Configured and sized cannula

Abstract
A dilator retractor and the dilators that are used for minimally invasive spinal surgery or other surgery are configured to accommodate the anatomical structure of the patient as by configuring the cross sectional area in an elliptical shape, or by forming a funnel configuration with the wider end at the proximate end. In some embodiments the distal end is contoured to also accommodate the anatomical structure of the patient so that a cylindrically shaped, funnel shaped, ovoid shaped dilator retractor can be sloped or tunneled to accommodate the bone structure of the patient or provide access for implants. The dilator retractor is made with different lengths to accommodate the depth of the cavity formed by the dilators.
Description
CROSS REFERENCE

This invention relates to the material disclosed and claimed in a co-pending patent application by the same inventor entitled “Non Cannulated Dilators” and bearing Ser. No. 10/021,809 and incorporated herein by reference.


TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention relates to medical instruments for use in surgical procedures and more particularly to a wide-channel cannula that is pre-sized, pre-configured and tailored to conform to the patient's anatomy.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In one aspect of this invention, the invention considers the anatomical shape of the area of the patient being operated on and tailors the shape of the dilators and the dilator retractor or cannula to accommodate that shape. In another aspect of this invention, the invention constitutes an improvement over the apparatus and method disclosed and claimed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,159,179 granted on Dec. 12, 2000 to the inventor of this patent application and entitled “Cannula and Sizing and Insertion Method” by providing different sizes of the same configuration of dilator retractors.


As is well known by those skilled in this technology, the cannula utilized in the field of minimally invasive surgery is particularly efficacious in performing such spinal medical procedures as laminotomy, medial facetectomy, foraminotomy, nerve root retraction, discectomy and the like, is cylindrically shaped. I have found that a cylindrically shaped cannula is not always ideal for certain surgical procedures and this invention is intended to obviate the problems incidental to a cylindrically shaped cannula and to increase the number of surgical procedures that can be performed by dilation methods by changing the configuration of the retractor tube or cannula. As is apparent to one skilled in this technology, the anatomy of the human spine is not made up of flat surfaces and a purely cylindrical device passed over cylindrical dilators and directed toward the lamina more likely than not settles off of or partly on the bone. When this occurs, a tuft of muscle migrates to or is left between the bone and the bottom of the retractor and must be removed surgically. Obviously, this surgery is a source of pain and discomfort for the patient and creates an additional surgical step for the surgeon. Moreover, this additional surgery causes additional bleeding and as a consequence, creates an obstruction to the vision of the surgeon. In order to cure the obstruction, the surgeon must address this problem through an electro cautery procedure.


Also apparent to one skilled in this technology is that the pathological target within the patient is often not an equal distance vertically and horizontally. Hence, a surgical procedure may require a surgical approach that for ideal conditions, provides access that is more vertical in orientation than lateral. Obviously, a cylindrical device as has been heretofore available and as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,159,179 supra, which is equidistant from the axis, does not allow for this approach. Thus, in a cylindrical cannula, in order to gain additional vertical access the size of the cannula must be increased the same amount in the lateral direction that it is in the vertical direction. Obviously, the human spine's skeletal structure, i.e. lateral facets and medial spinous process, restricts the amount of lateral space available. In a cylindrical cannula, since a limitation of the lateral space that is available to locate a retractor, the vertical space is likewise limited. As a consequence, the cylindrical cannula limits the number of patients who are candidates for minimally invasive spinal surgery necessitating the more invasive type surgery with all of the problems associated therewith. Hence, for a large segment of the patient population, the only surgery available is the more destructive invasive muscle burning and stripping approach. This invention addresses this problem and provides a solution whereby the minimal invasive surgery is now possible which otherwise was considered impossible to perform, unpractical or unpredictable in terms of surgical success or long-term outcome.


The other aspect of this invention is the improvement to the system claimed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,159,179, supra. In this patent, the depth of the cavity at the location where the invasive procedure is being performed is measured and the surgeon can then select from a kit or inventory of different sized cannulas or retractors the desired size required to perform the surgical procedure.


I have found that a solution to the problem noted in the immediate above paragraphs is that I provide in one embodiment of this invention, dilators and retractors that are configured other than in a cylindrical shape, such as an ovoid, and that I provide different sizes to meet the anatomical needs of a particular patient. By providing dilators and dilator retractors made in accordance with this invention, these instruments will be able to reach down between the facet joint and the spinous process to gently part muscle tissue and come into closer contact to the bony target. This will reduce or eliminate the need for the surgeon to surgically remove otherwise valuable viable muscle tissue. This will also reduce post-operative pain and inter-operative time (fiddle). In addition to the above, this new design will allow surgeons to address new pathologies in patients that previously would not have been able to undergo a minimally invasive technique. To more fully appreciate the importance of this invention a common example is discussed immediately hereinbelow.


This example considers a patient with multilevel central canal stenosis. To address this patient's pathology, the surgeon may need over 35 millimeters (mm) of vertical access. The typical lateral distance, i.e., space between the spinous process and the facet joint, available at the L4 lamina is 16 mm. A 16 mm cylindrical retractor would fit tightly against the lamina but even with “wanding” (moving up and down) it would restrict the surgeons ability to reach much more than the 16 mm in vertical access. The only option that is available to the surgeon, heretofore, is to utilize a cylindrical retractor. As explained above, since the equation for a cylindrical retractor mandates that the lateral and vertical expansions are equal, the cylindrical retractor would quickly reach beyond the practical or acceptable size for many, if not most, multilevel patient candidates.


Another embodiment of this invention is the contouring or configuring of the bottom of the retractor in order to meet the requirements of certain operation procedures and/or permit the retractor to be positioned closer to the target. This invention contemplates angling the tip in both a cylindrical and ovoid shaped retractor and/or locating a tunnel in the bottom thereof which allows for a rod or implant to be passed through the distal tip of the cannula and into a pedicle screw.


While much has been accomplished in the medical field to limit tissue disruption, use minimal incisions, reduce the hospital stay and increase the speed in which the patient recovers, this invention is intended to raise the surgical procedure to a higher level. This invention in the field of minimally invasive surgery is particularly efficacious in performing such spinal medical procedures as laminotomy, medial facetectomy, foraminotomy, nerve root retraction, discectomy and the like.


As discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,159,179, supra, atypical procedure in performing a lumbar discectomy is to advance a guidewire through a small incision which is advanced to the inferior edge of the superior lamina. A small incision is then made that extends either cranially or caudally. A dilator is then inserted over the guidewire. Larger diameter dilators are sequentially inserted over each other to increase the opening into the body cavity. Typically the guide wire is removed after the first dilator is installed and eventually the dilators are all removed after the tubular retractor has been inserted over the largest of the dilators. Once these procedures are accomplished, the retractor is locked into position by a retractor clamp that is clamped to a retractor clamping arm which is fixed to a rigid member such as the operating table. This provides an unencumbered zone where the surgeon can perform the medical procedure that was intended to be performed. According to the present invention, the dilators, of course will now conform to the configuration discussed above.


Instead of sizing the cannula to the largest depth that is anticipated in the surgical procedure, the U.S. Pat. No. 6,159,179 patent, supra, teaches providing to the surgeon a series of different sizes in a kit so that the surgeon can measure the depth of the cavity of the patient and select the requisite size from the kit. Hence, the surgeon measures the depth by measuring from the exterior of the cavity to the most interior position in the cavity (inferior edge of the superior lamina) and then selects, for example, either a 10 millimeters (mm), 20 mm, 30 mm, etc. as the situation requires. The dilator retractor will also have the same cross sectional shape as the dilator, but it may have a predetermined configuration at the distal end. This invention improves the state of the art of spinal surgery by expanding the current boundaries of minimally invasive surgery. This provides a new option to patients that would otherwise be delegated to the more disruptive open muscle stripping surgical approaches. The ovoid design with or without the angled distal tip, allows a surgeon greater vertical access without having to be encumbered by unnecessary lateral access.


Also, it is contemplated within the scope of this invention, that the dilator retractor will be provided in a kit where a given configuration will be provided in a series of dilator retractors that have different lengths, so that the depth of the cavity of the patient will determine the particular sized dilator retractor that will be utilized for that procedure.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An object of this invention is to provide a cannula used in minimally invasive technique that is tailored for a patient and pathology.


A feature of this invention is to provide an ovoid shaped retractor and a complementary shaped dilators. Other configurations that are not cylindrical are contemplated within the scope of this invention.


Another feature of this invention is to contour the tip of the distal end of the retractor to match the bone structure in the patient.


Another feature of this invention is to provide an access channel at the distal end of the retractor to allow passage of medical hardware.


Another feature of this invention is to provide retractors that are made from a series of predetermined sizes having tailored contouring that the surgeon can select to match the depth of the cavity in the patient made by the dilator.


The foregoing and other features of the present invention will become more apparent from the following description and accompanying drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of the spine of a patient with the cannula shown in cross section inserted adjacent to the posterior portion of the vertebra and having superimposed the cannula resting on the bone of a prior art configuration;



FIG. 2 is an exploded view in perspective of the non cannulated dilator, a series of graduated increased diameter dilators and the cannula or dilator retractor of this invention;



FIG. 3 is a view in perspective illustrating the non cannulated dilator, the graduated dilators and the dilator retractor stacked over each other as they would appear in the patient and the dilator retractor shown in phantom when the other elements are removed;



FIG. 4 is a schematic illustrating an embodiment of this invention where the dilator retractor is configured with the distal end being slanted to accommodate the bone structure of the patient;



FIG. 5 is a schematic illustration exemplifying another embodiment of this invention where the dilator retractor is configured with a tunnel at the distal end;



FIG. 6 is a schematic illustration exemplifying another embodiment of this invention where the dilator retractor is configured in a funnel shape;



FIG. 7 is a photocopy of a drawing of the posterior view of the 3rd and 4th lumbar vertebrae with a schematic comparison of a circular in cross section configured prior art dilator retractor and the dilator retractor of this invention;



FIG. 8 is a schematic illustration of a series of different sized dilator retractors sized to accommodate different lengths to fit the anatomical dimensions of patients; and



FIG. 9 exemplifies another series of varying length dilator retractors as would available to the surgeon.





These figures merely serve to further clarify and illustrate the present invention and are not intended to limit the scope thereof


DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

While the preferred embodiment of this invention is described herein, it will be appreciated, as one skilled in this art will recognize, that the invention although directed toward non-cylindrically shaped dilator retractors, under certain circumstances, the invention contemplates cylindrically shaped dilator retractors where the bottom or distal end is configured to accommodate the shape of the bone structure of the patient or to accommodate different procedures that are available to the surgeon. As for example, the distal end of a cylindrically shaped dilator retractor may be tunneled so as to allow the insertion of an implant. The terms “cannula” and “dilator retractor” have the same meaning and are used herein interchangeably. The term cavity as used herein means the cavity that is created by the dilators and when the dilator retractor is inserted in this cavity it becomes a working channel for the surgeons use in performing the minimal invasive surgery. While the invention is particularly efficacious for use in performing minimal invasive surgery, as would be obvious to any skilled artisan, this invention would also be useful for other types of surgery.


While in the preferred embodiment the description of this invention details the use of a non cannulated dilator of the type described and claimed in the Cross Reference of this patent application and which is incorporated herein by reference, as one skilled in the art will appreciate, this invention also contemplates the use of a guide wire for certain surgical procedures.


To better understand this invention reference is made to the prior art configuration of a dilator retractor as viewed in the target area of a patient. In this example, the patient is inflicted with a herniated disc in the spinal column and the surgeon targets the posterior portion of the vertebra to perform the surgical procedure. The dilator retractor or cannula 10 is inserted in the body and up to where the distal end rests on the bone structure. Obviously, there is a space from left to right between the bone and the end of the dilator retractor and as mentioned above, tufts of muscle remains in or migrates to this area. The surgeon needs to remove this material before performing the procedure for repairing the herniated disc to the discomfort of the patient.


In accordance with one embodiment of this invention and as best seen in FIGS. 2 and 3, a series of dilators 12, including the non-cannula dilator 14 serve to enlarge the cavity of the patient by inserting the first dilator or non-cannula dilator 14 into a incision in the skin of the patient and “working” the cannula dilator 14, a tool (not shown) engaging the proximal end by forcing and rocking it through the fibrous and muscle material until it reaches its target. The cannula dilator is an elongated cylindrical solid body 16 having a tool engaging portion 18 at the proximate end and a pointed tip portion 20 at the distal end. The tip 22 of the pointed tip portion is blunted and slightly rounded so that it is unlike the tip of a common sewing needle, i.e. not razor sharp. The other dilators 12, being progressively shorter in length are all similarly constructed. Namely, they all are hollow so that each progressively shorter dilator passes over the previously inserted dilator and have a tool engaging end portion 24 at the proximate end and a beveled end portion 26 at the distal end that fares into a sharp edge at the bottom thereof. The dilators function is well known and for the sake of convenience and brevity need not be detailed herein. The inventive aspect of the dilators 12 is that they are configured in an elliptical or ovoid shape in cross section and the circumferential dimension between the tool engaging portion 24 and the beveled end portion 26. The hollow portion of each of the dilators 18 are configured to complement the outer surface of the preceding dilator and in the instance of the non cannula dilator 14, the hollow portion of the next succeeding dilator 12 is circular in cross section rather than being elliptical in cross section as are the next succeeding dilators 12. After the dilators 12 have been inserted into the patient, the dilator retractor 30 is inserted over the last inserted dilator 12 and forced into position, typically with a template or anvil that fits over the proximate end 32 of the dilator retractor 30. The opposite end portion, similar to the dilators 12 is beveled and fares into a sharp edge 34. The hollow portion or straight through bore 26 is contoured identically to the contour of the preceding dilator 12. FIG. 3 demonstrates the positions of the dilators 12 and the non cannula dilator 14 when finally inserted into the patient. As seen in FIG. 3, the dilators 12 and non cannula dilator 14 are removed leaving the dilator retractor 30 in position. Obviously, the dilator retractor 30 affords a wide channel for the surgeon to pass his instruments therethrough allowing the surgeon to perform the surgical procedure while providing sufficient opening to permit the use of a microscope and lighting to view the area of the target.


As mentioned in the Background section of this patent application, in accordance with this invention the distal ends of the dilator retractors are “tailored” to meet certain criteria resulting from the anatomical structure of the target area of the patient. FIGS. 4, 5, and 6 exemplify examples of what is meant by the term “tailoring” and while these dilator retractors represent the preferred embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in this art that these are merely examples and do not limit the scope of this invention. In FIG. 4, for example, the distal end 40 of dilator retractor 42 is sloped to follow to some degree the slope of the posterior portion of the vertebra. The direction of the slope and the degree of the slope will be predicated on statistical dimensions of these bone structure for a variety of different sized individuals. The cross sectional configuration of the dilator retractor 42 can take any of a number of different shapes, such as elliptical, circular, etc.



FIG. 5 is similar in concept to FIG. 4 except that the dilator retractor 44 includes a cut-out portion 46 at the distal end 48 and side 50 is longer than side 52 or like the dilator retractor 42 depicted in FIG. 4, the bottom portion can be sloped. Since the cut-out portion 46 is made through the side walls and bore of the dilator and dilator retractor it is essentially a cut out of the side walls at diametrical locations at the distal end and hence, defines a lateral passageway or tunnel.


The dilator retractor 54 of FIG. 6 is similar to the dilator retractor depicted in FIG. 4 except that the configuration is funnel shaped. Namely, the upper portion 56 is conically shaped with the wider portion at the proximal end and fares into the cylindrical portion 58. The distal end 60 is sloped similar to the slope in the dilator retractor 42 depicted in FIG. 4. Obviously, the wider proximal end affords a wider channel that is available for use by the surgeon.


It is apparent from the foregoing and particularly with the embodiments depicted in FIGS. 4 and 5, the configuration of the dilator retractors can take many shapes, namely cylindrical, elliptical or even polygon shape. Of course, in the preferred embodiment, the thickness of the wall over the major portion of the dilator retractors are uniform.



FIG. 7 is included to illustrate the comparison of the heretofore known dilator retractors or cannulas and the dilator retractors or cannulas made in accordance with certain embodiments of this invention. FIG. 7 is a photocopy of a drawing of the lumbar vertebrae showing the posterior view. If the surgeon requires an access provided by the dilator retractor to be say, 35 mm, which is approximately 16 mm larger than the current available dilator retractors, the cylindrically shaped dilator retractor would have to be sized with a 35 mm diameter, as depicted by the circle X. Obviously, this sized dilator retractor would not fit into the contour of the vertebral body (spinous process) as it would be too wide in the horizontal direction, although sufficiently wide in the vertical direction. In accordance with this invention the major access of the elliptically shaped dilator retractor illustrated by the oval Z is in this example 35 mm and meets the requirement of the surgeon and the minor axis or narrower portion fits into the channel defined by the bone structure of this portion of the spine. In other words, the dilator retractor is contoured to the anatomical configuration of the patient or in other words is “tailored”. It being noted that the 16 mm cylindrical dilator retractor, although narrow enough in the horizontal direction, is not sufficient in the vertical direction.



FIGS. 8 and 9 exemplify embodiments of this invention where the particular “tailored” shape of the dilator retractor is provided in kits of different lengths to match the depth of the cavity of the working area of the patient. The kit may contain any number of sizes or alternatively, a facility, like a hospital, may inventory a given number of sizes and shapes of the dilator retractor. In the embodiment depicted in FIG. 8 a series of different length dilator retractors or cannulas 70 with the tunnel shaped distal end portion 72 are disclosed as a preferred embodiment and in FIG. 9 a series of different length ovoid dilator retractors 74 are depicted.


What has been shown by this invention is a novel, unique and functional dilator retractor that is “tailored” to meet the anatomical configuration of the patient. In addition, each of the configured dilator retractors are sized so that they conform to the depth of the cavity in which they are inserted into the patient. In addition to the benefits of these configured dilator retractors that have been enumerated above, these dilator retractors and the dilators associated therewith, afford opportunities to the surgeon to operate in areas of the spine that were not operable with minimal invasive surgery heretofore or at best were operable with a given risk.


Although this invention has been shown and described with respect to detailed embodiments thereof, it will be appreciated and understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail thereof may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the claimed invention.

Claims
  • 1. A cannula comprising: a proximal end;a distal end spaced apart a distance from the proximal end, the distal end being sloped such that the cannula has a short side and a long side; anda lumen extending from the proximal end to the distal end, the lumen defining a working channel having a length sufficient to at least span from a skin incision to proximate a vertebra;opposed cut-outs formed in the distal end and defining a lateral passageway oriented at an angle to the working channel, the opposed cut-outs being formed between the short side and the long side of the cannula.
  • 2. The cannula of claim 1, wherein the lateral passageway is oriented generally perpendicular to the working channel.
  • 3. The cannula of claim 1, wherein the lateral passageway is sized to pass an implant therethrough.
  • 4. The cannula of claim 1, wherein the lateral passageway is sized to pass a spinal rod therethrough.
  • 5. A dilator for use in surgery, comprising: an elongate body having a lumen extending therethrough between proximal and distal ends thereof, the lumen defining a working channel having a length sufficient to at least span from a skin incision to proximate a vertebra;the distal end of the elongate body having a sloped configuration such that the elongate body has a short side end a long side to facilitate positioning of the distal end against a vertebra; andopposed out-outs formed in the distal end between the short side and the long side, the opposed cut-outs defining a passageway adapted to receive a tool therethrough when the distal end of the elongate body is placed against a vertebra.
US Referenced Citations (140)
Number Name Date Kind
569839 Roeloffs Oct 1896 A
3470872 Grieshaber Oct 1969 A
3875595 Froning Apr 1975 A
4232660 Coles Nov 1980 A
4440168 Warren Apr 1984 A
4481947 Chester Nov 1984 A
4545374 Jacobson Oct 1985 A
4573448 Kambin Mar 1986 A
4617922 Griggs Oct 1986 A
4620460 Gonzales, Jr. Nov 1986 A
4736738 Lipovsek Apr 1988 A
4747394 Watanabe May 1988 A
4798111 Cheeseman Jan 1989 A
4803976 Frigg Feb 1989 A
4817587 Janese Apr 1989 A
4862891 Smith Sep 1989 A
4863423 Wallace Sep 1989 A
4882958 McNeeley Nov 1989 A
5035232 Lutze Jul 1991 A
5048379 Gramera Sep 1991 A
5052373 Michelson Oct 1991 A
5084043 Hertzmann Jan 1992 A
5098435 Stednitz Mar 1992 A
5106376 Mononen et al. Apr 1992 A
5133720 Greenberg Jul 1992 A
5135525 Biscoping Aug 1992 A
5148724 Rexford Sep 1992 A
5158543 Lazarus Oct 1992 A
5171279 Mathews Dec 1992 A
5195541 Obenchain Mar 1993 A
5275611 Behl Jan 1994 A
5279567 Ciaglia Jan 1994 A
5292309 Van Tassel Mar 1994 A
5303694 Mikhail Apr 1994 A
5312360 Behl May 1994 A
5356413 Martins et al. Oct 1994 A
5363841 Coker Nov 1994 A
5431639 Shaw Jul 1995 A
5431651 Goble Jul 1995 A
D361381 Koros Aug 1995 S
5439464 Shapiro Aug 1995 A
5472426 Bonati et al. Dec 1995 A
5489274 Chu et al. Feb 1996 A
5512038 O'Neal Apr 1996 A
5569248 Mathews Oct 1996 A
5601550 Esser Feb 1997 A
5611778 Brinon Mar 1997 A
5687739 McPherson Nov 1997 A
5716415 Steffee Feb 1998 A
5728097 Mathews Mar 1998 A
5743853 Lauderdale Apr 1998 A
5746720 Stouder, Jr. May 1998 A
5766221 Benderev Jun 1998 A
5792044 Foley et al. Aug 1998 A
D399955 Koros Oct 1998 S
5816257 Chin Oct 1998 A
RE36020 Moore Dec 1998 E
5851207 Cesarone Dec 1998 A
5882344 Stouder, Jr. Mar 1999 A
5885300 Tokuhashi Mar 1999 A
5891147 Moskovitz Apr 1999 A
5895352 Kleiner Apr 1999 A
5895390 Moran Apr 1999 A
5897593 Kohrs Apr 1999 A
5899901 Middleton May 1999 A
5902231 Foley May 1999 A
5913818 Co Jun 1999 A
5928139 Koros Jul 1999 A
5944658 Koros Aug 1999 A
5954635 Foley et al. Sep 1999 A
5954671 O'Neill Sep 1999 A
5967970 Cowan Oct 1999 A
5971920 Nagel Oct 1999 A
5976146 Ogawa et al. Nov 1999 A
5996447 Bayouth Dec 1999 A
6007487 Foley Dec 1999 A
6010520 Pattison Jan 2000 A
6033406 Mathews Mar 2000 A
6063088 Winslow May 2000 A
6080155 Michelson Jun 2000 A
6081741 Hollis Jun 2000 A
6083225 Winslow Jul 2000 A
6113602 Sand Sep 2000 A
6120434 Kimura Sep 2000 A
6120506 Kohrs Sep 2000 A
D433296 Yamakawa Nov 2000 S
6152871 Foley Nov 2000 A
6156006 Brosens Dec 2000 A
6159179 Simonson Dec 2000 A
6162170 Foley et al. Dec 2000 A
6162236 Osada Dec 2000 A
D436513 Yamakawa Jan 2001 S
6176823 Foley Jan 2001 B1
D438074 Marr Feb 2001 S
6197002 Peterson Mar 2001 B1
6206822 Foley et al. Mar 2001 B1
6206826 Mathews Mar 2001 B1
6206885 Ghahremani Mar 2001 B1
6214004 Coker Apr 2001 B1
6217509 Foley et al. Apr 2001 B1
6224597 Coker May 2001 B1
6224608 Ciccolella May 2001 B1
6245072 Zdeblick Jun 2001 B1
6258097 Cook Jul 2001 B1
6267763 Castro Jul 2001 B1
6270498 Michaelson Aug 2001 B1
6283966 Houfburg Sep 2001 B1
6287313 Sasso Sep 2001 B1
6296609 Brau Oct 2001 B1
6312432 Leppelmeier Nov 2001 B1
6342057 Brace Jan 2002 B1
6348058 Melkent Feb 2002 B1
6354176 Nordlin Mar 2002 B1
6371959 Trice Apr 2002 B1
6371968 Kogasaka Apr 2002 B1
6418821 Yamakawa Jul 2002 B1
6428472 Haas Aug 2002 B1
6461330 Miyagi Oct 2002 B1
D466766 Marty Dec 2002 S
6520907 Foley Feb 2003 B1
6530926 Davison Mar 2003 B1
6540756 Vaughan Apr 2003 B1
6692434 Ritland Feb 2004 B1
6793656 Mathews Sep 2004 B1
20010012942 Estes Aug 2001 A1
20010027320 Sasso Oct 2001 A1
20020011135 Hall Jan 2002 A1
20020016592 Branch Feb 2002 A1
20020022764 Smith Feb 2002 A1
20020049368 Ritland Apr 2002 A1
20020058948 Arlettaz May 2002 A1
20020077632 Tsou Jun 2002 A1
20020082695 Neumann Jun 2002 A1
20020123668 Ritland Sep 2002 A1
20020143235 Pagliuca Oct 2002 A1
20030083689 Simonson May 2003 A1
20030187431 Simonson Oct 2003 A1
20030220689 Ritland Nov 2003 A1
20030236447 Ritland Dec 2003 A1
20040106997 Lieberson Jun 2004 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
WO 0018306 Apr 2000 WO
WO 02060330 Aug 2002 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20030083688 A1 May 2003 US