The present invention relates to concrete foundations used to support tall, heavy and/or large towers and the like, and to methods for the construction thereof.
Concrete foundation structures of various kinds have been developed to support commercial signs, traffic signs, light poles and the like. To support larger structures including tall and heavy towers and wind turbines that exert significant overturning force on the foundation. Applicant developed and commercialized a tensionless pier foundation which is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,586,417 (“the '417 patent”). The '417 patent is hereby expressly incorporated by reference as if fully set forth in its entirety herein.
The tensionless pier foundation described in the '417 patent includes a concrete foundation formed as a cylinder having an outer boundary shell defined by a corrugated metal pipe (CMP) and an inner boundary formed by a second CMP of smaller diameter. Elongated high strength steel bolts run from an anchor flange near the bottom of the concrete cylinder vertically up through the concrete to extend above the upper end of the foundation and through a connecting flange for the supported structure to be connected on top of the foundation. The bolts are encased in sleeves or hollow tubes over a substantial portion of their vertical extent in the concrete to allow the encased portion of the bolts to be stretched and thus tensioned. With such tensioning of the bolts, the concrete is kept under constant compression while the bolts are always in static tension. Thus, the pier foundation in the '417 patent is referred to as “tensionless” due to the absence of tensile stress on the concrete.
The '417 patent construction was a significant improvement over previously known concrete foundations that incorporated a reinforcing steel bar matrix and were subject to repeatedly alternating tensile and compressive loads on the concrete, leading to fatigue and, in many cases, premature failure. Additional improvements in tensionless concrete foundations are shown in Applicant's other U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,720,139 (“the '139 patent”) and 9,340,947 (“the '947 patent”), among others. The complete disclosures of the '139 and '947 patents are hereby expressly incorporated by reference as if fully set forth in their entirety herein.
In addition to tension and compression loads, concrete foundations are also subject to shear stress. Therefore, it would be beneficial to have a tensionless pier foundation that is more resistant to shear stress and that can be constructed in various configurations to reduce the overall cost of the foundation, particularly when constructing in rock or stable soils.
In view of the foregoing, the present invention is directed to a pier foundation having a plurality of elongated tower anchor bolts embedded within sleeves in a concrete pier and secured at their lower ends to an anchor or embedment ring to form a tower anchor bolt cage. The upper ends of the anchor bolts extend above the top of the concrete so that the bolts, which bear the tensile load, can be post-tensioned to keep the concrete pier under compression in like manner to the construction described in the '417 patent. To increase the lateral shear stress resistance of the foundation, at least a lower portion, and preferably at least the bottom third, of the concrete pier is surrounded by a spiral hoop encasement formed by hoop steel around the perimeter of the tower anchor bolt cage.
The present invention is also directed to a pier foundation in which the spiral hoop encasement encircles nearly the entire vertical extent of the pier foundation. When constructed in rock or stable soils that, when drilled or excavated, leave side walls that stand vertically, the full vertical extent spiral hoop encasement eliminates the need for an outer CMP and, depending upon the formation of the center of the pier, can also eliminate the need for an inner CMP as well.
Addition, the present invention is directed to various methods of constructing a pier foundation having a spiral hoop encasement at reduced cost, particularly in rock or stable soils.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a concrete pier foundation that is highly resistant to both upset and lateral shear stress.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a concrete pier foundation in accordance with the preceding object that is maintained under compression in excess of expected tension forces when resisting upset of a supported tower while at least, the bottom portion of the foundation is surrounded by a spiral hoop encasement for increased lateral shear resistance.
A further object of the present invention is to provide a concrete pier foundation in accordance with the preceding objects in which the spiral hoop encasement is formed by hoop steel around the perimeter of the tower anchor bolt cage.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a concrete pier foundation in accordance with the preceding objects in which the spiral hoop encasement extends nearly the full vertical extent of the foundation from the anchor ring at the base to or near the top of the concrete.
Still another object of the present invention is to provide a concrete pier foundation in accordance with the preceding object in which the foundation is constructed without an outer CMP.
A further object of the present invention is to provide a concrete pier foundation in accordance with the preceding two objects in which the foundation is constructed in rock or stable soil without either an outer CMP or an inner CMP.
A still further object of the present invention is to provide a concrete pier foundation in accordance with the preceding object in which the foundation is formed within a dug-out annular trench with native soil remaining undisturbed inside the area surrounded by the trench.
Yet a further object of the present invention is to provide a concrete pier foundation in accordance with the object before the preceding object in which the foundation is formed by excavating a cylindrical hole and filling the entire hole, including the center area encircled by the bolt cage, with concrete.
Another object of the present invention is to provide one or more methods of installing a concrete pier foundation having a tower anchor bolt cage at least partially wrapped with a spiral hoop encasement for lateral shear reinforcement in which the foundation is constructed without an outer CMP, or without either an outer CMP or an inner CMP.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a method of constructing a concrete pier foundation without any CMPs in accordance with the preceding object that includes digging an annular trench with native soil remaining undisturbed inside the area surrounded by the trench and filling the trench with concrete after the tower anchor bolt cage wrapped with the spiral hoop encasement is positioned therein.
Still another object of the present invention is to provide a method of constructing a concrete pier foundation without any CMPs in accordance with the object before the preceding object that includes digging a cylindrical hole and filling the hole with concrete after the tower anchor bolt cage wrapped with the spiral hoop encasement is positioned therein.
A further object of the present invention is to provide a method of constructing a laterally reinforced concrete pier foundation that includes excavating a hole, assembling a tower anchor bolt cage including a plurality of sleeved anchor bolts in an annular arrangement and secured at their lower ends to an anchor ring, wrapping an outer perimeter of the tower anchor bolt cage with a spiral loop steel addition over at least a lower end thereof to provide lateral shear reinforcement to the pier foundation, and securing the wrapped tower anchor bolt cage with concrete after the cage is positioned within the hole with the anchor ring at the bottom of the pier.
These together with other objects and advantages which will become subsequently apparent reside in the details of construction and operation as more fully hereinafter described and claimed, reference being had to the accompanying drawings forming a part hereof, wherein like numerals refer to like parts throughout.
It is to be understood that the embodiments described herein are disclosed by way of illustration only. It is not intended that the invention be limited in its scope to the details of construction and arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. Also, in describing the preferred embodiments, specific terminology will be resorted to for the sake of clarity. It is to be understood that each specific term includes all technical equivalents which operate in a similar manner to accomplish a similar purpose.
A concrete pier foundation like that disclosed in the '417 patent is shown in
According to a first embodiment shown in
According to the present invention, while installing the tower anchor bolt cage 18 inside the outer CMP 12, a shear steel addition 40 is wrapped around the perimeter of the tower anchor bolt cage 18, preferably about the lower one third of the pier foundation, to provide the pier foundation 100 with improved lateral shear resistance. According to a preferred embodiment, the assembled cage 18 is wrapped while being lowered, such as by a crane or the like, into the excavation 16. The inner CMP 14 is then placed within the excavation, inwardly of the outer CMP and bolt cage, and a concrete plug 11 is poured in the interior area 15 at the bottom of the inner CMP to solidify its position. Cementitious material is then poured into the annular area 24 formed between the outer and inner CMPs and backfilling of the interior area 15 and annular area 17 with soil is completed.
The shear steel addition 40 may be made of hoop steel arranged in a plurality of loops vertically spaced between about three inches and about six inches apart, and preferably about four inches apart. When spaced about four inches apart, there are three loops per foot in the vertical dimension. This creates an angle from horizontal having a slope of about four inches over 14 feet.
The hoop steel is preferably one continuous strand although separate individual loops could be used with the understanding that installation would in most cases be more time consuming. The hoop steel strand is preferably either 0.5 inches or 0.6 inches in diameter and is high strength steel having a tensile strength on the order of 270,000 psi.
In vertical distance, the shear steel addition 40 as shown in
The second embodiment of the present invention shown in
The foundation 200 is constructed by drilling or excavating the hole 16, placing an inner CMP 14 and partly backfilling the center area 15 as necessary to stabilize the CMP 14. Alternatively, a concrete plug 11 may be poured to secure the inner CMP at the bottom. The tower bolt cage 18 is assembled outside the hole 16 and then wrapped with a spiral hoop encasement 140 while being lowered into the annular area 124 between the sidewalls 19 and the inner CMP 14. Concrete is then poured into the annular area 124 and any remaining backfilling of the center area of the inner CMP 14 completed. Alternatively, the tower bolt cage may be lowered into the excavation 16 before the inner CMP 14 is placed and the plug poured, as with the first embodiment. In either case, i.e., regardless of the installation order of the inner CMP and the tower bolt cage, the second embodiment eliminates the need for the outer CMP 12, reducing the cost of construction and also obviating the associated need to backfill with soil against the sidewall 19.
A third embodiment of the pier foundation with lateral shear reinforcing loops of the present invention is shown in
The foundation 300 is constructed by excavating the trench 310, assembling the tower bolt cage 18 and wrapping the same with a spiral hoop encasement 140 while lowering the tower bolt cage 18 into the annular area 124 between the sidewall 19 and the inner sidewall 190. Concrete is then poured into the trench 310. By eliminating the need for both CMPs as well as the plug, and by saving the man and equipment hours otherwise needed for backfilling, the trench configuration shown in
A fourth embodiment of the pier foundation with lateral shear reinforcing loops according to the present; invention is shown in
The spiral hoop encasement 140 of each of
The foregoing descriptions and drawings should be considered as illustrative only of the principles of the invention. The invention may be configured in a variety of shapes and sizes and is not limited by the dimensions of the preferred embodiment. Numerous applications of the present invention will readily occur to those skilled in the art. Therefore, it is not desired to limit the invention to the specific examples disclosed or the exact construction and operation shown and described. Father, all suitable modifications and equivalents may be resorted to, falling within the scope of the invention.
This application claims priority from U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 62/703,217, filed Jul. 25, 2018.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
732485 | Wight | Jun 1903 | A |
969039 | Cowles | Aug 1910 | A |
1139384 | Taf | May 1915 | A |
1189459 | Lundin | Jul 1916 | A |
1529895 | Chance et al. | Mar 1925 | A |
1647925 | May | Nov 1927 | A |
2377055 | Thornley | May 1945 | A |
2625815 | Black | Jan 1953 | A |
2971295 | Reynolds | Feb 1961 | A |
3646748 | Lang | Mar 1972 | A |
RE27732 | Van Buren | Aug 1973 | E |
3798868 | Loranger | Mar 1974 | A |
3927497 | Yoshinaga et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
4043133 | Yegge | Aug 1977 | A |
4051661 | Leprohon, Jr. et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4068445 | Bobbitt | Jan 1978 | A |
4092811 | Lin et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4197695 | Hughes et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4247225 | Chickini, Jr. et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4866903 | Ferstay | Sep 1989 | A |
4887691 | Rotondo | Dec 1989 | A |
5218805 | Rex | Jun 1993 | A |
5505033 | Matsuo et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5586417 | Henderson | Dec 1996 | A |
5623792 | Crumpacker | Apr 1997 | A |
5826387 | Henderson et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5966882 | Naito | Oct 1999 | A |
6102118 | Moore | Aug 2000 | A |
6659691 | Berry | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665990 | Cody et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6672023 | Henderson | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6705058 | Foust | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6782667 | Henderson | Aug 2004 | B2 |
7155875 | Henderson | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7533505 | Henderson | May 2009 | B2 |
7618217 | Henderson | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7707797 | Henderson | May 2010 | B2 |
7905069 | Lockwood | Mar 2011 | B1 |
8720139 | Henderson | May 2014 | B2 |
9096986 | Henderson | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9340947 | Henderson | May 2016 | B2 |
9481973 | Henderson | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9783950 | Henderson | Oct 2017 | B2 |
10640995 | Phuly | May 2020 | B2 |
20020050110 | Ytterberg | May 2002 | A1 |
20020095878 | Henderson | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020124502 | Henderson | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20040261340 | Behlinger et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005562 | Henderson et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20110173897 | Schneider | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120047830 | Phuly | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120070233 | Wang et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120151860 | Li | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120266447 | Diaz-Vallellanes | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120314540 | Alter | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130129474 | Schacknies et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130255169 | Henderson | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140260023 | Henderson | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140260223 | Long et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150376859 | Phuly | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20180264680 | Phuly | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20200032476 | Henderson | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200032478 | Rajewski | Jan 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2551712 | Jun 2012 | CA |
2754577 | Jun 1979 | DE |
10105472 | Aug 2002 | DE |
202012006606 | Nov 2012 | DE |
0160135 | Nov 1985 | EP |
1526278 | Apr 2005 | EP |
2833029 | Jun 2003 | FR |
60-92518 | May 1985 | JP |
61-109826 | May 1986 | JP |
64-71987 | Mar 1989 | JP |
4-353117 | Dec 1992 | JP |
5-311678 | Nov 1993 | JP |
H5-311678 | Nov 1993 | JP |
8-338034 | Dec 1996 | JP |
9-256390 | Sep 1997 | JP |
11-181797 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2001-200582 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2002-061201 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2003-013442 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003-232046 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2005-220554 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2010-65454 | Mar 2010 | JP |
20010057453 | Jul 2001 | KR |
WO 8403531 | Sep 1984 | WO |
WO 0227105 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 02099204 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 2011029994 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO 2012037450 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO 2012062425 | May 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Declaration of Dr. John T. Bryant in Support of Petition for Inter Partes U.S. Pat. No. 7,618,217 (filed Sep. 9, 2021). |
Declaration of Dr. John T. Bryant in Support of Petition for Inter Partes U.S. Pat. No. 7,533,505 (filed Sep. 9, 2021). |
Declaration of Dr. John T. Bryant in Support of Petition for Inter Partes U.S. Pat. No. 7,707,797 (filed Sep. 9, 2021). |
Newman, Morton. Structural Details for Concrete Construction. McGraw Hill Book Company, 1998. |
Peck et al. Foundation Engineering, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, 1953. |
Federal Highway Administration Transportation. Geotechnical Engineering Circular N. 4, Ground Anchors and Anchored Systems, Jun. 1999. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,533,505 filed Sep. 10, 2021. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,618,217 filed Sep. 10, 2021. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,707,797 filed Sep. 10, 2021. |
Post-Tensioning Manueal, Fifth Edition, Post-Tensioning Institute, 1990. |
Prestressed Concrete, PCA America's Cement Manufacturers, 1916. |
Kelley. A. Short History of Unbounded Post-Tensioning Specifications, Concrete Repair Bullentine, Jul./Aug. 2001. |
Design Examples; Attachment 8. |
Nigels, McLeod C. Prestressed Conrete Tension Piles and Their Connections, PCI Journal, Jul.-Aug. 1988. |
Reflections on the Beginnings of Prestressed Concrete in America, The Prestressed Concrete Institute, 1981. |
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. Post-Tensioning Tendon Installation and Grouting Manuarl, Version 2.0, May 2013. |
Aschenbroich, Horst. Dipl. Ing. A Post Tensioned Micropile Foundation System with Groutable Void Forms (GVF). |
Aschenbroich, Horst, Dipl. Ing. Micro Pile Reinforcement Systems and Corrosion Protection, 2001. |
Deformation of Reinforced Concrete Anchor Foundations in the Far Norht, Plenum Publishing Corporation, 1991. |
Crabtree et al. The Strengthening of Transmission Tower Foundations Using Grouted Anchor Bars. |
Kim, Nak-Kyung. Performance of Tension and Compression Anchors in Weathered Soil. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Dec. 2003. |
Dams—Innovations for Sustainable Water Resources, 22nd Annual USSD Conference San Diego, California, Jun. 24-28, 2002. |
Prestressed Concrete Bridges. |
Wind Turbine Anchoring Solutions, Peikko Group, Concrete Connections. |
Standard Specification for Steel Strand, Uncoated Seven-Wire for Prestressed Concrete, ASTM International. |
Allam et al. Crack width evaluation for flexural RC members. Alexandria Engineering Journal, (2012) 51, 211-220. |
Svensson, Henrick. Design of Foundations for Wind Turbines, 2010. |
Eurooppalainetekninen hyväksyntä. ETA-10/02; European Technical Approval. VTT Expert Services Oy. Issued Apr. 21, 2011. |
Bruce et al. Foundation Rehabilitation of the Pocomoke River Bridge, Maryland, Using High Capacity Preloaded Pinpiles, The Conference on Bridges official proceedings. Jun. 4-6, 1984. |
Peikko's Foundation Solution Chosen for Wing for Wing Park to be Built in Hamina, Finland. https://web.archive.org/web/20111228043258/http://www.peikko.com/news/n=Peikko%27s+Foundation+Solution+choses+for+Wind+Park+to+be+builtin+in+Hamina%2c+Finland. |
Hevosselka Wind Park, Tervola, Finland, https://www.peikko.com/reference/hevosselka-wind-park. |
Loflin, Bryan J. Bond and Material Properties of Grade 270 and Grade 300 Prestressing Strands. Jun. 10, 2008. |
Peikko to supply the wind turbine tower foundation solution to Finnish Muukko wing park. https://web.archive/org/web/20121001214327/http://www.peikko.com/news/n=Peikko+to+supply+the+wing+turbine+tower+foundation+solution+to+Finnish+Muukko+wing+park. |
Muukko Wind Park, Lappeenranta, Finland, https://www.peikko.com/reference/miiukko-wind-park/. |
Mäkelänkangas Wind Park, Hamina, Finland. https://www.peikko.com/reference/makelankangas-wind-park/. |
https://web.archive.org/web/20121003065612/http://www.peikko.com:80/news/year=2012. |
Peikko and Enercon to Expand Their Cooperation. Press Release Apr. 5, 2011. https://web.archive/org/web/20110814012119/http://www.peikko.com/news/n=Peikko+and+Enecon+to+expand+their+cooperation. |
Peikko to supply the wind turbine tower foundation solution to Finnish Muukko wind park. https://www.peikko.cz/novinky/peikko-to-supply-the-wind-turbine-tower-foundation-solution-to-finnish-muukko-wind-park-w/. |
Peikko Group: Product Catalogue. Jul. 2, 2012. |
Aschenbroich, Horst Dipl.lng. Reinforcement of dams in Canada and the USA. Www.contechsvstems.com. |
https://web.arcive.org/web/20121003064830/http://www.peikko.com/news/year=2012/month=05. |
Wind Turbines Uljabuouda, Sweden, Project Story in PeikkoNews Feb. 2009. https://web.archive.org/web/20120320121335/http:www.peikko.com/reference-main/references/rg=Power+Plants+and+Lines/r=Wind+Turbines+Ulkabuouda+%2C+Sweden. |
A unique turnkey solution for wind turbine tower foundations. https://web.archive.org/ . . . b/20120403071116/http://www.peikko.com/solutions-category/solutions/s=A+unique+turnkey+solution+for+wind+turbine+tower+foundations/SID=24072976. |
Clemence, Samuel P., Uplift Behavior of Anchor Foundations in Soil. Proceedings of a session sponsored by the Geotechnical Engineering Division of the American Society of Civil Engineers in conjunction with the ASCE Convention in Detroit, Michigan. Oct. 24, 1985. |
Benefits for wind energy specialist. https://web.archive/org/web/20121030175316/http://www.peikko.com/group/t=Wind+Energy+Specialist. |
Affidavit of Josef Alter in U.S. Appl. No. 11/428,778, executed on Jun. 2, 2009. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200032476 A1 | Jan 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62703217 | Jul 2018 | US |