This is a national phase application in the U.S. based on international application No. PCT/FR2003/000921 first filed on Mar. 24, 2003 and for which priority is claimed.
The present invention relates to the field of cables used in building for participating in the structure of certain civil engineering constructions.
It is aimed more particularly at arrangements of such cables which give them good properties in the event of an earthquake.
The invention is especially applicable to the stay cables used for suspending portions of the construction, such as bridge decks. In a current embodiment, such a stay cable comprises a bundle of parallel reinforcements extending between two anchoring zones, one arranged on a pylon of the construction and the other on the suspended part. In the anchoring zone, the individual reinforcements of the stay cable have a slight divergence, so that they can be locked individually.
When a stayed construction experiences an earthquake, the suspended part, for example the bridge deck, undergoes abrupt and potentially considerable displacements with respect to the pylons. This results in high variations in traction and in flexion in the stay cables.
The flexural stresses are reflected in the anchoring zones and risk damaging the reinforcements and/or the anchoring devices.
The document WO 00/75453 describes an anchoring device for a structure cable, such as a stay cable, provided with guide means comprising an individual guide duct for each reinforcement, this duct widening in the direction of the running part of the cable, so as to allow an angular deviation of the reinforcement. The advantage of this anchoring device is that it ensures a progressive take-up of the flexural forces attributable to the convergence of the reinforcements toward the running part or of some transverse actions experienced by the stay cable. However, this force take-up may prove insufficient in the presence of the violent stress variations undergone in the event of an earthquake.
An object of the present invention is to propose an arrangement making it possible for the structure cables and for the constructions of which they form part to withstand the high stresses occurring in the event of an earthquake.
The invention thus proposes a civil engineering structure cable, comprising:
According to the invention, the structure cable comprises at least one guide member which is in closely set contact around the set of reinforcements and which has an inner surface, the cross section of which is adapted to the peripheral shape of the parallel bundle and the longitudinal section of which has a convex curvature which, over the length of the guide member, allows angular deflections of the reinforcements which are substantially greater than the maximum angle of convergence of the reinforcements between the anchoring device and the running part of the cable.
The form of the guide member allows it absorb high angular deflections of the set of reinforcements, with a controlled radius of curvature in order to avoid damaging the reinforcements and the anchoring device.
In preferred embodiments of the cable according to the invention:
Another aspect of the present invention relates to a guide member for a structure cable, as defined above. This member has a tubular general shape, with an inner surface to be applied in closely set contact around a set of traction reinforcements, the set of reinforcements converging between an anchoring device and a running part of the cable where the reinforcements are gathered into a parallel bundle which is more compact than at the anchoring device, said inner surface having a cross section adapted to the peripheral shape of said bundle and a longitudinal section having a convex curvature which, over the length of the guide member, allows angular deflections of the reinforcements which are substantially greater than the maximum angle of convergence of the reinforcements between the anchoring device and the running part of the cable. Said inner surface preferably has a hexagonal or circular cross section.
The invention is described below, without this being limiting, with regard to a structure cable consisting of a bridge stay cable.
A cable stayed bridge is illustrated diagrammatically in
The stay cable 2 comprises a set of traction reinforcements 10 which, in the example considered, consist of metal strands, each covered with an individual plastic sheath. In the running part of the stay cable, said running part extending over the greatest part of its course between the deck and the pylon, the strands 10 are gathered into a compact parallel bundle. The transverse arrangement of the strands 10 in the running part is, for example, that illustrated in
To form this compact bundle of strands, a deviating collar 11, arranged at a distance from the anchoring device 4, is closely set around the set of strands in order to cause them to converge.
The anchoring device 4 comprises a metal block 15 illustrated in cross section in
The individual sheath of the strands 10 is interrupted in a chamber 17 at the rear of the anchoring block 15. The residual gaps in the block and the chamber 17 are filled with a corrosion protection material, such as a grease. A sealing system 18, for example of the stuffing box type, as described in European patent 0 323 285, closes the chamber 17 opposite the block 15 by forming a seal around the individual sheaths of the strands 10. The anchoring device 4 may also comprise ducts for the individual guidance of the strands, as described in the document WO 00/75453, which widen in the direction of the running part of the cable, so as to allow an angular deviation of the individual strands.
The anchoring device 4 bears longitudinally against a tube 20 connected to the structure of the deck 1 or of the pylon 3, in order to transmit the tractive force in the stay cable.
The stay cable illustrated in
The stay cable thus equipped has some capacity for allowing overall displacements of the strands with respect to the structure. The lever arm between the exit of the anchoring device 4 and the collar 11 gives the damper 21 a certain transverse stroke which allows angular movements, preferably in conjunction with the ducts for the individual guidance of the strands, said ducts being present at the exit of the anchorage. These angular movements have a limited amplitude, typically to approximately 25 milliradians. Greater deflections would risk damaging the strands by imparting an excessive curvature to them at the anchoring device.
However, the angular deflections occurring in the event of an earthquake may be much higher. In order nonetheless to give the stay cable according to the invention earthquake protection properties, a guide member 30 is installed between the anchoring device 4 and the collar 11 and before the strands 10 are put in place.
This guide member 30 is of cylindrical general shape. As shown in
The inner surface 32 of the guide member 30 is in closely set contact around the strands, once they are installed. The cross section of this inner surface 32, as can be seen in
Since the member 30 is located in an intermediate position between the anchorage 4 and the collar 11, the strands 10 have, in the region of said member, a spacing corresponding to a fraction of that which they have in the anchoring block 15. In order to position them accurately, at the same time ensuring good bearing contact on the guide member 30, and to prevent them from becoming disorganized in the event of abrupt flexural stresses, inserts are seated within the member 30 together with the set of strands 10, 12. These inserts may consist of individual plastic sleeves 13, into which that part of the strands 10, 12 which passes through the member 30 is threaded. A stop plate 35 is placed at the back of the anchoring device 4, to prevent this device from being disturbed by the ends of the sleeves 13 or of the dummy strands 12.
If it is not necessary for the strands to have maximum compactness in the running part of the stay cable, the cross section of the inner surface 32 of the guide member 30 may also be circular.
The longitudinal section of the inner surface 32 of the member 30 is illustrated in
This take-up of pronounced angular deflections is carried out with a controlled radius of curvature, in order to avoid excessive flexural stresses on the strands at the exit from the anchorage. This radius of curvature R of the longitudinal section of the inner surface 32 of the member 30 is advantageously at least 3 meters in the rear portion of the member, where it is in closely set contact around the set of strands. In an embodiment with strands having a diameter of 15.7 mm, the radius of curvature R in this rear portion will typically be 4 meters.
This radius of curvature R may be constant over the length L of the member 30. In this case, the angular defection in radians allowed by the member 30 is α≈tg α=L/R. The length L may therefore be of the order of 40 cm for R=4 m and α=100 milliradians.
To reduce the overall size of the guide member 30, its inner surface 32 may be formed in such a way that the radius of curvature of its longitudinal section decreases from the rear portion, where the member is in closely set contact around the strands 10, toward the running part of the stay cable. This is possible, without too great a risk of damaging the strands, since the greatest angular deflections in the event of an earthquake tend to occur when the axial stress on the stay cable is not very high: it may thus be assumed that a strand subjected to less axial stress follows a slightly more closely set curvature. The smallest radius of curvature, at the front end of the member 30, is, for example, of the order of 2.5 meters.
In a particularly advantageous embodiment, the guide member 30 is mounted in a floating manner with respect to the anchorage 4. It can thus be seen, in
The floating guide member 30 is, in principle, held longitudinally, since it is in closely set contact around the set of strands. To prevent it from nevertheless undergoing appreciable displacements, it may be prolonged axially by means of spacers 33, 34, for example of tubular shape, which butt respectively on the damper 21 and on the stop plate 35 in the event of longitudinal movements.
An earthquake gives rise to abrupt variations in moment of flexion in the anchoring zones of the stay cables. These abrupt variations are poorly filtered by the damper 21. This risks resulting in serious damage to the anchoring zone, especially to the tube 20, requiring major repairs, along with the dismantling of the anchorage and even of the stay cable. To limit this risk, there is advantageously provision for the connection between the tube 20 and the support 22 of the damper to be designed to break when said connection is subjected to a force exceeding a predefined threshold.
In the example illustrated in
The possible break of these bolts 40 is relatively minor, since they are easily replaced.
It will be understood that the exemplary embodiment which has just been described does not limit the scope of the invention and that numerous variants may be made to it. In particular, a guide member 30, as described above, may be located in the region of a top anchorage, toward the pylon. It may, on the other hand, be installed, without any device for damping vibrations on the stay cable.
On the other hand, the guide member 30 may belong to the means for deviating the reinforcements, which ensure that the latter converge into a compact bundle. It may, in particular, be substituted for the collar 11 shown in
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR03/00921 | 3/24/2003 | WO | 00 | 3/8/2005 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2004/094730 | 11/4/2004 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4068963 | Brandestini | Jan 1978 | A |
4557007 | Daiguji et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4633540 | Jungwirth et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4718965 | Finsterwalder et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
5173982 | Lovett et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
6301735 | Jartoux et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6523207 | Stubler et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6560807 | Stubler et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6578329 | Stubler et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6658684 | Stubler et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6715176 | Stubler et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6748708 | Fuzier et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
20020028112 | Paulshus et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020108329 | Bournand et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030086755 | Stubler et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030110583 | Stubler et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040111987 | Paulshus et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2340484 | Sep 1977 | FR |
2592666 | Jul 1987 | FR |
2003147902 | May 2003 | JP |
WO0075453 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 2057560 | Jul 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050252675 A1 | Nov 2005 | US |