This application claims priority to German Patent Application No. DE 10 2017 212 268.4, filed on Jul. 18, 2017, and German Patent Application No. DE 10 2018 211 300.9, filed on Jul. 9, 2018, the contents of both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
The invention relates to a condensate separator. The invention furthermore relates to a heat exchanger with such a condensate separator.
From DE 10 2005 050 133 A1 there is known an arrangement, especially a turbocharger arrangement of a motor vehicle, with an internal combustion engine and exhaust gas recirculation, wherein the arrangement has an exhaust gas cooler and a charge air cooler for cooling of recirculated exhaust gas and/or charge air as well as a compressor for compressing the charge air and at least one condensate separator.
From U.S. Pat. No. 6,748,741 B2 there is known a charge air condensation separating system for an engine with turbocharger, especially for engines with exhaust gas recirculation, wherein the charge air condensation separating system has a turbocharger with a compressor, which cools the charge air with a charge cooler. A charge air supply duct is connected to an outlet of the charge air cooler, wherein a toroidal trap with an annular inlet is arranged in the charge air supply duct with a sump for collecting of condensate, integrated in the toroidal trap. A drain line for taking away condensate from the sump and ejecting the condensate into the atmosphere is connected to the toroidal trap and a pump, or another device for overcoming the pressure difference in the drain line, is used in certain embodiments.
From U.S. Pat. No. 3,817,221 A there is known a device for draining of condensation liquid from the exhaust gases of an internal combustion engine, prior to the recirculation of a portion of these exhaust gases to the internal combustion engine. At a suitable position of the exhaust gas line there is arranged at least one device with which the liquid formed during the condensation of the moisture from the exhaust gases is taken up and directed through pipelines to the intake of the internal combustion engine. This liquid is recirculated in a combustion chamber and aspirated by the partial vacuum of air into the combustion chamber.
From U.S. Pat. No. 4,696,279 A there is known a system for a combustion control system for an internal combustion engine with exhaust gas recirculation line, wherein a decanter centrifuge is arranged in the exhaust gas recirculation line, which separates condensate and small particles from the exhaust gas stream.
From WO 2016/020162 A1 there is known a cooler for cooling a gas flow with a cooler block, having one gas pathway carrying the gas flow and one coolant pathway carrying a flow of coolant. The two pathways are separated in terms of media, yet thermally coupled together, and a liquid separator is situated downstream of the cooler block, relative to the direction of the gas flow, in a cooler housing. A condensate drain by which the condensate separated at the liquid separator can drain from the cooler housing is situated at a distance from the cooler block, as with the liquid separator.
In internal combustion engines, exhaust gas condensates are generated, being unavoidable during operation. Exhaust gas condensates in components situated in the intake stream after the heat exchanger may lead to corrosion and misfiring in the internal combustion engine. This can be avoided by reducing the condensate carried along by the exhaust gas and entering the intake line.
The drawback of the prior art according to WO 2016/020162 A1 is in particular that the separation principles have a relatively low efficiency. If the separation of the condensate occurs in the exhaust gas recirculation path by means of a grid, there will also occur a fouling and sooting of the grid, having negative influence on the pressure loss in the exhaust gas recirculation system.
The drawback to U.S. Pat. No. 4,696,279 A is that this is only effective for the condensate separation in small exhaust gas quantities and is disadvantageous in terms of costs and design space required, since the decanter centrifuge acting as the separator is an add-on part, not integrated in the heat exchanger.
One problem which the present invention proposes to solve is to indicate new ways for condensate separators to separate condensate from a gas stream.
This problem is solved according to the invention by the subject matter of the independent claims. Advantageous embodiments are the subject matter of the dependent claims.
The present invention is based on the general idea of achieving a design space-optimized and at the same time improved condensate separation in that a condensate-laden gas stream at first undergoes a swirling acceleration and then is guided onto an impact element, for which purpose there are arranged at the inlet end on the housing of a condensate separator a swirl generator and downstream from the swirl generator an impact element. The gas is always guided in linear manner in one direction. Thanks to the integration of the condensate separator in an exhaust gas return line, directly on the heat exchanger, it is possible to separate the condensate with no additional components, which is advantageous in terms of costs. The housing of the condensate separator has herein a connection flange at the point of entry of the exhaust gas stream into the condensate separator for the attachment of the condensate separator to a heat exchanger. Moreover, it is advantageous that no additional axis is used for a diverting of the exhaust gas stream from the linear direction, so that the condensate separator can have a space-optimized design. By doing without a diverting of the exhaust gas stream, moreover, only slight pressure losses are generated in the exhaust gas stream.
In one preferred embodiment, a housing of the condensate separator has at the inlet end a funnel element directed into the housing, wherein the swirl generator is situated downstream from the funnel element. In this case, the funnel element acts as a kind of nozzle and accelerates the gas stream. By increasing the flow velocity at the funnel element, the following condensate separation is also improved.
The separated condensate may be drained by at least one condensate drain in the bottom of the housing of the condensate separator. The outlet pipe is located at the opposite side of the connection flange of the heat exchanger and may protrude into the housing of the condensate separator. The length of the outlet pipe and the distance from this pipe to the impact element may act as set points for the condensate separation rate and the pressure loss in the exhaust gas stream. By mounting a cone-shaped diverting element on the swirl generator, an improvement and optimization of the separation rate can be achieved in regard to the diverting of the condensate from the main flow in the direction of the walls of the housing of the condensate separator.
In another preferred embodiment, the swirl generator is configured as an insert element. The swirl generator may be combined with the impact element, which is situated downstream from the swirl generator, so that the diverting and the separating of the condensate from the gas stream occurs in a component with a short structure. In addition, the arrangement may have a swirl sleeve. The swirl sleeve should prevent condensate already separated from being entrained again by the incoming exhaust gas stream, so that the separation rate can be boosted. The swirl sleeve may be fastened by a flange between the connection flange of the heat exchanger and the housing of the condensate separator, preferably by clamping. Moreover, the funnel element may be eliminated, for which the swirl generator with the combined impact element has a larger diameter.
Bypass openings may be provided between the swirl generator and the connection flange of the heat exchanger, which are preferably configured as slots. The bypass openings serve for transporting away the condensate separated by the swirl generator. The bypass openings may lead to an improved flow of the condensate through the condensate separator and thus to an improved efficiency of the condensate separator. It is also possible to use only one large swirl generator with no integrated impact element, in which case the impact element can be entirely eliminated. Moreover, the impact element may be arranged downstream from the swirl generator.
The integration of a cone-shaped diverting element directly in the swirl generator may lead to an improvement in the diverting of the condensate from the exhaust gas stream in the direction of the walls of the housing of the condensate separator and thus to an optimization of the separation rate of the condensate separator. The integration of both components in a single component is advantageous in terms of space needed in the design space and the manufacturing costs.
In another preferred embodiment, the swirl generator is configured as a web-shaped holder arranged on the connection flange of the heat exchanger, holding a cone-shaped diverting element at its cone tip. The web-shaped holder holds the cone-shaped diverting element in the middle of the exhaust gas stream, the cone tip of the diverting element being directed against the flow direction of the exhaust gas stream. The simple geometry of the cone-shaped diverting element enables a favourable production as compared to other more complex geometries.
In one advantageous modification of the solution according to the invention, a flow control contour is arranged upstream from the condensate drain in the flow direction of the gas stream, such as a spoiler, a ramp or a wing, which diverts the gas stream across the condensate drain. Of course, the flow control element may also take other forms, for example, being configured as an annular bulge partly enclosing the condensate drain. Thanks to such a flow control contour, the separated quantity of condensate may be boosted fourfold.
Other important features and advantages of the invention will emerge from the dependent claims, from the drawings, and from the description of the corresponding figures with the aid of the drawings.
Of course, the above-mentioned features and the following ones yet to be discussed may be used not only in the respective indicated combination, but also in other combinations or standing alone, without leaving the scope of the present invention.
Preferred exemplary embodiments of the invention are represented in the drawings and shall be explained more closely in the following description, where the same reference numbers pertain to the same or similar or functionally identical components.
There are shown, each time schematically
At the opposite end of the condensate separator 1, looking from the connection flange 4, there is situated the outlet pipe 8 (see
According to
Since the cone-shaped diverting element 12 has a simple geometry, the production costs for the cone-shaped diverting element 12 can be kept low. At the opposite end of the condensate separator 1, looking from the connection flange 4 of the heat exchanger 17, there is located the outlet pipe 8 for the exhaust gas stream, which also in this embodiment protrudes into the housing 2 in the direction of the connection flange 4, the length of the outlet pipe 8 by which the outlet pipe 8 protrudes into the housing 2 serving as a setpoint for the condensate separation rate of the condensate separator 1 and for the pressure loss in the exhaust gas stream (see
In the embodiments shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102017212268.4 | Jul 2017 | DE | national |
102018211300.9 | Jul 2018 | DE | national |