The invention concerns wastewater treatment, and in particular is concerned with a drum screen assembly for filtering out particulate matter prior to entry into a treatment process, particularly a biological sewage treatment system. This is especially important upstream of a membrane biological reactor system (MBR).
Dual stage screening is considered the best defense to protect membrane biological reactors (MBR) systems. The problems associated with dual stage screening are primarily the cost and size requirements associated with two separate screens and a grit (screenings) removal system. Serially combining a screen and a finer screen in a single machine reduces the footprint and operating costs.
U.S. Pat. No. 9,511,311 describes a filtration tank with horizontal cylindrical drum screens serially connected on a common longitudinal axis where the incoming water flows inside-out through the first screen, around a dividing wall, then outside-in through the second, finer screen to enter the interior of the second screen before exiting the tank.
The outside-in flow pattern results in the screenings collecting on the outside surface of the second screen. As the drum rotates out of the water the screenings are prone to sloughing off prior to reaching the wash system and collection hopper intended to remove the screenings from the filtration tank. The resulting accumulation of screenings in the filtration tank is detrimental to the performance and maintenance of the screen.
This invention addresses that problem while further reducing the footprint of the machine by eliminating the dividing wall between the two screens and increasing the diameter of the second screen, such that the first screen can be nested concentrically within the second screen. With the entry to the second screen sealed such that the incoming water flows inside-out through the first screen into the annulus between the cylindrical screens and then continues to flow inside-out through the second, finer screen before exiting the tank, the screenings can be collected on the inside surface of both screens, where they can efficiently be conveyed to the collection hopper by lifts inside the drums.
Increasing the diameter of the second screen relative to the diameter of the first screen also increases the effective filtration area of the second screen. The finer screen is more restrictive to the flow of water due to the smaller openings. Increasing the effective area of the finer screen thus improves the hydraulic performance of the system.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,433,849 describes a dual drum wastewater screen apparatus which includes a first inner screen and a second outer screen. Both screens are wedge wire drum screens, concentrically arranged, with wastewater fed into the inner screen, filtered by that screen and then filtered by the outer screen. Helical scrapers are used to clear the debris collected on the interior of each screen. In the system of the '849 patent the water can overflow out the open ends of the two drums if the wedge wire becomes blinded with debris. Thus, wastewater bypasses the apparatus without any screening. Further, the inflow to the apparatus is a deluge type of water feed. In addition, the drums are supported by outer trunions or drives, rather than being rotatable on a central shaft. Further, the system of the '849 patent does not employ a conventional wastewater and hopper system for transferring the debris out from the drums, but rather the debris is cleared with a relatively complex auger or helix debris removal, providing limitations in performance and maintenance.
A primary object of this invention is to improve the efficiency of structure and operation of a dual drum screen system, and thereby reducing overall footprint of the dual screen apparatus, even beyond that of a serial dual system.
In the drawings,
As explained in the patent, the screen 20 of the first drum 12 is a screen with openings of about 3 mm, and the second screen 22 of the drum 16 is of smaller size, ultra-fine screen with opening size of about 1 mm. Disadvantages of this arrangement, including larger footprint, are explained above. In this prior art construction the two drum screens are aligned and coaxial, but not concentric as in the current invention.
The invention is depicted in
The two drums rotate together on a central horizontal shaft indicated schematically in
An inlet for wastewater is shown at 36, through the tank wall and an additional inner wall, if included. The inlet can be a simple opening into the interior 32a of the inner drum screen cylinder, admitting liquid into that interior. As shown, screening lifts 38 are included, for catching debris as the liquid filters through the inner screen. These are essentially shallow ledges or shelves as in a typical drum screen, fixed to the framework of the drum or to the screen.
At or near the top of the interior 32a at the inner screen 32 is a screening collection hopper 40, which can be of conventional construction. A spray wash system includes sprayers 42 just above the drum screen and directly above the collection hopper 40, for washing debris collected on the inner side of the screen down into the hopper, for removal out one end of the apparatus 26, in a manner typical of drum screens.
The filtrate exiting the inner drum screen 32 enters a space 42 between the two drums 32 and 34. From there, the liquid progresses out through the outer screen 34a for discharging into the tank 25. Again, the outer screen includes a screening collection hopper 44 positioned generally centrally, and a set of sprayers 46 to wash collected debris down into the hopper 44, from the inner side of the screen 34a. Like the inner drum 32, the outer drum includes screening lifts 48, a plurality of them running longitudinally along the inner side of the screen. These help bring the collected debris up to a position to be washed down into the collection hopper 44.
An outlet for the filtrate that has passed through the dual filter screens is shown at 50.
For reasons noted above, the outer drum's wetted area should be greater than that of the inner drum, since the outer drum has smaller screen openings. Given the preferred dimensions above, the wetted area of the smaller, inner drum will be about 2375 square inches, while the wetted area of the larger, outer drum will be about 3958 square inches. This produces a ratio of 1.67 between wetted areas of outer and inner drums. If the design liquid level is lowered, this ratio would become greater. The ratio is minimized when H is equal to D2/2, i.e. the liquid depth is at the center of rotation of the drums. This is a preferred ratio for operation when the screen sizes of the inner and outer screens are 6 mm and 0.5 mm respectively. However, other screen sizes and wetted area ratios can be employed, and in another embodiment, preferred screen sizes are 3 mm and 1 mm, respectively, or ranges of about 2-6 mm and 0.5-1.5 mm, respectively.
Further details of the debris removal system are shown in
In
In
The above described preferred embodiments are intended to illustrate the principles of the invention, but not to limit its scope. Other embodiments and variations to these preferred embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art and may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the following claims.
This application claims benefit of provisional application No. 63/341,352, filed May 12, 2022.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63341352 | May 2022 | US |