Condition-based powertrain control system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10036338
  • Patent Number
    10,036,338
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, April 26, 2016
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 31, 2018
    6 years ago
Abstract
A system and approach for development of setpoints for a controller of a powertrain system. The controller may be parametrized as a function of setpoints to provide performance variables that are considered acceptable by a user or operator for current operating conditions of the engine or powertrain. The controller may determine set point trajectories in real time during operation of the powertrain system and determine positions of manipulated variables do drive controlled variables to associated and determined set point trajectories. The present system and approach may determine set point trajectories for powertrain conditions on-line and in real time, whereas set point trajectories have previously been determined off-line for powertrain control.
Description
BACKGROUND

The present disclosure pertains to powertrain systems, and particularly to a control of engines and cooling systems. More particularly, the disclosure pertains to performance improvement of engines and cooling systems.


SUMMARY

The disclosure reveals a system and approach for development of set points and set point trajectories for a controller of a powertrain system. A controller of the powertrain system may be configured to determine set points and/or set point trajectories for one or more conditions of the powertrain system. The controller may determine set points and/or set point trajectories for the one or more conditions of the powertrain system based, at least in part, on current operating conditions of the powertrain system and performance cost function. The controller may determine positions of actuators of the powertrain system to drive the conditions of the powertrain system to the determined set points and/or set point trajectories. The present system and approach may configure and update set points and set point trajectories for conditions of a powertrain system in real time and while the powertrain system is operating.


The approach described in this disclosure may be important for controlling transient performance of powertrain systems and/or be important for other purposes. This may be so because a standard approach for controlling performance of powertrain systems may consist of computing static offline set points as a function of disturbance variables, and for transient performance optimization, such an approach may require maps having large dimensions that may exceed memory available in the engine control unit and/or processing power thereof that may be present in an online environment. However, the disclosed system and approach may determine set points and/or set point trajectories online and in real time with less memory and processing power requirements than conventional approaches.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING


FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of an illustrative powertrain system;



FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram of a controller of the illustration powertrain system;



FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of an implementation of an illustrative powertrain condition management system;



FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of an implementation of an illustrative powertrain condition management system; and



FIG. 5 is a schematic flow diagram of an illustrative approach for managing a condition of a powertrain system.





DESCRIPTION

The present system and approach, as described herein and/or shown in the Figures, may incorporate one or more processors, computers, controllers, user interfaces, wireless and/or wire connections, and/or the like, wherever desired.


Transportation original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) may spend a large amount of time and money on a labor intensive process of designing setpoints for their powertrain controllers. A powertrain may incorporate an engine, a cooling system, and, in some instances, an exhaust gas aftertreatment mechanism. The powertrain may also incorporate a drivetrain and, in some setups, a vehicle associated with the drivetrain. Any reference to an engine, cooling system, powertrain or aftertreatment system herein, may be regarded as a reference to any other or all of these components.


One version of the present approach may leverage a powertrain controller to assist in the development of set points and/or set point trajectories for conditions of the powertrain system. The powertrain controller may be parametrized as a function of the set point trajectories to set actuator positions in real time (e.g., while the powertrain system is operating). Another version of the present approach may be a practical way for providing a user with information about how best to modify setpoints for a powertrain controller on-line and in real time.


A characteristic of powertrain condition management systems (e.g., a powertrain thermal management system or other powertrain system) may be that operating conditions (e.g., speed, load, and so forth) may change continuously or off and on while the powertrain is operating to meet the needs of an operator of the powertrain. In an example of powertrain thermal management systems, optimal temperatures (e.g., temperature set point trajectories of components of a powertrain system) for minimum fuel consumption and/or actuator power consumption may depend on current operating conditions of the powertrain system. One approach may control temperature set point trajectories of components of the powertrain system such that the temperatures may be driven to optimal values (e.g., set point trajectories) for a given economic cost function of operating the powertrain (e.g., to minimize fuel costs, energy consumption, and so on). In some cases, the economic cost function may take into consideration performance variables such as fuel consumption, energy consumption, parasitic losses, exhaust output, and so forth, when changes in operating conditions of the powertrain are measured or future changes to the operating condition may be available. Although the powertrain thermal management systems disclosed herein may be discussed primarily with respect to setting temperature set point trajectories, the disclosed concepts may be utilized with pressure set point trajectories (e.g., air-conditioning refrigerant), flow set point trajectories (e.g., coolant flow), and/or other condition set point trajectories of powertrain systems.


In some cases, set point trajectories for conditions of the powertrain may be maintained within one or more constraints. In one example, an economic cost function applied to the control of a powertrain system may be part of a model-predictive control (MPC) framework such that a control action may be generated while maintaining one or more conditions (e.g., a temperature condition, actuator positions, and so forth) within one or more constraints.


Although control strategies for set point trajectory regulation with set point trajectories from steady state optimization (e.g., off-line optimization) may be used; such control strategies may not provide optimal performance of the powertrain system because the set point trajectories may be set without taking into consideration current operating conditions of the powertrain system. In some cases, thermal management of a powertrain system may be investigated from a system modeling and/or optimization perspective, where the optimization of the powertrain system performance occurs on-line (e.g., in real time during operation of an engine or other component of the powertrain system).


Herein, one may discuss approaches and/or systems for optimization (e.g., on-line optimization) of powertrain thermal management in a model-based control framework. As discussed further below, the disclosed concepts may be implemented in one or more of two or more approaches which each address on-line optimization and control of powertrain thermal management.


Turning to the figures, FIG. 1 depicts a powertrain system 10. The powertrain system 10 may include a cooling system 12, an engine 14, sensors 16, a controller 18, and/or one or more other components.


The cooling system 12 may be connected to the engine 14. Illustratively, the cooling system 12 may be configured to manage temperature values of powertrain components, including the engine 14.


One or more sensors 16 of the powertrain system 10 may be configured to sense one or more variables of the cooling system 12 and/or the engine 14. In some cases, the sensors 16 may be in communication with the controller 18 and configured to send sensed variable values to the controller 18.


The sensors 16 may be any type of sensor configured to sense a variable of the powertrain system. For example, the sensors 16 may include, but are not limited to, a temperature sensor, an absolute pressure sensor, a gage pressure sensor, a differential pressure sensor, a flow sensor, a position sensor, and/or one or more other types of sensors.


The controller 18 may be an electronic control module (ECM) or electronic control unit (ECU) with a control system algorithm therein. In one example, the control system algorithm may configure the controller 18 to be a multi-variable controller.


As seen in FIG. 2, the controller 18 may include one or more controller components having memory 24, a processor 26, an input/output (I/O) port 28, and/or one or more other components. The processor 26 may be in communication with the memory 24 and may be configured to execute executable instructions stored on the memory 24 and/or store and use data saved on the memory 24. In one example, the memory 24 may include one or more control system algorithms and/or other algorithms and the processor 26 may execute instructions (e.g., software code or other instructions) related to the algorithms in the memory 24.


The memory 24 may be any type of memory and/or may include any combination of types of memory. For example, the memory may be volatile memory, non-volatile memory, random access memory (RAM), FLASH, read-only memory (ROM), and/or one or more other types of memory.


The I/O port 28 may send and/or receive information and/or control signals to and/or from the cooling system 12, engine 14, one or more sensors 16, actuators, 20, 22, and/or other components of the power system 10 or components interacting with the power system 10. The I/O port 28 may be configured to communicate over a wired or wireless connection with other communicative components. Example wireless connections may include, but are not limited to, near-field communication (NFC), Wi-Fi, local area networks (LAN), wide area networks (WAN), Bluetooth®, Bluetooth® Low Energy (BLE), ZIGBEE, and/or one or more other non-proprietary or proprietary wireless connection.


In some cases, the controller 18 may be configured to control positions of actuators of the powertrain system 10 by outputting control signals 34 (e.g., control signals for setting actuator positions), as shown in FIG. 2, from the I/O port 28 or other port to drive conditions of powertrain system 10 components to an associated set point trajectory. The outputted control signals 34 may be based, at least in part on received values for one or more variables (e.g., sensor measurements 32 from components of the powertrain system 10 and/or other operating conditions, including actuator positions, of the powertrain system 10).


In one example controller 18, the controller 18 may be configured to control positions of actuators 20 of the cooling system 12, actuators 22 of the engine 14, and/or actuators of other components of the powertrain system 10 based at least in part, on receive values (e.g., from sensor measurements 32) of one or more variables. Example powertrain system 10 actuators include, but are not limited to, actuators of grill shutters, three-way valves, radiator fans, an engine pump, a turbocharger waste gage (WG), a variable geometry turbocharger (VGT), an exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) system, a start of injection (SOI) system, a throttle valve (TV), and so on. In some cases, sensors 16 may be configured to sense positions of the actuators.


As discussed and seen in FIG. 2, the controller 18 may be configured to receive values for one or more variables sensed by the sensors 16. Variables sensed by the sensors 16 may include one or more of engine in-cylinder wall temperature (e.g., temperature of a metal or other material of an engine), Tmetal, intake air temperature, Tintake air, engine oil temperature, Tengine oil, three-way valve position, grill shutter position, radiator fan position, engine pump position, engine speed, engine load, vehicle speed, and/or one or more other variables related to operation of the powertrain system 10.


The values of sensed variables (e.g., of sensor measurement signals 32) received at the controller 18 from the one or more sensors 16 may be indicative of one or more conditions of the cooling system 12 and/or the engine 14. The received variable values may be a condition of the cooling system 12 and/or the engine 14 or may be used in calculating or determining a condition of the cooling system 12 and/or the engine 14. Illustrative conditions of the cooling system 12 and/or the engine 14 may include temperature conditions, pressure conditions, flow conditions, and/or one or more other conditions.


The controller 18 may be configured to set and/or propose set point trajectories for conditions of the cooling system 12 and/or the engine 14. Once set point trajectories for conditions of the cooling system 12 and/or the engine 14 are determined, the controller 18 may be configured to adjust one or more positions of the actuators 20 of the cooling system 12 and/or actuators 22 of the engine 14 to drive a value of the one or more conditions to associated condition set point trajectories. Determining the set point trajectories and/or adjusting the actuators may be performed while the controller is on-line (e.g., the cooling system 12 and/or the engine 14 are operating (e.g., during steady state and/or transient operation of the powertrain system 10) and the controller may be receiving inputs from sensors 16) and/or other inputs in real-time.


As referred to above, condition set point trajectories for conditions of the cooling system 12 and/or the engine 14 may be determined in one or more manners. In one example, set point trajectories for conditions of the cooling system 12 and/or the engine 14 may be determined based on experience (e.g., testing) and/or modeling the cooling system 12 and the engine 14. Then, once data has been obtained from experience and/or modeling, set point trajectories for the conditions may be determined off-line and fixed for on-line consideration in setting positions of actuators of the powertrain system 10. Such a technique for determining set point trajectories does not necessarily take into consideration current operating conditions of the powertrain system 10.


Additionally, or alternatively, set point trajectories may be determined by the controller 18 while taking into consideration current operating conditions of the powertrain system. When considering current operating conditions (e.g., steady state and/or transient operating conditions) of the powertrain system 10, a controller 18 may be configured to determine set point trajectories for one or more conditions of a powertrain system 10 (e.g., conditions of a cooling system 12, engine 14, and/or other components of the powertrain system) based, at least in part, on a cost function that may optimize a set of performance variables of the cooling system 12 and/or the engine 14. Illustrative optimization of performance variables may include, but are not limited to, minimizing fuel consumption, energy consumption, minimizing parasitic losses, and so forth. In one example use of a cost function, a controller 18 may utilize a cost function configured to determine set point trajectories for one or more thermal conditions (e.g., oil temperature, engine temperature, speed of a variable speed cooling pump, and so forth) to minimize fuel consumption.


A cost function utilized by the controller 18 may take into consideration a model of the powertrain system 10, where the model may be represented by:

Cooling System/Engine Output: x_dot=F(x,u,w), Outputs: y=H(x,u,w)  (1)

“x” may represent variables for which on-engine sensor measurements may be taken (e.g., states of variables such as pressure, temperature, concentrations, turbo speed, and so on). “u” may represent manipulated variables or inputs (e.g., signals from the controller 18 to operate actuators such as a 3-way valve, grill shutters, radiator fans, an engine pump, and so forth). “w” may represent exogenous inputs such as speed, fuel, ambient conditions, and so forth. These inputs may be measured. However, some outputs of the powertrain system 10 such as performance and quality variables may not necessarily be measured, but may be inferred, approximated by modeling, estimated by trials, calculated with algorithms, and other ways.


When considering a model of the cooling system 12 and/or the engine 14, such as equation (1), a non-linear cost function, for example, may take the following form:











min
u






J

=

f


(


y


(

u
,
w

)


,
w

)






(
2
)








where f(y,u) may represent variables of the cooling system 12 and the engine 14 that may have an impact on fuel economy (e.g., fuel consumption, energy consumption, parasitic losses, and so on) of the powertrain system 10. A mechanism for computing the actuator positions, u, in real-time such that it may optimize the cost function, J, may occur on a controller that may compute optimal set point trajectories for low-level controllers as follows:












min

{


y_SP
1

,








y_SP

N
p




}







J

=




k
=
1


N
p








(



f


(


y
k

,

w
k


)


+

||


y_SP
k

-

y_SP

k
-
1





||
2

R
Δ




+

||
ɛ


||
2
G




)













Subject





to


:













y
k

=

G


(


x
k

,

y_SP
k

,

w
k


)















y
min

-
ɛ



y
k




y
max

+
ɛ






(
3
)








where ∥y_SPk−y_SPk-12RΔ may represent tuning of the controller 18, ∥ε∥2G may represent soft constraints on the model, and yk=G(xk, y_SPk, wk) and ymin−ε≤yk≤ymaxV may represent that the model is a closed-loop model. Here, k is a time index and y_SPk are the optimal set point trajectories computed by the controller.


At least in part because the model of the powertrain system 10 may be configured to output set point trajectories for the conditions of cooling system 12 and/or the engine 14, the cost function may determine set point trajectories for conditions of the cooling system 12 and/or the engine 14 in view of inputs from sensors 16 and/or other inputs, while minimizing costs and maintaining the set point trajectories and positions of actuators represented in the powertrain system model (e.g., equation (1)) within predetermined constraints. In one example, the controller 18 may be configured to determine thermal set point trajectories for the temperature of an engine housing, temperature of air in an engine intake manifold, temperature of air in an engine exhaust manifold, temperature of engine oil, temperature of transmission oil, and/or one or more other temperatures of components of the powertrain system 10. Additionally, or alternatively, set point trajectories may be determined for other conditions of the powertrain system 10, as desired. The controller 18 may be configured to update the set point trajectories of the conditions during operation of the cooling system 12 and/or engine 14 in view of received values for one or more variables sensed by the sensors 16 and/or other inputs.


In some cases, the controller 18 (e.g., a multivariable controller based on Model. Predictive Control (MPC)) may be and/or may include a supervisory controller 40 in communication with two or more powertrain component sub-controllers 42, as shown in FIG. 3. The supervisory controller 40 may be configured to include the model (e.g., equation (1)) of the powertrain system 10 and the cost function (e.g., equation (2)) of the powertrain system 10 and determine set point trajectories for one or more condition of the cooling system 12 and the engine 14 (e.g., a set point trajectory for a temperature condition of the cooling system 12 and/or the engine 14). As shown in FIG. 3, determined set point trajectories for conditions may be sent from the supervisory controller 40 to a sub-controller 42.


The sub-controllers 42 may be any type of controller. In one example, one or more sub-controllers 42 may be multivariable MPC based controllers configured to optimize output for one or more set point trajectories determined by the supervisory controller 40 and/or one or more sub-controllers 42 may be proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controllers configured to optimize output for a single set point trajectory determined by the supervisory controller 40.


In one example, the MPC based sub-controllers 42 may determine positions of actuators 20, 22 based on the following incoming sensor measurements 32 and the following cost function:












min

{


u
1

,








u

N
p




}







J

=




k
=
1


N
p








(

||


y
k

-

y
k
SP




||
2
Q



+

||


u
k

-

u
k
FF




||
3

R
R




+

||


u
k

-

u

k
-
1





||
2

R
Δ




+

||
ɛ


||
2
G








)













subject





to


:






(
4
)













y
k

=

L


(


x
k

,

u
k

,

w
k


)














u
min



u
k



u
max














y
min

-
ɛ



y
k




y
max

+
ɛ







(
5
)








Here, yksp may represent a variable for which a set point trajectory was determined by the supervisory controller 40 and yk may represent a value sensed by sensors 16 for the variable (e.g., condition) for which a set point trajectory is provided. As the MPC based sub-controller 42 may be a multivariable controller, the MPC may set values (e.g., positions) for one or more manipulated variables (e.g., positions of actuators 20, 22) to drive controlled variables (e.g., conditions) to associated set point trajectories (e.g., set point trajectories of conditions).


PID sub-controllers 42 may include a control loop feedback mechanism. In one example, the PID sub-controller 42 may calculate an error value as a difference between a measured variable and a set point trajectory for that variable, as determined by the supervisory controller 40. Over time, the PID sub-controller 42 may attempt to minimize the error by adjusting values (e.g., positions) of a manipulated variable (e.g., positions of an actuator 20, 22) to drive controlled variables (e.g., conditions) to associated set point trajectories (e.g., set point trajectories of conditions).


Once the positions of the actuators 20, 22 have been set by the sub-controllers 42 to meet the set point trajectories determined by the supervisory controller 40, the actuator positions may be sent to the cooling system 12 and/or the engine 14 and values of variables sensed by sensors 16 may be provided back to the supervisory controller 40 for use as inputs in the powertrain system cost function to determine set point trajectories of conditions and repeat the above steps.



FIG. 4 depicts an additional or alternative mechanism in which the non-linear cost function in equation (2) may be transformed into a quadratic optimization problem. The transformation may change the performance cost function into a tracking problem of a few set points, where weak directions (e.g., directions where there may be little change in the cost) are removed. The set point trajectories and/or actuator positions for conditions of a powertrain system may be determined in real time, while a powertrain system 10 is operating (e.g., during steady state and/or transient operation of the powertrain system 10). In FIG. 4, the controller 18 (e.g., a multivariable controller) may include an off-line portion 36 and an on-line portion 38, where the on-line portion 38 may be configured to operate with inputs from components of the operating powertrain system 10, whereas the off-line portion 36 of the controller 18 may operate independent of components of the powertrain system 10 that are in operation.


As discussed herein, the controller 18 may be configured in one or more control components. In one example, off-line portion 36 of the controller 18 may be configured in a separate control component than a control component in which the on-line portion 38 may be configured. In such an instance, the off-line portion 36 may be configured on a personal computer, laptop computer, server, and so forth, which may be separate from the ECU/ECM of the powertrain system 10 in which the on-line portion 38 may be configured. Alternatively, or in addition, the controller 18 may be configured in one or more other control components.


The off-line portion 36 of the controller 18 may be configured in any computing device with processing power configured to convert 44 a non-linear cost function to a quadratic program (QP) problem. An illustrative non-linear model and cost function may be represented by:












dx
t

dt

=

f


(


x
t

,

u
t

,

w
t


)



,

J
=

Σ






j


(


x
k

,

u
k

,

w
k


)




,


subject





to


:








A
i



[




x
t






u
t




]





b
i






(
6
)








To facilitate converting the non-linear cost function to a QP problem, the functions f and j of equation (6) may be approximated as follows:












dx
t

di




x
t

+


B
u



u
t


+


B
w



w
t




,

J



Σ


1
2




(




x
k






u
k




)

T



H


(

w
k

)




(




x
k






u
k




)


+



f


(

w
k

)


T



(




x
k






u
k




)








(
7
)








Then, equation (7) may be converted 44 to a QP tracking problem 46 (e.g., using Hessian eigenvectors) and tuned to the controller, which may result in:









J
=

Σ
||


z


(

t
+
k

)


-

r


(

t
+
k

)





||
2
2




+

R
Δ



Σ

||


u


(

t
+
k

)


-

u


(

t
+
k
-
1

)





||
2
2






(
8
)








The on-line portion 38 of the controller 18 may be configured to solve 48 the QP problem 46, as in equation (8), subject to:











z
t

=


S




V
T



[




x
t






u
t




]











r
t

=



S

-
1





V
T



f


(

w
t

)











x

t
+
1


=


Ax
t

+


B
u



u
t


+


B
w



w
t











F


[




x


(

t
+
k

)







u


(

t
+
k

)





]



b





(
9
)








which may represent a linear plant model and constraints. From solving for equation (8) in view of equation (9), the on-line portion 38 may identify set point trajectories for conditions (e.g., thermal conditions) of the powertrain system 10. Then, based, at least in part, on the identified set point trajectories and current operating conditions of the cooling system 12, the engine 14, and/or other components of the powertrain system 10 (e.g., inputs 32 from sensors 16 and/or other values for operating variables including, but not limited to, positions of actuators), the on-line portion 38 of the controller 18 may optimize the cost function in view of the identified set point trajectories to determine positions of actuators 20, 22 of the cooling system 12 and/or engine 14 (and/or of other components of the powertrain system 10). The determined positions of actuators 20, 22 (e.g., manipulated variables) may be configured to drive values of one or more conditions (e.g., a controlled variable) to an associated set point trajectory and output 34 to various actuators 20, 22 of the powertrain system 10.



FIG. 5 depicts an illustrative approach 100 of thermal management of a powertrain system in accordance with the powertrain system 10 disclosed herein. The approach 100 may include receiving 102 one or more values for one or more variables sensed in a component (e.g., cooling system 12, engine 14, or other component) of the powertrain system 10. Based, at least in part, on the received value(s) for one or more variables sensed in the component(s) of the powertrain system 10, a set point trajectory for a condition (e.g., a temperature, pressure, flow, or other condition) of one or more components of the powertrain system 10 may be determined 104. In one example, the set point trajectory for the condition of the one or more components of the powertrain system 10 may be determined based, at least in part, on a cost function for the operation of the powertrain system 10 and/or a component thereof. Once, the set point trajectory or trajectories are known, the controller 18 may determine optimal positions of actuators (e.g., actuators 20, 22 or other actuators) of the cooling system 12, engine 14, and/or other components of the powertrain system 10 based on received inputs during operation of the engine 14 and/or other components of the powertrain system 10. These positions of actuators may be outputted 106 as control signals configured to accordingly adjust positions of the actuators 20, 22. In some cases, the control signals may be configured to adjust actuator positions to drive a value of one or more conditions (e.g., a temperature, pressure, and/or flow) of the powertrain system 10 or component thereof to an associated set point trajectory. In some cases, the approach 100 may be performed in real time during operation of one or more components of the powertrain system 10 and implemented in a manner similar to that discussed with respect to FIG. 3, FIG. 4, or a combination of FIGS. 3 and 4.


The following is a recap of the above disclosure. A powertrain system may include an engine, a cooling system, a controller connected to the engine and the cooling system, and one or more sensors. The cooling system may be connected to the engine and may include one or more actuators. The sensor(s) may be in communication with the controller and may sense values of one or more variables of the engine and/or the cooling system. The controller may be configured to control positions of the actuators of the cooling system and receive values of variable sensed by the sensors during operation of the engine. The received values for a sensed variable may be indicative of one or more conditions of the engine and/or the cooling system. The controller may be configured to further adjust one or more positions of the actuators of the cooling system to drive a value of the one or more conditions to associated condition set point trajectories for the engine and/or cooling system.


The controller of the powertrain system may be configured to determine condition set point trajectories associated with the one or more conditions of the engine and/or the cooling system. In some cases, the controller may determine condition set point trajectories associated with the one or more conditions based, at least in part, on a cost function that optimizes a set of performance variables of the engine and/or cooling system.


Further, the controller of the powertrain system may be configured to maintain each of the condition set point trajectories within predetermined constraints.


Further, the controller of the powertrain system may be configured to maintain actuator positions within predetermined constraints when determining the condition set point trajectories associated with the one or more conditions.


Further, the controller of the powertrain system may be configured to use the cost function and sensor inputs to minimize one or more of fuel consumption of the engine and parasitic losses of the engine while maintaining one or more of the conditions and the positions of the actuators of the engine within respective constraints.


The controller of the powertrain system may be configured to update the condition set point trajectories during operation of the engine and/or cooling system in view of received values for one or more variables sensed by the one or more sensors during operation of the engine.


In the powertrain system, a condition of the one or more conditions may include a temperature condition, where the powertrain system may have a temperature condition set point trajectory for the temperature condition. The temperature condition set point trajectory may include one or more engine component temperature set point trajectories. Illustratively, the engine component temperature set point trajectories may incorporate one or more of an engine housing material temperature set point trajectory, an engine intake manifold air temperature set point trajectory, an engine exhaust manifold air temperature set point trajectory, an engine oil temperature set point trajectory, and a transmission oil temperature set point trajectory.


The controller of the powertrain system may incorporate a multivariable supervisory controller and two or more powertrain component controllers. The multivariable supervisory controller may be configured to determine one or more temperature condition set point trajectories. Each of the two or more powertrain component controllers may adjust positions of actuators associated with the powertrain component controller to drive a value of the temperature condition to the temperature condition set point trajectory.


The multivariable supervisory controller and the powertrain component controllers may receive values for one or more variables. The received values for one or more variables may be sensed by the one or more sensors during operation of the engine.


The controller of the powertrain system may incorporate a multivariable controller that includes an off-line portion configured to operate without input from an operating engine and an on-line portion configured to operate with input from an operating engine.


In the powertrain system, the off-line portion of the multivariable controller may be configured to convert a non-linear cost function into a quadratic programming problem.


The on-line portion of the multivariable controller may be configured to determine the engine and/or cooling system actuator positions. The actuator positions may be determined by solving, at least in part, a quadratic programming problem in view of current operating conditions of the engine and/or cooling system.


The on-line portion of the multivariable controller may be configured to set positions of engine and/or cooling system actuators. The positions of the engine and/or cooling system actuators may be set in view of condition set point trajectories and current operating conditions of the engine and/or cooling system.


The one or more conditions of the engine and/or cooling system may include one or more of a pressure condition, a flow condition, and a temperature condition of one or more of the engine and/or cooling system.


A powertrain thermal management system may incorporate a controller with memory, a processor in communication with the memory and an input/output (I/O) port. The I/O port may be in communication with one or more of the memory and the processor. The controller may be configured to receive, via the input/output port, values for one or more variables sensed by sensors monitoring an engine and/or cooling system connected to the engine. Based, at least in part, on the received values for the one or more variables, the controller may determine a set point trajectory for one or more engine component and/or cooling system temperatures. Via the input/output port, the controller may send control signals to adjust positions of engine actuators and/or cooling system actuators to drive values of the engine component temperatures to the determined set point trajectories based, at least in part, on the received values for one or more variables.


The engine component and/or cooling system temperatures of the powertrain thermal management system may include one or more of an engine housing material temperature; an engine intake manifold air temperature; an engine exhaust manifold air temperature; an engine oil temperature; and a transmission oil temperature.


The controller of the powertrain thermal management system may determine the set point trajectory for one or more engine component temperatures and/or cooling system component temperatures based, at least in part, on a powertrain cost function.


An approach of thermal management of a powertrain system may incorporate receiving a value for one or more variables sensed in an operating engine and determining a set point trajectory for a temperature condition of the engine based, at least in part, on the received value for one or more variables sensed in the operating engine. Further, the approach may incorporate outputting one or more control signals controlling positions of actuators of the engine and/or positions of actuators of a cooling system connected to the engine during operation of the engine. The control signals may be configured to adjust one or more positions of the actuators of the engine and/or of the cooling system to drive a value of the temperature condition to the determined set point trajectory for the temperature condition.


In the approach, the set point trajectory for a temperature condition of the engine may be based, at least in part, on a cost function for the operation of the engine.


In the approach, determining a set point trajectory for a temperature condition of the engine may incorporate determining a temperature set point trajectory for one or more engine components of the operating engine.


In the present specification, some of the matter may be of a hypothetical or prophetic nature although stated in another manner or tense.


Although the present system and/or approach has been described with respect to at least one illustrative example, many variations and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the specification. It is therefore the intention that the appended claims be interpreted as broadly as possible in view of the related art to include all such variations and modifications.

Claims
  • 1. A powertrain system comprising: an engine;a cooling system connected to the engine and having one or more actuators;a controller connected to the engine and the cooling system, the controller comprises a multivariable controller that includes an off-line portion configured to operate without input from an operating engine and an on-line portion configured to operate with input from an operating engine;one or more sensors in communication with the controller and configured to sense values of one or more variables of the engine and/or the cooling system; andwherein the controller is configured to: control positions of the one or more actuators of the cooling system;receive values for one or more variables sensed by the one or more sensors during operation of the engine, where at least one received value for a sensed variable is indicative of one or more conditions of the engine and/or the cooling system; andadjust one or more positions of the actuators of the cooling system to drive a value of the one or more conditions to associated condition set point trajectories for the engine and/or cooling system.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the controller is configured to determine condition set point trajectories associated with the one or more conditions based, at least in part, on a cost function that optimizes a set of performance variables of the engine and/or cooling system.
  • 3. The system of claim 2, wherein the controller is configured to maintain each of the condition set point trajectories within predetermined constraints.
  • 4. The system of claim 2, wherein the controller is configured to maintain actuator positions within predetermined constraints when determining the condition set point trajectories associated with the one or more conditions.
  • 5. The system of claim 2, wherein the controller is configured to use the cost function and sensor inputs to minimize one or more of fuel consumption of the engine and parasitic losses of the engine while maintaining one or more of the conditions and the positions of the actuators of the engine within respective constraints.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the controller is configured to update the condition set point trajectories during operation of the engine and/or cooling system in view of received values for one or more variables sensed by the one or more sensors during operation of the engine.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, wherein: a condition of the one or more conditions includes a temperature condition having a temperature condition set point trajectory, wherein the temperature condition set point trajectory comprises one or more engine component temperature set point trajectories; andthe engine component temperature set point trajectories comprise one or more of: an engine housing material temperature set point trajectory;an engine intake manifold air temperature set point trajectory;an engine exhaust manifold air temperature set point trajectory;an engine oil temperature set point trajectory; anda transmission oil temperature set point trajectory.
  • 8. The system of claim 1, wherein: the controller comprises a multivariable supervisory controller and two or more powertrain component controllers;the multivariable supervisory controller is configured to determine the temperature condition set point trajectory; andeach of the two or more powertrain component controllers are configured to adjust positions of actuators associated with the powertrain component controller to drive a value of the temperature condition to the temperature condition set point trajectory.
  • 9. The system of claim 8, wherein the multivariable supervisory controller and the powertrain component controllers receive values for one or more variables sensed by the one or more sensors during operation of the engine.
  • 10. The system of claim 1, wherein the off-line portion of the multivariable controller is configured to convert a non-linear cost function into a quadratic programming problem.
  • 11. The system of claim 10, wherein the on-line portion of the multivariable controller is configured to determine the engine and/or cooling system actuator positions by solving, at least in part, a quadratic programming problem in view of current operating conditions of the engine and/or cooling system.
  • 12. The system of claim 1, wherein the on-line portion of the multivariable controller is configured to set positions of engine and/or cooling system actuators in view of condition set point trajectories and current operating conditions of the engine and/or cooling system.
  • 13. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more conditions of the engine and/or cooling system include one or more of a pressure condition, a flow condition, and a temperature condition of one or more of the engine and/or cooling system.
  • 14. A powertrain thermal management system comprising: a multivariable controller that includes an off-line portion configured to operate without input from an operating engine and on-line portion configured to operate with input from an operating engine, the multivariable controller comprising: a memory;a processor in communication with the memory; andan input/output port in communication with one or more of the memory and the processor; andwherein the controller is configured to: receive, via the input/output port, values for one or more variables sensed by sensors monitoring an engine and/or cooling system connected to the engine;determine a set point trajectory for one or more engine components and/or cooling system temperatures based, at least in part, on the received values for one or more variables; andsend, via the input/output port, control signals to adjust positions of engine actuators and/or cooling system actuators to drive values of the engine component temperatures to the determined set point trajectories based, at least in part, on the received values for one or more variables.
  • 15. The system of claim 14, wherein the engine component and/or cooling system temperatures include one or more of: engine housing material temperature;engine intake manifold air temperature;engine exhaust manifold air temperature;engine oil temperature; andtransmission oil temperature.
  • 16. The system of claim 14, wherein the controller is configured to determine the set point trajectory for one or more engine component temperatures and/or cooling system component temperatures based, at least in part, on a powertrain cost function.
  • 17. A method of thermal management of a powertrain system, the method comprising: receiving a value for one or more variables sensed in an operating engine;determining a set point trajectory for a temperature condition of the engine based, at least in part, on the received value for one or more variables sensed in the operating engine;updating the set point trajectory for the temperature condition of the engine during operating of the engine in view of one or more received values for the one or more variable sensed in the operating engine; andoutputting one or more control signals controlling positions of actuators of the engine and/or positions of actuators of a cooling system connected to the engine during operation of the engine; andwherein the control signals are configured to adjust one or more positions of the actuators of the engine and/or of the cooling system to drive a value of the temperature condition to the determined set point trajectory for the temperature condition.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, wherein determining a set point trajectory for a temperature condition of the engine comprises determining a temperature set point trajectory for one or more of engine components of the operating engine.
  • 19. The method of claim 17, wherein the set point trajectory for a temperature condition of the engine is based, at least in part, on a cost function for the operation of the engine.
  • 20. A powertrain system comprising: an engine;a cooling system connected to the engine and having one or more actuators;a controller connected to the engine and the cooling system;one or more sensors in communication with the controller and configured to sense values of one or more variables of the engine and/or the cooling system; andwherein the controller is configured to: control positions of the one or more actuators of the cooling system;receive values for one or more variables sensed by the one or more sensors during operation of the engine, where at least one received value for a sensed variable is indicative of one or more conditions of the engine and/or the cooling system;adjust one or more positions of the actuators of the cooling system to drive a value of the one or more conditions to associated condition set point trajectories for the engine and/or cooling system; andupdate the condition set point trajectories during operation of the engine and/or cooling system in view of received values for one or more variables sensed by the one or more sensors during operation of the engine.
  • 21. A powertrain thermal management system comprising: a controller comprising: a memory;a processor in communication with the memory; andan input/output port in communication with one or more of the memory and the processor; andwherein the controller is configured to: receive, via the input/output port, values for one or more variables sensed by sensors monitoring an engine and/or cooling system connected to the engine;determine a set point trajectory for one or more engine components and/or cooling system temperatures based, at least in part, on the received values for one or more variables;send, via the input/output port, control signals to adjust positions of engine actuators and/or cooling system actuators to drive values of the engine component temperatures to the determined set point trajectories based, at least in part, on the received values for one or more variables; andwherein the engine component and/or cooling system temperatures include one or more of: engine housing material temperature;engine intake manifold air temperature;engine exhaust manifold air temperature;engine oil temperature; andtransmission oil temperature.
US Referenced Citations (524)
Number Name Date Kind
3744461 Davis Jul 1973 A
4005578 McInerney Feb 1977 A
4055158 Marsee Oct 1977 A
4206606 Yamada Jun 1980 A
4252098 Tomczak et al. Feb 1981 A
4359991 Stumpp et al. Nov 1982 A
4383441 Willis et al. May 1983 A
4426982 Lehner et al. Jan 1984 A
4438497 Willis et al. Mar 1984 A
4440140 Kawagoe et al. Apr 1984 A
4456883 Bullis et al. Jun 1984 A
4485794 Kimberley et al. Dec 1984 A
4601270 Kimberley et al. Jul 1986 A
4616308 Morshedi et al. Oct 1986 A
4653449 Kamel et al. Mar 1987 A
4671235 Hosaka Jun 1987 A
4735181 Kaneko et al. Apr 1988 A
4947334 Massey et al. Aug 1990 A
4962570 Hosaka et al. Oct 1990 A
5044337 Williams Sep 1991 A
5076237 Hartman et al. Dec 1991 A
5089236 Clerc Feb 1992 A
5094213 Dudek et al. Mar 1992 A
5095874 Schnaibel et al. Mar 1992 A
5108716 Nishizawa et al. Apr 1992 A
5123397 Richeson Jun 1992 A
5150289 Badavas Sep 1992 A
5186081 Richardson et al. Feb 1993 A
5233829 Komatsu Aug 1993 A
5270935 Dudek et al. Dec 1993 A
5273019 Matthews et al. Dec 1993 A
5282449 Takahashi et al. Feb 1994 A
5293553 Dudek et al. Mar 1994 A
5349816 Sanbayashi et al. Sep 1994 A
5365734 Takeshima Nov 1994 A
5394322 Hansen Feb 1995 A
5394331 Dudek et al. Feb 1995 A
5398502 Watanabe Mar 1995 A
5408406 Mathur et al. Apr 1995 A
5431139 Grutter et al. Jul 1995 A
5452576 Hamburg et al. Sep 1995 A
5477840 Neumann Dec 1995 A
5560208 Halimi et al. Oct 1996 A
5570574 Yamashita et al. Nov 1996 A
5598825 Neumann Feb 1997 A
5609139 Ueda et al. Mar 1997 A
5611198 Lane et al. Mar 1997 A
5682317 Keeler et al. Oct 1997 A
5690086 Kawano et al. Nov 1997 A
5692478 Nogi et al. Dec 1997 A
5697339 Esposito Dec 1997 A
5704011 Hansen et al. Dec 1997 A
5740033 Wassick et al. Apr 1998 A
5746183 Parke et al. May 1998 A
5765533 Nakajima Jun 1998 A
5771867 Amstutz et al. Jun 1998 A
5785030 Paas Jul 1998 A
5788004 Friedmann et al. Aug 1998 A
5842340 Bush et al. Dec 1998 A
5846157 Reinke et al. Dec 1998 A
5893092 Driscoll Apr 1999 A
5917405 Joao Jun 1999 A
5924280 Tarabulski Jul 1999 A
5942195 Lecea et al. Aug 1999 A
5964199 Atago et al. Oct 1999 A
5970075 Wasada Oct 1999 A
5974788 Hepburn et al. Nov 1999 A
5995895 Wall et al. Nov 1999 A
6029626 Bruestle Feb 2000 A
6035640 Kolmanovsky et al. Mar 2000 A
6048620 Zhong Apr 2000 A
6048628 Hilman et al. Apr 2000 A
6055810 Borland et al. May 2000 A
6056781 Wassick et al. May 2000 A
6058700 Yamashita et al. May 2000 A
6067800 Kolmanovsky et al. May 2000 A
6076353 Freudenberg et al. Jun 2000 A
6105365 Deeba et al. Aug 2000 A
6122555 Lu Sep 2000 A
6134883 Kato et al. Oct 2000 A
6153159 Engeler et al. Nov 2000 A
6161528 Akao et al. Dec 2000 A
6170259 Boegner et al. Jan 2001 B1
6171556 Burk et al. Jan 2001 B1
6178743 Hirota et al. Jan 2001 B1
6178749 Kolmanovsky et al. Jan 2001 B1
6208914 Ward et al. Mar 2001 B1
6216083 Ulyanov et al. Apr 2001 B1
6233922 Maloney May 2001 B1
6236956 Mantooth et al. May 2001 B1
6237330 Takahashi et al. May 2001 B1
6242873 Drozdz et al. Jun 2001 B1
6263672 Roby et al. Jul 2001 B1
6273060 Cullen Aug 2001 B1
6279551 Iwano et al. Aug 2001 B1
6312538 Latypov et al. Nov 2001 B1
6314351 Chutorash Nov 2001 B1
6314662 Ellis, III Nov 2001 B1
6314724 Kakuyama et al. Nov 2001 B1
6321538 Hasler et al. Nov 2001 B2
6327361 Harshavardhana et al. Dec 2001 B1
6338245 Shimoda et al. Jan 2002 B1
6341487 Takahashi et al. Jan 2002 B1
6347619 Whiting et al. Feb 2002 B1
6360159 Miller et al. Mar 2002 B1
6360541 Waszkiewicz et al. Mar 2002 B2
6360732 Bailey et al. Mar 2002 B1
6363715 Bidner et al. Apr 2002 B1
6363907 Arai et al. Apr 2002 B1
6379281 Collins et al. Apr 2002 B1
6389203 Jordan et al. May 2002 B1
6425371 Majima Jul 2002 B2
6427436 Allansson et al. Aug 2002 B1
6431160 Sugiyama et al. Aug 2002 B1
6445963 Blevins et al. Sep 2002 B1
6446430 Roth et al. Sep 2002 B1
6453308 Zhao et al. Sep 2002 B1
6463733 Zhao et al. Oct 2002 B1
6463734 Tamura et al. Oct 2002 B1
6466893 Latwesen et al. Oct 2002 B1
6470682 Gray, Jr. Oct 2002 B2
6470862 Isobe et al. Oct 2002 B2
6470886 Jestrabek-Hart Oct 2002 B1
6481139 Weldle Nov 2002 B2
6494038 Kobayashi et al. Dec 2002 B2
6502391 Hirota et al. Jan 2003 B1
6505465 Kanazawa et al. Jan 2003 B2
6510351 Blevins et al. Jan 2003 B1
6512974 Houston et al. Jan 2003 B2
6513495 Franke et al. Feb 2003 B1
6532433 Bharadwaj et al. Mar 2003 B2
6542076 Joao Apr 2003 B1
6546329 Bellinger Apr 2003 B2
6549130 Joao Apr 2003 B1
6550307 Zhang et al. Apr 2003 B1
6553754 Meyer et al. Apr 2003 B2
6560528 Gitlin et al. May 2003 B1
6560960 Nishimura et al. May 2003 B2
6571191 York et al. May 2003 B1
6579206 Liu et al. Jun 2003 B2
6591605 Lewis Jul 2003 B2
6594990 Kuenstler et al. Jul 2003 B2
6601387 Zurawski et al. Aug 2003 B2
6612293 Schweinzer et al. Sep 2003 B2
6615584 Ostertag Sep 2003 B2
6625978 Eriksson et al. Sep 2003 B1
6629408 Murakami et al. Oct 2003 B1
6637382 Brehob et al. Oct 2003 B1
6644017 Takahashi et al. Nov 2003 B2
6647710 Nishiyama et al. Nov 2003 B2
6647971 Vaughan et al. Nov 2003 B2
6651614 Flamig-Vetter et al. Nov 2003 B2
6662058 Sanchez Dec 2003 B1
6666198 Mitsutani Dec 2003 B2
6666410 Boelitz et al. Dec 2003 B2
6671596 Kawashima et al. Dec 2003 B2
6671603 Cari et al. Dec 2003 B2
6672052 Taga et al. Jan 2004 B2
6672060 Buckland et al. Jan 2004 B1
6679050 Takahashi et al. Jan 2004 B1
6687597 Sulatisky et al. Feb 2004 B2
6688283 Jaye Feb 2004 B2
6694244 Meyer et al. Feb 2004 B2
6694724 Tanaka et al. Feb 2004 B2
6705084 Allen et al. Mar 2004 B2
6718254 Hashimoto et al. Apr 2004 B2
6718753 Bromberg et al. Apr 2004 B2
6725208 Hartman et al. Apr 2004 B1
6736120 Sumilla May 2004 B2
6738682 Pasadyn May 2004 B1
6739122 Kitajima et al. May 2004 B2
6742330 Genderen Jun 2004 B2
6743352 Ando et al. Jun 2004 B2
6748936 Kinomura et al. Jun 2004 B2
6752131 Poola et al. Jun 2004 B2
6752135 McLaughlin et al. Jun 2004 B2
6757579 Pasadyn Jun 2004 B1
6758037 Terada et al. Jul 2004 B2
6760631 Berkowitz et al. Jul 2004 B1
6760657 Katoh Jul 2004 B2
6760658 Yasui et al. Jul 2004 B2
6770009 Badillo et al. Aug 2004 B2
6772585 Iihoshi et al. Aug 2004 B2
6775623 Ali et al. Aug 2004 B2
6779344 Hartman et al. Aug 2004 B2
6779512 Mitsutani Aug 2004 B2
6788072 Nagy et al. Sep 2004 B2
6789533 Hashimoto et al. Sep 2004 B1
6792927 Kobayashi Sep 2004 B2
6804618 Junk Oct 2004 B2
6814062 Esteghlal et al. Nov 2004 B2
6817171 Zhu Nov 2004 B2
6823667 Braun et al. Nov 2004 B2
6826903 Yahata et al. Dec 2004 B2
6827060 Huh Dec 2004 B2
6827061 Nytomt et al. Dec 2004 B2
6827070 Fehl et al. Dec 2004 B2
6834497 Miyoshi et al. Dec 2004 B2
6837042 Colignon et al. Jan 2005 B2
6839637 Moteki et al. Jan 2005 B2
6849030 Yamamoto et al. Feb 2005 B2
6857264 Ament Feb 2005 B2
6873675 Kurady et al. Mar 2005 B2
6874467 Hunt et al. Apr 2005 B2
6879906 Makki et al. Apr 2005 B2
6882929 Liang et al. Apr 2005 B2
6904751 Makki et al. Jun 2005 B2
6911414 Kimura et al. Jun 2005 B2
6915779 Sriprakash Jul 2005 B2
6920865 Lyon Jul 2005 B2
6923902 Ando et al. Aug 2005 B2
6925372 Yasui Aug 2005 B2
6925796 Nieuwstadt et al. Aug 2005 B2
6928362 Meaney Aug 2005 B2
6928817 Ahmad Aug 2005 B2
6931840 Strayer et al. Aug 2005 B2
6934931 Plumer et al. Aug 2005 B2
6941744 Tanaka Sep 2005 B2
6945033 Sealy et al. Sep 2005 B2
6948310 Roberts, Jr. et al. Sep 2005 B2
6953024 Linna et al. Oct 2005 B2
6965826 Andres et al. Nov 2005 B2
6968677 Tamura Nov 2005 B2
6971258 Rhodes et al. Dec 2005 B2
6973382 Rodriguez et al. Dec 2005 B2
6978744 Yuasa et al. Dec 2005 B2
6988017 Pasadyn et al. Jan 2006 B2
6990401 Neiss et al. Jan 2006 B2
6996975 Radhamohan et al. Feb 2006 B2
7000379 Makki et al. Feb 2006 B2
7013637 Yoshida Mar 2006 B2
7016779 Bowyer Mar 2006 B2
7028464 Rosel et al. Apr 2006 B2
7039475 Sayyarrodsari et al. May 2006 B2
7047938 Flynn et al. May 2006 B2
7050863 Mehta et al. May 2006 B2
7052434 Makino et al. May 2006 B2
7055311 Beutel et al. Jun 2006 B2
7059112 Bidner et al. Jun 2006 B2
7063080 Kita et al. Jun 2006 B2
7067319 Wills et al. Jun 2006 B2
7069903 Surnilla et al. Jul 2006 B2
7082753 Dalla Betta et al. Aug 2006 B2
7085615 Persson et al. Aug 2006 B2
7106866 Astorino et al. Sep 2006 B2
7107978 Itoyama Sep 2006 B2
7111450 Surnilla Sep 2006 B2
7111455 Okugawa et al. Sep 2006 B2
7113835 Boyen et al. Sep 2006 B2
7117046 Boyden et al. Oct 2006 B2
7124013 Yasui Oct 2006 B2
7149590 Martin et al. Dec 2006 B2
7151976 Lin Dec 2006 B2
7152023 Das Dec 2006 B2
7155334 Stewart et al. Dec 2006 B1
7164800 Sun Jan 2007 B2
7165393 Betta et al. Jan 2007 B2
7165399 Stewart Jan 2007 B2
7168239 Ingram et al. Jan 2007 B2
7182075 Shahed et al. Feb 2007 B2
7184845 Sayyarrodsari et al. Feb 2007 B2
7184992 Polyak et al. Feb 2007 B1
7188637 Dreyer et al. Mar 2007 B2
7194987 Mogi Mar 2007 B2
7197485 Fuller Mar 2007 B2
7200988 Yamashita Apr 2007 B2
7204079 Audoin Apr 2007 B2
7212908 Li et al. May 2007 B2
7275374 Stewart et al. Oct 2007 B2
7275415 Rhodes et al. Oct 2007 B2
7277010 Joao Oct 2007 B2
7281368 Miyake et al. Oct 2007 B2
7292926 Schmidt et al. Nov 2007 B2
7302937 Ma et al. Dec 2007 B2
7321834 Chu et al. Jan 2008 B2
7323036 Boyden et al. Jan 2008 B2
7328577 Stewart et al. Feb 2008 B2
7337022 Wojsznis et al. Feb 2008 B2
7349776 Spillane et al. Mar 2008 B2
7357125 Kolavennu Apr 2008 B2
7375374 Chen et al. May 2008 B2
7376471 Das et al. May 2008 B2
7380547 Ruiz Jun 2008 B1
7383118 Imai et al. Jun 2008 B2
7389773 Stewart et al. Jun 2008 B2
7392129 Hill et al. Jun 2008 B2
7397363 Joao Jul 2008 B2
7398082 Schwinke et al. Jul 2008 B2
7398149 Ueno et al. Jul 2008 B2
7400933 Rawlings et al. Jul 2008 B2
7400967 Ueno et al. Jul 2008 B2
7413583 Langer et al. Aug 2008 B2
7415389 Stewart et al. Aug 2008 B2
7418372 Nishira et al. Aug 2008 B2
7430854 Yasui et al. Oct 2008 B2
7433743 Pistikopoulos et al. Oct 2008 B2
7444191 Caldwell et al. Oct 2008 B2
7444193 Cutler Oct 2008 B2
7447554 Cutler Nov 2008 B2
7467614 Stewart et al. Dec 2008 B2
7469177 Samad et al. Dec 2008 B2
7474953 Hulser et al. Jan 2009 B2
7493236 Mock et al. Feb 2009 B1
7505879 Tomoyasu et al. Mar 2009 B2
7505882 Jenny et al. Mar 2009 B2
7515975 Stewart Apr 2009 B2
7522963 Boyden et al. Apr 2009 B2
7536232 Boyden et al. May 2009 B2
7577483 Fan et al. Aug 2009 B2
7587253 Rawlings et al. Sep 2009 B2
7591135 Stewart Sep 2009 B2
7599749 Sayyarrodsari et al. Oct 2009 B2
7599750 Piche Oct 2009 B2
7603185 Stewart et al. Oct 2009 B2
7603226 Henein Oct 2009 B2
7627843 Dozorets et al. Dec 2009 B2
7630868 Turner et al. Dec 2009 B2
7634323 Vermillion et al. Dec 2009 B2
7634417 Boyden et al. Dec 2009 B2
7650780 Hall Jan 2010 B2
7668704 Perchanok et al. Feb 2010 B2
7676318 Allain Mar 2010 B2
7698004 Boyden et al. Apr 2010 B2
7702519 Boyden et al. Apr 2010 B2
7712139 Westendorf et al. May 2010 B2
7721030 Fuehrer et al. May 2010 B2
7725199 Brackney et al. May 2010 B2
7734291 Mazzara, Jr. Jun 2010 B2
7738975 Denison et al. Jun 2010 B2
7743606 Havelena et al. Jun 2010 B2
7748217 Muller Jul 2010 B2
7752840 Stewart Jul 2010 B2
7765792 Rhodes et al. Aug 2010 B2
7779680 Sasaki et al. Aug 2010 B2
7793489 Wang et al. Sep 2010 B2
7798938 Matsubara et al. Sep 2010 B2
7808371 Blanchet et al. Oct 2010 B2
7813884 Chu et al. Oct 2010 B2
7826909 Attarwala Nov 2010 B2
7831318 Bartee et al. Nov 2010 B2
7840287 Wojsznis et al. Nov 2010 B2
7844351 Piche Nov 2010 B2
7844352 Vouzis et al. Nov 2010 B2
7846299 Backstrom et al. Dec 2010 B2
7850104 Havlena et al. Dec 2010 B2
7856966 Saitoh Dec 2010 B2
7860586 Boyden et al. Dec 2010 B2
7861518 Federle Jan 2011 B2
7862771 Boyden et al. Jan 2011 B2
7877239 Grichnik et al. Jan 2011 B2
7878178 Stewart et al. Feb 2011 B2
7891669 Araujo et al. Feb 2011 B2
7904280 Wood Mar 2011 B2
7905103 Larsen et al. Mar 2011 B2
7907769 Sammak et al. Mar 2011 B2
7925399 Comeau Apr 2011 B2
7930044 Attarwala Apr 2011 B2
7933849 Bartee et al. Apr 2011 B2
7958730 Stewart et al. Jun 2011 B2
7970482 Srinivasan et al. Jun 2011 B2
7987145 Baramov Jul 2011 B2
7996140 Stewart et al. Aug 2011 B2
8001767 Kakuya et al. Aug 2011 B2
8019911 Dressler et al. Sep 2011 B2
8025167 Schneider et al. Sep 2011 B2
8032235 Sayyar-Rodsari Oct 2011 B2
8046089 Renfro et al. Oct 2011 B2
8046090 MacArthur et al. Oct 2011 B2
8060290 Stewart et al. Nov 2011 B2
8078291 Pekar et al. Dec 2011 B2
8108790 Morrison, Jr. et al. Jan 2012 B2
8109255 Stewart et al. Feb 2012 B2
8121818 Gorinevsky Feb 2012 B2
8145329 Pekar et al. Mar 2012 B2
8146850 Havlena et al. Apr 2012 B2
8157035 Whitney et al. Apr 2012 B2
8185217 Thiele May 2012 B2
8197753 Boyden et al. Jun 2012 B2
8200346 Thiele Jun 2012 B2
8209963 Kesse et al. Jul 2012 B2
8229163 Coleman et al. Jul 2012 B2
8245501 He et al. Aug 2012 B2
8246508 Matsubara et al. Aug 2012 B2
8265854 Stewart et al. Sep 2012 B2
8281572 Chi et al. Oct 2012 B2
8295951 Crisalle et al. Oct 2012 B2
8311653 Zhan et al. Nov 2012 B2
8312860 Yun et al. Nov 2012 B2
8316235 Boehl et al. Nov 2012 B2
8360040 Stewart et al. Jan 2013 B2
8370052 Lin Feb 2013 B2
8379267 Mestha et al. Feb 2013 B2
8396644 Kabashima et al. Mar 2013 B2
8402268 Dierickx Mar 2013 B2
8418441 He et al. Apr 2013 B2
8453431 Wang et al. Jun 2013 B2
8473079 Havlena Jun 2013 B2
8478506 Grichnik et al. Jul 2013 B2
RE44452 Stewart et al. Aug 2013 E
8504175 Pekar et al. Aug 2013 B2
8505278 Farrell et al. Aug 2013 B2
8543170 Mazzara, Jr. et al. Sep 2013 B2
8555613 Wang et al. Oct 2013 B2
8571689 Macharia et al. Oct 2013 B2
8596045 Tuomivaara et al. Dec 2013 B2
8620461 Kihas Dec 2013 B2
8634940 Macharia et al. Jan 2014 B2
8639925 Schuetze Jan 2014 B2
8649884 MacArthur et al. Feb 2014 B2
8649961 Hawkins et al. Feb 2014 B2
8667288 Yavuz Mar 2014 B2
8694197 Rajagopalan et al. Apr 2014 B2
8700291 Herrmann Apr 2014 B2
8751241 Oesterling et al. Jun 2014 B2
8762026 Wolfe et al. Jun 2014 B2
8763377 Yacoub Jul 2014 B2
8768996 Shokrollahi et al. Jul 2014 B2
8813690 Kumar et al. Aug 2014 B2
8825243 Yang et al. Sep 2014 B2
8839967 Schneider et al. Sep 2014 B2
8867746 Ceskutti et al. Oct 2014 B2
8892221 Kram et al. Nov 2014 B2
8899018 Frazier et al. Dec 2014 B2
8904760 Mital Dec 2014 B2
8983069 Merchan et al. Mar 2015 B2
9100193 Newsome et al. Aug 2015 B2
9141996 Christensen et al. Sep 2015 B2
9170573 Kihas Oct 2015 B2
9175595 Ceynow Nov 2015 B2
9223301 Stewart et al. Dec 2015 B2
9243576 Yu et al. Jan 2016 B2
9253200 Schwarz et al. Feb 2016 B2
9325494 Boehl Apr 2016 B2
9367701 Merchan et al. Jun 2016 B2
9367968 Giraud et al. Jun 2016 B2
9483881 Comeau et al. Nov 2016 B2
9560071 Ruvio et al. Jan 2017 B2
9779742 Newsome, Jr. Oct 2017 B2
20020112469 Kanazawa et al. Aug 2002 A1
20040006973 Makki et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040086185 Sun May 2004 A1
20040144082 Mianzo et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040199481 Hartman et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040226287 Edgar et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050171667 Morita Aug 2005 A1
20050187643 Sayyar-Rodsari et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050193739 Brunnell et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050210868 Funabashi Sep 2005 A1
20060047607 Boyden et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060111881 Jackson May 2006 A1
20060137347 Stewart et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060168945 Samad et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060185626 Allen et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060212140 Brackney Sep 2006 A1
20070144149 Kolavennu et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070156259 Baramov et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070240213 Karam et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070261648 Reckels et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070275471 Coward Nov 2007 A1
20080010973 Gimbres Jan 2008 A1
20080103747 Macharia et al. May 2008 A1
20080132178 Chatterjee et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080208778 Sayyar-Rodsari et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080289605 Ito Nov 2008 A1
20090172416 Bosch et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090312998 Berckmans et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100122523 Vosz May 2010 A1
20100126481 Willi et al. May 2010 A1
20100300069 Herrmann et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110056265 Yacoub Mar 2011 A1
20110060424 Havlena Mar 2011 A1
20110125295 Bednasch et al. May 2011 A1
20110131017 Cheng et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110167025 Danai et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110173315 Aguren Jul 2011 A1
20110264353 Atkinson et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110270505 Chaturvedi et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120024089 Couey et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120109620 Gaikwad et al. May 2012 A1
20120174187 Argon et al. Jul 2012 A1
20130024069 Wang et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130067894 Stewart et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130111878 Pachner et al. May 2013 A1
20130111905 Pekar et al. May 2013 A1
20130131954 Yu et al. May 2013 A1
20130131956 Thibault et al. May 2013 A1
20130158834 Wagner et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130204403 Zheng et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130242706 Newsome, Jr. Sep 2013 A1
20130326232 Lewis et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130326630 Argon Dec 2013 A1
20130338900 Ardanese et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140032189 Hehle et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140034460 Chou Feb 2014 A1
20140171856 McLaughlin et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140258736 Merchan et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140270163 Merchan Sep 2014 A1
20140316683 Whitney et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140318216 Singh Oct 2014 A1
20140343713 Ziegler et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140358254 Chu et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150121071 Schwarz et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150275783 Wong et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150321642 Schwepp et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150324576 Quirant et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150334093 Mueller Nov 2015 A1
20150354877 Burns et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160003180 McNulty et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160043832 Ahn et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160108732 Huang et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160127357 Zibuschka et al. May 2016 A1
20160216699 Pekar et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160239593 Pekar et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160259584 Schlottmann et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160330204 Baur et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160344705 Stumpf et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160362838 Badwe et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160365977 Boutros et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170031332 Santin Feb 2017 A1
20170048063 Mueller Feb 2017 A1
20170126701 Glas et al. May 2017 A1
20170218860 Pachner et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170300713 Fan et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170306871 Fuxman et al. Oct 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (52)
Number Date Country
102063561 May 2011 CN
102331350 Jan 2012 CN
19628796 Oct 1997 DE
10219382 Nov 2002 DE
102009016509 Oct 2010 DE
102011103346 Aug 2012 DE
0301527 Feb 1989 EP
0877309 Jun 2000 EP
1134368 Sep 2001 EP
1180583 Feb 2002 EP
1221544 Jul 2002 EP
1225490 Jul 2002 EP
1245811 Oct 2002 EP
1273337 Jan 2003 EP
0950803 Sep 2003 EP
1420153 May 2004 EP
1447727 Aug 2004 EP
1498791 Jan 2005 EP
1425642 Nov 2005 EP
1686251 Aug 2006 EP
1399784 Oct 2007 EP
2107439 Oct 2009 EP
2146258 Jan 2010 EP
1794339 Jul 2011 EP
1529941 Nov 2011 EP
2543845 Jan 2013 EP
2551480 Jan 2013 EP
2589779 May 2013 EP
2617975 Jul 2013 EP
2267559 Jan 2014 EP
2919079 Sep 2015 EP
59190433 Oct 1984 JP
2010282618 Dec 2010 JP
0144629 Jun 2001 WO
WO 0169056 Sep 2001 WO
0232552 Apr 2002 WO
02097540 Dec 2002 WO
02101208 Dec 2002 WO
03023538 Mar 2003 WO
03048533 Jun 2003 WO
03065135 Aug 2003 WO
03078816 Sep 2003 WO
03102394 Dec 2003 WO
2004027230 Apr 2004 WO
2006021437 Mar 2006 WO
2007078907 Jul 2007 WO
2008033800 Mar 2008 WO
2008115911 Sep 2008 WO
2012076838 Jun 2012 WO
2013119665 Aug 2013 WO
2014165439 Oct 2014 WO
2016053194 Apr 2016 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (184)
Entry
Delphi, Delphi Diesel NOx Trap (DNT), 3 pages, Feb. 2004.
Diehl et al., “Efficient Numerical Methods for Nonlinear MPC and Moving Horizon Estimation,” Int. Workshop on Assessment and Future Directions of NMPC, 24 pages, Pavia, Italy, Sep. 5-9, 2008.
Ding, “Characterising Combustion in Diesel Engines, Using Parameterised Finite Stage Cylinder Process Models,” 281 pages, Dec. 21, 2011.
Docquier et al., “Combustion Control and Sensors: a Review,” Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, vol. 28, pp. 107-150, 2002.
Dunbar, “Model Predictive Control: Extension to Coordinated Multi-Vehicle Formations and Real-Time Implementation,” CDS Technical Report 01-016, 64 pages, Dec. 7, 2001.
Egnell, “Combustion Diagnostics by Means of Multizone Heat Release Analysis and NO Calculation,” SAE Technical Paper Series 981424, International Spring Fuels and Lubricants Meeting and Exposition, 22 pages, May 4-6, 1998.
Ericson, “NOx Modelling of a Complete Diesel Engine/SCR System,” Licentiate Thesis, 57 pages, 2007.
Finesso et al., “Estimation of the Engine-Out NO2/NOx Ration in a Euro VI Diesel Engine,” SAE International 2013-01-0317, 15 pages, Apr. 8, 2013.
Fleming, “Overview of Automotive Sensors,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 296-308, Dec. 2001.
Ford Motor Company, “2012 My OBD System Operation Summary for 6.7L Diesel Engines,” 149 pages, Apr. 21, 2011.
Formentin et al., “NOx Estimation in Diesel Engines via In-Cylinder Pressure Measurement,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 396-403, Jan. 2014.
Galindo, “An On-Engine Method for Dynamic Characterisation of NOx Concentration Sensors,” Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, vol. 35, pp. 470-476, 2011.
Gamma Technologies, “Exhaust Aftertreatment with GT-Suite,” 2 pages, Jul. 17, 2014.
GM “Advanced Diesel Technology and Emissions,” powertrain technologies—engines, 2 pages, prior to Feb. 2, 2005.
Guardiola et al., “A Bias Correction Method for Fast Fuel-to-Air Ratio Estimation in Diesel Engines,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, vol. 227, No. 8, pp. 1099-1111, 2013.
Guardiola et al., “A Computationally Efficient Kalman Filter Based Estimator for Updating Look-Up Tables Applied to NOx Estimation in Diesel Engines,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 21, pp. 1455-1468.
Guerreiro et al., “Trajectory Tracking Nonlinear Model Predictive Control for Autonomous Surface Craft,” Proceedings of the European Control Conference, Budapest, Hungary, 6 pages, Aug. 2009.
Guzzella et al., “Introduction to Modeling and Control of Internal Combustion Engine Systems,” 303 pages, 2004.
Guzzella, et al., “Control of Diesel Engines,” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, pp. 53-71, Oct. 1998.
Hahlin, “Single Cylinder ICE Exhaust Optimization,” Master's Thesis, retrieved from https://pure.Itu.se/portal/files/44015424/LTU-EX-2013-43970821.pdf, 50 pages, Feb. 1, 2014.
Havelena, “Componentized Architecture for Advanced Process Management,” Honeywell International, 42 pages, 2004.
Heywood, “Pollutant Formation and Control,” Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals, pp. 567-667, 1988.
Hiranuma, et al., “Development of DPF System for Commercial Vehicle—Basic Characteristic and Active Regeneration Performance,” SAE Paper No. 2003-01-3182, Mar. 2003.
Hirsch et al., “Dynamic Engine Emission Models,” Automotive Model Predictive Control, Chapter 5, 18 pages, LNCIS 402, 2012.
Hirsch et al., “Grey-Box Control Oriented Emissions Models,” The International Federation of Automatic Control (IFAC), Proceedings of the 17th World Congress, pp. 8514-8519, Jul. 6-11, 2008.
Hockerdal, “EKF-based Adaptation of Look-Up Tables with an Air Mass-Flow Sensor Application,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 19, 12 pages, 2011.
Honeywell, “Profit Optimizer a Distributed Quadratic Program (DQP) Concepts Reference,” 48 pages, prior to Feb. 2, 2005.
http://nexceris.com/news/nextech-materials/, “Nextech Materials is Now Nexceris,” 7 pages, printed Oct. 4, 2016.
http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/obdprog/hdobdreg.htm, “Heavy-Duty OBD Regulations and Rulemaking,” 8 pages, printed Oct. 4, 2016.
http://www.not2fast.wryday.com/turbo/glossary/turbo_glossary.shtml, “Not2Fast: Turbo Glossary,” 22 pages, printed Oct. 1, 2004.
http://www.tai-cwv.com/sbl106.0.html, “Technical Overview—Advanced Control Solutions,” 6 pages, printed Sep. 9, 2004.
https://www.dieselnet.com/standards/us/obd.php, “Emission Standards: USA: On-Board Diagnostics,” 6 pages, printed Oct. 3, 2016.
Ishida et al., “An Analysis of the Added Water Effect on NO Formation in D.I. Diesel Engines,” SAE Technical Paper Series 941691, International Off-Highway and Power-Plant Congress and Exposition, 13 pages, Sep. 12-14, 1994.
Ishida et al., “Prediction of NOx Reduction Rate Due to Port Water Injection in a DI Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper Series 972961, International Fall Fuels and Lubricants Meeting and Exposition, 13 pages, Oct. 13-16, 1997.
Jensen, “The 13 Monitors of an OBD System,” http://www.oemoffhighway.com/article/1 0855512/the-13-monito . . . , 3 pages, printed Oct. 3, 2016.
Johansen et al., “Hardware Architecture Design for Explicit Model Predictive Control,” Proceedings of ACC, 6 pages, 2006.
Johansen et al., “Hardware Synthesis of Explicit Model Predictive Controllers,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 15, No. 1, Jan. 2007.
Jonsson, “Fuel Optimized Predictive Following in Low Speed Conditions,” Master's Thesis, 46 pages, Jun. 28, 2003.
Kelly, et al., “Reducing Soot Emissions from Diesel Engines Using One Atmosphere Uniform Glow Discharge Plasma,” SAE Paper No. 2003-01-1183, Mar. 2003.
Keulen et al., “Predictive Cruise Control in Hybrid Electric Vehicles,” World Electric Journal, vol. 3, ISSN 2032-6653, 11 pages, May 2009.
Khair et al., “Emission Formation in Diesel Engines,” Downloaded from https://www.dieselnet.com/tech/diesel.emiform.php, 33 pages, printed Oct. 14, 2016.
Kihas et al., “Chapter 14, Diesel Engine SCR Systems: Modeling Measurements and Control,” Catalytic Reduction Technology (book), Part 1, Chapter 14, prior to Jan. 29, 2016.
Kolmanovsky et al., “Issues in Modeling and Control of Intake Flow in Variable Geometry Turbocharged Engines”, 18th IFIP Conf. System Modeling and Optimization, pp. 436-445, Jul. 1997.
Krause et al., “Effect of Inlet Air Humidity and Temperature on Diesel Exhaust Emissions,” SAE International Automotive Engineering Congress, 8 pages, Jan. 8-12, 1973.
Kulhavy et al. “Emerging Technologies for Enterprise Optimization in the Process Industries,” Honeywell, 12 pages, Dec. 2000.
Lavoie et al., “Experimental and Theoretical Study of Nitric Oxide Formation in Internal Combustion Engines,” Combustion Science and Technology, vol. 1, pp. 313-326, 1970.
Locker, et al., “Diesel Particulate Filter Operational Characterization,” Coming Incorporated, 10 pages, prior to Feb. 2, 2005.
Lu, “Challenging Control Problems and Engineering Technologies in Enterprise Optimization,” Honeywell Hi-Spec Solutions, 30 pages, Jun. 4-6, 2001.
Maciejowski, “Predictive Control with Constraints,” Prentice Hall, Pearson Education Limited, 4 pages, 2002.
Manchur et al., “Time Resolution Effects on Accuracy of Real-Time NOx Emissions Measurements,” SAE Technical Paper Series 2005-01-0674, 2005 SAE World Congress, 19 pages, Apr. 11-14, 2005.
Mariethoz et al., “Sensorless Explicit Model Predictive Control of the DC-DC Buck Converter with Inductor Current Limitation,” IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, pp. 1710-1715, 2008.
Marjanovic, “Towards a Simplified Infinite Horizon Model Predictive Controller,” 6 pages, Proceedings of the 5th Asian Control Conference, 6 pages, Jul. 20-23, 2004.
Mehta, “The Application of Model Predictive Control to Active Automotive Suspensions,” 56 pages, May 17, 1996.
Mohammadpour et al., “A Survey on Diagnostics Methods for Automotive Engines,” 2011 American Control Conference, pp. 985-990, Jun. 29-Jul. 1, 2011.
Moore, “Living with Cooled-EGR Engines,” Prevention Illustrated, 3 pages, Oct. 3, 2004.
Moos, “Catalysts as Sensors—A Promising Novel Approach in Automotive Exhaust Gas Aftertreatment,” http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/10/7/6773htm, 10 pages, Jul. 13, 2010.
Murayama et al., “Speed Control of Vehicles with Variable Valve Lift Engine by Nonlinear MPC,” ICROS-SICE International Joint Conference, pp. 4128-4133, 2009.
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), “Diesel Emissions Control- Sulfur Effects Project (DECSE) Summary of Reports,” U.S. Department of Energy, 19 pages, Feb. 2002.
Olsen, “Analysis and Simulation of the Rate of Heat Release (ROHR) in Diesel Engines,” MSc-Assignment, 105 pages, Jun. 2013.
Ortner et al., “MPC for a Diesel Engine Air Path Using an Explicit Approach for Constraint Systems,” Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE Conference on Control Applications, Munich Germany, pp. 2760-2765, Oct. 4-6, 2006.
Ortner et al., “Predictive Control of a Diesel Engine Air Path,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 449-456, May 2007.
Pannocchia et al., “Combined Design of Disturbance Model and Observer for Offset-Free Model Predictive Control,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 52, No. 6, 6 pages, 2007.
Patrinos et al., “A Global Piecewise Smooth Newton Method for Fast Large-Scale Model Predictive Control,” Tech Report TR2010-02, National Technical University of Athens, 23 pages, 2010.
Payri et al., “Diesel NOx Modeling with a Reduction Mechanism for the Initial NOx Coming from EGR or Re-Entrained Burned Gases,” 2008 World Congress, SAE Technical Paper Series 2008-01-1188, 13 pages, Apr. 14-17, 2008.
Payri et al., “Methodology for Design and Calibration of a Drift Compensation Method for Fuel-to-Air Ratio,” SAE International 2012-01-0717, 13 pages, Apr. 16, 2012.
Pipho et al., “NO2 Formation in a Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper Series 910231, International Congress and Exposition, 15 pages, Feb. 25-Mar. 1, 1991.
Qin et al., “A Survey of Industrial Model Predictive Control Technology,” Control Engineering Practice, 11, pp. 733-764, 2003.
Querel et al., “Control of an SCR System Using a Virtual NOx Sensor,” 7th IFAC Symposium on Advances in Automotive Control, The International Federation of Automotive Control, pp. 9-14, Sep. 4-7, 2013.
Rajamani, “Data-based Techniques to Improve State Estimation in Model Predictive Control,” PhD. Dissertation, 257 pages, 2007.
Rawlings, “Tutorial Overview of Model Predictive Control,” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, pp. 38-52, Jun. 2000.
Ricardo Software, “Powertrain Design at Your Fingertips,” retrieved from http://www.ricardo.com/PageFiles/864/WaveFlyerA4_4PP.pdf, 2 pages, downloaded Jul. 27, 2015.
Salvat, et al., “Passenger Car Serial Application of a Particulate Filter System on a Common Rail Direct Injection Engine,” SAE Paper No. 2000-01-0473, 14 pages, Feb. 2000.
Santin et al., “Combined Gradient/Newton Projection Semi-Explicit QP Solver for Problems with Bound Constraints,” 2 pages, prior to Jan. 29, 2016.
Schauffele et al., “Automotive Software Engineering Principles, Processes, Methods, and Tools,” SAE International, 10 pages, 2005.
Schilling et al., “A Real-Time Model for the Prediction of the NOx Emissions in DI Diesel Engines,” Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, pp. 2042-2047, Oct. 4-7, 2006.
Schilling, “Model-Based Detection and Isolation of Faults in the Air and Fuel Paths of Common-Rail DI Diesel Engines Equipped with a Lambda and a Nitrogen Oxides Sensor,” Doctor of Sciences Dissertation, 210 pages, 2008.
Shahzad et al., “Preconditioners for Inexact Interior Point Methods for Predictive Control,” 2010 American Control Conference, pp. 5714-5719, Jun. 30-Jul. 2010.
Shamma, et al. “Approximate Set-Valued Observers for Nonlinear Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 42, No. 5, May 1997.
Signer et al., “European Programme on Emissions, Fuels and Engine Technologies (EPEFE)—Heavy Duty Diesel Study,” International Spring Fuels and Lubricants Meeting, SAE 961074, May 6-8, 1996.
Soltis, “Current Status of NOx Sensor Development,” Workshop on Sensor Needs and Requirements for PEM Fuel Cell Systems and Direct-Injection Engines, 9 pages, Jan. 25-26, 2000.
Stefanopoulou, et al., “Control of Variable Geometry Turbocharged Diesel Engines for Reduced Emissions,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 733-745, Jul. 2000.
Stewart et al., “A Model Predictive Control Framework for Industrial Turbodiesel Engine Control,” Proceedings of the 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 8 pages, 2008.
Stewart et al., “A Modular Model Predictive Controller for Turbodiesel Problems,” First Workshop on Automotive Model Predictive Control, Schloss Muhldorf, Feldkirchen, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, 3 pages, 2009.
Storset et al., “Air Charge Estimation for Turbocharged Diesel Engines,” vol. 1 Proceedings of the American Control conference, 8 pages, Jun. 28-30, 2000.
Stradling et al., “The Influene of Fuel Properties and Injection Timing on the Exhaust Emissions and Fuel Consumption of an Iveco Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine,” International Spring Fuels and Lubricants Meeting, SAE 971635, May 5-8, 1997.
Takacs et al., “Newton-Raphson Based Efficient Model Predictive Control Applied on Active Vibrating Structures,” Proceeding of the European Control Conference 2009, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 2845-2850, Aug. 23-26, 2009.
The MathWorks, “Model-Based Calibration Toolbox 2.1 Calibrate complex powertrain systems,” 4 pages, prior to Feb. 2, 2005.
The MathWorks, “Model-Based Calibration Toolbox 2.1.2,” 2 pages, prior to Feb. 2, 2005.
Theiss, “Advanced Reciprocating Engine System (ARES) Activities at the Oak Ridge National Lab (ORNL), Oak Ridge National Laboratory,” U.S. Department of Energy, 13 pages, Apr. 14, 2004.
Tondel et al., “An Algorithm for Multi-Parametric Quadratic Programming and Explicit MPC Solutions,” Automatica, 39, pp. 489-497, 2003.
Traver et al., “A Neural Network-Based Virtual NOx Sensor for Diesel Engines,” 7 pages, prior to Jan. 29, 2016.
Tschanz et al., “Cascaded Multivariable Control of the Combustion in Diesel Engines,” The International Federation of Automatic Control (IFAC), 2012 Workshop on Engine and Powertrain Control, Simulation and Modeling, pp. 25-32, Oct. 23-25, 2012.
Tschanz et al., “Control of Diesel Engines Using NOx-Emission Feedback,” International Journal of Engine Research, vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 45-56, 2013.
Tschanz et al., “Feedback Control of Particulate Matter and Nitrogen Oxide Emissions in Diesel Engines,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 21, pp. 1809-1820, 2013.
Turner, “Automotive Sensors, Sensor Technology Series,” Momentum Press, Unable to Obtain the Entire Book, the Front and Back Covers and Table of Contents are Provided, 2009.
Van Basshuysen et al., “Lexikon Motorentechnik,” (Dictionary of Automotive Technology) published by Vieweg Verlag, Wiesbaden 039936, p. 518, 2004. (English Translation).
Van Den Boom et al., “MPC for Max-Plus-Linear Systems: Closed-Loop Behavior and Tuning,” Proceedings of the 2001 American Control Conference, Arlington, Va, pp. 325-330, Jun. 2001.
Van Heiden et al., “Optimization of Urea SCR deNOx Systems for HD Diesel Engines,” SAE International 2004-01-0154, 13 pages, 2004.
Van Keulen et al., “Predictive Cruise Control in Hybrid Electric Vehicles,” World Electric Vehicle Journal vol. 3, ISSN 2032-6653, pp. 1-11, 2009.
Vdo, “UniNOx-Sensor Specification,” Continental Trading GmbH, 2 pages, Aug. 2007.
Vereschaga et al., “Piecewise Affine Modeling of NOx Emission Produced by a Diesel Engine,” 2013 European Control Conference (ECC), pp. 2000-2005, Jul. 17-19, 2013.
Wahlstrom et al., “Modelling Diesel Engines with a Variable-Geometry Turbocharger and Exhaust Gas Recirculation by Optimization of Model Parameters for Capturing Non-Linear System Dynamics,” (Original Publication) Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D, Journal of Automobile Engineering, vol. 225, No. 7, 28 pages, 2011.
Wang et al., “Fast Model Predictive Control Using Online Optimization,” Proceedings of the 17th World Congress, the International Federation of Automatic Control, Seoul, Korea, pp. 6974-6979, Jul. 6-11, 2008.
Wang et al., “PSO-Based Model Predictive Control for Nonlinear Processes,” Advances in Natural Computation, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3611/2005, 8 pages, 2005.
Wang et al., “Sensing Exhaust NO2 Emissions Using the Mixed Potential Principal,” SAE 2014-01-1487, 7 pages, Apr. 1, 2014.
Wilhelmsson et al., “A Fast Physical NOx Model Implemented on an Embedded System,” Proceedings of the IFAC Workshop on Engine and Powertrain Control, Simulation and Modeling, pp. 207-215, Nov. 30-Dec. 2, 2009.
Wilhemsson et al., “A Physical Two-Zone NOx Model Intended for Embedded Implementation,” SAE 2009-01-1509, 11 pages, 2009.
Winkler et al., “Incorporating Physical Knowledge About the Formation of Nitric Oxides into Evolutionary System Identification,” Proceedings of the 20th European Modeling and Simulation Symposium (EMSS), 6 pages, 2008.
Winkler et al., “On-Line Modeling Based on Genetic Programming,” 12 pages, International Journal on Intelligent Systems Technologies and Applications 2, 2007.
Winkler et al., “Using Genetic Programming in Nonlinear Model Identification,” 99 pages, prior to Jan. 29, 2016.
Winkler et al., “Virtual Sensors for Emissions of a Diesel Engine Produced by Evolutionary System Identification,” LNCS, vol. 5717, 8 pages, 2009.
Wong, “CARB Heavy-Duty OBD Update,” California Air Resources Board, SAE OBD TOPTEC, Downloaded from http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/obdprog/hdobdreg.htm, 72 pages, Sep. 15, 2005.
Wright, “Applying New Optimization Algorithms to Model Predictive Control,” 5th International Conference on Chemical Process Control, 10 pages, 1997.
Yao et al., “The Use of Tunnel Concentration Profile Data to Determine the Ratio of NO2/NOx Directly Emitted from Vehicles,” HAL Archives, 19 pages, 2005.
Zavala et al., “The Advance-Step NMPC Controller: Optimality, Stability, and Robustness,” Automatica, vol. 45, pp. 86-93, 2009.
Zeilinger et al., “Real-Time MPC—Stability Through Robust MPC Design,” Joint 48th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and 28th Chinese Control Conference, Shanghai, P.R. China, pp. 3980-3986, Dec. 16-18, 2009.
Zeldovich, “The Oxidation of Nitrogen in Combustion and Explosions,” ACTA Physiochimica U.R.S.S., vol. XX1, No. 4, 53 pages, 1946.
Zelenka, et al., “An Active Regeneration as a Key Element for Safe Particulate Trap Use,” SAE Paper No. 2001-0103199, 13 pages, Feb. 2001.
Zhu, “Constrained Nonlinear Model Predictive Control for Vehicle Regulation,” Dissertation, Graduate School of the Ohio State University, 125 pages, 2008.
Zhuiykov et al., “Development of Zirconia-Based Potentiometric NOx Sensors for Automotive and Energy Industries in the Early 21st Century: What are the Prospects for Sensors?”, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 121, pp. 639-651, 2007.
Desantes et al., “Development of NOx Fast Estimate Using NOx Sensor,” EAEC 2011 Congress, 2011. Unable to Obtain a Copy of This Reference.
Andersson et al., “Fast Physical NOx Prediction in Diesel Engines, The Diesel Engine: The Low CO2 and Emissions Reduction Challenge,” Conference Proceedings, Lyon, 2006. Unable to Obtain a Copy of This Reference.
Winkler, “Evolutionary System Identification—Modern Approaches and Practical Applications,” Kepler Universitat Linz, Reihe C: Technik and Naturwissenschaften, Universitatsverlag Rudolf Trauner, 2009. Unable to Obtain a Copy of This Reference.
Smith, “Demonstration of a Fast Response On-Board NOx Sensor for Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicles,” Technical report, Southwest Research Institute Engine and Vehicle Research Division SwRI Project No. 03-02256 Contract No. 98-302, 2000. Unable to Obtain a Copy of This Reference.
“J1979 E/E Diagnostic Test Modules,” Proposed Regulation, Vehicle E.E. System Diagnostic Standards Committee, 1 page, Sep. 28, 2010.
“MicroZed Zynq Evaluation and Development and System on Module, Hardware User Guide,” Avnet Electronics Marketing, Version 1.6, Jan. 22, 2015.
Actron, “Elite AutoScanner Kit—Enhanced OBD I & II Scan Tool, OBD 1300,” Downloaded from https://actron.com/content/elite-autoscanner-kit-enhanced-obd-i-and-obd-ii-scan-tool?utm_ . . . , 5 pages, printed Sep. 27, 2016.
Blue Streak Electronics Inc., “Ford Modules,” 1 page, May 12, 2010.
Goodwin, “Researchers Hack a Corvette's Brakes via Insurance Black Box,” Downloaded from http://www.cnet.com/roadshow/news/researchers-hack-a-corvettes-brakes-via-insurance-black-box/, 2 pages, Aug. 2015.
Greenberg, “Hackers Remotely Kill a Jeep on the Highway—With Me in It,” Downloaded from http://www.wired.com/2015/07/hackers-remotely-kill-jeep-highway/, 24 pages, Jul. 21, 2015.
Hammacher Schlemmer, “The Windshield Heads Up Display,” Catalog, p. 47, prior to Apr. 26, 2016.
https://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public-key_cryptography, “Public-Key Cryptography,” 14 pages, printed Feb. 26, 2016.
Zaman, “Lincoln Motor Company: Case study 2015 Lincoln MKC,” Automotive Electronic Design Fundamentals, Chapter 6, 2015.
“Aftertreatment Modeling of RCCI Engine During Transient Operation,” University of Wisconsin—Engine Research Center, 1 page, May 31, 2014.
“Chapter 14: Pollutant Formation,” Fluent Manual, Release 15.0, Chapter 14, pp. 313-345, prior to Jan. 29, 2016.
“Chapter 21, Modeling Pollutant Formation,” Fluent Manual, Release 12.0, Chapter 21, pp. 21-1-21-54, Jan. 30, 2009.
“Model Predictive Control Toolbox Release Notes,” The Mathworks, 24 pages, Oct. 2008.
“Model Predictive Control,” Wikipedia, pp. 1-5, Jan. 22, 2009. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php/title=Special:Book&bookcmd=download&collecton_id=641cd1b5da77cc22&writer=rl&retum_to=Model predictive control, retrieved Nov. 20, 2012.
“MPC Implementation Methods for the Optimization of the Response of Control Valves to Reduce Variability,” Advanced Application Note 002, Rev.A, 10 pages, 2007.
“SCR, 400-csi Coated Catalyst,” Leading NOx Control Technologies Status Summary, 1 page prior to Feb. 2, 2005.
Advanced Petroleum-Based Fuels-Diesel Emissions Control (APBF-DEC) Project, “Quarterly Update,” No. 7, 6 pages, Fall 2002.
Allanson, et al., “Optimizing the Low Temperature Performance and Regeneration Efficiency of the Continuously Regenerating Diesel Particulate Filter System,” SAE Paper No. 2002-01-0428, 8 pages, Mar. 2002.
Amstuz, et al., “EGO Sensor Based Robust Output Control of EGR in Diesel Engines,” IEEE TCST, vol. 3, No. 1, 12 pages, Mar. 1995.
Andersson et al., “A Predictive Real Time NOx Model for Conventional and Partially Premixed Diesel Combustion,” SAE International 2006-01-3329, 10 pages, 2006.
Andersson et al., “A Real Time NOx Model for Conventional and Partially Premixed Diesel Combustion,” SAE Technical Paper Series 2006-01-0195, 2006 SAE World Congress, 13 pages, Apr. 3-6, 2006.
Arregle et al., “On Board NOx Prediction in Diesel Engines: A Physical Approach,” Automotive Model Predictive Control, Models Methods and Applications, Chapter 2, 14 pages, 2010.
Asprion, “Optimal Control of Diesel Engines,” PHD Thesis, Diss ETH No. 21593, 436 pages, 2013.
Assanis et al., “A Predictive Ignition Delay Correlation Under Steady-State and Transient Operation of a Direct Injection Diesel Engine,” ASME, Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, vol. 125, pp. 450-457, Apr. 2003.
Axehill et al., “A Dual Gradiant Projection Quadratic Programming Algorithm Tailored for Model Predictive Control,” Proceedings of the 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Cancun Mexico, pp. 3057-3064, Dec. 9-11, 2008.
Axehill et al., “A Dual Gradient Projection Quadratic Programming Algorithm Tailored for Mixed Integer Predictive Control,” Technical Report from Linkopings Universitet, Report No. Li—Th—ISY-R-2833, 58 pages, Jan. 31, 2008.
Baffi et al., “Non-Linear Model Based Predictive Control Through Dynamic Non-Linear Partial Least Squares,” Trans IChemE, vol. 80, Part A, pp. 75-86, Jan. 2002.
Bako et al., “A Recursive Identification Algorithm for Switched Linear/Affine Models,” Nonlinear Analysis: Hybrid Systems, vol. 5, pp. 242-253, 2011.
Barba et al., “A Phenomenological Combustion Model for Heat Release Rate Prediction in High-Speed DI Diesel Engines with Common Rail Injection,” SAE Technical Paper Series 2000-01-2933, International Fall Fuels and Lubricants Meeting Exposition, 15 pages, Oct. 16-19, 2000.
Bemporad et al., “Model Predictive Control Toolbox 3, User's Guide,” Matlab Mathworks, 282 pages, 2008.
Bemporad et al., “The Explicit Linear Quadratic Regulator for Constrained Systems,” Automatica, 38, pp. 3-20, 2002.
Bemporad, “Model Predictive Control Based on Linear Programming—The Explicit Solution,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 47, No. 12, pp. 1974-1984, Dec. 2002.
Bemporad, “Model Predictive Control Design: New Trends and Tools,” Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision & Control, pp. 6678-6683, Dec. 13-15, 2006.
Bemporad, et al., “Explicit Model Predictive Control,” 1 page, prior to Feb. 2, 2005.
Bertsekas, “On the Goldstein-Levitin-Polyak Gradient Projection Method,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. AC-21, No. 2, pp. 174-184, Apr. 1976.
Bertsekas, “Projected Newton Methods for Optimization Problems with Simple Constraints*,” SIAM J. Control and Optimization, vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 221-246, Mar. 1982.
Blanco-Rodriguez, “Modelling and Observation of Exhaust Gas Concentrations for Diesel Engine Control,” Phd Dissertation, 242 pages, Sep. 2013.
Borrelli et al., “An MPC/Hybrid System Approach to Traction Control,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 541-553, May 2006.
Borrelli, “Constrained Optimal Control of Linear and Hybrid Systems,” Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol. 290, 2003.
Borrelli, “Discrete Time Constrained Optimal Control,” A Dissertation Submitted to the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Diss. ETH No. 14666, 232 pages, Oct. 9, 2002.
Bourn et al., “Advanced Compressor Engine Controls to Enhance Operation, Reliability and Integrity,” Southwest Research Institute, DOE Award No. DE-FC26-03NT41859, SwRI Project No. 03.10198, 60 pages, Mar. 2004.
Catalytica Energy Systems, “Innovative NOx Reduction Solutions for Diesel Engines,” 13 pages, 3rd Quarter, 2003.
Charalampidis et al., “Computationally Efficient Kalman Filtering for a Class of Nonlinear Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 56, No. 3, pp. 483-491, Mar. 2011.
Chatterjee, et al. “Catalytic Emission Control for Heavy Duty Diesel Engines,” JM, 46 pages, prior to Feb. 2, 2005.
Chew, “Sensor Validation Scheme with Virtual NOx Sensing for Heavy Duty Diesel Engines,” Master's Thesis, 144 pages, 2007.
European Search Report for EP Application No. 11167549.2 dated Nov. 27, 2012.
European Search Report for EP Application No. 12191156.4-1603 dated Feb. 9, 2015.
European Search Report for EP Application No. EP 10175270.7-2302419 dated Jan. 16, 2013.
European Search Report for EP Application No. EP 15152957.5-1807 dated Feb. 10, 2015.
The Extended European Search Report for EP Application No. 15155295.7-1606, dated Aug. 4, 2015.
The Extended European Search Report for EP Application No. 15179435.1, dated Apr. 1, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/011,445, filed Jan. 29, 2016.
De Oliveira, “Constraint Handling and Stability Properties of Model Predictive Control,” Carnegie Institute of Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering, Paper 197, 64 pages, Jan. 1, 1993.
De Schutter et al., “Model Predictive Control for Max-Min-Plus-Scaling Systems,” Proceedings of the 2001 American Control Conference, Arlington, Va, pp. 319-324, Jun. 2001.
Extended European Search Report for EP Application No. 17163452.0, dated Sep. 26, 2017.
Extended European Search Report for EP Application No. 17151521.6, dated Oct. 23, 2017.
Greenberg, “Hackers Cut a Corvette's Brakes Via A Common Car Gadget,” downloaded from https://www.wired.com2015/08/hackers-cut-corvettes-brakes-v..., 14 pages, Aug. 11, 2015, printed Dec. 11, 2017.
http://www.blackpoolc,ommunications.com/products/alarm-immo..., “OBD Security OBD Port Protection—Alarms & Immobilizers . . .,” 1 page, printed Jun. 5, 2017.
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/09/20/chinese-company-hacks-tesla-car-remotely.html, “Chinese Company Hacks Tesla Car Remotely,” 3 pages, Sep. 20, 2016.
ISO, “ISO Document No. 13185-2:2015(E),” 3 pages, 2015.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170306871 A1 Oct 2017 US