The present invention relates to concrete poles, and, in particular, to a concrete filled metal pole with excellent flexural characteristics.
In the prior art, many concrete filled steel columns may be found, such as U.S. Pat. No. 4,783,940 “Sato” which is for a concrete filled steel tube column, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,018,055 “Le Clercq” which is for a concrete filled steel caisson. In some instances, such as in “Sato”, the column is pre-stressed so that, when the column is subjected to axial loading, most if not all, of the loading is taken up by the concrete, which is excellent in compression, and very little of the load is transmitted to the steel casing. In these instances, the steel casing is used as a convenient way to hold the concrete during manufacture, and projections, if any, extending from the steel casing to the concrete are used either to reinforce the concrete (not the steel pole) or to be able to apply a pre-stress to the column such that, after loading, the concrete column preferentially takes up the load (instead of the steel casing).
A column is fixed at least at two locations, generally at the bottom (fixed to the ground by burying, bolting, etc.) and at the top where it is connected to other building structures such as ceilings, beams, etc. Resistance to axial loading is critical, but resistance to flexural loading is unimportant because there is little, if any, flex loading given that the column is fixed at least at two locations. The concrete is used because it is excellent in compression (axial loading), and the outside shell is used mostly (if not exclusively) to support the concrete. Radially extending projections (such as in Sato) are used to enhance the binding between the concrete and the shell so one can apply the post-tensioning loads.
A pole, on the other hand, is fixed at only one location (typically bolted or buried to the ground at one end), and at the other end, a weight (like from a light fixture or wires hanging from the pole) results in a cantilevered load which imposes horizontal loads (flexural loads) which must be addressed.
One possible solution is to increase the thickness of the steel pole, adding significant cost. But one soon reaches a thickness where the pole can no longer be formed. Furthermore, along streets and roadways, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires a minimum of 24 inches between any sidewalk and the curb. Any pole installed along these streets must typically fit into this limited space (typically 24″), and this thus becomes the maximum dimension of the pole at the base, further limiting the thickness of the steel pole.
The present invention provides a concrete filled, formed steel pole with axially aligned reinforcing rods extending substantially along the length of the steel pole. The reinforcing rods are preferably continuously welded to the steel pole, and the rods are preferably located along the longitudinal “bends” of the formed steel pole. The steel pole is formed in two or more sections to permit access for continuous welding of the rods to the inside surface of the steel pole, and then these sections are themselves secured to each other (by welding or bolting, for instance) to form the steel pole. Concrete is poured into the steel pole and, as it sets and cures, it binds with the inside surface of the steel pole as well as with the reinforcing rods. The rods serve to transfer the load from the outer steel casing to the inner concrete core, plus they provide additional binding surface area between the concrete and the steel, and substantially strengthen the steel pole so that it may flex or bend without buckling or collapsing. The reinforcing rods are preferably made from a material which offers high compatibility with the weld rod used to secure the rods to the steel pole.
Referring to
Referring now to
As shown in
The resulting concrete-filled steel pole 10 has a relatively thin steel casing 12, and the reinforcing rods 18 lend additional strength to the steel pole 10, especially for handling flexural loads, as well as aiding in transferring the load from the steel casing 12 to the concrete 20, and providing additional surface for binding the concrete 20 to the steel casing 12.
This particular embodiment has reinforcing rods along six of the eight vertices of the shell 12. It would be possible to weld reinforcing rods to the other two vertices prior to assembling the shell halves together in order to have reinforcing rods at all the vertices. It would also be possible to weld reinforcing rods along alternating vertices or in other arrangements as required by the loading to be put on the pole.
It will be obvious to those skilled in the art that modifications may be made to the embodiment described above without departing from the scope of the present invention.
This application claims priority from provisional application Ser. No. 60/403,523, filed Aug. 14, 2002.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
408379 | Cunningham | Aug 1889 | A |
909299 | Hilborn | Jan 1909 | A |
973670 | Kinnear | Oct 1910 | A |
1087334 | Stevens | Feb 1914 | A |
1858512 | Langenberg et al. | May 1932 | A |
3354657 | Turzillo | Nov 1967 | A |
3958381 | Meyer | May 1976 | A |
3987593 | Svensson | Oct 1976 | A |
4018055 | Le Clercq | Apr 1977 | A |
4127002 | DeWitt | Nov 1978 | A |
4616464 | Schleich et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4738058 | Svensson | Apr 1988 | A |
4783940 | Sato et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
6123485 | Mirmiran et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6295782 | Fyfe | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6705058 | Foust et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0033008 | Aug 1981 | EP |
1 260 146 | May 1961 | FR |
745 329 | Feb 1956 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050097855 A1 | May 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60403523 | Aug 2002 | US |