This invention relates to a configurable clock network for a programmable logic device. More particularly, this invention relates to a clock network that allows each of several clocks to be configurably routed to different portions of a programmable logic device.
High-speed serial signaling is becoming an increasingly important form of signaling between electronic devices. For example, Low Voltage Differential Signaling (“LVDS”) has become a common form of signaling. Typically the data represent bytes of information that are being transmitted one after another. The usual definition of a byte is eight bits, but as used herein “byte” can refer to any plural number of bits such as eight bits, nine bits, ten bits, eleven bits, or fewer or more than these numbers of bits. When the data are received, one task that the receiving circuitry must typically perform is to find the boundaries between the successive bytes in the received serial bit stream. This may be referred to as “byte alignment” or “byte synchronization”.
In order to accommodate the use of high-speed serial signaling, electronic devices using such signaling must provide accurate high-speed clocks, which typically are provided using a loop circuit—i.e., a phase-locked loop (“PLL”) or a delay-locked loop (“DLL”). Typically, there is more than one high-speed serial channel on each device, and just as typically each loop circuit supplies the clock for more than one channel. The clock is used for serialization/deserialization, as well as for the above-described byte alignment process. Because of skew across the channels, the clock may be provided in a number of equally-distributed phases (i.e., each phase separated from its neighbors by the same phase angle—e.g., 45° of, phase in the case of eight clock phases), and dynamic phase alignment (“DPA”) circuitry may be provided in each channel to select the correct phase of the clock to account for skew and keep the data properly aligned with the clock, particularly in the byte alignment portion of each channel's serial data interface.
Programmable logic devices (“PLDs”) are well known as shown, for example, by such references as Cliff et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,689,195, Cliff et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,909,126, Jefferson et al. U.S. Pat. No. 6,215,326, and Ngai et al. U.S. Pat. No. 6,407,576. In general, a PLD is a general-purpose integrated circuit device that is programmable to perform any of a wide range of logic tasks. Rather than having to design and build separate logic circuits for performing different logic tasks, general-purpose PLDs can be programmed in various different ways to perform those various logic tasks. Many manufacturers of electronic circuitry and systems find PLDs to be an advantageous way to provide various components of what they need to produce.
It is known to use high-speed serial signaling with PLDs. PLDs designed for use with high-speed serial signaling typically include, in their input/output circuitry, programmable interfaces that can be used with one or more high-speed serial protocols, with the ability to programmably select the portions of the circuitry for a particular protocol. Similarly, multiple high-speed clock sources could be provided on the PLD, so that different ones of the programmable interfaces could operate at different clock speeds. However, heretofore the flexibility to assign a particular clock source to a particular channel was limited. For example, in one implementation, each channel is assigned to a particular clock source; in such a case, while different clock speeds are available, the user is constrained as to which channels can be used at which speeds. In another implementation, a plurality of clock buses could be provided to make each clock source available to each channel, with suitable multiplexing provided to connect each channel to the desired clock bus. The latter implementation requires a number of clock buses equal to the number of clock sources, as well as a plurality of—e.g., eight—multiplexers (each clock signal actually may be eight signals as described above) per channel per bus, imposing a high chip area cost. This latter implementation also has a high power cost unless provision is made to power down unused buses, and in some user implementations there may not be any unused buses—if even one channel uses a particular clock source, then the entire bus for that clock source must be powered up.
It would be desirable to be able to provide a programmable logic device having a clock network that allows the distribution of a plurality of clocks to a plurality of serial data channels without excessive area or power cost.
The present invention allows the distribution of a plurality of clocks to serial data channels without excessive area or power cost by providing a segmented clock bus to which all of the available clocks may be connected. Different segments of the bus may be connectable to different clocks, or the entire bus may be connected to one clock.
Thus, if more than one clock is being provided, then as long as each serial data channel is located near a segment on which the particular clock that it requires is provided, all channels can receive the correct clocks. Because only one bus is used, it is not necessary to consume area or power with multiple buses, although some additional circuitry will be required to achieve the bus segmentation and to allow the various clocks to be selectively connected to the bus. Although the user may be constrained when programming the device to place all channels requiring a particular clock near one another—or, more particularly, near the segment of the bus carrying that particular clock—the user has much greater flexibility in deciding which channels will use which clocks than in an arrangement where groups of channels are dedicated to particular clocks. And although the user may have less flexibility than in an implementation where a separate bus if provided for each clock to allow any channel to access any bus, the present invention has much lower power and chip area costs than in such a multiple bus limitation.
In accordance with this invention, there is provided a clock distribution network for use in a programmable logic device where the programmable logic device has a first number of serial data channels, and a second number of clock sources. The clock distribution network includes a clock bus having a plurality of bus segments for distributing clock signals to those channels, with each channel being connected to one of the bus segments. At each junction between adjacent bus segments, there is a respective programmable connection between those adjacent bus segments. A number of controllable inputs are provided, with each of the controllable inputs selectably connecting one of the clock sources to one of the segments of the clock bus.
This arrangement allows the bus segments to be connected, or not connected, in such a way as to allow the desired number of different clock sources to be connected to a desired number of different bus segments. Thus, if a user wants to use only one clock for all channels, then the respective programmable connections can all be turned on, creating one continuous clock bus, and one of the controllable inputs can be used to connect that single continuous clock bus to the desired clock source. Alternatively, the respective programmable connections can be turned off to create a number of individual clock buses equal to the number of available clock sources, and suitable ones of the controllable inputs can be turned on the connect the respective individual clock sources to the respective clock bus segments.
It will be understood, that between those extreme cases, a user may elect to turn on only some of the programmable connections to create more than one clock bus, but fewer clock buses than the number of clock bus segments. It will further be understood that preferably the various individual clock sources will be placed near different ones of the bus segments so that, as to each clock source, it may be connected to the bus segment to which it is adjacent if that bus segment is not connected to other bus segments, but at the same time may be connected to a larger bus including the bus segment to which it is adjacent (and which may include all, or fewer than all, of the available bus segments as described above).
The above and other advantages of the invention will be apparent upon consideration of the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference characters refer to like parts throughout, and in which:
The invention will now be described with reference to
It should be noted that
As seen in
The traces 243 shown in arrangement 240 are not to scale. Preferably, arrangement 240 is matched and balanced, so that each of the plurality of conductors (not shown) making up, a trace 243 (to carry the multiple clock phases discussed above) is the same length, so that skew does not develop as among the various phases and they remain in their predetermined—preferably equiangular—phase relationship. It is not necessary that one of traces 243 connecting, e.g., clock source 22 to clock distribution network portion 20 be the same length as that one of traces 243 connecting that clock source to clock distribution network portion 21, as long as each of the conductors within each respective trace 243 is the same length as each other conductor in that respective trace. However, because it is possible that that clock source may be connected simultaneously to both clock distribution network portions 20, 21, the difference, if any, in length between that one of traces 243 connecting, e.g., clock source 22 to clock distribution network portion 20, and that one of traces 243 connecting, e.g., clock source 22 to clock distribution network portion 21, preferably should be equivalent to a multiple of the phase angle difference between adjacent phases of that clock, so that aligned with each clock phase available in clock distribution network portion 20 is a clock phase available in clock distribution network portion 21, even if it is not present on the corresponding conductor (the phase alignment circuitry in each input/output channel 120 will select the correct phase).
Preferably, in this embodiment there are also two additional clock sources 24, 25 located at the respective opposite ends of clock distribution network portions 20, 21. Respective tristatable elements 26, 27 preferably are provided to isolate each respective clock source 24, 25 from respective clock distribution network portion 20, 21 if respective clock source 24, 25 is not being used. In
Using multiplexers instead of tristatable buffers for this purpose would be particularly advantageous, as long as the multiplexer is tristatable, when still other additional clock sources (not shown) are provided, to provide an option to connect one of those additional clock sources to respective clock distribution network portion 20, 21 in place of clock 24, 25, in which case the additional multiplexer inputs would be connected to the additional clock sources. It will be understood that while in
In the embodiment shown in
Because the tristatable buffers 200 are located at every fourth channel 220 in the embodiment shown in
It can be seen that in
In the third, fourth and fifth configurations referred to in the previous paragraph, any segmentation of a clock distribution network portion 20, 21 would have to occur at the location one of the tristatable buffers 200. Thus, in embodiment 13, the smallest possible bus segment that could be created would be four channels long, either at the end closest to clock sources 22, 23, or at the end closest to a respective one of clock sources 24, 25, and the length of a bus segment would have to be a multiple of four channels (plus one additional channel in the segment closer to clock sources 22, 23). On the other hand, in those same configurations in embodiment 33, while segmentation of a clock distribution network portion 30, 31 still would have to occur at the location one of the tristatable buffers 200, those locations are at every channel 220. Therefore, the smallest possible bus segment that could be created would be one channel long. The location of that one-channel-long bus still would be limited to either the end closest to clock sources 22, 23, or the end closest to a respective one of clock sources 24, 25. However, the bus segments could be any length.
Tristatable buffers 200 may be any suitable tristatable bidirectional buffer, as are known to those of ordinary skill in the art. Preferably, each tristatable buffer 200 can be controlled or programmed to pass signals in either or both directions, or to block signals in both directions. It should be noted that in the embodiments of
In addition, it may be desirable to prevent the disconnected clock conductors in such a skipped zone from floating, and to force such conductors to a known state to prevent unnecessary power consumption. Therefore, each tristatable buffer 200 preferably includes circuitry (not shown) to connect a disconnected clock conductor to a fixed voltage supply. Such circuitry may be a simple transistor or passgate (not shown) that can be turned on when tristatable buffer 200 is tristated. In one embodiment, such a passgate would be provided on each end of tristatable buffer 200, so that regardless of which side of tristatable buffer 200 the disconnected clock conductor segment was on, that clock conductor segment could be driven to a known state. Alternatively, because the disconnected clock conductor segment would be bracketed by two tristatable buffers 200, the passgate could be provided at only one end of each tristatable buffer 200, as long as all tristatable buffers 200 would always be oriented in the same direction (e.g., always away from central clock sources 22, 23).
In
In the examples of
A simplified embodiment 43 of a clock distribution network in accordance with the present invention, having portions 40, 41 corresponding to portions 20, 21 or 30, 31, is shown in
As in the embodiments of
Thus it can be seen that in accordance with the present invention, a single bus can be used to conduct multiple clock sources to different channels. Because each of these sources is actually, as discussed above, multiple (e.g., eight) phases of a single clock, the invention provides a significant savings in the number of bus conductors that must be provided (e.g., a savings of eight conductors multiplied by the number of clock sources beyond one source).
PLD 10 according to the present invention, incorporating the clock distribution network 13, 33, 43 described above, may be used as part of a data processing system 900 shown in
System 900 can be used in a wide variety of applications, such as computer networking, data networking, instrumentation, video processing, digital signal processing, or any other application where the advantage of using programmable or reprogrammable logic is desirable. PLD 10 can be used to perform a variety of different logic functions. For example, PLD 10 can be configured as a processor or controller that works in cooperation with processor 901. PLD 10 may also be used as an arbiter for arbitrating access to a shared resources in system 900. In yet another example, PLD 10 can be configured as an interface between processor 901 and one of the other components in system 900. It should be noted that system 900 is only exemplary, and that the true scope and spirit of the invention should be indicated by the following claims.
Various technologies can be used to implement PLDs 10 as described above and incorporating this invention.
It will be understood that the foregoing is only illustrative of the principles of the invention, and that various modifications can be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention, and the present invention is limited only by the claims that follow.
This is a continuation of commonly-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/282,876, filed Nov. 17, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,286,007, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/830,562, filed Apr. 22, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,075,365.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3473160 | Wahlstrom | Oct 1969 | A |
3997874 | Kelly et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4494021 | Bell et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4542509 | Buchanan et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4633488 | Shaw | Dec 1986 | A |
4658152 | Walters | Apr 1987 | A |
4719593 | Threewitt et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4857866 | Tateishi | Aug 1989 | A |
4868522 | Popat et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4959646 | Podkowa et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5072195 | Graham et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5075575 | Shizukuishi et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5079519 | Ashby et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5121014 | Huang | Jun 1992 | A |
5133064 | Hotta et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5204555 | Graham et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5208557 | Kersh | May 1993 | A |
5239213 | Norman et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5349544 | Wright et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5394116 | Kasturia | Feb 1995 | A |
5397943 | West et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5418499 | Nakao | May 1995 | A |
5420544 | Ishibashi | May 1995 | A |
5424687 | Fukuda | Jun 1995 | A |
5448191 | Meyer | Sep 1995 | A |
5477182 | Huizer | Dec 1995 | A |
5506878 | Chiang | Apr 1996 | A |
5535240 | Carney et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5542083 | Hotta et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5581214 | Iga | Dec 1996 | A |
5586307 | Wong et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5629651 | Mizuni | May 1997 | A |
5642082 | Jefferson | Jun 1997 | A |
5646564 | Erickson et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5656959 | Chang et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5691669 | Tsai et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5699020 | Jefferson | Dec 1997 | A |
5742180 | DeHon et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5744991 | Jefferson et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
RE35797 | Graham et al. | May 1998 | E |
5777360 | Rostoker et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5815016 | Erickson | Sep 1998 | A |
5847617 | Reddy et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5852728 | Matsuda et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5889436 | Yeung et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5900757 | Aggarwal et al. | May 1999 | A |
5952891 | Boudry | Sep 1999 | A |
5963069 | Jefferson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5970110 | Li | Oct 1999 | A |
5974105 | Wang et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5987543 | Smith | Nov 1999 | A |
5999025 | New | Dec 1999 | A |
6014048 | Talaga, Jr. et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6020931 | Bilbrey et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6043677 | Albu et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6058117 | Ennamarato et al. | May 2000 | A |
6069506 | Miller | May 2000 | A |
6069507 | Shen et al. | May 2000 | A |
6072348 | New et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6081022 | Mitra et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6104222 | Embree | Aug 2000 | A |
6107946 | Jeong | Aug 2000 | A |
6114915 | Huang et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125217 | Paniccia et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125421 | Roy | Sep 2000 | A |
6127865 | Jefferson | Oct 2000 | A |
6141394 | Linebarger et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144224 | Lee et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6144242 | Jeong et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6144675 | Wakabayashi et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157266 | Tsai et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6188699 | Lang et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195758 | Lundh et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6229861 | Young | May 2001 | B1 |
6249189 | Wu et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252419 | Sung et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6278332 | Nelson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6311313 | Camporese et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6320469 | Friedberg et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6326812 | Jefferson | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6359483 | Watkins et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6369624 | Wang et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373278 | Sung et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6411150 | Williams | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6462623 | Horan et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463547 | Bailey et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6483886 | Sung et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6504415 | Robinson et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6650161 | Thomas et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6690195 | Ngai et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6730540 | Siniaguine | May 2004 | B2 |
6836877 | Dupenloup | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6862548 | Chan | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6924678 | Starr | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7242229 | Starr et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7304507 | Tran et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
20010033188 | Aung et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20050080580 | Kantake | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20070018863 | Hoang et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 266 065 | May 1988 | EP |
0 416 930 | Mar 1991 | EP |
0 501 652 | Sep 1992 | EP |
0 657 797 | Jun 1995 | EP |
0 778 517 | Jun 1997 | EP |
0 903 660 | Mar 1999 | EP |
0 987 822 | Mar 2000 | EP |
1 056 207 | Nov 2000 | EP |
0 657 797 | Jul 2003 | EP |
1-137646 | May 1989 | JP |
10215156 | Aug 1998 | JP |
WO 9110951 | Jul 1991 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11282876 | Nov 2005 | US |
Child | 11888336 | US | |
Parent | 10830562 | Apr 2004 | US |
Child | 11282876 | US |