This invention relates to a technique for decoding a received signal vector in a multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) data transmission or storage system, where the receiver may receive multiple instances of the same transmitted signal vector.
In a data transmission or storage system, it is desirable for information, often grouped into packets, to be accurately received at a destination. A transmitter at or near the source sends the information provided by the source via a signal or signal vector. A receiver at or near the destination processes the signal sent by the transmitter. The medium, or media, between the transmitter and receiver, through which the information is sent, may corrupt the signal such that the receiver is unable to correctly reconstruct the transmitted information. Therefore, given a transmission medium, sufficient reliability is obtained through careful design of the transmitter and receiver, and of their respective components.
There are many strategies for designing the transmitter and receiver. When the channel characteristics are known, the transmitter and receiver often implement signal processing techniques, such as transmitter precoders and receiver equalizers, to reduce or remove the effects caused by the channel and effectively recover the transmitted signal. Intersymbol interference (ISI) is one example of a channel effect that may be approximately eliminated using signal processing.
However, not all sources of signal corruption are caused from deterministic sources such as ISI. Non-deterministic sources, such as noise sources, may also affect the signal. Due to noise and other factors, signal processing techniques may not be entirely effective at eliminating adverse channel effects on their own. Therefore, designers often add redundancy in the data stream in order to correct errors that occur during transmission. The redundancy added to the data stream is determined based on an error correction code, which is another design variable. Common error correction codes include Reed-Solomon and Golay codes.
One straightforward way to implement a code is to use forward error correction (FEC). The transmitter encodes the data according to an error correction code and transmits the encoded information. Upon reception of the data, the receiver decodes the data using the same error correction code, ideally eliminating any errors.
Another way to implement a code for error correction is to use automatic repeat request (ARQ). Unlike FEC, ARQ schemes use error-detecting rather than error-correcting codes. The ARQ transmitter encodes data based on an error-detecting code, such as a cyclic redundancy check (CRC) code. After decoding the data based on the error-detecting code, if an error is detected, the receiver sends a request to the transmitter to retransmit that codeword. Thus, ARQ protocols require a forward channel for communication from transmitter to receiver and a back channel for communication from receiver to transmitter. Ultimately, the receiver will not accept a packet of data until there are no errors detected in the packet.
Finally, FEC and ARQ may be combined into what is known as hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ). There are at least three standard HARQ protocols. HARQ type-I typically uses a code that is capable of both error-correction and error-detection. For example, a codeword may be constructed by first protecting the message with an error-detecting code, such as a CRC code, and then further encoding the CRC-protected message with an error-correcting code, such as a Reed-Solomon, Golay, convolutional, turbo, or low-density parity check (LDPC) code. When the receiver receives such a code, it first attempts FEC by decoding the error correction code. If, after error detection, there are still errors present, the receiver will request a retransmission of that packet. Otherwise, it accepts the received vector.
HARQ type-II and type-III are different from HARQ type-I, because the data sent on retransmissions of a packet are not the same as the data that was sent originally. HARQ type-II and type-III utilize incremental redundancy in successive retransmissions. That is, the first transmission uses a code with low redundancy. The code rate of a code is defined as the proportion of bits in the vector that carry information and is a metric for determining the throughput of the information. Therefore, the low redundancy code used for the first transmission of a packet has a high code rate, or throughput, but is less powerful at correcting errors. If errors are detected in the first packet, the second transmission is used to increase the redundancy, and therefore the error correcting capability, of the code. For example, if the first transmission uses a code with a code rate of 0.80, a retransmission may add enough extra redundancy to reduce the overall code rate to 0.70. The redundancy of the code may be increased by transmitting extra parity bits or by retransmitting a subset of the bits from the original transmission. If each retransmission can be decoded by itself, the system is HARQ type-III. Otherwise, the system is HARQ type-II.
It is beneficial for an ARQ or HARQ receiver to utilize data from multiple transmissions of a packet, because even packets that contain errors carry some amount of information about the transmitted packet. However, due to system complexity, and in particular decoder complexity, many practical schemes only use data from a small, fixed number of transmissions. Therefore, it would be desirable to provide a system or method for effectively utilizing information from an arbitrary number of transmitted packets that does not drastically increase the complexity of the system.
Accordingly, systems and methods for reliable transmission in multiple-input multiple-output systems are disclosed, where a receiver obtains multiple signal vectors from the same transmit signal vector and combines them prior to decoding.
The transmitter, which has Nt outputs, may send an Nt-dimensional signal vector to the receiver. The receiver, which has Nr inputs, may receive an Nr-dimensional signal vector corresponding the Nt-dimensional transmit vector. In accordance with one aspect of the invention, the transmitter sends the same signal vector multiple times to the receiver according to some protocol. Two protocols that may be used are HARQ type-I and repetition coding, or a combination of the two.
In one embodiment of the present invention, when the receiver has N≧1 received vectors from the same transmit signal, the receiver concatenates the received signal vectors into one NNr-dimensional vector. The receiver may decode the combined vector directly using a decoder, such as a maximum-likelihood decoder.
In a second embodiment of the invention, the N channel response matrices, also referred to as channel matrices, which define how each of the channels alter the transmitted signal in a noiseless scenario, are also concatenated into a single NNr×Nt matrix. A preprocessor processes the concatenated channel response matrix, also called the concatenated channel matrix. Then, rather than directly decoding the concatenated NNr-dimensional received vector, the concatenated received vector is equalized according to information obtained from preprocessing the concatenated channel matrix. The result of the equalization operation is a processed signal vector that may be decoded using the same decoder no matter how large or small N is. Thus, the complexity of the receiver may be drastically reduced.
The above and other objects and advantages of the invention will be apparent upon consideration of the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference characters refer to like parts throughout, and in which:
The disclosed invention provides a technique in a multiple-input multiple-output data transmission or storage system to decode a signal vector at a receiver, where the receiver may receive multiple signal vectors from the same transmitted signal vector.
In one embodiment,
Returning to
One embodiment of transmitter 102 is shown in
Modulators 304 group the incoming bits into symbols, which are mapped and converted to signals according to a signal constellation set and carrier signal. In one embodiment of the invention, modulator 304 uses quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM). Each symbol is mapped to a signal point in the QAM signal constellation set, where the signal points are differentiated from one another by phase and/or magnitude. For example,
Similarly,
In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, transmitter 102 sends the same vector, x, multiple times according to a protocol that is also known and followed by receiver 112. Depending on the protocol, there may be additional components in transmitter 102 that are not shown in
Even though x is transmitted, receiver 112 in
yi=HX+ni 1≦i≦N (1)
For clarity,
In one embodiment, noise sources 108 may be modeled as additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) sources. In this case, noise sources 108 are independent and identically distributed (i.i.d). That is, the noise that affects any of the Nr components in any ni does not affect the noise for any other component in ni. Also, all of the noise sources have the same probabilistic characteristics. Furthermore, each component of ni has zero mean and is random in terms of both magnitude and phase, where the magnitude and the phase are also independent. This type of noise source is called an i.i.d. zero mean circularly symmetric complex Gaussian (ZMCSCG) noise source. If the variance of each component is N0, then the conditional probability distribution function (pdf) of the received signal, Pr{y|x,H}, is given by
Equation (2) will be used with reference to maximum-likelihood decoding discussed in greater detail below in connection with
Receiver 112 may use one or more of the N received copies of x to determine the information that was transmitted. Receiver 112 may combine multiple received vectors into a single vector for decoding, thereby utilizing more than one, and possibly all, of the transmitted signal vectors. The combining scheme disclosed in the present invention will be discussed in greater detail below in connection with
In one embodiment of the invention, receiver 112 receives multiple instances of a common transmit vector using a retransmission protocol. For example, the transmitter and receiver may use a HARQ type-I protocol. The flow chart of the steps taken by transmitter 102 and receiver 112 are shown in
Therefore, it should be understood that
In a second embodiment of the invention, the transmitter sends a signal vector, x, a fixed number of times, irrespective of the presence of errors. For example, the receiver may obtain N transmissions of x from repetition coding. N copies of x are transmitted simultaneously, or within some interval of time. The receiver combines y1, . . . , yN, and decodes the combination. Repetition coding may be useful when there is no feasible backchannel for the receiver to send retransmission requests.
HARQ type-I and repetition coding are two protocols that may be used in different embodiments of the present invention. Alternatively, repetition coding and HARQ can be combined such that multiple vectors are received at 500 before combining and decoding at 502. The invention, however, is not limited to the two protocols and their combination mentioned here.
Currently, the IEEE 802.16e standard uses HARQ and repetition coding, so these particular protocols merely illustrate embodiments of the invention. Any protocol that allows the receiver to receive multiple copies of the same transmitted vector fall within the scope of the present invention.
For single input, single output (SISO) systems, where Nt=Nr=1, one way to implement the combiner of
Note that HARQ type-II and HARQ type-III are not applicable to symbol-level combining, as described above. The symbols being transmitted are not always the same in successive transmissions, because HARQ type-II and HARQ type-III utilize incremental redundancy and therefore change the bit stream being transmitted.
The extension from SISO to general MIMO systems for decoding multiple received vectors for the same transmit vector is not straightforward. Thus, the present invention discloses a different form of symbol-level combining, called Concatenation-Assisted Symbol-Level (CASL) combining, that is extendable to MIMO systems.
When the system of
y1=H1x+n1, (3)
the concatenation steps performed by combiners 1002 and 1000 are trivial. Vector 1006 is simply y1, and vector 1008 is simply H1. The ML decoder 1004 may estimate the Nt×1 common transmitted signal vector 104 from the Nr×1 signal vector 1006. For clarity, the input/output relationship of the decoder when only one signal vector has been received is shown in
When the system of
{tilde over (y)}=[y1Ty2T . . . yNT]T (4)
ñ=[n1Tn2T . . . nNT]T (5)
{tilde over (H)}=[H1TH2T . . . HNT]T (6)
{tilde over (y)} and ñ are the NNr×1 concatenated received signal vector and concatenated noise vector, respectively, and {tilde over (H)} is the NNr×Nt concatenated channel matrix. After concatenation, the new channel model for the system is shown in equation (8). For clarity,
yi=Hix+ni, i=1, . . . , N. (7)
{tilde over (y)}={tilde over (H)}x+ñ. (8)
Following concatenation, decoder 1004 estimates the transmitted signal from the NNr×1 signal vector {tilde over (y)} 706 using the ML metric, ∥{tilde over (y)}−{tilde over (H)}x∥2, as previously defined. For clarity, the input/output relationship of a decoder with N received vectors is shown in
Therefore,
Two detailed embodiments of
When only one signal vector has been received by the system in
Using the channel information provided by combiner/preprocessor 1400, signal processor 1412 multiplies the received vector by Q1*, where Q1* is the transpose of Q1, yielding
Equation (12) follows from equation (11) because Q1*Q1=INt, where INt is the Nt×Nt identity matrix, when Q1 has orthonormal columns.
Since only one vector is received by the receiver in
When multiple signal vectors (N>1) have been received by the system in
where {tilde over (Q)} is an NNr×Nt matrix with orthonormal columns, and {tilde over (R)} is an Nr×Nt upper triangular matrix. Accordingly, concatenated received signal vector 1406 can be represented as
where {tilde over (Q)} and {tilde over (R)} are defined in equation (14) and ñ is a noise vector defined in equation (5). Following concatenation, signal processor 1412 multiplies concatenated received vector 1406 by {tilde over (Q)}*, yielding
Since multiple vectors have been received by the receiver in
There is no loss of information from the operation performed by equalizer 1412, namely multiplying equation (16) by {tilde over (Q)}*. This is because the Nt columns of {tilde over (Q)}, which span the same space as the columns of {tilde over (H)}, can be thought of as an NNr dimensional orthonormal basis for the Nt dimensional subspace where the transmitted signal lies. By multiplication of {tilde over (Q)}*, the dimension of the signal and noise vectors are reduced from NNr to Nt. The dimension of the transmitted signal vector was originally Nt, so there is no loss of information from the multiplication by {tilde over (Q)}*. Furthermore, the noise parts lying in the reduced dimension do not affect the decoding process. Therefore, since
Because of the multiplication by {tilde over (Q)}*, which is performed by signal processor 1412, the size of the signal processor output, vector 1414 or {tilde over (Q)}*{tilde over (y)}, is reduced to Nt. This is the same dimension as when only one signal vector is received. Therefore, the dimension of the input to ML decoder 1404 for N>1 is the same as the dimension of the basic decoder, which enables the same decoder to be used for arbitrary N. Thus, by processing the combined signal with {tilde over (Q)}* prior to decoding, the complexity of decoder 1404 may be drastically reduced.
A second embodiment of the block diagram in
When only one signal vector has been received by the system in
y1=H1x+n1. (19)
Concatenation by combiner/preprocessor 1500 is also trivial. However, combiner/preprocessor 1500 also preprocesses channel matrix 1508, which is simply H1 in this case, to supply appropriate information to signal processor 1512. In particular, it determines the inverse of the channel matrix, H1−1. Signal processor 1512 uses the inverse to perform zero-forcing equalization on vector 1408. It multiplies vector 1408 by H1−1, yielding
Note from equation (21) that equalizer 1512 produces the transmitted signal, x, with additive, potentially correlated noise.
Since only one signal vector is received by
One valuable aspect of the zero-forcing technique employed by the system in
The subscript k indexes the kth element of a vector, and the subscript k,k indexes the (k,k)th element of a matrix. Since x has a dimension of Nt, k takes on the values 1, . . . , Nt, and the metric is implemented for each of the Nt signals.
Now considering the case with N received signal vectors (N≧2), the channel model can again be expressed as
{tilde over (y)}={tilde over (H)}x+ñ, (25)
where the components of equation (25) are shown more clearly in
The zero-forcing equalizer 1512 attempts to recover the transmitted signal vector by multiplying the received vector in equation (25) by the pseudo-inverse, {tilde over (H)}†. The result of the equalizer is
Note from equation (27) that equalizer 1512 produces the transmitted signal, x, with additive, potentially correlated noise.
Since the receiver of
The subscript k indexes the kth element of a vector, and the subscript k,k indexes the (k,k)th element of a matrix. Since x has a dimension of Nt, k takes on the values 1, . . . , Nt, and the metric is implemented for each of the Nt signals.
Because of the multiplication by {tilde over (H)}† performed by signal processor 1512, the size of the signal processor output, vector 1514 or {tilde over (H)}†{tilde over (y)}, is reduced to Nt. This is the same dimension as when only one signal vector is received. Therefore, the dimension of the input to ML decoder 1504 for N>1 is the same as the dimension of the basic decoder, which enables the same decoder to be used for arbitrary N. Thus, by processing the combined signal with {tilde over (H)}† prior to decoding, the complexity of the decoder 1504 may be drastically reduced.
Similar to the ML case above, QR decomposition may also be performed on the channel matrix in the zero-forcing case to reduce computation complexity. Before combiner/preprocessor 1500 computes the pseudo-inverse of the combined channel matrix, it factors the matrix, {tilde over (H)}, into a matrix with orthonormal columns, {tilde over (Q)}, and a square, upper-triangular matrix {tilde over (R)}:
Following QR decomposition, combiner/preprocessor 1500 calculates the inverse of {tilde over (Q)}{tilde over (R)}, which is {tilde over (R)}−1{tilde over (Q)}*.
Signal processor uses the inverse to perform zero-forcing equalization on vector 1408. It multiplies vector 1408 by {tilde over (R)}−1{tilde over (Q)}*, yielding
Accordingly, the metric implemented by decoder 1504 becomes
The subscript k indexes the kth element of a vector, and the subscript k,k indexes the (k,k)th element of a matrix. Since x has a dimension of Nt, k takes on the values 1, . . . , Nt, and the metric is implemented for each of the Nt signals.
The above embodiments described in connection with
Referring now to
Referring now to
The HDD 1600 may communicate with a host device (not shown) such as a computer, mobile computing devices such as personal digital assistants, cellular phones, media or MP3 players and the like, and/or other devices via one or more wired or wireless communication links 1608. The HDD 1600 may be connected to memory 1609 such as random access memory (RAM), low latency nonvolatile memory such as flash memory, read only memory (ROM) and/or other suitable electronic data storage.
Referring now to
The DVD drive 1610 may communicate with an output device (not shown) such as a computer, television or other device via one or more wired or wireless communication links 1617. The DVD 1610 may communicate with mass data storage 1618 that stores data in a nonvolatile manner. The mass data storage 1618 may include a hard disk drive (HDD). The HDD may have the configuration shown in
Referring now to
The HDTV 1620 may communicate with mass data storage 1627 that stores data in a nonvolatile manner such as optical and/or magnetic storage devices for example hard disk drives HDD and/or DVDs. At least one HDD may have the configuration shown in
Referring now to
The present invention may also be implemented in other control systems 1640 of the vehicle 1630. The control system 1640 may likewise receive signals from input sensors 1642 and/or output control signals to one or more output devices 1644. In some implementations, the control system 1640 may be part of an anti-lock braking system (ABS), a navigation system, a telematics system, a vehicle telematics system, a lane departure system, an adaptive cruise control system, a vehicle entertainment system such as a stereo, DVD, compact disc and the like. Still other implementations are contemplated.
The powertrain control system 1632 may communicate with mass data storage 1646 that stores data in a nonvolatile manner. The mass data storage 1046 may include optical and/or magnetic storage devices for example hard disk drives HDD and/or DVDs. At least one HDD may have the configuration shown in
Referring now to
The cellular phone 1650 may communicate with mass data storage 1664 that stores data in a nonvolatile manner such as optical and/or magnetic storage devices for example hard disk drives HDD and/or DVDs. At least one HDD may have the configuration shown in
Referring now to
The set top box 1680 may communicate with mass data storage 1690 that stores data in a nonvolatile manner. The mass data storage 1690 may include optical and/or magnetic storage devices for example hard disk drives HDD and/or DVDs. At least one HDD may have the configuration shown in
Referring now to
The media player 1700 may communicate with mass data storage 1710 that stores data such as compressed audio and/or video content in a nonvolatile manner. In some implementations, the compressed audio files include files that are compliant with MP3 format or other suitable compressed audio and/or video formats. The mass data storage may include optical and/or magnetic storage devices for example hard disk drives HDD and/or DVDs. At least one HDD may have the configuration shown in
The foregoing describes systems and methods for decoding a signal vector, where the receiver may obtain receive multiple instances of the same transmit signal vector. The above described embodiments of the present invention are presented for the purposes of illustration and not of limitation. Furthermore, the present invention is not limited to a particular implementation. The invention may be implemented in hardware, such as on an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) or on a field-programmable gate array (FPGA). The invention may also be implement in software.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/354,527, filed Jan. 20, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,320,509, which claims the benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/724,882, filed Mar. 16, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,121,209, and U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 60/820,285, filed Jul. 25, 2006, 60/820,434, filed Jul. 26, 2006, and 60/821,767, filed Aug. 8, 2006, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6185258 | Alamouti et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6567388 | Tomcik et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6687492 | Sugar et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6778619 | Zangi et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6868520 | Fauconnier | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6892341 | Golitschek et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6967598 | Mills | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7031419 | Piirainen | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7194237 | Sugar et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7295624 | Onggosanusi et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7308026 | Purho | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7308047 | Sadowsky | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7362815 | Lindskog et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7366247 | Kim et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7382841 | Ohtaki et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7386079 | Skog et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7428269 | Sampath et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7489746 | Awater et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7502432 | Catreux et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7526038 | McNamara | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7539274 | Catreux et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7548592 | Wight | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7554985 | Ihm et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7567583 | Miyoshi | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7573806 | Ihm et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7590204 | Monsen | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7593489 | Koshy et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7649953 | Bauch | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7693551 | Ojard | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7729411 | Wang et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7742550 | Olesen et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7751506 | Niu et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7826557 | Li et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8014470 | Lee et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8019023 | Song et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8027402 | Lee et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8090063 | Lee et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8279966 | Lee et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8320509 | Lee et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8379743 | Bury | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8411778 | Lee et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8498195 | Lee et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
20030185295 | Yousef | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040181419 | Davis et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050226239 | Nishida et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060107167 | Jeong et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060165192 | Ito | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060251156 | Grant et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060274836 | Sampath et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070155433 | Ito et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070268988 | Hedayat et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070291882 | Park et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080025427 | Lee et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080025429 | Lee et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080025443 | Lee et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080037670 | Lee et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080049865 | Blankenship et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080063103 | Lee et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080144733 | ElGamal et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080159375 | Park et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080198941 | Song et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090031183 | Hoshino et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090063106 | Burg et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090080579 | Fujii | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090252236 | Li et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090307558 | Lee et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100014601 | Mo et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20130163657 | Lee et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 271 835 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1 501 210 | Jan 2005 | EP |
1 608 081 | Dec 2005 | EP |
WO 0052873 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 02067491 | Aug 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
802.16e: IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area networks Part 16: Air Interface for Fixed and Mobile Broadband Wireless Access Systems Amendment for Physical and Medium Access Control Layers for Combined Fixed and Mobile Operation in Licensed Bands, pp. 1-3, 485-495, 635, and 649-650 (Feb. 2006). |
Acolatse, Kodzovi et al. “Space Time Block Coding HARQ scheme for Highly Frequency Selective Channels” 2007 IEEE International Conference on Communications, pp. 4416-4420 (Jun. 24, 2007). |
Acolatse, Kodzovi et al. “An Alamouti-based Hybrid-ARQ Scheme for MIMO Systems” 14th IST Mobile and Wireless Communications, Dresden (Jun. 2005). |
Arkhipov, Alexander et al. “OFDMA-CDM Performance Enchancement by Combining H-ARQ and Interference Cancellation” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 24, No. 6, pp. 1199-1207 (Jun. 2006). |
Chase, David. “Code Combining—A Maximum-Likelihood Decoding Approach for Combining an Arbitrary Number of Noisy Packets” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. Comm-33 No. 5, pp. 385-393 (May 1985). |
Chiang, Ping-Hung et al. “Performance of 2IMO Differentially Transmit-Diversity Block Coded OFDM Systems in Doubly Selective Channels” Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005, pp. 3768-3773 (Nov. 11, 2005). |
Cioffi, John et al. “Generalized decision-feedback equalization for packet transmission with Isi and gaussian noise”, Communications, computation, control and signal processing: a tribute to Thomas Kailath, pp. 79-127 (1997). |
Davis, Linda M. “Scaled and decoupled Cholesky and QR Decompositions with Application to Spherical MIMO Detection” IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking, vol. 1, pp. 326-331 (2003). |
Dekorsy, Armin “A Cutoff Rate based Cross-Layer Metric for MIMO-HARQ Transmission” IEEE 16th Internal Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, vol. 4, pp. 2166-2170 (2005). |
Gharavi-Alkhansari, Mohammad et al. “Constellation Space Invariance of Space-Time Block Codes with Application to Optimal Antenna Subset Selection”, Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications, pp. 269-273 (2003). |
Ginis, George et al. “On the Relation Between V-BLAST and the GDFE”, IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 5, No. 9, pp. 364-366 (Sep. 2001). |
Hassibi, Babak “An Efficient Square-Root Algorithm for BLAST”, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 2, pp. 737-740 (2000). |
Jang et al. “An Efficient Symbol-Level Combining Scheme for MIMO Systems With Hybrid ARQ”, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 8, No. 5, pp. 2443-2451, May 26, 2009. |
Jang et al., “Optimal Combining Schemes for MIMO Systems with Hybrid ARQ”, ISIT 2007, IEEE International Symposium, Jun. 24-Jun. 29, 2007, pp. 2286-2290. |
Kim, Woo Tai et al. Performance of STBC with Turbo Code in HARQ Scheme for Mobile Communication System. Telecommunications, 2003. ICT 2003. 10th International Conference, pp. 85-59 (Feb. 23, 2003). |
Koike T., et al. “Hybrid ARQ scheme suitable for coded MIMO transmission” Communications, IEEE International Conference, Paris, France, pp. 2919-2923 (Jun. 20, 2004). |
Krishnaswamy, Dilip, et al. “Multi-Level Weighted Combining of Retransmitted Vectors in Wireless Communications.” IEEE VTC. Sep. 2006. |
Liu, Peng et al. “A New Efficient MIMO Detection Algorithm based on Cholesky Decomposition,” The 6th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, vol. 1, pp. 264-268 (2004). |
Nagareda R et al. “OFDM mobile packet transmission system with multiuser detection and metric combining ARQ” Vehicular Technology Conference, 2004 VTC2004-Fall. 2004 IEEE 60th Los Angeles, CA USA, pp. 709-713 (Sep. 26, 2004). |
Nakajima, Akinori et al. “Iterative Joint PIC and 2D MMSE-FDE for Turbo-coded HARQ with SC-MIMO Multiplexing” IEEE 63rd Vehicular Technology Conference, vol. 5, pp. 2503-2507 (May 2006). |
Nakajima, Akinori et al. “Throughput of Turbo Coded Hybrid ARQ Using Single-carrier MIMO Multiplexing” IEEE 61st Vehicular Technology Conference, vol. 1, pp. 610-614 (2005). |
Oh, Mi-Kyung et al. “Efficient Hybrid ARQ with Space-Time Coding and Low-Complexity Decoding” IEEE Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 4, pp. 589-592 (2004). |
Onggosanusi, Eko N. et al. “Hybrid AQ Transmission and Combining for MIMO systems” IEEE, 2003. |
Rontogiannis, Athanasios A. et al. “An Adaptive Decision Feedback Equalizer for Time-Varying Frequency Selective MIMO Channels” IEEE 7th Workshop on Selective MIMO Channels Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications, pp. 1-5 (Jul. 2006). |
Samra H; Zhi Ding “New MIMO ARQ protocols and joint detection via sphere decoding” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing [online], pp. 473-482 (Feb. 28, 2006). |
Samra Harvino, Ding Zhi “Sphere decoding for retransmission diversity in MIMO flat-fading channels” ICASSP IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust. Speech Signal Process [online], pp. 585-588 (May 17, 2004). |
Schmitt M. P. “Improved retransmission strategy for hybrid ARQ schemes employing TCM” Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 1999 IEEE New Orleans, LA, pp. 1226-1228 (Sep. 21, 1999). |
Theofilakos, Panagiotis et al. “Frobenius Norm Based Receive Antenna Subarray Formation for MIMO Systems”, First European Conference on Antennas and Propagation, pp. 1-5 (2006). |
Tirkkonen, O et al. “Square-Matrix Embeddable Space-Time Block Codes for Complex Signal Constellations,” IEEE Trans. Info. Theory, vol. 48, pp. 384-395 (Feb. 2002). |
Tong, Wen et al. Soft packet combing for STC re-transmission to improve H-ARQ performance in MIMO mode. Proposal for IEEE 802.16 Broadband Wireless Access Working Group, pp. 1-5 (Jul. 7, 2004). |
Wolniansky, P.W. et al. “V-BLAST: An Architecture for Realizing Very High Data Rates Over the Rich-Scattering Wireless Channel”, URSI International Symposium on Signals, Systems, and Electronics, pp. 295-300 (1998). |
Wu, J. et al., “The Performance of TCM 16-QAM with Equalization, Diversity, and Slow Frequency Hopping for Wideband Mobile Communications”, 1998, Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communication, vol. 3, pp. 1346-1350. |
Wübben, Dirk et al. “MMSE Extension of V-BLAST based on Sorted QR Decomposition” IEEE 58th Vehicular Technology Conference, vol. 1, pp. 508-512 (2003). |
Zhou, S. et al., Subspace-Based (Semi-) Blind Channel Estimation for Block Precoded Space-Time OFDM, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 50, No. 5, May 2002, pp. 1215-1228. |
Zhang, Y. et al. “MMSE Linear Detector for Space-Time Transmit Diversity over Fast Fading Channels”, The 14th IEEE 2003 International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communication Proceedings, pp. 2388-2392, 2003. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130083836 A1 | Apr 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60821767 | Aug 2006 | US | |
60820434 | Jul 2006 | US | |
60820285 | Jul 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13354527 | Jan 2012 | US |
Child | 13683910 | US | |
Parent | 11724882 | Mar 2007 | US |
Child | 13354527 | US |