1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to devices and methods for simultaneously treating different medical conditions of a patient, and more particularly, to implantable meshes having conductive elements incorporated therein, that may be used in conjunction with neurostimulation devices or other devices for electrically stimulating selected body parts.
2. Background Discussion
Implantable surgical meshes have been widely used for a variety of different surgical procedures such as hernia repair, pelvic floor repair, urethral slings for treating incontinence, and many others. In hernia repair, meshes are placed surgically to repair the protrusion or defect. Various mesh materials and configurations have been proposed to reinforce the abdominal wall and to close abdominal wall defects by different methods well known in the art. In pelvic floor repair, mesh is used to repair the prolapse of organs within the pelvic cavity. These conditions typically involve organs, namely the bladder, bowel and uterus, that are normally supported by the pelvic floor, but have herniated or protruded into the vagina. The most common cause of pelvic floor prolapse is vaginal childbirth.
Implantable meshes have also been used to treat incontinence. The relatively thin piece of mesh, known as a “urethral sling”, is passed using a needle, without open surgery, via a suitable path that leaves the sling positioned beneath the urethra so that it provides support to the urethra under circumstances where pressure is being exerted on the urethra from the abdomen (i.e., during coughing). One such method is described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 5,899,909, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. According to this method, the tape or sling is implanted by passing an elongated, curved needle that is attached to one end of the tape through an incision in the vaginal wall, to one lateral side of the urethra, through the pelvic tissue behind the pelvic bone, and exiting out through an incision made in the abdominal wall. The procedure is then repeated passing the other end of the tape on the other lateral side of the urethra. After the tape is properly positioned, the free ends that extend outside of the abdominal wall are trimmed. Over time, fibroblasts grow into the tape to anchor the tape in the surrounding tissue. Thus, the tape is left as an implant in the body to form an artificial ligament supporting the urethra.
Sub-urethral slings have also been placed by a different approach, wherein a needle is passed first through the abdominal wall, along the same path as described above, and eventually exiting through the vaginal incision. The tape is then coupled to the needle in some manner, and pulled back through the body from the vaginal incision and out through the abdominal incision. The chosen approach, vaginal or abdominal, will often depend on the preferences of the surgeon. Yet another approach for implanting a sub-urethral sling has been recently developed, wherein the sling is placed via a pathway extending from a vaginal incision out through the obturator foramen. In still another known method, the sling is similarly placed beneath the urethra, yet is anchored within the pelvic cavity in some fashion (bone or tissue anchors) rather than extending out of the body through an incision in the abdomen or obturator foramen.
As indicated above, urethral slings, of whatever type and placed by whatever means, are used to treat stress incontinence. While stress incontinence is typically a result of an anatomical defect, another form of incontinence, urge incontinence, appears to be neurologically based and generally revealed as detrusor muscle instability or “bladder spasms.” As such it is usually not conducive to surgical correction. In some cases, women can have both stress and urge incontinence, a condition known as mixed incontinence. In many of these cases, the woman is treated for stress incontinence only to be disappointed when incontinence due to bladder spasms does not resolve itself. The urge component of mixed incontinence would then need to be treated on its own, involving additional intervention. Urge incontinence may or may not result in urine leakage, but both conditions otherwise have similar symptoms and similar forms of treatment, which generally include a combination of behavioral modification (learned strategies for reducing the urge sensation, scheduled voiding, avoidance of bladder-stimulating substances such as caffeine, and pelvic muscle exercises, with or without biofeedback) and drug therapy (typically anticholinergeic agents such as oxybutynin or tolterodine). These treatments require life-long therapy. Unfortunately, behavioral modification requires continuous effort to maintain results and the available drugs have significant side effects for many patients, causing 80% to discontinue therapy within a year. The alternative therapy is to modify lifestyle to accommodate the condition—frequent urination to avoid “accidents” and wearing protective pads or undergarments, depending on the severity of the condition.
Another approach for treating urge incontinence is the stimulation of nerves that innervate the pelvis or lower urinary tract. The sacral spinal nerve roots separate in pairs to exit laterally through the nerve root foramina. The main destinations for these roots are the sacral plexus. Nerves from this plexus provide the motor and sensory innervation of the lower limbs and pelvic organs. Specifically, the sacral plexus splits into five sacral nerve pairs, sacral spinal nerves S1 to S5. These nerves supply the thighs and lower parts of the legs, the feet, most of the external genital organs, and the area around the anus. The pudendal nerve is the largest branch of the pudendal plexus and is composed of somatosensory, somatomotor and autonomic elements derived from the anterior primary divisions of the second, third and fourth sacral nerves. The pudendal nerve affects the function of the bladder, urethral sphincter and genitals. Lower branches of the pudendal nerve contribute to peristalsis of the colon and anal sphincter contraction force. The pudendal nerve is closer to the bladder, and its stimulation innervates the bladder, thus eliminating or lessening its contractions. At least one known commercial device sold by Medtronic, Inc. of Minneapolis, Minn. stimulates the sacral nerve through a needle extended into the sacral nerve bundle. This device, however, supplies a continuous signal to provide constant stimulation of the nerve. Various drawbacks of this device include its invasive nature, and unwanted stimulation effects on other areas of the body, since the sacral nerve as a whole is being stimulated and multiple other areas of the body are innervated by such stimulation (i.e., resulting in leg twitches or the like).
A company called Advanced Bionics has an implantable stimulation device that targets the pudendal nerve specifically rather than the sacral nerve. This device is implanted in the vicinity of the pudendal nerve, but also is invasive and supplies a constant signal as described above and therefore, has the same drawbacks.
In addition to incontinence, women can suffer from other diseases as well, often simultaneously with incontinence. Interstitial cystitis is a chronic bladder condition involving an inflamed or irritated bladder wall. Patients with this condition may experience mild discomfort, pressure, tenderness, or intense pain in the bladder and surrounding pelvic area. Other symptoms may include an urgent need to urinate (urgency), frequent need to urinate (frequency), or a combination of these symptoms. The inflammation can lead to scarring and stiffening of the bladder, less bladder capacity (the bladder is able to hold less urine), and pinpoint bleeding in the bladder lining. In rare cases, ulcers form in the bladder lining. Of the more than 700,000 Americans estimated to have interstitial cystitis, about 90 percent are women.
Treatments for interstitial cystitis include oral medicines, such as aspirin, ibuprofen, other painkillers, antidepressants and antihistamines. Another treatment is bladder instillation (a bladder wash or bath) in which the bladder is filled with a solution that is held for varying periods of time before being emptied. These treatments require life-long therapy. Sacral nerve stimulation implants are also used for the treatment of interstitial cystitis, but, as stated previously, its invasive nature and unwanted stimulation effects on other areas of the body make this treatment undesirable. Surgery, considered a treatment of last resort, does not necessarily improve symptoms.
Other diseases that may occur simultaneously with urinary incontinence include fecal and anal incontinence. Fecal incontinence is the inability to control the bowels, and can have several causes with constipation being the most common. Fecal incontinence can also be caused by injury to one or both of the ring-like muscles at the end of the rectum called the anal internal and/or external sphincters. In women, the damage often happens when giving birth. Hemorrhoid surgery can damage the sphincters as well. Fecal incontinence can also be caused by damage to the nerves that control the anal sphincters or to the nerves that sense stool in the rectum. Nerve damage can also be caused by childbirth, a long-term habit of straining to pass stool, stroke, and diseases that affect the nerves, such as diabetes and multiple sclerosis. In addition, rectal surgery, radiation treatment, and inflammatory bowel disease can cause scarring that makes the walls of the rectum stiff and less elastic. Abnormalities of the pelvic floor, which is typically caused by childbirth, can also lead to fecal incontinence. Examples of some abnormalities are decreased perception of rectal sensation, decreased anal canal pressures, decreased squeeze pressure of the anal canal, impaired anal sensation, a dropping down of the rectum (rectal prolapse), protrusion of the rectum through the vagina (rectocele), and/or generalized weakness and sagging of the pelvic floor. Treatment depends on the cause and severity of fecal incontinence, and may include dietary changes, medication, bowel training, or surgery. A last resort is a colostomy, which is the surgical creation of an opening between the large intestine and the abdominal wall. More than one treatment may be necessary for successful control since continence is a complicated chain of events.
One type of treatment typically cannot be used to treat the different conditions described above, and, as indicated above, many of the known treatments are invasive or have other negative side effects. Accordingly, what is needed is an improved device and method for simultaneously treating different diseases or conditions.
The present invention provides a medial treatment device for treating at least first and second medical conditions of a patient. The device includes a neurostimulation device for treating a first neurologically based condition of the patient, which further includes a first waveform generator adapted to generate a first waveform having a frequency capable of stimulating a predetermined nerve of the patient, a second waveform generator adapted to generate a carrier waveform having a frequency capable of passing through tissue of the patient, a modulation device electrically coupled to the first and second waveform generators and adapted to modulate the first and carrier waveforms to create a modulated waveform, and an electrode electrically coupled to the modulation device and positioned substantially adjacent to skin of the patient, and adapted to apply the modulated waveform thereto. The device also includes an implantable mesh adapted for implantation within the patient to treat a second medical condition of the patient, wherein the implantable mesh has a plurality of incorporated electrically conductive elements adapted to conduct the applied modulated waveform to a position closer to the predetermined nerve than the electrode when the mesh is implanted.
Also provided is a method for treating at least first and second medical conditions of a patient, the method including generating a first waveform having a frequency capable of stimulating a predetermined nerve of the patient to treat a first neurologically based condition of the patient, generating a carrier waveform having a frequency capable of passing through tissue of the patient, modulating the first waveform with the carrier waveform to produce a modulated signal, applying the modulated signal to the patient's skin, and using an implanted mesh having a plurality of incorporated conductive elements to conduct the applied modulated signal to a location closer to the predetermined nerve than the electrode.
Also provided is an implant for treating female urinary incontinence in a patient including a substantially flat, flexible mesh or netting adapted to be implanted into a female patient's body as a supportive loop beneath the patient's urethra, wherein the mesh or netting is further comprised of interwoven fibers, at least one of which is electrically conductive.
Finally, the present invention also provides a medial treatment device for treating at least first and second medical conditions of a patient, including a stimulation device for treating a first medical condition of the patient with electrical stimulation, and an implantable mesh adapted for implantation within the patient to treat a second medical condition of the patient, wherein the implantable mesh has a plurality of incorporated electrically conductive elements adapted to conduct electrical stimulation from the stimulation device to a position closer to a predetermined body part the stimulation of which at least partially treats the first medical condition.
a are schematic illustrations of transdermal transmission devices according to selected embodiments of the present invention;
a and 2b illustrates exemplary waveforms generated by the devices of
a illustrates the sensor device of
b illustrates the sensor device of
a-7c illustrate various steps of deployment of the implantable sensor device of
a illustrates an alternate embodiment of the implantable sensor device;
b illustrates yet another embodiment of an implantable sensor device;
a-c illustrate use of the transdermal transmission device in connection with a conductive gel tract; and
a-13f illustrate use of the transdermal transmission devices described herein in connection with a conductive, implantable mesh.
Before explaining the present invention in detail, it should be noted that the invention is not limited in its application or use to the details of construction and arrangement of parts illustrated in the accompanying drawings and description. The illustrative embodiments of the invention may be implemented or incorporated in other embodiments, variations and modifications, and may be practiced or carried out in various ways. For example, although the present invention is described in detail as it relates to sub-urethral slings for females, it is to be understood that it can be readily adapted for use with other types of implantable meshes, and for use in treating various conditions in males, and children as well as adults.
As will be described more fully below, the present invention provides a conductive mesh capable of conducting electrical energy deeper into the body. The present invention also provides a neuro-stimulation device for treating a selected nerve-based physiological condition or other physical condition treatable with electrical stimulation, in conjunction with a such a surgical mesh implant for treating a second, different condition. The mesh implant itself is uniquely designed to improve the effectiveness of the neuro-stimulation.
A preferred embodiment of a stimulation device will be described below in detail, although it is to be understood that other stimulation devices may be used as well. Referring first to a preferred embodiment of a neuro-stimulation device, a unique aspect of this device is the manner in which the nerve(s) or other body parts are stimulated, which is transdermally rather than via a needle or other invasive element inserted within the body in close proximity to the nerve. This has obvious advantages in comfort for the patient, but also eliminates the surgical risk of mistakenly injuring other nerves or vessels. The system provides direct, but preferably selective stimulation to a nerve or the like that may be, if desired, controlled in part based on biofeedback data corresponding to physiological conditions sensed in the body, such as bladder contractions.
With regard to its application for stimulating nerves, an underlying principal of its operation is the fact that nerves within the body can be selectively targeted for stimulation without affecting adjacent neurons. As is well known to those skilled in the art, bioelectric potentials are produced as a result of electrochemical activity of excitable cells found within nervous system tissue. These excitable cells exist in two electrical states, resting potential or action potential. Cells remain in the resting potential state until adequate stimulus is provided to cause the cell to reach the action or threshold potential, at which time the nerve “fires,” and the action potential travels at a constant conduction velocity unattenuated along the cell membranes. This all-or-nothing response of the action potential causes the cell's membrane potential to go through a characteristic repeatable cycle, where the potential first goes from the negative resting potential, to a positive action potential, and then back down to the negative resting potential again all within approximately 1 ms. The response remains the same regardless of the magnitude of the stimulus, so long as it exceeds the threshold potential.
As is also well known, when an excitable cell membrane has an action potential response (from an adequate stimulus), its ability to respond to a second stimulus is significantly altered. During the initial, depolarizing portion of the action potential, the cell membrane cannot respond to additional stimulus regardless of its intensity. This period is referred to as the absolute refractory period. Immediately following the absolute refractory period is the relative refractory period where the cell membrane can respond only to intense stimulation. The existence of the absolute and relative refractory periods results in an upper frequency limit at which a cell can be repeatedly discharged. Thus, neurons can be seen as frequency dependent devices. The frequency dependent component of the neuron depends on its total capacitance, which will vary from neuron to neuron and will be a function of its length, diameter, coating (myelination) and the permeativity of the dielectric medium. In other words, for any given dielectric medium, varying either the length or diameter of the neuron, or its myelination, will vary its total capacitance.
Since neurons in the human body do vary greatly in diameter, length and myelination, the capacitance and conduction velocity (operating frequency) for these neurons vary as well. Using these differences in physical characteristics of adjacent neurons, selected nerves can be targeted for stimulation without affecting adjacent neurons. That is, selective neural stimulation can be achieved by characterizing the frequency response (capacitance) of adjacent neurons, and tuning the stimulation frequency to an area of no-overlap. For example, consider two adjacent neurons, where neuron A has a frequency band of operation from 0-20 Hz, and neuron B has a frequency band of operation from 20-30 Hz. Thus, within the frequency band of 20-30 Hz, neuron B can be selectively stimulated with no effect on neuron A. Further, neuron A can be selectively stimulated even in an overlapping frequency range if stimulation is applied during neuron B's absolute refractory period, during which no amount of stimulation will cause neuron B to fire as discussed above, or if the stimulation is less than the magnitude required to cause stimulation during the relative refractory period. As described further below, these principles can be applied to achieve selective stimulation of two or more nerves within the body.
As indicated above, it is known that surface electrodes can be used to stimulate both nerves and muscles within the body. One problem that is encountered, however, is that the applied electrical signals tend to spread widely, affecting untargeted muscles and nerves as well as targeted ones, which is often undesirable. Further, to account for this signal dissipation, the applied current levels must be significantly increased to ensure adequate current densities at the targeted site. Another challenge associated with transdermal application of electrical signals is the fact that some nerves are stimulated by a low frequency signal, such as the pudendal nerve which is stimulated by a frequency on the order of 10-40 Hz. Such a low frequency signal cannot itself pass through body tissue, and therefore is not conducive to direct transdermal application. Many of these challenges have been overcome by the devices described in detail below.
The signal transmitter 100 includes a suitable power source 102 such as a lithium ion film battery by CYMBET™Corp. of Elk River, Minn., model number CPF141490L, and at least first 104, second 106 and third 107 waveform generators that are electrically coupled to and powered by the battery. These waveform generators may be of any suitable type, such as those sold by Texas Instruments of Dallas, Tex. under model number NE555. The first waveform generator 104 generates a first waveform 202 (see
As described in detail in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/146,522, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, this modulated signal 206 can be provided to an appropriate surface electrode 110, such as DURA-STICK Self Adhesive Electrodes from Chattanooga Group, Inc. of Hixson, TN, that applies the modulated waveform directly to the skin. As is readily understood by those skilled in the art, the use of the modulated signal enables transmission of the waveform through tissue due to the high frequency nature of the carrier waveform, yet allows it to be detected (and responded to) by the pudendal nerve due to the low frequency envelope of the modulated signal.
Although a simple modulated signal 206 can be applied to selectively affect one nerve, the modulated signal 206 has periodic periods of inactivity 209 that can further be taken advantage of to generate a signal package capable of transdermally and selectively stimulating two or more nerves or other body parts. To accomplish this, a third waveform generator 107 generates a third waveform having a frequency different from the first waveform and that is specifically selected to stimulate a second nerve or body part. An exemplary third waveform 210 is shown in
As indicated above, the first and third waveform generators generate their respective waveforms 202, 210 out of phase with each other so that when combined with the carrier waveform 204 they appear along separate and discrete portions of the signal package 212, and each of the first and third waveforms have a frequency selected to specifically target different nerves or body portions. For example, the first waveform 202 may have a frequency of 20 Hz, which is known to have an effect on the autonomic element branches of the pudendal nerve which is known to affect overactive bladder, and the third waveform may have a frequency of 10 Hz, which is known to have an effect on the somatomotor branch of the pudendal nerve that is useful in treating intersticial cystitis. To the extent there is an overlap in frequency ranges, the third waveform can be applied during the refractory period of the first nerve as previously stated.
By the system and method described above, individual components of the modulated signal package can be used to selectively target different nerves, different nerve branches, or selected other body parts. That is, a single patch could provide stimulation signals designed to relieve multiple different symptoms such as those associated with overactive bladder, fecal incontinence, interstitial cystitis and any other pelvic floor disorder.
Although one specific embodiment has been described thus far, those skilled in the art will recognize that the appropriate signals may be manipulated in many different ways to achieve suitable modulated signals and/or signal packages. For example, a fourth waveform generator 109 may also be included that generates a fourth carrier waveform 214 having a frequency different from the second carrier waveform. This may be desirable if stimulation of the first and second nerve or body part will require the signal(s) to pass through different types or amounts of tissue. As illustrated, using a single amplitude modulator 108 the fourth carrier waveform 214 must be applied only during periods of inactivity of the first waveform to avoid affecting what would be modulated signal 206. In the alternative, as shown in
As can be seen from signal package 212, there are still periods of the waveform that are not active. Additional signals can be inserted into these periods to target other frequency independent pudendal nerves or other body parts.
Referring now back to
Although capable of being applied transdermally only, the conductance of the stimulation energy from the surface electrode to the target nerve can be increased by the placement of a conductive pathway or “tract” that may extend either fully or partially from the surface electrode to the target nerve as illustrated by
a illustrates an instance where the conductive gel tract 1201 extends from the transdermal stimulation device positioned on the skin 1200 of a patient to a location closer to the targeted nerve 1202 or nerve bundle. Another advantage of using such a gel material, however, is that unlike rigid conductors (wire), the gel can be pushed into foramina and other recessed areas. Wire or needle electrodes can only come in proximity to one plane of the target nerve, whereas the deformable and flowable gel material can envelope the target nerve as shown in
Although one suitable conductive gel has been described above, various others are also suitable. Many thermoset hydrogels and thermoplastic hydrogels could be used as well. Examples of thermoset hydrogels include cross-linked varieties of polyHEMA and copolymers, N-substituted acrylamides, polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), poly(glyceryl methacrylate), poly(ethylene oxide), poly(vinyl alcohol), poly(acrylic acid), poly(methacrylic acid), poly(N,N-dimethylaminopropyl-N′-acrylimade), and combinations thereof with hydrophilic and hydrophobic comonomers, cross-linkers and other modifiers. Examples of thermoplastic hydrogels include acrylic derivatives such as HYPAN, vinyl alcohol derivatives, hydrophilic polyurethanes (HPU) and Styrene/PVP block copolymers.
In accordance with the present invention, the conductance of stimulation energy from the surface electrode to the target nerve can also be increased by the placement of a mesh with conductive element, or fibers or wires integrated therein as illustrated by
As described above, in the case of urinary incontinence, a mesh or tape having such conductive elements incorporated therein as described further below, is passed through pelvic tissue and positioned between the urethra and vaginal wall, creating a supportive sling. The mesh provides a structure for tissue in-growth and thereby provides newly created body tissue for supporting the urethra. When pressure is exerted upon the nerves within the lower abdomen, such as during a cough or sneeze, the mesh provides support to the urethra, allowing it to keep its seal and prevent the unwanted discharge of urine.
Referring now to
The mesh may be of any convenient shape that suits the intended purpose. The mesh may be single or double ply, generally planar in structure, or, if appropriate, tubular to provide additional supporting strength and more surface area on which tissue fibers may attach. Moreover, the mesh may consist of different types of material, such as bioabsorbable and non-bio-absorbable material. The mesh may also be coated with an antimicrobial additive to prevent or minimize infection and a lubricious coating, for example, a bioabsorbable hydrogel, to facilitate the mesh passing through the tissue as discussed below. The mesh may also be made radio-opaque and/or of a contrasting color to the body tissue to allow for future diagnostic visualization.
According to one embodiment shown in
Conductive fibers 1301 may be made of metal such as Nitonol, or any other biocompatible conductive metal. The fibers may also be a non-conductive material such as a polypropylene coated with a conductive metal or polymer. The conductive portion 1305 of the fiber may extend the entire length of the fiber as shown in
Referring now to
As stated previously, mesh constructed as described herein can conduct stimulation energy from the surface electrode to the target nerve, reducing energy dispersion and increasing the efficiency of the energy transfer between the surface electrode and the target nerve.
The mesh can be implanted by any accepted surgical method of placing meshes in the body. Once the mesh is properly positioned, the conductive fibers, if movable, may then be optimally positioned in order to perform their intended function. If also used for neurostimulation, the transdermal patch is then placed on the appropriate region of the skin (i.e, the sacral region if used to stimulate the pudendal nerve), and the energy is transmitted from the patch through the skin and conductive fibers in the mesh, to the desired nerve.
The above-described devices may also be used in conjunction with biofeedback mechanisms that are used to control application of the electrical stimulation. For example, bio-feedback can be used to create a closed-loop system for treating urge incontinence in which pudendal nerve stimulation is selective and applied only when necessary as opposed to constantly as has been the case with known attempts at pudendal nerve stimulation. Such a system further includes one or more sensor devices 115 that are preferably implanted within the body. The sensor devices preferably include at least one sensor 120 (
Referring now to
Referring now to
Preferably, the biofeedback system (exclusive of the housing) has an overall size of about 0.65-10 mm in diameter d, and about 0.65-10 mm in length l. In a preferred embodiment, the sensor component is a micro-miniature piezo-resistive pressure transducer for measuring pressure within a patient's bladder. A suitable transducer is an MPX series pressure sensor from Motorola of Schaumburg, III. Other suitable components may include the MSP430F149microcontroller from Texas Instruments, Inc. of Dallas, Tex. that can be used to acquire, filter and store data from the pressure sensor, and power source such as any suitable biocompatible lithium battery. Although particular suitable electronic components have been named above, many others also exist and could be incorporated into the present invention. As indicated, the electronic components are preferably mounted on printed circuit board. Subsequently, the components and circuit board can be covered or encapsulated in silicone or other suitable covering to protect them from the environment, such as the fluid environment in the bladder
Referring now again to the housing 510 as illustrated in greater detail in
In another embodiment, the expandable cage may be made of an absorbable material such as Ethisorb® (an absorbable synthetic composite made from polyglactin and polydioxanon) from Ethicon, Inc. of Somerville, N.J., or a combination of absorbable and non-absorbable materials. The absorbable material would preferably dissolve after a predetermined period of time, such as at least 2-3 days, so that the implantable device could be used for temporary data acquisition and subsequently expelled from the body in a non-invasive manner after sufficient data has been gathered.
As an alternative to the collapsible cage described above, the housing could have a stable structure rather than a collapsible structure that itself has an outer diameter D that is smaller than the diameter of the urethra to allow insertion therethrough into the bladder (see
In order to implant the device 115, the housing 510 is compressed and loaded into a single or multi-lumen catheter 700 as shown in
As mentioned above, alternate embodiments that do not employ expandable cages may also be suitable, such as that shown in
For purposes of the present invention, the device 115 would preferably remain within the bladder for an extended period of time to provide constant feedback used to control operation of the electrode. Where constant feedback is not used (i.e.,
Under these circumstances, the biofeedback device may further incorporate a data storage device 408 (
Referring again to
In an alternate embodiment, one of the two implantable devices transmits data to the other, which then wirelessly transmits both sets of data to receiver 310.
In yet another embodiment, the first implantable device within the bladder further includes one or more additional sensors 950 that are incorporated into one or more tail elements, as shown in
Further, multiple tail elements 950a, 950b, 950c may incorporate multiple sensor elements 952a, 952b, 952c as shown in
It will be apparent from the foregoing that, while particular forms of the invention have been illustrated and described, various modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is not intended that the invention be limited, except as by the appended claims.
The present application a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/343,627, now U.S. Pat. Ser. No. 8,165,695, and Ser. No. 11/344,285, now U.S. Pat. Ser. No. 7,647,112, both filed on Jan. 31, 2006, which are both continuation-in-parts of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/146522, now U.S. Pat. Ser. No. 7,979,137, filed on Jun. 7, 2005, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/043,830, now abandoned, filed on Jan. 26, 2005, which claims priority to U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/543722, filed on Feb. 11, 2004.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3683915 | Voss | Aug 1972 | A |
3902502 | Liss et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3933147 | DuVall et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
3941136 | Bucalo | Mar 1976 | A |
4406288 | Horwinski et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4537195 | McDonnell | Aug 1985 | A |
4719922 | Padjen et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4909255 | Farin | Mar 1990 | A |
4989605 | Rossen | Feb 1991 | A |
5167237 | Rabin et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5350414 | Kolen | Sep 1994 | A |
5358514 | Schulman | Oct 1994 | A |
5421817 | Liss et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5458630 | Hoegnelid et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5464434 | Alt | Nov 1995 | A |
5476481 | Schondorf | Dec 1995 | A |
5487759 | Bastyr et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5556421 | Prutchi et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5558640 | Pfeiler et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5562717 | Tippey et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5617876 | van Duyl | Apr 1997 | A |
5645062 | Anderson et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5702428 | Tippey et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5722996 | Bonnet et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5730125 | Prutchi et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735887 | Barreras, Sr. et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5791344 | Schulman et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5851223 | Liss et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5899909 | Claren et al. | May 1999 | A |
5902329 | Hoffmann et al. | May 1999 | A |
5984854 | Ishikawa et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993414 | Haller | Nov 1999 | A |
6035236 | Jarding et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6092530 | Weissman et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6099479 | Christopherson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6155267 | Nelson | Dec 2000 | A |
6164284 | Schulman et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167304 | Loos | Dec 2000 | A |
6183461 | Matsuura et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199575 | Widner | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6205359 | Boveja | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6221024 | Miesel | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231516 | Keilman et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240317 | Villaseca et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6263246 | Goedeke et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6285897 | Kilcoyne et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298272 | Peterfeso et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6330885 | Weissman et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6354991 | Gross et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6360129 | Ley et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366814 | Boveja et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377853 | Malaney et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6384353 | Huang et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6402689 | Scarantino et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6404204 | Farruggia et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413393 | Van Antwerp et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432050 | Porat et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438407 | Ousdigian et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442413 | Silver | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443883 | Ostrow et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6447462 | Wallace et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459933 | Lurie et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471645 | Warkentin et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6497655 | Linberg et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505074 | Boveja et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6516227 | Meadows | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6535766 | Thompson et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6560490 | Grill et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6567706 | Bar-Or et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6652449 | Gross et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6662052 | Sarwal et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6668191 | Boveja | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6701185 | Burnett et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712772 | Cohen et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6751501 | Schuler et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6836684 | Rijkhoff et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6862480 | Cohen et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6879859 | Boveja | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6907293 | Grill et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7047078 | Boggs, II et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7054690 | Imran | May 2006 | B2 |
7062330 | Boveja et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7310557 | Maschino et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7387603 | Gross et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7427280 | Gerber | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7502652 | Gaunt et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7599736 | DiLorenzo | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7676271 | Wahlstrand et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7815895 | Katagiri et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8170683 | Wahlgren | May 2012 | B2 |
20010018606 | Ingle et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010025137 | Webb et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010051768 | Schulman et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020001870 | Oda et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020011592 | Matsuo | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020026141 | Houben et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026244 | Trieu | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020082480 | Riff et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020103514 | Abrahamson | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107540 | Whalen et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111542 | Warkentin et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020133196 | Thompson | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020151816 | Rich et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030004403 | Drinan et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030004553 | Grill et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030162021 | Van Heerden et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030204224 | Torgerson et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030212305 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220669 | Shealy | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030233137 | Paul | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040068203 | Gellman et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040236194 | Meyer | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050177067 | Tracey et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050277998 | Tracey et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060047325 | Thimineur et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060095090 | De Ridder | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111756 | Chang | May 2006 | A1 |
20060167500 | Towe et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060178703 | Huston | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195146 | Tracey et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195153 | DiUbaldi | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060229688 | McClure | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060247721 | Maschino | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070162085 | DiLorenzo | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167990 | Mangrum et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070219606 | Moreci et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233204 | Lima et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070260288 | Gross | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080132962 | DiUbaldi et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080132969 | Bennett et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147146 | Wahlgren et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080161874 | Bennett et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080293830 | Katagiri et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090005713 | Podrazhansky et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090048642 | Goroszeniuk | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090054952 | Glukhovsky et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090062874 | Tracey et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090132018 | DiUbaldi et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090157149 | Wahlgren et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090187230 | Dilorenzo | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100042018 | Kleinsinger | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042180 | Mueller et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100076533 | Dar et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1593683 | Mar 2005 | CN |
1745857 | Mar 2006 | CN |
10033400 | Jan 2001 | DE |
0783267 | Feb 1999 | EP |
1048264 | Nov 2000 | EP |
200316991 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2001-259047 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2003135607 | May 2003 | JP |
2003-220149 | Aug 2003 | JP |
WO 9014127 | Nov 1990 | WO |
WO 9718856 | May 1997 | WO |
WO 9739796 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 9955411 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 0033738 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 0033065 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0149369 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0156633 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0222008 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 0227294 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 02058551 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 02062215 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 03015625 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 03020364 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03030733 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO 03071944 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 2004050172 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2005002663 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005079909 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2007092301 | Aug 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Junge et al. “Titanium coating of a polypropylene mesh for hernia repair: Effect on biocmpatibility”. Hernia vol. 6 No. 9 p. 115-119. Published online Dec. 4, 2004. |
Walter et al, “Evaluation of a 316LVM Woven Eye Electrode for Direct Bladder Stimulation”, Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 1991, vol. 13:1991, Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Orlando, FL, USA, Oct. 31-Nov. 3, 1991, New York, NY, USA, IEEE, US, Oct. 31, 1991, pp. 1853-1854. |
Siwapornsathain, E. et al., “Telemetry and Sensor Platform for Ambulatory Urodynamics”, Proceedings of the 2nd Annual International IEEE-EMBS Special Topica Conference on Microtechnologies in Medicine & Biology, Madison, WI, May 2002. |
Rousche, P.J. et al. “Flexible Polyimide-Based Intracortical Electrode Arrays with Bioactive Capability”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 48, No. 3 (2001). |
Becker, T.J. “CardioMEMS Moves Closer to Commercializing Its Innovative Heart Sensors”, (1905) ATDC News & Information, Georgia Institute of Technology. |
Voskerician, G. et al., “Biocompatibility and biofouling of MEMS drug delivery devices” Biomaterials, 24, 1959-1967 (2003). |
Fiber Optic Sensors, Product Datasheet FOP-M Pressure sensor (undated). |
Chappell, J. Electronic News—Ambient Intelligence (2002). |
Co-owned, copending U.S. Appl. No. 12/661,949, filed on Mar. 26, 2010. |
Co-owned, copending U.S. Appl. No. 11/866,588, filed on Oct. 3, 2007. |
Copending, co-owned U.S. Appl. No. 60/543,722, filed Feb. 11, 2004. |
Copending, co-owned U.S. Appl. No. 11/043,830, filed Jan. 26, 2005. |
Copending, co-owned U.S. Appl. No. 11/146,522, filed Jun. 7, 2005. |
Copending, co-owned U.S. Appl. No. 11/343,627, filed Jan. 31, 2006. |
Copending, co-owned U.S. Appl. No. 11/497,861, filed Aug. 2, 2006. |
Copending, co-owned U.S. Appl. No. 11/344,285, filed Jan. 31, 2006. |
Copending, co-owned U.S. Appl. No. 13/094,644, filed Apr. 26, 2011. |
Copending, co-owned U.S. Appl. No. 61/211,197, filed on Mar. 27, 2009. |
English translation of Jun. 26, 2012 Office Action from Japanese Patent Office in counterpart Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-515738 (3 pages). |
Frost & Sullivan Report 2002. |
Rosell, J. et al., “Skin Impedance from 1 Hz to 1 MHz,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 35, No. 8, Aug. 1988, pp. 649-651. |
Reilly, J. Patrick, “Electrical Stimulation and Electropathology,” Cambridge University Press (1992); pp. 120-129; 190-205; 252-261; 308-325; 447-459. |
International Search Report dated Sep. 2, 2010 for International Application No. PCT/US2010/028690 (8 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070185541 A1 | Aug 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60543722 | Jan 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11343627 | Jan 2006 | US |
Child | 11497861 | US | |
Parent | 11344285 | Jan 2006 | US |
Child | 11343627 | US | |
Parent | 11146522 | Jun 2005 | US |
Child | 11344285 | US | |
Parent | 11043830 | Jan 2005 | US |
Child | 11146522 | US |