The system of the present application relates to external airbags for a vehicle. In particular, the system of the present application relates to a constant area vent for an external airbag for an aircraft.
Conventional airbags are manufactured in a wide variety of shapes and sizes. Conventional airbags have flexible vents which are susceptible to collapse during crash attenuation. Although the developments in airbag systems have produced significant improvements, considerable shortcomings remain.
The novel features believed characteristic of the system of the present application are set forth in the appended claims. However, the system itself, as well as a preferred mode of use, and further objectives and advantages thereof, will best be understood by reference to the following detailed description when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which the leftmost significant digit(s) in the reference numerals denote(s) the first figure in which the respective reference numerals appear, wherein:
While the system of the present application is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and are herein described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the description herein of specific embodiments is not intended to limit the method to the particular forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the application as defined by the appended claims.
Illustrative embodiments of the system of the present application are described below. In the interest of clarity, not all features of an actual implementation are described in this specification. It will of course be appreciated that in the development of any such actual embodiment, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developer's specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which will vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it will be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time-consuming but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking for those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure.
In the specification, reference may be made to the spatial relationships between various components and to the spatial orientation of various aspects of components as the devices are depicted in the attached drawings. However, as will be recognized by those skilled in the art after a complete reading of the present application, the devices, members, apparatuses, etc. described herein may be positioned in any desired orientation. Thus, the use of terms such as “above,” “below,” “upper,” “lower,” or other like terms to describe a spatial relationship between various components or to describe the spatial orientation of aspects of such components should be understood to describe a relative relationship between the components or a spatial orientation of aspects of such components, respectively, as the device described herein may be oriented in any desired direction.
A malfunction with rotor system 103, the drive system, or any other flight critical component, may necessitate a descent from altitude at a higher rate of speed than is desirable. If the rotorcraft impacts an impact surface at an excessively high rate, the occupants of rotorcraft 101 may be severely injured due to the sudden decelerative forces. Further, such an impact may cause rotorcraft 101 to be severely damaged by the decelerative forces exerted on rotorcraft 101. To reduce these forces, the crash attenuation system includes at least one airbag assembly 105. Each airbag assembly 105 contains an inflatable airbag bladder 121 that is inflated prior to impact. Each airbag is vented during impact for energy attenuation in part to prevent an undesired rebound/secondary impact as well as to avoid pitch-over and roll-over tendency. In
Referring now to
The sensor system 117 is shown in
It is desirable for each airbag assembly 105 to be as efficient as possible at attenuating energy during a crash. Because each airbag assembly 105 is carried by an aircraft, each airbag assembly 105 ideally provides maximum energy attenuation while adding minimum weight to the aircraft. Furthermore, an unnecessarily heavy airbag assembly 105 increases the airframe structure required to support the weight, and also decreases the payload capabilities of the rotorcraft 101. Further, an efficient external airbag can have a lower profile than a less efficient airbag, thereby reducing aerodynamic drag, both while in a stowed position and an inflated position.
The present application includes the discovery that certain airbag vent systems provide better energy attenuation, as well as pitch-over and roll-over stability than others. More specifically, venting of pressurized gas from within the airbag is an important part of providing optimal energy attenuation and aircraft stability during a crash landing. Furthermore, proper venting reduces high peak acceleration that might other occur if the vent were to collapse, resulting in blockage and reducing effectiveness of the vent itself, during crash attenuation.
Referring to
Referring now to
Still referring to
Referring now to
Vent assembly 123 includes a vent support 601 for preserving the area of vent opening 603 during compression of airbag bladder 121. More specifically, vent support 601 keeps the open area of vent opening 603 constant by preventing deformation of vent opening 603 due to hoop stresses. Vent support 601 is preferably of a rigid material, such as composite, plastic, and metal, to name a few. Vent support 601 may be attached to airbag bladder 121 in a variety of ways. For example,
The airbag assembly of the present application provides significant advantages, including providing a vent assembly with a vent support to maintain constant area venting during compression of the airbag bladder.
The particular embodiments disclosed above are illustrative only, as the application may be modified and practiced in different but equivalent manners apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings herein. Furthermore, no limitations are intended to the details of construction or design herein shown, other than as described in the claims below. It is therefore evident that the particular embodiments disclosed above may be altered or modified and all such variations are considered within the scope and spirit of the application. Accordingly, the protection sought herein is as set forth in the claims below. It is apparent that a system with significant advantages has been described and illustrated. Although the system of the present application is shown in a limited number of forms, it is not limited to just these forms, but is amenable to various changes and modifications without departing from the spirit thereof.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2011/030514 | 3/30/2011 | WO | 00 | 11/26/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/134462 | 10/4/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2131528 | Soyer | Sep 1938 | A |
2713466 | Fletcher et al. | Jul 1955 | A |
3117752 | Gillmore | Jan 1964 | A |
3602661 | Liedberg | Aug 1971 | A |
3603535 | DePolo | Sep 1971 | A |
3727716 | Jenkins | Apr 1973 | A |
3738597 | Earl et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3964698 | Earl | Jun 1976 | A |
3981462 | Berezhnoi et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
3990658 | Letsinger | Nov 1976 | A |
4004761 | McAvoy | Jan 1977 | A |
4032088 | McAvoy | Jun 1977 | A |
4068606 | Van Veldhuzen | Jan 1978 | A |
4205811 | Palm et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4657516 | Tassy | Apr 1987 | A |
4923145 | Broadhurst | May 1990 | A |
5259574 | Carrot | Nov 1993 | A |
5356097 | Chalupa | Oct 1994 | A |
5407150 | Sadleir | Apr 1995 | A |
5560568 | Schmittle | Oct 1996 | A |
5725244 | Cundill | Mar 1998 | A |
5765778 | Otsuka | Jun 1998 | A |
5836544 | Gentile | Nov 1998 | A |
5992794 | Rotman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6062599 | Forbes et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070546 | Downey et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6158691 | Menne et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6227325 | Shah | May 2001 | B1 |
6273463 | Peterson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6338456 | Cairo-Iocco et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6439256 | Koelsch et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6565431 | Villela | May 2003 | B1 |
6648371 | Vendely et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6820898 | Dinsdale et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6886776 | Wagner et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7232001 | Hakki et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7954752 | Smith et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8418957 | Smith et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
20020027353 | Keshavaraj | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030062443 | Wagner et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030192730 | Kikuchi et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20050077426 | Simard | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20070246922 | Manssart | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080017754 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080087511 | Taylor et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20100044507 | Smith et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3024551 | Jan 1982 | DE |
4118300 | Dec 1992 | DE |
0423981 | Oct 1990 | EP |
0869058 | Oct 1998 | EP |
1403180 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1575810 | Sep 2005 | EP |
5322496 | Dec 1993 | JP |
8192797 | Jul 1996 | JP |
11268605 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2006046038 | May 2006 | WO |
WO 2008054401 | May 2008 | WO |
2011014153 | Feb 2011 | WO |
2012115633 | Aug 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“CABS Cockpit Air Bag System,” Armor Holdings Aerospace & Defense Group, Jan. 2006. |
Akif Bolukbasi, “Active Crash Protection Systems for UAVs,” American Helicopter Society Annual Forum 63 Proceedings, Virginia Beach, VA, May 1-3, 2007. |
Akif Bolukbasi, “Active Crash Protection Systems for Rotorcraft,” Center for Rotorcraft Innovation/National Rotorcraft Technology Center Program 2007 Year End Review, Phoenix, AZ, Feb. 19-20, 2008. |
Rejection Notice for Japanese Application No. 2008-542336, dated Feb. 23, 2011, 1 page. |
REAPS Rotorcraft Protection, Brochure by RAFAEL Armament Development Authority, Ltd., Ordnance Systems Division, Haifa, Israel. |
Kevin Coyne, F-111 Crew Module Escape and Survival Systems, pp. 1-10, http://www.f-111.net/ejection.htm. |
Specification for PCT/US09/51821 filed on Jul. 27, 2009. |
Response to Invitation to Correct Defects for PCT/US09/51821 dated Sep. 16, 2009. |
International Search Report for PCT/US09/51821 dated Sep. 11, 2009. |
Specification for PCT/US07/82140 filed on Oct. 22, 2007. |
International Search Report for PCT/US07/82140 dated Apr. 18, 2008. |
Article 34 Amendments for PCT/US07/82140 filed on Aug. 18, 2008. |
International Publication of PCT/US07/82140 published on Apr. 30, 2009. |
Article 34 Amendments for PCT/US07/82140 filed on Oct. 13, 2009. |
Office Action from Corresponding Canadian Application No. 2,628,380, dated Dec. 23, 2009. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/089,884, dated Aug. 6, 2010. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/089,884, dated Dec. 8, 2010. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/089,884, dated Jan. 26, 2011. |
Office Action from Corresponding Canadian Application No. 2,628,380, dated Feb. 8, 2011. |
First Examination Report from Corresponding Mexican Application No. Mx/2008/0060008, dated Mar. 22, 2011; Received in Office Apr. 6, 2011. |
International Search Report for PCT/US06/43706 dated Jul. 18, 2008. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US06/43706 dated Mar. 19, 2009. |
First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200680041870.7 by the Chinese Patent Office, dated Apr. 29, 2011. |
Notification of the Decision to Grant a Patent Right for Patent for Invention issued by the Patent Office of the People's Republic of China for related Chinese Patent Application No. 200680041870.7 on Jan. 21, 2012. |
First Office Action from application 2007801012216. Issued from the Chinese Patent Office dated Apr. 27, 2012, 5 pages. |
Extended European Search Report dated Aug. 6, 2012 from related European Patent Application No. 07844510.3. |
Specification for PCT/US06/43706 filed Nov. 8, 2006. |
Response to Invitation to Correct Defects for PCT/US06/43706 dated Apr. 7, 2008. |
Publication of PCT/US06/43706 dated May 8, 2008. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed by IPEA/US on Sep. 28, 2011 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US09/51815, 4 pages. |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority mailed by ISA/USA, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Apr. 25, 2011 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US11/025857, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority mailed by ISA/USA, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Jun. 13, 2011 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US11/030514, 8 pages. |
International Publication of related PCT Application No. PCT/US/09/051821 filed Jul. 27, 2009; Publication No. WO 2011/014153 A1. |
Office Action dated Aug. 6, 2014 from counterpart EP App. No. 11859409.2. |
Office Action dated Sep. 8, 2014 from counterpart CA App. No. 2,828,084. |
Office Action dated Oct. 2, 2014 from counterpart CA App. No. 2,830,894. |
Extended European Search Report dated Jul. 10, 2014 from counterpart EP App. No. 11862579.7. |
Office Action dated Mar. 26, 2015 from counterpart EP App. No. 11862579.7. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130068883 A1 | Mar 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/US2011/025857 | Mar 2012 | US |
Child | 13699758 | US |