This invention relates to a placer/spreader for receiving mixed concrete or base materials and distributing these materials in windrows on subgrade in the path of a slipform paver. More particularly, a placer/spreader spanning a road subgrade is provided with a roll in/roll out conveyor for receiving concrete or base material from an access road alongside the road subgrade and thereafter distributing the concrete onto the road subgrade for slipforming by a following paver. The placer/spreader includes a power unit offset from the roll in/roll out conveyor, and a beam reinforced with the conveyor track for strengthening the placer/spreader frame and supporting crawler tracks. With the roll in/roll out conveyor telescoped within and underneath the frame, the placer/spreader frame folds into a compact simplified transport configuration for shipping on a single trailer between job sites with reduced set-up time and overhead.
Slipform pavers are commonly utilized for paving reinforced and non-reinforced concrete roadways and airfield pavements. It is common practice for the concrete delivery trucks to back up on the subgrade and dump the contents of the truck on the subgrade in the path of a slipform paver and thereafter slipform the placed concrete into the final profile of the specified concrete slab section. However, in some cases it is not possible for the trucks to drive on the subgrade of the roadway in the path of the slipform paver and a separate access road must be employed alongside the road.
The placer/spreader here disclosed has utility where an access road is required. Access roads are required along the road subgrade when the subgrade in front of the slipform paver is not suitable for driving and dumping (such as when the subgrade is extremely porous, for example where superior drainage under the placed pavement is desired) or is too soft, thus not being supportive enough for the delivery trucks. It also has utility to receive and distribute concrete over the top of pre-placed dowel basket assemblies or continuous reinforcing bar reinforcement secured to the subgrade that would otherwise block the path of the concrete delivery trucks.
Placer/spreaders of the prior art typically utilize a side delivery conveyor for receiving from concrete delivery trucks traveling along the access road (alongside the road subgrade) and then distributing freshly mixed concrete in front of the slipform paver on the subgrade to be paved. These side receiving conveyors are of two types: hinged conveyors and so-called “roll in/roll out” conveyors.
Hinged conveyors extend to the side of the placer/spreader at the access road for receiving already mixed concrete from a delivery truck and transporting and distributing that concrete onto the subgrade in the path of the slipform paver. Such hinged conveyors are relatively inexpensive and well understood in their operation. Such hinged conveyors do have disadvantages and advantages over roll in/roll out conveyors.
First, hinged conveyors typically hinge down onto and up out of an access roadway at the side of the road surface to be paved each time a delivery truck must pass. There is frequently insufficient room on the access road for trucks to drive around the hinged conveyor when it is in the down position. The access road is only wide enough for one truck to pass. Before a hinging up movement can occur, the conveyors have to be emptied of concrete. Only when the conveyors are emptied of concrete can hinging occur. Thus a precisely timed sequence of truck dumping and conveyor loading, belt emptying, and finally belt hinging up (to allow the next truck to pass) and coordinated delivery truck movement must occur. This precise coordinated movement is not always possible at construction sites, especially where soft road conditions make movement of both the placer/spreader and delivery trucks unpredictable.
Where precise delivery truck and/or placer/spreader movement does not occur, collisions between the receiving end of the conveyor and delivery truck frequently occur. This often results in structural damage to the conveyor, intermittent concrete delivery, and ultimately less than optimum slipform paver movement. Conveyor damage can be catastrophic, bringing the entire road building process to a halt. Further, these collisions, intermittent delivery, and intermittent paver movement can cause uneven pavement surfaces with resultant contract penalties for placement of other than level (smooth) pavement surfaces. Since modern road construction contracts provide premium or bonus payment for smooth roadways and deduction from full payment for uneven pavement surfaces, smooth/level pavement surfaces can significantly impact the road contractor financial results on the project.
Furthermore, the time lost in running the conveyor empty prior to hinging up the conveyor reduces the productive ability of the placer/spreader by reducing the number of loads per hour that the placer/spreader can handle. This reduced productivity may require the use of a second placer/spreader in order to absorb the full output of a high production concrete plant.
Many times access road elevations can vary widely when the access road surface is soft. This can cause problems when the receiving end of the conveyor is too high for the truck to dump into. This leads to delay in the dumping of the truck and adversely affects production.
It is known in the prior art that one advantage of hinged conveying is that the angle of the receiving end of the conveyor can be varied hydraulically on the fly to match the slope or uneven elevation of the access road. The disadvantage of the prior art roll in/roll out conveyor is that it had no ability to adjust the angle of the receiving belt to match the slope or uneven elevation of the access road on the fly. The inability of the conveyor to adjust easily for varying access road slopes and elevations also contributes to lost production.
Roll in/roll out conveyors of the prior art have a concrete receiving end and a slightly elevated concrete discharge end. The concrete receiving end typically telescopes out and is supported in a cantilever fashion overlying the access road. This requires the access road to be well-graded, compacted and level. Already mixed concrete is unloaded onto the cantilevered concrete receiving end of the conveyor. The roll in/roll out conveyor then undertakes two discrete movements.
A first movement is the conventional operation of the conveyor transporting the received concrete from the receiving end of the conveyor to the discharge end of the conveyor. Dependent upon the location of the discharge end of the conveyor, concrete is distributed onto the subgrade to be paved.
A second movement is the so-called telescoping movement of the conveyor. Typically, while the conveyor is running in conventional conveying movement (with concrete still on the belt), the entire conveyor telescopes relative to a supporting U-frame so that its discharge end traverses the subgrade to be paved (e.g. “roll-in”). In such traversing of the subgrade, concrete is still being unloaded off the belt and distributed as the discharge end traverses the subgrades to be paved. As much as a third of a truckload of concrete can still be present on the running belt when the belt is being rolled in.
Additionally, and as a consequence of the second movement, the discharge end of the conveyor distributes the remaining concrete on the belt across the subgrade during its traversing movement. Prior to the transverse movement of the conveyor, concrete can accumulate in the traversing path of the telescoping conveyor overlying the subgrade. The conveyor discharge end when equipped with a strike-off plate can collide with and strike off the upper portion of the accumulated concrete pile, further distributing concrete on the subgrade to be placed. This allows the entire truckload of concrete to be discharged without delay.
In contrast to this, a hinge-up conveyor configuration must receive the entire truckload of concrete before the placer/spreader can move ahead. With large truckloads of concrete, many times the concrete pile under the discharge end of the conveyor gets so high that it prevents remaining concrete on the conveyor from being discharged. The concrete backs up on the conveyor. The only way to resolve this situation is to move the placer/spreader and dumping truck ahead to make room under the discharge end of the conveyor so the conveyor can empty. Only when the conveyor is empty can the conveyor receiving end hinge up to allow the next delivery truck to pass.
Because of these distribution characteristics, roll in/roll out conveyors have superior concrete distribution characteristics over hinged conveyors and are more productive. Furthermore because of the inherent weakness of a hinge conveyor to side loads (namely a truck colliding with it) the roll in/roll out conveyor configuration is superior and more robust in construction. Because the hinged conveyor must be able to hinge more than 90 degrees, it is almost impossible to build a hinge with sufficient strength and structural integrity to prevent damage when a truck hits it. The more robust construction possible with a receiving end of a roll in/roll out conveyor makes it capable of colliding with and even pushing delivery trucks, which hinged conveyors cannot. This is important from a standpoint of minimizing potential down time and increasing the productivity of roll in/roll out and hinged conveyors.
Prior art roll in/roll out conveyors are typically supported on a separate support frame (conveyor module). This modular support frame includes paired bolsters aligned parallel to and arranged on either side of the subgrade to be paved. Paired crossbeams span the subgrade between the bolsters and tie the two bolsters together. The conveyor and its overlying support frame (as a module) are inserted between bolster-supported jacking columns with supporting crawler tracks in front of and a traditional paver-like tractor with a power plant behind the conveyor module. The diesel/hydraulic power unit is centered and on top of the tractor frame and provides power for the entire placer/spreader, including the roll in/roll out conveyor. The tractor unit also includes a removable set of rear jacking columns and supporting crawler tracks.
Unfortunately, roll in/roll out conveyors as presently used and implemented on such support frames and tractor frames with power units have several disadvantages.
First, such roll in/roll out conveyors and their supporting structures require heavy-duty construction. When loaded with already mixed concrete their weight increases considerably. Typically, when the conveyor is rolled, it can be holding up to four yards of concrete weighing approximately 3000 pounds each. Thus the supported roll in/roll out conveyors are a heavy dynamic load, placing high load demands on their supporting frames.
These heavy roll in/roll out conveyors are typically provided with two support points. A first support point is adjacent the access road. This support point adjacent the access road enables the extended conveyor to cantilever out into the access road for receiving ready-mix concrete. The second support point is on a rail spanning the width of the subgrade over the roll in/roll out conveyor. When the conveyor telescopes in, severe loading is placed on the support frame through the second support points on the spanning rail. From the spanning rail, the loading is distributed to the placer/spreader frame.
Second, such placer/spreader frames are utilized to support a hydraulic power plant for powering the entire placer/spreader including the roll in/roll out conveyor. Adding the weight of the roll in/roll out conveyor to the same frame supporting the power plant has thus far necessitated the use of two frames. Specifically, the tractor frame is utilized to support a ground-level concrete spreader (such as an auger spreader) and the hydraulic power unit. A second dedicated conveyor supporting frame is utilized for the support of the loaded telescoping roll in/roll out conveyor.
In the mid-1960s, CMI Corporation (originally Construction Machinery Inc.) of Oklahoma City, Okla., manufactured a placer/spreader known as the PST 400 having the above construction with a roll in/roll out conveyor belt. Since then, another manufacturer copied this machine in its entirety. The machine included a main tractor frame with two side bolsters supporting an underlying concrete spreader auger with strike-off and an attached overlying power unit. The main tractor frame had an attaching rear bolster. Attached to the front of the main tractor frame was a conveyor supporting frame (conveyor module) which had an underlying roll in/roll out conveyor and an attaching front bolster. The entire assembly was supported on four jacking columns with crawler tracks.
This machine had superior function and productivity but was bulky, requiring multiple loads to be transported between job sites.
Specifically, three discrete loads must be transported. Further, both assembly and disassembly of the unit require a crane assist. Regarding the loads, a first load includes the main tractor frame with the power unit and an underlying spreader auger assembly. A second load includes the conveyor supporting frame with an underlying roll in/roll out conveyor. A third and final load includes the disassembled front and rear bolsters, each with jacking column and supporting crawler track. Disassembly and assembly of the placer/spreader was and is very time-consuming and takes days to set up and tear down.
Moreover, the two discrete frames, namely the conveyor support frame and the tractor frame, require re-sectionalization when a width change of the placer spreader is required, say to change the width from a standard 24-foot wide pavement to a 30-foot wide pavement.
It should be understood that spreader augers utilized by the prior art are less than optimum. Typically, and because of the limits of the auger flighting and the mass of the auger, a central support bearing is required to support the auger from the main tractor frame. The supported auger includes opposed auger flights terminating at a central bearing. Further, such augers have a diameter in the range of three feet in order to be large enough to spread concrete rapidly. Finally, and assuming that more concrete is placed on one side of the auger support bearing than on the other side of the auger support bearing, redistributing concrete across the central support bearing of the spreader auger is problematic at best. Spreader augers are very costly to operate because the auger flighting and the bearings wear out rapidly when conveying abrasive concrete.
During the inventors' research and work that led to the development of the following described placer/spreader, considerable resistance was encountered from our prospective customers to the use of roll in/roll out conveyor belts. This resistance was a direct result of the extraordinarily difficult and time-consuming set-up, transport and width change costs of prior art machines utilizing roll in/roll out conveyors. Interestingly enough, even though customers do not like the prior art placer/spreader, they often refer to the advantages of roll in/roll out conveyors. Specifically, we realized after our research that a placer/spreader utilizing a roll in/roll out conveyor (that had some limited ability to adjust the angle of the receiving end of the belt to compensate for sloped or uneven access roads) and that could be transported in a single load would have great utility and value to users.
The reader will realize that the above close analysis of failings of the prior art has been our work product, resulting from considerable research. It will be further understood that we have never seen the comments set forth above serially in the prior art together with the problems generated by such prior art. It is well known that the recognition of problems to be solved can constitute invention. Accordingly, we claim invention in recognizing the problems to be solved as well as setting forth the particular solutions to those problems.
A placer/spreader for distributing already mixed concrete from an access road to a subgrade path to be paved includes a frame having at least two side bolsters standing parallel to the subgrade path and at least two cross beams spanning the subgrade path for forming a conveyor supporting structure. A roll in/roll out conveyor has a receiving end for receiving already mixed concrete from an access road and a discharge end for discharging already mixed concrete onto the subgrade path. The conveyor is hinged to conform it to differing access road elevations. One of the two side bolsters defines forward and rear transport attachment points with a spatial interval between the transport attachment points. This spatial interval permits the roll in/roll out conveyor to be supported between forward and rear attachment points. The other of the two side bolsters defines an attachment point for at least one transport. At least three transports are attached at the two side bolsters with the at least two transports attached to the forward and rear transport attachment points and the at least one transport attached to the other of the two side bolsters.
A support mounted within the spatial interval between the transport attachment points provides for the cantilevered telescoping support of the roll in/roll out conveyor during telescoping movement adjacent the access road. A support rail for the traversing support of the discharge end of the roll in/roll out conveyor is included below the frame to reinforce the frame against bending as well as to provide a support for the traversing conveyor. A support attached at the discharge end of the roll in/roll out conveyor moves along the support rail for the traversing support of the discharge end of the roll in/roll out conveyor. There are further means for moving the roll in/roll out conveyor in telescoping movement relative to the frame whereby the receiving end of the roll in/roll out conveyor is telescoped from and extends from the cantilevered support into the access road to receive already mixed concrete. Thus, the discharge end of the roll in/roll out conveyor discharges and/or distributes already mixed concrete across the subgrade path during the telescoping movement.
Referring to
In operational order, the belt places the concrete, the augers spread the concrete, and finally paver P forms the concrete into the road profile. Thus the progress of the placer/spreader 10 is from the left to the right of
Concrete is typically mixed at a batch plant (not shown) and transported in dump trucks D1 and D2. In the view here shown, truck D1 is shown after having delivered a load of concrete; truck D2 is shown ready to position itself after the roll in/roll out conveyer has telescoped inward.
Referring to
Referring to
Concrete is received on belt B when the belt is telescoped out from under frame F. The concrete, once received on belt B, is conveyed by the belt to the discharge end of the belt within frame F. As belt B telescopes into the frame, the discharge end of the belt moves across the paving path from the side adjacent access road 20 to the side away from the access road 20. This moves the discharge end of the belt B and causes further distribution of the concrete. Considerable power is required for this movement. Accordingly, hydraulic cylinders with accumulators are preferably used.
Even this placement of the concrete is not perfect. Accordingly, a spreader plow 32 riding on frame F is placed between a strike-off bar 30 and frame F. Side-to-side movements of spreader plow 30 distribute concrete evenly into the advancing path of paver P. Strike-off bar 30 also trims concrete to the desired profile at placed concrete 15 for slipforming by paver P. Spreader plow 32 and strike-off bar 30 assure essentially an even distribution of concrete 15 by trailing belt B. Spreader plow 32 is powered by a hydraulically operated reel and cable unit; powering by a double-acting hydraulic cylinder can be employed instead. Spreader plow 32 typically operates from a rail 31 which permits side-to-side movement.
Power for the unit is required, the preferred unit here shown being a hydraulic actuator. Accordingly, machinery module M is placed eccentrically on frame F away from access road 20 toward single crawler 11 with its paired jacking columns 12. This placement is cooperative with the underlying railway for supporting the telescoping belt B, especially when the width of the placer/spreader 10 is expanded.
Referring to
First, telescoping belt B can be seen in side elevation in two dispositions. A first disposition has loading end 42 over the access road with discharge end 44 located approximately medially of frame F. Belt B is also shown telescoped into frame F with discharge end 44 remote from access road 20. Belt B telescopes horizontally between the two positions, discharging concrete during the telescoping movement.
Second, belt B has a belt strike-off plate 46. As belt B moves in telescoping movement relative to frame F, the strike-off plate itself serves to spread concrete when concrete accumulates to the level of the strike-off plate.
Third, belt B is supported adjacent access road 20 by a cantilever support 48. Further, belt B is supported within frame F by rails 49. Rails 49 allow belt support 41 to traverse the underside of frame F. Rails 49 stiffen the section of frame F as it supports machinery module M.
Fourth, belt B includes a medial hinge 40. Hinge 40 flexes belt B through an angle not exceeding 15 degrees. This point of hinging allows belt B to accommodate access roads 20 of varying elevation relative to the path of placer/spreader 10.
Referring to
Strike-off bar 30 is supported from frame F by attachment probes 60. Additionally, spreader plow 32 traverses frame F on a cable and rail system 62. It should be noted that any system that enables spreader plow 32 to traverse frame F can be used; for example, instead of cable and rail system 62, a hydraulic system can be used.
It is important to provide the operator with a platform having a vantage point over the operation. Accordingly, a fold-down platform 64 provides for operator support over telescoping belt B, spreader plow 32 and strike-off beam 30.
The two crawlers adjacent access road 20 supported on pivotal arms 51 have rotation relative to the pivotal arms 51. This not only permits steering of placer/spreader 10, but in addition is critical in assuring a compact disposition of the placer/spreader when it is shipped between job sites.
Referring to
Once frame F is supported on a flatbed truck, jacking columns 12 can be raised from ground support to support from the bed of the truck.
Further, spreader plow 32 is pivoted upward. At the same time, strike-off bar 30 is drawn into close juxtaposition relative to frame F. The entire placer/spreader 10 can be hauled on a single trailer.
Referring to
In the preferred embodiment, crawlers were illustrated. Other devices will work as well. For example, rails and flanged wheels can be used instead. Any transport scheme capable of preserving the level placement of concrete will suffice.
The above specification is exemplary of the main aspects of this invention. Much conventional detail has not been described. For example, the apparatus illustrates leveling gauges for leveling the roughly placed concrete relative to a guide wire system. This system is common to pavers used throughout the paving industry and is therefore not further explained here.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3299786 | Godbersen | Jan 1967 | A |
3450011 | Godbersen | Jun 1969 | A |
3541931 | Godbersen | Nov 1970 | A |
3779661 | Godbersen | Dec 1973 | A |
3959977 | Godbersen | Jun 1976 | A |
4073592 | Godberson et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4136993 | Fletcher | Jan 1979 | A |
4343513 | Godbersen | Aug 1982 | A |
4717282 | Anderson | Jan 1988 | A |
4789266 | Clarke et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4930935 | Quenzi et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5470175 | Jensen et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
6422785 | Ruggles et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060204334 A1 | Sep 2006 | US |