Data models define a collection of components and potentially also the interrelationships between those components. The components may be any definable entity, and the relationship between the components may be any definable relationship. Data models are not limited to defining software components such as objects in an object-oriented program. Components in the data model may also be representations of people (in the case of, for example, an organizational hierarchy data model), steps or flows (in the case of a process data model), cash credits or debits (in the case of a balance sheet data model), and so forth for a potentially unlimited variety of data models. The nature of the components will often depend on the nature of the data model itself.
The various components of a data model may have various associated attributes. Furthermore, each component might have various relationship types with other components of the data model. In order to gain a reasonable intuition on a particular data model, it is helpful to have a particular visual representation (or view) of the data model. However, some views may emphasize particular attributes, and perhaps particular relationship types, but may unintentionally deemphasize other attributes and relationship types.
When a developer designs a computer-implemented view of a data model, the developer may program software that illustrates what is applied to a particular data model to show a particular view of the particular data model. However, to do that, the developer might go through detailed coding processes and labor associated with developing that computer-implemented view. Alternatively or in addition, the view may be limited to only one particular view of the data, and have limited configurability.
Although not required, some embodiments described herein relate to the configurability of various views on data models. A framework may be provided that offers one or more parameterized view generation components, each aimed at generating a particular view type in response to configuration data that populates the parameters of the associated component. Accordingly, a user or other computing entity merely provides configuration data to an appropriate view generation component to generate a custom view. That custom view may then optionally be applied to any number of data models, or perhaps not applied to any data model at all and just saved for some future use.
In one embodiment, a composite viewer may be generated that includes various different views on a data model, allowing the user to simultaneously view the data model from different perspectives thereby potentially gaining further insight and understanding as compared to just viewing the data model through one view.
Alternatively, or in addition, a composite view of a data model may be embedded in yet another composite view to generate a hierarchical structure of views. In one embodiment, the highest layer of that hierarchy might even be an entire application, or even perhaps an operating system.
This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
These and other objects and features of the present invention will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, or may be learned by the practice of the invention as set forth hereinafter.
To further clarify the above and other advantages and features of the present invention, a more particular description of the invention will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is appreciated that these drawings depict only illustrated embodiments of the invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope. The invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:
Embodiments described herein relate to a data-driven configuration of various views on data models. First, some introductory discussion regarding a computing system in which the principles described herein may be employed will be described with respect to
As illustrated in
In the description that follows, embodiments are described with reference to acts that are performed by one or more computing systems. If such acts are implemented in software, one or more processors of the associated computing system that performs the act direct the operation of the computing system in response to having executed computer-executable instructions. An example of such an operation involves the manipulation of data. The computer-executable instructions (and the manipulated data) may be stored in the memory 104 of the computing system 100.
Computing system 100 may also contain communication channels 108 that allow the computing system 100 to communicate with other message processors over, for example, network 110. Communication channels 108 are examples of communications media. Communications media typically embody computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data in a modulated data signal such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism and include any information-delivery media. By way of example, and not limitation, communications media include wired media, such as wired networks and direct-wired connections, and wireless media such as acoustic, radio, infrared, and other wireless media. The term “computer-readable media” as used herein includes both storage media and communications media.
Embodiments within the scope of the present invention also include computer-readable media for carrying or having computer-executable instructions or data structures stored thereon. Such computer-readable media can be any available media that can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer. By way of example, and not limitation, such computer-readable media can comprise physical storage and/or memory media such as RAM, ROM, EEPROM, CD-ROM or other optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to carry or store desired program code means in the form of computer-executable instructions or data structures and which can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer. When information is transferred or provided over a network or another communications connection (either hardwired, wireless, or a combination of hardwired or wireless) to a computer, the computer properly views the connection as a computer-readable medium. Thus, any such connection is properly termed a computer-readable medium. Combinations of the above should also be included within the scope of computer-readable media.
Computer-executable instructions comprise, for example, instructions and data which cause a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or special purpose processing device to perform a certain function or group of functions. Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described herein. Rather, the specific features and acts described herein are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.
The possibilities are limitless for what a data model might be. The principles described herein may be applied wherever different users might want different views of a data model. For instance, in a process data model in which the components are steps, some individuals (such as general contractors) might want a view that emphasizes which steps are dependent on completion of other steps, and that emphasizes a representation of a time required for each step to complete. The contractor or another user might want a view that emphasizes which steps have been completed, which are in process, and which are not started. If the data model were the solar system, a scientist might want a realistic scaled view of the solar system, perhaps one that outlines the orbit of the various planets. Another view on the solar system might artificially enlarge the representation of the various planets so that they might be more easily viewed by schoolchildren who are being taught about the solar system. For any given data model, a user might want to easily switch their view of the data model from one custom view to another, or even perhaps view multiple custom views of the data model simultaneously. Having given this example, the principles described herein may apply to any data model, and to any configurable view on that data model.
The process of formulating a custom view is data driven. The user or some other human or computing entity may set configuration data 201 that defines how the custom view will be constructed. The configuration data 201 is one of the inputs to the custom view generator 210. The configuration data 201 may be all provided at once, or may be provided at different times during the custom view construction process. In one embodiment, the configuration data 201 is declarative.
The type of configuration data 201 might not be standardized, but may differ according to the type of custom view to be generated. There are a variety of view construction modules 202 that might each correspond to a particular custom view type. There might be numerous view construction modules 202 available to the custom view generator 210. However, in
Referring to
The parameters of the view construction module 300 may be populated by the configuration data 201 if the view construction module 300 is to be used to generate a custom view. The logic 310 of the view construction module 300 may then be used with the various populated parameters as inputs to define underlying behavior of the view. For instance, if the custom view was to be a flowchart of the process data model in which the components were steps, a parameter might be whether dependencies are to be shown, a designation of the symbol types that are to be used to represent the various step times (e.g., conditional branching, start and stop steps, and others), whether there are certain conditions to be applied such as minimizing certain steps if the number of steps exceeds a certain number, and the like. Accordingly, the configuration may be a property of a view (e.g., background color), but may also include a condition that affects the behavior of a view, and that may potentially require further information before the structure of the custom view may be known. For instance, if there are more than 20 components in a data model, a different view entirely may be used to represent that view as compared to there being 20 or less components in the data model.
Referring back to
The configuration data is accessed (act 501). For instance, in
The configuration data is then applied as one or more parameter to a corresponding view construction module (act 503). In
Thereafter, user input may be detected designating that the custom view is to be applied to a data model to generate a custom view of the data model (act 505). Alternatively, some other triggering mechanism might be used to determine that a custom view is to be applied to a data model. This results in the generation of a custom view of the data model (act 506).
Some of the custom views may represent composite views formulated as a collection of one or more other custom views. For instance,
The upper left corner represents a master view 601 that illustrates a representation of all of the data models that the composite custom view may be applied to. In this case, the fifth data model is selected. If another data model is selected in the master view 601, the detail views 602 through 604 would show views of a different data model. The physical relationship of the various views of the composite view may also be configurable.
The views may be applied hierarchically. For instance, in
In
Accordingly, embodiments have been described in which various views of data models may be generated in a configurable way. An intermediary programmer or even a user may thus be able to quickly define and change various views on a data model. This flexibility allows for the generation of views in a manner that is more tailored for a particular application or user.
The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4447888 | Kuecker | May 1984 | A |
4862410 | Fukunaga | Aug 1989 | A |
5050105 | Peters | Sep 1991 | A |
5212771 | Gane | May 1993 | A |
5307493 | Gusenius | Apr 1994 | A |
5513305 | Maghbouleh | Apr 1996 | A |
5596704 | Geddes | Jan 1997 | A |
5694608 | Shostak | Dec 1997 | A |
5754859 | Long | May 1998 | A |
5825355 | Palmer et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5940615 | Novick | Aug 1999 | A |
6018738 | Breese et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6049335 | Lida | Apr 2000 | A |
6055327 | Aragon | Apr 2000 | A |
6098072 | Sluiman | Aug 2000 | A |
6110223 | Southgate et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6160549 | Touma et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167455 | Friedman et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6232984 | Chuah et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243091 | Berstis | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6269475 | Farrell et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6335745 | Amro et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6405216 | Minnaert | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6558431 | Lynche | May 2003 | B1 |
6717589 | Grillo et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6806887 | Chernock et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6851107 | Coad | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6985876 | Lee | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6986103 | Beezer | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6995768 | Jou et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7007029 | Chen | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7110936 | Hiew | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7155678 | Cooper et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7196712 | Rajarajan et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7240296 | Matthews | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7272815 | Eldridge et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7370315 | Lovell et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7596611 | Satish | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7712042 | Hernandez-Sherrington | May 2010 | B2 |
7743330 | Hendricks | Jun 2010 | B1 |
20010028368 | Swartz et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020099584 | Findley | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020109717 | Li | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020158864 | Matichuk | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030033284 | Warren et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030043200 | Faieta et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040027388 | Berg | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040036718 | Warren | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040122791 | Sea et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050114778 | Branson et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050187930 | Subramanian et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050210412 | Matthews | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050210445 | Gough et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060015817 | Fioretti | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060112123 | Clark et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060168182 | Fuller et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060200476 | Gottumukkala | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224997 | Wong | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060294474 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070061758 | Manson | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070106974 | Chafe et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130193 | McNally | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136333 | Hassan | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070214173 | Ohashi | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070299823 | Getsch | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080196015 | Bekelman | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090193037 | Yu et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090287724 | Murray | Nov 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO2006096792 | Sep 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090284549 A1 | Nov 2009 | US |