The present invention relates to the construction of interior works. More particularly, the invention is concerned with any construction method, involving flat prefabricated elements, especially boards, and at least one joint-pointing coat which can be used especially for the finishing of a joint. The flat prefabricated elements comprise a plaster board and at least one sheet of lining paper, at least one outer layer of which has a visible outer face ready to be decorated. The said flat elements are assembled together, especially with a coat, and the joints are finished with the said joint-pointing coat, so as to obtain an overall visible outer surface which is relatively uniform or plane, including in the region of the joints. Such a method is employed, for example, when plasterboards covered with a cardboard lining having a joint-pointing coat are assembled, for the purpose of defining spaces within a building, especially partitions.
According to the document EP-A-0,521,804, the lining paper may comprise an upper layer, called an upper web, comprising white cellulose fibres, mainly synthetic, and a mineral filler of light colour, preferably white, and a pigment layer covering the upper layer, comprising a mineral filler of light colour, preferably white, and a binder.
In general the overall visible outer surface obtained according to the above-defined method needs to be prepared, before receiving any surface decoration, such as one or more layers of a film covering of the paint or lacquer type or a wallpaper. This preparation is necessitated especially by the shade or colour differences existing between the visible outer surface of the flat prefabricated elements, for example plasterboards, and the visible outer surface of the joints. After the interior work has been completed, this preparation involves covering the overall surface obtained, i.e. the lining of the flat prefabricated elements plus the joints, with one or more layers of a paint or priming or finishing coat.
The preparation operation represents an appreciable additional cost, for example in a complete process for the construction of a building. And in some cases, it is still insufficient for obtaining an overall decorated surface of uniform appearance, particularly in view of the physico-mechanical differences prevailing between the joints and the flat prefabricated elements.
The object of the present invention is to overcome the abovementioned disadvantages. More specifically, the object of the invention is a construction method breaking with the traditional approach adopted for solving the problem explained above, that is to say avoiding the need for a preparation of the overall surface, before any decoration. However, the object of the invention is a method which remains compatible with the practices of the professionals in the construction industry, especially those involved in interior works.
According to the present invention, the method differs from the traditional approach in that, the structure and/or composition of the sheet of lining paper and the composition of the joint-pointing coat are coordinated with one another in order, in the dry state of the joint-pointing coat, to obtain an overall surface having one or more physical characteristics, including colour or shade, which are substantially homogeneous in virtually the entire overall surface, including in the region of the visible outer face of the joints.
According to other objects of the invention a construction assembly for interior works is provided, comprising, flat prefabricated elements, especially boards, and, a joint-pointing coat capable of being used especially for the finishing of a joint. The flat prefabricated elements comprise a plaster body and at least one sheet of lining paper, at least one outer layer of which has a visible outer face ready to be decorated. In this assembly, the structure and/or composition of the sheet of lining paper and the composition of the joint-pointing coat are coordinated with one another in order, in the dry state of the joint-pointing coat, to obtain an overall surface having one or more physical characteristics, including colour or shade, which are substantially homogeneous in virtually the entire overall surface, including in the region of the visible outer face of the joints.
A joint-pointing coat, intended to be used in the method or the assembly according to the invention, is also provided.
The present invention affords the following decisive advantages which result from the surface homogeneity of the overall surface obtained according to the present invention, not only in terms of colour or shade, but also in terms of particular physical or physico-chemical characteristics.
Thus, by homogenizing the surface absorption capacity of the lining paper and of the joint-pointing coat, a virtually perfect appearance of the paint layer or paint layers and a virtually uniform adhesion of a wallpaper can be obtained. This subsequently is conducive to the homogeneous detachment of the wallpaper.
In a preferred version of the invention, there is a sealing coat intended for forming essentially the joints between the various flat elements, with the joint-pointing coat being a finishing coat which can be applied to the sealing coat.
According to an advantageous embodiment of the invention, when there are preexisting flat prefabricated elements, the composition of the joint-pointing coat is coordinated with the structure and/or composition of the sheet of lining paper.
According to another version of the invention, and converse to the foregoing, for a preexisting joint-pointing coat, the composition of the sheet of lining paper is coordinated with the composition of the joint-pointing coat.
Moreover, the method is more preferably characterized in that, in addition to the colour or shade, at least any one of the following physical characteristics is homogenized or matched between flat prefabricated elements and the joint-pointing coat, namely:
Advantageously, these various physical characteristics are defined as follows:
In practice, and by means of routine tests, the average person skilled in the art knows how to coordinate the structure and/or composition of a sheet of lining paper and/or the composition of a coat, so as to satisfy the above-defined technical principles. As a result, the examples described below are in no way limiting.
The present invention will now be described by taking flat prefabricated elements, plasterboards, as an example. These boards are typically composed of a factory-cast plaster body between two sheets of paper forming both its lining and its reinforcement.
Conventionally, one of the sheets of paper used for making the plasterboards has a dark colour which can vary between a grey colour and a chestnut colour, since it is composed of cellulose fibres which have not undergone any particular purifying treatment. Traditionally, this so-called grey paper is obtained from unbleached chemical pulp and/or from mechanical pulp, and/or from thermomechanical pulp and/or from semi-chemical pulp. By mechanical pulp, it is usually meant a pulp obtained entirely by mechanical means from various raw materials, essentially wood, which can be provided by salvaged products originating from wood, such as old cardboard boxes, trimmings of kraft paper and/or old newspapers. Thermomechanical pulp means a pulp obtained by thermal treatment followed by a mechanical treatment of the raw material. By semi-chemical pulp is meant a pulp obtained by eliminating some of the non-cellulose components from the raw material by means of chemical treatment and requiring a subsequent mechanical treatment in order to disperse the fibres.
The other sheet of plasterboards has a visible face, called a lining face, of a colour generally lighter than the grey sheet. To obtain this lighter colour, the layer or layers of this face are based on chemical pulp, if appropriately bleached, composed of recycled and/or new cellulose fibres, and/or on mechanical pulp, if appropriately bleached. By chemical pulp is meant a pulp obtained by eliminating a very large proportion of the non-cellulose components from the raw material by chemical treatment, for example, by cooking in the presence of suitable chemical agents, such as soda or bisulphites. When this chemical treatment is completed by bleaching, a large part of the coloured substances is eliminated, as well as the substances which risk decomposing by ageing and giving unpleasant yellow shades associated with the presence of, for example, lignin.
In a preferred embodiment of the method of the invention, and according to the document EP-A-0 521 804, the content of which is incorporated by reference, the lining paper comprises an upper layer, called an upper web, comprising white cellulose fibres, mainly synthetic, a mineral filler of light colour, preferably white, and a pigment layer covering the upper layer. The pigment layer comprises a mineral filler of light colour, preferably white, and a binder. Correspondingly, according to the present invention, the joint-pointing coat comprises a mineral filler of light colour, preferably white, the grain size of which is between 5 and 35 μm.
The fineness of the grain size of the mineral filler of the joint-pointing coat makes it possible to obtain a smooth surface corresponding to that of the lining of the board. Too large a grain size of the filler gives rise to overall surface defects, such as a reflection of light radiation on the surface of the coat which is different from that on the surface of the board, bringing about differences in tone and brightness of the shade. Too large a grain size also gives rise to differences in physical appearance which are associated with the differences in roughness between the board and the coat.
The mineral filler represents preferably between 50% and 85% of the total weight of the joint-pointing coat.
Moreover, the coat can comprise a hydrophobic agent, for example between 0.2% and 5%, and preferably between 0.5% and 3%, of the total weight of the coat, for example a silicone derivative. This agent slows the drying kinetics of the coat, which is conducive to the non-cracking of the coat. Also, this agent has higher resistance to the attack of steam during operations for the removal of wallpaper, so that the removal can be achieved without thereby impairing the good bonding of a paint or paper adhesive on the overall surface, including the visible surface of the joints. In fact, this hydrophobic agent makes it possible to level off the absorbent capacities of the surfaces of the coat and of the lining paper of the board. Thus, all paints or paper adhesives applied to the overall surface obtained exhibit little shift in absorption kinetics between the coat and the board, thus making it possible to avoid the appearance of spectra or of defects in shade homogeneity.
The coat also comprises an organic binder dispersible in aqueous phase, in a proportion of between 1 and 20%, and preferably between 2 and 12%, of the total weight of the joint-pointing coat, for example polyvinyl acetates and/or acrylic acid esters. The choice of this binder is important, since it must impart sufficient flexibility to the coat to withstand mechanical stresses, and it must have both an adhesive capacity for obtaining a good bond on the overall surface and good resistance to the attacks of UV light.
Moreover, a handling agent is provided in the composition of the coat, especially a water-retaining and thickening agent, for example methylhydroxyethyl-cellulose, in a proportion of 1 to 15%, and preferably of 2 to 12%, of the total weight of the joint-pointing coat.
Finally, at least one slipping agent can be included in the composition of the coat, especially a clay, in the proportion of 0.1 to 2%, and preferably of 0.1 to 0.6%, of the total weight of the joint-pointing coat. These clays are preferably silicate derivatives and more preferably clays of the attapulgite type.
Other components, such as biocides, dispersants, anti-foaming agents and pigments can also be incorporated in the composition of the coat in the conventional way.
The invention will be understood better from the following detailed example given as a non-limiting indication.
We proceed from plasterboards similar to Example 5 of document EP-A-0 521 804, which are assembled by means of a conventional sealing joint, for example a joint coat sold under the registered trade mark of “PREGYLYS”® of the Company PLATRES LAFARGE. The upper web of the lining of the board is obtained from 65% bleached synthetic cellulose fibres and 35% talcum and is covered with a pigment layer comprising, as mineral filler, 85% by weight of CaSO4, 2H2 in the form of needles of a length of between 3 and 5 μm and, as a binder, 10.3% by weight of styrene-butadiene copolymer. The sealing joint subsequently receives a thin layer of a joint-pointing coat according to the invention, having the following composition:
The weight percentages given are in relation to the total weight of the coat, unless indicated otherwise.
For comparison requirements, standard boards conforming solely to French standard NF P 72-302 and not comprising the above-defined upper web and pigment layer are assembled by means of a joint coat for a plasterboard of the range of coats “PREGYLYS”®, sold by the Company PLATRES LAFARGE.
The characteristics of the two overall surfaces thus formed are compared by applying the following tests:
The results of the tests (A) and (B) are collated in Table I and those of the test (C) are collated in Table II below.
This shows that the overall surface according to the present invention is clearly more homogeneous than that of an assembly according to the conventional technique. Moreover, the more homogeneous absorption time of the overall surface makes it possible to use a paint having less covering capacity than that necessary with traditional boards and coats and is also beneficial to the painting operation.
This table shows that the colour deviation before exposure to UV is much slighter for an overall surface according to the invention than for an overall surface such as is obtained traditionally.
This table also shows that the change in the colour deviation after exposure to UV is much less pronounced in the overall surface according to the invention than traditionally. In fact, the colour deviation before exposure and after exposure must be as little as possible, so that the overall surface does not give the impression to the naked eye of being spotted or being covered with zones of different shade and brightness.
This is not possible with an overall surface obtained by means of traditional plasterboards and products, but the very slight deviation of the overall surface according to the invention makes it possible to mitigate this disadvantage.
Although only preferred embodiments are specifically illustrated and described herein, it will be appreciated that many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings and within the purview of the appended claims without departing from the spirit and intended scope of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
95 08153 | Jun 1995 | FR | national |
This is a continuation of Ser. No. 10/308,084 filed Dec. 3, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,208,225, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 09/633,264 filed Aug. 4, 2000, now abandoned, which is continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/316,013, filed May 21, 1999 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,105,325, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/793,444, filed May 9, 1997 now abandoned, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1439289 | Buttress | Dec 1922 | A |
1993472 | Borsari-Fischer | Mar 1935 | A |
2109719 | Brusse | Mar 1938 | A |
2205423 | Lefebure | Jun 1940 | A |
2754795 | Enssle | Jul 1956 | A |
2770216 | Schock | Nov 1956 | A |
2833139 | Bosshard | May 1958 | A |
2925631 | Larson et al. | Feb 1960 | A |
3003979 | Ptasienski et al. | Oct 1961 | A |
3180058 | Tillisch et al. | Apr 1965 | A |
3256223 | Heijmer | Jun 1966 | A |
3284980 | Dinkel | Nov 1966 | A |
3303147 | Elden | Feb 1967 | A |
3382119 | Henkel | May 1968 | A |
3411926 | Gogek et al. | Nov 1968 | A |
3422587 | Murray | Jan 1969 | A |
3576091 | Shull, Jr. | Apr 1971 | A |
3630742 | Crawford et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
3708935 | Kossuth et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3819395 | Yocum | Jun 1974 | A |
3835074 | Desmarais | Sep 1974 | A |
3907725 | Forte et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3975320 | Lane et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
3984596 | Failmezger | Oct 1976 | A |
4018732 | Lakshmanan | Apr 1977 | A |
4020237 | von Hazmburg | Apr 1977 | A |
4117183 | Long | Sep 1978 | A |
4178273 | Brown | Dec 1979 | A |
4205041 | Hymes | May 1980 | A |
4238239 | Brown | Dec 1980 | A |
4287103 | Green et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4294622 | Brown | Oct 1981 | A |
4372814 | Johnstone et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4448639 | Long | May 1984 | A |
4454267 | Williams | Jun 1984 | A |
4558079 | Desmarais | Dec 1985 | A |
4579610 | Kole et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4657594 | Struss | Apr 1987 | A |
4661164 | Severinghaus, Jr. | Apr 1987 | A |
4672787 | Murphy | Jun 1987 | A |
4686253 | Struss et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4720303 | Soldatos | Jan 1988 | A |
4725477 | Kole et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4743475 | Negri et al. | May 1988 | A |
4820754 | Negri et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4845152 | Palmer | Jul 1989 | A |
4859248 | Thaler et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4959272 | Long | Sep 1990 | A |
4965031 | Conroy | Oct 1990 | A |
4972013 | Koltisko et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4988543 | Houle et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5019195 | Skinner | May 1991 | A |
5039341 | Meyer | Aug 1991 | A |
5055323 | Kole et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5079042 | Frings | Jan 1992 | A |
5088260 | Barton et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5102462 | Podlas | Apr 1992 | A |
5143757 | Skinner | Sep 1992 | A |
5207830 | Cowan et al. | May 1993 | A |
5230200 | Douglas et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5258069 | Knechtel et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5277712 | McInnis | Jan 1994 | A |
5334243 | Hyman | Aug 1994 | A |
5336318 | Attard et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5487250 | Yount et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5552187 | Green et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5653797 | Patel | Aug 1997 | A |
5714032 | Ainsley et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5746822 | Espinoza et al. | May 1998 | A |
5779786 | Patel | Jul 1998 | A |
5869166 | Caldwell | Feb 1999 | A |
5908521 | Ainsley et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5908821 | Labeque et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5922447 | Baig | Jul 1999 | A |
5945198 | Deodhar et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5987835 | Santarossa | Nov 1999 | A |
6077966 | Matsumura et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6105325 | Zuber et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6106607 | Be et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6165261 | Wantling | Dec 2000 | A |
6171388 | Jobbins | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177180 | Bodine et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6221521 | Lynn et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6238476 | Sprinkle | May 2001 | B1 |
6268042 | Baig | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6436185 | Ayambem et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6645291 | Ayambem et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6663979 | Deodhar et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6673144 | Immordino et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6733581 | Langford | May 2004 | B2 |
7047701 | Bonetto et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
20020086114 | Madsen | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020121326 | Adler et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030084633 | Zuber et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030085306 | John et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030113572 | Deodhar et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030153651 | Bonetto et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040154264 | Colbert | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040209074 | Randall et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040237436 | Zuber et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050065256 | Kyte et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050229519 | Colbert et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234174 | Colbert et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246993 | Colbert et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050252128 | Colbert et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060048684 | Bonetto et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1932292 | Jan 1993 | AU |
719427 | May 2000 | AU |
2259115 | Aug 1999 | CA |
142 872 | Jul 1980 | DE |
37 21 668 | Jan 1989 | DE |
37 21 668 | May 1989 | DE |
43 24 315 | Oct 1994 | DE |
4331141 | Mar 1995 | DE |
0 521 804 | Jun 1992 | EP |
0 496 682 | Jul 1992 | EP |
0496682 | Jul 1992 | EP |
0 521 804 | Jul 1993 | EP |
1 182 235 | Feb 2002 | EP |
2166536 | Aug 1973 | FR |
2 505 908 | Mar 1982 | FR |
2 736 079 | Mar 1997 | FR |
2736079 | Mar 1997 | FR |
2818635 | Jun 2002 | FR |
2818968 | Jul 2002 | FR |
1513763 | Jun 1978 | GB |
2228931 | Sep 1990 | GB |
60-065197 | Apr 1985 | JP |
09-109131 | Apr 1997 | JP |
9702395 | Jan 1997 | WO |
9908979 | Feb 1999 | WO |
9948833 | Sep 1999 | WO |
9957371 | Nov 1999 | WO |
0006518 | Feb 2000 | WO |
0206183 | Jan 2002 | WO |
0212144 | Feb 2002 | WO |
02012144 | Feb 2002 | WO |
02058902 | Aug 2002 | WO |
2005040475 | May 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040216424 A1 | Nov 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10308084 | Dec 2002 | US |
Child | 10857504 | US | |
Parent | 09633264 | Aug 2000 | US |
Child | 10308084 | US | |
Parent | 09316013 | May 1999 | US |
Child | 09633264 | US | |
Parent | 08793444 | May 1997 | US |
Child | 09316013 | US |