CONCRETE BEAM AND SYSTEM THAT COMPRISES SAID BEAM

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20240209619
  • Publication Number
    20240209619
  • Date Filed
    April 22, 2022
    2 years ago
  • Date Published
    June 27, 2024
    5 months ago
Abstract
A concrete beam includes longitudinal reinforcements so that the cross section cuts through the longitudinal reinforcements and includes transverse reinforcements that surround the longitudinal reinforcements, and at one end a rectangular recess for the fitting and support of the end of the beam on a column. The cross-section includes at each end of the beam according to the transverse direction a lower extension that define in the beam longitudinal flanges for the support of prefabricated floor elements, the beam being provided at each end of a steel profile with an L-section having a first flange arranged on the lower extension and a second flange joined to the transverse reinforcements. Also related is a construction system having a column, a prefabricated slab element, and the beam.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure refers to a concrete beam, of the wide beam type, and to a system comprising said beam. The beam according to the disclosure combines the advantages of steel beams and concrete beams, inventively combining the structural advantages of the former and the low cost and ease of manufacturing of the latter.


The concrete beam of the current disclosure, in its two variants, is designed to function in continuity over the bearings (columns). In the first variant, the beam is designed to function in continuity only after the hardening of the concrete poured in the job, while it functions as simply supported during the erection process. In the second variant, the beam is designed to function in continuity both during the erection process, and after the hardening of the concrete cast in the job.


BACKGROUND

More and more structures are erected with prefabricated elements, as constituent elements of the floor.


The structures erected using prefabricated elements are typically one-way structures, i.e. the prefabricated floor elements are supported at their ends either on bearing walls or frames formed by columns and beams.


Using precast bearing walls for the bearings may be acceptable in some kinds of buildings, particularly if they do not require much flexibility in the layout of spaces. But using frames (beams and columns) is a desirable solution in most cases as it allows for a larger flexibility. However, it is currently not so easy to build this kind of structures with precast frames given the current state of the art of the beams used in this kind of structures. This is because the current beams solutions for structures with precast floor elements are not too competitive in comparison with cast in the job structures.


In these structures, the prefabricated floor elements are supported by beams, which in turn rest on columns, as in most structures. The bays are therefore covered by the beams spanning in one direction, and in another direction by the prefabricated floor elements, which can be, for example, hollow core slabs.


The two most popular solutions for beams in structures with precast floor elements are: precast concrete beams (either reinforced or prestressed), and composite tubular beams, made of an outer tubular body formed by hot-rolled steel plates welded together filled with concrete, normally poured in the job.


One of the main reasons that makes precast concrete beams less competitive against cast in the job construction is that precast beams typically downdrop under the floor soffit at least some 15 to 20 cm (6 to 8 inches), which significantly increases the final depth of the floor.


This downdropping of beams is due in part to the fact that these beams need lateral corbels to support the floor elements, and in part to the fact that these beams are simply supported and need to be deep to minimize deflections.


Composite beams do not have this problem, they allow for flat-soffit floors. But their main drawback is their large consumption of steel, which makes these beams normally expensive when compared to cast in the job construction.


The beams for the support of the floor elements, as it is known, can be made of steel or concrete. Steel beams have excellent structural features, performing well both under tension stresses and compression stresses. In addition, they allow very large spans. A major drawback of steel beams is their high price.


Also, steel beams have a poor performance against fire. Thus, normally additional money has to be invested in protecting steel beams against fire.


However, current state of the art in these beams allows to easily form beams spanning continuously over the bearings (columns) thus improving significantly their performance.


This fact, together with the fact that steel is a material not experiencing long-term deflections, allows for these beams to span quite long.


Concrete beams do not have as much tensile strength capacity. But their cost is much lower. Moreover, concrete beams behave quite good in case of fire. Also, reinforced concrete beams, may be prestressed (precompressed), which allows these structural members to overcome some of their disadvantages (poor tensile strength, and long-term deflections)


In the next three tables are summarized some of the main advantages and disadvantages of the state of the are beams:









TABLE 1







Assessment of main features of state-of-the-


art beams regarding DEFLECTION CONTROL










Continuity of the beam















After cast in
Concrete of
Concrete
OVERALL


BEAMS
During
the job concrete
beam may be
of beam
LONG-TERM


TECHNOLOGY
erection
has hardened
prestressed
is precast
DEFLECTIONS





Conventional
No
No
Yes
Yes
MODERATE


precast


concrete beam


Patent
No
No
Yes
Yes
MODERATE


ES2369678


Patent
Yes
Yes
No
No
LOW


WO9012173


Utility Model
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
LOW


ES1282640U
















TABLE 2







Assessment of main features of state-of-the-art beams regarding STRUCTURAL


CAPACITY AND DETAILING (S*: Shear; F*: Flexure; T*: Torque)












NEGATIVE

REINFORCEMENT
STRENGTH OF



MOMENT
TORQUE
OF BEAM
JUNCTIONS












BEAMS
STRENGTH
STRENGTH
CROSSING
Beam-to-
Beam-to-


TECHNOLOGY
OF BEAM
OF BEAM
THE COLUM
column
beam





Conventional
NONE
LOW
NONE
S*: MED.
S*: NONE


precast



F*: NONE
F*: NONE


concrete beam



T*: NONE
T*: NONE


Patent
NONE
LOW
NONE
S*: MED.
S*: NONE


ES2369678



F*: NONE
F*: NONE






T*: NONE
T*: NONE


Patent
LIMITED
HIGH
LIMITED
S*: HIGH
S*: LOW


WO9012173



F*: HIGH
F*: LOW






T*: HIGH
T*: LOW


Utility Model
LIMITED
LOW
LIMITED
S*: HIGH
S*: LOW


ES1282640U



F*: HIGH
F*: NONE






T*: HIGH
T*: NONE
















TABLE 3







Assessment of main features of state-of-the-art beams regarding


the COST OF BEAMS and the capacity to produce FLAT SOFFITS










Cost considerations
















Usually needs







fire-proofing





products or
Needs


BEAMS
FLAT SOFFIT
Consumption
oversizing
specific
OVERALL


TECHNOLOGY
(or almost)
of steel
the beam
formers
COST





Conventional
NO
Low
No
Yes
LOW


precast
(Down-drop:


concrete beam
15 to 20 cm)


Patent
YES
Moderate
Yes
Yes
MODERATE


ES2369678
(Down-drop:

(only for



4 to 12 mm)

flanges)


Patent
YES
Very High
Yes
No
HIGH


WO9012173
(Down-drop:



1 to 8 cm)


Utility Model
YES
Moderate
Yes
Yes
MODERATE


ES1282640U
(Down-drop:

(only for



5 to 20 mm)

flanges)









If the drawbacks of the current technologies could be overcome, the number of structures erected using prefabricated floor elements could be larger than they currently are, as structures using prefabricated floor elements would become more competitive. The current disclosure aims to solve these drawbacks and subsequently increase the competitiveness of floors made with precast elements as compared to floors completely cast in the job.


SUMMARY

To overcome the drawbacks of the state of the art, the present disclosure proposes a concrete beam in which a longitudinal direction, a transverse direction are defined, and a vertical direction is defined that is perpendicular to the longitudinal direction and to the transverse direction, the beam comprising longitudinal reinforcements so that the cross section of the beam, which is in the plane defined by the transverse and vertical directions, cuts through the longitudinal reinforcements and comprises transverse reinforcement contained in said plane, such that the transverse reinforcements surround the longitudinal reinforcements, wherein at the ends according to the longitudinal direction the beam comprises a rectangular recess for the fitting and support of the end of the beam on a column, the cross-section in the transverse direction comprising at each end of the beam a lower extension in the transverse direction, so that these extensions define in the beam longitudinal flanges for the support of prefabricated floor elements, the beam being provided at each end along the transverse direction of an L-section steel profile having a first flange arranged on the corresponding lower extension and a second flange attached to the transverse reinforcements of the beam.


In some embodiments, both ends comprise a rectangular recess for the fitting and support on a column.


In other embodiments, the other end comprises a rectangular protrusion designed for fitting on the rectangular recess of a beam in the next span, so that in the longitudinal rectangular recess there's thick concrete protrusions in the transverse direction placed at the bottom half of the section beam, and the end of the longitudinal rectangular protrusion has thick concrete protrusions in the transverse direction placed at the top half of the of the section of the beam designed to fit and lay on the concrete protrusions of the rectangular recess of a beam in the next span, the end of the beam provided with the rectangular recess comprising a rectangular hole, that may be connected with the rectangular recess, the hole being placed at the position of the junction with the column to allow for the bearing of the beam and for the passing of the vertical reinforcement of the column.


Therefore, the disclosure consists of merging two concepts: the advantages of a concrete beam, and those of the bearing supports between steel elements, so that the advantageous features of both are used to obtain a beam with continuous composite corbels running along its bottom edges. By continuous composite corbels we do not mean a continuous corbel conventionally reinforced with corrugated reinforcement bars, but rather the combination of the rolled profiles, in this case with an L cross-section, which allow the forces to be transmitted to the reinforcement of the main body of the beam, which is indeed formed by conventional corrugated reinforcement, so that the main body of the reinforced or prestressed concrete beam then transmits the loads to a column through the beam ends provided with recesses, which rest on a steel ring of the column, which also works as a composite section in the small corbels that the column has. As it is known, reinforced or prestressed concrete is a material that resists fire well and has a relatively low cost, but it has the drawback that it involves relatively large dimensions in the connections, due to the cover that reinforcements need. On the other hand, steel withstands high tensile and shear forces, but it is a material that has two drawbacks: its high cost, and its poor behavior against fire when it is exposed to heat. The beam object of the present disclosure allows taking advantage of each of the two materials wherever it is needed, which allows reducing costs and having a fire-resistant structure, without increasing the thickness of the structural floor.


Also, the disclosure relates to the use of a wide beam that is mainly supported on two sides of the column opposite along the transverse direction, rather than a narrow beam that is typically supported at the axis of the column.


Using a wide beam, supported on the column as described, brings five main advantages:

    • 1) As the beam will most of the times be wider than the column, in the column-beam junction, all the reinforcement of the beam may be concentrated at both sides of the column, leaving the central part of the beam (in the column-beam junction area) without reinforcement so that there is no collision between the vertical reinforcement of the column and the reinforcement of the beam. This arrangement will prevent that the reinforcement of the beam and/or the reinforcement of the column becomes restricted due to the geometric limitations caused by collisions of the two reinforcements. This is particularly important, as is allows the beam to have a larger amount of negative moment reinforcement, which means a larger degree of fixity of the beam at its ends, leading to less deflections of the beam, and to a more efficient use of the beam.
    • 2) The fact that the beam is wider than usual makes it significantly more performant than usual narrow beams. The large width allows the beam to become shallower, which leads to very performant but still flat (or almost flat) floors. A wide beam, with a large concrete section, as the one described in this application, will have a larger moment of inertia than an equivalent narrow beam with the same depth in a flat soffit structure erected with the state-of-the art beams. As a consequence, the wide beam will experience less deflections than the narrow beam. A wide beam, as the one described in this application, will also have more room to place reinforcement (prestressed or not), and will have a larger flexure strength, shear strength and torque strength than a narrow beam with the same depth.
    • 3) The fact that the bearing of the beam on the column is at opposite sides (of the column) according to the transverse direction, and eventually on corbels placed on these sides, makes this beam-column junction particularly resistant to torque forces. It also has the advantage that the span of the precast floor elements (parallel to the transverse direction) is shorter than if the beam was narrow. The floor elements being shorter enables that these floor elements are under smaller flexure moments, and smaller shear forces, so that economies can be done on these elements bay making them shallower and/or less reinforced.
    • 4) Finally, the fact that the beam is wide allows it to develop a very efficient kind of junction with the beam in the next span. This kind of junction, which behavior will be explained in more detail below, has the advantage that it allows the main shear forces acting on the beam to be transmitted in the transverse direction, while the main flexure forces of the beam are transferred in the longitudinal direction. This is because the shear forces are not transmitted through a half lap bearing in the vertical-longitudinal plan but through two half lap bearings in the vertical-transverse plan. Half laps are a typical solution to transfer shear in precast concrete beam, but they are typically not able to transmit flexure, as the bottom half part of the junction is typically not filled with concrete. In the current solution, the wide beam allows to transfer flexure and shear in different plans, so that they do not interfere with each other.
    • 5) As the beam is quite wide, and reinforcements are mainly concentrated at the sides of the beam, the central part of the beam may eventually include perforations for the passing of facilities, in case it is really necessary.


According to one embodiment, the second flange of the steel L-section is arranged on the vertical lateral surface of the beam and the two flanges of the steel L-section meet forming a corner. In this embodiment the exposed surface of steel of the L-section will be protected by the concrete cast in the job when making the junction system.


According to another embodiment, the first and the second flange of the L-shaped profile meet through a chamfer, rather than meeting directly forming a corner.


According to one embodiment, the second flange of the steel L-section extends to an upper surface of the prefabricated concrete beam.


This embodiment makes it possible to take advantage of the L-shaped rolled profile also as a former of the beam itself, which allows saving in formers and reducing manufacturing costs.


According to one embodiment, the beam comprises longitudinal reinforcements arranged in its upper section and in at least one central section of the beam that covers at least 75% of the total length of the beam.


As it is known, the creep of concrete may cause considerable long-term deflections, which will be larger the larger the span of the beam is. Since the beams support the considerable weight of the prefabricated floor elements, it is necessary to limit their deflection in order to be able to extend the span of beams. The longitudinal reinforcements arranged in the top part of the beam, as mentioned, make it possible at a low cost to effectively reduce long-term deflections due to creep on the beam.


According to one embodiment, the dimension of the beam in the transverse direction is at least twice the dimension in the vertical direction.


The wide shape of the beam allows for the horizontal accommodation of the different components to resist and transmit forces, such as the lateral support flanges and the longitudinal reinforcement, without thereby increasing the height of the slab.


According to one embodiment, the beam comprises an elastomeric strip on top of each of the flanges.


In this way, the support interface constituted by the bearing flanges is used as a preferential zone for the absorption of irregularities in the surfaces of contact, of the different deformations and also for the absorption of vibrations.


According to one embodiment, the beam comprises two lower bent metal plates at least at one of the longitudinal ends, the bent metal plate projecting inferiorly and laterally from the beam.


As will be seen later when describing the system, a space is envisaged between the ends of consecutive beams. This space must be filled with concrete cast in the job, so it will be necessary to have a lower formwork to contain this fresh concrete. With these bent sheets, a low-cost formwork solution is formed in conjunction with the prefabricated beam itself, which reduces construction costs and execution time.


According to one embodiment, the extensions (lateral flanges along the beam) have a depth between 3 and 10 cm.


The disclosure also refers to a construction system comprising a column, a prefabricated floor element and a beam according to any of the preceding claims, the column comprising a steel plate on which the end of the beam rests, the prefabricated floor element being supported on one of the longitudinal flanges of the beam, the steel plate on the column having preferably the shape of a rectangular ring.


The steel plate, preferably in the shape of a ring, is characterized by several details: On the one hand, it is a ring located completely outside the vertical reinforcement of the column joined therewith by welding.


The welded joint to the vertical reinforcement of the column prevents the—intense—loads that the metal ring has to support to be transmitted directly to the concrete placed below, avoiding the risk to damage it.


The steel ring is all finished off with an elastomer ring. The main function of the elastomer is to guarantee a uniform bearing, without stress concentrations potentially caused by irregularities in the concrete.


The steel ring, in one of its two directions, the transverse direction, may be wider, to withstand a significant proportion of the loads transmitted by the beam to the column and also to allow for the welding of a loop or hook to form the torsion-resistant system.


As the dimensions of the steel ring in the transverse direction are larger than the column, a small corbel may be formed on the sides of the column, as will be seen later. This corbel can be made very small, precisely based on the same principle that beam flanges can be made shallow: because they function as a composite section.


In the case of beams under very large loads, it may be necessary to build a larger steel ring, for example, by widening the ring in the longitudinal direction, thus forming corbels on the four faces of the column, which would be equivalent to a small composite capital.


According to one embodiment of the system, the steel plate has larger dimensions in plan than the column, and the column comprises transition corbels between the column and the plate, the corbels having a height ranging from 5 cm and 10 cm.


The combination of the composite corbels, the steel plate and the beam of the disclosure allows to minimize the space occupation under the soffit of the structural floor.


According to one embodiment of the system, the steel plate comprises hooks that emerge from it vertically and that are arranged opposite to each other in the transverse direction, so as to vertically retain the upper longitudinal reinforcements of the system and thus prevent the potential rotation or torsion of the beam during the assembly process, as a prefabricated floor elements may be supported only on one of the lateral flanges of the beam.


It is an element designed to provide security for a temporary situation during the assembly, which will remain in the installation. It makes possible to assemble all the prefabricated floor elements located on one side of the beam at once, without the need to place the prefabricated floor elements in a coordinated fashion on each side of the beam, seeking to balance the weight of the floor elements on the beam during the assembly process.


Besides enabling the beam to resist these torsional forces during the assembly process it may also enable beams to resist long-term unbalanced loads such as in the case of edge beams (spandrels)—which receive load only on one side- or in the case of beams that support floor elements with very different spans on one side and the other side of the beam.


According to one embodiment of the system, the rectangular recesses at the ends of the beams have a depth, in the longitudinal direction, being less than half of the dimension of the steel plate of the column in the longitudinal direction, so that it allows concrete to be poured in the job in the gap between the ends of successive beams, as well as is leaves space for the hooks arranged in the middle of the steel plate, which are part of the torsion-resistant system.


Thanks to this feature, a moment-resistant rigid junction can be formed between the two successive beams and the column, thanks to the system formed by the negative longitudinal reinforcements that connect one beam to the other, to the vertical reinforcement of the column and to the concrete cast in the job.


Note that the concrete cast-in-place on the formwork between the ends of the beams is particularly important to resist the negative bending moments of the beams, as it works in combination with the longitudinal reinforcements placed on top of the beams.


Finally, according to one embodiment of the system, the steel plate of the column is joined to the vertical reinforcement of the column, and preferably comprises elastomer bands on the support surfaces intended for the beams.


The following table summarizes the features of the current application, following the same scheme that for the prior art beams:









TABLE 1







Assessment of main features of the current


application regarding DEFLECTION CONTROL










Continuity of the beam















After cast in
Concrete of
Concrete
OVERALL


BEAMS
During
the job concrete
beam may be
of beam
LONG-TERM


TECHNOLOGY
erection
has hardened
prestressed
is precast
DEFLECTIONS





Application
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
LOW


(Variant FIG. 1)


Application
Yes



VERY LOW


(Variant FIG. 2)
















TABLE 2







Assessment of main features of the current application regarding STRUCTURAL


CAPACITY AND DETAILING (S*: Shear; F*: Flexure; T*: Torque)












NEGATIVE

REINFORCEMENT
STRENGTH OF



MOMENT
TORQUE
OF BEAM
JUNCTIONS












BEAMS
STRENGTH
STRENGTH
CROSSING
Beam-to-
Beam-to-


TECHNOLOGY
OF BEAM
OF BEAM
THE COLUM
column
beam





Application
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
S*: HIGH
S*: NONE


(Variant FIG. 1)



F*: HIGH
F*: HIGH






T*: HIGH
T*: HIGH


Application
VERY HIGH

VERY HIGH
S*: HIGH
S*: HIGH


(Variant FIG. 2)



F*: HIGH
F*: HIGH






T*: HIGH
T*: MID
















TABLE 3







Assessment of main features of the current application regarding


the COST OF BEAMS and the capacity to produce FLAT SOFFITS










Cost considerations
















Usually needs







fire-proofing





products or
Needs


BEAMS
FLAT SOFFIT
Consumption
oversizing
specific
OVERALL


TECHNOLOGY
(or almost)
of steel
the beam
formers
COST





Application
YES
Low
No
No
LOW


(Variant FIG. 1)
(Down-drop:


Application
3 to 10 cm)


(Variant FIG. 2)












BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

As a complement to the description and in order to help a better understanding of the features of the disclosure, according to some practical examples of the system, a set of figures is attached as an integral part of the description, as an illustration and not as a limitation, showing the following:



FIG. 1 shows a perspective view of the bearing system according to the disclosure, showing the beam, a prefabricated floor element and a column.



FIG. 2 shows a perspective view of the bearing system according to the disclosure, showing the beam, a prefabricated floor element and a column; in which a beam passing over the column has a rectangular recess to support a beam that has a complementary rectangular protrusion to fit in the rectangular recess.



FIG. 3 is a drawing including forces that explains the functioning of the retaining hooks of the upper longitudinal reinforcements.



FIG. 4 is a plan detail of the fit of two beams according to the disclosure at the level of the column.



FIGS. 5 and 6 are details of the bearing area of the prefabricated floor element on the longitudinal flange of the beam according to the disclosure, according to two embodiments that differ in the height of the vertical flange of the inserted L-shaped profile and in its position with respect to the vertical lateral face of the main body of the beam.



FIG. 7 is a plan view of the beam according to the disclosure.



FIG. 8 is a section of the beam, in an embodiment with a vertical flange of the profile that covers almost the entire height of the beam.



FIG. 9 shows a cross-section, according to a plane transverse to the beam, of the connection system according to the disclosure.



FIG. 10 shows a subset of columns and beams.



FIG. 11 is a perspective view of the junction in which the reinforcements of the column can be seen.



FIG. 12a is the stud and tie scheme of the composite corbel of the beam depicted in FIG. 5.



FIG. 12b is the stud and tie scheme of the composite corbel of the beam depicted in FIG. 6.



FIG. 13a is the detail of the welding of the second flange of the L-shaped profile with the transverse reinforcement of the beam. Also, an extra reinforcement is showed welded to the second flange of the L-shaped profile, that may be used in cases where the web is relatively high.



FIG. 13b shows a possible deformation mechanism of the composite corbel, based on the turning of the L-shaped profile. After this deformation mechanism, the reinforcements anchored in the concrete would prevent the L-shaped profile from turning and the corbel from deflecting.



FIG. 13c shows a possible deflection mechanism of the composite corbel, where the corbel functions as a small cantilever under deflection.



FIG. 14 shows a side elevation of the deflection of the wide beam, displaying the compressed top face, the tensioned bottom face and the position of the neutral fiber.



FIG. 15 shows a picture of the lateral buckling of the second flange of the L-shaped profile that occurred in a tested beam where the second flange of the L-shaped profile was not welded to the transverse reinforcement of the beam.



FIGS. 16a and 16b Shows the different zones of the wide beam. At the two ends, the composite corbels reinforced with the L-shaped profile. At the center a zone where reinforcement may be moderate or low, to avoid problems at the intersection with the reinforcement of the column and to allow for potential facilities holes. At the two sides of the main body of the wide beam, the two most reinforced parts of the beam.



FIG. 17a shows a longitudinal section and a partial transverse cross-section of the beam, representing a solution where the upper surface of the precast concrete is relatively low, because the beam is designed to allow placing negative moment resistant passive reinforcement of large diameter. This is a solution suitable to transfer intense negative moments from one beam to the one next to it in the longitudinal direction.



FIG. 17b shows a longitudinal section and a partial transverse cross-section of the beam, representing a solution where post-tensioning sheathings have been embedded in precast beams, and precast concrete has its upper surface higher than in FIG. 21a. This is a solution suitable to transfer intense negative moments from one beam to the one next to it in the longitudinal direction.



FIG. 17c shows a longitudinal section and a partial transverse cross-section of the beam, representing a solution where the passive negative reinforcement has been embedded in one of the two beams whereas the other has no negative moment reinforcement. In this case, the precast concrete upper surface is higher than in FIG. 17a. This solution is suitable for cases where the junction of the two beams is not intended to transfer negative moments.



FIG. 18a shows 3D representation of a half lap connection between two precast beams, conventional in the State of the Art.



FIG. 18b is a 2D representation of the junction of the beams showed in FIG. 18a after concrete has been poured in the job. Note how the bottom part of the junction is not filled with concrete.



FIG. 18c is the stud and tie scheme of the junction showed in FIG. 18a.



FIG. 19a is a plan of the beam junction of the current application showing the position of the three sections.



FIG. 19b is the longitudinal section A-A depicted on FIG. 19a, corresponding to a junction on the laterals of the main body of the beam; with a detail similar to that in FIG. 17c.



FIG. 19c is the longitudinal section B-B depicted on FIG. 19a, corresponding to a junction on the central part of the beam; with a detail similar to that in FIG. 17a.



FIG. 19d is the transverse section C-C depicted in FIG. 19a, corresponding to the bearing, through a double half-lap, of the rectangular protrusion of the left beam on FIG. 19a, on the rectangular recess of the right beam on FIG. 19a.



FIG. 20a shows the elevation of a frame formed by precast columns and precast beams during the erection process. This corresponds to the embodiment where beams have one end with a rectangular recess and at the other end a rectangular recess protrusion to fit in the complementary rectangular recess of another beam.



FIG. 20b shows the diagram of moments on the beams of the frame depicted in FIG. 20a. In this embodiment, the segments of beams passing over the column have negative moments, which shows that continuity is achieved also during the erection process.



FIG. 21a shows the elevation of a frame formed by precast columns and precast beams during the erection process. This corresponds to the embodiment where both ends of the beams have rectangular recesses to fit in the columns.



FIG. 21b shows the diagram of moments on the beams of the frame depicted in FIG. 21a.



FIGS. 22a to 22f show many embodiments of the disclosure, where are the next ends are combined:

    • i) end with a rectangular protrusion for the fitting and support of the beam on another beam;
    • ii) end with a rectangular recess complementary to a protrusion; this recess is placed in a beam with continuity on the next span; this end with recess always includes a through opening placed at the position of the junction with the column
    • iii) end with a rectangular recess for the fitting and support of the end of the beam on a column





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In the description of the possible preferred embodiments of the disclosure, it is necessary to give numerous details to promote a better understanding of the disclosure. Even so, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the disclosure can be implemented without these specific details. On the other hand, well-known features have not been described in detail to avoid unnecessarily complicating the description.



FIG. 1 shows a concrete beam 1 in which a longitudinal direction L and a transverse direction T are defined, as well as a vertical direction V which is perpendicular to the longitudinal direction L and the transverse direction T, so that the cross section Svt of beam 1, which is in the TV plane defined by the transverse T and vertical V directions, cuts longitudinal reinforcements AL and comprises transverse reinforcements ATV that surround the longitudinal reinforcements AL, and that are contained in the TV plane.


According to the disclosure, the beam comprises at one end along the longitudinal direction L a recess 11 with a rectangular floor plan for the fitting and supporting of the end of the beam 1 on a column 2, and the section at each end of the beam according to the transverse direction T a lower extension 12 along the transverse direction T, so that these extensions define longitudinal flanges 13 on the beam 1 for supporting prefabricated floor elements 3, the beam 1 being provided at each end along the transverse direction T with a steel profile 14 with L-section having a first flange 141 arranged on the corresponding lower extension 12 and a second flange 142 attached to the ATV transverse reinforcements.



FIG. 2 shows another embodiment of beam 1, where the other end of the beam along the longitudinal direction comprises a rectangular protrusion 41.


This protrusion 41 is designed for fitting on the rectangular recess 42 of a beam that has continuity in the next span. To this end, the longitudinal rectangular recess 42 has thick concrete protrusions 44 or a stepped vertical surface in the transverse direction T placed at the bottom half of the section of the beam, and complementarily the end with the longitudinal rectangular protrusion 41 has thick concrete protrusions 43 in the transverse direction T placed at the top half of the section of the beam designed to fit and lay on the concrete protrusions 44 of the rectangular recess 42 of the beam that has continuity on the next span. In the embodiment shown, the end of the beam provided with the rectangular recess 42 comprises a rectangular through opening 45 placed at the position of the junction with the column 2 to allow for the bearing of the beam 1 and for the passing of the vertical reinforcement 25 of the column 2.


However, in other embodiments, instead of a through opening, the recess 42 could extend to reach the column, such that the recess would serve both for bearing the beam on the column and for providing the recess for the connection with the next beam.


In this embodiment, during the erection of the structure, in order to prevent the beam from turning around its longitudinal axis due to torque forces caused by unbalanced loads on the lower extensions of the beam 12, steel plates 46 are placed in the job connected to the vertical reinforcement 25 of the column 2, for example, using nuts screwed on the vertical reinforcement 25. The system formed by the steel plates 46 the vertical reinforcement 25 of the column 2 and the beam 1, form a torque-resisting system.


In the embodiment shown in FIGS. 5 and 9, the second flange 142 is arranged on the vertical (lateral) surface of the beam. In this embodiment the second flange 142 and the first flange 141 meet forming a corner. Then the concrete 33 poured in the job will finish filling the space left between the floor element 3 and the beam, covering and protecting the steel profile.


The corner shape of the junction of flanges 141 and 142 is convenient in terms of production of the L-shaped, as the profile may be easily produced straightforward by bending a flat thin steel plate.


In another option, shown in FIG. 6, the second flange 142 does not meet directly the first flange 141 forming a corner, but through a chamfer 143. The production of this alternative embodiment of the L-shaped profile may also be obtained by folding a flat thin steel plate, but may need a more accurate control of the angles bent.


This embodiment allows for an increase in the precast concrete cross-section in the junction of the composite corbel and the main core of the beam. This enlarged cross-section increases the shear strength and the flexure strength of the composite corbel. This may be appropriate for beams supporting floor elements with large spans and/or intense loads.


In the embodiment shown in FIGS. 5, 8 and 9, the second flange 142 extends to an upper surface of the beam 1.


This embodiment makes it possible to take advantage of the L-shaped profile also in the formwork procedure of the beam itself, which allows saving in former elements and reducing manufacturing costs.


The beam comprises longitudinal reinforcement 1S arranged in its upper section and in at least one central section of the beam that covers at least 75% of the total length of the beam.


In all embodiments, the dimension of the beam along the transverse direction T is at least twice the dimension along the vertical direction V.


The flat shape of the beam allows for the horizontal accommodation of the different forces' transmission components such as the lateral support flanges and the longitudinal reinforcement, without thereby increasing the height of the slab.


As shown in FIG. 5 or 6, the beam comprises an elastomeric band 15 on each of the lower extensions 12 forming flanges 13.


The upper surface of the beam TS is flat as shown in FIGS. 17a, 17b, 17c. However, this upper surface may either be placed right under the level of the negative-moment resisting longitudinal reinforcement, as in FIG. 17a, or it may be placed right over the negative-moment resisting reinforcement covering it completely, as in FIGS. 17b and 17c.



FIGS. 17a, 17b and 17c, show at on the left a longitudinal cross-section of a junction of two beams 1, and show to the right a transverse cross-section across a beam 1 close to the junction of two beams.


The embodiment of FIG. 17a is advantageous because it allows to connect two beams 1 by placing passive reinforcement in the job, as negative-moment resisting longitudinal reinforcement. However, it has the disadvantage that the moment of inertia of the beam is lower during the erection process, so that deflections may be slightly larger. It also has the disadvantage that during the construction the junction is not negative-moment resistant, which also leads to more deflections. This is the kind of junction described in FIG. 1 for the connection of beams: only able to resist negative moments after the hardening of the concrete cast in the job (33).


The embodiment of FIG. 17c is advantageous because one of the beams (placed at the left in the longitudinal section) includes negative reinforcement. This has two advantages: on the one hand, the upper surface of the beam TS is on top of the negative reinforcement, which gives a larger moment of inertia to the beam during the erection process; and on the other hand, the beam negative-moment resistant during the erection process. Both features make the beam much less deformable during the erection process. This, ultimately, improves very much the performance of the beam, as a large part of the loads that the precast beam 1 will typically have to withstand are loads acting during the erection process. This embodiment corresponds to that shown in 3D in FIG. 2.


This embodiment allows the accommodation of central reinforcements without having to increase the height of the beam.


As shown for example in FIGS. 1 and 2, the beam 1 includes two lower bent metal plates 16 at least at one of the longitudinal ends, which protrude inferiorly and laterally from the beam 1. These plates can be supplied attached to the beam 1, or they can be installed at the time of erection.


The disclosure also relates, as shown in FIG. 1, to a construction system S comprising a column 2, a prefabricated floor element 3 and a beam 1 according to any of the preceding claims, the column 2 comprising a steel plate 21 on which the end of the beam 1 rests, the prefabricated floor element 3 resting on one of the longitudinal flanges 13 of the beam 1, the steel plate 21 preferably having the shape of a rectangular ring.


The plate 21 comprises some hooks 23 that emerge from it vertically and are arranged opposite to each other according to the transverse direction T, in such a way that they allow the upper longitudinal reinforcements 1S of the system S to be held vertically and prevent the rotation or twisting of the beam 1 during the assembly process, as a prefabricated floor element 3 may be placed on the side of the beam opposite to the position of a certain hook 23.


The rectangular recesses 11 have a depth along the longitudinal direction L less than half the dimension of the plate 21 along the longitudinal direction L, so that concrete can be poured between successive beams and/or a space is available for some hooks 23 arranged in the middle part of the plate 21.


The plate 21, as shown in FIG. 11, is attached to the vertical reinforcement of the column 2, and preferably comprises elastomer bands on the support surfaces intended for the beams 1.



FIGS. 12a and 12b display possible strut (=compression) and tie (=tension) schemes corresponding to the embodiments displayed in FIGS. 5 and 6, respectively, where are described two variants of geometry of the lower extension 12 and of the steel profile with L-section 14. The combination of 12 and 14, end by forming a composite corbel. For this corbel to function properly, it is essential that 12 and 14 are properly bonded. This is achieved thanks to welding the flanges of 14, this is 141 and 142, to transverse reinforcements ATV and to transverse reinforcements in the flange (=composite corbel) of the beam ATVF. It is also key for a proper functioning that the transverse reinforcements in the flange ATVF are not entirely horizontal but have at least a certain inclination. This inclination is required to compensate the vertical force P, which is the load transmitted by the prefabricated floor elements 3 to the beam 1. Without this inclination of reinforcement ATVF, the concrete of the lower extension would be under heavy shear and tension forces, and might experience brittle failure.



FIG. 13a shows two variants of the transverse reinforcements connecting the concrete of the precast beam (1) with the second flange 142 of the steel L-profile 14. The drawing at the left hand shows the welding of the conventional transverse reinforcement ATV to the second flange 142. The drawing at the right hand shows the welding of the transverse reinforcement ATV with a transverse reinforcement entirely embedded ATV2 in the concrete core of the beam 1. This reinforcement ATV2 is advantageous as it guarantees a proper connection of the second flange 142 with the concrete of the precast beam. This is important, because the transverse reinforcement ATV will often come out of the upper surface TS of the precast beam 1, which makes this transverse reinforcement ATV less efficient in terms of connecting the second flange 142 with the core of the beam 1.



FIG. 13b shows how in the event that load P, would tend to cause the turning of the steel profile 14 around a longitudinal axis, the transverse reinforcement ATV, and most particularly the transverse reinforcement embedded ATV2 in the core of the beam will prevent this turning by transferring a tension force TF to the core of the precast beam.


Depending on the actual slenderness of the lower extension 12, the behavior of the composite corbel will tend to be that of a very stiff element or that of a flexible element. For low slenderness lower extensions 12, the behavior will be stiff, and may be analyzed after schemes similar to that depicted in FIGS. 12a and 12b. If the slenderness is larger, the composite corbel will behave as a small beam in cantilever, as depicted in FIG. 13c; producing compressive stresses CS at the bottom of the lower extension 12 and tensions on the transverse reinforcements ATV and ATVF.



FIG. 14 shows how under positive moments deflection, the top part of the beam is under compression, and the bottom part under tension. NF stands for the neutral fiber. Note how in this situation, the second flange 142 will be under strong compressions.


These compressions will tend to cause lateral buckling in the second flange 142. This phenomenon may be observed in FIG. 15, which shows the result of a laboratory test where a beam 1 was tested that was not properly provided with welding connecting the second flange 142 with the core of the precast concrete beam 1.



FIGS. 16a and 16b show to typical reinforcement layouts in a beam 1.


In FIG. 16a the bottom longitudinal reinforcement 2S is evenly distributed on the width of the beam. In FIG. 16b the bottom longitudinal reinforcement 2S in concentrated an the two laterals of the beam 1, leaving at the center a part with a very low amount of reinforcement.


This second embodiment is particularly convenient when we want to cut passing openings through the beam, for example for the crossing of facilities. The central part of the beam may be cut in this way, thanks to the fact that the beam is supported on the sides of the columns, allowing that all load resisting reinforcements, including 2S, are concentrated at the sides of the beam.



FIGS. 17a, 17b and 17c show different embodiments of the relation of the top reinforcement 1S of the beam 1, and the upper surface of the beam TS.


In FIG. 17a the top reinforcement 1S, which is the negative-moment-resistant reinforcement of the beam, is placed on top of the upper surface of the beam TS. In this case the reinforcement 1S, will only function after hardening of the topping. This corresponds to the embodiment of FIG. 1


In FIG. 17c corresponds to the embodiment of FIG. 2, where the top reinforcement is embedded 1SE, and thus can resist moment also during the erection process.


In FIG. 17b is showed an embodiment where a sheathing SH for posttensioned reinforcement 1SPT is embedded in the precast beam 1, so that the posttensioned reinforcement 1SPT and a coupler C are placed in the job before pouring the concrete in the job 33.



FIGS. 18a, 18b, 18c show a conventional corbel of the prior art, where the formation of the corbel prevents the complete filling of the junction with concrete as the bottom is not filled, which leads to no capacity (or very low capacity) of the joint to resist negative moments.



FIG. 19a shows a plan view of the junction of two beams, where the right beam is supporting the left beam, that includes a protrusion 41. Sections AA′, BB′, CC′ on FIG. 19a are cross-sections displayed in FIGS. 19b, 19c, 19d, respectively.



FIG. 19b shows cross-section A-A′ responding to an embodiment like the one displayed in FIG. 17c.



FIG. 19c shows cross-section B-B′ responding to an embodiment like the one displayed in FIG. 17a.



FIG. 19d corresponds to cross-section C-C′. This shows an embodiment, consistent with prior figures, where the central part of the drawing corresponds to the protrusion 41 of the left beam which is supported by the right beam. Note that in this embodiment this central protrusion of the beam 41 has a slightly low upper surface of the beam TS. This allows to place a certain amount of upper longitudinal reinforcement 1S for the beam. This allows that the junction of beams may resist negative moments due to loads occurring after the hardening of the concrete cast in the job 33, causing those loads a potential a displacement of the 0-moment point of the diagram of moments.


Whereas, embedded upper reinforcement 1SE can resist both negative moments caused during the erection process and negative moments caused after the hardening of the concrete cast in the job 33. However, this embedded upper reinforcement 1SE may only resist negative moments as long as the negative moments are only on the beam placed at the right side of FIG. 19a. For moments that might eventually occur on the beam placed on the left side, the moments may be resisted by the combination of embedded reinforcement placed on the upper part 1SE of the left beam (if any), the reinforcement placed at the job on the upper part 1S of the central protrusion 41, the embedded reinforcement 1SE in the beam placed at the right side of FIG. 19a.



FIGS. 20a, 20b show the behavior of beams after the embodiment of FIG. 2 during the erection process, and FIGS. 21a, 21b show the behavior of beams after the embodiment of FIG. 1 during the erection process.


In FIG. 21b displays the diagram of moments of a frame with columns 2 and beams 1 after the embodiment of FIG. 1 during the erection process. In this embodiment, as the ends of beams are not able to resist negative moments, the whole diagram of moments is a for positive moments M+.


In FIG. 20b displays the diagram of forces of a frame similar in terms of spans and loads to the frame in FIGS. 21a and 21b. Note how in FIG. 20b, the positive moments M+ are very much diminished thanks to the fact that these beams 1 are able to resist negative moments M− during the erection process.



FIGS. 22a through 22e where several combinations of ends of beams are displayed: a) end with a longitudinal rectangular protrusion 41; b) end with a longitudinal rectangular recess 42 and a through opening 45; c) end with recess 11.



FIG. 22f displays a variant of the ends of beams where the longitudinal recess 42 is connected to the through opening 45.


In view of this description and figures, the person skilled in the art will be able to understand that the disclosure has been described according to some preferred embodiments thereof, but that multiple variations can be introduced in said preferred embodiments, without departing from the essence of the disclosure as such and how it has been claimed.


In this text, the term “comprise” and its derivations (such as “comprising” etc.) should not be understood in an exclusive sense. In other words, these terms should not be interpreted as excluding the possibility that what is described and defined may include more elements, stages, etc.

Claims
  • 1. A concrete beam in which a longitudinal direction and a transverse direction are defined, and a vertical direction is defined that is perpendicular to the longitudinal direction and the transverse direction, the beam comprising longitudinal reinforcements so that the cross section of the beam, which is in the plane defined by the transverse and vertical directions, cuts through the longitudinal reinforcements and comprises transverse reinforcements contained in said plane, such that the transverse reinforcements surround the longitudinal reinforcements, wherein at one end according to the longitudinal direction the beam comprises a rectangular recess for the fitting and support of the end of the beam on a column, the cross-section comprising at each end of the beam according to the transverse direction a lower extension according to the transverse direction, so that these extensions define in the beam longitudinal flanges for the support of prefabricated floor elements, the beam being provided at each end according to the transverse direction of a steel profile with an L-section having a first flange arranged on the lower extension and a second flange joined to the transverse reinforcements.
  • 2. The concrete beam according to claim 1, wherein both ends comprise a rectangular recess for the fitting and support on a column.
  • 3. The concrete beam according to claim 1, the other end comprises a rectangular protrusion designed for fitting on the rectangular recess of a beam that has continuity in the next span, so that in the longitudinal rectangular recess there's thick concrete protrusions in the transverse direction placed at the bottom half of the section of the beam, and the end with the longitudinal rectangular protrusion has thick concrete protrusions in the transverse direction placed at the top half of the section of the beam designed to fit and lay on the concrete protrusions of the rectangular recess of a beam that has continuity in the next span, the end of the beam provided with the rectangular recess comprising a rectangular through opening, that may be connected with the rectangular recess, the through opening being placed at the position of the junction with the column to allow for the bearing of the beam and for the passing of the vertical reinforcement of the column.
  • 4. The concrete beam according to claim 1, wherein the second flange is arranged on the vertical surface of the beam.
  • 5. The concrete beam according to claim 1, wherein the second flange extends to an upper surface of the beam.
  • 6. The concrete beam according to claim 1, further comprising longitudinal reinforcements arranged in an upper section of the beam and in at least one central section of the beam that covers at least 75% of the total length of the beam.
  • 7. The concrete beam according to claim 1, whose dimension along the transverse direction is at least twice the dimension along the vertical direction.
  • 8. The concrete beam according to claim 1, comprising an elastomeric band on each of the flanges.
  • 9. The concrete beam according to claim 1, comprising two lower bent metal plates at least at one of the longitudinal ends, which protrude inferiorly and laterally from the beam.
  • 10. The concrete beam according to claim 1, wherein the extensions have a depth between 3 and 10 cm.
  • 11. A construction system comprising a column, a prefabricated slab element and a beam according to claim 1, the column comprising a steel plate on which the end of the beam rests, the prefabricated floor element resting on one of the longitudinal flanges, preferably the steel plate having the shape of a rectangular ring.
  • 12. The construction system according to claim 11, wherein the plate has dimensions greater than the column in plan, and the column comprises transition corbels between the column and the plate, the corbels having a height ranging from 5 and 10 cm.
  • 13. The construction system according to claim 9, wherein the plate comprises hooks that emerge vertically from the plate and are arranged opposite to each other along the transverse direction, so that the hooks allow vertically retaining upper longitudinal reinforcements of the beams of the system and prevent the rotation or torsion of the beam during the assembly process, as a prefabricated floor element is placed on the beam at the opposite side to that on which the hook is arranged.
  • 14. A system according to claim 9, wherein the recesses with a rectangular floor plan have a depth along the longitudinal direction that is less than half the dimension of the plate along the longitudinal direction, so that concrete can be poured between the ends of successive beams and/or there is a space for hooks arranged in the middle part of the plate.
  • 15. The system according to claim 9, wherein the plate is joined to vertical reinforcements of the column, and preferably comprises elastomer bands on the support surfaces intended for the beams.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
U202130827 Apr 2021 ES national
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a 35 U.S.C. § 371 National Stage patent application of International patent application PCT/EP2022/060733, filed on 22 Apr. 2022, which claims the benefit of Spanish patent application U202130827, filed on 22 Apr. 2021, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/EP2022/060733 4/22/2022 WO