The present disclosure is directed to rotary line devices, such as winches and the like, and particularly to a rotary line device/winch integrated into an electro hydraulic hybrid vehicle having a power and control system to achieve a constant pull force. The present disclosure further relates to winches and more particularly to a drum layer compensated load limiting controller for a winch.
A conventional rotary line device, also referred to as a winch, includes a support structure that is attachable to a recovery vehicle. A winch drum is rotatably mounted on the support structure, with a winch cable or rope being attached to the winch drum and wound about the winch drum in multiple layers. A reversible winch motor is mounted on the support structure for rotating the drum, with a speed reduction transmission connected between the winch motor and the drum. A normally-engaged, releasable drum brake assembly also is mounted on the support structure and connected to the winch drum to stop drum rotation.
A control system is operable to release the drum brake and operate the winch motor in the appropriate direction to pay out or pull in the winch cable as needed. Typically, the winch motor is a single or dual displacement reversible hydraulic motor, and the control system likewise is hydraulic because hydraulic systems can provide high power but are relatively uncomplicated and easy to maintain and service. Electric winch motors and control systems alternatively may be employed.
In conventional rotary line devices, such as the described winch, the components, and particularly the support structure and winch rope, are designed and constructed to exert and withstand desired maximum pulling tension and torque forces, essentially the forces experienced when the rope is fully wound. Such maximums typically are substantially greater than the pulling force actually required to pull a load when the rope is unwound within a typical range of usefulness. Relatedly, in a single displacement hydraulic motor, the maximum hydraulic fluid flow and pressure differential across the motor are likewise constant and set based on such maximum requirements, resulting in the maximum motor torque and motor speed also being constant based on the desired maximum capabilities of the winch.
In operation of a winch and associated winch motor, therefore, as the number of layers of winch cable or rope wound about the axis of the drum increases from being wound, the load “seen” by the winch motor increases. This is because the mechanical advantage against the winch increases by virtue of the increase in length of the effective lever arm by adding layers of wound rope. The result can be that the winch can no longer pull the load because with each successive layer of rope that forms on the drum, the pulling force proportionally decreases. For conventional hydraulic winch motors, for which the motor typically has a constant pressure applied, it is not unusual for a winch to lose 40% of the pulling force by as little as the fifth layer of wound rope. Thus, increased torque from the motor above that when wrapping the first layer of cable is required to counteract the proportional decrease in the pulling force as each successive layer of cable wraps around the drum. As a result, the winch components must be designed to withstand the greatest pulling force imposed by the motor when only a single layer of cable is present, even though this greatest pulling force is substantially greater than the force actually produced on successive layers of cable.
Accordingly, a conventional winch is designed so as to accommodate a rope size and structural integrity sufficient for the maximum line pull produced with the first rope layer. To meet this need, conventional retrieval winches and similar rotary line devices are relatively large physically to meet the greatest pulling force requirements. It is desirable, however, to mount such retrieval winch devices onto a vehicle of relatively modest size (e.g., pickup truck, SUV, light truck or car) in which space is at a premium. It has been difficult, therefore, to balance the need for a large winch device to meet the greatest pulling force requirements with a small size for vehicle mounting, while still practically having sufficient power for typical usages.
In conventional winches, the line pull force on the cable or rope is a function of motor torque and the drum diameter that is largely influenced by the number of layers of cable or rope that are wrapped around the drum. Thus, for a given motor torque or current, the available line force is dependent on the number of layers of rope or cable that are wrapped on the drum.
The accepted practice for rating winches for rated load is the maximum pull force on the bottom layer of rope or cable that is wrapped around the drum. Conventional methods for limiting the load of hydraulic winches to prevent rope breakage indirectly limit the load using a pressure relief valve. This results in reduced rated load on subsequent layers due to increased torque on the drive motor therefore reaching the relief pressure at lower and lower loads proportional to the layer.
Historically, one alternative is to use a traction winch with a separate storage drum adding both weight and expense.
The winch of the present disclosure provides a generally constant pull force as the cable or rope is rewound onto the winch drum. According to an embodiment, the winch utilizes a hydraulic motor to rotate the winch drum to extend or retract the cable or rope. The hydraulic motor may be a low speed high torque motor, or any other appropriate hydraulic motor. When the cable or rope is rewound, the lever arm of the winch increases by virtue of the increase of the distance from the centerline of the drum to the outer limit of the wound portion of the rope. The pulling force exerted on the cable rope thus decreases as the distance increases from the outer edge of the layered wound portion of the cable or rope to the centerline of the winch drum. To maintain a constant pulling force, the hydraulic fluid pressure to the hydraulic motor must be increased proportionally with the increase in distance associated with the number of layers of cable wrapped around the drum.
The constant pulling force is maintained using a feedback control system. In one exemplary embodiment of such system, the rope position is determined using a position sensor that rests against the cable or rope that is wound onto the drum. The position sensor may be integrated into a tensioner that is common in various types of winches. As a tensioner plate of the tensioner is forced away from the drum by the cable or rope wrapping around the drum in a layered fashion, the change in position of the rope is determined using the position sensor. The control system then increases the pressure to the hydraulic motor to maintain a constant pull force. Another method to compensate for the changes due to the wrapping of the cable or rope around the drum is to sense the change in load on the cable or rope when the distance from the rope and the axis of rotation of the drum changes. The control system then increases the pressure to the hydraulic motor to maintain a constant pull force.
Accordingly, aspects of the invention include a constant pulling force winch control system, and a related winch system and methods of operating such a system under control of the described control system. Exemplary embodiments of the winch control system include a sensor that senses a degree of winding of a winch cable around a winch drum, and a control system configured to control a winch motor to achieve a constant pulling force on the winch cable based on the degree of winding sensed by the sensor. The sensor may be a position sensor that measures a position of the winch cable relative to a centerline of a winch drum as the degree of winding. The position sensor may sense an angular position of a tension plate relative to a tensioner shaft to measure the degree of winding. The winch motor may be a hydraulic winch motor, and the control system is configured to control the hydraulic pressure applied to the hydraulic winch motor to achieve the constant pulling force based on the degree of winding sensed by the sensor. Alternatively, the winch motor may be an electric motor and the control system is configured to control the electric current applied to the electric winch motor.
These and further features of the present invention will be apparent with reference to the following description and attached drawings. In the description and drawings, particular embodiments of the invention have been disclosed in detail as being indicative of some of the ways in which the principles of the invention may be employed, but it is understood that the invention is not limited correspondingly in scope. Rather, the invention includes all changes, modifications and equivalents coming within the spirit and terms of the claims appended hereto.
Features that are described and/or illustrated with respect to one embodiment may be used in the same way or in a similar way in one or more other embodiments and/or in combination with or instead of the features of the other embodiments.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described with reference to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals are used to refer to like elements throughout. It will be understood that the figures are not necessarily to scale.
The control system 22 may be configured as one or more processor devices, microprocessors, control circuits or like device as are known in the art as utilized in electronic control systems. The controller further may include memory devices and/or comparable computer readable media for storing executable computer program code that when executed, causes the control of hydraulic pressure so as to maintain a constant maximum pulling force of a winch rope. To achieve such control, the winch system 20 may include at least one sensor component 24 that senses the degree of winding of the winch cable or rope. As described above, such degree of winding is indicative of the load seen by the winch and thus provides an effective basis for control of hydraulic pressure to maintain a constant pulling force. Collectively, the control system 22 and sensor component 24 may be referred to as a constant pulling force winch control system 22/24.
As further described below, in exemplary embodiments the sensor component 24 is a position sensor that senses a position of the cable or rope relative to a centerline of the winch drum. The sensed position of the cable or rope effectively constitutes a measure of the radial distance r or r′ as described above with respect to
Whether position or load is sensed, sensing data from the sensor component 24 is read by the control system 22 so as to dynamically provide an indication of the changing pulling force occurring as the cable or rope is wound or unwound about the winch drum. To maintain a predetermined constant maximum pulling force, the control system 22 determines a hydraulic pressure required to be applied to the motor to maintain such constant pulling force. Based on such determination, the control system 22 outputs a control signal to the hydraulic motor system 26 to adjust the hydraulic pressure applied to the motor as need to maintain a constant pulling force. For example, as the winch cable or rope is wound around the winch drum from the first layer, the sensor component senses increased windings around the drum centerline (an increasing r), and the control system 22 outputs a control signal to the hydraulic motor system to increase the hydraulic pressure. Conversely, as the winch cable or rope is unwound from the winch drum, the sensor component senses decreased windings around the drum centerline (a decreasing r), and the control system 22 outputs a control signal to the hydraulic motor system to decrease the hydraulic pressure. The hydraulic motor system in turn drives the winch 28 in a manner that maintains a constant pulling force on the cable or rope based on the dynamically changing hydraulic pressure.
As seen particularly in
The control system 22, referenced above with respect to
As depicted in the exemplary embodiments of
Because of the movement of the tension plate 52 with the unwinding and winding of the cable or rope, the angular position of the tension plate 52 provides an indication of the degree of winding of the drum. Furthermore, as referenced above, to maintain a constant pulling force by the winch, the hydraulic pressure applied to the hydraulic motor must be increased as the cable or rope is further wound around the drum, and conversely decreased as the cable or rope is unwound. In the present invention, because the angular position of the tension plate 52 provides a measure of the degree of winding of the cable or rope, the position of the tension plate is utilized by the control system to control the level of hydraulic pressure being applied to the motor. In an alternative system, using an electric motor, the control system controls the level of current supplied to the electric motor.
The method may begin at step 100, at which a desired predefined constant maximum pulling force is set. The predefined maximum pulling force can be set based upon the winches' maximum pulling force rating. As referenced above, the predefined maximum pulling force may set based on any suitable parameters that may be relevant to winch operation including, but not limited to, cable strength. At step 110, a degree of winding of the cable around a winch drum is determined. In exemplary embodiments, an angular position of a tension plate pressed against a wound portion of the winch cable is determined. Such angular position may be determined, for example, using the position sensor 54 described above. At step 120, a motor pressure is applied to a winch motor to achieve the predefined constant pulling force. In exemplary embodiments, the motor pressure is a hydraulic pressure applied to a hydraulic motor system such as the hydraulic motor system 34, and the hydraulic pressure may be controlled by a control system such as the control system 22.
At step 130, the degree of the cable winding is monitored, such as for example by monitoring the angular position of the tension plate. At step 140, a determination is made as to whether a change is detected in the degree of winding of the cable, such as by detecting a change in the angular position of the tension plate. Such operations may be performed by the control system 22 operating in conjunction with the position sensor 54. If a “No” determination is made in step 140, i.e., the degree of winding of the cable based on the position of the tension plate has not changed, then the method proceeds to step 150 and the current motor pressure is maintained.
If, however, a “Yes” determination is made in step 140, i.e., the degree of winding of the cable based on the position of the tension plate has indeed changed, then the method proceeds to step 160 and the motor pressure is adjusted to maintain the predefined constant pulling force. For example, when the angular position of the tension plate has adjusted upward and away from the drum axis (indicating increased wound thickness of the cable), the control system causes the hydraulic pressure to be increased to the hydraulic motor system so as to maintain the predefined constant pulling force of the motor. Conversely, when the angular position of the tension plate has adjusted downward and toward the drum axis (indicating decreased wound thickness of the cable), the control system causes the hydraulic pressure to be decreased to the hydraulic motor system so as to maintain the predefined constant pulling force of the motor.
It will be appreciated that the graphs of
Variations on the above embodiments may be employed. For example, in the described embodiments above a complete tensioner system, which maintains tension on the winch cable, is employed. Although such complete tensioner systems are common, they are not present in all winches and are not need for purposes of the present invention to measure position. The tension plate may be provided to measure position, even if a complete tensioner system to maintain tension on the winch cable is not otherwise provided. In this regard, in the above embodiments the tension plate is biased by the spring. In another exemplary embodiment, the tension plate passively maintains its position against the winch cable under gravity and/or with structural guides, but otherwise without the additional spring bias. In addition, multiple tension plates may be provided for positioning measurement. In one embodiment, a second tension plate is provided adjacent the rope inlet, with or without a spring bias.
Furthermore, sensors other than position sensors may be employed. As referenced above, without the described control the pulling force on the rope changes as the winch cable is wound or unwound. In exemplary embodiments, therefore, the sensor directly measures the load on the winch cable to provide the basis for control of the motor pressure. For example, the sensor may be a strain gauge that measures the load on the winch cable at the location where the cable winds about/unwinds from the winch drum.
In addition, the above embodiments were described principally with respect to utilizing a hydraulic motor to drive the winch. Comparable control however, may be applied to other types of motors, such as electrical motors and other suitable motors as are known in the art. Generally, the motor “pressure”, e.g., hydraulic pressure, electrical current, etc. depending on the type of motor, is controlled based on the degree of winding of the winch cable or rope about the winch drum. For example, when the winch motor is an electrical winch motor, the control system is configured to control the electrical current applied to the electrical winch motor to achieve the constant pulling force on the winch cable based on the degree of winding sensed by the sensor. Specifically, when the degree of winding increases, the control system increases the electrical current applied to the electrical winch motor to maintain the predefined constant pulling force, and when the degree of winding decreases, the control system decreases the electrical current applied to the electrical winch motor to maintain the predefined constant pulling force.
With reference to
While the winch 110 is being operated with only the bottom layer L1 of cable or rope wrapped around the drum, the tensioner arm 116 is in contact with the microswitch 118 keeping the normally open switch open (i.e., at the L1 position of switch 118 in
As the rope or cable is stored on layers L2 and higher, the tensioner arm 116 is out of contact with the switch 118 closing the switch 118 contact (i.e., at the L2 position of switch 118 in
According to an alternative embodiment, as shown in
With reference to
Accordingly, the above described algorithm prevents the motor 152 from being operated at a current that would exceed the winches rated pulling force. In addition, the algorithm accounts for the number of layers of cable on the drum to very the current appropriately to provide a constant pulling force for the winch without exceeding the rated pulling force.
Although the invention has been shown and described with respect to certain preferred embodiments, it is understood that equivalents and modifications will occur to others skilled in the art upon the reading and understanding of the specification. The present invention includes all such equivalents and modifications, and is limited only by the scope of the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/707,335, filed on Sep. 28, 2012 and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/777,637, filed on Mar. 21, 2013. The entire disclosures of each of the above applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2683020 | Nickle | Jul 1954 | A |
2916227 | Bowen, Jr. | Dec 1959 | A |
2974216 | Inoue | Mar 1961 | A |
3208729 | Townsen | Sep 1965 | A |
3293899 | Terras | Dec 1966 | A |
3330154 | Habern | Jul 1967 | A |
3677520 | Koomey | Jul 1972 | A |
3801071 | Barron | Apr 1974 | A |
3871714 | Behrend | Mar 1975 | A |
3938595 | Swenson | Feb 1976 | A |
3959608 | Finlayson | May 1976 | A |
3982710 | Teumer | Sep 1976 | A |
4005852 | Schmitmeyer | Feb 1977 | A |
4022391 | Stein | May 1977 | A |
4132387 | Somerville | Jan 1979 | A |
4175727 | Clarke | Nov 1979 | A |
4177731 | Kleist | Dec 1979 | A |
4278365 | Sandberg | Jul 1981 | A |
4284253 | Uribe | Aug 1981 | A |
4424939 | Ohashi | Jan 1984 | A |
4448394 | LeMoine | May 1984 | A |
4475163 | Chandler | Oct 1984 | A |
4537364 | Pollman et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4624450 | Christison | Nov 1986 | A |
4708301 | Kataoka | Nov 1987 | A |
4854547 | Oliphant | Aug 1989 | A |
4898336 | Reist | Feb 1990 | A |
4928925 | Christison | May 1990 | A |
RE33240 | Lothamer | Jun 1990 | E |
4953829 | Knaack | Sep 1990 | A |
5007599 | Forsyth | Apr 1991 | A |
5161749 | Badiali | Nov 1992 | A |
5209414 | Clemens | May 1993 | A |
5295664 | Kamper | Mar 1994 | A |
5310125 | Kitamura | May 1994 | A |
5551644 | Linderoth | Sep 1996 | A |
5806781 | Ujita | Sep 1998 | A |
5992203 | Chubb | Nov 1999 | A |
6012707 | Enlund | Jan 2000 | A |
6030496 | Baggot | Feb 2000 | A |
6079576 | Bosler | Jun 2000 | A |
6085957 | Zinniel | Jul 2000 | A |
6135421 | Bartelme | Oct 2000 | A |
6286629 | Saunders | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6347462 | Steinich | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6354158 | Eidem | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6372065 | Tabuchi | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6523806 | Bartal | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6629663 | Bettendorf | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6659386 | Rienas | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6811112 | Currie | Nov 2004 | B1 |
7063306 | Sanders | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7090200 | Morse | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7104214 | Niebur | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7410116 | Planck | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7543798 | Cunningham | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7568650 | Barker | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7789374 | Averill | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7866630 | Ueki | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7883450 | Hidler | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7967234 | Baugh | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8141260 | Pellen | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8403302 | Erel | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8613426 | Holland | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8909379 | Fisher | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9243965 | Williams | Jan 2016 | B2 |
20010054667 | Komatsu | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020117654 | Bartal | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20070089925 | Addleman | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080061276 | Averill | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20100051767 | Erel | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20110044599 | Kowalczyk | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110049286 | Harada | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20120168397 | Lim | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130195596 | Brenny | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140027429 | Chantry | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140109682 | Mupdende | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140264209 | Lin | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140306829 | Pereira | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150034757 | Bixler | Feb 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101229907 | Jul 2008 | CN |
101261170 | Sep 2008 | CN |
201296616 | Aug 2009 | CN |
11079680 | Mar 1999 | JP |
2009126613 | Jun 2009 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140091268 A1 | Apr 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61707335 | Sep 2012 | US | |
61777637 | Mar 2013 | US |