The present specification generally relates to female DIN receptacles, and particularly to a resilient circular female DIN receptacle configured to maintain mating retention and withstand a high number of mating cycles.
Electrophysiological methods, such as electroencephalography (EEG), electromyography (EMG), and evoked potentials, measure the functional integrity of certain neural structures (e.g., nerves, spinal cord and parts of the brain). Neurodiagnostics is the use of electrophysiological methods, such as electroencephalography (EEG), electromyography (EMG), and evoked potentials (EP), to diagnose the functional integrity of certain neural structures (e.g., nerves, spinal cord and parts of the brain) to assess disease states and determine potential therapy or treatment. With EMG and EPs, a neurologist typically utilizes electrodes applied to the patient near the nerves being assessed. These electrodes used are in many forms including needles, metal disks, and conductive pads. Each of these electrodes is coupled to a wire lead which, in turn, is connected to an amplifier for amplification of the EMG or EP electrical signals. The wire leads are usually coupled with standard connectors comprising a male plug which fits into a corresponding female receptacle for connecting with the control unit of monitoring equipment, such as, for example, EMG monitoring equipment. The electrical activity pattern captured by various electrodes is analyzed using standard algorithms to localize or spot the portion of brain which is responsible for causing the specific ailment.
During a typical EMG and EP study, the electrodes are connected and disconnected many times, thus requiring a connector that can withstand many mating cycles. After many mating cycles, the connector must maintain reliable electrical connectivity and mating force. An appropriate mating force is necessary since a low mating force may result in the connector being pulled out of the amplifier during the EMG or EP study.
The standard Deutsches Institut für Normung (DIN) connector, for example, a 45322 DIN connector (5 position circular), is a default standard connector used in EMG equipment. Both recording and stimulating electrodes may terminate with male DIN connector plugs. During the course of a patient examination, the connector may be mated/unmated multiple times. The number of mating cycles on a daily basis may exceed 20 depending on the application. Commercially available circular female DIN connector receptacles are typically rated for 1000 mating cycles.
Current methods of securing a DIN connector are not suitable for use with an EMG or EP instrument. These methods include spring fingers and some sort of latching mechanism. Spring fingers have limited mating cycles below what is required for EMG/EP instruments. Latching mechanisms for DIN connectors are not desirable for the following reasons: requires a non-standard DIN plug that would limit the possibility of available electrodes, add cost to the electrode, and require more effort, such as twisting or pressing, to remove the DIN plug from the amplifier.
The retention force of commercially available DIN receptacles relies on the friction between the DIN plug prong and the DIN receptacle pin socket. One type of pin socket is tulip shaped. The poor retention force is due to an elasticity and/or mechanical breakdown of the tulip shaped contacts 106 in the female DIN receptacle 104. The tulip shaped contacts 106 are subject to distortion after repeated mating cycles. Thus, for a female DIN receptacle that is rated for 1000 cycles, the receptacle starts losing its electric contact and retention force after 50 days of use in EMG equipment. Another type of pin socket is a circular contact. Certain variations of the circular contact have superior electrical contact with high mating cycles. However, the retention force of the circular contact is low. Low retention force of the female DIN receptacle is problematic since the electrode may disconnect from the EMG equipment as the electrode is moved about the patient during the examination.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,284,313, assigned to ITT Corporation, discloses a detachable electrical connector in which “a resilient hood on the receptacle connector member surrounds the forward portion of the plug connector member. Lugs on the plug connector member snap into recesses in the hood to latch the connector members together. The hood is connected to the body of the receptacle member by longitudinally extending ribs. In one embodiment of the invention, the hood is circular and is rotated to ride up over the latching lugs to release the lugs from the recesses, thereby allowing the connector members to be disengaged.”
U.S. Pat. No. 4,842,555, assigned to AMP Incorporated, discloses a surface mounted electrical connector which “has a metal shield (12) having a front plate (28) with a circular opening (30) for receiving a shielded socket (18) of a mating connector (20), to allow it to mate with a plug portion (16) of the surface mounted connector (10). Spring fingers (34) project from the edge (32) of the opening (30) for engaging shielding (19) of the mating connector (20). Between a pair of the fingers (34) there also projects form the edge (32), a latching finger (80) which is shorter than the spring fingers (34), for latching behind a depressable protuberance (90) on the socket (18). When the plug portion (16) is to be mated with the socket (18), a flexible arm (98) in the socket (18), which carries the protuberance (90) is supported by a support bar (88) which is stiffly resilient. During mating, the protuberance (90) displaces the latching finger (80) and latches behind its free end (84). A sleeve (100) on the mating connector (20) can be pulled to withdraw the support bar (98) so that the protuberance can slide under the latching finger (80) to allow the connectors (10 and 20) to be unmated.”
U.S. Pat. No. 5,035,650, assigned to AMP Incorporated, discloses “a dielectric housing (4) of a circular, shielded DIN electrical connector (2) [which] comprises a central block (26) with terminal receiving cavities (18) extending axially therethrough and which cooperates with a hood (30) and a base (28) of the housing (4) to define a circular chamber receiving a circular, stamped and formed metal shield (8). The shield (8) has projecting therefrom a uniplanar latch arm (80) having a head (81) which latches positively against a latching shoulder (88) in a slot in the base. The latch arm (80) is deflected in its own plane by a cam surface in the slot as the latch arm (80) is inserted thereinto and then resiles to allow the head (81) to latch against the shoulder (88).”
U.S. Pat. No. 5,871,371, assigned to The Whitaker Corporation, discloses “an electrical connector for providing connection for a plurality of coaxial cable disposed in a shielded cable. The connector includes a contact housing having a plurality of signal and ground contacts mounted therein. The contact housing has an outer periphery. The signal and ground contacts are disposed about the outer periphery of the contact housing. The signal and ground contacts each have contact sections and connection sections for forming an electrical connection with the signal and ground from a coaxial cable.”
U.S. Pat. No. 6,183,293, assigned to ITT Manufacturing, Inc., discloses an “electrical connector for mounting in an opening (2) of a wall (3), [which] includes a connector element (4) having a bayonet threaded shaft (7) that projects into the opening and a clamp element (5) with a nut part that can be threaded onto the threaded shaft until shoulders on the two elements abut the wall, where the connector includes a latching mechanism (40) that prevents loosening of the clamp member. The latching mechanism includes a holder ring (54) on the connector element, that lies within a latch ring (50) on the clamp element. The latch ring has inwardly-extending projections (42, 44), while the holder ring carries at least one latch member (14). When the clamping member is tightened on the connector element, the distal end (15a) of the latch member readily rides over the projections. However, when the clamping member begins to loosen, the distal end resists such loosening.”
U.S. Pat. No. 9,088,103, assigned to Omnetics Connector Corporation, discloses an “apparatus and system for securing a mated connector pair with a latch. The latch is a unitary elongate body configured to receive the mated connector pair. The latch may include a spring member and an internal passageway configured to receive a miniature circular connector. The latch may include a wire retainer feature to secure the latch to a wire harness.”
The prior art does not address the need for greater retention force between the plug and receptacle of a DIN connector without the use of a latching mechanism. The prior art also does not provide a DIN connector that does not deteriorate by repeated mating cycles of its plug and receptacle.
Hence, there is a need for a DIN connector receptacle with an improved rating of multiples of 1000 cycles, which is compatible with the standard DIN connector plug to consistently provide a reliable connection over thousands of uses. There is also a need for an improved DIN receptacle which is not worn out by repeated mating and un-mating cycles and is corrosion resistant. Since receptacles comprising spring leaf type clips tend to flatten out after repeated cycles, which results in loss of retention force, there is also a need for a receptacle design which would support multiple mating cycles without loss of retention with standard DIN plugs and with no cost increase for the DIN plug.
The following embodiments and aspects thereof are described and illustrated in conjunction with systems, tools and methods, which are meant to be exemplary and illustrative, not limiting in scope.
In some embodiments, the present specification discloses a receptacle configured to receive a plug comprising a plurality of pins, wherein the receptacle comprises a first housing having a circular enclosure wall defined by an exterior surface and an interior surface, wherein the interior surface of the enclosure wall encircles an interior space of the first housing, wherein the circular enclosure wall comprises at least one cavity; a plug receiver having an exterior surface and positioned within the interior space of the first housing, wherein the interior surface of the wall circumferentially surrounds the exterior surface of the plug receiver and is separated from the exterior surface of the plug receiver by a circular gap, and wherein the plug receiver comprises a plurality of connectors each configured to receive one of the plurality of pins of the plug; a first protrusion member positioned in the at least one cavity within the circular enclosure wall; and a retention band circumferentially positioned around the interior space and in physical communication with the circular enclosure wall, wherein the retention band is configured to physically force the first protrusion member out of the at least one cavity and into the circular gap.
Optionally, the first protrusion member is a ball bearing.
Optionally, the retention band is positioned within a groove extending circumferentially around the interior surface of the enclosure wall.
Optionally, the receptacle is a female DIN connector receptacle.
Optionally, the plug is a male DIN connector plug.
Optionally, the first protrusion member is a ball bearing and wherein the ball bearing is made of stainless steel.
Optionally, the receptacle is configured to connect EMG electrodes with an EMG control system via an amplifier.
Optionally, the at least one cavity comprises a first cavity and a second cavity and further comprising a second protrusion member positioned in the second cavity, separate and distinct from the first cavity, within the circular enclosure wall.
Optionally, the retention band is configured to physically force the second protrusion member out of the second cavity and further into the circular gap.
Optionally, the first protrusion member and the second protrusion member are positioned 180 degrees from each other on opposite sides of the circular enclosure wall.
Optionally, the first protrusion member is a ball bearing, the second protrusion member is a ball bearing, and both the first protrusion member and second protrusion member are configured to be pressed against an outside surface of the plug by a spring force provided by the retention band.
Optionally, the first housing and the plug receptacle are molded.
Optionally, the retention band is an O-ring having a durometer rating in a range of 50 to 90 Shore.
Optionally, the receptacle further comprises a second protrusion member positioned in a second cavity, separate and distinct from the at least one cavity, within the circular enclosure wall and a third protrusion member positioned in a third cavity, separate and distinct from the second cavity and the at least one cavity, within the circular enclosure wall.
Optionally, the retention band is an O-ring having a durometer rating in a range of 50 to 90 Shore.
Optionally, the retention band is configured to physically force the second protrusion member out of the second cavity and further into the circular gap and to physically force the third protrusion member out of the third cavity and further into the circular gap.
Optionally, the first protrusion member, the second protrusion member, and the third protrusion member are positioned 120 degrees from each other circumferentially around the circular enclosure wall.
In some embodiments, the present specification discloses a female receptacle configured to connect to a male plug, wherein the female receptacle comprises a first circular housing circumferentially surrounding a plug receptacle, wherein an internal surface of the first circular housing is separated from the plug receptacle by a circular gap and wherein the plug receptacle comprises a plurality of hollow connector spaces each configured to receive a pin of the male plug, the female receptacle further comprising: a first state wherein a first protrusion member is configured to be positioned in a first cavity within the first circular housing and a retention band is configured to be circumferentially positioned around a surface of the first circular housing and physically force the first protrusion member out of the first cavity and further into the circular gap by a first distance; and a second state wherein the first protrusion member is configured to be positioned in the first cavity within the first circular housing and the retention band is configured to be circumferentially positioned around the surface of the first circular housing and physically force the first protrusion member out of the first cavity and further into the circular gap by a second distance, wherein the second distance is less than the first distance and wherein the second state is achieved by inserting the male plug into the female receptacle.
Optionally, the first protrusion member is a ball bearing.
Optionally, the female receptacle further comprises a second cavity, separate and distinct from the first cavity, in the first circular housing and a second protrusion member positioned in the second cavity within the circular enclosure wall.
Optionally, the retention band is configured to physically force the second protrusion member out of the second cavity and further into the circular gap.
In some embodiments, the present specification discloses a connector receptacle for connecting with a corresponding connector plug coupled with electrodes being used for performing EMG procedure on a patient, the receptacle comprising: a first ball bearing pressing against a first end of a housing of the plug and a second ball bearing pressing against a first end of the housing of the plug when the plug is connected to the receptacle for exerting a retention force against the plug, wherein the first and the second ball bearings are pressed against the first and the second ends respectively by using a spring force.
Optionally, the connector receptacle comprises a high mating cycle circular DIN connector receptacle.
Optionally, said receptacle is compatible with a DIN connector plug.
Optionally, the first and the second ball bearings are made of stainless steel.
Optionally, the spring force is provided by at least one retention band.
Optionally, the retention band comprises a high durometer and low compression set O-ring.
Optionally, the retention band exerts a compression force against the first and the second ball bearings, the compression force being transmitted to the housing of the plug for retaining the plug within the receptacle.
Optionally, the spring force is provided by using a circular spring.
Optionally, the spring force is provided by wounding a circular spring around a center portion of the receptacle for pushing the first and the second ball bearings against the housing of the plug.
Optionally, the spring force is provided by using a coiled spring to push the ball bearings inwards towards the housing of the plug when the plug is connected to the receptacle.
Optionally, the receptacle comprises a molded enclosure encompassing a housing of the receptacle.
The aforementioned and other embodiments of the present specification shall be described in greater depth in the drawings and detailed description provided below.
These and other features and advantages of the present specification will be appreciated, as they become better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
In an embodiment, the present specification provides a high mating cycle circular female DIN connector receptacle. In some embodiments, the circular female DIN receptacle comprises one or more curved or beveled components which press against a housing hood of a corresponding compatible male DIN plug, generating friction for obtaining a greater retention force than that demonstrated by the prior art DIN connectors/receptacles. In various embodiments, the curved or beveled components comprise stainless steel ball bearings. The greater retention force inhibits premature disengagement between a male DIN plug and female DIN receptacle.
In embodiments, the female DIN receptacle of the present specification can be used with any standard male DIN connector and is compatible with standardized male DIN plugs. In an embodiment, the female DIN receptacle of the present specification is used in amplifiers (2 and 12 channels) being used in conjunction with EMG equipment.
The present specification is directed towards multiple embodiments. The following disclosure is provided in order to enable a person having ordinary skill in the art to practice the invention. Language used in this specification should not be interpreted as a general disavowal of any one specific embodiment or used to limit the claims beyond the meaning of the terms used therein. The general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Also, the terminology and phraseology used is for the purpose of describing exemplary embodiments and should not be considered limiting. Thus, the present invention is to be accorded the widest scope encompassing numerous alternatives, modifications and equivalents consistent with the principles and features disclosed. For purpose of clarity, details relating to technical material that is known in the technical fields related to the invention have not been described in detail so as not to unnecessarily obscure the present invention. In the description and claims of the application, each of the words “comprise” “include” and “have”, and forms thereof, are not necessarily limited to members in a list with which the words may be associated.
It should be noted herein that any feature or component described in association with a specific embodiment may be used and implemented with any other embodiment unless clearly indicated otherwise.
Referring to
In some embodiments, the female DIN receptacle 202 further comprises first and second protrusion members 204 positioned, respectively, in first and second gaps, spaces or notches within the circular housing 214. In some embodiments, the first and second protrusion members 204 are positioned 180 degrees from each other (that is, diametrically opposite) around the circular housing 214. In some embodiments, the first protrusion member is a ball bearing. In some embodiments, the first and second protrusion members 204 are ball bearings.
As shown in
In various embodiments, the ball bearings 204 are pressed against the housing hood 206 by using a spring force. Referring to
In an embodiment, the spring force is achieved by using a circular retention band or an elastomeric O-ring 210, wherein the retention band 210 presses against each of the ball bearings 204. The circular retention band 210 is circumferentially positioned around an outside surface of the circular housing 214. The retention band 210 is configured to physically force the first and second protrusion members 204 out of their respective first and second gaps and further into the circular gap 207. In some embodiments, when the male DIN plug 208 is not inserted into the female DIN receptacle 202, both the first and second protrusion members 204 are configured to be pressed against an outside surface of the plug receptacle 220 by the spring force provided by the retention band 210. In some embodiments, when the male DIN plug 208 is inserted into the female DIN receptacle 202, both the first and second protrusion members 204 are configured to be pressed against a surface of the male DIN plug 208, such as the housing hood 206, by the spring force provided by the retention band 210.
As can be seen in
As shown in
Stated differently, in the first state, the retention band 210 physically forces the first and second protrusion members 204 out of the respective first and second gaps and further into the circular gap 207 by a first distance. In the second state the retention band 210 physically force the first and second protrusion members 204 out of the respective first and second gaps and further into the circular gap 207 by a second distance. The second distance is less than the first distance when the second state is achieved by the male DIN plug 208 being inserted into the female DIN receptacle 202.
In some embodiments, the retention band 210 has a durometer rating in a range of 50-90 Shore. In an embodiment, the retention band 210 is a high durometer and low compression set O-ring for providing the spring force for pressing the ball bearings 204 against the housing hood 206 of the male DIN plug 208. The retention band 210 is placed in close contact with a ball bearing 204 in order to enable the retention band to press against the ball bearing, thereby creating friction and generating a large retention force between the male DIN plug 208 and the receptacle 202. In some embodiments, approximately 3.68 lbs of force is required to remove a seated male DIN plug 208 from the female DIN receptacle 202, compared to approximately 1.96 lbs of force in the prior art. In some embodiments, a range of 2 lbs or more of force, 2 lbs to 4 lbs of force, or 2 lbs to 5 lbs or force is required to remove a seated male DIN plug 208 from the female DIN receptacle 202, compared to approximately 1.96 lbs of force in the prior art. The retention band 210 is contained within a molded enclosure wall 212 of the female DIN receptacle 202, which also encloses a housing 214 of the female DIN receptacle 202, in order to further enable the retention band 210 to exert a compression force rather than being allowed to expand as the ball bearings 204 are forced out of the gap 207 by the male DIN plug housing hood 206 during disconnection/un-mating.
In another embodiment, a circular spring may be used to generate friction between the ball bearings 204 and the male DIN plug housing hood 206. The circular spring wraps around a center portion or plug receptacle 220 of the female DIN receptacle 202 and presses the ball bearing inward. In other words, a spring force is provided by wounding a circular spring around the center portion or plug receptacle 220 of the female DIN receptacle 202 for pushing the first and the second ball bearings 204 against the housing of the male DIN plug 208. In yet another embodiment, a coiled spring may be used to directly push the ball bearings 204 inward, for generating a retention force between the female DIN receptacle 202 and the male DIN plug 208. Thus, in this embodiment, a spring force is provided by using a coiled spring to push the ball bearings 204 inwards towards the housing of the male DIN plug 208 when the male DIN plug 208 is connected to the female DIN receptacle 202.
Referring to
In some embodiments, each of the female DIN receptacles 306 further comprises first, second and third protrusion members 308 positioned, respectively, in first, second and third gaps, spaces or notches within the circular housing 315. In some embodiments, the first, second and third protrusion members 308 are positioned 120 degrees from each other around the circular housing 315. In some embodiments, the first, second and third protrusion members 308 are ball bearings.
In some embodiments, the first, second and third ball bearings 308 press against a housing hood 318 of the corresponding male DIN plug 310 when the male DIN plug 310 and the female DIN receptacle 306 are mated.
In an embodiment, a spring force is achieved by using a circular retention band or an elastomeric O-ring 312, wherein the retention band 312 presses against each of the ball bearings 308. The circular retention band 312 is circumferentially positioned around an outside surface of the circular housing 315. The retention band 312 is configured to physically force the first, second and third protrusion members 308 out of their respective first, second and third gaps and further into the circular gap 314. In some embodiments, when the male DIN plug 310 is not inserted into the female DIN receptacle 306, the first, second and third protrusion members 308 are configured to be pressed against an outside surface of the plug receptacle 320 by the spring force provided by the retention band 312.
As shown in
Stated differently, in the first state the retention band 312 physically forces the first, second and third protrusion members 308 out of the respective first, second and third gaps and further into the circular gap 314 by a first distance. In the second state the retention band 312 physically forces the first, second and third protrusion members 308 out of the respective first, second and third gaps and further into the circular gap 314 by a second distance. The second distance is less than the first distance when the second state is achieved by the male DIN plug 310 being inserted into the female DIN receptacle 306.
In an embodiment, the ball bearings 308 are positioned approximately 1-3 mm from a top/opening surface of the female DIN receptacle 306. The proximity of the ball bearings 308 to the top/opening surface of the female DIN receptacle 306 allows the user to start the connector engagement process with no physical resistance. When the male DIN plug 310 is not seated in the female DIN receptacle 306, the ball bearings 308 are pushed-in toward the center ‘O’ of the female DIN receptacle 306 (laterally), by the retention band 312, into the circular gap or space 314 configured to receive the housing hood or shell 318 of the male DIN plug 310.
Referring to
In embodiments, the retention band 312 is stretched when positioned within the female DIN receptacle 306, so that it is in a tense state. In some embodiments, a dimensional relationship exists between a diameter of the ball bearing 308 and the size of the gap/opening 314 in the female DIN receptacle 306 and/or the housing hood or shell 318 of the male DIN plug 310 (outer circular portion of the male DIN plug 310 that inserts into the female DIN receptacle 306) to ensure that the male DIN plug 310 seats properly and securely within the female DIN receptacle 306. The diameter of the ball bearing 308 is designed such that it is not too large or small. Too large of a diameter will not allow the ball bearing 308 to be pushed aside as the male DIN plug 310 is inserted and too small of a diameter will not allow the ball bearing 308 to cause friction/resistance to hold the male DIN plug 310 in place. In an embodiment, the male DIN plug 310 comprises a dip/recess 316 to accommodate the ball bearing 308 so that the male DIN plug 310 ‘clicks’ into place when seated in the female DIN receptacle 306 when the ball bearings 308 mate with the recess 316.
In various embodiments, the number of ball bearings and/or durometer rating of the retention band may be changed to modulate the force required to remove the male DIN plug from the male DIN receptacle.
The above examples are merely illustrative of the many applications of the system of present specification. Although only a few embodiments of the present specification have been described herein, it should be understood that the present specification might be embodied in many other specific forms without departing from the spirit or scope of the specification. Therefore, the present examples and embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the specification may be modified within the scope of the appended claims.
The present application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/747,748, entitled “Connector Receptacle” and filed on Jan. 21, 2020, which relies on U.S. Patent Provisional Application No. 62/794,884, of the same title and filed on Jan. 21, 2019, for priority, both of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2320709 | Arnesen | Jun 1943 | A |
2807259 | Guerriero | Sep 1957 | A |
2950437 | Stahl | Aug 1960 | A |
3165340 | Kuehl | Jan 1965 | A |
3271723 | Willing | Sep 1966 | A |
3659250 | Horton | Apr 1972 | A |
3682162 | Colyer | Aug 1972 | A |
3985125 | Rose | Oct 1976 | A |
3993859 | McNeel | Nov 1976 | A |
4155353 | Rea | May 1979 | A |
4262306 | Renner | Apr 1981 | A |
4263899 | Burgin | Apr 1981 | A |
4545374 | Jacobson | Oct 1985 | A |
4562832 | Wilder | Jan 1986 | A |
4616635 | Caspar | Oct 1986 | A |
4705049 | John | Nov 1987 | A |
4716901 | Jackson | Jan 1988 | A |
4743959 | Frederiksen | May 1988 | A |
4765311 | Kulik | Aug 1988 | A |
4817587 | Janese | Apr 1989 | A |
4862891 | Smith | Sep 1989 | A |
4889502 | Althouse | Dec 1989 | A |
4914508 | Music | Apr 1990 | A |
5107845 | Guern | Apr 1992 | A |
5171279 | Mathews | Dec 1992 | A |
5196015 | Neubardt | Mar 1993 | A |
5284153 | Raymond | Feb 1994 | A |
5284154 | Raymond | Feb 1994 | A |
5299563 | Seton | Apr 1994 | A |
5377667 | Patton | Jan 1995 | A |
5438989 | Hochman | Aug 1995 | A |
5462448 | Kida | Oct 1995 | A |
5472426 | Bonati | Dec 1995 | A |
5474558 | Neubardt | Dec 1995 | A |
5540235 | Wilson | Jul 1996 | A |
5544286 | Laney | Aug 1996 | A |
5560372 | Cory | Oct 1996 | A |
5565779 | Arakawa | Oct 1996 | A |
5578060 | Pohl | Nov 1996 | A |
5601608 | Mouchawar | Feb 1997 | A |
5602585 | Dickinson | Feb 1997 | A |
5625759 | Freeman | Apr 1997 | A |
5648815 | Toba | Jul 1997 | A |
5664029 | Callahan | Sep 1997 | A |
5681265 | Maeda | Oct 1997 | A |
5684887 | Lee | Nov 1997 | A |
5728046 | Mayer | Mar 1998 | A |
5741261 | Moskovitz | Apr 1998 | A |
5766133 | Faisandier | Jun 1998 | A |
5772661 | Michelson | Jun 1998 | A |
5775331 | Raymond | Jul 1998 | A |
5775931 | Jones | Jul 1998 | A |
5785648 | Min | Jul 1998 | A |
5792044 | Foley | Aug 1998 | A |
5795291 | Koros | Aug 1998 | A |
5830150 | Palmer | Nov 1998 | A |
5847755 | Wixson | Dec 1998 | A |
5860973 | Michelson | Jan 1999 | A |
5868668 | Weiss | Feb 1999 | A |
5885210 | Cox | Mar 1999 | A |
5891147 | Moskovitz | Apr 1999 | A |
5928139 | Koros | Jul 1999 | A |
5928158 | Aristides | Jul 1999 | A |
5930379 | Rehg | Jul 1999 | A |
5931777 | Sava | Aug 1999 | A |
5933929 | Kawakami | Aug 1999 | A |
5944658 | Koros | Aug 1999 | A |
5954635 | Foley | Sep 1999 | A |
5993385 | Johnston | Nov 1999 | A |
6004312 | Finneran | Dec 1999 | A |
6004341 | Zhu | Dec 1999 | A |
6026180 | Wittenstein | Feb 2000 | A |
6042540 | Johnston | Mar 2000 | A |
6062216 | Corn | May 2000 | A |
6074343 | Nathanson | Jun 2000 | A |
6088878 | Antonucci | Jul 2000 | A |
6095987 | Shmulewitz | Aug 2000 | A |
6109948 | Kuo | Aug 2000 | A |
6116941 | Kuo | Sep 2000 | A |
6119306 | Antonucci | Sep 2000 | A |
6139493 | Koros | Oct 2000 | A |
6152871 | Foley | Nov 2000 | A |
6181961 | Prass | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6196969 | Bester | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6200331 | Swartz | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206826 | Mathews | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210202 | Kuo | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224545 | Cocchia | May 2001 | B1 |
6236874 | Devlin | May 2001 | B1 |
6241548 | Kuo | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6259945 | Epstein | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264491 | Lord | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266558 | Gozani | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273740 | Lord | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287322 | Zhu | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6302842 | Auerbach | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306100 | Prass | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309349 | Bertolero | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6325764 | Griffith | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334068 | Hacker | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6373890 | Freeman | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6425859 | Foley | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6450952 | Rioux | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6466817 | Kaula | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473639 | Fischell | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6500128 | Marino | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6535759 | Epstein | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6579114 | Lord | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6609018 | Cory | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6712795 | Cohen | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6799931 | Kwilosz | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6805668 | Cadwell | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6837716 | Brazas | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6847849 | Mamo | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6851430 | Tsou | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6869301 | Shimizu | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6870109 | Villarreal | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6926728 | Zucherman | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6945933 | Branch | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7072521 | Cadwell | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7089059 | Pless | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7104965 | Jiang | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7177677 | Kaula | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7214197 | Prass | May 2007 | B2 |
7230688 | Villarreal | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7261688 | Smith | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7374448 | Jepsen | May 2008 | B2 |
7470236 | Kelleher | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7522953 | Kaula | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7713210 | Byrd | May 2010 | B2 |
7801601 | Maschino | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7914350 | Bozich | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7963927 | Kelleher | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7983761 | Giuntoli | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8108039 | Saliga | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8147421 | Farquhar | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8160694 | Salmon | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8192437 | Simonson | Jun 2012 | B2 |
D670656 | Jepsen | Nov 2012 | S |
8323208 | Davis | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8439703 | Natoli | May 2013 | B2 |
8876813 | Min | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8942797 | Bartol | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8958869 | Kelleher | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9084551 | Brunnett | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9138586 | Eiger | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9155503 | Cadwell | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9295401 | Cadwell | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9352153 | Van Dijk | May 2016 | B2 |
9730634 | Cadwell | Aug 2017 | B2 |
10238467 | Cadwell | Mar 2019 | B2 |
11128076 | Villarreal | Sep 2021 | B2 |
20010049510 | Burr | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020007188 | Arambula | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020009916 | Lord | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020088098 | Bouley | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095080 | Cory | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030045808 | Kaula | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030074033 | Pless | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040030258 | Williams | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040127810 | Sackellares | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040192100 | Shimizu | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050003682 | Brazas | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050075578 | Gharib | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085743 | Hacker | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050148927 | Ludin | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050182454 | Gharib | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182456 | Ziobro | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050277844 | Strother | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060009754 | Boese | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060085048 | Cory | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085049 | Cory | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060122514 | Byrd | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060135877 | Giftakis | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060258951 | Bleich | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060276720 | McGinnis | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070016097 | Farquhar | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070021682 | Gharib | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070032841 | Urmey | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070046471 | Nyalamadugu | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049962 | Marino | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070184422 | Takahashi | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070202005 | Maschke | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080027507 | Bijelic | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080058606 | Miles | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065144 | Marino | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071191 | Kelleher | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082136 | Gaudiani | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097164 | Miles | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080108244 | Jepsen | May 2008 | A1 |
20080167574 | Farquhar | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183096 | Snyder | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080194970 | Steers | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080269777 | Appenrodt | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281313 | Fagin | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080312520 | Rowlandson | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090018399 | Martinelli | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090043221 | Kaplan | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090088660 | McMorrow | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105604 | Bertagnoli | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090177112 | Gharib | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090196471 | Goetz | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204016 | Gharib | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090209879 | Kaula | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090259108 | Miles | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090279767 | Kukuk | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100036384 | Gorek | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100106011 | Byrd | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100113898 | Kim | May 2010 | A1 |
20100152604 | Kaula | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100168603 | Himes | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191305 | Imran | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100249638 | Liley | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100286554 | Davis | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100317931 | Sarkela | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100317989 | Gharib | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110082383 | Cory | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110184308 | Kaula | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110295579 | Tang | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110313530 | Gharib | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120003862 | Newman | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120046531 | Hua | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120071779 | Sarkela | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120109000 | Kaula | May 2012 | A1 |
20120109004 | Cadwell | May 2012 | A1 |
20120209082 | Al-Ali | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209346 | Bikson | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120220891 | Kaula | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120238855 | Lanning | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120238893 | Farquhar | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120265040 | Ito | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120296230 | Davis | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130012880 | Blomquist | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130109996 | Turnbull | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138010 | Nierenberg | May 2013 | A1 |
20130152657 | Swinehart | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130197603 | Eiger | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130204315 | Wongsarnpigoon | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130253447 | Ball | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130304407 | George | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140121555 | Scott | May 2014 | A1 |
20140127926 | Condo | May 2014 | A1 |
20140275926 | Scott | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276181 | Sun | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150150512 | Warner | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150230749 | Gharib | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150238106 | Lappalainen | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150351643 | Edwards | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150372433 | Lisogurski | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160000382 | Jain | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160174861 | Cadwell | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160270679 | Mahon | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160328991 | Simpson | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170056663 | Kaemmerer | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170100047 | Edwards | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20180117309 | Rapoport | May 2018 | A1 |
20180140829 | Ramos De Miguel, Sr. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180161123 | Cadwell | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180198218 | Regan | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180256097 | Bray | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180296277 | Schwartz | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20190190187 | Fukazawa | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20200022603 | Cardenas | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200108246 | Cadwell | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200297282 | Batzer | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200330772 | Hartmann-Bax | Oct 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
104766176 | Jul 2015 | CN |
102014008684 | Jan 2016 | DE |
298268 | Jan 1989 | EP |
0863719 | Sep 1998 | EP |
890341 | Jan 1999 | EP |
972538 | Jan 2000 | EP |
1182965 | Mar 2002 | EP |
2173238 | Apr 2010 | EP |
H11513592 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2008546509 | Dec 2008 | JP |
2000038574 | Jul 2000 | WO |
2000066217 | Nov 2000 | WO |
2001037728 | May 2001 | WO |
2003005887 | Jan 2003 | WO |
2005030318 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2006042241 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2016028822 | Feb 2016 | WO |
2016105571 | Jun 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Calancie, et. al., “Threshold-level repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation for intraoperative monitoring of central motor conduction”, J. Neurosurg 95:161-168 (2001). |
Deletis et al, “The role of intraoperative neurophysiology in the protection or documentation of surgically induced injury to the spinal cord”, Correspondence Address: Hyman Newman Institute for Neurology & Neurosurgery, Beth Israel Medical Center, 170 East End Ave., Room 311, NY 10128. |
Calancie, et. al., Stimulus-Evoked EMG Monitoring During Transpedicular Lumbosacral Spine Instrumentation, Initial Clinical Results, 19 (24):2780-2786 (1994). |
Lenke, et. al., “Triggered Electromyographic Threshold for Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement, An Animal Model and Clinical Correlation”, 20 (14):1585-1591 (1995). |
Raymond, et. al., “The NerveSeeker: A System for Automated Nerve Localization”, Regional Anesthesia 17:151-162 (1992). |
Hinrichs, et al., “A trend-detection algorithm for intraoperative EEG monitoring”, Med. Eng. Phys. 18 (8):626-631 (1996). |
Raymond J. Gardocki, MD, “Tubular diskectomy minimizes collateral damage”, AAOS Now, Sep. 2009 Issue, http://www.aaos.org/news/aaosnow/sep09/clinical12.asp. |
Butterworth et. al., “Effects of Halothane and Enflurane on Firing Threshold of Frog Myelinated Axon”, Journal of Physiology 411:493-516, (1989) From the Anesthesia Research Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA 02115, jp.physoc.org. |
Rose et al., “Persistently Electrified Pedicle Stimulation Instruments in Spinal Instrumentation: Technique and Protocol Development”, Spine: 22(3): 334-343 (1997). |
Minahan, et. al., “The Effect of Neuromuscular Blockade on Pedicle Screw Stimulation Thresholds” 25(19):2526-2530 (2000). |
Lomanto et al., “7th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery” Singapore, Jun. 1-4, 2000 Monduzzi Editore S.p.A.; email: monduzzi@monduzzi.com, pp. 97-103 and 105-111. |
H.M. Mayer, “Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, A Surgical Manual”, Chapter 12, pp. 117-131 (2000). |
Holland, et al., “Continuous Electromyographic Monitoring to Detect Nerve Root Injury During Thoracolumbar Scoliosis Surgery”, 22 (21):2547-2550 (1997), Lippincott-Raven Publishers. |
Bergey et al., “Endoscopic Lateral Transpsoas Approach to the Lumbar Spine”, SPINE 29 (15):1681-1688 (2004). |
Holland, “Spine Update, Intraoperative Electromyography During Thoracolumbar Spinal Surgery”, 23 (17):1915-1922 (1998). |
Dezawa et al., “Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Lateral Approach to the Lumbar Spine: A New Approach, Technique, and Clinical Trial”, Journal of Spinal Disorders 13(2):138-143 (2000). |
Greenblatt, et. al., “Needle Nerve Stimulator-Locator”, 41 (5):599-602 (1962). |
Goldstein, et. al., “Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Surgery of the Lumbar Spine”, Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics, 7 (1):27-35 (1997). |
Epstein, et al., “Evaluation of Intraoperative Somatosensory-Evoked Potential Monitoring During 100 Cervical Operations”, 18(6):737-747 (1993), J.B. Lippincott Company. |
Glassman, et. al., “A Prospective Analysis of Intraoperative Electromyographic Monitoring of Pedicle Screw Placement with Computed Tomographic Scan Confirmation”, 20(12):1375-1379. |
Reidy, et. al., “Evaluation of electromyographic monitoring during insertion of thoracic pedicle screws”, British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 83 (7):1009-1014, (2001). |
Dickman, et al., “Techniques in Neurosurgery”, National Library of Medicine, 3 (4) 301-307 (1997). |
Michael R. Isley, et. al., “Recent Advances in Intraoperative Neuromonitoring of Spinal Cord Function: Pedicle Screw Stimulation Techniques”, Am. J. End Technol. 37:93-126 (1997). |
Bertagnoli, et. al., “The AnteroLateral transPsoatic Approach (ALPA), A New Technique for Implanting Prosthetic Disc-Nucleus Devices”, 16 (4):398-404 (2003). |
Mathews et al., “Laparoscopic Discectomy With Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, A Preliminary Review”, 20 (16):1797-1802, (1995), Lippincott-Raven Publishers. |
MaGuire, et. al., “Evaluation of Intrapedicular Screw Position Using Intraoperative Evoked Electromyography”, 20 (9):1068-1074 (1995). |
Pimenta et. al., “Implante de prótese de núcleo pulposo: análise inicial”, J Bras Neurocirurg 12 (2):93-96, (2001). |
Kossmann, et. al., “Minimally Invasive Vertebral Replacement with Cages in Thoracic and Lumbar Spine”, European Journal of Trauma, 2001, No. 6, pp. 292-300. |
Kossmann et al., “The use of a retractor system (SynFrame) for open, minimal invasive reconstruction of the anterior column of the thoracic and lumbar spine”, 10:396-402 (2001). |
Kevin T. Foley, et. al., “Microendoscipic Discectomy” Techniques in Neurosurgery, 3:(4):301-307, © 1997 Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia. |
Hovey, A Guide to Motor Nerve Monitoring, pp. 1-31, Mar. 20, 1998, The Magstim Company Limited. |
Danesh-Clough, et. al., “The Use of Evoked EMG in Detecting Misplaced Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screws”, 26(12):1313-1316 (2001). |
Clements, et. al., “Evoked and Spontaneous Electromyography to Evaluate Lumbosacral Pedicle Screw Placement”, 21 (5):600-604 (1996). |
Aage R. Møller, “Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring”, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine Pennsylvania, © 1995 by Harwood Academic Publishers GmbH. |
Calancie, et. al., “Threshold-level multipulse transcranial electrical stimulation of motor cortex for intraoperative monitoring of spinal motor tracts: description of method and comparison to somatosensory evoked potential monitoring” J Neurosurg 88:457-470 (1998). |
Urmey “Using the nerve stimulator for peripheral or plexus nerve blocks” Minerva Anesthesiology 2006; 72:467-71. |
Digitimer Ltd., 37 Hydeway, Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire. AL7 3BE England, email:sales@digitimer.com, website: www.digitimer.com, “Constant Current High Voltage Stimulator, Model DS7A, For Percutaneous Stimulation of Nerve and Muscle Tissue”. |
Carl T. Brighton, “Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research”, Clinical Orthopaedics and related research No. 384, pp. 82-100 (2001). |
Teresa Riordan “Patents; A businessman invents a device to give laparoscopic surgeons a better view of their worK”, New York Times www.nytimes.com/2004/29/business/patents-businessman-invents-device-give-la (Mar. 2004). |
Bose, et. al., “Neurophysiologic Monitoring of Spinal Nerve Root Function During Instrumented Posterior Lumbar Spine Surgery”, 27 (13):1440-1450 (2002). |
Chapter 9, “Root Finding and Nonlinear Sets of Equations”, Chapter 9:350-354, http://www.nr.com. |
Welch, et. al., “Evaluation with evoked and spontaneous electromyography during lumbar instrumentation: a prospective study”, J Neurosurg 87:397-402, (1997). |
Medtronic, “Nerve Integrity Monitor, Intraoperative EMG Monitor, User's Guide”, Medtronic Xomed U.K. Ltd., Unit 5, West Point Row, Great Park Road, Almondsbury, Bristol B5324QG, England, pp. 1-39. |
Ford et al, Electrical characteristics of peripheral nerve stimulators, implications for nerve localization, Dept. of Anesthesia, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45267, pp. 73-77. |
Zouridakis, et. al., “A Concise Guide to Intraoperative Monitoring”, Library of Congress card No. 00-046750, Chapters, p. 21, chapter 4, p. 58 and chapter 7 pp. 119-120. |
Toleikis, et. al., “The usefulness of Electrical Stimulation for Assessing Pedicle Screw Placements”, Journal of Spinal Disorders, 13 (4):283-289 (2000). |
U.Schick, et. al., “Microendoscopic lumbar discectomy versus open surgery: an intraoperative EMG study”, pp. 20-26, Published online: Jul. 31, 2001 © Springer-Verlag 2001. |
Vaccaro, et. al., “Principles and Practice of Spine Surgery”, Mosby, Inc. © 2003, Chapter 21, pp. 275-281. |
Vincent C. Traynelis, “Spinal arthroplasty”, Neurosurg Focus 13 (2):1-7. Article 10, (2002). |
International Search Report for PCT/US2017/062559, dated Jan. 26, 2018. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2019/063793, dated Feb. 19, 2020. |
Brainstorm Website, http://neuroimage.usc.edu/brainstorm/ accessed online Oct. 9, 2021, available online Apr. 11, 2018. (Year: 2018). |
Compumedics Website, “Compumedics Profusion EEG 4” accessed online Oct. 9, 2021, available online Feb. 23, 2017 (ttps://www.compumedics.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/AD125-02-Profusion-EEG4-brochureLR.pdf (Year:2017). |
Intelimed Website, “Compumedics Profusion EEG 5 Top Features” accessed online Oct. 9, 2021, available online Sep. 30, 2014 2014). |
Deff Corporation, No more confusion about which direction to plug in. A USB cable that can be plugged in both ways is now available. A connector is equipped with an LED indicator to check a charging status of a smartphone. Nov. 6, 2015 (Dec. 28, 2021 Search) Internet URL:https://deff.co.jp/news/dca-mbled (Document showing known technology). |
“Long, S; “Phase Locked Loop Circuits”, Apr. 27, 2005”. (Year: 2005). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220045450 A1 | Feb 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62794884 | Jan 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16747748 | Jan 2020 | US |
Child | 17445800 | US |