The subject of the invention is a constant velocity joint. The invention deals with transfer of rotations and torque from one shaft to another in a way that rotations and angular velocity at the input and output shaft are still the same with various values of angle, which both shafts may form together. The condition of equal angular velocities represents a basic condition for classification of a joint as a constant velocity joint. The invention relates to so-called fixed type of a constant velocity joint, where each shaft has a fixed position considering the joint central point, and cannot move in axial direction along its axis.
The problem of mutual connection of two rotating shafts in a way that energy and rotations are transferred from one shaft to another is encountered in engineering industry practically from its origin. Mutual position of shafts may vary, and adequate solutions for mutual connection of shafts exist for their various positions.
One of the most common situations is a situation, where the axis of a driving (input) shaft intersects in one point the axis of a driven (output) shaft, the angle between both axes of shafts is variable during operation and shafts cannot move in direction from or to the centre of a joint. A typical example of such type of connection is a constant velocity joint in the front axle of a vehicle with front drive, which connects the shaft of the front wheel with a half-axle protruding from the vehicle gear.
The first usable type of this kind of connection of two shafts was apparently a joint of an Italian inventor, Girolamo Cardano, in the 16th century, and its enhancement by Robert Hook in the 17th century. Universal joints, based on ideas of these two early-modern period scientists, are used by now, especially in agricultural machines, trucks, etc. Disadvantage of such designed joints consists in fact that angular velocity at the output shaft differs from angular velocity at output cyclically during each rotation, and it depends on mutual angle of shafts. The condition of equal angular velocities with this solution can be met in a way that both joints placed one after another are used so that the angle of the input shaft and joint axis is still the same as the angle of joint axis and the output shaft. In practice, however, it is a problem to achieve equal angles, and therefore, such types of joints are used only in applications, where homokineticity is not a critical characteristic.
The most frequently used type of a constant velocity joint is at present most probably a joint of so-called Rzeppa-type or “Ball-Type CV joint” (where CV stands for constant velocity). Most present solutions are more or less based on patents U.S. Pat. No. 1,665,280 of 1927, U.S. Pat. No. 1,916,442 of 1929, U.S. Pat. No. 2,010,899 of 1933 or other patents of the same author.
The arrangement of this type of a joint is generally based on six balls, which roll in paths with semicircular cross section, formed at outer ball surface of the input shaft and lie in planes crossing the shaft axis. The output shaft has a similar grooves formed, but located in inner surface of ball cavity of the output shaft. Each ball touches both the groove on the inner shaft and the groove on the outer shaft. The very important part of this joint is a massive metal cage, which is to keep centres of balls in a homokinetic plane. At one moment each ball touches the path on the inner shaft, on the outer shaft, and some of faces of openings placed on the massive cage. The big disadvantage of this type of a joint is the fact that entire loading transferred by the joint is actually transferred only by contact between the ball and outer and inner rolling path. Considering the small amount of balls, the tension in contact places is very high, and its size significantly limits maximum transferred performance and life of the entire joint. Rolling of balls in paths has not only rolling nature, but each ball has to turn around the axis, which is perpendicular to the shaft axis. Slipping of ball toward paths occurs, from which friction results. Another place where friction arises is in a place of contact of the ball and the cage, where only sliding friction always arises. The rate of sliding friction in this type of a joint is rather high, and shows mainly in considerable production of heat with bigger angles of joint tilting. The cage is inevitable for this type. The joint would not be able to work without it. Its homokineticity depends on quality of the cage and quality of its placing in this joint. And whereas the cage has to have a certain clearance, the joint of this type is not 100 percent homokinetic then. Another big disadvantage of this type of a joint is its zero tolerance to axial forces. The joint is not able to transfer any axial loading. The production of the joint is demanding, as it requires special machines for production and grinding of rolling paths in the cavity of ball shape.
Apart from above mentioned types of joints a big amount of more or less homokinetic solutions have been developed, which did not make the right at all or are used very rarely. These include, for instance, Tracta-type joints, represented, for instance, by the document FR 652829, Bendix-Weiss-type joints, represented, for instance, by the document DE 1 800 012, and the like.
A new principle and technical solution of a constant velocity joint, which differs from commonly used solutions, is the substance of the invention. The aim of the invention is to eliminate main shortcomings of known solutions, and to create a simple, reliable, and truly constant velocity joint.
According to this invention the constant velocity joint consists of the input and output shaft and several pairs of spherical arms. Nodes for rotation attachment of a spherical arm are provided at each shaft. Each shaft bears as many rotation nodes (bearings) as many pairs of spherical arms are used in the joint. The axis, around which each attached spherical arm can rotate, forms with the axis of the shaft an angle and passes through the central point of the joint—the homokinetic point (
A stabilising mechanism of the joint of the presented invention is placed in the space between the input and output shaft and consists of an equal number of segments as there is number of pairs of spherical arms. Each stabilising segment is rotationally connected to one pair of spherical arms so that the common rotational axis of spherical arms intersects the common rotational axis of stabilising segments. The common rotational axis of each pair of spherical arms attempts to depart from the homokinetic plane when rotating the input shaft to the output shaft. If segments would not be tied to each other, each stabilising segment would change its position relative to the homokinetic plane along with a pair of spherical arms. However, if all stabilising segments are connected so that all degrees of freedom are restricted leaving them only the possibility of mutual rotation around a single axis, then all common rotational axes of pairs of spherical arms are locked in the single plane. And since each spherical arm on one side of the homokinetic plane has the same angular length (i.e. the angle γ between two rotation axes is the same at each arm) as the other spherical arms on the other side of the homokinetic plane, the common rotational axis of spherical arms will lie always in the homokinetic plane and mutual rotation Φ of both shafts will not be possible. The joint designed so will be then homokinetic. At mutual offset of shafts by angle α, changes of angles η11, η12, and η13 occur, which are formed by stabilising segments (
Each pair of spherical arms of the joint described by now has one common rotational axis, which was firmly fixed to one of segments of a stabilising device. To achieve the desired effect of stabilising of position of spherical arms to the homokinetic plane, it is not absolutely essential that each pair of spherical arms has one common rotational axis. It is therefore not essential that the rotational axis of the spherical arm lies directly in the homokinetic plane, but it is absolutely necessary to achieve that the angle formed by the rotational axis of spherical arm with the homokinetic plane is constant. The assumption, used in the joint arrangment, enables to create a joint dimensionally more efficient than in the previous case. In such designed joint, each stabilising segment bears instead of one common rotational axis for both arms two separate rotational axes.
By now, all joints were described, in which all rotational axes ran through one common point—a central point of the joint. In the first case, rotational axes of both arms were coaxial and lied directly in the homokinetic plane, and in the second case, rotational axes of two arms intersected each other in a central point of the joint, and each was inclined from the homokinetic plane by a fixed angle. It is possible to create a joint, when rotational axes of two spherical arms do not intersect at all. The arrangment of this type of the joint is almost identical with the previous joint, with the difference that each stabilising segment carries two rotational axes for attachment of spherical arms, which, however, do not intersect at one point, but are parallel. Each rotational axis for attachment of the spherical arm intersects the rotational axis of the stabilising segment in one point. Such designed joint has then two central points of the joint and also two homokinetic planes. It is also possible to create functional joints, in which rotational axes of spherical arms, carried by the stabilising mechanism, are intersected under the axis of the stabilising mechanism or above the same.
For joints with the number of pairs of spherical arms more than three regularities are the same as in previously described arrangements with three pairs of spherical arms. An important criterion is a relative position of spherical arms in each pair. As already described above, rotational axes of a pair of arms may be coaxial, they may intersect each other in the central point of the joint, they may be parallel and not intersect at all, or they may intersect each other, but their intersection does not lie in the axis of the stabilising mechanism.
From an economic and design point of view it would be interesting to reduce the number of pairs of spherical arms only to two. Number of arms on each of the shafts would be also reduced to two, as well as the number of segments of the stabilising mechanism. The joint designed in this way is not stabilised, because it does not prevent mutual rotation of the input and output shaft. It is necessary to add an extra feature to this design of the joint, which was not necessary with joints with number of pairs of spherical arms three or more. With joints with number of pairs of spherical arms three and more the stabilising effect of the stabilising mechanism manifests in a way that in each pair of stabilising arms one arm forms with the homokinetic plane the same angle as the other arm of the pair forms with the plane. It could be said that the homokinetic plane simulates a mirror - the position of spherical arms on one side of the homokinetic plane is the mirror image of the position of spherical arms on the other side of the homokinetic plane. Therefore, it is necessary to add the function of mirror position of spherical arms relative to the homokinetic plane into the joint with number of pairs of spherical arms equal to two. This means that movement of one spherical arm of the pair must be proportionally sychronised with the movement of the second spherical arm of the same pair. The angle ε1, by which one spherical arm of the pair is departed from the homokinetic plane, has to have the same size as the angle ε2, by which the other spherical arm of the same pair departs from the homokinetic plane. There are many technical designs that are capable to ensure a mirror and proportional movement of two bodies. With this joint it is preferred to use a gear with gear ratio 1:1 so that the toothing will be directly integrated or tightly coupled with spherical arms in the place, where both spherical arms of the same pair are closest to each other. In
According to mutual position and arrangement of spherical arms and segments of the stabilising mechanism, also a joint with two pairs of spherical arms can be made as a joint, where rotational axes of the pair of arms may be coaxial, they can intersect in the central point of the joint, they may be parallel and do not intersect at all, or they may intersect each other, but their intersection does not lie on the axis of the stabilising mechanism.
The main advantage of a constant velocity joint according to this invention is simplicity of shape of its individual parts and low production costs, especially compared to today, perhaps the most widespread joints of so-called Rzeppa-type or “Ball-Type CVJ”. In contrast to this approach, the joint according to this invention is truly homokinetic, it is able to bear axial loads, and there are no nodes with sliding friction. A significantly higher efficiency of this new joint and significantly higher lifetime can be expected. Considerably higher dimension of tilt angle of shafts, which can be several times higher than it is normal at present, is another significant advantage, compared to today's most widespread concept.
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
It is understood that the individual embodiments of the constant velocity joint according to the present invention are shown by way of illustration only and not as limitations. Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able to ascertain using no more than routine experimentation, many equivalents to the specific embodiments of the invention. Such equivalents are intended to be encompassed by the following claims. Those skilled in the art would have no problem dimensioning the constant velocity joint and choosing suitable materials and design configurations, which is why these features were not designed in detail.
Example No. 1 of the embodiment of the invention is shown in
On arms of the input shaft 1 there are rotating nodes 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 formed with regular spacing considering the axes of the shaft al and on arms of the output shaft 2 there are rotating nodes 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3 formed with regular spacing considering the axes of the shaft a2. These rotating nodes are represented by circular openings, the axes of which on the input shaft 1 represent axes of rotating nodes a1.1, a1.2 and a1.3 and the axes of openings on the output shaft 2 represent axes of rotating nodes a2.1, a2.2 and a2.3 (
Example No. 2 of the embodiment of the invention is shown in
Example No. 3 of the embodiment of the invention is shown in
Example No. 4 of the embodiment of the invention is shown in
Example No. 5 of the embodiment of the invention is shown in
Example No. 6 of the embodiment of the invention is shown in
On the input shaft 1 and output shaft 2 there are two arms, where rotating nodes (1.1, 1.2 and 2.1, 2.2 are located, represented by openings, containing outer rolling paths of radial-axial bearings. The axis of each rolling path and thus radial-axial bearing points to the homokinetic point of the joint. Rolling elements 9 are inserted into each rolling path of both shafts. Shafts are connected with the rest of the joint by bolts 7, anchored into spurs on spherical arms.
Example No. 7 of implementation of the invention is shown in
Since constant velocity joints often work in an environment, which is unfavourable to rolling bearings, it will be necessary to protect the constant velocity joint against dust, water penetration or other impurities. Sensitive parts of the joint may be covered with a shape-flexible cap of elastic material in form as now common in other types of constant velocity joints. It is also possible to protect each rotation node separately with a rubber or plastic seals commonly used in engineering practice.
A field of application of constant velocity joints with a fixed centre point is very wide. This new type of the joint is to be used mainly in passenger cars with front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive, in trucks and buses, rolling stock, fuel systems of helicopters, shipbuilding, etc. This type of the joint can also be used as a replacement of a bevel gear in crankshafts in wind or water power stations or in designing of other machines. In general, this type of the joint may be used wherever there is a requirement to combine two shafts intersecting in one point and forming a variable or constant angle between their axes so that the angular velocity and rotation of one shaft is at every moment the same as angular velocity and rotation of the second shaft.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PP 63-2011 | Jun 2011 | SK | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/SK2012/050010 | 6/25/2012 | WO | 00 | 12/24/2013 |