A conformable energy absorber interposed between a substrate and an impacting object cushions mechanical forces sustained as a consequence of impact. Partial or complete absorption of such forces protects the impacting object such as the head of a vehicle occupant, the protected substrate such as a seat frame or both.
Automotive seats assemblies and restraint systems have long been used with active systems, such as airbags, in an attempt to minimize the risk of serious injury to vehicle occupants involved in a crash. These crashes include frontal, rear, side, rollover and combinations thereof that impart forces on the occupant in numerous directions. The occupants of these vehicles vary in size, weight, and height, and girth. Additionally, seat adjustments create further complexities of occupant positioning relative to the adjacent structures. The combinations of impact speed, impact type, occupant size, and occupant position create a nearly infinite number of impact scenarios which could never practically be tested for. Government and Insurance agencies have created test protocols to cover the most likely impact scenarios. However, serious injuries and fatalities still occur.
Seat manufacturers are continuously challenged to reduce the profile of the seat in an effort to increase the volume of space available for the occupant. As these seat assemblies decrease in thickness, less stroke is provided for impact management in the assembly, thereby necessitating higher efficiency in energy absorbing performance so that more energy can be absorbed in less space. Large foam buns have traditionally been used for both comfort and energy management. However, foam has proven to be less than ideal as an energy absorber due to its slow ramp up in load and poor crush efficiency. Furthermore, the foam density one would choose based on comfort characteristics is far too soft for energy management during a vehicle crash. Therefore a second stage energy absorber is desirable that has improved energy management properties and crush efficiency over the prior art with the resiliency to withstand every day operating loads that are less than one would experience in a vehicle crash.
Automotive interior systems, including vehicle seats, seat backs, consoles, door trim, pillar trim and other interior panels, are designed to withstand the day to day abuse they are likely to see in practical use. The driver's seat in particular, must be capable of withstanding tens of thousands of ingresses and egresses in conjunction with supporting the driver during the operation of the vehicle. Fabric or leather covered polyurethane (PU) foam has been traditionally been used in conjunction with a metal seat frame supporting structure to satisfy both comfort and crash criteria. Mechanical adjusters, heating, cooling, and airbags are also integrated into the seat assembly to enhance comfort and crash characteristics.
Efforts made with PU foam in particular to enhance the performance of the foam system for both comfort and crash include two main groups. Group one consists of using a reactive “dual” density approach where one density is used for comfort and one or more densities are molded for energy absorption following a crash. These may utilize not only changes in density but chemistry as well to obtain desired performance characteristics or both in the seat bun and the seat back. Group two consists of insert molding another foam component, made of EPP foam or some other foam type, and foaming the comfort PU foam around these energy§ absorbing foam components. Group two provides more flexibility to optimize the system crash performance and manage the loads the occupant experiences in a crash. These include changing the shape, density, chemistry, and position of these energy absorbing materials within the foam bun. However, there is still a need to address the inherent inefficiency of prior art foam energy absorbers.
Interior trim parts often cover structural members that are rigid with blunt edges. These structural members may be in the vicinity of the occupant during daily use as well as in a crash event. Contact with these members in a crash could result in serious injury. Therefore, it is desirable to have an energy absorbing structure which would cushion the occupant during an impact, mitigate some of the impacting forces and reduce the risk of serious injury. Ideally, this energy absorbing structure would be engineered in such a way that it would be able to adapt to the shapes of various structural members one would like to protect. In this way, one tool could produce a product that could be applied to a variety of structural members.
One aspect of the disclosure includes a multi-faceted energy absorber that lies adjacent to or covers in whole or part a substrate such as but not limited to an automobile seat frame. The absorber when positioned and or secured appropriately cushions a blow in that it protects the substrate, the impacting object or both from damage or injury consequent to impact.
In several embodiments, there is provided an energy absorber with a flexible spine that can be molded in a relatively linear configuration yet has flexibility about one or more axes so as to be bent and thus conform to the mating part. Preferably, the spine can be configured to bend up to 180 degrees about one or more axes depending upon the shape of the structure to be protected. Flexibility between energy absorbing units in combination with the shape and spacing of a trim line between units is also provided.
In
The spine includes a number (N) of energy absorbing modules 18, 20, 22, 24, . . . (
Whether manufactured by such processes as thermoforming, vacuum forming or injection molding, an aperture 38 is defined in the base 36 (
As shown in
Supporting adjacent coalesced energy absorbing units 32, 34 is a shoulder 44 (
In some embodiments, each energy absorbing module has an average energy absorbing characteristic (E), the average energy absorbing characteristics (E1, E2) of adjacent energy absorbing modules being the same or different so that the spine 12 has a gradient of energy absorbing characteristics.
In one exemplary embodiment, N=2 and L=1 so that there are two energy absorbing vertebral members 30 in the spine 12. In another case, U=2 so that there is a pair of energy absorbing units 32, 34 in the vertebral member 30.
If the situation warrants it, the shoulder 44 is concave (
To promote stiffness, a rib 46 can optionally be provided that extends between the curvilinear walls 40 of energy absorbing units 32, 34 in adjacent vertebral members 30 in a module. Preferably, the rib 46 has a ceiling 48 that is above the bottom 42 of an energy absorbing unit 32, 34.
It will be appreciated that a skirt 50 (
As suggested in
Referring to
Thus, in several embodiments, there is provided an energy absorber 10 or assembly 54 with one or more flexible spines 12, 54, 58 that can be molded in a relatively linear configuration. The absorber 10 has flexibility about one or more axes so as to contort and conform to the mating part. Preferably, the spine 12 can be configured to bend up to 180 degrees about one or more axes depending upon the shape of the structure 14 to be protected. Flexibility between modules or energy absorbing units within a module in combination with the shape and spacing of a trim line between units is also provided.
In one embodiment, a spine section 12 is provided without an interconnecting rib 46. This spine section 12 is most flexible about its longitudinal axis. A spine section 12 with an interconnecting rib 46 is most flexible at angles to either side of the spine 12 since the rib 46 provides a collapsing or expanding section that can distort between energy absorbing units 32, 34. By either imparting ribbed sections or eliminating ribbed sections along the longitudinal axis of the spine 12 in combination with the trim profile, the absorber 10 can be molded linearly in one die draw but compelled to bend as desired to protect a particular member 14. Rectangular absorbers in one die draw offer more favorable forming economics and minimize tool complexity.
Some means of retaining the absorber 12 in its installed position is desirable. The product may be in-molded during the foaming cycle wherein the absorber(s) 10 is positioned in the mold prior to foaming. Using a foam locating scheme relative to a seat frame for example serves to position the energy absorber 12 relative to the frame 14. Other traditional means for attaching may also be selected such as welding, snapping, push pins, clips, Velcro and the like.
In some embodiments (see, e.g.,
Preferably, the energy absorber 12 is molded in the same step as molding the seat component 52. The energy absorber 12 can then be coordinated with a seat component 52 such as the cushion about the skirt 50. Optionally, a tether is provided which allows the energy absorber 12 to coordinate with the seat component, e.g., cushion 52. As used herein the term “tether” includes a connection seam 56 alone or a structure with an elongate spacer 58 having a flexible or rigid connection seam 56 at either or both ends.
In another embodiment (
In practice, one tool may produce energy absorbers that can wrap around complex geometries 14 like seat back frames, headrest frames, 90 degree metal corners, etc. and apply to multiple programs, thereby minimizing tooling investment. For example, a right/left tool might be used to make an energy absorber 12 for seat backs and frames and an up/down tool might be used for corners and trim. Such absorbers can be insert-molded during the foaming process. If desired, polypropylene components can be welded to the interior trim. Thus there is provided a common tool for multiple applications.
Additionally, several embodiments of the invention have proven to be more efficient than foam in absorbing energy. The space saved can be used to improve safety, and create a more spacious interior, especially in shorter cars and lighter weight vehicles.
As required, detailed embodiments of the present invention are disclosed herein; however, it is to be understood that the disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary of the invention that may be embodied in various and alternative forms. The figures are not necessarily to scale; some features may be exaggerated or minimized to show details of particular components. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present invention.
While exemplary embodiments are described above, it is not intended that these embodiments describe all possible forms of the invention. Rather, the words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is understood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Additionally, the features of various implementing embodiments may be combined to form further embodiments of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1784511 | Carns | Dec 1930 | A |
2090881 | Wilson | Aug 1937 | A |
2391997 | Noble | Jan 1946 | A |
3011602 | Ensrud | Dec 1961 | A |
3018015 | Agriss et al. | Jan 1962 | A |
3071216 | Jones et al. | Jan 1963 | A |
3196763 | Rushton | Jul 1965 | A |
3231454 | Williams | Jan 1966 | A |
3535663 | Herzog et al. | Oct 1970 | A |
3605145 | Graebe | Sep 1971 | A |
3938963 | Hale | Feb 1976 | A |
4072334 | Seegmiller et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4597601 | Manning | Jul 1986 | A |
4890877 | Ashtiani-Zarandi et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
5150935 | Glance et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5390467 | Shuert | Feb 1995 | A |
5391251 | Shuert | Feb 1995 | A |
5401347 | Shuert | Mar 1995 | A |
5444959 | Tesch | Aug 1995 | A |
5470641 | Shuert | Nov 1995 | A |
5549327 | Rusche et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5572804 | Skaja et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
6017084 | Carroll, III et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6098313 | Skaja | Aug 2000 | A |
6142563 | Townsend et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6199937 | Zetouna | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6199942 | Carroll, III et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6221292 | Carroll, III | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6247745 | Carroll, III et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6406081 | Mahfet et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6443513 | Glance | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453476 | Moore, III et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6550850 | Laborie et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6669251 | Trappe | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6679967 | Carroll, III et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6681907 | Le | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6682128 | Carroll, III et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6726262 | Marijnissen et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6733064 | Byma et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6746061 | Evans | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6749784 | Blanchon | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6752450 | Carroll, III et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6777062 | Skaja | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6848730 | Evans | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6863322 | Hunter et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6923494 | Shuler et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6926321 | Zipfel | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6938936 | Mooijman et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7073831 | Evans | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7328462 | Straus | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7360822 | Cormier et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7377577 | Cormier et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7384095 | Cormier et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7404593 | Cormier et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7625023 | Audi et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7628444 | Cormier et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7676854 | Berger et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7731292 | Ishijima et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7766386 | Spingler | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7802320 | Morgan | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7895681 | Ferrara | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7908678 | Brine, III et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7954177 | Ide et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7958573 | Lewis, Jr. et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8201671 | Cho | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8465087 | Gerwolls et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
20020017805 | Carroll, III et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020113459 | Laborie et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030080573 | Marijnissen et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040036302 | Shuler et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040094977 | Shuler et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040174025 | Converse et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050057053 | Evans et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050161982 | Cormier et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050230204 | Tamada et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050230205 | Springler et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050269824 | Steeg et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060028038 | Glasgow et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070228745 | Cormier et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080120764 | Sajic | May 2008 | A1 |
20100244469 | Gerwolls et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100299812 | Maddux et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100326782 | Vandenberge et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19947245 | Apr 2000 | DE |
0434834 | Jul 1991 | EP |
0630592 | Dec 1994 | EP |
0863056 | Sep 1998 | EP |
1555109 | Jul 2005 | EP |
2870802 | Dec 2005 | FR |
136582 | Oct 1975 | JP |
9150692 | Nov 1995 | JP |
08085404 | Apr 1996 | JP |
11348699 | Dec 1999 | JP |
20060065554 | Jun 2006 | KR |
0031434 | Jun 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and the Written Opinion, International application No. PCT/US06/13656; Applicant Oakwood Energy Management, Inc. |
European Search Report and the Written Opinion, for Application No. 06112732.0-2412; dated Aug. 16, 2006, Applicant Oakwood Energy Management, Inc., 9 pages. |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion, International application No. PCT/US/2012/070006; date of mailing Feb. 15, 2013. |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion, International application No. 2013/036703; date of mailing Jul. 19, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150232053 A1 | Aug 2015 | US |