The invention described herein relates to conjugates and compositions for imaging, diagnosing, and/or monitoring diseases using radionuclide-based imaging. In particular, the invention described herein relates to conjugates and compositions for imaging, diagnosing, and/or monitoring diseases using positron emission tomography.
Positron emission tomography (PET) is a nuclear imaging methodology that detects pairs of gamma rays emitted indirectly by a positron-producing radionuclide. Because the two emitted gamma rays travel in exactly opposite directions, it is possible to locate their site of origin and thereby reconstruct a three-dimensional image of all positron emitters from a computer analysis of the origins of emitted gamma rays.
Vitamin receptors are overexpressed on certain cells, including many cancer cell types, activated macrophages, and activated monocytes. In particular, folate receptors are overexpressed on many cancers. The folate receptor, a 38 KD GPI-anchored protein that binds the vitamin folic acid with high affinity (<1 nM), is overexpressed on many malignant tissues, including ovarian, breast, bronchial, and brain cancers. It is estimated that 95% of all ovarian carcinomas overexpress the folate receptor. In contrast, with the exception of kidney, choroid plexus, and placenta, normal tissues express low or non-detectable levels of the folate receptor. Most cells also use an unrelated reduced folate carrier to acquire the necessary folic acid.
Following receptor binding of vitamins to vitamin receptors, such as folic acid and analogs and derivatives of folic acid to folate receptors, rapid endocytosis delivers the vitamin into the cell, where it is unloaded in an endosomal compartment at lower pH. Importantly, covalent conjugation of small molecules, proteins, and even liposomes to vitamins and other vitamin receptor binding ligands does not block the ability of the ligand to bind to its receptor, and therefore, such conjugates can readily be delivered to and can enter cells by receptor-mediated endocytosis. Accordingly, imaging agents can be targeted to vitamin receptors, including the folate receptor, for delivery into vitamin receptor expressing cells.
The prostate is a male reproductive organ that functions to produce and store seminal fluid, which provides nutrients and fluids for the survival of sperm introduced into the vagina during reproduction. Like other tissues, the prostate gland may develop either malignant (cancerous) or benign (non-cancerous) tumors. Prostate cancer is reportedly one of the most common male cancers in western societies, and is the second leading form of malignancy among American men.
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a biomarker that is overexpressed on prostate cancer cells. PSMA is over-expressed in malignant prostate tissues when compared to other organs in the human body such as kidney, proximal small intestine, and salivary glands. PSMA is also expressed on the neovasculature within many non-prostate solid tumors, including lung, colon, breast, renal, liver and pancreatic carcinomas, but not on normal vasculature. PSMA is a type II cell surface membrane-bound glycoprotein with ˜110 kD molecular weight, including an intracellular segment (amino acids 1-18), a transmembrane domain (amino acids 19-43), and an extensive extracellular domain (amino acids 44-750). Though the functions of the intracellular segment and the transmembrane domains are currently reported to be insignificant, the extracellular domain is involved in several distinct activities. For example, PSMA plays a role in the central nervous system, where it metabolizes N-acetyl-aspartyl glutamate (NAAG) into glutamic and N-acetyl aspartic acid. PSMA also plays a role in the proximal small intestine where it removes γ-linked glutamate from poly-γ-glutamated folate and α-linked glutamate from peptides and small molecules.
Though the particular function of PSMA on prostate cancer cells remains unresolved, PSMA is known to undergo rapid internalization into the cell, similar to cell surface bound receptors like vitamin receptors. PSMA is internalized through clathrin-coated pits and subsequently can either recycle to the cell surface or enter lysosomes. Accordingly, imaging agents can be targeted to PSMA for delivery into PSMA expressing cells, such as prostate cancer cells.
It has been discovered herein that the conjugates and compositions described herein, comprising folate or a PSMA ligand, are useful for targeting and delivering radionuclides for diagnosing, imaging, and/or monitoring various diseases using PET imaging.
Several illustrative embodiments are described by the following clauses:
1. A conjugate of the formula
or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
2. A conjugate of the formula
or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
3. A conjugate of the formula
or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
4. A conjugate of the formula
or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
5. A conjugate of the formula
or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
6. The conjugate, or pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, of any of the preceding clauses wherein the conjugate, or pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, is complexed with a radionuclide.
7. The conjugate, or pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, of clause 6 wherein the radionuclide is a positron emitting radionuclide.
8. The conjugate, or pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, of clause 6 or 7 wherein the radionuclide is a metal ion.
9. The conjugate, or pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, of clause 8 wherein the metal ion is selected from the group consisting of 89Zr, 45Ti, 51Mn, 64Cu, 62Cu, 61Cn, 60Cu, 63Zn, 82Rb, 86Y, 68Ga, and 66Ga ions.
10. The conjugate, or pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, of any one of clause 8 to 9 wherein the metal ion is a gallium ion.
11. The conjugate, or pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, of any one of clauses 8 to 10 wherein the metal ion is a 66Ga ion.
12. The conjugate, or pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, of any one of clauses 8 to 10 wherein the metal ion is a 68Ga ion.
13. The conjugate, or pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, of any one of clauses 8 to 9 wherein the metal ion is a zirconium ion.
14. The conjugate, or pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, of clause 13 wherein the metal ion is an 89Zr ion.
15. The conjugate, or pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, of any one of clauses 8 to 9 wherein the metal ion is a copper ion.
16. The conjugate, or pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, of clause 15 wherein the metal ion is a 64Cu ion.
17. A composition comprising the conjugate, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, of any one of clauses 1 to 16, and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier therefor.
18. A kit comprising the conjugate, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, of any one of clauses 1 to 17.
In accordance with the disclosure herein, the embodiments of the enumerated clauses provided in the Summary above, or any combination thereof, are contemplated for combination with any of the embodiments described in the Detailed Description section of this patent application.
In one illustrative and non-limiting embodiment described herein, conjugates and compositions described herein are used for diagnosing, imaging, and/or monitoring various diseases. In another embodiment, uses of conjugates and compositions are described herein for manufacturing medicaments for imaging, diagnosing, and/or monitoring various diseases. In another embodiment, uses of the conjugates and compositions described herein for imaging, diagnosing, and/or monitoring various diseases are provided. In another embodiment, kits are described herein for preparing and/or using the conjugates and compositions described herein for imaging, diagnosing, and/or monitoring various diseases.
The conjugates and compositions described herein are used to image, diagnose, and/or monitor various diseases, such as cancer. In one embodiment, the conjugates or compositions described herein can be used for both human clinical medicine and veterinary applications. Thus, a “patient” can be administered the conjugates or compositions described herein, and the patient can be human or, in the case of veterinary applications, can be a laboratory, agricultural, domestic, or wild animal. In one aspect, the patient can be a human, a laboratory animal such as a rodent (e.g., mice, rats, hamsters, etc.), a rabbit, a monkey, a chimpanzee, a domestic animal such as a dog or a cat, an agricultural animal such as a cow, a horse, a pig, a sheep, a goat, and a wild animal in captivity such as a bear, a panda, a lion, a tiger, a leopard, an elephant, a zebra, a giraffe, a gorilla, a dolphin, and a whale.
In various embodiments, the cancers described herein can be cancers that are tumorigenic, including benign tumors and malignant tumors, or the cancer can be non-tumorigenic. In another embodiment, the cancer can arise spontaneously or by such processes as mutations present in the germline of the patient or by somatic mutations, or the cancer can be chemically-, virally-, or radiation-induced. Exemplary cancers include, but are not limited to, a carcinoma, a sarcoma, a lymphoma, a melanoma, a mesothelioma, a nasopharyngeal carcinoma, a leukemia, an adenocarcinoma, and a myeloma.
In some aspects, the cancer can be lung cancer, bone cancer, pancreatic cancer, skin cancer, cancer of the head, cancer of the neck, cutaneous melanoma, intraocular melanoma uterine cancer, ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer, rectal cancer, stomach cancer, colon cancer, breast cancer, triple negative breast cancer, carcinoma of the fallopian tubes, carcinoma of the endometrium, carcinoma of the cervix, Hodgkin's Disease, cancer of the esophagus, cancer of the small intestine, cancer of the endocrine system, cancer of the thyroid gland, cancer of the parathyroid gland, non-small cell lung cancer, cancer of the adrenal gland, sarcoma of soft tissue, cancer of the urethra, prostate cancer, leukemia, lymphoma, pleural mesothelioma, cancer of the bladder, Burkitt's lymphoma, cancer of the ureter, cancer of the kidney, neoplasms of the central nervous system, brain cancer, pituitary adenoma, or adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction.
In various embodiments, the conjugates used for imaging, diagnosing and/or monitoring diseases, such as cancer, can be a conjugate of the formula
or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof,
or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof,
or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof,
or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, or
or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
In each of the conjugate and composition embodiments described herein, the formulae may include not only all pharmaceutically acceptable salts of the conjugates, but also may include any and all hydrates and/or solvates of the conjugates. In another embodiment, certain functional groups, such as the hydroxy, amino, and like groups form complexes and/or coordination compounds with water and/or various solvents, in the various physical forms of the conjugates described herein. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the above formulae are to be understood to be a description of such hydrates and/or solvates, including pharmaceutically acceptable solvates.
In each of the foregoing and each of the following embodiments, the conjugates described herein may include each possible isomer, such as stereoisomers and geometric isomers, both individually and in any and all possible mixtures, of the formulae described herein. In each of the foregoing and each of the following embodiments, the conjugates may include any and all crystalline forms, partially crystalline forms, and non-crystalline and/or amorphous forms of the conjugates.
As used herein, the term “solvates” refers to conjugates described herein complexed with a solvent molecule. In one embodiment, the conjugates described herein may form such complexes with solvents by simply mixing the conjugates with a solvent, or dissolving the conjugates in a solvent. In the embodiment where the conjugates are to be used as pharmaceuticals, such solvents can be pharmaceutically acceptable solvents. In another embodiment, where the conjugates are to be used as pharmaceuticals, the relative amount of solvent that forms the solvate should be less than established guidelines for such pharmaceutical uses, such as less than International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) Guidelines. In yet another embodiment, the solvates may be isolated from excess solvent by evaporation, precipitation, and/or crystallization. In some embodiments, the solvates are amorphous, and in other embodiments, the solvates are crystalline.
In the conjugates described herein, the imaging moiety for producing, for example, a PET image may include one or more positron-emitting radionuclides, such as, but not limited to, radionuclides selected from the group consisting of 89Zr, 45Ti, 51Mn, 64Cu, 62CU, 61CU, 60Cu, 63Zn, 82Rb, 86Y, 68Ga, and 66Ga. In another embodiment, the radionuclide is a metal ion, such as a positron-emitting metal ion. In another embodiment, the radionuclide is a gallium ion, such as a positron-emitting gallium ion. In another embodiment, the radionuclide is selected from the group consisting of 89Zr, 64Cu, 68Ga, and 66Ga. In another illustrative embodiment, the radionuclide is selected from the group consisting of 89Zr, 64Cu, and 68Ga. In another embodiment, the radionuclide is 68Ga or 89Zr. In another embodiment in each of the foregoing and following embodiments described herein, the radionuclide is 68Ga. In another embodiment in each of the foregoing and following embodiments described herein, the radionuclide is 89Zr. In another embodiment in each of the foregoing and following embodiments described herein, the radionuclide is 64Cu. In one aspect, factors that may influence selection of a suitable radionuclide include sufficient half-life of the positron-emitting radionuclide to permit preparation of a diagnostic composition in a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier prior to administration to the patient, and sufficient remaining half-life to yield sufficient activity to permit extra-corporeal imaging by a PET scan. In yet another aspect, a suitable radionuclide should have a sufficiently short half-life to limit patient exposure to unnecessary radiation.
Illustrative positron-decaying radionuclides having suitable half-lives include 45Ti, half-life about 3 hours; 61Cu, half-life about 3.4 hours; 63Zn, half-life about 38 minutes; 82Rb, half-life about 2 minutes; 68Ga, half-life about 68 minutes, 66Ga, half-life about 9.5 hours; and 89Zr, half-life about 78.4 hours.
In other embodiments, pharmaceutically acceptable salts of the conjugates are described. In one aspect, pharmaceutically acceptable salts of the conjugates described herein include acid addition and base salts thereof. Suitable acid addition salts are formed from acids which form non-toxic salts. Illustrative examples include the acetate, aspartate, benzoate, besylate, bicarbonate/carbonate, bisulphate/sulphate, borate, camsylate, citrate, edisylate, esylate, formate, fumarate, gluceptate, gluconate, glucuronate, hexafluorophosphate, hibenzate, hydrochloride/chloride, hydrobromide/bromide, hydroiodide/iodide, isethionate, lactate, malate, maleate, malonate, mesylate, methylsulphate, naphthylate, 2-napsylate, nicotinate, nitrate, orotate, oxalate, palmitate, pamoate, phosphate/hydrogen phosphate/dihydrogen phosphate, saccharate, stearate, succinate, tartrate, tosylate and trifluoroacetate salts. Suitable base salts of the conjugates described herein are formed from bases which form non-toxic salts. Illustrative examples include the arginine, benzathine, calcium, choline, diethylamine, diolamine, glycine, lysine, magnesium, meglumine, olamine, potassium, sodium, tromethamine and zinc salts. Hemisalts of acids and bases may also be formed, for example, hemisulphate and hemicalcium salts.
In one embodiment, the conjugates described herein may be administered as a formulation in association with one or more pharmaceutically acceptable carriers. In one illustrative aspect, the carriers can be excipients. In one embodiment, the choice of carrier will to a large extent depend on factors such as the particular mode of administration, the effect of the carrier on solubility and stability, and the nature of the dosage form. In one illustrative aspect, pharmaceutically acceptable carriers for the delivery of the conjugates described herein and methods for their preparation will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art. Such compositions and methods for their preparation may be found, for example, in Remington: The Science & Practice of Pharmacy, 21th Edition (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005), incorporated herein by reference. In some embodiments, the carrier is suitable for parenteral administration and can be in a sterile aqueous solution.
In one embodiment, a kit is described comprising any of the conjugates, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, described herein. In one aspect, such a kit can comprise one or more separate pharmaceutical compositions, at least one of which contains a conjugate, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, as described herein. In another embodiment, the kit can comprise a conjugate, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, as described herein and one or more separate compositions for labeling the conjugate, or pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, with, for example, a metal ion. In another embodiment, means for separately retaining the compositions, such as a container, divided bottle, or divided foil packet are included in the kit. In another embodiment, compositions comprising one or more conjugates described herein, in containers having labels that provide instructions for use of the conjugates are described. In another embodiment, the compositions in the kit are in the form of reconstitutable lyophilizates. In another embodiment, the compositions are in liquid form. In yet another embodiment, the compositions are each in a sterile vial or container.
The following examples further illustrate specific embodiments of the invention; however, the following illustrative examples should not be interpreted in any way to limit the invention.
Synthesis of EC2418:
Coupling Steps:
Initial Peptide Synthesis on-Resin:
Commercially available 100-200 mesh peptide-loaded resin was utilized in an AAPPTec-sourced peptide synthesizer equipped with DMF, DMF-Peptide, DMF-PyBOP, DMF-DIPEA, and DMF-piperidine solutions. The desired peptide sequence was programmed into the software interface and run in an automated fashion. Upon completion of the sequence, the peptide-loaded resin was removed from the instrument's reaction flask. Analysis of the resin-peptide was conducted by taking a small quantity of beads, cleaving with TFA and analyzing the filtered solution by LCMS (1-50% ACN/10 mM NH4OAc, pH 5).
Cleavage of Peptide from Resin and Purification:
Peptide was cleaved from the loaded resin by a mixture of 95% TFA, 2.5% TIPS, 2.5% H2O. Resin was subjected to cleavage mixture under Argon for 35 min, drained, followed by treatment with fresh cleavage mixture for 5 min and drained (2×). The combined peptide-TFA solution was diluted with ether to precipitate the peptide and collected by centrifuge. Peptide cake was washed with ether and dried. Crude peptide was suspended in water and Na2CO3 was added and maintained at pH 9-10 for 1 h. The reactions mixture was acidified with 1N HCl to pH 4.0 and purified using a Biotage reverse-phase C18 column (Mobile phase A=0.1% TFA buffer and B=ACN). Product fractions were collected, combined, acetonitrile was removed and the resulting solution freeze-dried to yield EC2418 (496 mg, 62%). LCMS (ESI): [M+H]+=Calculated for C33H41N11O13, 800.29; found 800.36.
Synthesis of EC2419:
To a solution of EC1919 (213 mg, 0.23 mM) in DMSO (3.0 mL) and DIPEA (0.88 mL) was added P-SCN-Bn-Deferoxamine (175 mg, 0.23 mM) in DMSO (4.0 mL). The solution was stirred at ambient temperature under argon for 3 h. Reaction mixture was loaded directly onto a Biotage column (mobile phase A=50 mM ammonium bicarbonate buffer, pH=7.0. B=ACN) for purification. Fractions containing the desired product were collected, combined, acetonitrile was removed and the resulting solution freeze-dried to afford the EC2419 (308 mg, 80.3%) as a light yellow solid. LCMS (ESI): [M+H]+=Calculated for C70H98N20O24S2, 1667.65; found 1667.79.
Synthesis of EC2420:
To a solution of EC2418 (133.9 mg, 0.167 mM) in DMSO (1.0 mL) and DIPEA (0.58 mL) was added P-SCN-Bn-deferoxamine (105 mg, 0.14 mM) in DMSO (3.0 mL) and stirred at ambient temperature under argon for 3 h. Reaction mixture was loaded directly onto a Biotage column (mobile phase A=50 mM ammonium bicarbonate buffer, pH=7.0. B=ACN) for purification. Fractions containing the desired product were collected, combined, acetonitrile was removed and the resulting solution freeze-dried to afford the EC2420 (165 mg, 75.9%) as a light yellow solid. LCMS (ESI): [M+H]+=Calculated for C66H93N19O21S2, 1552.62; found 1552.71.
Synthesis of EC2448:
Coupling Steps:
Initial Peptide Synthesis on-Resin:
Commercially-available 100-200 mesh peptide-loaded resin was utilized in an AAPPTec-sourced peptide synthesizer equipped with DMF, DMF-Peptide, DMF-PyBOP, DMF-DIPEA, and DMF-piperidine solutions. The desired peptide sequence, except EC1380, was programmed into the software interface and run in an automated fashion. Upon completion of the sequence, the peptide-loaded resin was removed from the instrument's reaction flask. Analysis of the resin-peptide was conducted by taking a small quantity of beads, cleaving with TFA and analyzing the filtered solution by LCMS (1-50% ACN/10 mM NH4OAc, pH5).
Addition of Ec1380 to Resin-Bound Peptide:
Resin-bound Peptide obtained through automated synthesis was placed in a traditional bench top solid-phase reaction vessel. N-Fmoc protection was removed using 20% piperidine in DMF under argon for 10 minutes (3×). The resin was then rinsed with DMF (3×), and IPA (3×). The removal of Fmoc was confirmed by Kaiser Test. The resin was then rinsed with DMF (3×) and suspended in DMF, with the addition of 2eq of EC1380, 2eq of PyBOP, and 4eq of DIPEA. After 1-2 h of argon bubbling, the solvent was drained and the resin rinsed with DMF (3×), and IPA (3×). Analysis of the resin-peptide was conducted by taking a small quantity of beads, cleaving with TFA and analyzing the filtered solution by LCMS (1-50% ACN/10 mM NH4OAc, pH5).
Cleavage of Peptide from Resin and Purification:
Peptide was cleaved from the loaded resin by a mixture of 92.5% TFA, 2.5% TIPS, 2.5% H2O, and 2.5% EDT. Resin was subjected to cleavage mixture under Argon for 35 min, drained, followed by treatment with fresh cleavage mixture for 5 min and drained (2×). The resulting peptide-TFA solution was diluted with ether to precipitate the peptide and collected by centrifuge. Peptide cake was washed with ether and dried. Crude peptide was purified using a Biotage reverse-phase C18 column (Mobile phase A=0.1% TFA buffer and B=ACN). Product fractions were collected, combined, acetonitrile was removed and freeze-dried to yield EC2448 (240 mg, 38.5%) LCMS (ESI): [M+H]+=Calculated for C54H74N10O22S, 1247.47; found 1247.51.
Synthesis of EC2450:
To a solution of deferoxamine mesylate (65.7 mg, 0.1 mM) in DMSO (0.3 mL) and DIPEA (0.087 mL) was added β-maleimido-propionic acid N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (26.6 mg, 0.1 mM) in DMSO (0.3 mL) and stirred at ambient temperature under argon for 1 h. Solution of EC2448 (118.5 mg, 0.095 mM) in DMSO (0.5 mL) and DIPEA (0.26 mL) were added and stirred for additional 30 min. Reaction mixture was loaded directly onto a Biotage column (mobile phase A=50 mM ammonium bicarbonate buffer, pH=7.0. B=ACN) for purification. Fractions containing the desired product were collected, combined, acetonitrile was removed and freeze-dried to afford the EC2450 (56 mg, 30.1%, over two steps) as a white solid. LCMS (ESI): [M−2H]2−=Calculated for C86H127N17O33S, 978.54; found 978.55.
Synthesis of EC2458:
To a solution of deferoxamine mesylate (65.7 mg, 0.1 mM) in DMSO (0.3 mL) and DIPEA (0.087 mL) was added β-maleimido-propionic acid N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (26.6 mg, 0.1 mM) in DMSO (0.3 mL) and stirred at ambient temperature under argon for 1 h. Solution of EC1167 (92.8 mg, 0.11 mM) in DMSO (1.0 mL) was added and stirred for additional 3 h. Reaction mixture was loaded directly onto a Biotage column (mobile phase A=50 mM ammonium bicarbonate buffer, pH=7.0. B=ACN) for purification. Fractions containing the desired product were collected, combined, acetonitrile was removed and the resulting solution freeze-dried to afford the EC2458 as a white solid. LCMS (ESI): [M−2H]2−=Calculated for C65H98N14O28S, 776.81; found 776.67.
Synthesis of EC2460:
To a solution of deferoxamine mesylate (65.7 mg, 0.1 mM) in DMSO (0.3 mL) and DIPEA (0.087 mL) was added β-maleimido-propionic acid N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (26.6 mg, 0.1 mM) in DMSO (0.3 mL) and stirred at ambient temperature under argon for 1 h. Solution of EC0652 (116.6 mg, 0.11 mM) in DMSO (0.5 mL) was added and stirred for additional 30 min. Reaction mixture was loaded directly onto a Biotage column (mobile phase A=50 mM ammonium bicarbonate buffer, pH=7.0. B=ACN) for purification. Fractions containing the desired product were collected, combined, acetonitrile was removed and the resulting solution freeze-dried to afford the EC2460 (116 mg, 65.4%, over two steps) as a white solid. LCMS (ESI): [M−2H]2− Calculated for C79H118N16O28S, 884.97; found 884.86.
The deferoxamine conjugates described above may be complexed to a positron emitting metal ion by any of the procedures known to those skilled in the art of producing PET-imaging conjugates and/or compounds.
This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/100,677, filed Jan. 7, 2015, the entirety of which is hereby expressly incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4691024 | Kunikatsu et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4713249 | Schroder | Dec 1987 | A |
5103018 | Motomichi et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5266333 | Cady et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5418982 | Kishi | May 1995 | A |
5627165 | Glazier | May 1997 | A |
5795877 | Jackson et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5863536 | Jackson et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5866679 | DeFeo-Jones et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5902817 | Jackson et al. | May 1999 | A |
5948750 | Garsky et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5962237 | Ts'o et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5962521 | Jackson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5968915 | Jackson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5998362 | Feng et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6054444 | Jackson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6127333 | Brady et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6174858 | Brady et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177404 | DeFeo-Jones et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6232287 | Ruoslahti et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6368598 | D'Amico et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6391305 | Feng et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6428785 | Gocken | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6479470 | Kozikowski et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6528499 | Kozikowski et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6875886 | Frangioni | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6946133 | Schlom et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7008765 | Bussemakers et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7128893 | Leamon et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7129254 | Berger et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7147837 | Lauffer et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7192586 | Bander | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7232805 | Weinshenker et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7361338 | Jakobovits et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7381745 | Kozikowski et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7408079 | Pomper et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7485299 | Afar et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7514078 | Bander et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7534580 | Reeves et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7601332 | Vlahov et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7635682 | Denmeade et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7638122 | Yu et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7659395 | Pajouhesh et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7662795 | Rodriguez et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7696185 | Berkman | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7713944 | Kinberger et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7740847 | Allan et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7767202 | Pardoll et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7767803 | Diener et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7794929 | Baylin et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7872235 | Rousso et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7875586 | Kovbasnjuk et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7879981 | Obata | Feb 2011 | B2 |
RE42275 | Berkman | Apr 2011 | E |
7990533 | Maier et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8000773 | Rousso et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8101369 | Nam et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8101713 | Cuello et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8105568 | Vlahov et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8153595 | Chen | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8211402 | Babich et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8211473 | Troiano et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8211635 | Barton | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8258111 | Shen et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8404817 | Sherman et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8414898 | Afar et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8445851 | Rousso et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8450290 | Worm et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8465725 | Babich et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8507434 | Popel et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8557772 | Popel et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8606349 | Rousso et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8644910 | Rousso et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8685891 | Muraca | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8703918 | Colombatti et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8772226 | Denmeade et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8772459 | Ho et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8816095 | Brown et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8852630 | Spiegel et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8859509 | Spiegel et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8877970 | Zimmerman et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8940871 | Wu et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8946388 | Sahin et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8987319 | Miller | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9044468 | Pomper et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9242012 | Ma et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9278067 | Boulikas | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9636413 | Vlahov et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
20010031252 | Low et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020001782 | Watanabe et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020055121 | Vielkind | May 2002 | A1 |
20020103136 | Feng | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020115596 | Garsky et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020132983 | Junghans | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030035804 | D'Amico et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030086900 | Low et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030133927 | DeFeo-Jones et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030138432 | Glazier | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030207808 | Savitzky et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030215456 | Yao et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220241 | DeFeo-Jones et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030232760 | Garsky et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040001846 | Israeli et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040002478 | Kozikowski et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040018203 | Pastan et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040029778 | Isaacs | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040033195 | Leamon et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040052727 | Dalton et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054190 | Pomper et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040058857 | Yao | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040110723 | Frangioni | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040146516 | Roben et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040213791 | Bander et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040242582 | Green et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050002942 | Vlahov et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050107325 | Manoharan et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119166 | Brady et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050158780 | Lupold et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050234247 | Klar et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050239138 | Hess et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050239739 | Matulic-Adamic | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050245486 | Frangioni | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060024317 | Boyd et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060052312 | Erhardt et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060062793 | Webb et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060105975 | Pendergrast et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106047 | Jiang et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060140871 | Sillerud | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060148718 | Brady et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155021 | Lenges et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155146 | Lenges et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070010014 | Wood et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070020327 | Fikes et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070031326 | Shirvan et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070031438 | Junghans | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070041901 | Diener et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070117153 | Bieniarz et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070128670 | Klatzmann et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070134332 | Turnell et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070142296 | McBride et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070148662 | Israeli et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070160617 | Ma et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070172422 | Glazier | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070179100 | Manoharan | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070219165 | Berkman et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225213 | Kosak | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070244055 | Brady et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070254316 | Rodriguez et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070254317 | Busseret-Michel et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080008719 | Bowdish et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080089869 | Denmeade et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080114153 | Steeves et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080175789 | Frangioni | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080176821 | Kozikowski et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080193381 | Babich et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080214436 | Yu et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080248052 | Vlahov et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269105 | Taft et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080311037 | Heston et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090117042 | Pomper et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090123467 | Bedi et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090180951 | Zimmerman et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090247614 | Manoharan et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090258002 | Barrett et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090274625 | Denmeade et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100048490 | Vlahov et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100092496 | Boyd et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100178246 | Babich et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100183509 | Babich et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100183517 | Berkman | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100209343 | Bander et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100240701 | Vlahov et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110008253 | Babich et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110027180 | Magnani | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110027274 | Cheng et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110064657 | Pomper et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110142760 | Pomper et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110176998 | Pomper et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110200677 | Chandran et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110288152 | Low et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120009121 | Pomper et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120276162 | Zale et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120322741 | Low | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20140107316 | Vlahov et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140140925 | Leamon et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20150110814 | Olson | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20160067341 | Low et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160151508 | Low et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160361376 | Vlahov et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160361432 | Vlahov et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160361433 | Vlahov et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2606138 | Oct 2005 | CA |
0116208 | Aug 1984 | EP |
2002-506204 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2004-536034 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2005-274569 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2006-501149 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2007-521803 | Aug 2007 | JP |
WO 8801622 | Mar 1988 | WO |
WO 9945374 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 2002062398 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 2002098885 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 2003060523 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 2003092742 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 2003097647 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 2004010957 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO 2004069159 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2005082023 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2006012527 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2006093991 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO 2006096754 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO 2006136564 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO 2007022494 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO 2007106869 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO 2008057437 | May 2008 | WO |
WO 2008058192 | May 2008 | WO |
WO 2008121949 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2009026177 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2009082606 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2009002993 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO 2010014933 | Feb 2010 | WO |
WO 2010065902 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO 2011106639 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO 2014078484 | May 2014 | WO |
WO 2014134543 | Sep 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Wang et al., Synthesis, Purification, and Tumor Cell Uptake of 67Ga-Deferoxamine-Folate, a Potential Radiopharmaceutical for Tumor Imaging, Bioconjugate Chemistry (1996), 7(1), 56-62. |
Baur et al., Synthesis and labelling of Df-DUPA-Pep with gallium-68 and zirconium-89 as new PSMA ligandsJournal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry (2014), 299(3), 1715-1721. |
Vosjan et al., nature protocols, vol. 5 No. 4, 2010, pp. 739-743. |
Banerjee, S. et al., “Sequential SPECT and Optical Imaging of Experimental Models of Prostate Cancer with a Dual Modality Inhibitor of the Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2011, 50, 9167-9170. |
Banerjee, S.R. et al. “Synthesis and Evaluation of Technetium-99m- and Rhenium-Labeled Inhibitors of the Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA),” J Med Chem. Aug. 14, 2008; 51(15): 4504-4517. |
Bennett, V.J.,“ Analysis of fluorescently labeled substance P analogs: binding, imaging and receptor activation,” BMC Chemical Biology, 2001, 1:1. doi:10.1186/1472-6769-1-1. |
Chen, Ying, et al., “Radiohalogenated Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA)-Based Ureas as Imaging Agents for Prostate Cancer,” J. Med. Chem., 2008, 51 (24), pp. 7933-7943. |
Cole et al., “Cancer theranostics: the rise of targeted magnetic nanoparticles,” Trends in Biotechnology, 2011, 29, 323-332. |
Davis, Mindy I., et al., “Crystal Structure of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen, A Tumor Marker and Peptidase”, Apr. 26, 2005, PNAS, vol. 102, No. 17, pp. 5981-5986. |
Definition of ligand, Random House Kernerman Webster's College Dictionary, downloaded on Jan. 25, 2014 from http://www.thefreedictionary.com/ligand, 1 page. |
Eder et al., 68Ga-complex lipophilicity and the targeting property of a urea-based PSMA inhibitor for PET imaging, Bioconjugate Chemistry, 2012; 23:688-697. |
Farokhzad, et al., “Nanoparticle-Aptamer Bioconjugates: A New Approach for Targeting Prostate Cancer Cells,” Cancer Research 64, pp. 7668-7672 (2004). |
Foss, Catherine A., et al, “Radiclabeled small-molecule ligands for prostate-specific membrane antigen: in vivo imaging in experimental models of prostate cancer.” Clinical cancer research11.11 (2005): 4022-4028. |
Gomez-Hens et al., “Long wavelength fluorophores: new trends in their analytical use,” Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 2004; 23:127-136. |
Henne, et al., “Synthesis and activity of a folate peptide camptothecin prodrug,” ScienceDirect, Bioorganic & Medical Chemistry Letters 16 (2006) 5350-5355. |
Hillier, Shawn M., et al., “Preclinical Evaluation of Novel Glutamate-Urea-Lysine Analogues That Target Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen as Molecular Imaging Pharmaceuticals for Prostate Cancer,” Cancer Res. Sep. 1, 2009;69(17):6932-40. |
Jackson, Paul F., et al., “Design of NAALADase Inhibitors: A Novel Neuroprotective Strategy”, 2001, Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 8, No. 8, pp. 949-957. |
Jayaprakash, Sarva, et al. “Design and synthesis of a PSMA inhibitor—doxorubicin conjugate for targeted prostate cancer therapy.” ChemMedChem 1.3 (2006): 299-302. |
Kaur, G. et al., “Biological evaluation of tubulysin A: a potential anticancer and antiangiogenic natural product,” Biochem. J., 2006, 396, 235-242. |
Kozikowski, Alan P., et al., “Design of Remarkably Simple, Yet Potent Urea-Based Inhibitors of Glutamate Carbozypeptidase II (NAALADase)”2, 001, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol., 44, No. 3, pp. 298-301. |
Kozikowski, Alan P., et al., “Synthesis of Urea-Based Inhibitors as Active Site Probes of Glutamate Carboxypeptodase II: Efficacy as Analgesic Agents”, 2004, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol., 47, No. 7, pp. 1729-1738. |
Kularatne et al., “Prostate-specific membrane antigen targeted imaging and therapy of prostate cancer using a PSMA inhibitor as a homing ligand,” Molecular Pharmaceutics, 6(3): 780-789 (2009). |
Kularatne, S., “Synthesis and Biological Analysis of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted Anticancer Prodrugs,” J. Med. Chem, 2010, 53(21), 7767-7777. |
Larock, “Comprehensive Organic Transformations, a guide to functional group preparations,” VCH Publishers, Inc. New York (1989). |
Lu, G. et al., “Synthesis and SAR of 99mTc/Re-labeled small molecule prostate specific membrane antigen inhibitors with novel polar chelates,” Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2013, 23, 1557-1563. |
Lupold, et al., “Identification and characterization of nuclease-stabilized RNA molecules that bind human prostate cancer cells via the prostate-specific membrane antigen.” Cancer Res. 2002; 62:4029-4033. |
Majer, Pavel., et al., “Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Thiol-Based Inhibitors of Glutamate Carboxypeptodase II: Discovery of an Orally Active GCP II Inhibitor”, 2003, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol., 46, No. 10, pp. 1989-1996. |
Maresca, K. P., “A Series of Halogenated Heterodimeric Inhibitors of Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) as Radiolabeled Probes for Targeting Prostate Cancer,” J. Med. Chem., 2009, 52 (2), pp. 347-357. |
Maresca, K., et al., “Molecular targeting of prostate cancer with small molecule inhibitors of prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA),” J. Nucl. Med. 2007, 48 (Supplement 2):25P. |
Martin, et al., Helv. Chim. Acta, 78, 486-504 (1995) and Abstract. |
McNamara et al, Cell type specific delivery of siRNAs with aptamer-siRNA chimeras, Nature Biotechnolgy, 2006; 24: 1005-1015. |
Melby, et at., Cancer Research 53(8), pp. 1755-1760 (1993). |
Mesters, et al., et al., “Structure of Glutamate Carboxypeptidase II, a Drug Target in Neuronal Damage and Prostate Cancer”2, 006, The EMBO Journal, vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 1375-1384. |
Olsnes, S., et al., Immunology Today, 10, pp. 291-295 (1989). |
Paranjpe, et al., “Tumor-targeted bioconjugate based delivery of camptothecin: design, synthesis and in vitro evaluation,” ScienceDirect Journal of Controlled Release 100 (2004) 275-292. |
Pathalk et al., Enzymic protecting group techniques in organic synthesis, Stereosel. Biocatal. 775-797 (2000). |
Peltier et al., “The Total Synthesis of Tubulysin D,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128:16018-19 (2006). |
Pubchem, Compound summary for: CID 58099954, Aug. 19, 2012. |
Radioisotopes in Medicine, from http://www.word-nuclear.org/information-library/non-power-nuclear applications/radioisotopes-research/radioisotopes-in-medicine.aspx, Dec. 28, 2016, pp. 1-20. |
Ranasinghe, M. G., et al., “Facile Synthesis of Unsymmetrical Thiolsulfonates via Sulfonylation of Mercaptans”, 1988, Synthetic Communications, vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 227-232. |
Reddy et al., “PSMA-specific anti-tumor activity of the targeted-tubulysin conjugate, EC1169,” American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting(Apr. 8, 2013) Poster. |
Reddy et al., “PSMA-specific anti-tumor activity of the targeted-tubulysin conjugate, EC1169,” American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting(Apr. 8, 2013) Presentation Abstract. |
Roy, et al., “DUPA Conjugation of a Cytotoxic Indenoisoquinoline Topoisomerase I Inhibitor for Selective Prostate Cancer Cell Targeting,” J. Med. Chem. 58 (2015) 3094-3103. |
Theodora E. Greene & Peter G.M. Wuts, “Protective Groups ion Organic Synthesis,” 2d edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York (1991). |
Truffert, et al., Tetrahedron, 52:3005 (1996). |
Vlahov, et al., “Design and regioselective synthesis of a new generation of targeted chemotherapeutics. Part 1: EC145, a folic acid conjugate of desacetylvinblastine monohydrazide,” ScienceDirect, Bioorganic & Medical Chemistry Letters 16 (2006) 5093-5096. |
Wang et al., “Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Targeted Tubulysin Conjugates for Cancer Therapy,” 246th ACS National Meeting and Exposition(Sep. 8, 2013) Poster. |
Yang, et al., “Characterization of the pH of Folate Receptor-Containing Endosomes and the Rate of Hydrolysis of Internalized Acid-Labile Folate-Drug Conjugates,” JPET 321: 462-468, 2007. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160193371 A1 | Jul 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62100677 | Jan 2015 | US |