This document relates generally to computer-implemented workflow systems and more particularly to computer-implemented analysis of workflow systems.
Many software tools exist to track document workflow in a company. However when a workflow problem arises, such tools provide little or no effective mechanisms for a user to visually analyze workflow data that had been previously collected over a period of time. To overcome these and/or other disadvantages, systems and methods are provided for visually replaying historical workflow information. Users can move forwards and backwards while replaying on their computer screens historical workflow information.
Within the system 30, a workflow replayer software module 38 receives input 40 from a user 36 that specifies what historical workflow data 32 the user 36 wishes to replay. For example, the user input 40 may specify such items as a workflow time period of interest, a particular business transaction, a workflow item, a particular document, or combinations thereof. The workflow replayer module 38 may provide a workflow search interface to facilitate such operations involving the user 36.
The workflow replayer module 38 retrieves historical workflow data 32 from a database 44 based upon the user provided data. The historical workflow data 32 can include any aspect related to the processing of work tasks, such as how the tasks are structured, who performs them, what their relative order is, how they are synchronized, how information flows to support the tasks, how tasks are being tracked, etc. The database 44 may store other types of information related to the workflow item, such as accounting information related to the task.
After retrieval of the historical workflow data 32, the workflow replayer module 38 allows the user 36 to step forwards and backwards through the historical workflow data 32. As the user 36 indicates whether the replaying is to proceed forwards or backwards, the workflow replayer module 38 generates the appropriate workflow replay data 42 for display to the user 36. The workflow replayer data 42 includes all or a portion of the retrieved historical workflow data 32 for display to the user 36. The workflow replay data 42 may also include additional data, such as data designating how the historical workflow data 32 is to be displayed on the user computer's interface 46.
The ability to manipulate workflow by winding it backwards in time, allows a user 36 to view it against a live database 44, without disturbing the actual location of any of those documents involved in the workflow replaying. For example, a manager may wish to just roll a task back to three hours ago to see what actually happened, or roll workflow back to yesterday without affecting the processing of the workstations or tasks and with everybody else in the organization still working in real-time going forward.
In stepping forward, the data associated with the task at time point 3 (102) is used to generate the workflow replay data that is then displayed to the user. If the user continues to step forward, then workflow replay data is generated related to the task at time point 4 (104) and so on.
The user can also elect to step back in time. If the user were at time point 3 (102) and elects to step backwards, then workflow replay data is generated for the task at time point 2 (106). The user can step further back in time until no more historical data is available for the selected task.
As the user proceeds forwards or backwards in time, the workflow replay data may be displayed on the user's computer in many different formats, such as graphically, textually, or a combination of both. For example as shown at 150 in
A replaying system may be used with many different types of documents and tasks. For example, the document to be processed by the workstations may be one of the hundreds or thousands of insurance claims that an insurance company receives on a daily basis. The document is processed through the insurance company's workstations. One workstation receives a loss notice from the insurance broker; another workstation reviews the notice to ensure that it is complete before forwarding it to a supervisor; the supervisor reviews the file for compliance before approving it. The claim is further processed in an ordered fashion by other workstations until processing of the claim is complete. At each stage of the processing, workflow data is captured and stored in the database.
If a workflow problem had occurred during processing of a claim and is only discovered later (e.g., later that day or a month later), a user can access a workflow replayer module to recreate the actual workflow environment as it existed at that point in time. For example, a significant amount of overtime may have been required to process a certain number of claims that normally would not have required overtime. A workflow replayer module visually presents to the user the historical workfiow data, such as what documents were at what workstations and at what time on that day. The user can click off the hours off one at a time, and watch what happened to the workflow. The user may see that something of interest occurred between 2:00 PM and 3:00 PM. The user can then select a finer level of detail to see how the workflow proceeded between 2:00 PM and 3:00 PM, such as seeing the workflow at five minute increments or on a per minute basis. The user can use the greater level of granularity to identify the problem, such as identifying a delay at a workstation that caused a cascading series of events. By allowing the user to step forwards and backwards through the day's workflow as it had actually occurred at that time in the past, the user can more easily identify the causes of problems.
As another example, a loan processing manager may wish to replay the workflow associated with a loan production/approval process. The manager may view the graphical user interface 200 shown in
The manager can check through the graphical user interface 200 such historical workflow information associated with the loan file as comments the underwriter entered as well as when the underwriter selected an action on that loan file (e.g., cancel, approve or deny). The manager may proceed forward in time to see if it was necessary for the loan file to be routed to multiple underwriters for approval before submission to an account manager. The manager can view other data, such as what approvals were obtained and what other documents were in a workstation's queue at a particular time. The manager can also see the loan document in the document display window 204 as well as information and task rules 206 established for handling a loan application.
To assist the user in manipulating the workflow replay data 42, replayer controls 250 may be provided as shown in
As shown in
With reference to
Department level viewing includes viewing historical workflow data for groups of workstations. Abstracting to a department level 354 allows a user to see how workflow is being handled within the company at a higher level.
As shown in
With reference to
At step 606, replaying operations may wait until the user specifies the time point at which replaying shall begin, or the historical workflow data may automatically begin playing at the earliest time point provided in the retrieved historical workflow data. One or more of the workflow item's historical information is displayed to the user at step 608.
The user may replay the entire historical workflow data, or may elect to run another historical workflow data search, or may do some other workflow-related analyses as shown at 610. This operational scenario terminates at end block 612. It should be understood that similar to the other processing flows described herein, the steps and the order of the steps in the flowchart may be altered, modified and/or augmented and still achieve the desired outcome.
As an example of other workflow-related analyses, the user may choose to compare historical workflow data with actual real-time workflow data. As shown in
A manager may at the same time as other managers decide to access a workflow replayer module to review historical workflow data. The managers operating on different computers over a network (such as an intranet or Internet network) can concurrently and independently replay on their computer screens the same or different historical workflow data while allowing others to continue to operate. Such an operational scenario illustrates that business managers can analyze workflow without having to, for example, pour over printouts of static historical workflow data. Among other things, this frees business managers from having to manually interrelate tasks and workstations with time periods to assess how a workflow problem may have arisen.
While examples have been used to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable a person skilled in the art to make and use the invention, the patentable scope of the invention is defined by claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art.
As an example of the wide range and scope of the systems and methods disclosed herein, a workflow replayer module may be implemented in many different configurations. For example, a workflow replayer module may reside on a user's computer, or may reside on a server computer that generates the workflow replaying data for display on the user client computer's interface.
A workflow replayer module can also be used with a wide range of workflow software packages. For example, it may operate with a workflow software package that automates the workflow process by routing images and applications and forms and documents from desk to desk to ensure uniform rules (e.g., governmental regulatory requirements) as well as to improve efficiency of workers by obviating the need for them to have to look for all the documents and information they need to handle their respective portion of the overall task. An example of a commercially available workflow software package that performs routing of tasks and documents among workstations is the OnbaseĀ® Workflow software product from Hyland Software, Inc. (with offices in Westlake, Ohio).
As yet another example of the wide ranging uses and scope of the systems and methods disclosed herein, the systems and methods may be used in many different workflow environments, such as an insurance claim processing, medical records processing, loan application processing, accounts payable processing, etc.
Still further, the systems and methods disclosed herein may have their information (e.g., historical workflow data, workflow replay data, etc.) transmitted via data signals embodied on carrier signals (e.g., radio frequency carrier signals) or other communication pathways (e.g., fiber optics, infrared, etc.). The systems and methods may be provided on different types of computer readable media including instructions being executable by a computer to perform the operations described herein.
The computer components, software modules, functions and data structures described herein may be connected directly or indirectly to each other in order to allow the flow of data needed for their operations. It is also noted that a module includes but is not limited to a unit of code that performs a software operation, and can be implemented for example as a subroutine unit of code, or as a software function unit of code, or as an object (as in an object-oriented paradigm), or as an applet, or in a computer script language, or as another type of computer code. The computer components may be located on a single computer or distributed across multiple computers depending upon the situation at hand.
This application claims the benefit and priority of provisional application Ser. No. 60/507,239 filed Sep. 30, 2003 which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1865504 | Bird | Jul 1932 | A |
4923365 | Rollwage | May 1990 | A |
5038392 | Morris et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5161214 | Addink et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5168444 | Cukor et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5630069 | Flores et al. | May 1997 | A |
5706452 | Ivanov | Jan 1998 | A |
5734837 | Flores et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5762469 | Yu | Jun 1998 | A |
5860066 | Rouse | Jan 1999 | A |
5878398 | Tokuda et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5887154 | Iwasa et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5975843 | Ebihara | Nov 1999 | A |
5999724 | Iwasa et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6026365 | Hayashi | Feb 2000 | A |
6038541 | Tokuda et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6237006 | Weinberg et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6299406 | Yu et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314425 | Serbinis et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6370567 | Ouchi | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6401073 | Tokuda et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6438548 | Grim, III et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6511283 | Yoshioka | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6584466 | Serbinis et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6834371 | Jensen et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
7065493 | Homsi | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7131068 | O'Neal et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
20010027408 | Nakisa | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010027477 | Nakamura et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034738 | Cantwell et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020010705 | Park et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013786 | Machalek | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020026297 | Leymann et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020038357 | Haverstock et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020069101 | Vincent | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020073161 | Yamazaki et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020075293 | Charisius et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087385 | Vincent | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107931 | Singh et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116399 | Camps et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120581 | Schiavone et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020128890 | Dick et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020129081 | Rai et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133392 | Angel et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140730 | Linsey et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020140731 | Subramaniam et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020149618 | Estrada et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152234 | Estrada et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152254 | Teng | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020154172 | Linsey et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156808 | Duffy et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165882 | Zettel et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020196479 | Simske | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030014485 | Banatwala | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028562 | Shaughnessy et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030033167 | Arroyo et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030033192 | Zyman et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030055728 | Lin | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055811 | Stork et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030068828 | Dadala et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069780 | Hailwood et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074302 | Cope | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078801 | Cope | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078816 | Filep | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078820 | Ouchi | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078825 | Cope | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078874 | Cope | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030079180 | Cope | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030084053 | Govrin et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030088616 | Etessami et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093475 | Chang et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030110256 | Yoon et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115089 | Lurie | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115377 | Curtis et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030144867 | Campbell et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20050027845 | Secor et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050071187 A1 | Mar 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60507239 | Sep 2003 | US |