The invention relates to a concrete railroad tie, especially to a two-block railroad tie, with an elastic rail support for ballast and solid tracks, with guide plates with twisting-prevention devices disposed in the supporting region between the base of the rail and the lateral, raised shoulders of the railroad tie.
For all conventional, concrete railroad ties, whether monoblock railroad ties or two-block railroad ties for ballast and solid tracks, continuous, relatively deep depressions are produced in the concrete next to the raised shoulders of the railroad tie for accommodating a correspondingly protruding rib of the guide rails, which are constructed as angle guiding plates.
It is one of the disadvantages of this construction that, when producing the concrete railroad ties in the casting molds, inserts with high ribs must be introduced in order to form the depressions. These inserts can only be produced from very high plates, which must be milled out correspondingly deep. This means that the loss of the very expensive material of these inserts is very appreciable and that the processing costs are very high, because the depressions have different radii of curvature on the inside and outside.
It is therefore an object of the invention to configure a concrete railroad tie of the type named above, so that simpler guiding plates, occupying less space, can be used and that mold inserts, which are provided with high lugs and particularly complicated to manufacture, are avoided.
Pursuant to the invention, this objective is accomplished owing to the fact that support region is constructed essentially flat without continuous deep depressions. Advantageously, the essentially flat support region is provided with lugs to prevent twisting.
Due to the omission of the depressions, which previously were basically provided, inserts, which are intended for the casting molds for producing the concrete railroad ties and are expensive to manufacture, are omitted. Furthermore, there is the possibility of using simpler guide plates without the high ribs, which prevent twisting.
The invention, moreover, is based on the realization that, in view of the contact between the guide plates and the raised shoulders, these ribs, which prevent twisting, can develop the additional, twisting preventing effect only to a limited extent. Moreover, it is possible to achieve this effect in a similar manner with considerable less expense by protruding lugs, which prevent twisting.
Aside from the possibility of providing the support region with centrally disposed elevations, which limit the guide plates on the inside, provisions can also be made, in a development of the invention, that the support region, in the area of each guide plate, preferably has two lateral lugs to prevent twisting, which engage corresponding recesses in the guide plate.
In this connection, these lugs, which prevent twisting, may be cemented to the railroad tie or formed by dowels, especially by plastic dowels, which are pressed into prefabricated recesses into the concrete.
Finally, is also within the scope of the invention to provide, instead of lugs that prevent twisting, small depressions, which prevent twisting, in the region of the lateral edges of the support area and which are engaged by appropriate lugs of the of the plate that prevents twisting.
Further advantages, distinguishing features and details of the invention arise out of the following description of some examples as well as from the accompanying drawings.
The preinstalled position of the rail fastening parts is shown in
For most embodiments, the raised shoulders 1 adequately prevent twisting of the set-down guide plates. In order to prevent it even better, especially in the pre-installed state, in much the same way as in the case of conventional plates with ribs, which engage deep depressions in the concrete railroad tie, two lateral lugs 16, which prevent twisting, may be disposed on the flat support region 3″ in the area of each guide plate. The lateral lugs 16 are configured either as shown in
Finally,
In
The example of
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102 33 784 | Jul 2002 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3904112 | Thim et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
4078724 | McCormick et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4907740 | Oberweiler et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
6364214 | Sonneville et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6488215 | Mohr | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6659363 | Mohr | Dec 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
38 20 243 | Jun 1988 | DE |
297 07 425 | Apr 1997 | DE |
100 30 998 | Jun 2000 | DE |
198 48 928 | Oct 2000 | DE |
0 767 274 | Apr 1997 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040232254 A1 | Nov 2004 | US |