Computing floating-point polynomials in an integrated circuit device

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8949298
  • Patent Number
    8,949,298
  • Date Filed
    Friday, September 16, 2011
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 3, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
Polynomial circuitry for calculating a polynomial having terms including powers of an input variable, where the input variable has a mantissa and an exponent, and the circuitry has a number of bits of precision, includes multiplier circuitry that calculates a common power of the input variable factored out of terms of the polynomial having powers of the variable greater than 1. The polynomial circuitry further includes, for each respective remaining term of the polynomial that contributes to the number of bits of precision: (1) a coefficient memory loaded with a plurality of instances of a coefficient for the respective term, each instance being shifted by a different number of bits, (2) address circuitry for selecting one of the instances of the coefficient based on the exponent, and (3) circuitry for combining the selected instance of the coefficient with a corresponding power of the input variable to compute the respective term.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to computing floating-point polynomials in integrated circuit devices such as programmable logic devices (PLDs), and particularly to computing floating-point polynomials using fixed-point resources.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Horner's rule (also referred to as Horner's scheme or Horner's algorithm) is an efficient way of calculating polynomials, useful for both hardware and software.


A polynomial can be described as:










p


(
x
)


=





i
=
0

n








a
i



x
i



=


a
0

+


a
1


x

+


a
2



x
2


+


a
3



x
3


+

+


a
n



x
n








(
1
)








For an example where n=5, this can be reformatted using Horner's rule as:

p(x)=a0+x(a1+x(a2+x(a3+x(a4+a5X))))  (2)

This has the advantage of removing the calculations of powers of x. There are still as many addition operations as there are coefficients, and as many multiplication operations as there are terms of x. For this case of n=5, there are five addition operations, and five multiplication operations. For small inputs—i.e., inputs substantially less than 1—the number of terms that need to be calculated is low, because later terms become vanishingly small.


However, even for a small number of terms, substantial resources may be required. For example, applications in which these operations are used frequently call for double-precision arithmetic. In a PLD such as those sold by Altera Corporation under the trademark STRATIX®, this could translate to approximately 8,500 adaptive look-up tables (ALUTs) and 45 18×18 multipliers.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to method and circuitry for implementing floating-point polynomial series calculations using fixed-point resources. This reduces the amount of resources required, and also reduces datapath length and therefore latency. Embodiments of the invention are particularly well-suited to applications for which the input range can be kept small. One such class of operations are trigonometric functions, where range reduction can be used to keep the inputs small, as described in copending, commonly-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/717,212, filed Mar. 4, 2010, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. The circuitry can be provided in a fixed logic device, or can be configured into a programmable integrated circuit device such as a programmable logic device.


According to one aspect of the invention, denormalization operations are performed using the coefficients, instead of using arithmetic and logic resources to calculate and implement the denormalization, and the renormalization requires only a single-bit calculation. The remainder of the calculation can be carried out as a fixed-point calculation, consuming corresponding device area and with corresponding latency, while the results are equivalent to performing the same calculation using double-precision floating-point arithmetic.


In accordance with embodiments of the invention, there is provided polynomial circuitry for calculating a polynomial having terms including powers of an input variable, where the input variable is represented by a mantissa and an exponent, and the circuitry has a number of bits of precision. The polynomial circuitry includes (1) a respective coefficient memory loaded with a plurality of respective instances of a coefficient for each respective one of the terms, each respective instance being shifted by a different number of bits, and (2) address circuitry for selecting one of the respective instances of the coefficient based on the exponent.


A method of operating such circuitry, and a method of configuring a programmable device as such polynomial circuitry are also provided, and a non-transitory machine-readable data storage medium is provided that is encoded with software for performing the method of configuring such circuitry on a programmable device.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Further features of the invention, its nature and various advantages will be apparent upon consideration of the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference characters refer to like parts throughout, and in which:



FIG. 1 shows an example of circuitry according to an embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of a magnetic data storage medium encoded with a set of machine-executable instructions for performing a method according to the present invention;



FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of an optically readable data storage medium encoded with a set of machine executable instructions for performing a method according to the present invention; and



FIG. 4 is a simplified block diagram of an illustrative system employing a programmable logic device incorporating the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Circuitry according to the invention implements Horner's rule for floating-point polynomial calculations by using the coefficients to perform denormalization and performing the remainder of the calculation as a fixed-point calculation. For any particular implementation of a polynomial calculation, each coefficient may be stored in a table as multiple versions of itself, each shifted a different amount. The exponent of the coefficient term could function as the index to the table, selecting the correct shifted version.


An embodiment of the invention may be understood by reference to an example of the inverse tangent (tan−1, ATAN or arctan) function. The inverse tangent function can be computed using the following series:










arctan


(
x
)


=

x
-


x
3

3

+


x
5

5

-



x
7

7









(
3
)








Using Horner's rule, this can be expressed as:










arctan


(
x
)


=

x
+


x
3



(



-
1

3

+


x
2

5

-



x
7

7





)







(
4
)















arctan


(
x
)


=

x
+

x


(

0
+

x


(

0
+

x


(



-
1

3

+


x


(

0
+

x
5


)






)



)



)







(
5
)








This uses two adders and five multipliers, although if equation (4) is limited to two terms it can be implemented using two adders and only three multipliers.


For an inverse tangent calculation, an accurate estimate is required for only a small range. This is also true of most other trigonometric functions. For example, a good tradeoff for a double-precision inverse tangent implementation would require an input range of 0-2−10 radians. For 52-bit precision as used in double-precision arithmetic, with a 10-bit input range, the second term would be 20 bits (x3-x) to the right of the first term, and the third term would be 40 bits (x5-x) to the right. The next term would be 60 bits to the right, and therefore can be ignored for this example of 52-bit precision. However, the invention would apply no matter how many terms were used.


As the second term is 20 bits to the right, it will have a maximum contribution of 32 bits (52 bits-20 bits) to the final result, and can therefore be well-represented with 36-bit precision. Similarly, as the third term is 40 bits to the right, it will have a maximum contribution of only 12 bits, and can therefore be well-represented by 18 bits.


If the input is less than 2−10, then the following terms will have even smaller contributions based on their powers. For example, if the input is 2−12, the second term will be 24 bits to the right and the third term will be 48 bits to the right. For inputs of 2−14 or less, even the third term contribution will be more than 56 bits to the right and make a negligible contribution to the result.


A full floating-point adder is not required to add together the terms. As long as the input is less than 1, each term will be less than its preceding term, so that swapping of operands is not required, and denormalization can be applied to the smaller term immediately. In fact, the denormalization shift can be applied directly to all of the following terms immediately, as each can be calculated in relation to the first term simultaneously.


As noted above, according to embodiments of the invention, the denormalization shifts are not applied as separate operations, but are applied to the coefficients. Therefore, they may be implemented as multiplications by constants. For example, in current PLD (e.g., FPGA) architectures, it is usually more efficient to implement such multiplications in specialized processing blocks (e.g., DSP blocks) that include fixed arithmetic structures with configurable interconnect, rather than in general-purpose programmable logic.


Regardless of how the multiplication operations are implemented, in accordance with embodiments of the invention, each coefficient may be represented by a table of shifted coefficients. The exponent of the term to which the coefficient is applied determines the required degree of shifting, and therefore functions as an index into the coefficient table.


Examples of the coefficient tables for the inverse tangent example are shown in Tables 1 and 2 (below) for the second and third terms, respectively, of the “inner series” of Equation (4). The value in the first column of each table is the address/index corresponding to the exponent of the value of the input x, expressed in binary form. The value in the second column of each table is the coefficient itself. From each entry to the next, the coefficient, if expressed in binary form, would be shifted by the product of the index and the power of the corresponding term of the series. However, to save space, the shifted coefficient values, which are signed binary numbers, are represented by the equivalent hexadecimal values. Thus, in Table 1, the coefficient values are eight-character hexadecimal values representing 32-bit signed binary values, while in Table 2, the coefficient values are five-character hexadecimal values representing 20-bit signed binary values:










TABLE 1





Index
Coefficient







00000
AAAAAAAA


00001
EAAAAAAA


00010
FAAAAAAA


00011
FEAAAAAA


00100
FFAAAAAA


00101
FFEAAAAA


00110
FFFAAAAA


00111
FFFEAAAA


01000
FFFFAAAA


01001
FFFFEAAA


01010
FFFFFAAA


01011
FFFFFEAA


01100
FFFFFFAA


01101
FFFFFFEA


01110
FFFFFFFA


01111
FFFFFFFE


10000
FFFFFFFF


>10000 
00000000

















TABLE 2





Index
Coefficient







00000
1999A


00001
0199A


00010
0019A


00011
0001A


00100
00002


>00100 
00000









In the examples shown, the second term will have 17 possible exponent values including the original unshifted value (32 bits of input range, with each successive shifted value decreasing by 2 bits per bit of reduction of the input power) as shown in Table 1, and the third term will have five possible exponent values including the original unshifted value (18 bits of input range, with each successive shifted value decreasing by 4 bits per bit of reduction of the input power) as shown in Table 2. In other embodiments, these tables may be somewhat larger, to allow at least some small contribution into the least significant bit position of the result.



FIG. 1 shows an embodiment of circuitry 100 for implementing Equation (4) according to an embodiment of the invention.


The input 111 is in double-precision format, including a 52-bit mantissa 121 (not including an implied leading ‘1’) and an 11-bit exponent 131. As part of the conversion to fixed-point processing, the mantissa is expanded to 53 bits by converting the implied leading ‘1’ to an actual leading ‘1’. The x3 term is calculated to 36-bit precision, by multiplying x by itself using a 36×36 bit fixed-point multiplier 101, and multiplying that result by x using another 36×36 bit fixed-point multiplier 102. The upper 36 bits of x are used in each multiplication operation. x is inherently aligned with itself for the first fixed-point operation, while x2 is aligned with x for the second fixed-point operation.


To calculate the “inner series” of Equation (4), the upper 18 bits of the x2 term are multiplied, using fixed point multiplier 103, with the output of the third term coefficient table 107. Third term coefficient table 107 is addressed by the input exponent through address circuitry 117, to select the properly-shifted version of the coefficient, which is provided in an unnormalized fixed-point format. The result of that multiplication, right-shifted by 20 bits, is added to the 36-bit output of the second term coefficient table 108, which also is provided in an unnormalized fixed-point format, using a 36-bit fixed-point adder 104. Like third term coefficient table 107, second term coefficient table 108 is indexed by the input exponent through address circuitry 118 to select the properly-shifted version of the coefficient.


That completes the first two terms of the “inner series.” As noted above, in this example, the third and subsequent terms are beyond the 52-bit precision of the system and therefore need not be computed. For systems of different precision, or where different numbers of bits are provided in the inputs or coefficients, it is possible that a different number of terms of the “inner series” may be calculated.


The 36-bit inner series result is then multiplied by the x3 term using a 36×36-bit fixed-point multiplier 105. The upper 36 bits of that product, right-shifted by 20 bits, is added to the prefixed input mantissa 111 by 53-bit fixed point adder 106.


The mantissa is then normalized. Because the sum of all of the following terms would always be very small—i.e., less than 0.510—only a 1-bit normalization is needed (i.e., a 1-bit shift will be applied where needed). The 1-bit normalization can be carried out using a 52-bit 2:1 multiplexer 109.


As can be seen, this example uses two 36×36 fixed-point multipliers (101 and 105) and two 18×18 fixed-point multipliers (102 and 103), as well as one 36-bit fixed-point adder 104, one 53-bit fixed-point adder 106, and one 52-bit 2:1 multiplexer, as well as memories for the coefficient tables 107, 108. In all, if this example is implemented in a STRATIX® PLD of the type described above, 188 adaptive look-up tables and 14 18×18 fixed-point multipliers are used. This is much smaller than previously-known hardware implementations of Horner's method.


Specifically, a brute-force double-precision floating-point implantation of Equation (4) would use about 4000 adaptive look-up tables and 27 18×18 fixed-point multipliers. By finding an optimal translation to fixed-point arithmetic, the required resources are greatly reduced when implementing the present invention. The latency also is much smaller, at about 10 clocks, which is less than the latency of a single double-precision floating-point multiplier or adder by itself.


Although the example described above in connection with FIG. 1 involved a polynomial including only odd powers of x (x3, x5, . . . ), the invention can be used with a polynomial including only even powers of x (x2, x4, . . . ) or including all powers of x (x2, x3, x4, x5, . . . ). More generally, the higher powers would be multiplied out first, and the lower powers would be computed by shifting relative to the higher powers, with that shifting coded into the coefficient tables. Looked at another way, a power of x, up to the largest common power of x greater than 1 (x3 in the example, but possibly as low as) x2) would be factored out and multiplied first. Only terms in the remaining factored polynomial whose powers of x did not exceed the precision of the system would be retained. Each term would be shifted according to its power of x, with that shifting being coded into the coefficient tables, to provide an intermediate result. That intermediate result would be multiplied by the factored-out common power of x to provide the final result.


Thus it is seen that circuitry and methods for performing polynomial calculations have been provided. This invention may have use in hard-wired implementations of polynomial calculations, as well as in software implementations.


Another potential use for the present invention may be in programmable devices such as PLDs, as discussed above, where programming software can be provided to allow users to configure a programmable device to perform polynomial calculations, either as an end result or as part of a larger operation. The result would be that fewer logic resources of the programmable device would be consumed. And where the programmable device is provided with a certain number of dedicated blocks for arithmetic functions (to spare the user from having to configure arithmetic functions from general-purpose logic), the number of dedicated blocks needed to be provided (which may be provided at the expense of additional general-purpose logic) can be reduced (or sufficient dedicated blocks for more operations, without further reducing the amount of general-purpose logic, can be provided).


Instructions for carrying out a method according to this invention for programming a programmable device to perform polynomial calculations, may be encoded on a machine-readable medium, to be executed by a suitable computer or similar device to implement the method of the invention for programming or configuring PLDs or other programmable devices to perform operations as described above. For example, a personal computer may be equipped with an interface to which a PLD can be connected, and the personal computer can be used by a user to program the PLD using a suitable software tool, such as the QUARTUS® II software available from Altera Corporation, of San Jose, Calif.



FIG. 2 presents a cross section of a magnetic data storage medium 800 which can be encoded with a machine executable program that can be carried out by systems such as the aforementioned personal computer, or other computer or similar device. Medium 800 can be a floppy diskette or hard disk, or magnetic tape, having a suitable substrate 801, which may be conventional, and a suitable coating 802, which may be conventional, on one or both sides, containing magnetic domains (not visible) whose polarity or orientation can be altered magnetically. Except in the case where it is magnetic tape, medium 800 may also have an opening (not shown) for receiving the spindle of a disk drive or other data storage device.


The magnetic domains of coating 802 of medium 800 are polarized or oriented so as to encode, in manner which may be conventional, a machine-executable program, for execution by a programming system such as a personal computer or other computer or similar system, having a socket or peripheral attachment into which the PLD to be programmed may be inserted, to configure appropriate portions of the PLD, including its specialized processing blocks, if any, in accordance with the invention.



FIG. 3 shows a cross section of an optically-readable data storage medium 810 which also can be encoded with such a machine-executable program, which can be carried out by systems such as the aforementioned personal computer, or other computer or similar device. Medium 810 can be a conventional compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM) or digital video disk read-only memory (DVD-ROM) or a rewriteable medium such as a CD-R, CD-RW, DVD-R, DVD-RW, DVD+R, DVD+RW, or DVD-RAM or a magneto-optical disk which is optically readable and magneto-optically rewriteable. Medium 810 preferably has a suitable substrate 811, which may be conventional, and a suitable coating 812, which may be conventional, usually on one or both sides of substrate 811.


In the case of a CD-based or DVD-based medium, as is well known, coating 812 is reflective and is impressed with a plurality of pits 813, arranged on one or more layers, to encode the machine-executable program. The arrangement of pits is read by reflecting laser light off the surface of coating 812. A protective coating 814, which preferably is substantially transparent, is provided on top of coating 812.


In the case of magneto-optical disk, as is well known, coating 812 has no pits 813, but has a plurality of magnetic domains whose polarity or orientation can be changed magnetically when heated above a certain temperature, as by a laser (not shown). The orientation of the domains can be read by measuring the polarization of laser light reflected from coating 812. The arrangement of the domains encodes the program as described above.


A PLD 90 programmed according to the present invention may be used in many kinds of electronic devices. One possible use is in a data processing system 900 shown in FIG. 5. Data processing system 900 may include one or more of the following components: a processor 901; memory 902; I/O circuitry 903; and peripheral devices 904. These components are coupled together by a system bus 905 and are populated on a circuit board 906 which is contained in an end-user system 907.


System 900 can be used in a wide variety of applications, such as computer networking, data networking, instrumentation, video processing, digital signal processing, or any other application where the advantage of using programmable or reprogrammable logic is desirable. PLD 90 can be used to perform a variety of different logic functions. For example, PLD 90 can be configured as a processor or controller that works in cooperation with processor 901. PLD 90 may also be used as an arbiter for arbitrating access to a shared resources in system 900. In yet another example, PLD 90 can be configured as an interface between processor 901 and one of the other components in system 900. It should be noted that system 900 is only exemplary, and that the true scope and spirit of the invention should be indicated by the following claims.


Various technologies can be used to implement PLDs 90 as described above and incorporating this invention.


It will be understood that the foregoing is only illustrative of the principles of the invention, and that various modifications can be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. For example, the various elements of this invention can be provided on a PLD in any desired number and/or arrangement. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention can be practiced by other than the described embodiments, which are presented for purposes of illustration and not of limitation, and the present invention is limited only by the claims that follow.

Claims
  • 1. Polynomial circuitry for calculating a polynomial having terms including powers of an input variable, said input variable represented by a mantissa and an exponent, said circuitry having a number of bits of precision and comprising: a plurality of coefficient memories, each respective one of said coefficient memories corresponding to a respective one of said terms of said polynomial, wherein:for each respective one of said terms of said polynomial, said respective one of said coefficient memories that corresponds to said respective one of said terms of said polynomial is loaded with a plurality of instances of a respective coefficient for said respective one of said terms of said polynomial, andsaid instances of said respective coefficient for said respective one of said terms of said polynomial are multiple versions of said respective coefficient for said respective one of said terms of said polynomial, each version being shifted by a different number of bits; andrespective address circuitry associated with each respective one of said coefficient memories, said respective address circuitry selecting one of said instances of said respective coefficient for said respective one of said terms of said polynomial based on said exponent.
  • 2. The polynomial circuitry of claim 1 further comprising: multiplier circuitry that calculates a common power of said input variable factored out of terms of said polynomial having powers of said variable greater than 1; andfor each remaining respective one of said terms of said polynomial, from which said common power has been factored out, that contributes to said number of bits of precision, circuitry for combining said selected one of said instances of said respective coefficient for said respective one of said terms of said polynomial with a corresponding power of said input variable to compute said respective term of said polynomial.
  • 3. The polynomial circuitry of claim 2 further comprising circuitry for combining said respective ones of said terms of said polynomial.
  • 4. The polynomial circuitry of claim 3 wherein said multiplier circuitry comprises at least one fixed-point multiplier.
  • 5. The polynomial circuitry of claim 3 wherein said circuitry for combining said selected one of said instances of said respective coefficient with a corresponding power of said input variable to compute said respective term of said polynomial comprises, for at least each of said respective terms for which said corresponding power is greater than 1, a multiplier circuit.
  • 6. The polynomial circuitry of claim 5 wherein said multiplier circuit comprises a fixed-point multiplier.
  • 7. The circuitry of claim 3 wherein said circuitry for combining said respective ones of said terms of said polynomial comprises adder circuitry.
  • 8. The circuitry of claim 7 wherein said adder circuitry comprises fixed-point adder circuitry.
  • 9. A method of configuring a programmable device as circuitry for calculating a polynomial having terms including powers of an input variable, said input variable represented by a mantissa and an exponent, said circuitry having a number of bits of precision, said method comprising: configuring, on said programmable device:a plurality of coefficient memories, each respective one of said coefficient memories corresponding to a respective one of said terms of said polynomial, wherein:for each respective one of said terms of said polynomial, said respective one of said coefficient memories that corresponds to said respective one of said terms of said polynomial is loaded with a plurality of instances of a respective coefficient for said respective one of said terms of said polynomial, andsaid instances of said respective coefficient corresponding to said respective one of said terms of said polynomial are multiple versions of said respective coefficient for said respective one of said terms of said polynomial, each version being shifted by a different number of bits; andrespective address circuitry associated with each respective one of said coefficient memories, said respective address circuitry selecting one of said instances of said respective coefficient corresponding to said respective one of said terms of said polynomial based on said exponent.
  • 10. The method of claim 9 further comprising: configuring circuitry on said programmable device as multiplier circuitry that calculates a common power of said input variable factored out of terms of said polynomial having powers of said variable greater than 1; andfor each remaining respective one of said terms of said polynomial, from which said common power has been factored out, that contributes to said number of bits of precision, configuring circuitry for combining said selected one of said instances of said respective coefficient for said respective one of said terms of said polynomial with a corresponding power of said input variable to compute said respective term of said polynomial.
  • 11. The method of claim 10 further comprising configuring circuitry on said programmable device as circuitry for combining said respective ones of said terms of said polynomial.
  • 12. The method of claim 11 wherein said configuring circuitry of said programmable device as multiplier circuitry comprises configuring at least one fixed-point multiplier.
  • 13. The method of claim 11 wherein said configuring circuitry for combining said selected one of said instances of said respective coefficient with a corresponding power of said input variable to compute said respective term of said polynomial comprises configuring a multiplier circuit for at least each of said respective terms for which said corresponding power is greater than 1.
  • 14. The method of claim 13 wherein said configuring a multiplier circuit comprises configuring a fixed-point multiplier.
  • 15. The method of claim 11 wherein said configuring circuitry for combining said respective ones of said terms of said polynomial comprises configuring adder circuitry.
  • 16. The method of claim 15 wherein said configuring adder circuitry comprises configuring fixed-point adder circuitry.
  • 17. A non-transitory machine-readable data storage medium encoded with non-transitory machine-executable instructions for configuring a programmable device as circuitry for calculating a polynomial having terms including powers of an input variable, said input variable represented by a mantissa and an exponent, said circuitry having a number of bits of precision, said instructions comprising: instructions to configure circuitry of said programmable device as:a plurality of coefficient memories, each respective one of said coefficient memories corresponding to a respective one of said terms of said polynomial, and being wherein:for each respective one of said terms of said polynomial, said respective one of said coefficient memories that corresponds to said respective one of said terms of said polynomial is loaded with a plurality of respective instances of a respective coefficient for said respective one of said terms of said polynomial, andsaid instances of said respective coefficient corresponding to said respective one of said terms of said polynomial are multiple versions of said coefficient for said respective one of said terms of said polynomial, each version being shifted by a different number of bits; andaddress circuitry for selecting one of said instances of said respective coefficient based on said exponent.
  • 18. The non-transitory machine-readable data storage medium of claim 17 wherein said instructions further comprise: instructions to configure circuitry on said programmable device as multiplier circuitry that calculates a common power of said input variable factored out of terms of said polynomial having powers of said variable greater than 1; andinstructions to configure, for each remaining respective one of said terms of said polynomial, from which said common power has been factored out, that contributes to said number of bits of precision, circuitry on said programmable device as circuitry for combining said selected one of said instances of said respective coefficient for said respective one of said terms of said polynomial with a corresponding power of said input variable to compute said respective term of said polynomial.
  • 19. The non-transitory machine-readable data storage medium of claim 18 wherein said instructions further comprise instructions to configure circuitry on said programmable device as circuitry for combining said respective ones of said terms of said polynomial.
  • 20. The non-transitory machine-readable data storage medium of claim 19 wherein said instructions to configure circuitry of said programmable device as multiplier circuitry comprise instructions to configure at least one fixed-point multiplier.
  • 21. The non-transitory machine-readable data storage medium of claim 19 wherein said instructions to configure circuitry for combining said selected one of said instances of said respective coefficient with a corresponding power of said input variable to compute said respective term of said polynomial comprise instructions to configure a multiplier circuit for at least each of said respective terms for which said corresponding power is greater than 1.
  • 22. The non-transitory machine-readable data storage medium of claim 21 wherein said instructions to configure a multiplier circuit comprise instructions to configure a fixed-point multiplier.
  • 23. The non-transitory machine-readable data storage medium of claim 19 wherein said instructions to configure circuitry for combining said respective ones of said terms of said polynomial comprise instructions to configure adder circuitry.
  • 24. The non-transitory machine-readable data storage medium of claim 23 wherein said instructions to configure adder circuitry comprise instructions to configure fixed-point adder circuitry.
  • 25. A method of using circuitry to calculate a polynomial having terms including powers of an input variable, said input variable represented by a mantissa and an exponent, said circuitry having a number of bits of precision, said method comprising: for each respective one of said terms of said polynomial, shifting, by a different number of bits, a plurality of instances of a respective coefficient corresponding to said respective one of said terms of said polynomial,for each respective one of said terms of said polynomial, loading a respective one of a plurality of coefficient memories with said plurality of instances of said respective coefficient corresponding to said respective one of said terms of said polynomial, andfor each respective one of said terms of said polynomial, selecting one of said instances of said respective coefficient corresponding to said respective one of said terms of said polynomial by using said exponent as an address into said respective one of a plurality of coefficient memories.
  • 26. The method of claim 25 further comprising: calculating a common power of said input variable factored out of terms of said polynomial having powers of said variable greater than 1; andfor each remaining respective one of said terms of said polynomial, from which said common power has been factored out, that contributes to said number of bits of precision, combining said selected instance of said respective coefficient corresponding to said remaining respective one of said terms of said polynomial with a corresponding power of said input variable to compute said remaining respective one of said terms of said polynomial.
US Referenced Citations (395)
Number Name Date Kind
3473160 Wahlstrom Oct 1969 A
3800130 Martinson et al. Mar 1974 A
3814924 Tate Jun 1974 A
3896299 Rhodes Jul 1975 A
4156927 McElroy et al. May 1979 A
4179746 Tubbs Dec 1979 A
4212076 Conners Jul 1980 A
4215406 Gomola et al. Jul 1980 A
4215407 Gomola et al. Jul 1980 A
4422155 Amir et al. Dec 1983 A
4484259 Palmer et al. Nov 1984 A
4521907 Amir et al. Jun 1985 A
4575812 Kloker et al. Mar 1986 A
4597053 Chamberlin Jun 1986 A
4616330 Betz Oct 1986 A
4623961 Mackiewicz Nov 1986 A
4682302 Williams Jul 1987 A
4718057 Venkitakrishnan et al. Jan 1988 A
4727508 Williams Feb 1988 A
4736335 Barkan Apr 1988 A
4754421 Bosshart Jun 1988 A
4777614 Ward Oct 1988 A
4791590 Ku et al. Dec 1988 A
4799004 Mori Jan 1989 A
4811263 Hedley et al. Mar 1989 A
4823295 Mader Apr 1989 A
4839847 Laprade Jun 1989 A
4871930 Wong et al. Oct 1989 A
4908788 Fujiyama Mar 1990 A
4912345 Steele et al. Mar 1990 A
4918637 Morton Apr 1990 A
4967160 Quievy et al. Oct 1990 A
4982354 Takeuchi et al. Jan 1991 A
4991010 Hailey et al. Feb 1991 A
4994997 Martin et al. Feb 1991 A
4999803 Turrini et al. Mar 1991 A
5068813 Thoen Nov 1991 A
5073863 Zhang Dec 1991 A
5081604 Tanaka Jan 1992 A
5122685 Chan et al. Jun 1992 A
5128559 Steele Jul 1992 A
5175702 Beraud et al. Dec 1992 A
5208491 Ebeling et al. May 1993 A
RE34363 Freeman Aug 1993 E
5267187 Hsieh et al. Nov 1993 A
5296759 Sutherland et al. Mar 1994 A
5338983 Agarwala Aug 1994 A
5339263 White Aug 1994 A
5349250 New Sep 1994 A
5357152 Jennings, III et al. Oct 1994 A
5371422 Patel et al. Dec 1994 A
5373461 Bearden et al. Dec 1994 A
5375079 Uramoto et al. Dec 1994 A
5381357 Wedgwood et al. Jan 1995 A
5404324 Colon-Bonet Apr 1995 A
5424589 Dobbelaere et al. Jun 1995 A
5446651 Moyse et al. Aug 1995 A
5451948 Jekel Sep 1995 A
5452231 Butts et al. Sep 1995 A
5452375 Rousseau et al. Sep 1995 A
5457644 McCollum Oct 1995 A
5465226 Goto Nov 1995 A
5465375 Thepaut et al. Nov 1995 A
5483178 Costello et al. Jan 1996 A
5497498 Taylor Mar 1996 A
5500812 Saishi et al. Mar 1996 A
5500828 Doddington et al. Mar 1996 A
5523963 Hsieh et al. Jun 1996 A
5528550 Pawate et al. Jun 1996 A
5537601 Kimura et al. Jul 1996 A
5541864 Van Bavel et al. Jul 1996 A
5546018 New et al. Aug 1996 A
5550993 Ehlig et al. Aug 1996 A
5559450 Ngai et al. Sep 1996 A
5563526 Hastings et al. Oct 1996 A
5563819 Nelson Oct 1996 A
5570039 Oswald et al. Oct 1996 A
5570040 Lytle et al. Oct 1996 A
5572148 Lytle et al. Nov 1996 A
5581501 Sansbury et al. Dec 1996 A
5590350 Guttag et al. Dec 1996 A
5594366 Khong et al. Jan 1997 A
5594912 Brueckmann et al. Jan 1997 A
5596763 Guttag et al. Jan 1997 A
5606266 Pedersen Feb 1997 A
5617058 Adrian et al. Apr 1997 A
5623377 Behrens et al. Apr 1997 A
5631848 Laczko et al. May 1997 A
5633601 Nagaraj May 1997 A
5636150 Okamoto Jun 1997 A
5636368 Harrison et al. Jun 1997 A
5640578 Balmer et al. Jun 1997 A
5644519 Yatim et al. Jul 1997 A
5644522 Moyse et al. Jul 1997 A
5646545 Trimberger et al. Jul 1997 A
5646875 Taborn et al. Jul 1997 A
5648732 Duncan Jul 1997 A
5652903 Weng et al. Jul 1997 A
5655069 Ogawara et al. Aug 1997 A
5664192 Lloyd et al. Sep 1997 A
5689195 Cliff et al. Nov 1997 A
5696708 Leung Dec 1997 A
5729495 Madurawe Mar 1998 A
5740404 Baji Apr 1998 A
5744980 McGowan et al. Apr 1998 A
5744991 Jefferson et al. Apr 1998 A
5754459 Telikepalli May 1998 A
5761483 Trimberger Jun 1998 A
5764555 McPherson et al. Jun 1998 A
5768613 Asghar Jun 1998 A
5771186 Kodali et al. Jun 1998 A
5777912 Leung et al. Jul 1998 A
5784636 Rupp Jul 1998 A
5790446 Yu et al. Aug 1998 A
5794067 Kadowaki Aug 1998 A
5801546 Pierce et al. Sep 1998 A
5805477 Perner Sep 1998 A
5805913 Guttag et al. Sep 1998 A
5808926 Gorshtein et al. Sep 1998 A
5812479 Cliff et al. Sep 1998 A
5812562 Baeg Sep 1998 A
5815422 Dockser Sep 1998 A
5821776 McGowan Oct 1998 A
5825202 Tavana et al. Oct 1998 A
5838165 Chatter Nov 1998 A
5841684 Dockser Nov 1998 A
5847579 Trimberger Dec 1998 A
5847978 Ogura et al. Dec 1998 A
5847981 Kelley et al. Dec 1998 A
5859878 Phillips et al. Jan 1999 A
5869979 Bocchino Feb 1999 A
5872380 Rostoker et al. Feb 1999 A
5874834 New Feb 1999 A
5878250 LeBlanc Mar 1999 A
5880981 Kojima et al. Mar 1999 A
5892962 Cloutier Apr 1999 A
5894228 Reddy et al. Apr 1999 A
5898602 Rothman et al. Apr 1999 A
5931898 Khoury Aug 1999 A
5942914 Reddy et al. Aug 1999 A
5944774 Dent Aug 1999 A
5949710 Pass et al. Sep 1999 A
5951673 Miyata Sep 1999 A
5956265 Lewis Sep 1999 A
5959871 Pierzchala et al. Sep 1999 A
5960193 Guttag et al. Sep 1999 A
5961635 Guttag et al. Oct 1999 A
5963048 Harrison et al. Oct 1999 A
5963050 Young et al. Oct 1999 A
5968196 Ramamurthy et al. Oct 1999 A
5970254 Cooke et al. Oct 1999 A
5978260 Trimberger et al. Nov 1999 A
5982195 Cliff et al. Nov 1999 A
5986465 Mendel Nov 1999 A
5991788 Mintzer Nov 1999 A
5991898 Rajski et al. Nov 1999 A
5995748 Guttag et al. Nov 1999 A
5999015 Cliff et al. Dec 1999 A
5999990 Sharrit et al. Dec 1999 A
6005806 Madurawe et al. Dec 1999 A
6006321 Abbott Dec 1999 A
6009451 Burns Dec 1999 A
6018755 Gonikberg et al. Jan 2000 A
6020759 Heile Feb 2000 A
6021423 Nag et al. Feb 2000 A
6026420 DesJardins et al. Feb 2000 A
6029187 Verbauwhede Feb 2000 A
6031763 Sansbury Feb 2000 A
6041339 Yu et al. Mar 2000 A
6041340 Mintzer Mar 2000 A
6052327 Reddy et al. Apr 2000 A
6052755 Terrill et al. Apr 2000 A
6052773 DeHon et al. Apr 2000 A
6055555 Boswell et al. Apr 2000 A
6064614 Khoury May 2000 A
6065131 Andrews et al. May 2000 A
6066960 Pedersen May 2000 A
6069487 Lane et al. May 2000 A
6072994 Phillips et al. Jun 2000 A
6073154 Dick Jun 2000 A
6075381 LaBerge Jun 2000 A
6084429 Trimberger Jul 2000 A
6085317 Smith Jul 2000 A
6091261 DeLange Jul 2000 A
6091765 Pietzold, III et al. Jul 2000 A
6094726 Gonion et al. Jul 2000 A
6097988 Tobias Aug 2000 A
6098163 Guttag et al. Aug 2000 A
6107820 Jefferson et al. Aug 2000 A
6107821 Kelem et al. Aug 2000 A
6107824 Reddy et al. Aug 2000 A
6130554 Kolze et al. Oct 2000 A
6140839 Kaviani et al. Oct 2000 A
6144980 Oberman Nov 2000 A
6154049 New Nov 2000 A
6157210 Zaveri et al. Dec 2000 A
6163788 Chen et al. Dec 2000 A
6167415 Fischer et al. Dec 2000 A
6175849 Smith Jan 2001 B1
6215326 Jefferson et al. Apr 2001 B1
6226735 Mirsky May 2001 B1
6242947 Trimberger Jun 2001 B1
6243729 Staszewski Jun 2001 B1
6246258 Lesea Jun 2001 B1
6260053 Maulik et al. Jul 2001 B1
6279021 Takano et al. Aug 2001 B1
6286024 Yano et al. Sep 2001 B1
6314442 Suzuki Nov 2001 B1
6314551 Borland Nov 2001 B1
6321246 Page et al. Nov 2001 B1
6323680 Pedersen et al. Nov 2001 B1
6327605 Arakawa et al. Dec 2001 B2
6346824 New Feb 2002 B1
6351142 Abbott Feb 2002 B1
6353843 Chehrazi et al. Mar 2002 B1
6359468 Park et al. Mar 2002 B1
6360240 Takano et al. Mar 2002 B1
6362650 New et al. Mar 2002 B1
6366944 Hossain et al. Apr 2002 B1
6367003 Davis Apr 2002 B1
6369610 Cheung et al. Apr 2002 B1
6377970 Abdallah et al. Apr 2002 B1
6385632 Choe et al. May 2002 B1
6407576 Ngai et al. Jun 2002 B1
6407694 Cox et al. Jun 2002 B1
6427157 Webb Jul 2002 B1
6434587 Liao et al. Aug 2002 B1
6438569 Abbott Aug 2002 B1
6438570 Miller Aug 2002 B1
6446107 Knowles Sep 2002 B1
6453382 Heile Sep 2002 B1
6467017 Ngai et al. Oct 2002 B1
6480980 Koe Nov 2002 B2
6483343 Faith et al. Nov 2002 B1
6487575 Oberman Nov 2002 B1
6523055 Yu et al. Feb 2003 B1
6523057 Savo et al. Feb 2003 B1
6531888 Abbott Mar 2003 B2
6538470 Langhammer et al. Mar 2003 B1
6542000 Black et al. Apr 2003 B1
6556044 Langhammer et al. Apr 2003 B2
6557092 Callen Apr 2003 B1
6571268 Giacalone et al. May 2003 B1
6573749 New et al. Jun 2003 B2
6574762 Karimi et al. Jun 2003 B1
6578060 Chen et al. Jun 2003 B2
6591283 Conway et al. Jul 2003 B1
6591357 Mirsky Jul 2003 B2
6600495 Boland et al. Jul 2003 B1
6600788 Dick et al. Jul 2003 B1
6628140 Langhammer et al. Sep 2003 B2
6687722 Larsson et al. Feb 2004 B1
6692534 Wang et al. Feb 2004 B1
6700581 Baldwin et al. Mar 2004 B2
6725441 Keller et al. Apr 2004 B1
6728901 Rajski et al. Apr 2004 B1
6731133 Feng et al. May 2004 B1
6732134 Rosenberg May 2004 B1
6744278 Liu et al. Jun 2004 B1
6745254 Boggs et al. Jun 2004 B2
6763367 Kwon et al. Jul 2004 B2
6771094 Langhammer et al. Aug 2004 B1
6774669 Liu et al. Aug 2004 B1
6781408 Langhammer Aug 2004 B1
6781410 Pani et al. Aug 2004 B2
6788104 Singh et al. Sep 2004 B2
6801924 Green et al. Oct 2004 B1
6806733 Pan et al. Oct 2004 B1
6836839 Master et al. Dec 2004 B2
6874079 Hogenauer Mar 2005 B2
6889238 Johnson May 2005 B2
6904471 Boggs et al. Jun 2005 B2
6917955 Botchev Jul 2005 B1
6924663 Masui et al. Aug 2005 B2
6963890 Dutta et al. Nov 2005 B2
6971083 Farrugia et al. Nov 2005 B1
6978287 Langhammer Dec 2005 B1
6983300 Ferroussat Jan 2006 B2
7020673 Ozawa Mar 2006 B2
7024446 Langhammer et al. Apr 2006 B2
7047272 Giacalone et al. May 2006 B2
7062526 Hoyle Jun 2006 B1
7093204 Oktem et al. Aug 2006 B2
7107305 Deng et al. Sep 2006 B2
7113969 Green et al. Sep 2006 B1
7181484 Stribaek et al. Feb 2007 B2
7200631 Mailaender et al. Apr 2007 B2
7230451 Langhammer Jun 2007 B1
7313585 Winterrowd Dec 2007 B2
7343388 Burney et al. Mar 2008 B1
7395298 Debes et al. Jul 2008 B2
7401109 Koc et al. Jul 2008 B2
7409417 Lou Aug 2008 B2
7415542 Hennedy et al. Aug 2008 B2
7421465 Rarick et al. Sep 2008 B1
7428565 Fujimori Sep 2008 B2
7428566 Siu et al. Sep 2008 B2
7430578 Debes et al. Sep 2008 B2
7430656 Sperber et al. Sep 2008 B2
7447310 Koc et al. Nov 2008 B2
7472155 Simkins et al. Dec 2008 B2
7508936 Eberle et al. Mar 2009 B2
7536430 Guevokian et al. May 2009 B2
7567997 Simkins et al. Jul 2009 B2
7590676 Langhammer Sep 2009 B1
7646430 Brown Elliott et al. Jan 2010 B2
7668896 Lutz et al. Feb 2010 B2
7719446 Rosenthal et al. May 2010 B2
7720898 Driker et al. May 2010 B2
7769797 Cho et al. Aug 2010 B2
7814136 Verma et al. Oct 2010 B1
7814137 Mauer Oct 2010 B1
7822799 Langhammer et al. Oct 2010 B1
7836117 Langhammer et al. Nov 2010 B1
7865541 Langhammer Jan 2011 B1
7917567 Mason et al. Mar 2011 B1
7930335 Gura Apr 2011 B2
7930336 Langhammer Apr 2011 B2
7949699 Neoh et al. May 2011 B1
7974997 Arviv et al. Jul 2011 B2
8041759 Langhammer et al. Oct 2011 B1
8090758 Shimanek et al. Jan 2012 B1
8112466 Minz et al. Feb 2012 B2
8301681 Lee et al. Oct 2012 B1
8307023 Leung et al. Nov 2012 B1
8386550 Mauer et al. Feb 2013 B1
8386553 Langhammer et al. Feb 2013 B1
8396914 Langhammer Mar 2013 B1
20010023425 Oberman et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010029515 Mirsky Oct 2001 A1
20010037351 Hellberg Nov 2001 A1
20010037352 Hong Nov 2001 A1
20020002573 Landers et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020032713 Jou et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020038324 Page et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020049798 Wang et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020078114 Wang et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020089348 Langhammer Jul 2002 A1
20020116434 Nancekievill Aug 2002 A1
20020129073 Page et al. Sep 2002 A1
20030088757 Lindner et al. May 2003 A1
20040064770 Xin Apr 2004 A1
20040083412 Corbin et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040103133 Gurney May 2004 A1
20040122882 Zakharov et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040148321 Guevorkian et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040172439 Lin Sep 2004 A1
20040178818 Crotty et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193981 Clark et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040267857 Abel et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040267863 Bhushan et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050038842 Stoye Feb 2005 A1
20050120122 Farnham Jun 2005 A1
20050144212 Simkins et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050144215 Simkins et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050144216 Simkins et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050166038 Wang et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050187997 Zheng et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050187999 Zheng et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050262175 Iino et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060020655 Lin Jan 2006 A1
20060059215 Maharatna et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060112160 Ishii et al. May 2006 A1
20060200732 Dobbek et al. Sep 2006 A1
20070083585 St. Denis et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070124352 Wittig May 2007 A1
20070185951 Lee et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070185952 Langhammer et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070226287 Lin et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070241773 Hutchings et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080133627 Langhammer et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080159441 Liao et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080183783 Tubbs Jul 2008 A1
20090028455 Nakamura et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090083358 Allen Mar 2009 A1
20090113186 Kato et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090164544 Dobbek et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090172052 DeLaquil et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090187615 Abe et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090228689 Muff et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090300088 Michaels et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100098189 Oketani Apr 2010 A1
20100131577 Gangalakurti et al. May 2010 A1
20100146022 Swartzlander et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100191939 Muff et al. Jul 2010 A1
20110161389 Langhammer et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110219052 Langhammer Sep 2011 A1
20110238720 Langhammer Sep 2011 A1
20110320513 Langhammer Dec 2011 A1
20120054254 Langhammer Mar 2012 A1
20120054256 Langhammer Mar 2012 A1
20120113133 Shpigelblat May 2012 A1
20120166512 Wong et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120191967 Lin et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120290819 Langhammer Nov 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (49)
Number Date Country
0 158 430 Oct 1985 EP
0 326 415 Aug 1989 EP
0 380 456 Aug 1990 EP
0 411 491 Feb 1991 EP
0 419 105 Mar 1991 EP
0 461 798 Dec 1991 EP
0 498 066 Aug 1992 EP
0 555 092 Aug 1993 EP
0 606 653 Jul 1994 EP
0 657 803 Jun 1995 EP
0 660 227 Jun 1995 EP
0 668 659 Aug 1995 EP
0 721 159 Jul 1996 EP
0 905 906 Mar 1999 EP
0 909 028 Apr 1999 EP
0 927 393 Jul 1999 EP
0 992 885 Apr 2000 EP
1 031 934 Aug 2000 EP
1 049 025 Nov 2000 EP
1 058 185 Dec 2000 EP
1 220 108 Jul 2002 EP
2 283 602 May 1995 GB
2 286 737 Aug 1995 GB
2 318 198 Apr 1998 GB
61-237133 Oct 1986 JP
63-216131 Aug 1988 JP
4-332036 Nov 1992 JP
5-134851 Jun 1993 JP
06-187129 Jul 1994 JP
7-135447 May 1995 JP
11-296345 Oct 1999 JP
2000-259394 Sep 2000 JP
2002-108606 Apr 2002 JP
2002-251281 Sep 2002 JP
WO9527243 Oct 1995 WO
WO9628774 Sep 1996 WO
WO9708606 Mar 1997 WO
WO9812629 Mar 1998 WO
WO9832071 Jul 1998 WO
WO9838741 Sep 1998 WO
WO9922292 May 1999 WO
WO9931574 Jun 1999 WO
WO9956394 Nov 1999 WO
WO0051239 Aug 2000 WO
WO0052824 Sep 2000 WO
WO0113562 Feb 2001 WO
WO 2005066832 Jul 2005 WO
WO 2005101190 Oct 2005 WO
WO 2010102007 Sep 2010 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (89)
Entry
Altera, “DSP Blocks in Stratix III Devices”, Chapter 5, pp. 1-42, Mar. 2010.
Altera Corporation, “Statix II Device Handbook, Chapter 6—DSP Blocks in Stratix II Devices,” v1.1, Jul. 2004.
Altera Corporation, “Digital Signal Processing (DSP),” Stratix Device Handbook, vol. 2, Chapter 6 and Chapter 7, v1.1 (Sep. 2004).
Altera Corporation, “DSP Blocks in Stratix II and Stratix II GX Devices,” Stratix II Device Handbook, vol. 2, Chapter 6, v4.0 (Oct. 2005).
Altera Corporation, “FIR Compiler: MegaCore® Function User Guide,” version 3.3.0, rev. 1, pp. 3-11 through 3-15 (Oct. 2005).
Altera Corporation, “Advanced Synthesis Cookbook: A Design Guide for Stratix II, Stratix III and Stratix IV Devices,” Document Version 3.0, 112 pgs., May 2008.
Amos, D., “PLD architectures match DSP algorithms,” Electronic Product Design, vol. 17, No. 7, Jul. 1996, pp. 30, 32.
Analog Devices, Inc., The Applications Engineering Staff of Analog Devices, DSP Division, Digital Signal Processing Applications Using the ADSP-2100 Family (edited by Amy Mar), 1990, pp. 141-192).
Andrejas, J., et al., “Reusable DSP functions in FPGAs,” Field-Programmable Logic and Applications. Roadmap to Reconfiourable Computing. 10th International Conference, FPL 2000. Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 1896), Aug. 27-30, 2000, pp. 456-461.
Aoki, T., “Signed-weight arithmetic and its application to a field-programmable digital filter architecture,” IEICE Transactions on Electronics , 1999 , vol. E82C, No. 9, Sep. 1999, pp. 1687-1698.
Ashour, M.A., et al., “An FPGA implementation guide for some different types of serial-parallel multiplier-structures,” Microelectronics Journal , vol. 31, No. 3, 2000, pp. 161-168.
Berg, B.L., et al.“Designing Power and Area Efficient Multistage FIR Decimators with Economical Low Order Filters,” ChipCenter Technical Note, Dec. 2001.
Bursky, D., “Programmable Logic Challenges Traditional ASIC SoC Designs”, Electronic Design, Apr. 15, 2002.
Chhabra, A. et al., Texas Instruments Inc., “A Block Floating Point Implementation on the TMS320C54x DSP”, Application Report SPRA610, Dec. 1999, pp. 1-10.
Colet, P., “When DSPs and FPGAs meet: Optimizing image processing architectures,” Advanced Imaging, vol. 12, No. 9, Sep. 1997, pp. 14, 16, 18.
Crookes, D., et al., “Design and implementation of a high level programming environment for FPGA-based image processing,” IEE Proceedings-Vision, Image and Signal Processing, vol. 147, No. 4, Aug. 2000, pp. 377-384.
Debowski, L., et al., “A new flexible architecture of digital control systems based on DSP and complex CPLD technology for power conversion applications,” PCIM 2000: Europe Official Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh International Intelligent Motion Conference, Jun. 6-8, 2000, pp. 281-286.
deDinechin, F. et al., “Large multipliers with less DSP blocks,” retrieved from http://hal-ens-lyon.archives-ouvertes.fr/ens1-00356421/en/, 9 pgs., 2009.
Dick, C., et al., “Configurable logic for digital communications: some signal processing perspectives,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 37, No. 8, Aug. 1999, pp. 107-111.
Do, T.-T., et al., “A flexible implementation of high-performance FIR filters on Xilinx FPGAs,” Field-Programmable Logic and Applications: From FPGAs to Computing Paradigm. 8th International Workshop, FPL'98. Proceedings, Hartenstein, R.W., et al., eds., Aug. 31-Sep. 3, 1998, pp. 441-445.
Farooqui, A., et al., “General Data-Path Organization of a MAC unit for VLSI Implementation of DSP Processors,” ISCAS '98, Part 2, May 31, 1998-Jun. 3, 1998, pp. 260-263.
Fujioka, Y., et al., “240 MOPS Reconfigurable Parallel VLSI Processor for Robot Control”, Proceedings of the 1992 International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control, Instrumentation, and Automation, vol. 3, pp. 1385-1390, Nov. 9-13, 1992.
Gaffer, A.A., et al., “Floating-Point Bitwidth Analysis via Automatic Differentiation,” IEEE Conference on Field Programmable Technology, Hong Kong, Dec. 2002.
Govindu, G. et al., “A Library of Parameterizable Floating-Point Cores for FPGAs and Their Application to Scientific Computing,” Proc Int'l Conf. Eng. Reconfiqurable Systems and Algorithms (ERSA'05), Jun. 2005.
Govindu, G. et al., “Analysis of High-performance Floating-point Arithmetic on FPGAs,” Proceedings of the 18th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (PDPS'04), pp. 149-156, Apr. 2004.
Guccione, S.A.,“Run-time Reconfiguration at Xilinx,” Parallel and distributed processing: 15 IPDPS 2000 workshops, Rolim, J., ed., May 1-5, 2000, p. 873.
Hauck, S., “The Future of Reconfigurable Systems,” Keynote Address, 5th Canadian Conference on Field Programmable Devices, Jun. 1998, http:--www.ee.washington.edu-people-faculty-hauck-publications-ReconfigFuture.PDF.
Haynes, S.D., et al., “Configurable multiplier blocks for embedding in FPGAs,” Electronicas Letters, vol. 34, No. 7, pp. 638-639 (Apr. 2, 1998).
Heysters, P.M., et al., “Mapping of DSP algorithms on field programmable function arrays,” Field-Programmable Logic and Applications. Roadmap to Reconfigurable Computing. 10th International Conference, FPL 2000. Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 1896), Aug. 27-30, 2000, pp. 400-411.
Huang, J., et al., “Simulated Performance of 1000BASE-T Receiver with Different Analog Front End Designs,” Proceedings of the 35th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, Nov. 4-7, 2001.
“Implementing Multipliers in Flex 10K EABs”, Altera, Mar. 1996.
“Implementing Logic with the Embedded Array in Flex 10K Devices”, Altera, May 2001, ver. 2.1.
Jinghua Li, “Design a pocket multi-bit multiplier in FPGA,” 1996 2nd International Conference on ASIC Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No. 96TH8140), Oct. 21-24, 1996, pp. 275-279.
Jones, G., “Field-programmable digital signal conditioning,” Electronic Product Design, vol. 21, No. 6, Jun. 2000, pp. C36-C38.
Karlstrom, K., et al., “High Performance, Low Latency FPGA based Floating Point Adder and Multiplier Units in a Virtex 4,” Norchip Conf., pp. 31-34, 2006.
Kiefer, R., et al., “Performance comparison of software-FPGA hardware partitions for a DSP application,” 14th Australian Microelectronics Conference. Microelectronics: Technology Today for the Future. MICRO '97 Proceedings, Sep. 28-Oct. 1, 1997, pp. 88-93.
Kim, Y., et al., “Fast GPU Implementation for the Solution of Tridiagonal Matrix Systems,” Journal of Korean Institute of Information Scientists and Engineers, vol. 32, No. 12, pp. 692-704, Dec. 2005.
Kramberger, I., “DSP acceleration using a reconfigurable FPGA,” ISIE '99. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (Cat. No. 99TH8465), vol. 3 , Jul. 12-16, 1999, pp. 1522-1525.
Langhammer, M., “How to implement DSP in programmable logic,” Elettronica Oggi, No. 266 , Dec. 1998, pp. 113-115.
Langhammer, M., “Implementing a DSP in Programmable Logic,” Online EE Times, May 1998, http:--www.eetimes.com-editorial-1998-coverstory9805.html.
Lazaravich, B.V., “Function block oriented field programmable logic arrays,” Motorola, Inc. Technical Developments, vol. 18, Mar. 1993, pp. 10-11.
Lattice Semiconductor Corp, ORCA® FPGA Express™ Interface Manual: ispLEVER® Version 3.0, 2002.
Lucent Technologies, Microelectronics Group,“Implementing and Optimizing Multipliers in ORCA™ FPGAs,”, Application Note.AP97-008FGPA, Feb. 1997.
Lund, D., et al., “A new development system for reconfigurable digital signal processing,” First International Conference on 3G Mobile Communication Technologies (Conf. Publ. No. 471), Mar. 27-29, 2000, pp. 306-310.
Martinson, L. et al., “Digital matched Filtering with Pipelined Floating Point Fast Fourier Transforms (FFT's),” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-23, No. 2, pp. 222-234, Apr. 1975.
Miller, N.L., et al., “Reconfigurable integrated circuit for high performance computer arithmetic,” Proceedings of the 1998 IEE Colloquium on Evolvable Hardware Systems (Digest), No. 233, 1998, pp. 2-1-2-4.
Mintzer, L., “Xilinx FPGA as an FFT processor,” Electronic Engineering, vol. 69, No. 845, May 1997, pp. 81, 82, 84.
Faura et al., “A Novel Mixed Signal Programmable Device With On-Chip Microprocessor,” Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 1997. Proceedings of the IEEE 1997 Santa Clara, CA, USA, May 5, 1997, pp. 103-106.
Nakasato, N., et al., “Acceleration of Hydrosynamical Simulations using a FPGA board”, The Institute of Electronics Information and Communication Technical Report CPSY2005-47, vol. 105, No. 515, Jan. 17, 2006.
Nedjah, N., et al., “Fast Less Recursive Hardware for Large Number Multiplication Using Karatsuba-Ofman's Algorithm,” Computer and Information Sciences—ISCIS, pp. 43-50, 2003.
Nozal, L., et al., “A new vision system: programmable logic devices and digital signal processor architecture (PLD+DSP),” Proceedings IECON '91. 1991 International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control and Instrumentation (Cat. No. 91CH2976-9), vol. 3, Oct. 28-Nov. 1, 1991, pp. 2014-2018.
Osana, Y., et al., “Hardware-resource Utilization Analysis on an FPGA-Based Biochemical Simulator ReCSiP”, The Institute of Electronics Information and Communication Technical Report CPSY2005-63, vol. 105, No. 516, Jan. 18, 2006.
Papenfuss, J.R, et al., “Implementation of a real-time, frequency selective, RF channel simulator using a hybrid DSP-FPGA architecture,” RAWCON 2000: 2000 IEEE Radio and Wireless Conference (Cat. No. 00EX404), Sep. 10-13, 2000, pp. 135-138.
Parhami, B., “Configurable arithmetic arrays with data-driven control,” 34th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, vol. 1, 2000, pp. 89-93.
“The QuickDSP Design Guide”, Quicklogic, Aug. 2001, revision B.
“QuickDSP™ Family Data Sheet”, Quicklogic, Aug. 7, 2001, revision B.
Rangasayee, K., “Complex PLDs let you produce efficient arithmetic designs,” EDN (European Edition) vol. 41, No. 13, Jun. 20, 1996, pp. 109, 110, 112, 114, 116.
Rosado, A., et al., “A high-speed multiplier coprocessor unit based on FPGA,” Journal of Electrical Engineering, vol. 48, No. 11-12, 1997, pp. 298-302.
Santillan-Q., G.F., et al., “Real-time integer convolution implemented using systolic arrays and a digit-serial architecture in complex programmable logic devices,” Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Design of Mixed-Mode Integrated Circuits and Applications (Cat. No. 99EX303) Jul. 26-28, 1999, pp. 147-150.
Texas Instruments Inc., “TMS320C54x DSP Reference Set, vol. 1: CPU and Peripherals”, Literature No. SPRU131F, Apr. 1999, pp. 2-1 through 2-16 and 4-1 through 4-29.
Thapliyal, H., et al., “Combined Integer and Floating Point Multiplication Architecture (CIFM) for FPGSs and Its Reversible Logic Implementation”, Proceedings MWSCAS 2006, Puerto Rico, 5 pages, Aug. 2006.
Thapliyal, H., et al., “Combined Integer and Variable Precision (CIVP) Floating Point Multiplication Architecture for FPGAs”, Proceedings of the 2007 International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Processing Techniques and Applications (PDPTA'07), Las Vegas, US, vol. 1, pp. 449-450, Jun. 2007.
Tisserand, A., et al., “An on-line arithmetic based FPGA for low power custom computing,” Field Programmable Logic and Applications, 9th International Workshop, FPL'99, Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 1673) Lysaght, P., et al., eds., Aug. 30-Sep. 1, 1999, pp. 264-273.
Tralka, C., “Symbiosis of DSP and PLD,” Elektronik, vol. 49, No. 14 , Jul. 11, 2000, pp. 84-96.
Underwood, K. “FPGAs vs. CPUs: Trends in Peak Floating-Point Performance,” Proceedings of the 2004 ACM-SIGDA 12th International Symposium on Field Programmable Gate Arrays, pp. 171-180, Feb. 22-24, 2004.
Valls, J., et al., “A Study About FPGA-Based Digital Filters,” Signal Processing Systems, 1998, SIPS 98, 1998 IEEE Workshop, Oct. 10, 1998, pp. 192-201.
“Virtex-II 1.5V Field-Programmable Gate Arrays”, Xilinx, Jan. 25, 2001, module 2 of 4.
“Virtex-II 1.5V Field-Programmable Gate Arrays”, Xilinx, Apr. 2, 2001, module 1 of 4.
“Virtex-II 1.5V Field-Programmable Gate Arrays”, Xilinx, Apr. 2, 2001, module 2 of 4.
Vladimirova, T. et al., “Floating-Point Mathematical Co-Processor for a Single-Chip On-Board Computer,” MAPLD'03 Conference, D5, Sep. 2003.
Wajih, E.-H.Y. et al., “Efficient Hardware Architecture of Recursive Karatsuba-Ofman Multiplier,” 3rd International Conference on Design and Technology of Integrated Systems in Nanoscale Era, 6 pgs, Mar. 2008.
Walters, A.L., “A Scaleable FIR Filter Implementation Using 32-bit Floating-Point Complex Arithmetic on ,a FPGA Based Custom Computing Platform,” Allison L. Walters, Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Jan. 30, 1998.
Weisstein, E.W., “Karatsuba Multiplication,” MathWorld—A Wolfram Web Resource (Dec. 9, 2007), accessed Dec. 11, 2007 at http:--mathworld.wolfram.com-KaratsubaMultiplication.html.
Wenzel, L., “Field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) to replace digital signal processor integrated circuits,” Elektronik , vol. 49, No. 5, Mar. 7, 2000, pp. 78-86.
“Xilinx Unveils New FPGA Architecture to Enable High-Performance, 10 Million System Gate Designs”, Xilinx, Jun. 22, 2000.
“Xilinx Announces DSP Algorithms, Tools and Features for Virtex-II Architecture”, Xilinx, Nov. 21, 2000.
Xilinx Inc., “Virtex-II 1.5V Field-Programmable Gate Arrays”, Advance Product Specification, DS031-2 (v1.9), Nov. 29, 2001, Module 2 of 4, pp. 1-39.
Xilinx Inc., “Using Embedded Multipliers”, Virtex-II Platform FPGA Handbook, UG002 (v1.3), Dec. 3, 2001, pp. 251-257.
Xilinx, Inc., “A 1D Systolic FIR,” copyright 1994-2002, downloaded from http:--www.iro.umontreal.ca-˜aboulham-F6221-Xilinx%20A%201D%20systolic%20FIR.htm.
Xilinx, Inc., “The Future of FPGA's,” White Paper, available Nov. 14, 2005 for download from http:--www.xilinx.com-prs—rls,5yrwhite.htm.
Xilinx Inc., “XtremeDSP Design Considerations User Guide,” v 1.2, Feb. 4, 2005.
Xilinx Inc., “Complex Multiplier v2.0”, DS291 Product Specification/Datasheet, Nov. 2004.
Xilinx, Inc., “Virtex-5 ExtremeDSP Design Considerations,” User Guide UG193, v2.6, 114 pages, Oct. 2007.
Xilinx, Inc., “Implementing Barrel Shifters Using Multipliers”, p. 1-4, Aug. 17, 2004.
Zhou, G. et al., “Efficient and High-Throughput Implementations of AES-GCM on FPGAs,” International Conference on Field-Programmable Technology, 8 pgs., Dec. 2007.
de Dinechin F.,et al., “FPGA-Specific Custom Arithmetic Datapath Design: LIP Research Report RR2010-34,” Dec. 2010, 8 pages.
IEEE Standard for Binary Floating-Point Arithmetic, ANSI/IEEE Standard, Std 754, 1985, pp. 1-14.
IEEE Standard for Floating-Point Arithmetic, IEEE Std 754, 2008, pp. 1-58.
Langhammer, “Floating Point Datapath Synthesis for FPGAs ” IEEE International Conference on Field Programmable Logic and Applications, 2008 (FPL 2008), pp. 355-360 (Sep. 8-10, 2008).