This disclosure relates to rebounding apparatus that is of any size. The described apparatus may also be fabricated with diverse and assorted materials, such as plastics of various types, fiberglass, Kevlar or other aramid fibers may be used, or other composites of a suitable material, or some combination of any of these materials capable of providing sufficient structural support for a trampoline and its typical usage and to support the stresses placed upon it. The adult and adult sized users of such devices are individual persons generally over 16 years old, and between a height of 4 feet 7 inches and 6 feet 7 inches, with a weight range between 70 lbs. to 400 lbs. Children between the ages of 4 to 8 may also use these trampolines for fitness and fun, but their bodyweight is generally lighter, between 30 to 80 lbs. Young people between the ages of 8 and 16 can vary greatly in weight and size, from 50 lbs. to in excess of 300 lbs. The disclosed device is configurable to support each of individuals in these weight ranges and within these age groups.
Smaller rebounders such as fitness rebounders and trampolines, have a bed that is made of flexible fabric attached to an encompassing or closed frame by spring elements or by one or more cordlike flexible elastic members (cords, bungees, or the like). A plurality of legs supports the frame at a distance above the ground. The height of the rebounding surface above the ground surface can range from a few inches to approximately 18 inches. The height may be greater, but generally not higher than 24 inches above the ground surface for a fitness sized trampoline encompassing an area of approximately 2,000 square inches or less. Any higher than 24 inches, and safety concerns are raised as a user would be higher off the ground surface on a smaller platform (jump surface) that is unstable. Hence, a device higher than 24 inches above the ground surface generally needs to be of a greater diameter than what's been described, and tends towards being more properly defined as a large trampoline or full size trampoline, and not a fitness rebounder or mini trampoline. The height off the ground surface for larger trampoline may be 36 inches or greater in limited situations. The disclosed device and its utility in not limited in anyway by the height of the trampoline surface to which it is attached or coupled. Additionally, it should be noted that the disclosed devices are not limited to mini-trampolines under 2000 square inches as the disclosed device may also be adapted to larger, full sized trampolines with a diameter extending to 20 feet.
The spring members or elements may be of any kind of rope or cord which has elastic qualities which permits the spring member to stretch when extended or compress when extension is reversed or shortened. The spring members may be any type of elastic cords or may be made of a natural or synthetic rubber or other man made elastic material, or include the type of cords known as bungee or shock cords composed of one or more elastic strands forming a core and commonly covered in a sheath of woven material such as cotton, polypropylene, polyester or other suitable material. Also, the spring member may include any other types of metal or composite springs or other type of cords that may function with the indicated embodiments or that may be configured for use with a rebounder described herein.
In a typical prior art trampoline and rebounder configuration, the mat is tensioned by such previously described elastic or spring elements generally arranged radially between the mat outer diameter and the inner diameter of the frame. This area is sometimes covered by a static pad which is attached to the frame, and prevents the user from stepping directly onto the elastic elements or springs. The disclosed devices allow for the spring members to have the tension adjusted according to a user's weight or athletic ability but in a connector with a smaller size and lower profile; and without the need to replace the spring member. It is an object of the disclosed device to reduce the stress and friction placed on the coupled spring members in order to increase they useful life by reorienting the cord coupling path and direction in a new and innovative way. In the past, the only way tension has been changed or adjusted for mini-trampoline spring members, especially elastic cords, has been to remove an existing cord, and then replace it with an entirely different elastic cord member of a different tension; generally achieved by the replacing cord being of a lesser or greater diameter. These requirements and limitations are substantially reduced with the current disclosed devices because the same cord is used to change the tension for multiple users. With the current device, the user may adjust the existing cord to alter tension, resulting in a significant gain in utility, as well as reduction in costs and expenses. Additionally, users of different weights and abilities may use the same trampoline and cord members even though they vary greatly in body weight, or athletic ability.
Disclosed herein are trampoline-type devices that comprise an encompassing frame supported by plural legs that contains adjustable bungee (or elastic member, or elastic spring or cord member), connectors and extenders.
Disclosed is an improved connector that angles cord attachment locations (or channels) to successfully minimize cord wear and helps to retain the seated or attached cord in order to reduce the chance of detachment of the cord from the connector when under rebounding stress. The result is longer cord life and better cord retention in the connector.
The angles are defined as Gamma and/or Beta. The angle β (Beta) angle is defined as the angle formed between the top and bottom portions of the elastic spring member (cord, or bungee) when they are installed on a trampoline at rest. The angle Γ (Gamma) is defined as the angle formed between the upper connector spring member receiving channel and the lower spring member receiving channel, which is substantially the same as the Beta angle as it extends towards the enclosing frame. The relative angles will vary depending on the distance of the connector to the frame, and depending on the diameter or thickness of the frame rail. The result is a trampoline elastic cord connector that has the upper and lower receiving portions angled apart to substantially follow or match the angle of Γ at the connector and the angle β of an elastic cord when it is installed on the trampoline. This matching angle results in a smooth connection to the cord along the path of the connector cord receiving channels (angle Γ) which greatly reducing the stress placed upon the cord member as it extends from the connector toward the frame (angle β).
Also disclosed is a cord and elastic spring member connector which permits an increase in the usable surface area of the rebounding mat without a corresponding loss or reduction of elastic spring member length.
Also disclosed is a connector that achieves a lower vertical profile which in turn, reduces the chance that the connector will interfere with a user jumping on the device by reducing the chance of a user's footfall impediment by said connector. This is achieved in part by removing the need for material separation of the cord portions from each other at the connector. This is not a usual solution. Generally, it is the goal to eliminate contact of any kind between portions of the elastic cord segments. The motive to remove or minimize friction inevitably points in the direction of solutions that naturally keep such cord portions separate from each other. Keeping cord segments from contacting each other reduces the chance of unwanted friction, and the resultant wear and tear that can occur to the elastic cord segments. In direct contrast, the instant connector design actually permits cord segments to be in contact with each other.
The challenge with lowering the top portion of the connector is that one must then raise the lower receiving channel at the same time. If one were to lower only the top relative to the mat strap bar and leave the lower receiving portion in the same place, it results in a twisting moment or torque which rotates the connector upward. Even though it appears to successfully appear to have a lower profile when viewed from the side and at rest, the connector rotates when installed such that it will protrude up even higher than before. This effect can be even more pronounced when the rebounder is being engaged by a user.
Another improvement for balancing the connector in the way shown is it does not matter where the terminal ends of the cord member portions are located; it only matters which direction the cord member portions extend away from the connector. This is what led the inventor and engineers to develop these designs where, when knots are used in some embodiments, the knots can mount low and out of the way, and then the cord member is routed up a guide hump; and then allowed to extend out to the frame. The closer the top elastic member loop is to the bottom legs, the lower the profile can be. It should be apparent that the upper channel and lower channel may each receive a portion of the elastic member along a curved surface facing the interior of the jumping mat; or they may differ in that one portion possesses a curved receiving portion and the opposing receiving portion is comprised of two bores or openings capable of receiving terminal cord ends, when the elastic member comprises a cord segment with two terminal ends. In some cases, the ends may have a knot or a bulbous protrusion preventing the cord end from slipping out of the holes when the cord is installed on the connector. In each case the opposing channels (or holes) are angled in the manner described in this specification.
Also disclosed is another innovative design improvement that practically eliminates the material separating the top and bottom loop on several of the designs. Since it was learned that the closer one can get the top and bottom, the lower profile would result, such that the new design eliminated any separation. This was not a logical direction to go from a design perspective because one would think that having the cords in regular frictional contact would result in a shortened cord life. It turns out that when the cords touch near the top loop, there is little damaging motion at that part of the cord, so the durability of the cord remained good due to the general lack of relative motion, or a “sawing back and forth” effect, at the frictional contact location. In fact, some connectors tested such as that shown at 301 and 401, had a longer cord life than even the company's current connector, because other improvements were added that helped the cord life more than the frictional contact of the cords decreased life. These added improvements made were in aligning the cord guides on the connectors where the cord was actually going to go or directionally extend. With current connectors, the connector's cord receiving portions point straight ahead and are parallel with each other. In reality, the top of the elastic cord angles up to go over the frame and the bottom of the elastic cord angles down to go under the frame. By providing smooth surfaces leading to these angles instead of square corners, elastic cord life was increased.
Because of elastic cords complete flexibility and ability to extend and stretch, it has never been previously considered that altering connector angles would provide any sort of improvement to cord longevity and function, and so the improvements with this solution are significant, in that the new connector allows for both a reduced vertical profile and a slightly larger jump surface, without loss in spring performance because the original spring length does not need to be altered; i.e. made shorter which would adversely affect bounce performance. And, because the cord segments are permitted to touch each other, less material of the connector is required to be disposed between them. Traditionally, to separate cord segments, one must physically do so by thickening the amount of material between them in order to create the space required to keep them separate; especially during jumping or use while the spring members are being extended downward. Intentionally permitting cord contact at the described points is unique in that the goal has always been to reduce or remove frictional contact at any point for cord segments in relation to each other. All connector prior to the disclosed device possessed receiving channels that were parallel to each other and did not diverge at an angle relative to each other. This results in a bend or pinch at the location where the spring member leaves the channel. The cords go from substantially parallel to each other, to an angle relative to each other in order to wrap around the frame rail of a rebounder. Thus the cord segments are frictionally pinched and bent the moment they extend from the connector. The disclosed device reduces such frictional contact such that cord life has been found to increase approximately 28%; a significant improvement over prior art.
The result of these various improvement is to create a lightweight connector with less overall structural material that has traditionally been needed to separate cord members that are situated substantially above and below each other when disposed on the trampoline frame and mat. Most of the removed material is what is commonly filled in between these upper and lower cord segments. As a result, the instant connector is less thick in height, taking up less vertical space and so produces a lower profile connection between the spring members and the mat jump surface. Finally, the structural material of the connector can be entirely removed (
In the present invention, the first object is achieved by providing a rebounding surface comprising a closed frame that is horizontally disposed, a rebounding mat having at least a central portion thereof elastically suspended within said closed frame, at least one cordlike flexible elastic member, a plurality of connectors attached to the perimeter of the central portion of the rebounding mat, connector member connecting a cordlike flexible elastic member to the rebounding mat, wherein at least one of the connectors has an upper cordlike flexible elastic member (cord, bungee, spring member) receiving channel and a lower cordlike flexible elastic member receiving channel, and where the Gamma, angle between the upper receiving channel and the lower receiving channel is greater than 0 degrees. The angle gamma has also optimally been found between 5 and 25 degrees. It has also been determined that the disclosed device of
Also disclosed is the same Gamma and Beta angles applied to a connector able to receive an elastic cord member having a first end and an opposing end for coupling the central portion of said rebounding mat in elastic suspension to said frame, a plurality of the disclosed connectors attached to the perimeter of the central portion of said rebounding mat, each connector connecting a cordlike flexible elastic member to the rebounding mat, wherein at least one of the frame, and at least one cordlike elastic member and a connector of said plurality are adapted to dispose at least one of the first end and opposing end of the at least one cordlike elastic member at least two alternative positions to provide at least two alternative levels of tension to the rebounding mat.
Another way of describing the adjustability of the spring members is that at least one of the connectors couples a cordlike elastic member in a manner such that the tension of the “tensioned portion” of the elastic member can be adjusted by moving a portion of the body of the member relative to the connector. The “tensioned portion” is defined as that portion of the elastic member that extends between the two most distant places where the cord is connected where the tensioned part of the cord member terminates. It can be possible for parts of the cord to extend beyond the tensioned part.
As one example, if an elastic member or bungee were to be knotted, the excess material would be part of the cord, but not part of the tensioned portion of the cord. This is shown in
An additional aspect of the invention is characterized in that the described connector, clip, or coupler (interchangeable descriptors) is comprised of no less than three connection location points or positions for retaining an elastic cord member that is capable of multiple tension adjustment positions. One attachment (or mated engagement) position occurs where one segment or length of the cord is directly adjacent and seated such that it fastens or holds along a curve segment of the connector whose angle_is always greater than 180 degrees; preferably at or greater than 200 degrees. Note that “mated engagement” can also refer to a cord segment or bulbous portion being attached or inserted in or to an aperture at a 90-degree angle in the aperture. However, this angle can be greater than 90 degrees. It has been found that 200 degrees optimally minimizes unwanted cord friction along the curved attachment position where the angle α is always greater than 180 degrees for the curvilinear surface shown on the connector. This cord loop attachment position or retaining feature holds a central segment of the elastic cord at some location between two additional attachment positions. The second and third attachment positions consist of apertures, apertures or sockets (which are interchangeable terms) that retain the two ends of the elastic cord. Sometimes additional material of the elastic spring member may be present at a distance further from an attachment aperture than the bulbous protrusion secured at an aperture location on a connector, or elsewhere. For example, the cord may be knotted such that the terminal end of the cord is not part of the knot, but rather constitutes nonfunctioning excess material. This is defined as the tensioned portion of the cord segment, which is next to 1D, 106 and 108. The attachable ends of the bungee or elastic cords are of a larger diameter than the apertures or sockets such that they will not slip back through the apertures. These attachable ends may be configured to do this any number of ways; however, one preferred method is to knot the cord at or near the end, and at one or more additional locations along the length of the elastic cord so that multiple tension adjustments may be achieved. The remainder of the same cord encircles the frame rail opposite the connector and then returns to be connected at a third tensioned position, which is that portion of the elastic member that is furthest from where the first tensioned coupling occurs. So the elastic cord extends between the two most distant tensioned locations where the cord is connected. Other ways of ensuring that the coupled or connected ends of the cords are larger than the diameter of the cords themselves may be conceived, some of which are disclosed herein. Knots are a preferred method due to the simplicity and ease of adjustability. Of no less importance is the advantage of knots taking up very little space when compared to other attachments that serve to enlarge the end of a cord member.
Another aspect of the invention is characterized in that the rebounding surface further comprises a plurality of cord like elastic members, wherein at least some of said plurality of cord like elastic member are folded at the center thereof, with the folded center thereof wrapped around the connector and each of the two portion thereof between the center and the first and opposing end returning to wraparound an adjacent portion of the frame such that the first and opposing ends are tensioned on return to connect at the periphery of the rebounding mat to provide tension thereto.
The above and other objects, effects, features, and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following description of the embodiments thereof taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The bottom portion of the elastic cord terminates with knots on the ends, which then hook or attach into the bottom or lower portion of the connector; and then the cord is stretched under the frame rail. The new connectors angled top and bottom portions align with the direction that the elastic cord must travel to wrap around the frame rail. The top portion of the connector is angled up and the bottom portion is angled down. The top portion of the elastic cord goes up over the frame, and the bottom portion goes down under the frame, so they end up being bent with a sharp corner as they leave the parallel connector. The new angled connector slots and holes are aligned with the path of the elastic member. This means the cord is not bent as it goes up and over the frame, or down and under the frame.
The reason for the increased life of the elastic cord when connected to this new design is that the elastic cord member does not bend and contort when coupled in the manner of prior connectors. Old style connectors disposed the slots such that they were lined up parallel to each other; but, the elastic cord did not exit the connector in a parallel direction. All other current and prior elastic cord connectors function in this manner. The top portion of the cord connects to the top of the connector and then is stretched over the trampoline frame rail. The non-parallel extension of the cord members causes increased pressure, friction, and wear along the cord, shortening the cords safe or usable lifespan.
The bottom portion of the elastic cord terminates with knots (or other bulbous or enlarged portions) on the ends, which then hook or attach into the bottom or lower portion of the connector; and then the cord is stretched under the frame rail. The new connectors angled top and bottom portions better align with the direction that the elastic cord must travel to wrap around the frame rail. The top portion of the connector is angled up and the bottom portion is angled down. The top portion of the elastic cord goes up over the frame, and the bottom portion goes down under the frame, so they end up being bent with a sharp corner as they leave the parallel connector. The new angled connector slots and holes are aligned in parallel along the path of the elastic member. This means the cord is not bent nearly as much, if at all, as it goes up and over the frame, or down and under the frame.
The result is a trampoline with a frame has a rebounding mat that is tensioned to the frame with a plurality of flexible and cordlike linear elastic members. Preferably each cordlike elastic member is connected to the frame with at least one connector retaining the cord such that the cord is disposed at an angle between 0 degrees and 25 degrees. Also shown are connectors with the described angles, and where the ends of the cords are retained with internally or externally oriented knot retention openings. The optimal angle depends on the geometry of the rebounder specifically the diameter of the frame rail and the distance between the connectors and the frame rail. The angles are described as the Gamma angle of the connector and the Beta angle of the extending cord portions. If the frame rail diameter is large, and the cord is close to the frame, the angle between the top and bottom portions of the elastic cord extending around the frame will be larger. If the frame rail diameter is small and the cord is farther from the frame, the angle between the top and bottom portions of the elastic cord will be smaller. For the more common rebounder the designs and sizes (generally less that 50 inches of jump surface, the optimal angle between the top and bottom connection points on the connector is are more optimally between 10 and 15 degrees. The alternative positions permit a tensioning process that extends the lifetime of elastic cords having a fabric sheath. The cord members are permitted to contact and also compress against each other at rest and during use.
Cord and Knot Tests
This table compares the results of tests done on the previous connector with parallel connection points compared to the new improved connector design with the top and bottom connection points angled apart from each other. This shows that the average life for elastic cords on the original connector when cycled with a 4-inch stroke is 1,227,000 cycles. The average life for bungees tested with the angled connector is 1,580,000 cycles which is a 28% improvement over the prior design.
Test Set-Up
Put bungee on test machine at specified knot setting
Ran machine for a number of cycles at 60 rpm
Stroke set to pull installed bungee 4 inches
Load cell measured average maximum force and average minimum force
Common Elastic Member or Cords
Below is a table of common bungee or elastic cord specifications used in testing, and a description of selection criteria: The knot lengths were set to achieve target tension in the elastic cord tension range when stretched 3 inches. Elastic cords were then installed on a test machine with the same initial stretch as the actual rebounding apparatus. The machine stretched the cords at a fixed stroke. The range of stretch strokes we tested was between 3-7 inches. The bungee tension would degrade over time, and once the minimum force dropped below 15 pounds, the cord was tightened to the next knot. This procedure continued until there were no more knots. The number of cycles required to complete the test were compared among the various cords, and the cord that lasted the longest was selected. Other causes of failure included too much abrasion and wear on the frame tube, a decrease in aesthetic appearance of the bungee cord, and a maximum force that exceeded the stretched bungee tension range.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/397,726, filed Apr. 29, 2019, which is a continuation of International Application No. PCT/US2017/059412, filed Oct. 31, 2017, which was published in English under PCT Article 21(2), which in turn claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/415,451, filed Oct. 31, 2016. The provisional application is incorporated herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
8038580 | Pieper Genannt Schmauck | Oct 2011 | B2 |
9289637 | Publicover | Mar 2016 | B2 |
10307628 | Tseng | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10532238 | Publicover | Jan 2020 | B2 |
20130316876 | Publicover et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20160096056 | de Boer | Apr 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202007019487 | Nov 2012 | DE |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Feb. 27, 2018, from PCT Application No. PCT/US2017/059412, 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200023224 A1 | Jan 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62415451 | Oct 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16397726 | Apr 2019 | US |
Child | 16508243 | US | |
Parent | PCT/US2017/059412 | Oct 2017 | US |
Child | 16397726 | US |