Patent Grant
11313327
This disclosure relates to turbomachinery for producing thrust to propel an aircraft.
Turbomachines transfer energy between a rotor and a fluid. They may be used for aircraft propulsion by developing thrust. The range and cost of operating an aircraft is largely dependent upon the efficiency of its engines. As energy sources become more scarce, it is desirable to increase the propulsive efficiency of the propulsive turbomachinery. It is also desirable to employ electric machines to drive the turbomachines to reduce the thermal losses and emissions associated with internal combustion engines.
The invention is directed towards axial flow turbomachines for producing thrust to propel an aircraft, and aircraft incorporating the same.
In an aspect, such an axial flow turbomachine comprises an inner duct and an outer duct, both of which are annular and concentric with one another.
The turbomachine further comprises an inner fan located in the inner duct, the inner fan being configured to produce a primary pressurised flow, and an outer fan located in the outer duct, the outer fan being configured to produce a secondary pressurised flow and having a hollow hub through which the inner duct passes.
The outer fan has a diameter of from 2.5 to 3.5 times a diameter of the inner fan.
Embodiments will now be described by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings, which are purely schematic and not to scale, and in which:
An aircraft 101 is illustrated in
Referring again to
In the present embodiment, the electrical generation unit 103 includes an electric machine 201 which is driven by an internal combustion engine. In the present example, the electrical generation unit 103 is configured as a turboelectric generator, in which the internal combustion engine is a gas turbine engine 202, i.e. a Brayton cycle engine. Alternatively, the internal combustion engine could be a piston engine, such as a Diesel cycle engine, or any other type of internal combustion engine, such as those operating in accordance with an Otto or Atkinson cycle.
In an alternative configuration, the aircraft 101 does not include an electrical generation unit 103, but instead includes a battery pack and is hence fully electric.
A schematic of one of the turbomachines 102 is illustrated in
The turbomachine 102 is substantially axisymmetric around its centreline A-A. An inner casing 201 defines the inner radial extent of an inner duct 202, with a flow splitter 203 defining the outer radial extent of the inner duct 202. The flow splitter 203 also defines the inner radial extent of an outer duct 204, with an outer casing 205 defining the outer radial extent of the outer duct 204.
The inner duct 202 and outer duct 204 are thereby annular and concentric with each other with respect to the centreline A-A.
An inner fan 206 is located within the inner duct 202, whilst an outer fan 207 is located within the outer duct 204. In operation, each fan rotates around the centreline A-A. The inner fan 206 produces a primary pressurised flow P, and the outer fan 207 produces a secondary pressurised flow S. Together, the flows P and S produce thrust which propels the aircraft 101. In operation, the primary pressurised flow P and the secondary pressurised flow S exit their respective ducts 202 and 204, whereupon the secondary pressurised flow S substantially shrouds the primary pressurised flow P and reduces the appreciable jet noise of the primary pressurised flow P. This has particular benefits for vehicles which operate in areas where community noise is of concern.
As illustrated in the Figure, the outer fan 207 has a hollow hub 208 through which the inner duct 202 passes.
In the present embodiment, the outer duct 204 has a greater axial extent than the inner duct 202, such that its trailing edge is located axially downstream of the trailing edge of the inner duct 202. In this way, a mixing zone is created. The difference in duct length Δduct, may be adjusted to achieve the desired level of mixing between the primary pressurised flow P and the secondary pressurised flow S.
In an embodiment, Δduct may be from 0 to 14 times the tip radius rT,I of the inner fan 206, i.e. 0<Δduct≤14rT,I. In a specific embodiment, 4rT,I<Δduct≤10rT,I. In another specific embodiment, 6rT,I<Δduct≤8rT,I. In a another specific embodiment, Δduct=7rT,I.
Δduct may be selected to balance the degree of mixing achieved and the losses due to friction. For a given degree of mixing, a shorter Δduct may be achieved by using forced mixing techniques, such as by means of a lobed mixer. Thus for example in such a configuration Δduct may be less than 7 times the tip radius rT,I of the inner fan 206, i.e. 0<Δduct≤7rT,I. In a specific embodiment, 2rT,I<Δduct≤5rT,I. In another specific embodiment, 3rT,I<Δduct≤4rT,I. In another specific embodiment, Δduct=3.5rT,I.
The inventor has discovered that the principle of operation of the turbomachine 102 in this embodiment is therefore similar to that of an ejector. In operation, shear forces between the primary pressurised flow P and secondary pressurised flow S drive a mixing process and a static pressure drop below ambient pressure in the mixing plane.
In a specific embodiment, the inner fan 206 rotates in a direction counter to the direction of rotation of the outer fan 207, i.e. {circumflex over (ω)}I=−{circumflex over (ω)}O. This may assist the mixing of the primary pressurised flow P and the secondary pressurised flow S.
During the mixing process, energy is transferred between the flows and the kinetic energy of the primary pressurised flow P is distributed over a larger mass flow of air. The specific enthalpies of the two flows P and S equalise and the exhaust velocity decreases. This increases the propulsive efficiency of the turbomachine 102.
In an alternative configuration the inner duct 202 is may be the same length or longer than the outer duct 204, i.e. Δduct≤0 and so there is no mixing zone. However, the turbomachine 102 when configured in this way will still exhibit greater thrust than a single fan arrangement having the same pressure ratio and tip speed as the outer fan 207. This is attributable to the greater overall momentum change due to the presence of the inner fan 206.
The outer fan 207 has a swept area AO of from 2 to 20 times greater than the swept area AI of the inner fan 206, i.e. 2AI≤AO≤20AI. The inventor has discovered that this provides a positive thrust gain, i.e. an augmentation factor Φ (which is a measure of the factor of thrust gain achieved versus a single rotor) is greater than 1. In a specific embodiment, the outer fan 207 has a swept area AO of from 4 to 17 times greater than the swept area AI of the inner fan 206, i.e. 4AI≤AO≤17AI. The inventor has determined that this achieves an augmentation factor Φ of from about 1.15 to about 1.45 versus a single fan of the same tip diameter as the outer fan 207. In a specific embodiment, the outer fan 207 has a swept area AO of from 7.5 to 13 times greater than the swept area AI of the inner fan 206, i.e. 7.5AI≤AO≤13AI. The inventor has determined that this achieves an augmentation factor Φ of from about 1.3 to about 1.4 versus a single fan of the same tip diameter as the outer fan 207. In a specific embodiment, the outer fan 207 has a swept area AO that is 9 times greater than the swept area AI of the inner fan 206, i.e. AO=9AI. The inventor has determined that this achieves an augmentation factor Φ of about 1.35 versus a single fan of the same tip diameter as the outer fan 207.
In the present embodiment, the inner fan 206 is driven by an electric machine comprising a rotor 209 and a stator 210. In the specific embodiment of
In an alternative embodiment, the rotor 209 may be an interior rotor, connected to the hub of the inner fan 206 by an appropriate shaft arrangement. In another alternative embodiment, the inner fan 206 may be rim-driven, with the rotor 209 and stator 210 located in the flow splitter 203. In such a case, the rotor 209 may be an interior rotor.
In the present embodiment, the outer fan 207 is driven by an electric machine comprising a rotor 211 and a stator 212. In the specific embodiment of
In an alternative embodiment, the rotor 211 may be an interior rotor, connected to the hub of the outer fan 207 by an appropriate shaft arrangement. In another alternative embodiment, the fan 206 may be rim-driven, with the rotor 211 and stator 212 located in the casing 205. In such a case, the rotor 211 may be an interior rotor.
In the present embodiment, the inner fan 206 and outer fan 207 overlap in an axial sense. However, in alternative embodiments, they may instead only partially overlap, or alternatively not at all. In the present embodiment, the inner fan 206 has a mid-chord line 213 axially forward of the mid-chord line 214 of the outer fan 207. Alternatively, the mid-chord lines may be aligned axially, or instead the mid-chord line 213 may be located rearward of the mid-chord line 214.
The hub-tip ratio of the outer fan 207 vO may be determined as the ratio of the tip radius rH,O to the hub radius rH,O. The hub-tip ratio of the inner fan 206 vI may be determined as the ratio of the tip radius rT,I to the hub radius rH,I. The hub-tip ratios may be determined based on the mean hub and tip radii, should the hade angle at the root of the fans be non-zero, and/or the tip conform to a divergent or convergent duct endwall.
In an embodiment, the outer fan 207 has a hub-tip ratio vO of from 1.6 to 2.2 times that of the inner fan 206, vI, i.e. 1.6vI≤vO≤2.2vI. The inventor has discovered that this minimises the overall impact of tip clearance on the smaller-diameter inner fan 206. Further, the inner fan 206 may rotate at a rate greater than the rate of the outer fan 207, i.e. |ωI|>|ωO|, due to the reduced blade stresses. In a specific embodiment, the outer fan 207 has a hub-tip ratio vO of from 1.6 to 2.0 times that of the inner fan 206, vI, i.e. 1.6vI≤vO≤2.0vI. In another specific embodiment, the outer fan 207 has a hub-tip ratio vO of from 1.6 to 1.8 times that of the inner fan 206, vI, i.e. 1.6vI≤vO≤1.8vI. In another specific embodiment, the outer fan 207 has a hub-tip ratio vO that is 1.6 times that of the inner fan 206, vI, i.e. vO=1.6vI. For example, the outer fan 207 may have a hub-tip ratio vO of 0.4, and the inner fan 206 has a hub-tip ratio vI of 0.25.
In an embodiment, the diameter of the outer fan 207 is from 2.5 to 3.5 times greater than the diameter of the inner fan 206. As will be appreciated this means that the respective radii rT,O and rT,I observe the same relation, i.e. 2.5rT,I≤rT,O≤3.5rT,I. The inventor has discovered that this allows sufficient swept area for the outer fan 207 to operate efficiently, but enough space for the electric machine to be housed in the flow splitter. In a specific embodiment, the diameter of the outer fan 207 is from 2.8 to 3.3 times greater than the diameter of the inner fan 206, i.e. 2.8rT,I≤rT,O≤3.3rT,I. In another specific embodiment, the diameter of the outer fan 207 is 3.2 times greater than the diameter of the inner fan 206, i.e. rT,O=3.2rT,I. The inventor has discovered that this allows for an optimum balance to be struck between the size of the electric machine, and the efficiency of the turbomachine. Further, in the present embodiment in which Δduct is positive, the aforementioned choices of diameters may also optimise the thrust augmentation factor Φ that is obtained.
In an embodiment, the inner fan 206 is configured to operate with a tip speed UT,I that is from 1 to 3 times the tip speed UT,O of the outer fan 207, i.e. UT,O≤UT,I≤3UT,O. The inventor has discovered that this allows the inner fan 206 to operate with a higher pressure ratio whilst, due to the shielding provided by the secondary pressurised flow, not causing excessive jet noise. In a specific embodiment, the inner fan 206 is configured to operate with a tip speed UT,I that is from 1.3 to 2.5 times the tip speed UT,O of the outer fan 207, i.e. 1.3UT,O≤UT,I≤2.5UT,O. In another specific embodiment, is configured to operate with a tip speed that is 1.9 times that of the outer fan 207, i.e. UT,I=1.9UT,O.
In an embodiment, the inner fan 206 is configured to operate at a rate of rotation ωI that is from 3 to 8 times the rate ωO of the outer fan 207, i.e. 3ωO≤8ωO. The inventor has discovered that this maximises the work of the inner fan 206 whilst minimising tip losses and blade stress. In a specific embodiment, the inner fan 206 is configured to operate at a rate of rotation ωI that is from 5 to 7 times the rate ωO of the outer fan 207, i.e. 5ωO≤ωI≤7ωO. In another specific embodiment, the inner fan 206 is configured to operate at a rate of rotation 6 times that of the outer fan 207, i.e. ωI=6ωO.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that whilst the present embodiments of the turbomachine 102 have been described with application to a hybrid- or fully-electric aircraft, the same principles may be applied in embodiments in which the requisite shaft power is provided by another means, such as one or more gas turbine engines. Different rotational rates may, for example, be achieved by use of a gearbox. Alternatively, a combination of a gas turbine and an electric machine may be used to drive one or more of the inner and outer fans.
Various examples have been described, each of which feature various combinations of features. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that, except where clearly mutually exclusive, any of the features may be employed separately or in combination with any other features and the invention extends to and includes all combinations and sub-combinations of one or more features described herein.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1813672 | Aug 2018 | GB | national |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2270615 | Baldwin | Jan 1942 | A |
| 3673802 | Krebs | Jul 1972 | A |
| 3867813 | Leibach | Feb 1975 | A |
| 6148605 | Lardellier | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6209311 | Itoh et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 8100630 | Guemmer | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 20080120839 | Schilling | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20090245998 | Guemmer | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20110030336 | Kuehn et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20120107092 | Terao | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20140030060 | Magowan | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140367510 | Viala et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20170122257 | Sankrithi | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20190017446 | Adams | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190257318 | Vanapalli | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 102001440 | Apr 2011 | CN |
| 107054597 | Aug 2017 | CN |
| 2 101 040 | Sep 2009 | EP |
| 3 060 061 | Jun 2018 | FR |
| 978658 | Dec 1964 | GB |
| 1197711 | Jul 1970 | GB |
| 1321657 | Jun 1973 | GB |
| 2 189 844 | Nov 1987 | GB |
| 2541932 | Mar 2017 | GB |
| 2541932 | Mar 2017 | GB |
| 2018063019 | Apr 2018 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Wendus et al., Follow-On Technology Requirement Study for Advanced Subsonic Transport, 2003, NASA, NASA/CR—2003-212467, p. 8 (Year: 2003) (Year: 2003) (Year: 2003). |
| Waters et al., “Analysis of Turbofan Propulsion System Weight and Dimensions” (1977), NASA TM X-73,199 (Year: 1977) (Year: 1977). |
| Feb. 19, 2020 Extended European Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 19188390.9. |
| Feb. 19, 2020 Extended European Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 19188395.8. |
| Feb. 19, 2020 Extended European Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 19188389.1. |
| Feb. 7, 2020 European Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 19188392. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/527,905, filed Jul. 31, 2019 in the name Harvey. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/528,034, filed Jul. 31, 2019 in the name Harvey. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/528,201, filed Jul. 31, 2019 in the name Harvey. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/528,243, filed Jul. 31, 2019 in the name Harvey. |
| Feb. 21, 2019 Search Report issued in Great Britain Patent Application No. 1813670.5. |
| Feb. 18, 2019 Search Report issued in Great Britain Patent Application No. 1813671.3. |
| Feb. 21, 2019 Search Report issued in Great Britain Patent Application No. 1813672.1. |
| Feb. 12, 2019 Search Report issued in Great Britain Patent Application No. 1813674.7. |
| Feb. 15, 2019 Search Report issued in Great Britain Patent Application No. 1813675.4. |
| Jan. 30, 2020 Extended European Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 19188388.3. |
| Sep. 16, 2021, Non-Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/528,034. |
| Sep. 21, 2021, Non-Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/528,201. |
| Sep. 21, 2021, Non-Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/528,243. |
| Sep. 21, 2021, Non-Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/527,905. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20200102912 A1 | Apr 2020 | US |
