1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to mechanisms that employ a force applied in one direction to lift or support a load in a direction perpendicular to the direction of the applied force. Such mechanisms find application in many fields and may be employed, for example, in tools for use in wells or pipes, such as centralizers, calipers, anchoring devices, and tractors. The invention is particularly applicable to the field of tractors for conveying logging and service tools in deviated or horizontal oil and gas wells, or in pipelines, where such tools may not be readily conveyed by the force of gravity. The invention may also be employed in jacking devices.
2. Description of Related Art
After an oil or gas well is drilled, it is often necessary to log the well with various measuring instruments. This is usually done with wireline logging tools lowered inside the well on a logging cable. Similarly, pipelines may require inspection and, therefore, the movement of various measuring tools along the pipe.
Some logging tools can operate properly only if they are positioned at the center of the well or pipe. This is usually done with centralizers. All centralizers operate on the same general principle. Equally spaced, multiple bow springs or linkages of various kinds are extended radially from a central hub toward the wellbore or pipe wall. These springs or linkages come into contact with the wellbore or pipe wall and exert radial forces on it which tend to move the body of the tool away from the wall. Since the bow springs and linkages are usually symmetric with respect to the central hub, they tend to position the tool at the center of the well. Hence, the radial forces exerted by these devices are often referred to as centralizing forces.
Centralizers usually remain open throughout their operation. In other words, their linkages are always biased toward the wellbore wall and they always remain in contact with the wellbore wall. Most centralizers are designed such that they can operate in a large range of wellbore sizes. As the centralizers expand or contract radially to accommodate changes in the size of the wellbore, their centralizing forces may vary. In wells that are nearly vertical, the variation in radial force is not a problem because the radial component of the tool weight is small and even weak centralizers can cope with it. In addition, the centralizing force and the frictional drag resulting from it are such a small fraction of the total tension on the logging cable that its variability can be neglected for all practical purposes.
Wells that have horizontal or highly deviated sections may, however, present problems. In a horizontal section of the well, the centralizer must be strong enough to lift the entire weight of the tool off the wellbore wall. On the one hand, the minimum level of the centralizing force must be made equal to the weight of the tool to ensure proper operation in all wellbore sizes. On the other hand, in a different wellbore size, the force exerted by the centralizer may be excessive, causing extra frictional drag that impairs the motion of the tools along the well. This situation has led to the development of constant force centralizers, which have been previously disclosed and are commercially available. The present invention, however, presents a new approach to constructing such a constant force centralizer.
Similar to centralizers, calipers extend arms or linkages from the tool body toward the wellbore wall. One difference between centralizers and calipers is that the arms of a caliper may be individually activated and may not open the same amount. Another difference is that caliper arms are usually selectively opened and closed into the tool body by some mechanical means. Thus, the arms of a caliper do not necessarily remain in contact with the wellbore wall at all times.
Various measuring instruments are often mounted on the caliper arms. In order to ensure the proper operation of some of these measuring instruments, it is often necessary to maintain a certain range of the magnitude of the radial force with which the caliper arms are pressed toward the wellbore wall. This requirement is sometimes difficult to achieve in horizontal sections of the well and variable wellbore sizes. The reason is that, like centralizers, the mechanical advantage of caliper linkages varies with wellbore size. Thus, the mechanical devices responsible for opening and closing the caliper must provide variable force output. This usually leads to poor efficiency of the mechanical device and its under-utilization in a large range of wellbore sizes. It is, therefore, beneficial to develop caliper linkage mechanisms that apply virtually constant radial forces given a constant mechanical input from the actuation device. The present invention provides such a mechanism.
Horizontal and highly deviated wells present yet another problem. Logging tools cannot be effectively conveyed into such wells by the force of gravity. This has led to the development of alternative conveyance methods. One such method is based on the use of a downhole tractor that pulls or pushes logging tools along the well.
Downhole tractors, such as those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,954,131 and 6,179,055 B1, use various radially expandable mechanisms to force wheels or anchoring devices against the wellbore wall. Independent of the principle by which the motion with respect to the wellbore wall is achieved, the traction force that a tractor can generate is directly proportional to the radial force applied by the mechanism. Similar to centralizers and calipers, downhole tractors are designed to operate in a wide range of wellbore sizes. Like centralizers, they also have the problem of radial force variability as a function of wellbore size. Typically, for a given expansion mechanism, the traction force diminishes with wellbore size. It is advantageous if the radial force that a tractor generates is constant. However, no satisfactory solution to this problem has thusfar been disclosed.
Some tractors use several sets of different size linkages to provide a relatively constant traction force in a wide range of wellbore sizes. These mechanisms must, however, be replaced at the surface, which is very inconvenient. In addition, some wells are drilled with a variety of wellbore sizes that no single mechanism can handle. The present invention provides a mechanism that may be used with all known tractoring concepts to achieve a constant radial force and, therefore, consistent traction over a very wide range of wellbore sizes.
Centralizers, calipers, and tractors all rely on radially expandable mechanisms to perform their functions. These mechanisms may be either active or passive. The active mechanisms are powered by hydraulic or electric actuators. They are normally closed and are activated only during service. The passive mechanisms usually rely on springs to generate the outward radial force. While passive constant force mechanisms are commercially available, no active constant force mechanism has been disclosed. The present invention may be used either as a passive or an active mechanism that is capable of producing a substantially constant radial force.
The prior art that is relevant to the principle of operation of the invention discloses either the construction of constant force centralizers or the use of wedges in centralizing devices. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,615,386 discloses a centralizer that has approximately constant radial forces through a range of wellbore sizes. The constancy of the force is achieved by a combination of two springs with different characteristics. The sum of the two spring forces remains approximately constant over a wide range of movement of the centralizer arms. The advantage of this approach lies in its simplicity. The disadvantage is that it can only be used for centralizers, but not for calipers and anchoring devices that require selective opening and closing of the arms. Another disadvantage is that this operating principle requires the centralizer to be quite long, which may be undesirable in some instances. Similarly, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,557,327 and 4,830,105 teach centralizing devices that achieve a virtually constant centralizing force by combining at least two springs of different kinds. The advantages and disadvantages of these devices are similar to those discussed above. U.S. Pat. No. 5,005,642 discloses a logging tool centralizer that achieves a lower degree of variability of the centralizing force by moving the attachment points of the centralizing arms at the opposite side of the tool body. Thus, the angle between the centralizer arm and the tool body can never become zero, which is the condition that makes inoperable most other centralizing devices that rely only on axial actuation. The disadvantage of this approach is that it does not solve the problem completely, as the radial force still varies with the wellbore size. It also makes construction of the device difficult, especially when it is desirable to use more than two centralizing arms.
In all patents discussed above, the radial expansion of the centralizer is achieved by a mechanism that consists of two arms that are joined together at one of their ends and are attached to moving hubs at their other ends. When the distance between the hubs changes, the attachment point of the two arms moves in or out in the radial direction. Another approach to achieving a radially expandable device is based on the use of tapered surfaces or wedges. Centralizers built on this principle are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,348,091 and 5,934,378. A radially expandable well drilling tool is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,693,328. The principle of radial expansion is again based on moving parts sliding over inclined surfaces (wedges). The advantage of this concept is that the forces generated can be substantial. A major disadvantage is the relatively limited range of radial expansion.
The present invention overcomes the disadvantages of both types of radially expandable mechanisms discussed above by kinematically combining these mechanisms into a single device that accomplishes new and novel results in a manner that is different from either of the devices.
In one aspect of the present invention, a constant force actuator mechanism is provided that may be used with all known wellbore tractoring concepts to achieve a substantially constant radial force and, therefore, consistent traction in a very wide range of wellbore sizes.
In another aspect of the invention, a constant force actuator mechanism is provided that may be utilized either as a passive or as an active mechanism that is capable of producing a substantially constant radial force for application to opposed surfaces.
In a further aspect of the present invention, a constant force actuator mechanism is provided that may be effectively utilized as the operational component of a centralizer, a caliper, an anchoring device, a lifting jack, or other force transmitting devices, and may be energized by springs, hydraulic motors, pneumatic motors, mechanical energizing devices, and the like.
Briefly, the present invention is a mechanism that uses a force applied in a first linear direction to lift or support a load, or transmit a force, in a second linear direction that is substantially perpendicular to the first linear direction. Devices and mechanisms constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention are constructed in such manner that the force that is required to support the load is of practically constant magnitude and is independent of the position of the load in the second linear direction. In particular, the invention relates to logging tools or other devices for wells that are conveyed along the inside surfaces of a wellbore or a pipe, or between spaced surfaces. The invention can conveniently take the form of a centralizer, a caliper, an anchoring device, or a tractor mechanism for use in wells, or may take the form of a lifting or load supporting device when embodied in jacks and other lifting or load supporting devices. The function of the present invention is to apply or react radial forces against the internal cylindrical wall of a wellbore or circular conduit, such as a pipe, for centralizing objects within the wellbore or pipe, to provide an anchoring function, or to provide mechanical resistance enabling the efficient operation of internal traction devices for conveying objects such as logging tools. When used as a centralizer for logging tools, a plurality of radially movable actuating linkages embodying the present invention maintain the logging tools at the center of the wellbore and thus enhance the accuracy of the logging process. When used as a caliper, the invention extends arms or other linkages toward the wellbore wall and exerts a controlled radial force on the wall surface. When used as an anchoring device, the invention can apply or react radial forces that generate enough friction against a wellbore or pipe wall to prevent any sliding at the points of contact between the anchoring device and the wall surface of the wellbore or pipe. The latter is needed for the construction and operation of downhole tractor tools, which are often used to convey other tools along wells that have horizontal or highly deviated sections. A major advantage of the present invention is that the magnitudes of the radial forces that it applies to the wellbore wall are virtually constant and independent of the wellbore size.
The main elements of the invention are force transmitting members or hubs, wheels, axles, and at least a pair of linkage arms with built-in wedges or with guide surfaces of predetermined geometry defined by the linkage arms. For purposes of the present invention the terms “force transmitting members” or “hubs” are each intended to mean members of any desired configuration, that are relatively linearly movable, with one or both of the members movable and, if desired, one of the members stationary. The linkage arms, the force transmitting members or hubs, and the wheels are joined by the axles to form a linkage that can expand or contract radially as the distance between the hubs changes in the axial direction. The linkage arms are joined together by a pivot member or axle at one of their ends, which allows only angular motion of the linkage arms to occur. At their second ends, the linkage arms are attached to separate hubs by axles or pivots that can both rotate and slide within an elongate slot in the hub body. The wheels or rollers, which define movement control elements, are rotatably mounted onto the hubs and, when in contact with the guide surfaces of the linkage arms, roll on the force transmitting guide surfaces of wedges or guide surfaces that are built into the linkage arms, formed on the linkage arms, or attached to the linkage arms. Although wheels or rollers are shown as force transmitting elements of the hubs or force transmitting members, structures other than wheels or rollers may be employed within the spirit and scope of the present invention to transmit forces from the hubs to the guide surfaces of the wedges or linkage arms. The force transmitting guide surfaces are of predetermined geometry so as to react with the force transmitting surfaces of the wheels or rollers and develop resultant force vectors on the linkage arms that are angulated with respect to the direction of linear motion of one or both of the hubs. These angulated force vectors cause pivotal movement of the linkage arms even when the linkages are fully retracted. This feature permits ease of starting motion of the linkages from their retracted positions.
The invention combines two separate principles to generate the required radial expansion. At small angles between the arms and the hubs, the radial force is created by the wheels, which roll on the force transmitting surfaces of the wedges or linkage arms. At larger angles, the expansion movement of the linkages is created on the principle of a triangular three-bar linkage. A transition between the two principles occurs at a pre-selected intermediate angle of the linkage arms between the fully retracted and fully extended positions. By combining these two principles and by the selection, placement and shape of the force transmitting guide surfaces of the wedge members it is possible to achieve substantially constant input axial force, which is the major advantage of the present invention and which is distinct as compared with other similar devices.
The invention may be understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
Illustrative embodiments of the invention are described below. It will be appreciated that in the development of any such actual embodiment, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developer's specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which will vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it will be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time consuming but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking for those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure.
Referring now to
Now, imagine that the hubs 10 are displaced towards each other by axial forces designated by Fa in
Further radial expansion of linkage 25 based on the rolling of wheels 16 on guide surfaces 22 is shown in
The second kinematic principle on which the invention is based is illustrated in
Now imagine that a downward radial force Fr has acted through the whole expansion process. Also imagine that the magnitude of the axial force Fa that is necessary to overcome Fr and to continue the expansion has been recorded and represented graphically. An illustration of such a graphical representation is shown in FIG. 2. The exact magnitudes of the numbers and the shapes of the curves represented in
Various embodiments of the invention are discussed in more detail in
The linkage 25 used for the construction of various devices does not need to be symmetric. Two devices that are constructed with asymmetric linkages, which still operate on the principles disclosed above, are shown in
All embodiments of the invention discussed above represent tool string centralizers. Constant force centralizers can be achieved by means other than those discussed above. The present invention represents a new method by which such centralizers can be constructed.
The advantages of the invention, however, are far greater in devices that have the ability to selectively open and close their linkages in and out of the tool body. The reason is that such “active” devices usually have only axial linear actuators available for opening and closing the linkages into the tool as opposed to elements used in centralizers, which have a radial force component. Examples of devices that require selective opening and closing of linkages are calipers and downhole tractor tools. An embodiment of the invention used as a grip in a downhole tractor tool is shown in FIGS. 6 and 7A-7C.
As seen in
The basic elements of the invention, shown in
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that traction mechanisms other than cams can be combined with the invention. Thus, the invention can improve the operation of virtually every downhole tractor tool, independent of the principle upon which the traction of the tractor is generated. Examples of the usage of different traction devices in conjunction with the invention are schematically shown in
In all the embodiments discussed so far, the invention was combined with other mechanisms to construct various downhole tools to be operated in wells and pipelines. However, the invention is not limited to these embodiments. In general, the invention can improve the operation of any device that is designed to support a load in one direction by the application of a force in a second direction perpendicular to the first direction. Two such embodiments are shown in
Another embodiment of the invention that can be used to lift a load in one direction by the application of a force in a perpendicular direction is shown in FIG. 12. In
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and are herein described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the description herein of specific embodiments is not intended to limit the invention to the particular forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/364,189, filed Mar. 13, 2002, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4033187 | Nicolas | Jul 1977 | A |
4116274 | Rankin et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4184546 | Nicolas et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4926937 | Hademenos | May 1990 | A |
5758723 | Saucier et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5765640 | Milne et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5785125 | Royer | Jul 1998 | A |
6629568 | Post et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
20030183383 | Guerrero | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030188875 | Bloom et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1344893 | Sep 2003 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030173076 A1 | Sep 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60364189 | Mar 2002 | US |