Inverted constant force window balance systems include a housing or shoe coupled to a window sash that carries a coil spring having a free end secured to a window jamb channel with a mounting bracket, screw, or other element. As the coil spring unwinds, the recoil tendency of the spring produces an upward force to counter the weight of the window sash. The shoe may be a tilt-in shoe that allows the window sash to tilt inwards for cleaning and/or installation/removal purposes. As the window sash tilts, a locking mechanism holds the shoe in place to prevent the coil spring from retracting the shoe in the absence of the weight of the sash.
In one aspect, the technology relates to a window balance system having: a mounting bracket configured to be secured to a window jamb; a shoe body; a coil spring movably coupling the mounting bracket to the shoe body; an engagement member extending from at least one of the mounting bracket and the shoe body, wherein the engagement member includes at least one resilient arm having a pawl extending therefrom; and a receiving member defined in at least the other one of the mounting bracket and the shoe body, wherein the receiving member includes at least one rack having at least one tooth extending therefrom such that the pawl is engageable with the rack.
In an example, the mounting bracket and the shoe body define a longitudinal axis. In another example, the at least one resilient arm extends longitudinally from an end portion of the shoe body and the pawl includes an enlarged end of the at least one resilient arm. In yet another example, the engagement between the pawl and the rack deflects the resilient arm in a direction toward and away from the longitudinal axis. In still another example, the at least one rack is disposed at an angle in relation to the longitudinal axis. In another embodiment of the above aspect, the angle is within a range between and including 0° and 15°. In an example, the engagement member includes a first resilient arm and a second resilient arm, wherein each pawl faces in an opposite direction. In another example, the receiving member includes a first rack and a second rack, wherein each at least one tooth faces in an opposite direction. In yet another example, the shoe body includes a carrier configured to receive a curled portion of the coil spring. In still another example, the engagement member extends from the mounting bracket and the receiving member is defined in the shoe body. In another embodiment of the above aspect, the at least one rack includes a pair of facing toothed structures defining a channel therebetween, the channel configured to receive the pawl therein. In an example, the engagement member includes a body coupled to the shoe body.
In another aspect, the technology relates to a window balance system having: a shoe body including: an end portion; and a pair of resilient arms extending from the end portion, each resilient arm having a pawl extending therefrom; and a mounting bracket including a pair of racks, each rack having a plurality of teeth extending therefrom such that each pawl is engageable with the corresponding rack.
In an example, a coil spring is configured to couple the shoe body to the mounting bracket. In another example, the pair of racks are disposed on facing surfaces of the mounting bracket. In yet another example, the pawl includes an angled tooth extending away from an elongate axis of the resilient arm. In still another example, the angled tooth includes a leading angular face and a trailing angular face, the trailing angular face is configured to engage with the plurality of teeth. In another embodiment of the above aspect, the pawl is configured to engage with any one of the plurality of teeth.
In another aspect, the technology relates to a window balance system having: a shoe body; a mounting bracket; and a ratchet system configured to releasably couple the shoe body to the mounting bracket, the ratchet system having: at least one static receiving member; and at least one pawl configured to selectively engage with the at least one static receiving member via a resilient retaining force.
In an example, the at least one pawl extends from a resilient arm coupled to at least one of the shoe body and the mounting bracket, the resilient arm configured to induce the resilient retaining force. In another example, the ratchet system further includes a pair of resilient arms. In yet another example, the at least one pawl extends from the pair of resilient arms in different directions. In still another example, the at least one static receiving member includes a pair of dog bone members, the pair of dog bone members defined in at least one of the shoe body and the mounting bracket.
In another aspect, the technology relates to a window balance system having: a shoe body including at least one static receiving member extending therefrom; an engagement member configured to couple to the shoe body via the at least one static receiving member, the engagement member includes a pair of resilient arms extending therefrom, each resilient arm having a pawl extending from a free end of the resilient arm; and a mounting bracket including a pair of racks, each rack having a plurality of teeth extending therefrom such that each pawl is engageable with the corresponding rack.
In an example, the at least one static receiving member includes a pair of dog bone members. In another example, the engagement member further includes a pair of recesses that correspond to the pair of dog bone members. In yet another example, the engagement member is removably coupled to the shoe body.
There are shown in the drawings embodiments that are presently preferred, it being understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and configurations shown.
The technologies described herein facilitate a spring coil of a constant force window balance system to be held close to a mounting bracket when mounted in a window frame, when a window sash is in a raised position. For example, a ratchet system or engagement mechanism is defined in the window balance system so as to releasably engage a shoe body with the mounting bracket. As such, when the window sash is in a raised position the window sash load is at least partially transferred from the spring coil to the ratchet system and restricts the window sash from lowering. Moreover, the ratchet system further facilitates forming a more secure coupling between the shoe body and the mounting bracket during shipping and window assembly, thereby reducing undesirable wear to the system before operation within the window. For example, the ratchet system includes a toothed interface between the stationary mounting bracket and the shoe body (e.g., an upper portion thereof) so as to provide sash support over a wide range of sash travel. The ratchet system also serves as a sash travel stop, thus preventing the sash from being raised too high in the window frame which, in an extreme example, can cause undesirable impact between a frame header and a lock positioned on an upper portion of the window sash, potentially inducing wear to a header. In a more specific example, the technology includes dual opposing lock fingers or resilient arms included on the shoe body and having a pawl or a tooth extending therefrom. The pawl engages the dual opposing racks having a plurality of teeth extending therefrom and defined in the mounting bracket, such that the shoe body is releasably engaged with the mounting bracket.
The shoe body 12 may define a longitudinal groove 28 that receives and permits passage of a pivot bar from a window sash (both not shown). Some known inverted constant force balances often require that the sash frame or jamb be spread apart in order to load the sash into the shoes on either side of the frame. This may make the sash insertion more difficult during manufacture as well as in the field. With the depicted balance, however, the shoe may have a grooved lead-in that allows “drop in” of the pivot bar during sash installation. This may facilitate faster installation and removal of the window sash in both a production environment and in the field. The groove 28 may be open at the bottom proximate a cam 30 that is located within the enlarged portion 24 of the shoe 12. The cam 30 may include a keyhole opening 32 for receipt of the pivot bar, when the keyhole opening 32 is rotationally aligned with the groove 28. During installation of the sash, the pivot bar may slide from the groove 28 directly into the keyhole opening 32 and in the cam 30. The coil spring 14 may be carried in a carrier section 34 positioned near an upper portion 36 of the elongate portion 18 of the shoe body 12. A free end 38 of the coil spring 14 may be secured to the mounting bracket 16 that is securable to a window jamb channel with a screw or other element (not shown). Alternatively, the free end 38 may be secured directly to the jamb channel.
A sweep 42, manufactured of pile, foam, or other low-friction material may be installed on either side of the elongate portion 18 such that the sweep 42 projects beyond the side wall 20 of the elongate portion 18 and positioned adjacent to the coil spring 14. Dirt and debris (e.g., gypsum dust, sawdust, sand, etc.) are common in construction and can reduce operability of the coil spring 14. The sweep 42 may wipe the coil spring 14 during each sash opening and closing cycle along the parallel sides of the jamb track, thus reducing dirt and debris from being drawn into the coil spring 14, which can result in undesirable friction and operational problems.
Additionally, one or more posts 44, for example two posts 44, extend from a top side 45 of the elongate portion 18. These posts 44 engage with corresponding recesses 46 defined in the mounting bracket 16 to couple mounting bracket 16 to shoe body 12, and remain engaged during shipping and/or window assembly, prior to mounting of the window sash. The engagement between the posts 44 and the recesses 46 holds together the window balance system 10, for example, coupling the mounting bracket 16 to the shoe body 12, so as to avoid and reduce inadvertent disengagement during shipping and/or window assembly. However, some known window balance systems, for example the system 10, are roughly handled during shipping and/or window assembly such that the posts 44 may become disengaged from the recesses 46 and the mounting bracket 16 is decoupled from the shoe body 12. This decoupling may increase undesirable wear to the window balance system 10, thus undesirably frustrating the window assembly process.
During operation of the window balance system 10, the coil spring 14 forms a curve 48 of coil spring material between the coil spring 14 and the mounting bracket 16, as shown in
The constant force balance system 10 requires the coil spring 14 to be extended a certain distance in order to provide enough lift to meet its specified weight capacity. For example, this distance may be about one inch. Thus, if a lower sash of a hung window is opened to its fullest extent and released, it may drop by about one inch until the coil spring 14 offers sufficient resistance to the load of the window sash. This limits the sash opening and the ability to meet safety egress with some known window sizes. For example, the drop of the window sash, induced by the window balance system 10, may limit the total amount of egress area available, thus preventing the window from being rated to a proper egress standard. Some known windows require a clear projected open area for egress is about 5.7 square feet, with the vertical opening being no less than 20 inches and the horizontal opening being no less than 24 inches. As such, some known window balance systems induce the window to drop unexpectedly upon opening to its fullest extent and potentially impeding the egress of a person as they try to pass through the window.
The shoe body 106 is coupled to the mounting bracket 110 via the coil spring 108. More specifically, a free end 128 of the coil spring 108 is engaged with the mounting bracket 110. As such, the curled portion 126 provides a retraction force along the longitudinal axis 120 for the shoe body 106 and the connected window sash in relation to the mounting bracket 110 and the free end 128. The mounting bracket 110 may be secured to a jamb channel (not shown) of a window frame with screws, bolts, or other mechanical or chemical fasteners (adhesives).
Additionally, window balance system 100 also includes an engagement mechanism/ratchet system 130 defined and/or formed on at least one of the shoe body 106 and the mounting bracket 110. The ratchet system 130 enables the shoe body 106 to be releasably coupled to the mounting bracket 110 in a plurality of predetermined positions. The ratchet system 130 includes an engagement member 132 and a receiving member 134. The engagement member 132 extends from an end portion 136 of the shoe body 106 along the longitudinal axis 120. The engagement member 132 includes at least one resilient arm, for example, a first and a second resilient arm 138 and 140, respectively. Each resilient arm 138 and 140 has a pawl 142 and 144 extending therefrom and disposed at a free end that facilitates engagement with the receiving member 134. For example, each pawl 142 and 144 defines an enlarged end of the resilient arms 138 and 140, respectively. More specifically, each pawl 142 and 144 includes an angled tooth 146 that extends away from an elongate axis of the resilient arms 138 and 140. The angled tooth 146 may include a leading angular face 148 that enables engagement with the receiving member 134, and also may include a relatively steeper trailing angular face 150 that enables the engagement with the receiving member 134 to be maintained. As such, the shoe body 106 is positioned adjacent to the mounting bracket 110 when the engagement member 132 is engaged with the receiving member 134.
The receiving member 134 is defined on facing surfaces of the mounting bracket 110 and includes at least one linear serration element/rack, for example, a first and a second rack 152 and 154. Each rack 152 and 154 has a plurality of teeth 156 and 158 extending therefrom and along a longitudinal length of the racks 152 and 154. For example, each rack 152 and 154 with teeth 156 and 158 corresponds to each resilient arm 138 and 140 with pawls 142 and 144, such that pawls 142 and 144 are engageable with racks 152 and 154. As shown in
Furthermore, in some examples, the window balance system 100 may include at least one projection 160 extending from the end portion 136 of the shoe body 106 and at least one corresponding recess 162 defined within the mounting bracket 110. The projections 160 are engageable with the recesses 162 as described above in reference to
In operation, the window balance system 100 is installed into a window frame (not shown). More specifically, the mounting bracket 110 is mounted to a window jamb, while the shoe body 106 is mounted to a window sash. When the window sash is in a closed or partially closed position the window balance system 100 is in the disengaged position 102 as shown in
As the window sash is raised into a fully-opened position, the engagement member 132 is received by the receiving member 134 to releasable couple the shoe body 106 to the mounting bracket 110. By coupling the shoe body 106 to the mounting bracket 110, via the ratchet system 130, the weight of the window sash is at least partially supported by the window balance system 100 such that the window sash is held in the fully-opened position. When the engagement member 132 is received by the receiving member 134, the leading angular face 148 of each pawl 142 and 144 deflects the resilient arm 138 and 140 such that the pawls 142 and 144 pass around each tooth 156 and 158 and the trailing angular face 150 engages and disengages with the individual teeth 156 and 158. Resilient arms 138 and 140 may deflect, for example, flex, without being permanently deformed. The deflection of the resilient arms 138 and 140 may be in a direction towards and away from the longitudinal axis 120.
The trailing angular face 150 may engage with any one of the plurality of teeth 156 and 158 along racks 152 and 154. For example, the pawls 142 and 144 may engage at a first tooth on racks 152 and 154, or the pawls 142 and 144 may engage at a last tooth on racks 152 and 154. While is still other examples, more than one pawl 142 and 144 may extend from each resilient arm 138 and 140 such that more than one tooth on a single rack may be engaged.
When the engagement member 132 is engaged with the receiving member 134, the engagement enables the ratchet system 130 to support at least a portion of the weight of the window sash. As such, when the window sash is raised to the fully-opened position, the coil spring 108 is not required to be in an extended position and may take on a curved configuration, for example the curve 48 (shown in
Also, the ratchet system 130 serves as a sash travel stop, thus preventing the window sash from being raised too high in the window frame which may cause undesirable impact between a frame header and a lock positioned on an upper portion of the window sash and inducing wear to the header. Moreover, the balance window system 100 may be shipped and installed in the engaged position 104, depicted in
In the example of
During operation of the window balance system 200, the shoe body 106 and the mounting bracket 110 are enabled to be movably positioned in relation to one another along the longitudinal axis 120 as described above in further detail. When engaging the engagement member 206 with the receiving member 210 such that the window balance system 200 is in an engaged position (not shown), resilient arms 208 and 212 deflect during engagement with the racks 214 and 216, respectively. In other examples, the arms are fixed and/or static and each tooth is resilient, as such each tooth may deflect when engaged and disengaged with the corresponding static pawl and induce the retaining force within the ratchet system. In yet further contemplated examples, opposite and/or both sets of teeth and arms/pawls may be resilient and deflect thus inducing the retaining force within the ratchet system.
The window balance system 300 also includes a ratchet system 308. For example, ratchet system 308 includes an engagement member 310 having a resilient arm 312 extending from the shoe body 106 and a pawl 314 positioned at a free end. Ratchet system 308 also includes a receiving member 316 having a rack 318 defined therein and a plurality of teeth 320 extending therefrom. In the depicted example, a single resilient arm 312 is engageable with the rack 318. In alternative examples, multiple arms and racks may be included as described in the previous examples. Additionally, the arm 312 and the rack 318 may be disposed on either side of the longitudinal axis 120 and with the pawl 314 and the teeth 320 facing in any direction that enables the ratchet system 308 to function as described herein.
During operation of the window balance system 300, the shoe body 106 and the mounting bracket 110 are enabled to be movably positioned in relation to one another along the longitudinal axis 120 as described above in further detail. When engaging the engagement member 310 with the receiving member 316, the resilient arms 312 deflect during engagement with the rack 318. While in the engaged position 304, the ratchet system 308 enables the window sash to be held in the fully-opened position when installed within the window, and also facilitates maintaining the shoe body 106 in contact with the mounting bracket 110 during shipping and window assembly.
In operation, by pitching the racks 404 and 406, a retention force between the resilient arms (not shown) and an associated tooth of the rack 404 and 406 increases as each tooth extends farther up the rack 404 and 406 (e.g., towards a top of the mounting bracket 400), and forming a variable force ratchet system within the window balance system. In alternative examples, each rack 404 and 406 may be formed on the shoe body (not shown) as depicted in
In operation, the pawls 616 selectively engage and disengage with the static receiving members 612 via a resilient retaining force 620. More specifically, when the mounting bracket 608 is received by the shoe body 604, each pawl 616 deflects the resilient arm 618 from an original position around the static receiving members 612 such that each pawl 616 engages with its associated inner surface 615. The resilient arms 618 may deflect or flex from the original position without being permanently deformed. In the engaged position 602, deflection of the resilient arms 618 induce the retaining force 620 that is normal to the longitudinal axis 120 such that the pawls 616 are engaged with the static receiving members 612. When in the engaged position 602, the ratchet system 610 enables the mounting bracket 608 to be coupled to the shoe body 604. This coupling prevents undesirable separation between the mounting bracket 608 and the shoe body 604 during shipping and window assembly of the window balance system 600. Furthermore, when the window sash is raised to the fully-opened position, the ratchet system 610 may further support the weight of the window sash to reduce window sash drop. The ratchet system 610 further enables the pawls 616 to disengage with the static receiving members 612 upon a disengagement force being induced along the longitudinal axis 120. The disengagement force is sufficient to overcome the retaining force 620 that engages the pawls 616 with the static support members 612 so as to defect the resilient arms 618.
In operation, the engagement member body 716 is removably coupled to the shoe body 704 such that the ratchet system 710 is formed on the window balance system 700 and the shoe body 704 may be releasably coupled to the mounting bracket 710, as described in detail above. As such, when in an engaged position, the ratchet system 710 enables the mounting bracket 708 to be coupled to the shoe body 704 via the engagement member body 716 to prevent undesirable separation between the mounting bracket 708 and the shoe body 704 during shipping and window assembly of the window balance system 700. Furthermore, when the window sash is raised to the fully-opened position, the ratchet system 710 may further support the weight of the window sash to reduce window sash drop in a fully-open position.
The materials utilized in the engagement systems described herein may be those typically utilized for window and window component manufacture. Material selection for most of the components may be based on the proposed use of the window. Appropriate materials may be selected for the sash retention systems used on particularly heavy window panels, as well as on windows subject to certain environmental conditions (e.g., moisture, corrosive atmospheres, etc.). Aluminum, steel, stainless steel, or composite materials can be utilized. Bendable and/or moldable plastics may be particularly useful. For example, the shoe body and/or the mounting bracket may be unitarily formed with the engagement member and/or the receiving member. While in other examples, the engagement member and/or receiving member may couple to the shoe body and/or mounting bracket as an accessory for the window balance system.
While there have been described herein what are to be considered exemplary and preferred examples of the present technology, other modifications of the technology will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the teachings herein. The particular methods of manufacture and geometries disclosed herein are exemplary in nature and are not to be considered limiting. It is therefore desired to be secured in the appended claims all such modifications as fall within the spirit and scope of the technology. Accordingly, what is desired to be secured by Letters Patent is the technology as defined and differentiated in the following claims, and all equivalents.
This application claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/258,216, filed on Nov. 20, 2015, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
698168 | Barnum | Apr 1902 | A |
887968 | Selkirk | May 1908 | A |
1007212 | Lasersohn | Oct 1911 | A |
1312665 | Almquist | Aug 1919 | A |
1420503 | Throne | Jun 1922 | A |
1480453 | Lane | Jan 1924 | A |
2069025 | Anderson | Jan 1937 | A |
2178533 | Viehweger | Oct 1939 | A |
2209293 | Cannon | Jul 1940 | A |
2602958 | Brown | Jul 1952 | A |
2609191 | Foster | Sep 1952 | A |
2609193 | Foster | Sep 1952 | A |
2622267 | Peremi | Dec 1952 | A |
2635282 | Trammell, Sr. et al. | Apr 1953 | A |
2644193 | Anderberg | Jul 1953 | A |
2684499 | Lewis | Jul 1954 | A |
2732594 | Adams et al. | Jan 1956 | A |
2739344 | Dickinson | Mar 1956 | A |
2766492 | Day | Oct 1956 | A |
2807045 | Chenoweth | Sep 1957 | A |
2817872 | Foster | Dec 1957 | A |
2851721 | Decker et al. | Sep 1958 | A |
2873472 | Foster | Feb 1959 | A |
2952884 | Dinsmore | Sep 1960 | A |
3007194 | Griswold | Nov 1961 | A |
3105576 | Jones et al. | Oct 1963 | A |
3150420 | Brenner | Sep 1964 | A |
3184784 | Peters | May 1965 | A |
3364622 | Collard | Jan 1968 | A |
3434236 | Weidner et al. | Mar 1969 | A |
3445964 | Foster | May 1969 | A |
3452480 | Foster | Jul 1969 | A |
3461608 | Johnson | Aug 1969 | A |
3475865 | Arnes | Nov 1969 | A |
3497999 | Hendra | Mar 1970 | A |
3529381 | Grossman | Sep 1970 | A |
3676956 | Taylor et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
3732594 | Mills | May 1973 | A |
3820193 | Foster | Jun 1974 | A |
3844066 | Nobes | Oct 1974 | A |
3869754 | Foster | Mar 1975 | A |
3992751 | Foster et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4028849 | Anderson | Jun 1977 | A |
4068406 | Wood | Jan 1978 | A |
4079549 | Wood | Mar 1978 | A |
4089085 | Fitzgibbon | May 1978 | A |
4190930 | Prosser | Mar 1980 | A |
4227345 | Durham, Jr. | Oct 1980 | A |
4228620 | Hutchins | Oct 1980 | A |
4300316 | Ficurilli | Nov 1981 | A |
4332054 | Paist et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4364199 | Johnson et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4446654 | Schoolman et al. | May 1984 | A |
4452012 | Deal | Jun 1984 | A |
4506478 | Anderson | Mar 1985 | A |
4510713 | Anderson | Apr 1985 | A |
4517766 | Haltof | May 1985 | A |
4555868 | Mancuso | Dec 1985 | A |
4570382 | Suess | Feb 1986 | A |
4571887 | Haltof | Feb 1986 | A |
4590708 | Campodonico | May 1986 | A |
4610108 | Marshik | Sep 1986 | A |
4642845 | Marshik | Feb 1987 | A |
4683676 | Sterner, Jr. | Aug 1987 | A |
4689850 | Flight | Sep 1987 | A |
4697304 | Overgard | Oct 1987 | A |
4704821 | Berndt | Nov 1987 | A |
4718194 | FitzGibbon et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4785581 | Abramson et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4799333 | Westfall et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4837976 | Westfall et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4854077 | Rogers et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4885871 | Westfall et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4888915 | Goldenberg | Dec 1989 | A |
4914861 | May | Apr 1990 | A |
4922657 | Foss | May 1990 | A |
4930254 | Valentin | Jun 1990 | A |
4935987 | Sterner, Jr. | Jun 1990 | A |
4941285 | Westfall | Jul 1990 | A |
4949425 | Dodson et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4953258 | Mennuto | Sep 1990 | A |
4958462 | Cross | Sep 1990 | A |
4961247 | Leitzel et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5035081 | Yamamoto et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5036621 | Iwasaki | Aug 1991 | A |
5069001 | Makarowski | Dec 1991 | A |
5113922 | Christensen et al. | May 1992 | A |
5119591 | Sterner, Jr. et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5119592 | Westfall et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5127192 | Cross | Jul 1992 | A |
5140769 | Hickson et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5157808 | Sterner, Jr. | Oct 1992 | A |
5189838 | Westfall | Mar 1993 | A |
5210976 | Cripps | May 1993 | A |
5232208 | Braid et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5251401 | Prete et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5301467 | Schmidt et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5353548 | Westfall | Oct 1994 | A |
5365638 | Braid et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5371971 | Prete | Dec 1994 | A |
5377384 | Riegelman | Jan 1995 | A |
5383303 | Nakanishi et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
D355262 | Chaney et al. | Feb 1995 | S |
5440837 | Piltingsrud | Aug 1995 | A |
5445364 | Tibbals, Jr. | Aug 1995 | A |
5448858 | Briggs et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5452495 | Briggs | Sep 1995 | A |
5463793 | Westfall | Nov 1995 | A |
5463795 | Carlson et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5530991 | deNormand et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5544450 | Schmidt et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5553903 | Prete et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5566507 | Schmidt et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5572828 | Westfall | Nov 1996 | A |
5615452 | Habbersett | Apr 1997 | A |
5632117 | Prete et al. | May 1997 | A |
5632118 | Stark | May 1997 | A |
5661927 | Polowinczak et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5669180 | Maier | Sep 1997 | A |
5697188 | Fullick et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5699636 | Stark | Dec 1997 | A |
5704165 | Slocomb et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5737877 | Meunier et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5802767 | Slocomb et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5806243 | Prete et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5806900 | Bratcher et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5829196 | Maier | Nov 1998 | A |
5852854 | Pierrot et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855092 | Raap et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5873199 | Meunier et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5924243 | Polowinczak et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5927013 | Slocomb et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5943822 | Slocomb et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5996283 | Maier | Dec 1999 | A |
6032417 | Jakus et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041475 | Nidelkoff | Mar 2000 | A |
6041476 | deNormand | Mar 2000 | A |
6041550 | Tix | Mar 2000 | A |
6058653 | Slocomb et al. | May 2000 | A |
6119398 | Yates, Jr. | Sep 2000 | A |
D434637 | Habeck et al. | Dec 2000 | S |
6155615 | Schultz | Dec 2000 | A |
6161335 | Beard et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6161657 | Zhuang | Dec 2000 | A |
6178696 | Liang | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6226923 | Hicks et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6305126 | Hendrickson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6378169 | Batten et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6393661 | Braid et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
D462258 | Meunier | Sep 2002 | S |
D464256 | Meunier | Oct 2002 | S |
6467128 | Damani | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470530 | Trunkle | Oct 2002 | B1 |
D467490 | Uken et al. | Dec 2002 | S |
6553620 | Guillemet et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6584644 | Braid et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6606761 | Braid et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6622342 | Annes et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6679000 | Uken et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6763550 | Regnier | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6820368 | Uken et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6840011 | Thompson et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6848148 | Braid et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6857228 | Kunz et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6860066 | Kunz et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6931788 | Uken et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6983513 | Pettit | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6990710 | Kunz et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7076835 | Harold et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7143475 | Annes et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7191562 | Uken et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7552510 | Harold et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7587787 | Pettit | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7673372 | Annes et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7703175 | Tuller | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7735191 | Tuller | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7937809 | Tuller | May 2011 | B2 |
7945994 | Dallas et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7966770 | Kunz | Jun 2011 | B1 |
8074402 | Tuller | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8132290 | Liang et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8181396 | Kunz | May 2012 | B1 |
8313310 | Uchikado | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8365356 | Robertson | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8371068 | Kunz | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8424248 | Uken et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8505242 | Kunz | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8539642 | Baker | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8561260 | Baker | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8640383 | Kunz | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8813310 | Baker et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8819896 | Kellum, III et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8850745 | Sofianek et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8918979 | Baker | Dec 2014 | B2 |
RE45328 | Tuller | Jan 2015 | E |
8966822 | Sofianek et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9003710 | Kellum, III et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9121209 | Baker et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9133656 | Steen et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9458655 | deNormand | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9580950 | Uken et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
10208517 | Lucci | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10344514 | Uken | Jul 2019 | B2 |
20020053117 | Braid et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020092241 | Uken et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020104189 | Braid et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020129463 | Newman | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030074764 | Pettit et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030192147 | Braid et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030192257 | Uken et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030213096 | Annes et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040006845 | Polowinczak et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040163209 | Pettit | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040216380 | Uken et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040237256 | Lutfallah | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040244158 | Awakura et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040244295 | Derham | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050055802 | Braid et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050178068 | Uken et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050198775 | Pettit et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050229492 | Robertson | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060086052 | Petta et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060207185 | Shuler et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070011846 | Braid et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070101654 | Robertson | May 2007 | A1 |
20070113479 | Uken et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080047099 | Malek | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080120804 | Annes et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080178424 | Tuller | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080178425 | Tuler | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090188075 | Baker | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090260295 | Tuller | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100115854 | Uken et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20110067314 | Baker | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110239402 | Steen et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120297687 | Baker et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130283699 | Kellum, III et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130340349 | Baker | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140000172 | Sofianek | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140026490 | Baker et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140208653 | Sofianek et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140208655 | Stoakes et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140259524 | Kellum, III | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140259936 | DeNormand et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140331561 | Baker et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150167379 | Sofianek et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150361701 | Steen | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150368952 | Baker et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160222709 | Wynder | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160298368 | Kunz | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160298369 | Kunz | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170089109 | Steen et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170211305 | Uken et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170370138 | Uken et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180291660 | Kellum | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20190085609 | Kellum | Mar 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1155341 | Oct 1983 | CA |
2119506 | Oct 1994 | CA |
2382933 | Apr 2002 | CA |
2338403 | Apr 2006 | CA |
2596293 | Feb 2008 | CA |
2619267 | Jul 2008 | CA |
2619289 | Jul 2008 | CA |
2820240 | Jan 2014 | CA |
2836375 | Jul 2014 | CA |
4211695 | Oct 1992 | DE |
329996 | May 1930 | GB |
723056 | Feb 1955 | GB |
740223 | Nov 1955 | GB |
1505782 | Mar 1978 | GB |
2195691 | Apr 1988 | GB |
2236786 | Apr 1991 | GB |
2254875 | Oct 1992 | GB |
2276655 | Oct 1994 | GB |
2278626 | Dec 1994 | GB |
2280697 | Feb 1995 | GB |
2292168 | Feb 1996 | GB |
2295634 | Jun 1996 | GB |
56-171982 | Jan 1981 | JP |
03197785 | Aug 1991 | JP |
5-52273 | Jul 1993 | JP |
3025244 | Jun 1996 | JP |
63-3785 | Jan 1998 | JP |
2000283025 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2004293388 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2005113907 | Apr 2005 | JP |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application PCT/US2018/026500, dated Jun. 22, 2018, 13 pages. |
“Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 9,133,656 Pursuant to 37 CFR 1.510 et seq”, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/081,089, entitled Inverted Constant Force Window Balance for Tilt Sash, filed Feb. 26, 2016, 19 pgs. |
Balance Systems—BSI Amesbury Group, Inc. Crossbow Balance Advertisement dated Jun. 7, 1999 (3 pgs.). |
BSI Tilt Balance Systems, Balance Systems—BSI, Amesbury Group, Inc., 1996-2001, 4 pgs. |
BSI's Hidden Advantage: It's as Easy as 1-2-3, Balance Systems—BSI, Amesbury Group, Inc., 2001, 3 pgs. |
Response by Patent Owner to Office Action in Ex-Parte Re-Examination Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 1.550(e) for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 90/013,695, filed Aug. 23, 2016, 13 pages. |
Crossbow Balance! Another New Balance in BSI's Quiver, Balance Systems—BSI, Amesbury Group, Inc., Jun. 7, 1999, 2 pgs. |
Dakota Balance—Balances and Accessories Brochure, May 2001, 2 pgs. |
DWM Door & Window Maker Magazine, “2004 Annual Buyers Guide”, vol. 5, Issue 3, Apr. 2004, 2 pgs. |
Ex-Parte Re-Examination Office Action for corresponding Re-Examination U.S. Appl. No. 90/013,695 dated Jun. 23, 2016, 8 pgs. |
Heinberg, “Latest Trends in Window and Door Hardware,” Shelter Magazine, Jul. 2001, cover and p. 11. |
PCT International Search Report, Written Opinion, and International Preliminary Report on Patentability (with 37 sheets of annexes) for PCT/US2011/024134; ISA/US, dated Feb. 9, 2011 (113 pages total). |
Photographs of the Crossbow Balance Component shown in C6 (7 views; 3 pgs). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170145722 A1 | May 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62258216 | Nov 2015 | US |