Enterprise portals typically seek to provide users with a single point of access to multiple resources such as information and services. For example, in a business setting, employees may use enterprise portals to manage inventory, track finances, and review procedures, all through a unified interface such as by directing a browser to an intranet site. A portal includes components, referred to herein as portal applications.
Typically, business objects, such as inventory, customer lists, and engineering information are maintained by one component, such as a business information server. Documentation, such as product manuals, sales reports, and testing data are typically maintained by another component, such as a document management system. Complex queries are generally required to find documents in the document management system that are related to business objects in the business information server and vice versa. Therefore, it would be desirable to have a better way to locate relevant information.
Various embodiments of the invention are disclosed in the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings.
The invention can be implemented in numerous ways, including as a process, an apparatus, a system, a composition of matter, a computer readable medium such as a computer readable storage medium or a computer network wherein program instructions are sent over optical or electronic communication links. In this specification, these implementations, or any other form that the invention may take, may be referred to as techniques. A component such as a processor or a memory described as being configured to perform a task includes both a general component that is temporarily configured to perform the task at a given time or a specific component that is manufactured to perform the task. In general, the order of the steps of disclosed processes may be altered within the scope of the invention.
A detailed description of one or more embodiments of the invention is provided below along with accompanying figures that illustrate the principles of the invention. The invention is described in connection with such embodiments, but the invention is not limited to any embodiment. The scope of the invention is limited only by the claims and the invention encompasses numerous alternatives, modifications and equivalents. Numerous specific details are set forth in the following description in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. These details are provided for the purpose of example and the invention may be practiced according to the claims without some or all of these specific details. For the purpose of clarity, technical material that is known in the technical fields related to the invention has not been described in detail so that the invention is not unnecessarily obscured.
Business server 108 includes a business repository 110 which stores, for example, plant management, engineering management, and supply chain management information, as well as related information such as accounting information, customer records, etc. (hereinafter referred to collectively as ‘business information’ and ‘business objects’).
Document server 112 is configured to store documents that support business information in document repository 114, as well as to provide interactive capabilities for those documents, such as the abilities to search, create, edit, and collaborate. As used herein, documents can include web pages, text files, multimedia files, and other content.
In the example shown, portal server 116 is an SAP Enterprise Portal server and business server 108 includes mySAP Enterprise Resource Planning software. Other portal servers and business servers, such as products made by Oracle and Siebel may be used and the techniques described herein adapted, as applicable. Document server 112 includes EMC Documentum software. In various embodiments, business repository 110 and/or document repository 114 are located on portal server 116 and business server 108 and document server 112, respectively, are omitted as appropriate.
Suppose Alice, a recently hired engineer, has been assigned to redesign a pump having a model number of P-1000-N001. In the example shown, she has selected to ‘search equipment documentation’ (166) and is presented with a portal view that includes two applications—a business application displayed in region 156, and a document application displayed in region 158.
As shown, Alice has instructed portal 104 to display business information having an equipment description of ‘electric pump 001’ (170). Portal server 116 communicates with business server 108 to supply this information. As described in more detail below, by selecting checkbox 160 of region 156, Alice is automatically presented (in region 158) with documents stored in document repository 114 that are associated with pump P-1000-N001. Portal server 116 communicates with document server 112 to supply this information, including a sales presentation (162) and a product overview presentation (164).
As described in more detail below, documents 162 and 164 are linked with the pump P-1000-N001 business object. And, without having any knowledge of how document server 112 works or in what way documents are stored or retrieved from document repository 114, Alice's selection action (event) automatically causes the appropriate query to be performed.
Document applications, such as document application 204 and 206 provide access to documents associated with equipment, such as invoices, product manuals, quality assurance data, etc. In some embodiments, a document application may comprise a content management system module configured to provide one or more content management functions with respect to a body of managed content, e.g., documents or other files or stored objects. As described in more detail below, other business information and related documents, such as information related to employees and processes may also be provided by business applications and document applications.
Additional applications, such as applications 208 and 210 may also be present in portal 104. In some embodiments, applications 208 and 210 are third party applications. In other embodiments, applications 208 and 210 are additional business applications, or are omitted.
A user interacts with portal 104, causing one or more events (also referred to herein as ‘portal events’) to occur. For example, when Alice selects checkbox 160, a selection event is broadcast (212) by business application 202. Business application 202 and applications 208 and 210 include logic to listen for and interpret broadcast events such as event 212. Event broadcasts typically include a key (such as P-1000-N001), a type to which the key belongs (such as ‘product’), and what the event was (such as select).
An event controller 214 also contains logic to listen for and interpret broadcast events, such as event 212. However, rather than listening for events directly, document applications 204 and 206 receive event notification, if it all, via event controller 214. In some embodiments, event controller 214 also manages authentication, such as authenticating the portal user with the document application
As used herein, the term ‘document application’ refers to any content management system, application, or process, or any component or module thereof or third party application configured to run thereon, or any other application, system, or process configured to perform one or more content management functions with respect to a body of documents and/or other stored content, such as a set of file system objects.
When an event is detected, at 304 it is determined whether the event is of interest. An event is considered of interest if event controller 214 is configured to monitor for it. For example, event controller 214 can be configured to listen for broadcasts made by business application 202 and ignore all broadcasts made by portal application 208. Event controller 214 can also be configured to listen for only certain types of business applications. For example, event controller 214 may be configured to listen for events involving customers, but ignore events involving engineering management. Similarly, event controller 214 can be configured to listen for certain types of events (e.g., select, refresh, multiple select) and ignore others (e.g., delete).
In some embodiments, if the information broadcast in event 212 is readily understood by a document application, the event is passed by event controller 214 through to the application without modification. Such may be the case, for example, with a ‘page refresh’ event that directs an application to redisplay the last information, if any, that it is displayed in interface 150 of
In some embodiments, the logic of how to interpret the payload is centralized in event controller 214. If modifications are ever made, for example, to the manner in which document server 112 is interfaced, event controller 214 can be updated without having to also update document applications 204-206. Additionally, if new events are supported, such as for portal applications 208 and 210 to use, event controller 214 can be updated with logic to interpret those events without each document application 204-206 requiring an update. Similarly, by centralizing the logic of how to interpret the payload in event controller 214, third parties writing portal applications such as portal application 208, or custom modules to be added to document applications such as 204 and 206, need learn only how to interface with event controller 214, rather than a plurality of document applications.
At 404, the event type and corresponding payload format for the event type are determined. If the event type and payload are well formed (406), at 408, the event information is conveyed to the appropriate document application(s). In some embodiments, to which document application the event information is conveyed depends on the context of the event. Suppose interface 150 includes both a customer-related business application and an equipment-related business application on the same page. When event controller 214 receives a broadcast event indicating that a customer has been selected, that information may be conveyed to document application 204. When event controller 214 receives a broadcast event indicating that a piece of equipment has been selected, that information may instead be conveyed to document application 206, as appropriate.
Whether or not the event type and payload are considered well formed can be based on a variety of factors. For example, in various embodiments, an ill formed event is one in which the data is corrupted, one in which the data is not in a recognized format, one that contains a syntax error or other error in the control portions of the message, etc.
At 410, if the event type and/or payload are not well formed, the event is discarded. In some embodiments, additional checks are performed at 406, such as whether the event and/or its payload pose a security risk. In such case, event controller 214 can be configured to discard the event at 410, rather than passing that information through to document application 204.
Linking Business Objects and Documents
As described above, in
Documents can also be unlinked. For example, suppose every time Alice views a product known as Pump-2000, she is erroneously presented with company-wide sales figures from the year 2000. In such a case, a ‘negative’ link can be used to disassociate the business object from the irrelevant document.
At 604, a link record is created. For example, at 604, a table is created (or updated) on business server 108 to include the business object ID in a row and the document ID in a column (or vice versa). In some embodiments, at 604, a table is created on document server 112 instead of or in addition to the table created on business server 108.
When documents are hard linked with business objects, if searching functionality is limited or unavailable, documents associated with business objects may nevertheless be located. For example, if portal server 116 malfunctions, documents associated with business objects may nevertheless be obtained by interfacing with document server 112 directly. Additionally, if a user or group of users has write access to only one of document repository 114 and business repository 110, they may nonetheless link documents and business objects by maintaining hard links on the server to which they do have access.
In some embodiments, the process shown in
At 704, the document is updated to include information associated with the business object. For example, at 704, an attribute of the document (such as a ‘related objects’ field or other meta information) is updated to include the business object ID of the business object.
In some embodiments, the process shown in
In some embodiments, the process shown in
In various embodiments, portal 104 is configured to suggest business objects to which a document is related and/or should be linked. For example, after optical character recognition (OCR) has been performed with respect to an incoming document, natural language techniques and/or other heuristics can be employed to determine, for example, frequently used key words and a list of possible business objects from which a user can select association with are presented.
In some embodiments, portions 702 and 704 of the process shown in
Displaying Context-Relevant Documents
In the example shown in
The contexts for which documents are to be displayed in interface 150 can be customized in a variety of ways. For example, templates can be created for particular job functions such that when a member of the marketing department logs into portal 104 and searches for pumps, the information shown to them will be different from the view that a member of the engineering department, such as Alice, will receive, with precisely the same query. A manager's view can include documents, such as unreviewed or as-yet-unapproved drafts of documents that would be hidden from the view of a typical employee and/or additional functionality, such as the ability to edit or approve a document can be added or removed, as applicable. Similarly, when a member of the finance department views a pump, invoices will be shown and information such as product manuals will not.
At 804, attributes/keywords/meta information that help indicate to which of the categories specified in 802 a document or subset of documents belong are received. For example, at 804, a list of document types (e.g., invoice, design specification, etc.) is received and associated with the roles specified at 802. In some cases, the same attributes/keywords/meta information are associated with multiple roles. For example, an engineer role (or context) is associated with documents of types design specification and product manual, and a quality assurance role is associated with documents of type product manual, as well as customer surveys.
In the preceding example, in some embodiments an engineer who selected ‘pump P-1000-N001’ in a business application frame/window of a portal would be presented in a document application portal documents comprising design specifications and product manuals for pump P-1000-N001, whereas a quality assurance employee would be presented with product manuals and customer survey documents for pump P-1000-N001. In some embodiments, the content presented would be determined based at least in part on credential information associated with the current user, e.g., mapping a username to a role such as engineer or quality assurance. In some embodiments, a menu or other selection interface would be presented to enable a user to indicate the context-relevant content desired to be viewed and/or accessed, e.g., by selecting ‘engineering’ or ‘quality assurance’ from a drop down menu.
In various embodiments, the configuration information received in the process of
In some embodiments, additional credentials are required by document server 112 before certain actions (such as editing) or displaying certain documents are permitted. For example, suppose that in addition to documents 162 and 164 shown in
Although the foregoing embodiments have been described in some detail for purposes of clarity of understanding, the invention is not limited to the details provided. There are many alternative ways of implementing the invention. The disclosed embodiments are illustrative and not restrictive.
This application is a continuation of, and claims a benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. 120 of, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/146,608 filed Sep. 28, 2018, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,581,754, entitled “CONFIGURABLE VIEWS OF CONTEXT-RELEVANT CONTENT”, which is a continuation of, and claims a benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. 120 of, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/834,272 filed Dec. 7, 2017, entitled “CONFIGURABLE VIEWS OF CONTEXT-RELEVANT CONTENT”, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,382,357, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/537,712 filed Nov. 10, 2014, entitled “CONFIGURABLE VIEWS OF CONTEXT-RELEVANT CONTENT”, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,887,934, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/473,544 filed Jun. 22, 2006, entitled “CONFIGURABLE VIEWS OF CONTEXT-RELEVANT CONTENT”, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,909,748, all of which are hereby incorporated herein for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5768578 | Kirk | Jun 1998 | A |
6098081 | Heidorn et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6282537 | Madnick | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6363435 | Fernando et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6804674 | Hsiao | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6957234 | Steinbach | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7017183 | Frey et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7139757 | Apollonsky | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7151438 | Hall et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7236966 | Jackson et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7305381 | Poppink | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7403989 | Beringer et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7426548 | Griffin et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7496687 | Griffin et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7512597 | Akilov et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
8898264 | Walther et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8909748 | Chaudhari et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
9887934 | Chaudhari et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9892209 | Walther et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
10382357 | Chaudhari | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10581754 | Chaudhari et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10585947 | Walther et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
11593430 | Walther et al. | Feb 2023 | B2 |
20010056504 | Kuznetsov | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020019819 | Sekiguchi | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020052980 | Sanghvi et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020095418 | Honda et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020118220 | Lui et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020165784 | Taggart et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020196741 | Jaramillo et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030018624 | Hsiao | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030078942 | Childress et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030109938 | Daum et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030126136 | Omolgui | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030154232 | Beringer et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030187956 | Belt et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204429 | Botscheck et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040002887 | Fliess et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040017395 | Coak | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040031058 | Reisman | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049589 | Papanikolaau et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040068527 | Smith, III | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040068714 | Deimel et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073531 | Patterson | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040177319 | Horn | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040210452 | Aboujaoude et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225718 | Heinze et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040237120 | Lewin | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243422 | Weber et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040243577 | Choudhary | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050055337 | Bebo et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060371 | Cohen et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060721 | Choudhary et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050120292 | Suzuki | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050198042 | Davis | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050278297 | Nelson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060017975 | Ly et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060085412 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060161672 | Jolley et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060174093 | Jolley et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060229896 | Rosen | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242249 | Swanson et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060248045 | Toledano et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271535 | Hammond | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070033196 | Moore | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070061327 | Oscherov | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073831 | Oscherov | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070094045 | Cobbs | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070136245 | Hess | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070233820 | Schneider | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070261063 | Matousek et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070265929 | Danninger | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080033929 | Al-Kofahi | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20100325709 | Kawase | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20130332566 | Oscherov | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140108601 | Larocque | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140289530 | De Waal | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20160156730 | Oscherov | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20180081987 | Walther et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20190036840 | Chaudhari et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20200192939 | Walther | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20230185854 | Walther et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Liveiink ECM—DocuUnk for SAP® Solutions, Data Sheet, Open Text Corporation, 2006, 2 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/473,538, dated Oct. 16, 2008, 13 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/473,544, dated Oct. 28, 2008, 11 pgs. |
El-Beltagy et al., Linking in Context, Journal of Digital Information, vol. 2, Issue 3, Article 90, ACM, Mar. 12, 2008, pp. 151-160. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/473,538, dated Apr. 3, 2009, 11 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/473,544, dated May 5, 2009, 11 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/473,538, dated Sep. 16, 2009, 14 pgs. |
Berners-Lee et al., Hypertext Markup Language—2.0, Network Working Group—Request for Comments: 1866, Nov. 1995, 78 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/473,544, dated Oct. 2, 2009, 13 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/473,538, dated Apr. 20, 2010, 16 pgs. |
Pemberton et al., Hlink: Link recognition for the XHTML Family, W3C Working Draft, W3C, Sep. 13, 2002, 20 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/473,544, dated May 11, 2010, 11 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/473,538, dated Oct. 29, 2010, 16 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/473,544, dated Jan. 18, 2011, 16 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/473,538, dated Apr. 14, 2011, 22 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/473,544, dated May 16, 2011, 10 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/473,538, dated Oct. 17, 2011, 12 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/473,538, dated May 9, 2012, 17 pgs. |
Priebe et al., Towards Integrative Enterprise Knowledge Portals, CIKM'03, ACM, Nov. 3-8, 2003, pp. 216-223. |
Priebe et al., Ontology-based Integration of OLAP and Information Retrieval, Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA'03), IEEE, 2003, pp. 216-223. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/473,538, dated Mar. 27, 2014, 21 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,770, dated Nov. 3, 2016, 19 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/537,712, dated Nov. 21, 2016, 10 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,770, dated Mar. 7, 2017, 15 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/537,712, dated Mar. 17, 2017, 9 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/826,323, dated Jul. 2, 2019, 11 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/146,608, dated Sep. 13, 2019, 11 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/826,323, dated Oct. 30, 2019, 8 pgs. |
Office Action issued for U.S. Appl. No. 16/795,395, dated Jun. 22, 2022, 14 pages. |
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/795,395 dated Oct. 31, 2022, 8 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200120044 A1 | Apr 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16146608 | Sep 2018 | US |
Child | 16714456 | US | |
Parent | 15834272 | Dec 2017 | US |
Child | 16146608 | US | |
Parent | 14537712 | Nov 2014 | US |
Child | 15834272 | US | |
Parent | 11473544 | Jun 2006 | US |
Child | 14537712 | US |