG 602 can be generated from the first four lines of code 600. When the fifth line of code 600 is processed, DAG 602 is modified to include a preemptive table (X_export) that includes only the columns from table X that the fifth line of code specifies to be used by the plot( ) command (columns “Col1” and “Col2”), as shown by DAG 604 in
In some embodiments, export table handles such as X_export support the full suite of table operations, but execute everything except subscription requests via operating on the table being exported (e.g., table X) to create a new result table Z (not shown), and then on table Z to create a new subscription table Z_export (not shown). X_export additionally maintains state to keep track of pending index changes and snapshot delivery for all subscribed/subscribing clients (query processors and/or end user clients), batched up where subscription overlap permits, as shown by X_export in
For example, after RQP 680 receives code 600 from client 682, exported table handles (with listeners) are added to the DAG as dependents of tables X and Y (shown as “X_export” and “Y_export” in
In some embodiments, a replica table such as table X′ is strictly in-memory table—it keeps a full copy of the remote table X_export's index, and all snapshot data that it's currently subscribed to in sparse array-backed column sources, with redirection indexes to allow compaction and efficient changes.
In some embodiments, X′ and X′_2 of
Although not shown, additional plotting attributes can also be set such as, for example: type of chart (e.g., bar charts, line charts, scatter plots, etc.), data point appearance (e.g., point shape, line color, line thickness, point size, etc), various text (e.g., axis labels, chart titles, tool tip displayed, axis ticks, etc.), chart appearance (e.g., whether grid lines are displayed, what colors are used, etc.). The plotting attributes can be set individually based on data in an object (e.g., table columns as shown in
As shown in
At 904, the client transmits initial value(s) to query processor. Processing continues to 906.
At 906, the query processor receives the initial value(s), creates a preemptive table based on the initial value(s), and transmits to the client an export table handle to the preemptive table. Processing continues to 908.
At 908, the client receives the export table handle, creates a local copy of the preemptive table, and subscribes to the query processor to receive consistent updates to the preemptive table. Processing continues to 910.
At 910, the client sets the local copy of the preemptive table to be the active table of the switchable table object. Processing continues to 912.
At 912, the client determines a value of the initial value(s) has changed (e.g., a GUI input value has changed). Processing continues to 914.
At 914, the client transmits updated value(s) to query processor. Processing continues to 916.
At 916, the query processor creates a new preemptive table based on the updated value(s), and transmits to the client an export table handle to the new preemptive table. Processing continues to 918.
It will be appreciated that 902-908 may be repeated in whole or in part, examples of which are shown as lines 920 and 922. For example, 908-918 may be repeated to switch the active table of the switchable table object based on changes to the initial value(s) (e.g., switching out the active table when a user modifies GUI input fields such as a one-click GUI input).
In code 1000, four individual plot methods are required to generate the plot. Code 1002 uses the “plotBy( )” method to create the same chart created in code 1000, but with greater efficiency. In code 1002, only one table (“t6”) is generated by filtering the source table to contain information about all four USyms. Then, the “plotBy( )” method uses “USym” (the last argument) as the grouping column, which enables the plot to show data for the four USyms in the table, as shown as 1004, 1006, 1008, and 1010 of chart 1012 in
The “plotBy” group of methods can include “plotBy( )”, “catPlotBy( )”, and “ohlcPlotBy( )” and these methods can follow the same general syntax as their respective plotting methods with an additional argument to specify the grouping column to be used to plot multiple series. This greatly simplifies and shortens the query structure, improves efficiency, and enables plots that can adapt to the addition or removal of new groups. For example, if the second line of code 1002 were omitted, the “ployBySample” plot can adapt to the addition or removal of new groups.
An XY Series Chart can be used to show values over a continuum, such as time. XY Series can be represented as a line, a bar, an area or as a collection of points. The X axis can be used to show the domain, while the Y axis can show the related values at specific points in the range. The syntax for this method can be: plot(“SeriesName”, source, “xCol”, “yCol”), where “SeriesName” is the name (as a string) you want to use to identify the series on the chart itself, source is the table that holds the data you want to plot, “xCol” is the name of the column of data to be used for the X value, “yCol” is the name of the column of data to be used for the Y value. The “plotBy” version of this method can have the following syntax: plot(“SeriesName”, source, “xCol”, “yCol”, “groupByCol”), where “groupByCol” enables users to specify the grouping column(s) to be used to plot multiple series (there can be more than one grouping column in which case an additional argument is added for each additional grouping column (e.g., “‘State’, ‘City’”).
Category charts display the values of data from different discrete categories. By default, values can be presented as vertical bars. However, the chart can be presented as a bar, a stacked bar, a line, an area or a stacked area. The syntax for this method can be: catPlot(“SeriesName”, source, “CategoryCol”, “ValueCol”), where “SeriesName” is the name (string) you want to use to identify the series on the chart itself, source is the table that holds the data you want to plot, “CategoryCol” is the name of the column (as a string) to be used for the categories, and “ValueCol” is the name of the column (as a string) to be used for the values. The “plotBy” version of this method can have the following syntax: catPlotBy(“SeriesName”, source, “CategoryCol”, “ValueCol”, “groupByCol”), where “groupByCol” enables users to specify the grouping column(s) to be used to plot multiple series (there can be more than one grouping column in which case an additional argument is added for each additional grouping column (e.g., “‘State’, ‘City’”).
The Open, High, Low and Close (OHLC) chart typically shows four prices of a security or commodity per time slice: the open and close of the time slice, and the highest and lowest values reached during the time slice. This charting method can use a dataset that includes one column containing the values for the X axis (time), and one column for each of the corresponding four values (open, high, low, close) and has the following syntax: ohlcPlot(“SeriesName”, source, “Time”, “Open”, “High”, “Low”, “Close”), where “SeriesName” is the name (as a string) you want to use to identify the series on the chart itself, source is the table that holds the data you want to plot, “Time” is the name (as a string) of the column to be used for the X axis, “Open” is the name of the column (as a string) holding the opening price, “High” is the name of the column (as a string) holding the highest price, and “Low” is the name of the column (as a string) holding the lowest price, “Close” is the name of the column (as a string) holding the closing price. The “plotBy” version of this method can have the following syntax: ohlcPlotBy(“SeriesName”, source, “Time”, “Open”, “High”, “Low”, “Close”, “groupByCol”), where “groupByCol” enables users to specify the grouping column(s) to be used to plot multiple series (there can be more than one grouping column in which case an additional argument is added for each additional grouping column (e.g., “‘State’, ‘City’”).
Although references have been made herein to tables and table data, it will be appreciated that the disclosed systems and methods can be applied with various computer data objects to, for example, provide flexible data routing and caching for such objects in accordance with the disclosed subject matter. For example, references herein to tables can include a collection of objects generally, and tables can include column types that are not limited to scalar values and can include complex types (e.g., objects).
It will be appreciated that the modules, processes, systems, and sections described above can be implemented in hardware, hardware programmed by software, software instructions stored on a nontransitory computer readable medium or a combination of the above. A system as described above, for example, can include a processor configured to execute a sequence of programmed instructions stored on a nontransitory computer readable medium. For example, the processor can include, but not be limited to, a personal computer or workstation or other such computing system that includes a processor, microprocessor, microcontroller device, or is comprised of control logic including integrated circuits such as, for example, an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), a field programmable gate array (FPGA), a graphics processing unit (e.g., GPGPU or GPU) or the like. The instructions can be compiled from source code instructions provided in accordance with a programming language such as Java, C, C++, C # .net, assembly or the like. The instructions can also comprise code and data objects provided in accordance with, for example, the Visual Basic™ language, a specialized database query language, or another structured or object-oriented programming language. The sequence of programmed instructions, or programmable logic device configuration software, and data associated therewith can be stored in a nontransitory computer-readable medium such as a computer memory or storage device which may be any suitable memory apparatus, such as, but not limited to ROM, PROM, EEPROM, RAM, flash memory, disk drive and the like.
Furthermore, the modules, processes systems, and sections can be implemented as a single processor or as a distributed processor. Further, it should be appreciated that the steps mentioned above may be performed on a single or distributed processor (single and/or multi-core, or cloud computing system). Also, the processes, system components, modules, and sub-modules described in the various figures of and for embodiments above may be distributed across multiple computers or systems or may be co-located in a single processor or system. Example structural embodiment alternatives suitable for implementing the modules, sections, systems, means, or processes described herein are provided below.
The modules, processors or systems described above can be implemented as a programmed general purpose computer, an electronic device programmed with microcode, a hard-wired analog logic circuit, software stored on a computer-readable medium or signal, an optical computing device, a networked system of electronic and/or optical devices, a special purpose computing device, an integrated circuit device, a semiconductor chip, and/or a software module or object stored on a computer-readable medium or signal, for example.
Embodiments of the method and system (or their sub-components or modules), may be implemented on a general-purpose computer, a special-purpose computer, a programmed microprocessor or microcontroller and peripheral integrated circuit element, an ASIC or other integrated circuit, a digital signal processor, a hardwired electronic or logic circuit such as a discrete element circuit, a programmed logic circuit such as a PLD, PLA, FPGA, PAL, GP, GPU, or the like. In general, any processor capable of implementing the functions or steps described herein can be used to implement embodiments of the method, system, or a computer program product (software program stored on a nontransitory computer readable medium).
Furthermore, embodiments of the disclosed method, system, and computer program product (or software instructions stored on a nontransitory computer readable medium) may be readily implemented, fully or partially, in software using, for example, object or object-oriented software development environments that provide portable source code that can be used on a variety of computer platforms. Alternatively, embodiments of the disclosed method, system, and computer program product can be implemented partially or fully in hardware using, for example, standard logic circuits or a VLSI design. Other hardware or software can be used to implement embodiments depending on the speed and/or efficiency requirements of the systems, the particular function, and/or particular software or hardware system, microprocessor, or microcomputer being utilized. Embodiments of the method, system, and computer program product can be implemented in hardware and/or software using any known or later developed systems or structures, devices and/or software by those of ordinary skill in the applicable art from the function description provided herein and with a general basic knowledge of the software engineering and computer networking arts.
Moreover, embodiments of the disclosed method, system, and computer readable media (or computer program product) can be implemented in software executed on a programmed general purpose computer, a special purpose computer, a microprocessor, or the like.
It is, therefore, apparent that there is provided, in accordance with the various embodiments disclosed herein, methods, systems and computer readable media for computer data distribution architecture connecting an update propagation graph through multiple remote query processors.
Application Ser. No. 15/813,127, entitled “COMPUTER DATA DISTRIBUTION ARCHITECTURE CONNECTING AN UPDATE PROPAGATION GRAPH THROUGH MULTIPLE REMOTE QUERY PROCESSORS” and filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Nov. 14, 2017, is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety as if fully set forth herein.
Application Ser. No. 15/813,112, entitled “COMPUTER DATA SYSTEM DATA SOURCE REFRESHING USING AN UPDATE PROPAGATION GRAPH HAVING A MERGED JOIN LISTENER” and filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Nov. 14, 2017, is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety as if fully set forth herein.
Application Ser. No. 15/813,142, entitled “COMPUTER DATA SYSTEM DATA SOURCE HAVING AN UPDATE PROPAGATION GRAPH WITH FEEDBACK CYCLICALITY” and filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Nov. 14, 2017, is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety as if fully set forth herein.
Application Ser. No. 15/813,119, entitled “KEYED ROW SELECTION” and filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Nov. 14, 2017, is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety as if fully set forth herein.
While the disclosed subject matter has been described in conjunction with a number of embodiments, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications and variations would be, or are, apparent to those of ordinary skill in the applicable arts. Accordingly, Applicants intend to embrace all such alternatives, modifications, equivalents and variations that are within the spirit and scope of the disclosed subject matter.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/549,908, entitled “COMPUTER DATA SYSTEM” and filed on Aug. 24, 2017, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5335202 | Manning et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5452434 | Macdonald | Sep 1995 | A |
5469567 | Okada | Nov 1995 | A |
5504885 | Alashqur | Apr 1996 | A |
5530939 | Mansfield et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5568632 | Nelson | Oct 1996 | A |
5673369 | Kim | Sep 1997 | A |
5701461 | Dalal et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5701467 | Freeston | Dec 1997 | A |
5764953 | Collins et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5787428 | Hart | Jul 1998 | A |
5806059 | Tsuchida et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5859972 | Subramaniam et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5875334 | Chow et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5878415 | Olds | Mar 1999 | A |
5890167 | Bridge et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5899990 | Maritzen et al. | May 1999 | A |
5920860 | Maheshwari et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5943672 | Yoshida | Aug 1999 | A |
5960087 | Tribble et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5991810 | Shapiro et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999918 | Williams et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006220 | Haderle et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6032144 | Srivastava et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032148 | Wilkes | Feb 2000 | A |
6038563 | Bapat et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6058394 | Bakow et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061684 | Glasser et al. | May 2000 | A |
6138112 | Slutz | Oct 2000 | A |
6160548 | Lea et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6266669 | Brodersen et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6289357 | Parker | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292803 | Richardson et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6304876 | Isip | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317728 | Kane | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327702 | Sauntry et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6336114 | Garrison | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6353819 | Edwards et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6367068 | Vaidyanathan et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389414 | Delo et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6389462 | Cohen et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6438537 | Netz et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446069 | Yaung et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6460037 | Weiss et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473750 | Petculescu et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6487552 | Lei et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6496833 | Goldberg et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505189 | Au et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6505241 | Pitts | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6510551 | Miller | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6530075 | Beadle et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538651 | Hayman et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6546402 | Beyer et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553375 | Huang et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6584474 | Pereira | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6604104 | Smith | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6618720 | Au et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631374 | Klein et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6640234 | Coffen et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6697880 | Dougherty | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6701415 | Hendren | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6714962 | Helland et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6725243 | Snapp | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6732100 | Brodersen et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6745332 | Wong et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6748374 | Madan et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6748455 | Hinson et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6760719 | Hanson et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6775660 | Lin et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785668 | Polo et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6795851 | Noy | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6816855 | Hartel et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6820082 | Cook et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6829620 | Michael et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6832229 | Reed | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6851088 | Conner et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6882994 | Yoshimura et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6925472 | Kong | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6934717 | James | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6947928 | Dettinger et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6983291 | Cochrane et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6985895 | Witkowski et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6985899 | Chan et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6985904 | Kaluskar et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7020649 | Cochrane et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7024414 | Sah et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031962 | Moses | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7058657 | Berno | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7089228 | Arnold et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7089245 | George et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7096216 | Anonsen | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7099927 | Cudd et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103608 | Ozbutun et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7110997 | Turkel et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7127462 | Hiraga et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7146357 | Suzuki et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7149742 | Eastham et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7167870 | Avvari et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171469 | Ackaouy et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7174341 | Ghukasyan et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7181686 | Bahrs | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7188105 | Dettinger et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7200620 | Gupta | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7216115 | Walters et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7216116 | Nilsson et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7219302 | O'Shaughnessy et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7225189 | McCormack et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7254808 | Trappen et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7257689 | Baird | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7272605 | Hinshaw et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7308580 | Nelson et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7316003 | Dulepet et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7330969 | Harrison et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7333941 | Choi | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7343585 | Lau et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7350237 | Vogel et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7380242 | Alaluf | May 2008 | B2 |
7401088 | Chintakayala et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7426521 | Harter | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7430549 | Zane et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7433863 | Zane et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7447865 | Uppala et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7478094 | Ho et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7484096 | Garg et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7493311 | Cutsinger et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7506055 | McClain et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7523462 | Nesamoney | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7529734 | Dirisala | May 2009 | B2 |
7529750 | Bair | May 2009 | B2 |
7542958 | Warren et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7552223 | Ackaouy et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7610351 | Gollapudi et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7620687 | Chen et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7624126 | Pizzo et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7627603 | Rosenblum et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7661141 | Dutta et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7664778 | Yagoub et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7672275 | Yajnik et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7680782 | Chen et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7711716 | Stonecipher | May 2010 | B2 |
7711740 | Minore et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7747640 | Dettinger et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7761444 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7797356 | Iyer et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7827204 | Heinzel et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7827403 | Wong et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7827523 | Ahmed et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7882121 | Bruno et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7882132 | Ghatare | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7904487 | Ghatare | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7908259 | Branscome et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7908266 | Zeringue et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7930412 | Yeap et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7966311 | Haase | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7966312 | Nolan et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7966343 | Yang et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7970777 | Saxena et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7979431 | Qazi et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7984043 | Waas | Jul 2011 | B1 |
8019795 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8027293 | Spaur et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8032525 | Bowers et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8037542 | Taylor et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8046394 | Shatdal | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8046749 | Owen et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8055672 | Djugash et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8060484 | Bandera et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8171018 | Zane et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8180789 | Wasserman et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8196121 | Peshansky et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8209356 | Roesler | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8286189 | Kukreja et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8321833 | Langworthy et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8332435 | Ballard et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8359305 | Burke et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8375127 | Lita | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8380757 | Bailey et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8418142 | Ao et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8433701 | Sargeant et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8458218 | Wildermuth | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8473897 | Box et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8478713 | Cotner et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8515942 | Marum et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8543620 | Ching | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8553028 | Urbach | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8555263 | Allen et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8560502 | Vora | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8595151 | Hao et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8601016 | Briggs et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8631034 | Peloski | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8650182 | Murthy | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8660869 | MacIntyre et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8676863 | Connell et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8683488 | Kukreja et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8713518 | Pointer et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8719252 | Miranker et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8725707 | Chen et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8726254 | Rohde et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8745014 | Travis | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8745510 | D'Alo′et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8751823 | Myles et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8768961 | Krishnamurthy | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8788254 | Peloski | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8793243 | Weyerhaeuser et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8805947 | Kuzkin et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8806133 | Hay et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8812625 | Chitilian et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8838656 | Cheriton | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8855999 | Elliot | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8863156 | Lepanto et al. | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8874512 | Jin et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8880569 | Draper et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8880787 | Kimmel et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8881121 | Ali | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8886631 | Abadi et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8903717 | Elliot | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8903842 | Bloesch et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8922579 | Mi et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8924384 | Driesen et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8930892 | Pointer et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8954418 | Faerber et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8959495 | Chafi et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8996864 | Maigne et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9031930 | Valentin | May 2015 | B2 |
9077611 | Cordray et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9122765 | Chen | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9195712 | Freedman et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9298768 | Varakin et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9311357 | Ramesh et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9372671 | Balan et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9384184 | Acuña et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9612959 | Caudy et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9613018 | Zeldis et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9613109 | Wright et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9619210 | Kent I et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9633060 | Caudy et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9639570 | Wright et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9672238 | Wright et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9679006 | Wright | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9690821 | Wright et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9710511 | Wright et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9760591 | Caudy et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9805084 | Wright | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9832068 | McSherry et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9836494 | Caudy et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9836495 | Wright | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9886469 | Kent I et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9898496 | Caudy et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9934266 | Wright et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10002153 | Teodorescu et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10002154 | Kent I et al. | Jun 2018 | B1 |
10002155 | Caudy et al. | Jun 2018 | B1 |
10003673 | Caudy et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10019138 | Zeldis et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10069943 | Teodorescu et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
20020002576 | Wollrath et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020007331 | Lo et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020054587 | Baker et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065981 | Jenne et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020129168 | Kanai et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020156722 | Greenwood | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030004952 | Nixon et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030061216 | Moses | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030074400 | Brooks et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030110416 | Morrison et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030167261 | Grust et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182261 | Patterson | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030208484 | Chang et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030208505 | Mullins et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030233632 | Aigen et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040002961 | Dettinger et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040076155 | Yajnik et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040111492 | Nakahara et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040148630 | Choi | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040186813 | Tedesco et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040216150 | Scheifler et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220923 | Nica | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040254876 | Coval et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050015490 | Saare et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050060693 | Robison et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050097447 | Serra et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050102284 | Srinivasan et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050102636 | McKeon et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050131893 | Glan | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132384 | Morrison et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138624 | Morrison et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050165866 | Bohannon et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050198001 | Cunningham et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060059253 | Goodman et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074901 | Pirahesh et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085490 | Baron et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060100989 | Chinchwadkar et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060101019 | Nelson et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060116983 | Dettinger et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060116999 | Dettinger et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136361 | Peri et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060173693 | Arazi et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195460 | Nori et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060212847 | Tarditi et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218123 | Chowdhuri et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218200 | Factor et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060230016 | Cunningham et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060253311 | Yin et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271510 | Harward et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060277162 | Smith | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070011211 | Reeves et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027884 | Heger et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070033518 | Kenna et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070073765 | Chen | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070101252 | Chamberlain et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116287 | Rasizade et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070169003 | Branda et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070256060 | Ryu et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070258508 | Werb et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271280 | Chandasekaran | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070299822 | Jopp et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080022136 | Mattsson et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033907 | Woehler et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080034084 | Pandya | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046804 | Rui et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080072150 | Chan et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080120283 | Liu et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080155565 | Poduri | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080168135 | Redlich et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080235238 | Jalobeanu et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080263179 | Buttner et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080276241 | Bajpai et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080319951 | Ueno et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090019029 | Tommaney et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090022095 | Spaur et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024615 | Pedro et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090037391 | Agrawal et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090055370 | Dagum et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090083215 | Burger | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090089312 | Chi et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090157723 | De Peuter | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090248902 | Blue | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090254516 | Meiyyappan et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090271472 | Scheifler et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090300770 | Rowney et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319058 | Rovaglio et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319484 | Golbandi et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327242 | Brown et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100036801 | Pirvali et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042587 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100047760 | Best et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100049715 | Jacobsen et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100161555 | Nica et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100186082 | Ladki et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100199161 | Aureglia et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100205017 | Sichelman et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100205351 | Wiener et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100281005 | Carlin et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100281071 | Ben-Zvi et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110126110 | Vilke et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110126154 | Boehler et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110153603 | Adiba et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110161378 | Williamson | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110167020 | Yang et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110178984 | Talius et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110194563 | Shen et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110219020 | Oks et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110314019 | Peris | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120110030 | Pomponio | May 2012 | A1 |
20120144234 | Clark et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159303 | Friedrich et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120191446 | Binsztok et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120192096 | Bowman et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120197868 | Fauser et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209886 | Henderson | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120215741 | Poole et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120221528 | Renkes | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120246052 | Taylor et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120254143 | Varma et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120259759 | Crist et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120296846 | Teeter | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130041946 | Joel et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130080514 | Gupta et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130086107 | Genochio et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130166556 | Baeumges et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130173667 | Soderberg et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130179460 | Cervantes et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130185619 | Ludwig | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130191370 | Chen et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130198232 | Shamgunov et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130226959 | Dittrich et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130246560 | Feng et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130263123 | Zhou et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130290243 | Hazel et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130304725 | Nee et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130304744 | McSherry et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130311352 | Kayanuma et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130311488 | Erdogan et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130318129 | Vingralek et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130346365 | Kan et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140019494 | Tang | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140040203 | Lu et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140059646 | Hannel et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140082724 | Pearson et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140136521 | Pappas | May 2014 | A1 |
20140143123 | Banke et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140149997 | Kukreja et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140156618 | Castellano | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140173023 | Varney et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140181036 | Dhamankar et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140181081 | Veldhuizen | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140188924 | Ma et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140195558 | Murthy et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140201194 | Reddy et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140215446 | Araya et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140222768 | Rambo et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140229506 | Lee | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140229874 | Strauss | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140244687 | Shmueli et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140279810 | Mann et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140280522 | Watte | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140282227 | Nixon et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140282444 | Araya et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140282540 | Bonnet et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140292765 | Maruyama et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140297611 | Abbour et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140317084 | Chaudhry et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140324821 | Meiyyappan et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140330700 | Studnitzer et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140330807 | Weyerhaeuser et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140344186 | Nadler | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140344391 | Varney et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140359574 | Beckwith et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140372482 | Martin et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140380051 | Edward et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150019516 | Wein et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150026155 | Martin | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150067640 | Booker et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150074066 | Li et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150082218 | Affoneh et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150088894 | Czarlinska et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150095381 | Chen et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150120261 | Giannacopoulos et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150127599 | Schiebeler | May 2015 | A1 |
20150154262 | Yang et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150172117 | Dolinsky et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150188778 | Asayag et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150205588 | Bates et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150205589 | Daily | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150254298 | Bourbonnais et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150304182 | Brodsky et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150317359 | Tran et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150356157 | Anderson et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160026442 | Chhaparia | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160065670 | Kimmel et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160092599 | Barsness et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160125018 | Tomoda et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160171070 | Hrle et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160179754 | Borza et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160253294 | Allen et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160316038 | Jolfaei | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160335281 | Teodorescu et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160335304 | Teodorescu et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160335317 | Teodorescu et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160335323 | Teodorescu et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160335330 | Teodoresou et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160335361 | Teodoresou et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170161514 | Dettinger et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170177677 | Wright et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170185385 | Kent I et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170192910 | Wright et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170206229 | Caudy et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170206256 | Tsirogiannis et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170235794 | Wright et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170235798 | Wright et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170249350 | Wright et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170270150 | Wright et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170316046 | Caudy et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170359415 | Venkatraman et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180004796 | Kent I et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180011891 | Wright et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180052879 | Wright | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180137175 | Teodorescu et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2309462 | Dec 2000 | CA |
1406463 | Apr 2004 | EP |
1198769 | Jun 2008 | EP |
2199961 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2423816 | Feb 2012 | EP |
2743839 | Jun 2014 | EP |
2421798 | Jun 2011 | RU |
2000000879 | Jan 2000 | WO |
2001079964 | Oct 2001 | WO |
2011120161 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2012136627 | Oct 2012 | WO |
2014026220 | Feb 2014 | WO |
2014143208 | Sep 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Final Office Action dated May 4, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,009. |
Gal, Lei et al. “An Efficient Summary Graph Driven Method for RDF Query Processing”, dated Oct. 27, 2015. Retreived from http://arxiv.org/pdf/1510.07749.pdf. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 18, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032582 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 18, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032584 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 18, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032588 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 18, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032593 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 18, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032597 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 18, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032599 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 18, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032605 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 25, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032590 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 25, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032592 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 4, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032581 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 28, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032586 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 28, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032587 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 28, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032589 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 1, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032596 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 1, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032598 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 1, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032601 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 1, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032602 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 1, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032607 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 15, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032591 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 15, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032594 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 15, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032600 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 29, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032595 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 29, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032606 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 8, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032603 filed May 14, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 8, 2016, in International Appln. No. PCT/US2016/032604 filed May 14, 2016. |
Jellema, Lucas. “Implementing Cell Highlighting in JSF-based Rich Enterprise Apps (Part 1)”, dated Nov. 2008. Retrieved from http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/articles/adf/jellema-adfcellhighlighting-087850.html (last accessed Jun. 16, 2016). |
Kramer, The Combining DAG: A Technique for Parallel Data Flow Analysis, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 5, No. 8, Aug. 1994, pp. 805-813. |
Lou, Yuan. “A Multi-Agent Decision Support System for Stock Trading”, IEEE Network, Jan./Feb. 2002. Retreived from http://www.reading.ac.uk/AcaDepts/si/sisweb13/ais/papers/journal12-A%20multi-agent%20Framework.pdf. |
Mallet, “Relational Database Support for Spatio-Temporal Data”, Technical Report TR 04-21, Sep. 2004, University of Alberta, Department of Computing Science. |
Mariyappan, Balakrishnan. “10 Useful Linux Bash_Completion Complete Command Examples (Bash Command Line Completion on Steroids)”, dated Dec. 2, 2013. Retrieved from http://www.thegeekstuff.com/2013/12/bash-completion-complete/ (last accessed Jun. 16, 2016). |
Murray, Derek G. et al. “Naiad: a timely dataflow system.” SOSP '13 Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles. pp. 439-455. Nov. 2013. |
Non-final Office Action dated Apr. 12, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,997. |
Non-final Office Action dated Apr. 19, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,974. |
Non-final Office Action dated Apr. 23, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/813,127. |
Non-final Office Action dated Apr. 5, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,984. |
Non-final Office Action dated Aug. 10, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 16/004,578. |
Non-final Office Action dated Aug. 12, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,001. |
Non-final Office Action dated Aug. 16, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,993. |
Non-final Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,991. |
Non-final Office Action dated Aug. 25, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,980. |
Non-final Office Action dated Aug. 26, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,995. |
Non-final Office Action dated Aug. 8, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,983. |
Non-final Office Action dated Dec. 13, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/608,963. |
Non-final Office Action dated Dec. 28, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,996. |
Non-final Office Action dated Dec. 28, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/796,230. |
Non-final Office Action dated Feb. 12, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/466,836. |
Non-final Office Action dated Feb. 15, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/813,112. |
Non-final Office Action dated Feb. 28, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/813,119. |
Non-final Office Action dated Feb. 8, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,997. |
Non-final Office Action dated Jan. 4, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/583,777. |
Non-final Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,995. |
Non-final Office Action dated Jun. 29, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,974. |
Non-final Office Action dated Jun. 8, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/452,574. |
Non-final Office Action dated Mar. 2, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,984. |
Non-final Office Action dated Mar. 20, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,006. |
Non-final Office Action dated Nov. 15, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/654,461. |
Non-final Office Action dated Nov. 17, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,999. |
Non-final Office Action dated Nov. 21, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,005. |
Non-final Office Action dated Nov. 30, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,012. |
Non-final Office Action dated Oct. 13, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,009. |
Non-final Office Action dated Oct. 27, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,006. |
Non-final Office Action dated Oct. 5, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/428,145. |
Non-final Office Action dated Oct. 7, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,998. |
Non-final Office Action dated Sep. 1, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,979. |
Non-final Office Action dated Sep. 1, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,011. |
Non-final Office Action dated Sep. 1, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,012. |
Non-final Office Action dated Sep. 14, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,984. |
Non-final Office Action dated Sep. 16, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,988. |
Non-final Office Action dated Sep. 22, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,987. |
Non-final Office Action dated Sep. 26, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,005. |
Non-final Office Action dated Sep. 29, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,990. |
Non-final Office Action dated Sep. 8, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,975. |
Non-final Office Action dated Sep. 9, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,996. |
Non-final Office Action dated Sep. 9, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,010. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 30, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,012. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 19, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,001. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 22, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,011. |
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 7, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,985. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 1, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,988. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 12, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/813,142. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 14, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,979. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 26, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/428,145. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 28, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,990. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 30, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,987. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 11, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,995. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 28, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,009. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 19, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,980. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 20, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,975. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 1, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/464,314. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 2, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,998. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 31, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,998. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 10, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,988. |
Notice of Allowance dated May 4, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/897,547. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 17, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,991. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 17, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,993. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 21, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,983. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 8, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,007. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 11, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,007. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 21, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,999. |
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 6, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/610,162. |
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 11, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/608,963. |
Palpanas, Themistoklis et al. “Incremental Maintenance for Non-Distributive Aggregate Functions”, Proceedings of the 28th VLDB Conference, 2002. Retreived from http://www.vldb.org/conf/2002/S22P04.pdf. |
PowerShell Team, Intellisense in Windows PowerShell ISE 3.0, dated Jun. 12, 2012, Windows PowerShell Blog, pp. 1-6 Retrieved: https://biogs.msdn.microsoft.com/powershell/2012/06/12/intellisense-in-windows-powershell-ise-3-0/. |
Smith, Ian. “Guide to Using SQL: Computed and Automatic Columns.” Rdb Jornal, dated Sep. 2008, retrieved Aug. 15, 2016, retrieved from the Internet <URL: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/products/rdb/automatic-columns-132042.pdf>. |
Wes McKinney & PyData Development Team. “pandas: powerful Python data analysis toolkit, Release 0.16.1” Dated May 11, 2015. Retrieved from: http://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/version/0.16.1/index.html. |
Wes McKinney & PyData Development Team. “pandas: powerful Python data analysis toolkit, Release 0.18.1” Dated May 3, 2016. Retrieved from: http://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/version/0.18.1/index.html. |
Wu, Buwen et al. “Scalable SPARQL Querying using Path Partitioning”, 31st IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE 2015), Seoul, Korea, Apr. 13-17, 2015. Retreived from http://imada.sdu.dk˜zhou/papers/icde2015.pdf. |
“About Entering Commands in the Command Window”, dated Dec. 16, 2015. Retrieved from https://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/autocad/learn-explore/caas/CloudHelp/cloudhelp/2016/ENU/AutoCAD-Core/files/GUID-BB0C3E79-66AF-4557-9140-D31B4CF3C9CF-htm.html (last accessed Jun. 16, 2016). |
“Change Data Capture”, Oracle Database Online Documentation 11g Release 1 (11.1), dated Apr. 5, 2016. Retreived from https://web.archive.org/web/20160405032625/http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28313/cdc.htm. |
“Chapter 24. Query access plans”, Tuning Database Performance, DB2 Version 9.5 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows, pp. 301-462, dated Dec. 2010. Retreived from http://public.dhe.ibm.com/ps/products/db2/info/vr95/pdf/en_US/DB2PerfTuneTroubleshoot-db2d3e953.pdf. |
“GNU Emacs Manual”, dated Apr. 15, 2016, pp. 43-47. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20160415175915/http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_mono/emacs.html. |
“Google Protocol RPC Library Overview”, dated Apr. 27, 2016. Retrieved from https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/python/tools/protorpc/ (last accessed Jun. 16, 2016). |
“IBM—What is HBase?”, dated Sep. 6, 2015. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20150906022050/ http://www-01.ibm.com/software/data/infosphere/hadoop/hbase/. |
“IBM Informix TimeSeries data management”, dated Jan. 18, 2016. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20160118072141/http://www-01.ibm.com/software/data/informix/timeseries/. |
“IBM InfoSphere BigInsights 3.0.0—Importing data from and exporting data to DB2 by using Sqoop”, dated Jan. 15, 2015. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20150115034058/http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSPT3X_3.0.0/com.ibm.swg.im.infosphere.biginsights.import.doc/doc/data_warehouse_sqoop.html. |
“Maximize Data Value with Very Large Database Management by SAP Sybase IQ”, dated 2013. Retrieved from http://www.sap.com/bin/sapcom/en_us/downloadasset.2013-06-jun-11-11.maximize-data-value-with-very-large-database-management-by-sap-sybase-iq-pdf.html. |
“Microsoft Azure—Managing Access Control Lists (ACLs) for Endpoints by using PowerShell”, dated Nov. 12, 2014. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20150110170715/http://msdn. microsoft.com/en-us/library/azure/dn376543.aspx. |
“Oracle Big Data Appliance—Perfect Balance Java API”, dated Sep. 20, 2015. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20131220040005/http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E41604_01/doc.22/e41667/toc.htm. |
“Oracle Big Data Appliance—X5-2”, dated Sep. 6, 2015. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20150906185409/http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/database/bigdata-appliance/overview/bigdataappliance-datasheet-1883358.pdf. |
“Oracle Big Data Appliance Software User's Guide”, dated Feb. 2015. Retrieved from https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E55905_01/doc.40/e55814.pdf. |
“SAP HANA Administration Guide”, dated Mar. 29, 2016, pp. 290-294. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20160417053656/http://help.sap.com/hana/SAP_HANA_Administration_Guide_en.pdf. |
“Tracking Data Changes”, SQL Server 2008 R2, dated Sep. 22, 2015. Retreived from https://web.archive.org/web/20150922000614/https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb933994(v=sql. 105).aspx. |
“Use Formula AutoComplete”, dated 2010. Retrieved from https://support.office.com/en-us/article/Use-Formula-AutoComplete-c7c46fa6-3a94-4150-a2f7-34140c1ee4d9 (last accessed Jun. 16, 2016). |
Adelfio et al. “Schema Extraction for Tabular Data on the Web”, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, vol. 6, No. 6. Apr. 2013. Retrieved from http://www.cs.umd.edu/˜hjs/pubs/spreadsheets-vldb13.pdf. |
Advisory Action dated Apr. 20, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,980. |
Advisory Action dated Apr. 6, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,995. |
Advisory Action dated Dec. 21, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,984. |
Advisory Action dated Mar. 31, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,996. |
Borror, Jefferey A. “Q for Mortals 2.0”, dated Nov. 1, 2011. Retreived from http://code.kx.com/wiki/JB:QforMortals2/contents. |
Breitbart, Update Propagation Protocols for Replicated Databases, SIGMOD '99 Philadelphia PA, 1999, pp. 97-108. |
Cheusheva, Svetlana. “How to change the row color based on a cell's value in Excel”, dated Oct. 29, 2013. Retrieved from https://www.ablebits.com/office-addins-blog/2013/10/29/excel-change-row-background-color/ (last accessed Jun. 16, 2016). |
Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Aug. 9, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,980. |
Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Jul. 31, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,999. |
Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Mar. 10, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,979. |
Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Oct. 26, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/610,162. |
Decision on Pre-Appeal Conference Request mailed Nov. 20, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,997. |
Ex Parte Quayle Action mailed Aug. 8, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,999. |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 10, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,006. |
Final Office Action dated Aug. 10, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/796,230. |
Final Office Action dated Aug. 2, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,996. |
Final Office Action dated Aug. 28, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/813,119. |
Final Office Action dated Dec. 19, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,995. |
Final Office Action dated Dec. 29, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,974. |
Final Office Action dated Feb. 24, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,993. |
Final Office Action dated Jan. 27, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,980. |
Final Office Action dated Jan. 31, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,996. |
Final Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,993. |
Final Office Action dated Jun. 18, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,005. |
Final Office Action dated Jun. 23, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,997. |
Final Office Action dated Mar. 1, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/154,975. |
Final Office Action dated Mar. 13, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,012. |
Final Office Action dated Mar. 31, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,005. |
Final Office Action dated May 15, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/155,010. |
Final Office Action dated May 18, 2018, in U.S. Appl. No. 15/654,461. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62549908 | Aug 2017 | US |