1. Field of the Invention
The field of the invention relates to microelectromechanical systems (MEMS), and more particularly, to electrical connection architectures for arrays of MEMS elements.
2. Description of the Related Technology
Microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) include micromechanical elements, actuators, and electronics. Micromechanical elements may be created using deposition, etching, and or other micromachining processes that etch away parts of substrates and/or deposited material layers or that add layers to form electrical and electromechanical devices. One type of MEMS device is called an interferometric modulator. An interferometric modulator may comprise a pair of conductive plates, one or both of which may be partially transparent and capable of relative motion upon application of an appropriate electrical signal. One plate may comprise a stationary layer deposited on a substrate, the other plate may comprise a metallic membrane suspended over the stationary layer.
Arrays of independently actuatable interferometric light modulators are used in certain display configurations as display elements. The light modulators are electrically connected so as to provide the control voltages or signals used to individually actuate each light modulator.
The system, method, and devices of the invention each have several aspects, no single one of which is solely responsible for its desirable attributes. Without limiting the scope of this invention, its more prominent features will now be discussed briefly. After considering this discussion, and particularly after reading the section entitled “Detailed Description of Certain Embodiments” one will understand how the features of this invention provide advantages over other display devices.
In certain embodiments, a light modulator comprises a substrate, a first electrode layer over the substrate, and a second electrode layer over the substrate. The light modulator further comprises a reflective surface substantially parallel to the first electrode layer and coupled to the second electrode layer. The reflective surface is movable along a direction substantially perpendicular to the reflective surface between a first position and a second position. The first position is a first distance from the first electrode layer and the second position is a second distance from the first electrode layer. The light modulator further comprises a conductive bus layer of which at least a portion is electrically coupled to at least one of the first electrode layer and the second electrode layer. The reflective surface moves between the first position and the second position in response to a voltage applied to the conductive bus layer.
In certain embodiments, a method controls a light modulator. The method comprises providing a substrate and providing a first electrode layer over the substrate. The method further comprises providing a second electrode layer over the substrate and providing a reflective surface that is substantially parallel to the first electrode layer and coupled to the second electrode layer. The reflective surface is movable along a direction substantially perpendicular to the reflective surface between a first position and a second position. The first position is a first distance from the first electrode layer and the second position is a second distance from the first electrode layer. The method further comprises applying a voltage to a conductive bus layer, wherein at least a portion of the conductive bus layer is electrically coupled to at least one of the first electrode layer and the second electrode layer. The method further comprises moving the reflective surface between the first position and the second position in response to the applied voltage.
An exemplary embodiment of an interferometric light modulator comprises a substrate, a first electrode layer over the substrate, a second electrode layer over the substrate, and a conductive bus layer. At least a portion of the conductive bus layer is electrically coupled to at least one of the first electrode layer and the second electrode layer. The reflective surface moves between the first position and the second position in response to a voltage applied to the conductive bus layer. The conductive bus layer provides an electrical path that has significantly lower electrical resistance than configurations which electrically connect columns of interferometric modulators only through the first electrode layer or connect rows of interferometric modulators only through the second electrode layer.
The following detailed description is directed to certain specific embodiments of the invention. However, the invention can be embodied in a multitude of different ways. In this description, reference is made to the drawings wherein like parts are designated with like numerals throughout. As will be apparent from the following description, the invention may be implemented in any device that is configured to display an image, whether in motion (e.g., video) or stationary (e.g., still image), and whether textual or pictorial. More particularly, it is contemplated that the invention may be implemented in or associated with a variety of electronic devices such as, but not limited to, mobile telephones, wireless devices, personal data assistants (PDAs), hand-held or portable computers, GPS receivers/navigators, cameras, MP3 players, camcorders, game consoles, wrist watches, clocks, calculators, television monitors, flat panel displays, computer monitors, auto displays (e.g., odometer display, etc.), cockpit controls and/or displays, display of camera views (e.g., display of a rear view camera in a vehicle), electronic photographs, electronic billboards or signs, projectors, architectural structures, packaging, and aesthetic structures (e.g., display of images on a piece of jewelry). MEMS devices of similar structure to those described herein can also be used in non-display applications such as in electronic switching devices.
One interferometric modulator display embodiment comprising an interferometric MEMS display element is illustrated in
The depicted portion of the pixel array in
The fixed layers 16a, 16b are electrically conductive, partially transparent and partially reflective, and may be fabricated, for example, by depositing one or more layers each of chromium and indium-tin-oxide onto a transparent substrate 20. The layers are patterned into parallel strips, and may form row electrodes in a display device as described further below. The movable layers 14a, 14b may be formed as a series of parallel strips of a deposited metal layer or layers (orthogonal to the row electrodes 16a, 16b) deposited on top of posts 18 and an intervening sacrificial material deposited between the posts 18. When the sacrificial material is etched away, the deformable metal layers are separated from the fixed metal layers by a defined air gap 19. A highly conductive and reflective material such as aluminum may be used for the deformable layers, and these strips may form column electrodes in a display device.
With no applied voltage, the cavity 19 remains between the layers 14a, 16a and the deformable layer is in a mechanically relaxed state as illustrated by the pixel 12a in
In one embodiment, the processor 21 is also configured to communicate with an array controller 22. In one embodiment, the array controller 22 includes a row driver circuit 24 and a column driver circuit 26 that provide signals to a pixel array 30. The cross section of the array illustrated in
In typical applications, a display frame may be created by asserting the set of column electrodes in accordance with the desired set of actuated pixels in the first row. A row pulse is then applied to the row 1 electrode, actuating the pixels corresponding to the asserted column lines. The asserted set of column electrodes is then changed to correspond to the desired set of actuated pixels in the second row. A pulse is then applied to the row 2 electrode, actuating the appropriate pixels in row 2 in accordance with the asserted column electrodes. The row 1 pixels are unaffected by the row 2 pulse, and remain in the state they were set to during the row 1 pulse. This may be repeated for the entire series of rows in a sequential fashion to produce the frame. Generally, the frames are refreshed and/or updated with new display data by continually repeating this process at some desired number of frames per second. A wide variety of protocols for driving row and column electrodes of pixel arrays to produce display frames are also well known and may be used in conjunction with the present invention.
In the
The details of the structure of interferometric modulators that operate in accordance with the principles set forth above may vary widely. For example,
The response time for discharging and charging an interferometric modulator is dependent in part on an RC (resistance-capacitance) time constant for the voltage circuit connected to the interferometric modulator. This response time of the interferometric modulator has an effect on the display quality of the interferometric modulator array. When the time between incoming scan pulses received by a given interferometric modulator is shorter than the response time of the interferometric modulator, the moving layer is unable to synchronize with the incoming scan pulses. Under such conditions, the state of the interferometric modulator does not respond to each and every scan pulse, thereby resulting in a degraded displayed image. It is therefore desirable to provide an interferometric modulator with a reduced response time to allow for faster scan and refresh rates.
The voltage circuit connected to an interferometric modulator comprises the electrodes of the interferometric modulator, as well as the contacts, conductors, and other conductive elements which provide electrical connections between the electrodes and the row/column driver electronics. In certain embodiments, the materials and geometries of the electrodes of the interferometic modulator impact the RC time constant for the voltage circuit. In certain array configurations, the electrodes of adjacent interferometric modulators are coupled together in series to connect adjacent interferometric modulators with the driver electronics, resulting in higher RC time constants. For other array configurations, wires or other electrical connectors may be utilized for the electrical connections between the row and column drivers and the electrodes of the interferometric modulators, with these wires contributing to the RC time constants of the interferometric modulators.
In certain embodiments, as shown in
In certain embodiments, the second electrode layer 1302 of each modulator comprises at least a portion of the moving layer above the first electrode layer 902. In the embodiment schematically illustrated by
In certain embodiments, as schematically illustrated by
In certain embodiments, each modulator of the array further comprises a conductive bus layer. At least a portion of the conductive bus layer is electrically coupled to at least one of the first electrode layer 902 and the second electrode layer 1302. The reflective surface 901 moves between the first position and the second position in response to a voltage applied to the conductive bus layer.
The conductive bus layer 600 of certain embodiments comprises a conductive material, including but not limited to, metals, composites, and alloys. Exemplary conductive materials for the conductive bus layer 600 include, but are not limited to, titanium, chromium, nickel, and aluminum. In certain embodiments, the thickness of the conductive bus layer 600 is in a range between approximately 0.1 micron and approximately 2 microns measured in a direction that is parallel to the direction 903 in
In certain embodiments, as shown in
In the exemplary embodiment illustrated in
Advantageously, for the embodiments schematically illustrated by
The conductive bus layer 600 of certain embodiments is positioned at various locations relative to the other portions of the display of interferometric modulators. In certain embodiments, as schematically illustrated by
In certain embodiments, each conductive bar provides electrical connections between a column driver and the second electrode layers 1302 of the corresponding column of modulators. In certain embodiments, each conductive bus layer 800 is electrically connected to the corresponding second electrode layers 1302 at one or more locations. As illustrated in
The conductive bus layer 900 of certain such embodiments electrically connects a row driver and the first electrode layers 902 of a corresponding row of interferometric modulators. The row driver selectively applies voltages through the conductive bus layer 900 to the first electrode layers 902 of the interferometric modulators of a row of the display. The conductive bus layer 900 provides an electrical path that has significantly lower electrical resistance than configurations which electrically connect rows of interferometric modulators only through the first electrode layers 902.
The material for the conductive bus layer 1000 is selected to enhance the conductivity across the first electrode layers 902. In certain embodiments, the conductive bus layer 1000 comprises aluminum or other conductive material. Unlike the first electrode layers 902 of certain embodiments, the material selected for the conductive bus layer 1000 may be opaque. In certain embodiments, the conductive bus layer 1000 has a width in a range between approximately 4 microns and approximately 10 microns measured in a direction that is perpendicular to the direction 903 in
In certain embodiments, a dielectric layer 906 is located between the conductive bus layer 1000 and the reflective surface layers 901. The dielectric layer 906 of certain such embodiments advantageously prevents contact between the conductive bus layer 1000 and the reflective surface layer 901 of the interferometric modulator.
In certain embodiments, locating the conductive bus layer 1000 below the reflective surface layer 901 may adversely impact the optical performance of the interferometric modulator by blocking at least a portion of the incoming and reflected light of the interferometric modulator. To reduce the visual impact of the conductive bus layer 1000 on the optical performance of the interferometric modulator, conductive bus layers 1000 with smaller widths measured in a direction that is perpendicular to the direction 903 in
In
In certain embodiments, the lower resistance path provided by the conductive bus layers advantageously reduces the RC time constant of the circuit. Exemplary RC times for a plurality of interferometric modulators having their first electrode layers 902 electrically coupled in series can range from 5 microseconds to 100 microseconds, depending on the number of interferometric modulators. This same plurality of interferometric modulators may have a resistance of as high as 30-50 ohms/square. The use of the conductive bus layers to electrically connect row and column drivers to the corresponding first electrode layers 902 and second electrode layers 1302 of the plurality of interferometric modulators can reduce the electrical resistance of the circuit, thereby reducing the RC time constant.
Method of Manufacture Conductive Bus Over the Mechanical Layer
An exemplary series of processing steps for forming a conductive bus structure located above a second electrode layer 1302 is schematically illustrated in
A dielectric (e.g., silicon oxide) layer 906 is formed over the metal layer 904, the first electrode layer 902, and the oxide layer 1802, as illustrated in
For example, in certain embodiments, a first sacrificial layer is deposited, masked and patterned, with the first sacrificial layer defining the area of a first modulator. A second sacrificial layer is then be deposited and patterned to define the combined area of the first modulator defined above and a second modulator. The combined thicknesses of the first sacrificial layer and the second sacrificial layer in the area of the first interferometric modulator is larger than the thickness of the second sacrificial layer in the area of the second interferometric modulator. Subsequently, in certain embodiments, a third sacrificial layer is formed over the second sacrificial layer defining the combined area of the first, second, and third interferometric modulator for each set of colored interferometric modulators. This third sacrificial layer need not be patterned in certain embodiments, since its thickness will be included in all three of the modulators of the set of colored interferometric modulators.
The three individual sacrificial layers described here may be of different thicknesses. In this way, the first modulator of the set of colored interferometric modulators would have a cavity depth equal to the combined thicknesses of the three sacrificial layers. The second modulator of the set of colored interferometric modulators would have a cavity depth equal to the combined thicknesses of two of the three sacrificial layers. The third modulator of the set of colored interferometric modulators would have a cavity depth equal to the thickness of one of the three sacrificial layers. When the sacrificial layers are removed, the cavity dimensions will vary according to the various combined thicknesses of the three sacrificial layers, resulting in three different colors such as red, green and blue.
In
In
In
In
Alone, or in combination with the features described above, the capacitance of the interferometric modulators can be reduced. Reducing the capacitance of the circuit reduces the RC time constant.
Refresh Rate
The time required to charge and discharge or change the applied voltage across the first electrode layer 902 and the second electrode layer 1302 affects the refresh rate of the display. For example, a decrease in the reaction time of the second electrode layer 1302 to changes in the applied voltage allows the display to refresh in less time. A faster refreshing display can provide a less noticeable transition between subsequent frames.
Image Resolution
In certain embodiments, the use of a conductive bus structure comprising complex routing lines along the backside of an array of interferometric modulators improves gray scale display techniques. Techniques for displaying a gray scale image include the subdividing of pixels into a plurality of interferometric modules or smaller sub-pixels. By having more sub-pixels in each pixel, deeper grayscales can be achieved. However, increasing the number of sub-pixels increases the complexity of the required routing to the row and column drivers located at the perimeter of the display array.
In certain embodiments, the use of a conductive bus structure improves the gray scale display. In temporal modulation, each interferometric modulator of a grayscale image is pulsed or rapidly refreshed so that the viewer perceives the display to be exhibiting variations in intensity level. In certain embodiments, the refresh or modulation rate of the interferometric modulator is increased with the incorporation of one or more of the modifications described above. The refresh rate can be calculated by the following calculation:
T_line=T—rc+T_interferometric modulator
where T_line is the time to update 1 line;
T_rc is the RC time for the line;
T_interferometric modulator is the mechanical response time of the interferometric modulator.
Then:
T_refresh=n_rows×T_line
where T_refresh is the time it takes to update the entire screen;
n_rows is the number of rows on the display
Then:
Screen Refresh Rate=1/T_refresh
where Screen Refresh Rate is the update rate of the entire display, typically in Hz.
Thus, as T_rc is decreased with the use of the conductive bus, T_line decreases and T_refresh decreases. As T_refresh decreases, the Screen Refresh Rate increases and enhances temporal modulation.
Referring back to
The thickness of the first electrode layer 902 may vary. In certain embodiments, the thickness may be between 300 angstroms and 2,000 angstroms measured in a direction that is parallel to the direction 903 in
A material with a low dielectric constant can be selected for the oxide layer or dielectric material 906 that separates the first electrode layer 902 from the second electrode layer 1302. The dielectric electrically insulates the second electrode layer 1302 from the first electrode layer 902 allowing a charge or voltage to be stored between the first and second electrode layers. The dielectric layer 906 further allows the voltage or charge to form an electro-static force that acts upon the second electrode layer 1302. A material having a low dielectric constant advantageously reduces the RC time constant of the electrical circuit. For example, a low dielectric constant (K) material can have a lower dielectric constant than a dielectric made from silicon dioxide (3.8). In certain embodiments, the dielectric constant of the dielectric layer 906 is as low as 2.0.
Reduce Capacitance
Different and additional materials can be added to reduce the capacitance of the electrical circuit. In certain embodiments, the material selected for the dielectric layer 906 can reduce the capacitance of the electrical circuit. These materials include spun-on-glass, SiN, SiO2, AlO2, and composites of one or more of these materials.
In certain embodiments, a second dielectric layer 104 is provided between the metal layer 904 and the first electrode layer 902. In certain embodiments, as illustrated in
In certain embodiments of interferometric modulators, the reduction in capacitance due to the addition of the second dielectric layer 104 is a function of the thicknesses of the dielectric layer 906 and the second dielectric layer 104 when the reflective surface 901 is in the ‘near’ position. In certain embodiments, the two dielectric layers 906, 104 comprise the same material, while in other embodiments, the two dielectric layers comprise different materials. The capacitance of an interferometric modulator can be approximated by the equation below when the dielectric layer 906 and the second dielectric layer 104 are the same material.
Capacitance˜(Area of the reflective surface 901)×(Dielectric Constant)×(Permittivity Constant)/(Thickness of Top Dielectric 906+Thickness of Bottom Dielectric 104).
In certain embodiments, the thickness of the dielectric layer 906 may vary. As illustrated in
In certain embodiments, only the peripheral portion contributes to the electrically active area of the first electrode layer 902. In certain such embodiments, the peripheral portions are electrically connected to a conductive bus structure. In certain other embodiments, only the center portion contributes to the electrically active area of the first electrode layer 902. In certain such embodiments, the center portions are electrically connected to a conductive bus structure.
Reduce Power Consumption
An additional benefit of reducing the resistance or capacitance of the circuit is a reduction in power consumption. For example, to charge and discharge an array of interferometric modulators, the column and row drivers require power to charge and discharge the interferometric modulators. By reducing the capacitance of the individual interferometric modulators, the row and column drivers can apply a lower voltage when activating each interferometric modulator. In certain embodiments, a reduction in the activation voltage is achieved by changing the mechanical stiffness of the interferometric module and/or affecting the strength of the electrostatic force within the interferometric modulator.
For example, geometric changes of the interferometric module can reduce the mechanical stiffness of the second electrode layer 1302. Exemplary geometric changes include increasing the spacing between adjacent support posts 202 or changing the shape of the second electrode layer 1302. In certain embodiments, increasing the nominal spacing between support posts 202 increases the flexibility of the second electrode layer 1302 attached thereto. This increase in flexibility allows the second electrode layer 1302 and the reflective surface 901 to change states in response to the column or row driver applying a lower activation voltage.
In certain embodiments, as shown in
The selection of the material for the second electrode layer 1302 can affect the activation voltage. Selecting a more compliant material increases the flexibility of the second electrode layer 1302. In this way, in certain embodiments, the row and column drivers apply a lower activation voltage and still achieve the desired reflective surface layer displacement. In certain embodiments, the second electrode layer 1302 comprises a more compliant material such as aluminum to allow the reflective surface layer 901 to respond to a lower activation voltage than does a second electrode layer 1302 comprising nickel. Other exemplary materials that could be used for the second electrode layer 1302 include, but are not limited to, Cr, Cu, composites made of oxides and metal (for example, Silicon Nitride encased by aluminum), organic films reinforced by metal (for example, photoresist plated with any of the metal examples). The mechanical stiffness of the second electrode layer 1302 can be further decreased by reducing the thickness of the second electrode layer 1302. In certain embodiments, the second electrode layer 1302 has a thickness of about 500 angstroms.
Another technique in certain embodiments for reducing the activation voltage is to change the strength of the electric field created between the first electrode layer 902 and the second electrode layer 1302. The strength of the electric field is increased by patterning the first electrode layer 902 to reduce the amount of electrically active area. In this way, the area of the interferometric modulator which forms the electrically active portion is reduced. Patterning the electrode by decreasing the electrically active area as illustrated in
The activation voltage can be further reduced in certain embodiments by selecting materials for the one or more dielectric layers 906 that have higher dielectric constants. To first order, the relationship between dielectric constant and actuation voltage is:
V˜1/(K^½).
The voltage is inversely proportional to the square root of the dielectric constant. Thus, as the constant is increased, it takes less voltage to pull the second electrode layer 1302 towards the first electrode layer 902. Materials with higher dielectric constants increase the resulting electrostatic attraction between the first and second electrode layers.
One possible pixel configuration 602 in accordance with certain embodiments is shown in
The three different colors (red, green, and blue) may be achieved in certain embodiments by varying the distance between the mirror and the optical stack. When a voltage is applied to the modulators, they may all move a uniform distance towards the electrode or they may all move different distances toward the electrode. Indeed, all nine modulators may traverse the entire cavity and move to a near position that brings them into direct contact with the substrate 106. The dimensions of the cavities in the quiescent state are shown by the vertical dimensions 1500, 1600 and 1700, in
In one embodiment, the vertical dimensions 1500, 1600, and 1700 are 4000 angstroms, 3000 angstroms, and 2000 angstroms, respectively.
Interferometric modulators are minuscule, typically 25-60 microns on a side (400-1,000 dots per inch). Therefore, in certain embodiments, many interferometric modulators elements can be ganged and driven together as a pixel, or sub-pixel in a monochrome, color, or grayscale display. For example, each interferometer modulator can correspond to a single display pixel in a monochrome display. For color or grayscale displays, the color or intensity of each interferometric modulator in certain embodiments is determined by the size of the air gap between the optical and mechanical layers. Multiple sub-elements having different intensities or colors form a grayscale or color pixel. To create a flat panel display, a large array of interferometric modulators are fabricated in the desired format (for example, 5″ full color VGA) and packaged.
The reflective surface 901 of modulator 1400(a) in certain embodiments may have back supports, a flex layer and support post interfaces designed to cause the reflective surface 901 to settle at a distance 1500. The reflective surface 901 of modulator 1400(d) in certain embodiments may have back supports, a flex layer, and support post interfaces designed to cause the reflective surface layer to settle at a distance 1600 that is less than distance 1500. Finally, the reflective surface layer 901 of modulator 1400(g) in certain embodiments may have back supports, a flex layer and support post interfaces designed to cause the reflective surface layer to settle at a distance 1700 that is less than the distance 1600. In this way, controlling the mechanical properties and/or the physical restraints of the supports in certain embodiments results in three different cavity dimensions, and thus three different pixel colors are created.
Alternatively, the differing characteristics of the flex layer and supports could be manipulated to cause the reflective surface layer 901 to move different distances upon application of the same voltage. As yet another alternative, the modulators could all have the same structures, but differing voltages applied for differing colors.
While the above detailed description has shown, described, and pointed out novel features of the invention as applied to various embodiments, it will be understood that various omissions, substitutions, and changes in the form and details of the device or process illustrated may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the invention. Methods for incorporating the features described above with the interferometric modulators will be readily apparent to one having ordinary skill in the art. Further, one or more of these features may be adapted to work with any of the embodiments, as well as other configurations of the interferometric modulators. As will be recognized, the present invention may be embodied within a form that does not provide all of the features and benefits set forth herein, as some features may be used or practiced separately from others.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/875,613, filed on Oct. 19, 2007, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/057,045, filed on Feb. 11, 2005 which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/613,372, filed on Sep. 27, 2004, the disclosures of each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2590906 | Tripp | Apr 1952 | A |
| 2677714 | Auwarter | May 1954 | A |
| 3247392 | Thelen | Apr 1966 | A |
| 3296530 | Brooks | Jan 1967 | A |
| 3679313 | Rosenberg | Jul 1972 | A |
| 3728030 | Hawes | Apr 1973 | A |
| 3886310 | Guldberg | May 1975 | A |
| 3955190 | Teraishi | May 1976 | A |
| 4403248 | te Velde | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4421381 | Ueda et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4441789 | Pohlack | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4441791 | Hornbeck | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4497974 | Deckman et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4498953 | Cook et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4518959 | Ueda et al. | May 1985 | A |
| 4560435 | Brown et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4626840 | Glasper et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4655554 | Armitage | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4705361 | Frazier et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4779959 | Saunders | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4786128 | Birnbach | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4822993 | Dillon et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4859060 | Katagiri et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4864290 | Waters | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4925259 | Emmett | May 1990 | A |
| 4954789 | Sampsell | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4956619 | Hornbeck | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4973131 | Carnes | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4980775 | Brody | Dec 1990 | A |
| 5022745 | Zayhowski et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5028939 | Hornbeck et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5062689 | Koehler | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5091983 | Lukosz | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5096279 | Hornbeck et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5170283 | O'Brien et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5206632 | Dupont et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5216537 | Hornbeck | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5285196 | Gale | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5315370 | Bulow | May 1994 | A |
| 5381232 | Van Wijk | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5452138 | Mignardi et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5471341 | Warde et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5500761 | Goossen et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5526172 | Kanack | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5544268 | Bischel et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5550373 | Cole et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5559358 | Burns et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5561523 | Blomberg et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5597736 | Sampsell | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5600383 | Hornbeck | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5636052 | Arney et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5646729 | Koskinen et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5646768 | Kaeriyama | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5661592 | Bornstein et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5665997 | Weaver et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5699074 | Sutherland et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5699181 | Choi | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5710656 | Goossen | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5719068 | Suzawa et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5734177 | Sakamoto | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5771116 | Miller et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5786927 | Greywall | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5808781 | Arney et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5818095 | Sampsell | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5825528 | Goossen | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5838484 | Goossen et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5867302 | Fleming | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5870221 | Goossen | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5914804 | Goossen | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5920418 | Shiono et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5961848 | Jacquet et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5963788 | Barron et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5986796 | Miles | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6028689 | Michalicek et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6031653 | Wang | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6040937 | Miles | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6046659 | Loo et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6055090 | Miles | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6100861 | Cohen et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6115014 | Aoki et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6124851 | Jacobson | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6142358 | Cohn et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6147680 | Tareev | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6242932 | Hembree | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6262697 | Stephenson | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6297811 | Kent et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6301000 | Johnson | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6316289 | Chung | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6323987 | Rinaudo et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6327071 | Kimura | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6335235 | Bhekta et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6351329 | Greywall | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6356378 | Huibers | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6377233 | Colgan et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
| 6381022 | Zavracky | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6384952 | Clark et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6392618 | Kimura et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6400738 | Tucker et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6433917 | Mei et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6437583 | Tartagni et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6438282 | Takeda et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6452712 | Atobe et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
| 6466354 | Gudeman | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6519073 | Goossen | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6556338 | Han et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6574033 | Chui et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6597490 | Tayebati | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6608268 | Goldsmith | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6632698 | Ives | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6650455 | Miles | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6657832 | Williams et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6661561 | Fitzpatrick et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6674562 | Miles et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6680792 | Miles | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6698295 | Sherrer | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6707594 | Holmes | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6710908 | Miles et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6738194 | Ramirez et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6744335 | Ryhanen et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6768555 | Chen et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6791735 | Stappaerts | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6794119 | Miles | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6813059 | Hunter et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6813060 | Garcia et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6836366 | Flanders et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6841081 | Chang et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6844959 | Huibers et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6849471 | Patel et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6862127 | Ishii | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6864882 | Newton | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6867896 | Miles | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6870654 | Lin et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6882458 | Lin et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6882461 | Tsai et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6912022 | Lin et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6913942 | Patel et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6940630 | Xie | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6947200 | Huibers | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6952303 | Lin et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6958847 | Lin | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6960305 | Doan et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6980350 | Hung et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6982820 | Tsai | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7002726 | Patel et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7006272 | Tsai | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7008812 | Carley | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7009754 | Huibers | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7027204 | Trisnadi et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7034981 | Makigaki | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7046422 | Kimura et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7053737 | Schwartz et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7072093 | Piehl et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7075700 | Muenter | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7113339 | Taguchi et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7119945 | Kothari et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7123216 | Miles | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7126738 | Miles | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7126741 | Wagner et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7198973 | Lin et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7221495 | Miles et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7236284 | Miles | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7245285 | Yeh et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7301704 | Miles | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7372619 | Miles | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7439943 | Nakanishi | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7459402 | Doan et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7460291 | Sampsell et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7476327 | Tung et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7508566 | Feenstra et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7532377 | Miles | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7532381 | Miles | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7550794 | Miles et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7554711 | Miles | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7656391 | Kimura et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7672035 | Sampsell et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7692844 | Miles | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7704772 | Tung et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7738157 | Miles | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7808694 | Miles | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7826120 | Miles | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7830586 | Miles | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7830587 | Miles | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7830588 | Miles | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7852544 | Sampsell | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7852545 | Miles | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7872792 | Miles | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7898722 | Miles | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 20010003487 | Miles | Jun 2001 | A1 |
| 20010028503 | Flanders et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010043171 | Van Gorkom et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020024711 | Miles | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020054424 | Miles | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020070931 | Ishikawa | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020075555 | Miles | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020126364 | Miles | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020146200 | Kudrle et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020149828 | Miles et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020149834 | Mei et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020154422 | Sniegowski et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020197761 | Patel et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030011864 | Flanders | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030016428 | Kato et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030035196 | Walker | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030043157 | Miles | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030053078 | Missey et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030119221 | Cunningham et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030123125 | Little | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030138669 | Kojima et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030173504 | Cole et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030202265 | Reboa et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030202266 | Ring et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040008396 | Stappaerts | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040008438 | Sato | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040027671 | Wu et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040027701 | Ishikawa | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040043552 | Strumpell et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040051929 | Sampsell et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040066477 | Morimoto et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040075967 | Lynch et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040076802 | Tompkin et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040080035 | Delapierre | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040100594 | Huibers et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040100677 | Huibers et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040125281 | Lin et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040125282 | Lin et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040145811 | Lin et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040147198 | Lin et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040175577 | Lin et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040184134 | Makigaki | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040188599 | Viktorovitch et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040207897 | Lin | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040209195 | Lin | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040217264 | Wood et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040217919 | Piehl et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040218251 | Piehl et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040259010 | Kanbe | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050001797 | Miller et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050002082 | Miles | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050003667 | Lin et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050024557 | Lin | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050035699 | Tsai | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050036095 | Yeh et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050046919 | Taguchi et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050046922 | Lin et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050046948 | Lin | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050068627 | Nakamura et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050078348 | Lin | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050117190 | Iwauchi et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050117623 | Shchukin et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050122306 | Wilcox et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050128543 | Phillips et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050133761 | Thielemans | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050168849 | Lin | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050179378 | Oooka et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050195462 | Lin | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050239275 | Muthukumar et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050275930 | Patel et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060007517 | Tsai | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060017379 | Su et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060017689 | Faase et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060022966 | Mar | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060038643 | Xu et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060082863 | Piehl et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060220160 | Miles | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20070020948 | Piehl et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070153860 | Chang-Hasnain et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070253054 | Miles | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080088910 | Miles | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080297880 | Steckl et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090174651 | Jacobsen et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20110019380 | Miles | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110026096 | Miles | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110038027 | Miles | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110080632 | Miles | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110170166 | Miles | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110170167 | Miles | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110188110 | Miles | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0 035 299 | Sep 1983 | EP |
| 0 668 490 | Aug 1995 | EP |
| 0 695 959 | Feb 1996 | EP |
| 0 879 991 | Nov 1998 | EP |
| 0 969 306 | Jan 2000 | EP |
| 0 986 077 | Mar 2000 | EP |
| 1 122 577 | Aug 2001 | EP |
| 1 205 782 | May 2002 | EP |
| 1 227 346 | Jul 2002 | EP |
| 1 275 997 | Jan 2003 | EP |
| 1 403 212 | Mar 2004 | EP |
| 1 473 581 | Nov 2004 | EP |
| 1 640 763 | Mar 2006 | EP |
| 56-088111 | Jul 1981 | JP |
| 03-180890 | Aug 1991 | JP |
| 04-276721 | Oct 1992 | JP |
| 5-49238 | Feb 1993 | JP |
| 5-281479 | Oct 1993 | JP |
| 08-051230 | Feb 1996 | JP |
| 11-211999 | Aug 1999 | JP |
| 2000 147262 | May 2000 | JP |
| 2001-221913 | Aug 2001 | JP |
| 2001 249283 | Sep 2001 | JP |
| 2002-062490 | Feb 2002 | JP |
| 2002-221678 | Aug 2002 | JP |
| 2003-340795 | Feb 2003 | JP |
| 2003 177336 | Jun 2003 | JP |
| 2004-012642 | Jan 2004 | JP |
| 2004-212638 | Jul 2004 | JP |
| 2004-212680 | Jul 2004 | JP |
| 2005 279831 | Oct 2005 | JP |
| 2005-308871 | Nov 2005 | JP |
| 2007 027150 | Feb 2007 | JP |
| WO 9814804 | Apr 1998 | WO |
| WO 9843129 | Oct 1998 | WO |
| WO 9859382 | Dec 1998 | WO |
| WO 0153113 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| WO 0224570 | Mar 2002 | WO |
| WO 02086582 | Oct 2002 | WO |
| WO 03105198 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| WO 2006036386 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Notice to Submit a Response dated Mar. 26, 2012 in Korean App. No. 10-2011-0003302. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Sep. 12, 2011 in App. No. 08075220.7. |
| Billard, Tunable Capacitor, 5th Annual Review of LETI, Jun. 24, 2003, p. 7. |
| Conner, Hybrid Color Display Using Optical Interference Filter Array, SID Digest, pp. 577-580 (1993). |
| Hohlfeld et al., Jun. 2003, Micro-machined tunable optical filters with optimized band-pass spectrum, 12th International Conference on Transducers, Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, 2:1494-1497. |
| Jerman et al., A Miniature Fabry-Perot Interferometer with a Corrugated Silicon Diaphragm Support, (1988). |
| Jerman et al., Miniature Fabry-Perot Interferometers Micromachined in Silicon for Use in Optical Fiber WDM Systems, Transducers, San Francisco, Jun. 24-27, 1991, Proceedings on the Int'l. Conf. on Solid State Sensors and Actuators, Jun. 24, 1991, pp. 372-375. |
| Kowarz et al., Conformal grating electromechanical system (GEMS) for high-speed digital light modulation, Proceedings of the IEEEE 15th. Annual International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, MEMS 2002, pp. 568-573. |
| Longhurst, 1963, Chapter IX: Multiple Beam Interferometry, in Geometrical and Physical Optics, pp. 153-157. |
| Mehregany et al., 1996, MEMS applications in optical systems, IEEE/LEOS 1996 Summer Topical Meetings, pp. 75-76. |
| Miles et al, Oct. 21, 1997, A MEMS based interferometric modulator (IMOD) for display applications, Proceedings of Sensors Expo, pp. 281-284. |
| Miles, A New Reflective FPD Technology Using Interferometric Modulation, Journal of the SID, 5/4, 1997. |
| Miles, Interferometric modulation: MOEMS as an enabling technology for high performance reflective displays, Proceedings of SPIE, 4985:131-139, 2003. |
| Nakagawa et al., Feb. 1, 2002, Wide-field-of-view narrow-band spectral filters based on photonic crystal nanocavities, Optics Letters, 27(3):191-193. |
| Nieminen et al., 2004, Design of a temperature-stable RF MEM capacitor, IEEE Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, 13(5):705-714. |
| Pape et al., Characteristics of the deformable mirror device for optical information processing, Optical Engineering, 22(6):676-681, Nov.-Dec. 1983. |
| Tolansky, 1948, Chapter II: Multiple-Beam Interference, in Multiple-bean Interferometry of Surfaces and Films, Oxford at the Clarendon Press, pp. 8-11. |
| Wang, Jun. 29-Jul. 1, 2002, Design and fabrication of a novel two-dimension MEMS-based tunable capacitor, IEEE 2002 International Conference on Communications, Circuits and Systems and West Sino Expositions, 2:1766-1769. |
| Office Action mailed Feb. 27, 2006 in U.S. App. No. 11/057,045. |
| Office Action mailed Jul. 27, 2006 in U.S. App. No. 11/057,045. |
| Office Action dated Feb. 9, 2009 in U.S. App. No. 11/772,730. |
| Office Action dated May 9, 2008 in Chinese App. No. 200510103445.3. |
| Office Action dated Dec. 26, 2008, 2008 in Chinese App. No. 200510103445.3. |
| Office Action dated Jul. 10, 2009, 2008 in Chinese App. No. 200510103445.3. |
| Decision of Rejection dated Sep. 28, 2010 in Chinese App. No. 200510103445.3. |
| Notice of Reasons for Rejection in Japanese App. No. 2005-233651, dated Aug. 19, 2008. |
| Final Notice of Rejectino in Japanese App. No. 2005-233651, dated Nov. 10, 2009. |
| Extended European Search Report dated May 4, 2009 in App. No. 05255648.7. |
| ISR and WO for PCT/US08/068062, filed Jun. 24, 2008. |
| IPRP for PCT/US08/068062, dated Sep. 23, 2009. |
| Office Action dated Jan. 5, 2011 in U.S. App. No. 11/875,613. |
| Brosnihan et al., Jun. 2003, Optical IMEMS—a fabrication process for MEMS optical switches with integrated on-chip electronic, Transducers, Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, 12th International Conference 2003, 2(8-12):1638-1642. |
| Cacharelis et al., 1997, A Reflective-mode PDLC Light Valve Display Technology, Proceedings of European Solid State Device Research Conference (ESSDERC), pp. 596-599. |
| Maier et al., 1996, 1.3 active matrix liquid crystal spatial light modulator with 508 dpi resolution, SPIE vol. 2754, pp. 171-179. |
| Official Communication dated Jun. 20, 2011 in App. No. 05255648.7. |
| First Examination Report dated Jun. 4, 2012 in Indian patent application No. 1030/MUM/2005. |
| Official Communication dated Sep. 18, 2012 in App. No. 05255648.7. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20110234603 A1 | Sep 2011 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60613372 | Sep 2004 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11875613 | Oct 2007 | US |
| Child | 13155264 | US | |
| Parent | 11057045 | Feb 2005 | US |
| Child | 11875613 | US |