1. Field of the Invention
The present invention generally relates to anatomical support structures used during medical procedures and, more particularly, to devices for supporting and positioning portions of a patient's body when undergoing surgery or other therapeutic procedures.
2. Background and Description of the Prior Art
During certain operative and therapeutic medical procedures it is necessary to position the patient, or selected portions of the patient's body, in specific orientations to facilitate performing the procedure or to minimize discomfort or possible injury to the patient. For example, when positioning a patient for thoracic surgery such as a robotic heart surgery procedure, stability of the patient is critical and requires the patient to be positioned at a stable angle of approximately 30 degrees, usually with the patient's right side elevated with respect to his or her left side. In some cases it is also necessary to perform some manipulation of the patient's elevated shoulder to allow the robotic trocars to move freely. As is known in the medical arts, a trocar is a surgical instrument having a cutting end with a three-sided blade and enclosed within a cannula (a small tube). The trocar may be used for manipulating or cauterizing tissue, and removing tissue and fluids. In other cases, stable anatomical support is needed to position the patient in a comfortable position even though the patient is required to remain immobile for an extended period of time. In many thoracic and orthopedic procedures, for example, correct support is needed for the patient's back and legs, respectively. In still other circumstances, such as certain obstetric procedures, a patient must be positioned so as to avoid pressure on certain internal organs or other structures.
Heretofore, patients have been positioned for thoracic or orthopedic surgery using improvised devices such as air bags, intravenous (IV) fluid bags, rolled-up sheets, and the like. These devices have proved to be unreliable in practice. For example, the air bags and the IV fluid bags run the inherent risk of leakage or rupture during the procedure. Such failure can cause an abrupt change in the position or orientation of the patient with possible catastrophic results. Further, none of the above improvised devices provide correct anatomical support of both the lower back and the upper back as required when performing thoracic surgery procedures. Moreover, in order to correctly position the patient using improvised devices, operating room personnel must spend too much time adjusting and maneuvering these devices during the critical pre-incision period, increasing the risk to the anesthetized patient due to prolonging the anesthesia and to the uncertain stability. Such delays decrease the productivity for surgeons, anesthesiologists, other operating room personnel, and in some cases, support personnel. Another shortcoming of improvised devices is that pressure exerted by the devices may result in discomfort or injury because the pressure is not evenly distributed, is not properly located, or the device shifts position during the procedure. Further, when using improvised devices it is difficult to avoid pressure points that may cause burns when used with heating pads between the patient's body and the positioning device.
In an effort to overcome the deficiencies of improvised devices, a number of prior art pads, pillows, supports, positioners, etc. have been devised, some of them with specific shapes adapted to specific procedures. Such devices tend to be limited to specific uses for which they were constructed, requiring a number of variations to be inventoried or made available to satisfy a variety of conditions, in turn requiring substantial storage space and handling procedures. Others require the use of a plurality of devices in combinations to achieve the desired support, but have the disadvantage that the combination lacks the needed stability or is unable to maintain the correct anatomical support for long periods.
What is needed, therefore, is a device that optimizes the shape requirements of thoracic, abdominal, and orthopedic procedures with a single anatomical support device, is readily adaptable or configurable to minor variations in patient's bodies or medical procedures, and reliably provides the stability needed during critical robotic procedures and other operative and therapeutic procedures.
Accordingly there is disclosed a device for providing anatomical support during operative or therapeutic procedures comprising a configurable bolster formed from a block of resilient synthetic foam material having a top reference surface and respective length, width, and height dimensions, and a plurality of recessed regions formed in the top reference surface of the configurable bolster and extending into selected portions of the bolster for accommodating particular anatomical structures. Precut slits may be provided extending vertically upward from the bottom surface of the bolster to enable removal of material from the bolster to adapt it to particular circumstances of use.
In another aspect, there is disclosed a device for providing anatomical support during operative or therapeutic procedures comprising: a configurable bolster formed from a block of resilient synthetic foam material having a top reference surface and respective length, width, and height dimensions before being formed, and further having: a first recessed portion of the top reference surface configured by a first beveled region sloping downward from a longitudinal centerline of the top surface of the bolster and descending laterally across a first half of the width dimension to and along a first side of the bolster; a second recessed portion of the reference surface configured as a concave relief sloping longitudinally downward from a first intermediate boundary of the top surface to a first end of the bolster and laterally downward from an intersection of the second recessed portion with the first beveled region to a second side of the bolster; and a third recessed portion of the reference surface configured by a second beveled region sloping downward, descending across the second half of the width dimension from approximately a second intermediate boundary of the top surface to a second end of the bolster.
In another aspect, precut slits are provided extending vertically upward from the bottom surface of the bolster to enable removal of material from the bolster to adapt it to particular circumstances of use.
Referring to
The present invention is not intended to be limited to the one illustrated; rather the one described herein is provided to show one example of a configurable bolster and its uses. Among, but not limited to, the operative procedures that may employ the configurable bolster to advantage are robotic heart surgery (e.g., mitral valve replacement), thoracotomies, thoracoscopies, radical and modified mastectomies, breast biopsies, skin grafting, kidney procedures, and orthopedic procedures involving knee surgery, fractured ankles, etc. The bolster described herein has also been found to be useful during abdominal procedures on pregnant patients to prevent compression of the patient's aorta (a condition called aorta-caval congestion) when the patient prefers to be supine. Although the bolster may be fashioned of reusable materials, the preferred embodiment of the invention is intended to be disposable, for single use only.
A configurable bolster 10 is shown in
For example, the more dense version may also be recommended for use with pregnant women, or to provide greater stability when the bolster is in place. In another example, the less dense version may be more suitable for patients that must be propped up off their back for limited periods. In either version, the density specification is chosen to provide a relatively firm bolster that has adequate stability to maintain its position while the operative or recovery procedure(s) are being performed. With either density, however, the use of the bolster will be determined by the physician and tailored to the particular patient and the specific procedure. For example, with older patients having skin that is less robust than usual, nurses may be instructed to turn the patient frequently—e.g., every two hours—to prevent “decubitus,” a breakdown of the skin caused by prolonged or excess pressure at bony regions of the patient's body such as the scapula, hip bones, or coccyx. In such cases the softer density version may be prescribed.
In fabricating the bolster 12, it may be cut from the rectangular block using hot knives, hot wire cutting apparatus or other suitable tool. In this illustrative example, the rectangular block of resilient foam may be preferably precut to the approximate length (L) 18, width (W) 20, and height (H) 22 dimensions before being shaped to the specified shape. Further, the dimensions selected for the embodiment illustrated are those that accommodate a patient of average size and weight. The proportions and contours, and the durometer of the foam material utilized, of the bolster to be described may readily be scaled for use with much larger or much smaller patients. Alternatively, the bolster 12 may be molded in the shape illustrated by molding processes well known in the art. In an alternate embodiment suited for some applications, the shaped bolster 12 may be covered with a permanent or temporary covering of cloth, vinyl, or other plastic material.
Continuing with
The first (or lateral) recessed portion 26 of the bolster 12 may be configured as a first beveled region (a descriptive name for the first recessed portion 26, which may be used interchangeably therewith) that slopes downward from the longitudinal centerline 24, forming a first inner edge 24A of the top surface 16 there along, and descends laterally downward across a first half of the width 20 of the bolster 12 to intersect with the first side 32 of the bolster 12. The second (or scapular) recessed portion 28 of the bolster 12 may be configured as a concave relief region (a descriptive name for the second recessed portion 28, which may be used interchangeably therewith) that slopes longitudinally downward from a first intermediate line 56, forming a second inner edge 56A of the top surface 16, that is disposed in the plane of the top surface, that intersects the longitudinal centerline 24 at a right angle, and that is located approximately six (6) inches from and parallel to the first end 34 of the bolster and ten (10) inches from the second end 38 of the bolster 12. The second recessed portion 28 slopes with a downward curve toward the first end 34 and toward the second side 36 of the bolster 12, thereby providing the concave profile shown in
The third recessed portion 30 of the bolster 12 may be configured as a second beveled region (a descriptive name for the third recessed portion 30, which may be used interchangeably therewith) that slopes downward from a second intermediate line 70, forming a third inner edge 70A along the top surface 16, and descends longitudinally downward across the second half of the width 20 of the bolster 12 to intersect with the second end of the bolster 12. In the foregoing, the second intermediate line 70 is disposed in the plane of the top surface, intersects the longitudinal centerline 24 at a right angle, and is located approximately thirteen (13) inches from and parallel to the first end 34 of the bolster and three (3) inches from the second end 38 of the bolster 12 at the third inner edge 70A of the top surface 16. Thus, the length of the bolster 12 between the second intermediate line 70 and the second end 38 of the bolster, in the illustrated example, defines a segment that is three-sixteenths (0.1875) of the total length L (18) of the bolster 12, or, by rounding off, approximately 0.200 times or one-fifth of the total length L (18) of the bolster 12.
Continuing with
Referring to
In use, the bolster 12 is placed so that the patient's spine 104 is aligned substantially above and along the longitudinal center line (24 in
Referring to
The bolster 12, shown partially in phantom, is placed on the top of the operating table 100 and under the right side of the patient 102 to elevate the right side of the torso of the patient 102. The amount of elevation may vary, but in a typical procedure such as robotic heart surgery, the patient's torso may be tilted approximately 30 degrees. The position of the body of the patient 102 is facilitated by the profile of the bolster 12, as described in the detailed description of
Referring to
In use, the bolster 12 is placed so that the patient's spine 104 (not shown in
While the invention has been shown in only one of its forms, it is not thus limited but is susceptible to various changes and modifications without departing from the spirit thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2234506 | Sistig | Mar 1941 | A |
2314080 | Dine et al. | Mar 1943 | A |
2521530 | McGuffage et al. | Sep 1950 | A |
3604023 | Lynch | Sep 1971 | A |
3931654 | Spann | Jan 1976 | A |
3938205 | Spann | Feb 1976 | A |
4185813 | Spann | Jan 1980 | A |
4233700 | Spann | Nov 1980 | A |
4471952 | Spann | Sep 1984 | A |
4482138 | Spann | Nov 1984 | A |
4752064 | Voss | Jun 1988 | A |
4840362 | Bremer et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4969222 | Serola | Nov 1990 | A |
5014375 | Coonrad et al. | May 1991 | A |
5097847 | Mikhail et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5131106 | Jackson | Jul 1992 | A |
5454993 | Kostich | Oct 1995 | A |
5467782 | Wiseman | Nov 1995 | A |
5566682 | Yavitz | Oct 1996 | A |
D387167 | Klein | Dec 1997 | S |
D396373 | Reale | Jul 1998 | S |
6032669 | Klein | Mar 2000 | A |
6047419 | Ferguson | Apr 2000 | A |
6357066 | Pierce | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6446288 | Pi | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6553995 | Cole et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6557197 | Graham | May 2003 | B1 |
6561194 | Michelson | May 2003 | B2 |
6625831 | Laughlin | Sep 2003 | B2 |
20030159699 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060278237 A1 | Dec 2006 | US |