This application is a national stage application under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of PCT/US2013/072683, filed Dec. 2, 2013.
In the computer interface technology space, M.2 (formerly known as the Next Generation Form Factor (NGFF)) is a transition from the mini-SATA (mSATA) and the PCI Express Mini Card (Mini PCIe) form factors to a more advanced farm factor bath in terms of physical size and available features. The interface technology supports various modules including, but not limited to WiFi, Bluetooth, Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), Near Field Communication (NFC), Wireless Gigibit Alliance (WiGig). Wireless Wide Area Network (WWAN), and Solid State Devices (SSD) modules. In addition, PCI Express (PCIe), Serial ATA (SATA), and Universal Serial Bus (USB) 3.0 may be routed to the M.2 interface, thereby enabling M.2 to provide more flexibility and functionality than prior solutions. This is beneficial as the computing industry continues to trend toward lighter and thinner platforms.
Examples are described in the following detailed description and in reference to the drawings, in which:
Certain terms are used throughout the following description and claims to refer to particular system components. As one skilled in the art will appreciate, computer companies may refer to components by different names. This document does not intend to distinguish between components that differ in name but not function. In the following discussion and in the claims, the terms “including” and “comprising” are used in an open-ended fashion, and thus should be interpreted to mean “including, but not limited to . . . ” Also, the term “couple” or “couples” is intended to mean either an indirect or direct connection. Thus, if a first device couples to a second device, that connection may be through a direct electrical or mechanical connection, through an indirect electrical or mechanical connection via other devices and connections, through an optical electrical connection, or through a wireless electrical connection. As used herein the term “approximately” means plus or minus 10%. In addition, the terms “M.2” and “NGFF” may be used interchangeably throughout the present disclosure and should be understood to referring to the same computing interface. Furthermore, the term “vertical” is intended to mean upright and approximately perpendicular to the plane of the horizon. The term “horizontal” is intended to mean approximately parallel to the plane of the horizon. The term “front surface” of the module is intended to refer to the primary face of the module where the majority of components are placed. The term “rear surface” is intended to refer to the face opposite the front surface that may or may not include components thereon. The term “upright orientation” is intended to mean that the module is positioned vertically with a side/edge surface facing a printed circuit board (PCB), and thus neither the front surface nor rear surface substantially faces the PCB.
The following discussion is directed to various examples of the disclosure. Although one or more of these examples may be preferred, the examples disclosed should not be interpreted, or otherwise used, as limiting the scope of the disclosure, including the claims. In addition, one skilled in the art will understand that the following description has broad application, and the discussion of any example is meant only to be descriptive of that example, and not intended to intimate that the scope of the disclosure, including the claims, is limited to that example.
As described above. M.2 is a new interface technology that is ideal for various applications. Among other benefits, the interface technology is more flexible and physically smaller than earlier interface technologies. This flexibility is beneficial because it enables complex management of PCIe. SATA, and/or USS devices. The physical size is a benefit because computing devices such as desktops are trending towards thinner, lighter, and smaller form factors (e.g., mini desktops and all-in-one (AiOs) desktops), and therefore space on the printed circuit board (PCB) and/or within the chassis is at a premium.
While various M.2 benefits are currently being realized, additional benefits may be realized by utilizing the novel and previously unforeseen implementation architecture described throughout the present disclosure. In particular, in current systems utilizing an M.2 interface, an M.2 connector component is placed on the motherboard PCB to receive the M.2 module in a flat manner such that either the front surface or rear surface of the M.2 module faces the PCB. That is, the M.2 module and the PCB are arranged in two parallel planes. In order to retain the M.2 module in this fiat position, an attachment screw is inserted at the non-connector end of the M.2 module to hold the M.2 module down to the PCB. Hence, the M.2 module lays fiat on the PCB, and on one end, couples to a connector component arranged to receive the M.2 module in the flat orientation, and on the other end, an attachment screw is inserted into a cutout on the M.2 module to hold the module down on the PCB.
While the above-described installation approach is appropriate for many applications, in some applications, this approach may not be optimal. In particular, because M.2 modules generally have rectangular dimensions of 22 mm×30 mm, 22 mm×42 mm, 22 mm×60 mm, 22 mm×80 mm, and 22 mm×110 mm, orienting the M.2 module flat on the system board takes significant. PCB real-estate that could be used for other system components and/or other M.2 modules. Moreover, because the M.2 module length can vary from 30 mm to 110 mm, and because attachment screws are utilized at one end, the system board designer needs to design the PCB with one M.2 module length in mind. As a result, it is difficult or even impossible to utilize an M.2 module with a different length after the PCB design is finalized without altering the system board's signal and/or power plane routing and component placement.
Aspects of the present disclosure attempt to address at least the above-mentioned issues by providing a universal M.2 connector solution that potentially decreases the connector/moduie PCB footprint, accommodates different length M.2 modules without requiring PCB redesign, accommodates multiple M.2 modules in a space typically taken by one M.2 module, reduces component count by eliminating attachment screws, and/or reduces manufacturing costs by eliminating attachment screws.
The universal M.2 connector solution utilizes a connector component to receive the M.2 module in an upright orientation such that neither the front surface nor the rear surface of the M.2 module substantially faces the PCB. In addition, the connector component includes an integrated retention mechanism to retain the M.2 module in the upright orientation without a retention mechanism external to the connector (e.g., without an attachment screw on one end of the M.2 module).
In one example in accordance with the present disclosure, a computing system is provided. The computing system may be, for example, a desktop, workstation, laptop, scientific instrument, gaming device, tablet, AiO desktop, television, hybrid laptop, detachable tablet/laptop, server, retail point of sale, or a similar computing system. The computing system comprises a PCB, a connector component coupled to the PCB, and a M.2 module coupled to the connector component The M.2 module is coupled to the connector component in an upright orientation such that neither a front surface nor a rear surface of the M.2 module substantially faces the printed circuit board, and the M.2 module is coupled to the connector component in the upright orientation without a retention mechanism external to the connector component. The connector component may receive and retain any size M.2 module length (e.g., 22 mm×30 mm, 22 mm×42 mm, 22 mm×60 mm, 22 mm×80 mm, and 22 mm×110 mm). Further, the connector component, depending on implementation, may receive the M.2 module in either a “vertical sideways” (see, e.g.,
In one example implementation, the connector component receives and retains the M.2 module in the upright orientation based on only a friction force between the connector component and the M.2 module. In another example implementation, the connector component receives and retains the M.2 module in the upright orientation based at least in part on a pair of clamps integrated with the connector component. In yet another example implementation, the connector component receives and retains the M.2 module in the upright orientation based at least in part on a locking mechanism integrated into the connector component.
Furthermore, in some examples, traces internal to the connector component connecting a first connector portion to a second connector portion are length matched to provide optimum timing margins and/or to prevent electromagnetic interference (EMI). These and other example implementations are discussed further below with reference to various examples and figures.
Within the connector component 110, traces may be length matched to provide optimum timing margins and/or to prevent electromagnetic interference (EMI). This length matching may be achieved, for example, by including a PCB within the connector 110 and routing the traces such that the length of each trace from one side of the connector to the other side of the connector is the same. In another implementation. a PCB is not used internal to the connector component 110, and instead the wires or other mediums used to transfer the signals from one side of the connector to the other side of the connector are the same length.
As mentioned, the component connector 110 is to retain the M.2 module without attachment screws. This may be accomplished via a friction force, a pair of integrated clamps, an internal locking mechanism, and/or another integrated retention mechanism. With regard to the friction force implementation, an example uses interference fit technology also known as press fit of friction fit technology) to fasten the internal connector contacts to the M.2 module. That is, a frictional force between the contacts and M.2 module fastens the two together without the need for additional fasteners. With regard to the pair of integrated damps implementation, a damp may be located on each side of the connector 110, and these clamps may disengage from the M.2 module when pressed, and engage the side of the M.2 module when released. With regard to the internal locking mechanism implementation, an example uses clips/clamps internal to the connector 110 to engage upon insertion of the M.2 module 102, and disengage if the M.2 module 102 is pulled with a force beyond a threshold and/or disengage if a release button/tab on the connector 110 is depressed. In another example, the connector 110 may utilize a zero insertion force (ZIF) arrangement where a lever or, slider on the connector may be moved in one direction to engage the connector contacts with the M.2 module 102, and moved in the other direction to disengage the connector contacts from the M.2 module 102.
Turning, now to
It should be understood that while
Looking now at
Turning to
Looking now at
Looking now at
As mentioned above, while
Turning now to
While the above disclosure has been shown and described with reference to the foregoing examples, it should be understood that other forms, details, and implementations may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure that is defined in the following claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2013/072683 | 12/2/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/084316 | 6/11/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
8559189 | Li | Oct 2013 | B2 |
20080121706 | Defibaugh | May 2008 | A1 |
20090231798 | Skinner | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20130164951 | Ma et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130252449 | Tang et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130294023 | Gay | Nov 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202917665 | May 2013 | CN |
2000-299152 | Oct 2000 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Addonics Technologies. Embedded IDE-CF Adapter. 1998-2013 Addonics Technologies, Inc., 2 pages. |
Heilind Stocking JAE's New M.2 (NGFF) Card Edge Connector : N/A Aug. 22, 2013; http://www.ebnonline.com/document.asp?doc_id=267040. |
M.2 (next Generation Form Factor); TE Connectivity Ltd.; May 10, 2013; https://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CC0QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2. |
News Posts matching “NGFF”; Aug. 22, 2013; http://www.ebnonline.com/document.asp?doc_id=267040. |
NGFF Spec Promises Smaller SSDs; Gasior, G.; Techreport Com.; Sep. 14, 2012; http://techreport.com/news/23570/ngff-spec-promises-smaller-ssds. |
SATA M.2 Card; 2013; https://www.sata-io.org/sata-m2-card. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170005422 A1 | Jan 2017 | US |