The present invention relates to catheters such as feeding tubes and their placement in the body of a patient.
Numerous situations exist in which a body cavity needs to be catheterized to achieve a desired medical goal. One relatively common situation is to provide nutritional solutions or medicines directly into the stomach or intestines. A stoma is formed in the stomach or intestinal wall and a catheter is placed through the stoma. This surgical opening and/or the procedure to create the opening is commonly referred to as “gastrostomy”. Feeding solutions can be injected through the catheter to provide nutrients directly to the stomach or intestines (known as enteral feeding). A variety of different catheters intended for enteral feeding have been developed over the years, including some having a “low profile” relative to the portion of the catheter which sits on a patient's skin, as well as those having the more traditional or non-low profile configuration. These percutaneous transconduit catheters (sometimes referred to as “percutaneous transconduit tubes”) are frequently referred to as “gastrostomy catheters”, “percutaneous gastrostomy catheters”, “PEG catheters” or “enteral feeding catheters”. U.S. Pat. No. 6,019,746 for a “Low Profile Balloon Feeding Device” issued to Picha et al. on Feb. 1, 2000, provides an example of one device.
A problem universal to low profile and non-low profile enteral feeding devices or enteral feeding assemblies (e.g., gastrostomy tubes) is the difficulty in inserting a retainer in a body lumen to hold the enteral feeding assembly in a fixed position in the lumen. Balloons have been used, which are deflated for insertion through the stoma and then inflated to hold the enteral feeding assembly in position. While balloons have many advantages, balloon may eventually leak and deflate. Other retaining fixtures have been difficult to insert through a stoma, and often must be endoscopically placed by a physician, usually during a surgical procedure. These retaining fixtures are typically made of the same silicone composition used to make the enteral feeding device and are frequently molded as part of the device. The end which is inserted into a body lumen may have a Malecot tip consisting of three or four generally semicircular loops of material which radiate from the end of the tube and join at a tip. The radial loop sections can seat against the interior stomach wall so as to impede the inadvertent withdrawal of the tube. Liquid nutrient passes from the tube into the stomach through the openings between these semicircular loops. Examples of conventional devices with Malecot tips or similar expanding tips are found at, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,915,171 for “Gastrostomy Tube” issued to Shermeta; U.S. Pat. No. 4,315,513 for “Gastrostomy and Other Percutaneous Transport Tubes” issued to Nawash et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 4,944,732 for “Gastrostomy Port” issued to Russo; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,484,420 for “Retention Bolsters for Percutaneous Catheters” issued to Russo. Exemplary commercial products include the Passport® Low Profile Gastrostomy Device available from Cook Medical, Inc. of Bloomington, Ind. and the Mini One™ Non-Balloon Button available from Applied Medical Technology, Inc. of Brecksville, Ohio.
A shortcoming of these devices relates to the manner of insertion and withdrawal of a catheter or tube incorporating these retaining fixtures (e.g., a gastrostomy tube) into a body lumen such as into the stomach. As generally illustrated in
In practice, both the tube and the Malecot tip or similar expanding tip stretch which require providing much greater length of the article being inserted through a gastrostomy opening. This elongation of both the tube and the Malecot tip or similar expanding tip also makes withdrawal of the device more difficult because the stylet must be inserted further into the body. This presents difficulties for smaller patients, particularly for children and babies. In addition, much greater force is required to extend both the tube and the Malecot tip or similar expanding tip. The greater travel of the stylet into the body in combination with greater force applied to the stylet creates more potential for harm if the stylet is not aligned properly on the Malecot tip or similar expanding tip, if the stylet slips off the tip or if the tip fails and separates from the tube.
Accordingly, there is a need for an enteral feeding assembly and associated insertion device(s) which permits a user or health care provider to quickly and easily insert the assembly, including the retainer, externally through the patient's stoma and into a body lumen, such as, for example, a stomach lumen. Such an assembly and retainer are desirably configured so that during insertion, the retainer has an outer diameter which is about the same as the outer diameter of the portion of the catheter which extends into the stoma. However, after insertion, it is desirable that the outer diameter of the retainer expands to hold the enteral feeding assembly in the desired position for enteral feeding. Moreover, it is desirable to have a retainer that may be expanded in a body lumen without inflation. Finally, it is desirable that any devices used to insert, expand, contract, and/or remove the retainer be simple and easy to use.
In response to the difficulties and problems discussed herein, the present invention provides an innovative PEG device for placement in a gastric lumen, desirably under direct visualization using an endoscope. Since the stomach is a common example of a gastric lumen, for the purpose of describing the present invention, the use of the term “stomach” is representative of all other gastric lumens or spaces (e.g., duodenum, jejunum, ileum, etc.), unless otherwise specified.
According to the invention, the configurable PEG device (hereinafter referred to as a “C-PEG” or “C-PEG device”) includes a shaft having a first or distal end that is in-dwelling and a second or proximal end that resides outside the body of a patient. The shaft defines a lumen for passage of feeding solutions and/or medicine. The shaft includes an expandable retainer secured to a portion of the shaft (e.g., a distal end of the shaft or between the distal end and a middle section or a mid-point of the shaft for various longer length devices), the retainer having a deployed position and an insertion position. The C-PEG also includes a flexible sheath surrounding the expandable retainer, the sheath being generally loose around the retainer when the retainer is in an insertion position and the sheath being generally snug against an exterior surface of the retainer when the retainer is in a deployed position.
The CPEG incorporates a releasable lock for maintaining the expandable retainer in its deployed position. The releasable lock is located on the shaft in a position proximal to the expandable retainer. For example, the releasable lock may be located at or near the second end of the shaft.
In an aspect of the present invention, the expandable retainer alternates between: (a) an insertion/removal state in which the expandable retainer has a first length such that flexible struts, ribs and/or other elements of the retainer are substantially axially aligned with the exterior of the shaft to give an effective cross-sectional area that is substantially the same as that of the shaft, and (b) a deployed state in which the retainer has a second length that is shorter than the first length in which the flexible struts, ribs and/or other elements of the retainer have a deployed effective cross-sectional area with a diameter that is substantially greater than that of the shaft.
The expandable retainer is generally in the form of a hollow sleeve or flexible skeleton that has two opposing ends. This sleeve is desirably formed of a flexible plastic mesh, braided mesh-like material, net or network of material, and/or flexible flat ribs composed of one or more materials such as, for example, PET (polyethylene terephthatlate), PEEK (poly(ether-ether-ketone)) or nylon (various polyamides). A substantial portion of the exterior surface of the retainer is covered in a flexible sheath that allows unencumbered changes in retainer shapes and states as desired. The flexible sheath avoids in-growth of tissue, is non-permeable to liquid, and is generally non-compliant (i.e., the flexible sheath is desirably not stretchable like an elastic material) although it may be somewhat compliant or even elastic—provided it remains a separate component and does not generate forces that deform the expandable retainer when deployed. This flexible sheath may be attached at or towards each opposing end of the retainer to envelop at least a substantial portion of the retainer but not to embed within it. The flexible sheath may snugly conform to the retainer in the deployed state. The sheath prevents liquid from passing from the exterior of the retainer through the retainer when the sheath and retainer are properly assembled as part of the C-PEG.
The shaft has at least a first tube and a second tube that are arranged to form at least one effective lumen that spans the entire length of the shaft (i.e., the entire length of the C-PEG). The first tube is desirably concentric within or surrounded by the second tube. That is, the first tube is generally an inner tube and the second tube is an outer tube. The first and second tubes are configured to axially slide with respect to each other. Generally speaking, the first tube is longer than the second tube. The first tube and the second tube have respective proximal and distal ends that correspond to the proximal and distal orientation of the shaft. In an aspect of the invention, the overall length of the C-PEG is not significantly altered when the retainer alternates between the insertion and deployed states.
Generally speaking, a first end or end portion of the retainer is joined to the distal portion or end of the first or inner tube and a second end or end portion of the retainer sleeve is joined to a distal portion or end of the second or outer tube. When the retainer is in an insertion position (or in an un-deployed state), the first or inner tube generally extends a distance beyond the end of the second or outer tube such that the first end of the retainer is extended axially and the rest of the retainer is pulled inwardly against the first and second tubes such that the retainer assumes a tubular configuration.
When the retainer is in a deployed position, it is configured to have a hemispherical-, dome- or mushroom-type shape. Such a shape is generated by retracting the first or inner tube back into the second or outer tube. This axial movement inverts the flexible (e.g. mesh) material of the retainer sleeve onto itself to create a resilient retention bumper. In an aspect of the invention, this axial movement inverts a portion of the mesh or braided material or other flexible material of the retainer sleeve onto itself to create a flatter proximal profile that provides greater stabilization than rounded or funneled profiles found in conventional retainers. In an aspect of the invention, the deployed retainer may define at least one generally planar surface and at least one generally frustoconical surface and/or cylindrical surface. For example, one or more generally planar surfaces may be generally perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the shaft and one or more generally frustoconical surface and/or cylindrical surface may be generally parallel to the longitudinal axis of the shaft. In its deployed state, the mesh or braided material or other flexible material can be configured so that the fold-over edge of the mesh (i.e., the area where the mesh folds back or inverts on itself) can be drawn inwardly toward a center point or central axis of the shaft such that the problem of tissue growing over the top of the deployed retainer is reduced.
Another feature of the C-PEG is the ability for the distal end of the shaft to recess within the deployed retainer. That is, during deployment of the retainer, the distal end of the shaft is located in a more proximal position than the fold-over edge of the deployed retainer. This prevents the distal end of the shaft from contacting tissue when the retainer is in the deployed state.
According to the invention, a locking mechanism integrated with the C-PEG device locks the retainer in its deployed state. This may be accomplished by mechanical engagement, friction, compression or other techniques. One embodiment of a suitable locking mechanism is a spacer lock. When the first or inner tube is pulled or retracted into the second or outer tube towards the proximal end of the shaft to deploy the retainer, the proximal end of the first or inner tube will extend a predetermined distance beyond the proximal end of the second or outer tube. A spacer may be employed to prevent the second (i.e., outer) tube from returning to its initial insertion or un-deployed position.
In another locking embodiment, the locking mechanism does not utilize a spacer but instead uses a clamp to grip the tubing. After the retainer is deployed, the clamp is placed over the outside of the first tube and clamped to the tube with enough force to ensure the lock cannot move along the tube but not too much force as to deform the lumen of the device. The clamp may be placed on the first (i.e., inner) tube and clamped so that the second (i.e., outer) tube butts up against it and the clamp prevents the second outer tube from returning to its initial insertion state position.
A better understanding of the above and many other features and advantages of the configurable percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube obtained from a consideration of the detailed description of the invention below, particularly if such consideration is made in conjunction with the appended drawings.
Reference will now be made in detail to one or more embodiments, examples of which are illustrated in the drawings. It should be understood that features illustrated or described as part of one embodiment may be used with another embodiment to yield still a further embodiment.
Turning now to
The CPEG device 200 incorporates a releasable lock 212 for maintaining the expandable retainer in its deployed position. As used herein, the term “lock” refers to an element that secures two or more components in position relative to each other by engagement or interlocking of parts, friction, compression or other techniques and may encompass individual or integrated mechanisms such as clamps, detents, clips, magnets, intermeshing threaded components, fasteners (e.g., mechanical hook & loop fastening systems), refastening/reusable adhesives or the like. The releasable lock 212 is located at or near the second end 206 of the shaft 202. Generally speaking, the C-PEG device 200 also includes a base 240 which has an opening (not shown) allowing access through the base. The shaft 202 is desirably positioned through the base 240 in communication with the opening in the base. As noted above, the shaft 202 has walls defining a lumen from the opening in the base to the distal end of the shaft. The base 240 is generally located proximal to the releasable lock 212. It is contemplated that the releasable lock 212 may be integrated in the base 240.
Referring now to
The expandable retainer 208 is generally in the form of a hollow sleeve or flexible skeleton that has two opposing ends 216 and 218. This sleeve is desirably formed of a flexible plastic mesh, braided material, braided mesh-like materials (e.g., braid of monofilament fibers), net or network of material, and/or flexible ribs (e.g., desirably flat ribs) composed of one or more materials such as, for example, PET (polyethylene terephthatlate), PEEK (poly(ether-ether-ketone)), or nylon (various polyamides).
In an aspect of the invention and referring now to
The bonding ring BR is particularly useful for aiding the smooth transition of flexible plastic mesh, braided materials, braided mesh-like materials (e.g. braid of monofilament fibers), nets or network of materials with the surface of the outer tube 222 to provide a very smooth, low profile interface. This very smooth, low profile interface between the mesh 214 of the retainer 208 and the outer tube 222 reduces irritation and also reduces friction during insertion and/or removal of the C-PEG device 200 through a stoma. The bonding ring BR may be configured to act as a “stop” when the end 218 of the retainer is drawn past the midpoint M towards the end 216 to arrive at the deployed position. That is, a portion of the bonding ring at the end 216 may be shaped or flared to provide a flange, lip or rim such that it serves as a check or stop that controls the amount of retraction of the first or inner tube 220 into the second or outer tube 222 or prevents the end 218 from retracting completely into the second or outer tube 222. Alternatively and/or additionally, a protrusion, knob, annular ring, flange or the like may be formed at an appropriate location on the first or inner tube 220 to serve as a check or stop to control the amount of retraction of the first or inner tube 220 into the second or outer tube 222 or to prevent the end 218 from retracting completely into the second or outer tube 222.
As is illustrated in
Referring to
The flexible sheath 210 may snugly conform to the retainer in the deployed state as illustrated in the sequence of
Referring to
Generally speaking, a second end 218 of the retainer 208 is joined to the distal portion or end of the first or inner tube 220 and a first end 216 of the retainer 208 is joined to a distal portion or end of the second or outer tube 222. When the retainer 208 is in an insertion position (or in an un-deployed state), the first or inner tube 220 generally extends a distance beyond the end of the second or outer tube 222 as generally illustrated in
Referring now to
Another feature of the C-PEG is the ability for the distal end of the shaft to recess within the deployed retainer as generally illustrated in
According to the invention, the releasable lock 212 locks the expandable retainer 208 in its deployed state. One embodiment of a suitable releasable lock 212 is a spacer lock.
Referring to
The end 232 of the latch arm 228 may have opposing clamp-like extensions 234 (e.g., parts that partially encircle the inner tube 220) that are stiff enough so that they remain around the inner tube 220 despite forces normal to the inner tube 220. The clamp-like extensions 234 are configured to fit or wrap around the first tube 220 so that the outer tube 222 butts up against them. The majority of the force that resists the outer tube 222 from returning to its original position is taken up by the latch arm 228 connecting the clamp-like extensions 234 to the fitting 226 and/or the base 240. Other embodiments of the spacer lock do not require clamp-like extensions to be wrapped around the first inner tube but may utilize an element or feature that just wraps around the first inner tube to keep the latch arm 228 in place.
In an embodiment, the clamp-like extensions 234 or the end 232 of the latch arm 228 can be configured to create friction between the inner tube 220 and the outer tube 222 that keeps the expandable retainer 208 in its deployed state. Referring to
The end of the latch arm 228 closest to the base should be flexible to allow swing positioning. The portions of the releasable lock 212 that form the clamp-like extensions 234 desirably have a relatively higher level of stiffness to keep the latch arm 228 in place. These clamp-like extensions 234 should be stiff enough to avoid becoming unintentionally opened and must be rigid enough to withstand normal wear and tear. The other portions of the releasable lock 212 need to be flexible enough to withstand repeated use by locking and unlocking; they can also be made to compensate for minor changes in the stoma tract. It is contemplated that other integrated locking mechanism such as clamps, detents, clips, magnets, fasteners or the like can also be used.
In another embodiment illustrated in
In yet another embodiment illustrated in
While the present invention has been described in connection with certain preferred embodiments it is to be understood that the subject matter encompassed by way of the present invention is not to be limited to those specific embodiments. On the contrary, it is intended for the subject matter of the invention to include all alternatives, modifications and equivalents as can be included within the spirit and scope of the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/386,793 filed on Sep. 27, 2010 and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/446,229 filed on Feb. 25, 2011, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3397699 | Kohl | Aug 1968 | A |
3633579 | Alley et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
4315513 | Nawash et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4393873 | Nawash et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4531943 | Van Tassel et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4627838 | Cross et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4758219 | Sacks et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4850953 | Haber et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4861334 | Nawaz | Aug 1989 | A |
5073166 | Parks et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5248302 | Patrick et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5336203 | Goldhardt et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5356391 | Stewart | Oct 1994 | A |
5374254 | Buma | Dec 1994 | A |
5429598 | Waxman et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5702365 | King | Dec 1997 | A |
6030361 | Miyashiro | Feb 2000 | A |
6030406 | Davis et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6039714 | Cracauer et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6077250 | Snow et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6186985 | Snow | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6322538 | Elbert et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6364858 | Picha | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6881420 | Flashner-Barak et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6896665 | Picha et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6918888 | Gershowitz | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6942641 | Seddon | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7083595 | Chu et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7232426 | Itrich et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7547303 | DeLegge | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7654980 | Weststrate et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7771396 | Stefanchik et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
20030225392 | McMichael et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040049157 | Plishka et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050085771 | Lyon | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060030818 | McVey | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060270989 | McMichael et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070078465 | Williams et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070233005 | McMichael et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239171 | Stefanchik et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255222 | Li et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20090024091 | Li et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090318854 | Bailey | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090318873 | Bailey | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100022969 | Renaux | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20110137252 | Oster et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 824 929 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1674125 | Apr 2009 | EP |
2 428 198 | Jan 2007 | GB |
2428198 | Jan 2007 | GB |
WO 9902093 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 03092708 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 03092780 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 2004112877 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2004112879 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2010075032 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO 2011053242 | May 2011 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120078174 A1 | Mar 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61386793 | Sep 2010 | US | |
61446229 | Feb 2011 | US |