The present invention relates generally to a conductor cleaning system, and more particularly to a system for cleaning aluminum strands of all aluminum and steel reinforced electrical conductors, such as ACSS, ACSR, ACAR, and AAA.
In current power transmission systems, failures can pose a significant risk to the reliability of the system. There are several factors that contribute to these failures—one such factor is the failure of compression connectors.
Current data suggests that a primary root cause for failures in compression connectors is improper installation. Examples of improper installation include lack of compound, alignment, wrong die, and poor cleaning of the aluminum strands of the conductor prior to installation of compression connectors. Research indicates that corrosion products and other contaminants (resulting from years of exposure to the environment) left on the conductors during splice assembly can raise the resistance of the splice-conductor joint (this is also true of new conductors which have oxidation and contaminants thereon). Cyclical variations of load current feeding through the increased resistance of the splice-conductor joint causes thermal expansion/contraction that eventually reduces the grip of the splice to a point where it can no longer hold the conductor.
Currently, compression connector installers clean the aluminum strands with a wire brush, which results in ineffective cleaning of the strands, leaving corrosion products and other contaminants behind. Further, the installer cannot clean internal strands using the wire brush unless the installer takes the time to unstrand the conductor. Unfortunately, unstranding is impractical in most field conditions and can increase the risk of damage to the individual strands.
Accordingly, there is a need for a conductor cleaning system that can effectively clean both outer and inner strands of a conductor without the need to unstrand the conductor.
These and other shortcomings of the prior art are addressed by the present invention, which provides a conductor cleaning system capable of cleaning external and internal strands of a conductor without unstranding the conductor.
According to one aspect of the present invention, a conductor cleaning system includes a container adapted to receive a portion of a conductor to be cleaned, a housing adapted to receive and support the container, and a cleaning solution contained in the container for cleaning the portion of the conductor. The cleaning solution is adapted to clean the conductor without reacting with or damaging the conductor.
According to another aspect of the present invention, a cleaning solution adapted to clean electrical conductors without damaging galvanization coatings or degrading aluminum contained in the coatings or conductor has a composition, by approximate weight percent, of 0.985 to 8.97 NaOH, 0.49 to 1.45 NaF, and 89.7 to 98.5 H2O
According to another aspect of the present invention, a method of cleaning an electrical conductor includes providing a conductor cleaning system having a container and an agitator. The method further includes providing a cleaning solution for cleaning of the electrical conductor, introducing the cleaning solution into the container, positioning an electrical conductor in the cleaning solution disposed in the container, and activating the agitator, thereby agitating the cleaning solution and enhancing its ability to clean the electrical conductor.
The subject matter that is regarded as the invention may be best understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing figures in which:
Referring to the drawings, an exemplary conductor cleaning system according to the present invention is illustrated in
The vibrator housing 13 is adapted to receive and support the container 11, and includes an attachment rail 16 to allow the system 10 to be attached to a support for easy operation or to allow a user to easily carry the system 10. Other attachments such as a hook-type attachment may also be used to attach the system 10 to a bucket of a bucket truck or other suitable support. A standing base 17 is disposed at one end of the housing 13 to allow the system 10 to be positioned in a stand-up position such that the tube 11 is in a vertical position. The base 17 may be adapted to accept supports to further stabilize the system 10 in the vertical position, as shown in
As shown in
Referring to
As illustrated in
The cleaning solution is contained in the tube 11 to allow an end of a conductor to be cleaned properly while reducing spills and splashes. The cleaning solution is designed and optimized to permit cleaning of aluminum strands of conductors without unstranding the conductor. Namely, the cleaning solution is designed to permit internal and external cleaning of aluminum strands of the conductor without reacting and damaging the galvanization of galvanized steel strands; to not react with or degrade aluminum strands after the cleaning process is complete; to clean over a wide range of temperatures; to not react with inhibitor compounds used in compression connector installation; and to be environmentally acceptable.
The cleaning solution uses a caustic solution of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) as a cleaning agent due to the tri-hydrated oxide of aluminum found in corrosion products being soluble in this type of solution. It should be appreciated that other suitable caustic hydroxides may be used. The caustic level of the solution is equal to, or less than, that of standard household cleaners. A low concentration of sodium fluoride (NaF) enhances the solubility of the aluminum oxides and reduces the time needed to complete the cleaning. The predominant reactions occurring during cleaning are as follows:
Al2O3+2NaOH2NaAlO2+H2O
2Al+2NaOH+2H2O→2NaAlO3+3H2.
The reaction products are essentially stable and do not react with Al and the corrosion layer Al2O3. Only NaOH chemically attacks both Al and Al2O3. Examples of cleaning solutions are shown in the Table below.
In testing, all of the above solutions provided good to excellent cleaning results. For example, in one test, a cleaning solution having a low level of causticity and relatively simple composition was chosen. The cleaning solution had the following concentrations:
Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH)=20 g (approx. weight percent=1.93)
Sodium Fluoride (NaF)=15 g (approx. weight percent=1.45)
Water (H2O)=1 L. (approx. weight percent=96.62)
It should be appreciated that other concentrations could be used depending on the application. For example, it was found that solutions having approximate weight percent ranges of 0.985 to 8.97 NaOH, 0.49 to 1.45 NaF, and 89.7 to 98.5H2O were acceptable. The chemicals were mixed in the water until completely dissolved. It was determined that the level of cleaning and the time to achieve that level were dependent on the solution temperature and the amount of agitation provided to the solution by the vibrator 12. This can be seen in the table below.
It should be appreciated that other forms of agitation may be used, such as ultrasonic, bubbling air, stirring, etc.
When using a cleaning solution with ACSS and other conductors having aluminum incorporated into the steel core's zinc coating, care must be taken to prevent damaging the aluminum in the Al—Zn coating that protects the steel strands of the electrical conductor. The Al—Zn coating protects the steel strands from corrosion and degradation of the coating would be detrimental to the life of the electrical conductor. As a result, it was determined that the use of an inhibitor in the cleaning solution would be beneficial.
It was found that an inhibitor such as sodium silicate (Na2O(SiO2)x(H2O)x) protected the Al—Zn coating while allowing the cleaning solution to adequately clean the electrical conductor. It was further found that a approximate weight percent range of 0.15 to 1.42 of sodium silicate was acceptable. When mixing the sodium silicate with the cleaning solution it was found that a solution, by approximate weight percent, of (0.15 to 1.42) Na2O(SiO2)x(H2O)x+(1.90 to 1.93) NaOH+(1.43 to 1.45)NaF+(95.24 to 96.47) H2O adequately cleaned the electrical conductors and protected the Al—Zn coating.
In addition to preventing damage to the Al in the Al—Zn coating, the pH is a concern due to EPA regulations for handling chemical solutions. Thus, it is beneficial to maintain the cleaning solution below a pH of 12.5. It was found, that various chemicals could be used to lower the pH of the solution. For example, it was found that a CaCl2 solution could lower the pH from 13.0 to 12.4. However, the CaCl2 solution tends to leave a residue.
It was further found that the use of ascorbic acid provided many benefits that the other chemicals did not. For example, the ascorbic acid was beneficial for both lowering the pH and for protecting the Al—Zn coating. An acceptable range, by approximate weight percent, of ascorbic acid was found to be 0.193 to 3.54. This results in a cleaning solution having a composition, by approximate weight percent, of (0.193 to 3.54) ascorbic acid+(1.87 to 1.93) NaOH+(1.40 to 1.45)NaF+(93.28 to 96.43) H2O.
In addition to lowering the pH and protecting the Al—Zn coating, when using the ascorbic acid, it was unexpectedly found that after a certain number of cleanings the pH of the cleaning solution dramatically fell off (See
As can be seen from
In use, the tube 11 is inserted through the guide straps 18 and 19 of the vibrator housing 13 and secured in position by the retaining strap 22 and support 23. As discussed, the tube 11 may be disposable or permanently attached to the system 10. In the case of a disposable tube, the tube 11 may be pre-filled with the cleaning solution and a plug 42 would be inserted into an end of the tube 11 to prevent spilling of the solution. The tube would then be attached to the system 10 and carried, as shown in
In the case of a permanent tube, the tube 11 would be attached to the system 10 and carried to the conductor cleaning site. The cleaning solution could be poured into the tube 11 and sealed therein by the plug 42 prior to delivery to the cleaning site, could be delivered to the site in another container and then poured into the tube at the site, or could be in powder form which would be mixed with water at the site.
Referring to
As discussed, during the cleaning cycle of the conductor, the system 10 may be supported in various ways to relieve the burden, on the user, of supporting the system 10. For example, if the system is to be supported in a vertical position, supports may be attached to the base 17,
Other support methods may also be employed. For example, in
Referring to
In use, the container 111 is positioned at a point along the conductor 143 where cleaning is desired and moved into engagement with the conductor 143. Seals 160 and 161 permit the conductor 143 to be pressed into the container 111 until the conductor 143 is immersed in the cleaning solution. The seals 160 and 161 prevent the cleaning solution from leaking between the container 111 and the conductor 143.
The foregoing has described a conductor cleaning system. While specific embodiments of the present invention have been described, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications thereto can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the foregoing description of the preferred embodiment of the invention and the best mode for practicing the invention are provided for the purpose of illustration only and not for the purpose of limitation.
We claim:
This application is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/357,610 filed on Jan. 22, 2009.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12357610 | Jan 2009 | US |
Child | 12608079 | US |