Constant force window balance engagement system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10563441
  • Patent Number
    10,563,441
  • Date Filed
    Friday, November 18, 2016
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 18, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
A window balance system includes a mounting bracket configured to be secured to a window jamb, a shoe body and a coil spring movably coupling the mounting bracket to the shoe body. The window balance system also includes an engagement member extending from at least one of the mounting bracket and the shoe body, wherein the engagement member includes at least one resilient arm having a pawl extending therefrom. The window balance system further includes a receiving member defined in at least the other one of the mounting bracket and the shoe body, wherein the receiving member includes at least one rack having at least one tooth extending therefrom such that the pawl is engageable with the rack.
Description
INTRODUCTION

Inverted constant force window balance systems include a housing or shoe coupled to a window sash that carries a coil spring having a free end secured to a window jamb channel with a mounting bracket, screw, or other element. As the coil spring unwinds, the recoil tendency of the spring produces an upward force to counter the weight of the window sash. The shoe may be a tilt-in shoe that allows the window sash to tilt inwards for cleaning and/or installation/removal purposes. As the window sash tilts, a locking mechanism holds the shoe in place to prevent the coil spring from retracting the shoe in the absence of the weight of the sash.


SUMMARY

In one aspect, the technology relates to a window balance system having: a mounting bracket configured to be secured to a window jamb; a shoe body; a coil spring movably coupling the mounting bracket to the shoe body; an engagement member extending from at least one of the mounting bracket and the shoe body, wherein the engagement member includes at least one resilient arm having a pawl extending therefrom; and a receiving member defined in at least the other one of the mounting bracket and the shoe body, wherein the receiving member includes at least one rack having at least one tooth extending therefrom such that the pawl is engageable with the rack.


In an example, the mounting bracket and the shoe body define a longitudinal axis. In another example, the at least one resilient arm extends longitudinally from an end portion of the shoe body and the pawl includes an enlarged end of the at least one resilient arm. In yet another example, the engagement between the pawl and the rack deflects the resilient arm in a direction toward and away from the longitudinal axis. In still another example, the at least one rack is disposed at an angle in relation to the longitudinal axis. In another embodiment of the above aspect, the angle is within a range between and including 0° and 15°. In an example, the engagement member includes a first resilient arm and a second resilient arm, wherein each pawl faces in an opposite direction. In another example, the receiving member includes a first rack and a second rack, wherein each at least one tooth faces in an opposite direction. In yet another example, the shoe body includes a carrier configured to receive a curled portion of the coil spring. In still another example, the engagement member extends from the mounting bracket and the receiving member is defined in the shoe body. In another embodiment of the above aspect, the at least one rack includes a pair of facing toothed structures defining a channel therebetween, the channel configured to receive the pawl therein. In an example, the engagement member includes a body coupled to the shoe body.


In another aspect, the technology relates to a window balance system having: a shoe body including: an end portion; and a pair of resilient arms extending from the end portion, each resilient arm having a pawl extending therefrom; and a mounting bracket including a pair of racks, each rack having a plurality of teeth extending therefrom such that each pawl is engageable with the corresponding rack.


In an example, a coil spring is configured to couple the shoe body to the mounting bracket. In another example, the pair of racks are disposed on facing surfaces of the mounting bracket. In yet another example, the pawl includes an angled tooth extending away from an elongate axis of the resilient arm. In still another example, the angled tooth includes a leading angular face and a trailing angular face, the trailing angular face is configured to engage with the plurality of teeth. In another embodiment of the above aspect, the pawl is configured to engage with any one of the plurality of teeth.


In another aspect, the technology relates to a window balance system having: a shoe body; a mounting bracket; and a ratchet system configured to releasably couple the shoe body to the mounting bracket, the ratchet system having: at least one static receiving member; and at least one pawl configured to selectively engage with the at least one static receiving member via a resilient retaining force.


In an example, the at least one pawl extends from a resilient arm coupled to at least one of the shoe body and the mounting bracket, the resilient arm configured to induce the resilient retaining force. In another example, the ratchet system further includes a pair of resilient arms. In yet another example, the at least one pawl extends from the pair of resilient arms in different directions. In still another example, the at least one static receiving member includes a pair of dog bone members, the pair of dog bone members defined in at least one of the shoe body and the mounting bracket.


In another aspect, the technology relates to a window balance system having: a shoe body including at least one static receiving member extending therefrom; an engagement member configured to couple to the shoe body via the at least one static receiving member, the engagement member includes a pair of resilient arms extending therefrom, each resilient arm having a pawl extending from a free end of the resilient arm; and a mounting bracket including a pair of racks, each rack having a plurality of teeth extending therefrom such that each pawl is engageable with the corresponding rack.


In an example, the at least one static receiving member includes a pair of dog bone members. In another example, the engagement member further includes a pair of recesses that correspond to the pair of dog bone members. In yet another example, the engagement member is removably coupled to the shoe body.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

There are shown in the drawings embodiments that are presently preferred, it being understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and configurations shown.



FIG. 1 is a front view of a prior art inverted constant force window balance system.



FIGS. 2A and 2B are front perspective views of an example of an inverted constant force window balance system, in a disengaged and an engaged position, respectively.



FIG. 3 is a partial front view of another inverted constant force window balance system, in a disengaged position.



FIGS. 4A and 4B are front views of an example of a constant force window balance system, in a disengaged and an engaged position, respectively.



FIG. 5 is an enlarged view of an example of a mounting bracket.



FIG. 6 is an enlarged view of another mounting bracket.



FIG. 7 is a front view of another inverted constant force window balance system in an engaged position.



FIG. 8 is a front view of another inverted constant force window balance system in a disengaged position.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The technologies described herein facilitate a spring coil of a constant force window balance system to be held close to a mounting bracket when mounted in a window frame, when a window sash is in a raised position. For example, a ratchet system or engagement mechanism is defined in the window balance system so as to releasably engage a shoe body with the mounting bracket. As such, when the window sash is in a raised position the window sash load is at least partially transferred from the spring coil to the ratchet system and restricts the window sash from lowering. Moreover, the ratchet system further facilitates forming a more secure coupling between the shoe body and the mounting bracket during shipping and window assembly, thereby reducing undesirable wear to the system before operation within the window. For example, the ratchet system includes a toothed interface between the stationary mounting bracket and the shoe body (e.g., an upper portion thereof) so as to provide sash support over a wide range of sash travel. The ratchet system also serves as a sash travel stop, thus preventing the sash from being raised too high in the window frame which, in an extreme example, can cause undesirable impact between a frame header and a lock positioned on an upper portion of the window sash, potentially inducing wear to a header. In a more specific example, the technology includes dual opposing lock fingers or resilient arms included on the shoe body and having a pawl or a tooth extending therefrom. The pawl engages the dual opposing racks having a plurality of teeth extending therefrom and defined in the mounting bracket, such that the shoe body is releasably engaged with the mounting bracket.



FIG. 1 is a front view of a prior art window balance system 10, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,133,656, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. Elements of the window balance system 10 include a shoe body 12, a coil spring 14, and a mounting bracket 16. The shoe body 12 may incorporate a generally T-shaped configuration that is similar in certain aspects to a balance shoe described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,679,000, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. The T-shaped shoe configuration may utilize an elongate portion 18 having two side walls 20 defining an elongate portion width X therebetween. Two opposing projections 22 may extend beyond the side walls 20 of the elongate portion 18 and form an enlarged portion 24 at a distal end 25 of the shoe body 12. The projections 22 may each include a projection side wall 26 that define an enlarged portion width Y therebetween.


The shoe body 12 may define a longitudinal groove 28 that receives and permits passage of a pivot bar from a window sash (both not shown). Some known inverted constant force balances often require that the sash frame or jamb be spread apart in order to load the sash into the shoes on either side of the frame. This may make the sash insertion more difficult during manufacture as well as in the field. With the depicted balance, however, the shoe may have a grooved lead-in that allows “drop in” of the pivot bar during sash installation. This may facilitate faster installation and removal of the window sash in both a production environment and in the field. The groove 28 may be open at the bottom proximate a cam 30 that is located within the enlarged portion 24 of the shoe 12. The cam 30 may include a keyhole opening 32 for receipt of the pivot bar, when the keyhole opening 32 is rotationally aligned with the groove 28. During installation of the sash, the pivot bar may slide from the groove 28 directly into the keyhole opening 32 and in the cam 30. The coil spring 14 may be carried in a carrier section 34 positioned near an upper portion 36 of the elongate portion 18 of the shoe body 12. A free end 38 of the coil spring 14 may be secured to the mounting bracket 16 that is securable to a window jamb channel with a screw or other element (not shown). Alternatively, the free end 38 may be secured directly to the jamb channel.


A sweep 42, manufactured of pile, foam, or other low-friction material may be installed on either side of the elongate portion 18 such that the sweep 42 projects beyond the side wall 20 of the elongate portion 18 and positioned adjacent to the coil spring 14. Dirt and debris (e.g., gypsum dust, sawdust, sand, etc.) are common in construction and can reduce operability of the coil spring 14. The sweep 42 may wipe the coil spring 14 during each sash opening and closing cycle along the parallel sides of the jamb track, thus reducing dirt and debris from being drawn into the coil spring 14, which can result in undesirable friction and operational problems.


Additionally, one or more posts 44, for example two posts 44, extend from a top side 45 of the elongate portion 18. These posts 44 engage with corresponding recesses 46 defined in the mounting bracket 16 to couple mounting bracket 16 to shoe body 12, and remain engaged during shipping and/or window assembly, prior to mounting of the window sash. The engagement between the posts 44 and the recesses 46 holds together the window balance system 10, for example, coupling the mounting bracket 16 to the shoe body 12, so as to avoid and reduce inadvertent disengagement during shipping and/or window assembly. However, some known window balance systems, for example the system 10, are roughly handled during shipping and/or window assembly such that the posts 44 may become disengaged from the recesses 46 and the mounting bracket 16 is decoupled from the shoe body 12. This decoupling may increase undesirable wear to the window balance system 10, thus undesirably frustrating the window assembly process.


During operation of the window balance system 10, the coil spring 14 forms a curve 48 of coil spring material between the coil spring 14 and the mounting bracket 16, as shown in FIG. 1. Once the window sash is loaded onto the window balance system 10, the weight of the window sash pulls the shoe body 12 in a downward direction and away from the mounting bracket 16. This downward movement of the shoe body 12 disengages the posts 44 from the recesses 46 and ultimately straightens the curve 48 of the coil spring 14. At this point, the coil spring 14 now bears the weight of the window sash. However, this downward movement also lowers the window sash, which may reduce the egress area of the window or impede egress therethrough.


The constant force balance system 10 requires the coil spring 14 to be extended a certain distance in order to provide enough lift to meet its specified weight capacity. For example, this distance may be about one inch. Thus, if a lower sash of a hung window is opened to its fullest extent and released, it may drop by about one inch until the coil spring 14 offers sufficient resistance to the load of the window sash. This limits the sash opening and the ability to meet safety egress with some known window sizes. For example, the drop of the window sash, induced by the window balance system 10, may limit the total amount of egress area available, thus preventing the window from being rated to a proper egress standard. Some known windows require a clear projected open area for egress is about 5.7 square feet, with the vertical opening being no less than 20 inches and the horizontal opening being no less than 24 inches. As such, some known window balance systems induce the window to drop unexpectedly upon opening to its fullest extent and potentially impeding the egress of a person as they try to pass through the window.



FIGS. 2A and 2B are front perspective views of an example of an inverted constant force window balance system 100, in a disengaged position 102 and an engaged position 104, respectively. With reference to FIGS. 2A and 2B, the window balance system 100 includes a shoe body 106, a coil spring 108, and a mounting bracket 110. The coil spring 108 movably couples the shoe body 106 to the mounting bracket 110. The shoe body 106 may be secured to a window sash (not shown) with screws, bolts, or other mechanical or chemical fasteners (adhesives) and includes an elongate portion 112 having two side walls 114. Two opposing projections 116 extend beyond the side walls 114 of the elongate portion 112 and form an enlarged portion 118. The enlarged portion 118 may define an opening 119 that encloses a locking mechanism (not shown) that includes, for example, a cam (as shown in FIG. 1). The locking mechanism may include locking elements (not shown) that extend outwards from side openings 121 defined in projections 116 upon rotation of the cam, as known in the art. The shoe body 106 and the mounting bracket 110 define a longitudinal axis 120. A longitudinal groove 122 is defined within the elongate portion 112 of the shoe body 106 and extends along the longitudinal axis 120. As described above, the longitudinal groove 122 enables a pivot pin (not shown) connected to the window sash to be dropped into the locking mechanism. The shoe body 106 also includes a coil carrier 124 formed therein that receives a curled portion 126 of the coil spring 108.


The shoe body 106 is coupled to the mounting bracket 110 via the coil spring 108. More specifically, a free end 128 of the coil spring 108 is engaged with the mounting bracket 110. As such, the curled portion 126 provides a retraction force along the longitudinal axis 120 for the shoe body 106 and the connected window sash in relation to the mounting bracket 110 and the free end 128. The mounting bracket 110 may be secured to a jamb channel (not shown) of a window frame with screws, bolts, or other mechanical or chemical fasteners (adhesives).


Additionally, window balance system 100 also includes an engagement mechanism/ratchet system 130 defined and/or formed on at least one of the shoe body 106 and the mounting bracket 110. The ratchet system 130 enables the shoe body 106 to be releasably coupled to the mounting bracket 110 in a plurality of predetermined positions. The ratchet system 130 includes an engagement member 132 and a receiving member 134. The engagement member 132 extends from an end portion 136 of the shoe body 106 along the longitudinal axis 120. The engagement member 132 includes at least one resilient arm, for example, a first and a second resilient arm 138 and 140, respectively. Each resilient arm 138 and 140 has a pawl 142 and 144 extending therefrom and disposed at a free end that facilitates engagement with the receiving member 134. For example, each pawl 142 and 144 defines an enlarged end of the resilient arms 138 and 140, respectively. More specifically, each pawl 142 and 144 includes an angled tooth 146 that extends away from an elongate axis of the resilient arms 138 and 140. The angled tooth 146 may include a leading angular face 148 that enables engagement with the receiving member 134, and also may include a relatively steeper trailing angular face 150 that enables the engagement with the receiving member 134 to be maintained. As such, the shoe body 106 is positioned adjacent to the mounting bracket 110 when the engagement member 132 is engaged with the receiving member 134.


The receiving member 134 is defined on facing surfaces of the mounting bracket 110 and includes at least one linear serration element/rack, for example, a first and a second rack 152 and 154. Each rack 152 and 154 has a plurality of teeth 156 and 158 extending therefrom and along a longitudinal length of the racks 152 and 154. For example, each rack 152 and 154 with teeth 156 and 158 corresponds to each resilient arm 138 and 140 with pawls 142 and 144, such that pawls 142 and 144 are engageable with racks 152 and 154. As shown in FIGS. 2A and 2B, teeth 156 and 158 face in opposite directions and extend towards the longitudinal axis 120, and pawls 142 and 144 face in opposite directions and extend away from the longitudinal axis 120. In alternative examples, the engagement member 132 and the receiving member 134 are defined in any other orientation that enables the window balance system 100 to function as described herein. For example, teeth 156 and 158 may extend away from the longitudinal axis 120. In other examples, the rack 152 and/or 154 may be formed in the same portion of the mounting bracket 110 that is attachable to the window jamb. Such configurations require the ratchet system 130 to be appropriately located, as would be apparent to a person of skill in the art.


Furthermore, in some examples, the window balance system 100 may include at least one projection 160 extending from the end portion 136 of the shoe body 106 and at least one corresponding recess 162 defined within the mounting bracket 110. The projections 160 are engageable with the recesses 162 as described above in reference to FIG. 1. In other examples, projections 160 and recesses 162 are omitted.


In operation, the window balance system 100 is installed into a window frame (not shown). More specifically, the mounting bracket 110 is mounted to a window jamb, while the shoe body 106 is mounted to a window sash. When the window sash is in a closed or partially closed position the window balance system 100 is in the disengaged position 102 as shown in FIG. 2A. As such, the coil spring 108 is extended and induces a biasing force from the shoe body 106 in a direction towards the mounting bracket 110 along the longitudinal axis 120. This biasing force facilitates reducing a lifting force, from the weight of the window sash, required to raise the window sash into an open or more open position.


As the window sash is raised into a fully-opened position, the engagement member 132 is received by the receiving member 134 to releasable couple the shoe body 106 to the mounting bracket 110. By coupling the shoe body 106 to the mounting bracket 110, via the ratchet system 130, the weight of the window sash is at least partially supported by the window balance system 100 such that the window sash is held in the fully-opened position. When the engagement member 132 is received by the receiving member 134, the leading angular face 148 of each pawl 142 and 144 deflects the resilient arm 138 and 140 such that the pawls 142 and 144 pass around each tooth 156 and 158 and the trailing angular face 150 engages and disengages with the individual teeth 156 and 158. Resilient arms 138 and 140 may deflect, for example, flex, without being permanently deformed. The deflection of the resilient arms 138 and 140 may be in a direction towards and away from the longitudinal axis 120.



FIG. 2B shows the window balance system 100 in the engaged position 104. In the engaged position 104, deflection of the resilient arms 138 and 140 induce a retaining force that is normal to the longitudinal axis 120 such that the pawls 142 and 144 are engaged with the racks 152 and 154 coupling the shoe body 106 to the mounting bracket 110, thus enabling the window sash to be held in the fully-opened position. More specifically, the resilient arms 138 and 140 are positioned on the shoe body 106 such that as the arms 138 and 140 are received by the racks 152 and 154, the resilient arms 138 and 140 deflect out of the original disengaged position. As such, the resilience of arms 138 and 140 induce the retaining force that urges the arms 138 and 140 to return the original position. For example, the retaining force engages the pawls 142 and 144 with the racks 152 and 154 and the trailing angular face 150 restricts the pawls 142 and 144 from disengaging, thus coupling the shoe body 106 to the mounting bracket 110.


The trailing angular face 150 may engage with any one of the plurality of teeth 156 and 158 along racks 152 and 154. For example, the pawls 142 and 144 may engage at a first tooth on racks 152 and 154, or the pawls 142 and 144 may engage at a last tooth on racks 152 and 154. While is still other examples, more than one pawl 142 and 144 may extend from each resilient arm 138 and 140 such that more than one tooth on a single rack may be engaged.


When the engagement member 132 is engaged with the receiving member 134, the engagement enables the ratchet system 130 to support at least a portion of the weight of the window sash. As such, when the window sash is raised to the fully-opened position, the coil spring 108 is not required to be in an extended position and may take on a curved configuration, for example the curve 48 (shown in FIG. 1). By supporting the weight of the window sash through the ratchet system 130, the egress of the window will be maintained and the window sash will not partially drop in the fully-opened position. The ratchet system 130 further enables the engagement member 132 to disengage with receiving member 134 upon a disengagement force being induced along the longitudinal axis 120. The disengagement force is sufficient to overcome the retaining force that engages the pawls 142 and 144 with the racks 152 and 154 so as to defect the resilient arms 138 and 140 and disengage the engagement member 132 from the receiving member to facilitate closing the window sash within the window.


Also, the ratchet system 130 serves as a sash travel stop, thus preventing the window sash from being raised too high in the window frame which may cause undesirable impact between a frame header and a lock positioned on an upper portion of the window sash and inducing wear to the header. Moreover, the balance window system 100 may be shipped and installed in the engaged position 104, depicted in FIG. 2B, so as to reduce undesirable wear to the system 100 before operation within the window. The ratchet system 130 forms a more secure coupling between the shoe body 106 and the mounting bracket 110 such that undesirable decoupling during shipping and/or window assembly is decreased.


In the example of FIGS. 2A and 2B, the resilient arms 138 and 140 are disposed on the shoe body 106, while the fixed racks 152 and 154 are disposed on the mounting bracket 110. FIG. 3 is a partial front view of another inverted constant force window balance system 200, in a disengaged position 202. Similar to the window balance system 100 (shown in FIGS. 2A and 2B), the window balance system 200 includes the shoe body 106, the coil spring 108, and the mounting bracket 110. However, in this example, a ratchet system 204 defined therein may be oppositely configured, such that an engagement member 206, including resilient arms 208 and 210, extend from the mounting bracket 110, while a receiving member 212, including fixed racks 214 and 216, is integral with and defined in the shoe body 106. For example, a plurality of teeth 218 and 220 extending from racks 214 and 216, respectively, face in opposite directions and extend away from the longitudinal axis 120, and pawls 222 and 224 extending from resilient arms 208 and 210, respectively, face in opposite directions and extend towards the longitudinal axis 120. In alternative examples, the engagement member 206 and the receiving member 212 are defined in any other orientation that enables the window balance system 200 to function as described herein.


During operation of the window balance system 200, the shoe body 106 and the mounting bracket 110 are enabled to be movably positioned in relation to one another along the longitudinal axis 120 as described above in further detail. When engaging the engagement member 206 with the receiving member 210 such that the window balance system 200 is in an engaged position (not shown), resilient arms 208 and 212 deflect during engagement with the racks 214 and 216, respectively. In other examples, the arms are fixed and/or static and each tooth is resilient, as such each tooth may deflect when engaged and disengaged with the corresponding static pawl and induce the retaining force within the ratchet system. In yet further contemplated examples, opposite and/or both sets of teeth and arms/pawls may be resilient and deflect thus inducing the retaining force within the ratchet system.



FIGS. 4A and 4B are front views of an example of a constant force window balance system 300, in a disengaged position 302 and an engaged position 304, respectively. Similar to the window balance systems described above, the window balance system 300 includes the shoe body 106, the coil spring 108, and the mounting bracket 110. However, in this example, a coiled portion of the coil spring 108 is received in a coil carrier 306 disposed in the mounting bracket 110. With reference to both FIGS. 4A and 4B, the window balance system 300 includes the mounting bracket 110 having the coil carrier 306 formed therein. The free end 128 of the coil spring 106 is coupled to the shoe body 106 at an end surface 308 opposite the enlarged portion 118 forming the biasing force/retraction force for the shoe body 106 and the window sash coupled thereto. Placement of the coil spring 108 is the difference between the inverted constant force balance systems 100 and 200 of FIGS. 2A-3 and the constant force balance system 300 of FIGS. 4A and 4B. In the constant force balance system 300 of FIGS. 4A and 4B, the spring coil 108 is stationary on the mounting bracket 110 and thus does not move with the window sash. Regardless, the engagement/ratchet systems described herein may be used on both inverted constant force balance systems and standard constant force balance systems.


The window balance system 300 also includes a ratchet system 308. For example, ratchet system 308 includes an engagement member 310 having a resilient arm 312 extending from the shoe body 106 and a pawl 314 positioned at a free end. Ratchet system 308 also includes a receiving member 316 having a rack 318 defined therein and a plurality of teeth 320 extending therefrom. In the depicted example, a single resilient arm 312 is engageable with the rack 318. In alternative examples, multiple arms and racks may be included as described in the previous examples. Additionally, the arm 312 and the rack 318 may be disposed on either side of the longitudinal axis 120 and with the pawl 314 and the teeth 320 facing in any direction that enables the ratchet system 308 to function as described herein.


During operation of the window balance system 300, the shoe body 106 and the mounting bracket 110 are enabled to be movably positioned in relation to one another along the longitudinal axis 120 as described above in further detail. When engaging the engagement member 310 with the receiving member 316, the resilient arms 312 deflect during engagement with the rack 318. While in the engaged position 304, the ratchet system 308 enables the window sash to be held in the fully-opened position when installed within the window, and also facilitates maintaining the shoe body 106 in contact with the mounting bracket 110 during shipping and window assembly.



FIG. 5 is an enlarged view of an example of a mounting bracket 400 for use with the window balance systems described herein. The mounting bracket 400 includes a body 402 having a pair of racks, for example, a first rack 404 and a second rack 406 formed therein. Each rack 404 and 406 has a plurality of teeth 408 and 410, respectively, extending therefrom. The body 402 extends along the longitudinal axis 120, while the racks 404 and 406 extend at an angle α relative to the longitudinal axis 120 and along a pitch axis P. For example, each rack 404 and 406 is pitched at an angle α within a range between and including 0° to about 15° in relation to the longitudinal axis 120. In other examples, the angle α may be between about 3° and about 12°. In another example, the angle α may be between about 5° and about 10°. Other angles α are contemplated that enable the mounting bracket 400 to function as described herein.


In operation, by pitching the racks 404 and 406, a retention force between the resilient arms (not shown) and an associated tooth of the rack 404 and 406 increases as each tooth extends farther up the rack 404 and 406 (e.g., towards a top of the mounting bracket 400), and forming a variable force ratchet system within the window balance system. In alternative examples, each rack 404 and 406 may be formed on the shoe body (not shown) as depicted in FIG. 3.



FIG. 6 is an enlarged view of another mounting bracket that may be used with the window balance systems described herein. A ratchet system 500 includes the mounting bracket 110 having a pair of racks, for example, a first rack 504 and a second rack 506 formed therein. Each rack 504 and 506 has a pair of facing toothed structures 508 extending therein such that a channel 510 is defined therebetween. The shoe body 106 includes a pair of resilient arms 512 and 514 that include a corresponding pawl 516 extending therefrom that are receivable with the channel 510. In operation, the shoe body 106 couples to the mounting bracket 110 via the racks 504 and 506 inducing a retaining force on the resilient arms 512 and 514 and pawls 516 thereon. In alternative examples, each rack 504 and 506 may be formed on the shoe body 106 and the resilient arms 512 and 514 extending from the mounting bracket 110 as depicted in FIG. 3.



FIG. 7 is a front view of another inverted constant force window balance system 600 in an engaged position 602. Similar to the window balance systems described above, the window balance system 600 includes a shoe body 604 (also known as a carrier), a coil spring 606, and a mounting bracket 608. In this example, the shoe body 604 is substantially rectangularly shaped and houses the coil spring 606 therein. The shoe body 604 is described further in U.S. Pat. No. 5,353,548, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. The window balance system 600 also includes a ratchet system 610 that enables the shoe body 604 to releasably couple to the mounting bracket 610. The ratchet system 610 includes at least one static receiving member, for example, a pair of static receiving members 612, extending from an end surface 614 of the shoe body 604. In this example, the static receiving members 612 are dog bone shaped members that extend along the depth of the shoe body 604. Each static receiving member 612 includes an inner surface 615 that is opposite the end surface 614. The ratchet system 610 further includes at least one pawl, for example, a pair of pawls 616 each extending from a resilient arm 618 coupled to and extending from the mounting bracket 608. In this example, each pawl 616 extends from the resilient arm 618 in a different direction, for example, towards and away from the longitudinal axis 120.


In operation, the pawls 616 selectively engage and disengage with the static receiving members 612 via a resilient retaining force 620. More specifically, when the mounting bracket 608 is received by the shoe body 604, each pawl 616 deflects the resilient arm 618 from an original position around the static receiving members 612 such that each pawl 616 engages with its associated inner surface 615. The resilient arms 618 may deflect or flex from the original position without being permanently deformed. In the engaged position 602, deflection of the resilient arms 618 induce the retaining force 620 that is normal to the longitudinal axis 120 such that the pawls 616 are engaged with the static receiving members 612. When in the engaged position 602, the ratchet system 610 enables the mounting bracket 608 to be coupled to the shoe body 604. This coupling prevents undesirable separation between the mounting bracket 608 and the shoe body 604 during shipping and window assembly of the window balance system 600. Furthermore, when the window sash is raised to the fully-opened position, the ratchet system 610 may further support the weight of the window sash to reduce window sash drop. The ratchet system 610 further enables the pawls 616 to disengage with the static receiving members 612 upon a disengagement force being induced along the longitudinal axis 120. The disengagement force is sufficient to overcome the retaining force 620 that engages the pawls 616 with the static support members 612 so as to defect the resilient arms 618.



FIG. 8 is a front view of another inverted constant force window balance system 700 in a disengaged position 702. Similar to the window balance systems described above, the window balance system 700 includes a shoe body 704, a coil spring 706, and a mounting bracket 708. In this example, the shoe body 704 is substantially rectangularly shaped and houses the coil spring 706 therein, as described in more detail in FIG. 7 above. However, in this example, a ratchet system 710 includes a receiving member 712 defined in the mounting bracket 708 and an engagement member 714 coupled to the shoe body 704. The receiving member 714 includes a pair of racks 716 defined on facing surfaces of the mounting bracket 708, similar to the examples described above in reference to FIGS. 2A, 2B, and 4A-6. The engagement member 714 includes a body 716 that is coupled to the shoe body 704. The engagement member body 716 includes a pair of resilient arms 718 that extend along the longitudinal axis 120. At each free end of the resilient arms 718, a pawl 720 extends therefrom that is engageable with the racks 716. The engagement member body 716 is removably coupled to the shoe body 706 via static receiving members 722. Similar to FIG. 7 described above, static receiving members 722 are dog bone shaped members that extend from an end surface 724 of the shoe body 704. The engagement member body 716 includes a pair of corresponding recesses 726 that receive the static receiving members 722. In alternative examples, the racks 716 may be defined within engagement member body 716 and the resilient arms 718 extend from the mounting bracket 708 similar to the example described above in reference to FIG. 3.


In operation, the engagement member body 716 is removably coupled to the shoe body 704 such that the ratchet system 710 is formed on the window balance system 700 and the shoe body 704 may be releasably coupled to the mounting bracket 710, as described in detail above. As such, when in an engaged position, the ratchet system 710 enables the mounting bracket 708 to be coupled to the shoe body 704 via the engagement member body 716 to prevent undesirable separation between the mounting bracket 708 and the shoe body 704 during shipping and window assembly of the window balance system 700. Furthermore, when the window sash is raised to the fully-opened position, the ratchet system 710 may further support the weight of the window sash to reduce window sash drop in a fully-open position.


The materials utilized in the engagement systems described herein may be those typically utilized for window and window component manufacture. Material selection for most of the components may be based on the proposed use of the window. Appropriate materials may be selected for the sash retention systems used on particularly heavy window panels, as well as on windows subject to certain environmental conditions (e.g., moisture, corrosive atmospheres, etc.). Aluminum, steel, stainless steel, or composite materials can be utilized. Bendable and/or moldable plastics may be particularly useful. For example, the shoe body and/or the mounting bracket may be unitarily formed with the engagement member and/or the receiving member. While in other examples, the engagement member and/or receiving member may couple to the shoe body and/or mounting bracket as an accessory for the window balance system.


While there have been described herein what are to be considered exemplary and preferred examples of the present technology, other modifications of the technology will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the teachings herein. The particular methods of manufacture and geometries disclosed herein are exemplary in nature and are not to be considered limiting. It is therefore desired to be secured in the appended claims all such modifications as fall within the spirit and scope of the technology. Accordingly, what is desired to be secured by Letters Patent is the technology as defined and differentiated in the following claims, and all equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. A window balance system comprising: a mounting bracket configured to be secured to a window jamb;a shoe body defining a longitudinal axis;a coil spring movably coupling the mounting bracket to the shoe body;an engagement member extending from at least one of the mounting bracket and the shoe body, wherein the engagement member comprises at least one resilient arm having a pawl extending therefrom; anda receiving member defined in at least the other one of the mounting bracket and the shoe body, wherein the receiving member comprises at least one rack having at least one tooth extending therefrom such that the pawl is engageable with the at least one tooth, and wherein the engagement between the pawl and the at least one tooth at least partially deflects the resilient arm in a direction toward and away from the longitudinal axis.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one resilient arm extends longitudinally from an end portion of the shoe body and the pawl comprises an enlarged end of the at least one resilient arm.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one rack is disposed at an angle in relation to the longitudinal axis.
  • 4. The system of claim 3, wherein the angle is within a range between and including 0° and 15°.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the engagement member comprises a first resilient arm and a second resilient arm, wherein each pawl faces in an opposite direction.
  • 6. The system of claim 5, wherein the receiving member comprises a first rack and a second rack, wherein each at least one tooth faces in an opposite direction.
  • 7. The system of claim 5, wherein the shoe body comprises a carrier configured to receive a curled portion of the coil spring.
  • 8. The system of claim 1, wherein the engagement member extends from the mounting bracket and the receiving member is defined in the shoe body.
  • 9. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one rack comprises a pair of facing toothed structures defining a channel therebetween, the channel configured to receive the pawl therein.
  • 10. The system of claim 1, wherein the engagement member comprises a body coupled to the shoe body.
  • 11. A window balance system comprising: a shoe body comprising: an end portion; anda pair of resilient arms extending from the end portion, each resilient arm having a pawl extending therefrom; anda mounting bracket comprising a pair of racks, each rack having a plurality of teeth extending therefrom such that each pawl is engageable with the corresponding rack.
  • 12. The system of claim 11 further comprising a coil spring configured to couple the shoe body to the mounting bracket.
  • 13. The system of claim 11, wherein the pair of racks are disposed on facing surfaces of the mounting bracket.
  • 14. The system of claim 11, wherein the pawl comprises an angled tooth extending away from an elongate axis of the resilient arm.
  • 15. The system of claim 14, wherein the angled tooth comprises a leading angular face and a trailing angular face, the trailing angular face is configured to engage with the plurality of teeth.
  • 16. The system of claim 11, wherein the pawl is configured to engage with any one of the plurality of teeth.
PRIORITY CLAIM

This application claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/258,216, filed on Nov. 20, 2015, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (256)
Number Name Date Kind
698168 Barnum Apr 1902 A
887968 Selkirk May 1908 A
1007212 Lasersohn Oct 1911 A
1312665 Almquist Aug 1919 A
1420503 Throne Jun 1922 A
1480453 Lane Jan 1924 A
2069025 Anderson Jan 1937 A
2178533 Viehweger Oct 1939 A
2209293 Cannon Jul 1940 A
2602958 Brown Jul 1952 A
2609191 Foster Sep 1952 A
2609193 Foster Sep 1952 A
2622267 Peremi Dec 1952 A
2635282 Trammell, Sr. et al. Apr 1953 A
2644193 Anderberg Jul 1953 A
2684499 Lewis Jul 1954 A
2732594 Adams et al. Jan 1956 A
2739344 Dickinson Mar 1956 A
2766492 Day Oct 1956 A
2807045 Chenoweth Sep 1957 A
2817872 Foster Dec 1957 A
2851721 Decker et al. Sep 1958 A
2873472 Foster Feb 1959 A
2952884 Dinsmore Sep 1960 A
3007194 Griswold Nov 1961 A
3105576 Jones et al. Oct 1963 A
3150420 Brenner Sep 1964 A
3184784 Peters May 1965 A
3364622 Collard Jan 1968 A
3434236 Weidner et al. Mar 1969 A
3445964 Foster May 1969 A
3452480 Foster Jul 1969 A
3461608 Johnson Aug 1969 A
3475865 Arnes Nov 1969 A
3497999 Hendra Mar 1970 A
3529381 Grossman Sep 1970 A
3676956 Taylor et al. Jul 1972 A
3732594 Mills May 1973 A
3820193 Foster Jun 1974 A
3844066 Nobes Oct 1974 A
3869754 Foster Mar 1975 A
3992751 Foster et al. Nov 1976 A
4028849 Anderson Jun 1977 A
4068406 Wood Jan 1978 A
4079549 Wood Mar 1978 A
4089085 Fitzgibbon May 1978 A
4190930 Prosser Mar 1980 A
4227345 Durham, Jr. Oct 1980 A
4228620 Hutchins Oct 1980 A
4300316 Ficurilli Nov 1981 A
4332054 Paist et al. Jun 1982 A
4364199 Johnson et al. Dec 1982 A
4446654 Schoolman et al. May 1984 A
4452012 Deal Jun 1984 A
4506478 Anderson Mar 1985 A
4510713 Anderson Apr 1985 A
4517766 Haltof May 1985 A
4555868 Mancuso Dec 1985 A
4570382 Suess Feb 1986 A
4571887 Haltof Feb 1986 A
4590708 Campodonico May 1986 A
4610108 Marshik Sep 1986 A
4642845 Marshik Feb 1987 A
4683676 Sterner, Jr. Aug 1987 A
4689850 Flight Sep 1987 A
4697304 Overgard Oct 1987 A
4704821 Berndt Nov 1987 A
4718194 FitzGibbon et al. Jan 1988 A
4785581 Abramson et al. Nov 1988 A
4799333 Westfall et al. Jan 1989 A
4837976 Westfall et al. Jun 1989 A
4854077 Rogers et al. Aug 1989 A
4885871 Westfall et al. Dec 1989 A
4888915 Goldenberg Dec 1989 A
4914861 May Apr 1990 A
4922657 Foss May 1990 A
4930254 Valentin Jun 1990 A
4935987 Sterner, Jr. Jun 1990 A
4941285 Westfall Jul 1990 A
4949425 Dodson et al. Aug 1990 A
4953258 Mennuto Sep 1990 A
4958462 Cross Sep 1990 A
4961247 Leitzel et al. Oct 1990 A
5035081 Yamamoto et al. Jul 1991 A
5036621 Iwasaki Aug 1991 A
5069001 Makarowski Dec 1991 A
5113922 Christensen et al. May 1992 A
5119591 Sterner, Jr. et al. Jun 1992 A
5119592 Westfall et al. Jun 1992 A
5127192 Cross Jul 1992 A
5140769 Hickson et al. Aug 1992 A
5157808 Sterner, Jr. Oct 1992 A
5189838 Westfall Mar 1993 A
5210976 Cripps May 1993 A
5232208 Braid et al. Aug 1993 A
5251401 Prete et al. Oct 1993 A
5301467 Schmidt et al. Apr 1994 A
5353548 Westfall Oct 1994 A
5365638 Braid et al. Nov 1994 A
5371971 Prete Dec 1994 A
5377384 Riegelman Jan 1995 A
5383303 Nakanishi et al. Jan 1995 A
D355262 Chaney et al. Feb 1995 S
5440837 Piltingsrud Aug 1995 A
5445364 Tibbals, Jr. Aug 1995 A
5448858 Briggs et al. Sep 1995 A
5452495 Briggs Sep 1995 A
5463793 Westfall Nov 1995 A
5463795 Carlson et al. Nov 1995 A
5530991 deNormand et al. Jul 1996 A
5544450 Schmidt et al. Aug 1996 A
5553903 Prete et al. Sep 1996 A
5566507 Schmidt et al. Oct 1996 A
5572828 Westfall Nov 1996 A
5615452 Habbersett Apr 1997 A
5632117 Prete et al. May 1997 A
5632118 Stark May 1997 A
5661927 Polowinczak et al. Sep 1997 A
5669180 Maier Sep 1997 A
5697188 Fullick et al. Dec 1997 A
5699636 Stark Dec 1997 A
5704165 Slocomb et al. Jan 1998 A
5737877 Meunier et al. Apr 1998 A
5802767 Slocomb et al. Sep 1998 A
5806243 Prete et al. Sep 1998 A
5806900 Bratcher et al. Sep 1998 A
5829196 Maier Nov 1998 A
5852854 Pierrot et al. Dec 1998 A
5855092 Raap et al. Jan 1999 A
5873199 Meunier et al. Feb 1999 A
5924243 Polowinczak et al. Jul 1999 A
5927013 Slocomb et al. Jul 1999 A
5943822 Slocomb et al. Aug 1999 A
5996283 Maier Dec 1999 A
6032417 Jakus et al. Mar 2000 A
6041475 Nidelkoff Mar 2000 A
6041476 deNormand Mar 2000 A
6041550 Tix Mar 2000 A
6058653 Slocomb et al. May 2000 A
6119398 Yates, Jr. Sep 2000 A
D434637 Habeck et al. Dec 2000 S
6155615 Schultz Dec 2000 A
6161335 Beard et al. Dec 2000 A
6161657 Zhuang Dec 2000 A
6178696 Liang Jan 2001 B1
6226923 Hicks et al. May 2001 B1
6305126 Hendrickson et al. Oct 2001 B1
6378169 Batten et al. Apr 2002 B1
6393661 Braid et al. May 2002 B1
D462258 Meunier Sep 2002 S
D464256 Meunier Oct 2002 S
6467128 Damani Oct 2002 B1
6470530 Trunkle Oct 2002 B1
D467490 Uken et al. Dec 2002 S
6553620 Guillemet et al. Apr 2003 B2
6584644 Braid et al. Jul 2003 B2
6606761 Braid et al. Aug 2003 B2
6622342 Annes et al. Sep 2003 B1
6679000 Uken et al. Jan 2004 B2
6763550 Regnier Jul 2004 B2
6820368 Uken et al. Nov 2004 B2
6840011 Thompson et al. Jan 2005 B2
6848148 Braid et al. Feb 2005 B2
6857228 Kunz et al. Feb 2005 B2
6860066 Kunz et al. Mar 2005 B2
6931788 Uken et al. Aug 2005 B2
6983513 Pettit Jan 2006 B2
6990710 Kunz et al. Jan 2006 B2
7076835 Harold et al. Jul 2006 B2
7143475 Annes et al. Dec 2006 B2
7191562 Uken et al. Mar 2007 B2
7552510 Harold et al. Jun 2009 B2
7587787 Pettit Sep 2009 B2
7673372 Annes et al. Mar 2010 B2
7703175 Tuller Apr 2010 B2
7735191 Tuller Jun 2010 B2
7937809 Tuller May 2011 B2
7945994 Dallas et al. May 2011 B2
7966770 Kunz Jun 2011 B1
8074402 Tuller Dec 2011 B2
8132290 Liang et al. Mar 2012 B2
8181396 Kunz May 2012 B1
8313310 Uchikado Nov 2012 B2
8365356 Robertson Feb 2013 B2
8371068 Kunz Feb 2013 B1
8424248 Uken et al. Apr 2013 B2
8505242 Kunz Aug 2013 B1
8539642 Baker Sep 2013 B2
8561260 Baker Oct 2013 B2
8640383 Kunz Feb 2014 B1
8813310 Baker et al. Aug 2014 B2
8819896 Kellum, III et al. Sep 2014 B2
8850745 Sofianek et al. Oct 2014 B2
8918979 Baker Dec 2014 B2
RE45328 Tuller Jan 2015 E
8966822 Sofianek et al. Mar 2015 B2
9003710 Kellum, III et al. Apr 2015 B2
9121209 Baker et al. Sep 2015 B2
9133656 Steen et al. Sep 2015 B2
9458655 deNormand Oct 2016 B2
9580950 Uken et al. Feb 2017 B2
10208517 Lucci Feb 2019 B2
10344514 Uken Jul 2019 B2
20020053117 Braid et al. May 2002 A1
20020092241 Uken et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020104189 Braid et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020129463 Newman Sep 2002 A1
20030074764 Pettit et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030192147 Braid et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030192257 Uken et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030213096 Annes et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040006845 Polowinczak et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040163209 Pettit Aug 2004 A1
20040216380 Uken et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040237256 Lutfallah Dec 2004 A1
20040244158 Awakura et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040244295 Derham Dec 2004 A1
20050055802 Braid et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050178068 Uken et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050198775 Pettit et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050229492 Robertson Oct 2005 A1
20060086052 Petta et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060207185 Shuler et al. Sep 2006 A1
20070011846 Braid et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070101654 Robertson May 2007 A1
20070113479 Uken et al. May 2007 A1
20080047099 Malek Feb 2008 A1
20080120804 Annes et al. May 2008 A1
20080178424 Tuller Jul 2008 A1
20080178425 Tuler Jul 2008 A1
20090188075 Baker Jul 2009 A1
20090260295 Tuller Oct 2009 A1
20100115854 Uken et al. May 2010 A1
20110067314 Baker Mar 2011 A1
20110239402 Steen et al. Oct 2011 A1
20120297687 Baker et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130283699 Kellum, III et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130340349 Baker Dec 2013 A1
20140000172 Sofianek Jan 2014 A1
20140026490 Baker et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140208653 Sofianek et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140208655 Stoakes et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140259524 Kellum, III Sep 2014 A1
20140259936 DeNormand et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140331561 Baker et al. Nov 2014 A1
20150167379 Sofianek et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150361701 Steen Dec 2015 A1
20150368952 Baker et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160222709 Wynder Aug 2016 A1
20160298368 Kunz Oct 2016 A1
20160298369 Kunz Oct 2016 A1
20170089109 Steen et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170211305 Uken et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170370138 Uken et al. Dec 2017 A1
20180291660 Kellum Oct 2018 A1
20190085609 Kellum Mar 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (30)
Number Date Country
1155341 Oct 1983 CA
2119506 Oct 1994 CA
2382933 Apr 2002 CA
2338403 Apr 2006 CA
2596293 Feb 2008 CA
2619267 Jul 2008 CA
2619289 Jul 2008 CA
2820240 Jan 2014 CA
2836375 Jul 2014 CA
4211695 Oct 1992 DE
329996 May 1930 GB
723056 Feb 1955 GB
740223 Nov 1955 GB
1505782 Mar 1978 GB
2195691 Apr 1988 GB
2236786 Apr 1991 GB
2254875 Oct 1992 GB
2276655 Oct 1994 GB
2278626 Dec 1994 GB
2280697 Feb 1995 GB
2292168 Feb 1996 GB
2295634 Jun 1996 GB
56-171982 Jan 1981 JP
03197785 Aug 1991 JP
5-52273 Jul 1993 JP
3025244 Jun 1996 JP
63-3785 Jan 1998 JP
2000283025 Oct 2000 JP
2004293388 Oct 2004 JP
2005113907 Apr 2005 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (13)
Entry
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application PCT/US2018/026500, dated Jun. 22, 2018, 13 pages.
“Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 9,133,656 Pursuant to 37 CFR 1.510 et seq”, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/081,089, entitled Inverted Constant Force Window Balance for Tilt Sash, filed Feb. 26, 2016, 19 pgs.
Balance Systems—BSI Amesbury Group, Inc. Crossbow Balance Advertisement dated Jun. 7, 1999 (3 pgs.).
BSI Tilt Balance Systems, Balance Systems—BSI, Amesbury Group, Inc., 1996-2001, 4 pgs.
BSI's Hidden Advantage: It's as Easy as 1-2-3, Balance Systems—BSI, Amesbury Group, Inc., 2001, 3 pgs.
Response by Patent Owner to Office Action in Ex-Parte Re-Examination Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 1.550(e) for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 90/013,695, filed Aug. 23, 2016, 13 pages.
Crossbow Balance! Another New Balance in BSI's Quiver, Balance Systems—BSI, Amesbury Group, Inc., Jun. 7, 1999, 2 pgs.
Dakota Balance—Balances and Accessories Brochure, May 2001, 2 pgs.
DWM Door & Window Maker Magazine, “2004 Annual Buyers Guide”, vol. 5, Issue 3, Apr. 2004, 2 pgs.
Ex-Parte Re-Examination Office Action for corresponding Re-Examination U.S. Appl. No. 90/013,695 dated Jun. 23, 2016, 8 pgs.
Heinberg, “Latest Trends in Window and Door Hardware,” Shelter Magazine, Jul. 2001, cover and p. 11.
PCT International Search Report, Written Opinion, and International Preliminary Report on Patentability (with 37 sheets of annexes) for PCT/US2011/024134; ISA/US, dated Feb. 9, 2011 (113 pages total).
Photographs of the Crossbow Balance Component shown in C6 (7 views; 3 pgs).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170145722 A1 May 2017 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62258216 Nov 2015 US