A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
Web-based applications typically use a web browser to support execution. These web-based applications are required to be tested against their specified functionalities in order to verify that execution will proceed as intended. For large web-based applications that have many lines of code, automated testing is preferable, because automated testing saves substantial labor as compared to manual testing.
One example of an automated testing system is available under the trade name Selenium. Selenium is a portable software testing framework for web applications that provides a record/playback tool for authoring tests without learning a test scripting language. Selenium provides a test domain specific language (DSL) to write tests in a number of popular programming languages, including various versions of C, Java, Ruby, Groovy, Python, PHP, and Perl. Test playback is possible in most modern web browsers. Selenium deploys on Windows, Linux, and Macintosh platforms. Selenium is open source software released under the Apache 2.0 license and can be downloaded and used without charge.
Another tool used in conjunction with automated testing systems, such as Selenium is known as Jiffy-web, or Jiffy. Jiffy is advertised as a web page instrumentation and measurement suite that was first released in June of 2008. Combined these tools facilitate the testing of computer applications in an efficient manner. However, these tools fail to demonstrate the manner by which to implement the same for testing web-based computer network performance.
A need exists, therefore, to provide testing techniques for web-based computer network performance.
The present invention features methods, computer program products and apparatuses for measuring client-side computer system performance that features identifying one of a plurality of uniform resource locator addresses contained on a server computing system, with each of the uniform resource locator addresses being associated with computing resources. The computing resources associated with any one of the plurality of uniform resource locator addresses are different from the computer resource corresponding to the remaining uniform resource locator addresses. The computing resources are accessible through a web-browser that accesses the same computing resources associated with the one of the plurality of uniform resource locator addresses. Measured are metrics of the interactions between the web-browser and the computing resources associated with one of the plurality of uniform resource locator addresses. It is determined whether the metrics satisfy pre-determined operational requirements. These and other embodiments are discussed more fully below.
Referring to
A given application server of MTS may simultaneously process requests for a great number of users, and a given database table may store rows for a potentially much greater number of users. To that end, and as shown in
Architecture 12 provides access to a database 44 by multiple users 20, 22 and 24 of client side facilities 14 over data communication network 18 using standard computer systems (not shown). To that end, network interface resources 32 include a plurality of virtual portals 45-47. Each virtual portal 45-47 provides an “instance” of a portal user interface coupled to allow access to database 44. Typically, tenants obtain rights to store information, referred to as tenant information 48 and 50, on database 44 and make the same accessible to one or more users 20, 22 and 24 to whom the tenant provides authorization. This is typically achieved by rental agreements between the tenant and an owner/provider of architecture 12. In this manner, architecture 12 provides an on-demand database service to users 20, 22 and 24 that is not necessarily concerned with building and/or maintaining the database system; rather, these functions are addressed between the tenant and the owner/provider.
With architecture 12, multiple users 20, 22 and 24 may access database 44 through a common network address, in this example a universal resource locator (URL). In response, web-pages and other content may be provided to users 20, 22 and 24 over data communication network 18. The resources of database 44 that users 20, 22 and 24 may access can be different, depending on user's 20, 22 and 24 security or permission level and/or tenant association. As a result, data structures included in tenant information 48 and 50 are managed so as to be allocated at the tenant level, while other data structures might be managed at the user level. Because architecture 12 supports multiple tenants including possible competitors, security protocols 52 and other system software 54, stored for example on hard drive 38, maintain applications and applications' use to only those users 20, 22 and 24 with proper access rights. Also, because many tenants may desire access to architecture 12 rather than maintain their own system, redundancy, up-time, and backup are additional functions that may be implemented in architecture 12.
Referring to both
Referring to both
Referring to
Test configuration file 84 includes test configuration data 85 and environmental setup mechanism 86. Test configuration data 85 configures individual tests and includes metadata to facilitate execution of the test. Examples of the metadata that may be included in test configuration data 85 includes a universal resource locator (URL) address of WUT 88. This may be an explicit/static URL address or it may include information that a web application (not shown) may employ to derive the URL address at which the WUT 88 is located. Additionally, metadata may include environmental configuration information so that emulation 72 accurately mimics the interactions of architecture 12 with client side facilities 14. Metadata is also included identifying metrics that must be satisfied by the test, e.g., a failure threshold for events that occur on client-side facilities 14. One example of a failure threshold would be web-page loading time, i.e., whether WUT 88 is rendered upon browser 78 in a predetermined amount of time. The time is typically measured in milliseconds. Were the interactions of client side facilities 14 and architecture 12 to occur outside of the allotted time then the test would be reported as a failure. Other metadata that may be included in configurable test data 85 identifies the owner of the test, an e-mail or other electronic address to which a communication is transmitted indicating the results of the test, e.g., whether a failure had occurred; test case tags; logical grouping of test cases or any other associated metadata specific to a given test. Finally, the metadata in test configuration data 85 is provided to communicate to environmental setup mechanism 86. An example test configuration data 85 is as follows:
The test configuration data 85 recited above includes two test cases: testCase1 and testCase2. Typically, test configuration data 85 is stored on CTF 16 in extended markup language (XML) The first test case, testCase1, is directed to a static URL address for BTF 64. The second test case, testCase2 provides metadata that will be used by environment setup mechanism 86 to create a new CustomerObject and construct the URL address for that object's “edit” view. Both testCase1 and testCase2 pass named steps to environmental setup mechanism 86, “enableHomePage” and “enableCustomerObjects”, respectively. The metrics established by test configuration data 65 that WUT 88 must satisfy is that WUT 88 must be rendered by browser 78 in no greater than 200 ms.
Environmental setup mechanism 86 performs any desired web application pre-test setup of emulation 72. This may include configuration to accurately emulate a desired web server configuration; database population; and web application metadata configuration that may affect the generated content of the WUT 88. Environmental setup mechanism 86 essentially allocates the computer resources of CTF 16 that are accessible by browser 78 by virtue of it establishing emulation 72. As a result, the environmental configuration metadata included in test configuration data 85 determines which steps are performed by environmental setup mechanism 86. An example of environmental setup mechanism 86 is as follows:
As with the test configuration data 85, the environmental setup mechanism 66 is written in XML. This environmental setup mechanism 66 calls architecture 12 logic in Java. The Java code will perform to enable the specified features.
BTF 74 is also written in Java code to communicate with Selenium to opening the WUT in browser 78 determine the time to render WUT. An example of BTF Java code is as follows:
In short, the test case configuration data 85 provides a data access object (DAO) name and the name of a view for that object, e.g., “detail view”, “edit view”, etc. to environmental setup mechanism 86. Environmental setup mechanism 86 operates on the DAO to mimic, or create a mock instance, of the specified DAO and constructs a URL address to the DAO at the specified view. BTF 74 navigates to the constructed URL address gathers performance metrics on the generated page that represents a view of the DAO.
Included in WUT 88 is a client-side data provider 90 to measure the performance metrics. Client-side data provider 90 analyzes the actions of web browser 78 and generates reports concerning the same. One metric of interest is load time of WUT 88, representing the time taken for browser 78 to parse and render an HTML, used to define WUT 88, into a usable web page by browser 78. One manner in which to gather performance timings would involve comparing JavaScript timestamps at various points within client-side code. To that end, client side data provider 90 uses JavaScript to gather page load time and stores it in a table of measurement that may be retrieved by BTF 74. An example of client side data provider is Jiffy-web, or Jiffy. Jiffy is advertised as a web page instrumentation and measurement suite that was first released in June of 2008. Support for Jiffy is available from http://code.google.com/p/jiffy-web/wiki/Jiffy_js.
Also included in CTF 16 is a data storage and retrieval mechanism (DSRM) 92. DSRM 92 provides a persistent storage place for test case measurements and metadata, e.g., the time a particular test was performed, the version of browser 78, system hardware on which the test was run and the like. DSRM 70 may be stored as a plain text file on CTF 16 or architecture 12, or as any number of persistent databases like MySQL. DSRM 92 may also provide trending data in virtually any format, such as graph 72, shown in
Referring again to
The Computer code for operating and configuring network 10 to intercommunicate and to process web pages, applications and other data and media content as described herein is preferably downloaded and stored on a hard disk, but the entire program code, or portions thereof, may also be stored in any other volatile or non-volatile memory medium or device as is well known, such as a ROM or RAM, or provided on any media capable of storing program code, such as any type of rotating media including floppy disks, optical discs, digital versatile disk (DVD), compact disk (CD), microdrive, and magneto-optical disks, and magnetic or optical cards, nanosystems (including molecular memory ICs), or any type of media or device suitable for storing instructions and/or data. Additionally, the entire program code, or portions thereof, may be transmitted and downloaded from a software source over a transmission medium, e.g., over the Internet, or from another server, as is well known, or transmitted over any other conventional network connection as is well known (e.g., extranet, VPN, LAN, etc.) using any communication medium and protocols (e.g., TCP/IP, HTTP, HTTPS, Ethernet, etc.) as are well known. It will also be appreciated that computer code for implementing embodiments of the present invention can be implemented in any programming language that can be executed on a client system and/or server or server system such as, for example, C, C++, HTML, any other markup language, Java™, JavaScript, ActiveX, any other scripting language, such as VBScript, and many other programming languages as are well known may be used. (Java™ is a trademark of Sun Microsystems, Inc.). Therefore, the scope of the appended claims should be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and similar arrangements.
The present application claims priority to U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/330,838 filed May 3, 2010, entitled CONFIGURABLE FRAME WORK FOR TESTING AND ANALYSIS OF CLIENT-SIDE WEB BROWSER PAGE PERFORMANCE and identifying James Troup as inventor. This aforementioned patent application is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5072370 | Durdik | Dec 1991 | A |
5577188 | Zhu | Nov 1996 | A |
5608872 | Schwartz et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5649104 | Carleton et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5715450 | Ambrose et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5761419 | Schwartz et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5787437 | Potterveld et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5794232 | Mahlum et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5819038 | Carleton et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5821937 | Tonelli et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5831610 | Tonelli et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5873096 | Lim et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5918159 | Fomukong et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5941947 | Brown et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5950190 | Yeager et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963953 | Cram et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974409 | Sanu et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974453 | Andersen et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5987471 | Bodine et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6064656 | Angal et al. | May 2000 | A |
6085191 | Fisher et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6092083 | Brodersen et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6112198 | Lohman et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6169534 | Raffel et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178425 | Brodersen et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6189000 | Gwertzman et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6189011 | Lim et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6216135 | Brodersen et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219667 | Lu et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226641 | Hickson et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233617 | Rothwein et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233618 | Shannon | May 2001 | B1 |
6256671 | Strentzsch et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266669 | Brodersen et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6295530 | Ritchie et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6324568 | Diec | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324693 | Brodersen et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330560 | Harrison et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6336137 | Lee et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6341288 | Yach et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345288 | Reed et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
D454139 | Feldcamp et al. | Mar 2002 | S |
6367077 | Brodersen et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6393605 | Loomans | May 2002 | B1 |
6405220 | Brodersen et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411998 | Bryant et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6425003 | Herzog et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434550 | Warner et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438562 | Gupta et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446089 | Brodersen et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6446109 | Gupta | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6453038 | McFarlane et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6535909 | Rust | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6549908 | Loomans | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553563 | Ambrose et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6560461 | Fomukong et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6574635 | Stauber et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6577726 | Huang et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6578037 | Wong et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6601087 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6604117 | Lim et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6604128 | Diec | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6609148 | Salo et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6609150 | Lee et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6621834 | Scherpbier et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6654032 | Zhu et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6658417 | Statukis et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665648 | Brodersen et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6665655 | Warner et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6684438 | Brodersen et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6711565 | Subramaniam et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6721765 | Ghosh et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6724399 | Katchour et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728702 | Subramaniam et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728960 | Loomans | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6732095 | Warshavsky et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6732100 | Brodersen et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6732111 | Brodersen et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6754681 | Brodersen et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6763351 | Subramaniam et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6763501 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6768904 | Kim | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6782383 | Subramaniam et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6804330 | Jones et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6826565 | Ritchie et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6826582 | Chatterjee et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6826745 | Coker | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6829655 | Huang et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6839680 | Liu et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6842748 | Warner et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6850895 | Brodersen et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6850949 | Warner et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6944133 | Wisner et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6947927 | Chaudhuri et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7072935 | Kehoe et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7076633 | Tormasov et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7152109 | Suorsa et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7174483 | Becher et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7185192 | Kahn | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7206805 | McLaughlin, Jr. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7206807 | Cheenath | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7209929 | Dominguez, Jr. et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7249118 | Sandler et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7305577 | Zhang | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7308704 | Vogel et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7340411 | Cook | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7350237 | Vogel et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7373364 | Chapman | May 2008 | B1 |
7448079 | Tremain | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7484219 | Mitra | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7529728 | Weissman et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7577092 | San Andres et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7580975 | Cheenath | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7599953 | Galindo-Legaria et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7620655 | Larsson et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7661027 | Langen et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7693820 | Larson et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7698160 | Beaven et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7734608 | Fell et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7769825 | Karakashian et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7774366 | Fisher et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7779039 | Weissman et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7814052 | Bezar et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7814470 | Mamou et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7827138 | Salmon et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7849401 | Elsa et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8069194 | Manber et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8082301 | Ahlgren et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8095413 | Beaven | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8095594 | Beaven et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8275836 | Beaven et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
20010023440 | Franklin et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010044791 | Richter et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020072951 | Lee et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082892 | Raffel | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020129352 | Brodersen et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133392 | Angel et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140731 | Subramaniam et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020143931 | Smith et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020143997 | Huang et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020162090 | Parnell et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165742 | Robbins | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030004971 | Gong | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018705 | Chen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018830 | Chen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030066031 | Laane et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030066032 | Ramachandran et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069936 | Warner et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030070000 | Coker et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030070004 | Mukundan et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030070005 | Mukundan et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074418 | Coker et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030120675 | Stauber et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030151633 | George et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030159136 | Huang et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030187921 | Diec et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030189600 | Gune et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204427 | Gune et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030206192 | Chen et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030225730 | Warner et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040001092 | Rothwein et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010489 | Rio et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015578 | Karakashian et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015981 | Coker et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040027388 | Berg et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044656 | Cheenath | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040045004 | Cheenath | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040111410 | Burgoon et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128001 | Levin et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040186860 | Lee et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193510 | Catahan et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199489 | Barnes-Leon et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040199536 | Barnes Leon et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040199543 | Braud et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220952 | Cheenath | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040249854 | Barnes-Leon et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260534 | Pak et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260659 | Chan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268299 | Lei et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010578 | Doshi | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050050555 | Exley et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050091098 | Brodersen et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050216342 | Ashbaugh | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050283478 | Choi et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060095960 | Arregoces et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060100912 | Kumar et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060136382 | Dettinger et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060248372 | Aggarwal et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070078705 | Abels et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088741 | Brooks et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070115845 | Hochwarth et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124276 | Weissman et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130130 | Chan et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070130137 | Oliver et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150546 | Karakashian et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070226640 | Holbrook et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070254635 | Montelius | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080010243 | Weissman et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080082540 | Weissman et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080082572 | Ballard et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080082986 | Cheenath et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086358 | Doshi et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086447 | Weissman et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086479 | Fry et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086482 | Weissman et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086514 | Weissman et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086567 | Langen et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086735 | Cheenath et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080114875 | Anastas et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080127092 | Tomar | May 2008 | A1 |
20080162544 | Weissman et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080201701 | Hofhansel et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215560 | Bell et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080225760 | Iyer et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080270354 | Weissman et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080270987 | Weissman et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090030906 | Doshi et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090049065 | Weissman et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090049101 | Weissman et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090049102 | Weissman et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090049288 | Weissman et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090193521 | Matsushima et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090276395 | Weissman et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090276405 | Weissman et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090282045 | Hsieh et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090287791 | Mackey | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090319529 | Bartlett et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100020715 | Monaco et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100191719 | Weissman et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100205216 | Durdik | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211619 | Weissman et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100223284 | Brooks et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235837 | Weissman et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100274779 | Weissman et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110162025 | Kellerman et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2004059420 | Jul 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
(Steven Sanderson's blog, First steps with Lightweight Test Automation Framework, Mar. 27, 2009, retrieved from http://blog.stevensanderson.com/2009/03/27/first-steps-with-lightweight-test-automation-framework/, pp. 1-9). |
[Online]; [published on Oct. 17, 2008]; [retrieved on Feb. 26, 2010]; retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Push—technology. |
[Online]; [published on Oct. 16, 2008]; [retrieved on Feb. 26, 2010]; retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Customer—Relationship—Management. |
[Online]; [published on Apr. 22, 2008]; [retrieved on Feb. 26, 2010]; retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat—file—database. |
[Online]; [published on Apr. 25, 2008]; [retrieved on Feb. 26, 2010]; retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relational—database. |
First named inventor: Yancey, Scott, U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,658, filed Dec. 11, 2009. |
First named inventor: Yancey, Scott, U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,675, filed Dec. 11, 2009. |
First named inventor: Doshi, Kedar, U.S. Appl. No. 12/167,991, filed Jul. 3, 2008. |
First named inventor: Bezar, Eric, U.S. Appl. No. 12/569,603, filed Sep. 2, 2010. |
First named inventor: Yancey, Scott, U.S. Appl. No. 12/132,409, filed Jun. 3, 2008. |
First named inventor: Durdik, Paul, U.S. Appl. No. 12/549,349, filed Aug. 27, 2009. |
Lee et al: “Composition of executable business process models by combining business rules and process flows”, Expert Systems With Application, Oxford, GB, vol. 33, No. 1, Dec. 22, 2006, pp. 221-229. |
Mietzer et al: “Combining Different Multi-tenancy Patterns in Service Oriented Applications”, IEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, NJ, USA, Sep. 1, 2009, pp. 131-140. |
Wang et al: “Integrated Constraint Violation Handling for Dynamic Services Composition”, IEE International Conference on Services Computing, NJ, USA, Sep. 21, 2009, pp. 168-175. |
Wermelinger et al: “Using coordination contracts for flexible adaptation to changing business rules”, Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Software Evolution, NJ, USA, Sep. 1, 2003, pp. 115-120. |
Wang et al: “A Study and Performance Evaluation of the Multi-Tenant Data Tier Design Patterns for Service Oriented Computing”, IEE International Conference on E-Business Engineering, NJ, USA, Oct. 22, 2008, pp. 94-101. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration. International Application No. PCT/US2010/050021. International Filing Date: Sep. 23, 2010. |
First named inventor: Yancey, Scott, U.S. Appl. No. 12/197,979, filed Aug. 25, 2008. |
First named inventor: Calahan, Patrick, U.S. Appl. No. 12/954,556, filed Nov. 24, 2010. |
First named inventor: Pin, Olivier, U.S. Appl. No. 12/895,833, filed Sep. 30, 2010. |
First named inventor: Tanaka, Jay, U.S. Appl. No. 12/831,196, filed Jul. 6, 2010. |
First named inventor: Press, William A., U.S. Appl. No. 12/850,502, filed Aug. 4, 2010. |
First named inventor: Tanaka, Jay, U.S. Appl. No. 12/831,209, filed Jul. 6, 2010. |
First named inventor: Williams, Alexis, U.S. Appl. No. 13/028,236, filed Feb. 16, 2011. |
First named inventor: Varadharajan, Arunkumaran, U.S. Appl. No. 12/909,820, filed Oct. 21, 2010. |
First named inventor: Le Stum, Guillaume, U.S. Appl. No. 13/093,128, filed Apr. 25, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110270975 A1 | Nov 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61330838 | May 2010 | US |