Patent Grant
10975551
The present invention relates to a construction machine.
In recent years, attention is being focused on an information-based construction technique which utilizes electronic information obtained from the construction/production processes including a survey, design, construction, supervision/inspection, and maintenance/management on construction project to realize a high efficiency and high accuracy construction. In the information-based construction technique, the electronic information obtained through construction is utilized in other processes, thus aiming to achieve an improvement in terms of productivity and securing of high quality in the whole construction production process.
For example, Patent Document 1 discloses a precision construction support system in which the construction object is imaginarily divided into a plurality of three-dimensional blocks, in which the positional coordinates of the three-dimensional blocks are used as a reference and related to the construction object information to provide a plurality of information units. Based on the information units, there is prepared three-dimensional topographic information, and the three-dimensional topographic information, the positional information on a loading machine and a transportation machine, and operational information are synthesized and analyzed before being displayed on a monitor screen. In this system, in the case where the distance between the loading machine and the transportation machine is smaller than a predetermined value and where the dwell time of the transportation machine is longer than a predetermined time, the material loaded on the loading machine is identified, and a dug-out earth amount for each material is calculated and displayed on the monitor screen.
Patent Document 1: JP 3687850 B2
The prediction of each construction work by the construction machine is important from the viewpoint of construction management. According to the information-based construction technique, there is utilized three-dimensional design data prepared based on the current survey topographical data and design alignment/vertical-alignment/section data, whereby it is possible to measure the banking/cutting amount and slope face area. The banking/cutting amount and slope face area serve as a standard for the work amount, and can constitute a basis for construction time prediction.
The introduction of a construction management system utilizing three-dimensional design data, however, is not to be regarded as easy. For example, it is necessary to previously provide three-dimensional design data prepared based on the current survey topographical data and design alignment/vertical-alignment/section data, and the preparation of the three-dimensional design data takes cost and time. Further, even it is possible to measure the banking/cutting amount and slope face area, it is not easy to predict the requisite time for the completion of the construction based solely on the banking/cutting amount and slope face area since the construction work by a construction machine is wide-ranging, and the processing speed differs from work to work.
The present invention has been made based on what has been discussed above. It is an object of the present invention to make it possible to compute the construction completion prediction time for a construction machine by a simple system configuration.
The present application includes a plurality of means for solving the above problem, an example of which is a construction machine including: a multi-joint type work device operating in a plane orthogonal to a width direction of the work device; and a display device displaying a construction target surface formed through work by the work device, and a forward end position of the work device with respect to the construction target surface on a screen. There is provided a controller that calculates a work amount based on positions of the construction target surface and a current surface in a coordinate system set in the plane, and on a distance by which a construction target surface and a current surface of configurations equivalent to those of the construction target surface and the current surface continue on a construction object, and that calculates a predicted requisite time of the work amount of a work based on the work amount and processing speed of the work device. The display device displays the predicted requisite time calculated by the controller or a prediction time calculated from the predicted requisite time.
According to the present invention, it is possible to compute and display the banking/cutting amount and construction completion prediction time based on the current survey topographical data and design alignment/vertical-alignment/section data without having to prepare three-dimensional design data.
In the following, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. To be described will be an embodiment in which a construction time prediction system according to the present invention is mounted in a hydraulic excavator.
An upper swing structure 20 is composed of a swing frame 21, an engine 22 as a prime mover provided on the swing frame 21, a swing mechanism 23 for swing-driving the upper swing structure 20 (swing frame 21) with respect to the lower track structure 10 by the driving force of a swing hydraulic motor 24, a cab on which an operator gets to perform operation (operation chamber), etc.
Mounted on the upper swing structure 20 is a multi-joint type front work device 30 composed of a boom 31, a boom cylinder 32 for driving the boom 31, an arm 33 rotatably supported at a portion in the vicinity of the forward end portion of the boom 31, an arm cylinder 34 for driving the arm 33, a bucket 35 rotatably supported at the forward end of the arm 33, a bucket cylinder 36 for driving the bucket 35. The boom 31, the arm 33, and the bucket 35, which are the main components of the front work device 30, operates in a plane orthogonal to the width direction of the front work device 30. The plane passes the center in the width direction of the front work device 30. In the plane, there are set an excavator reference coordinate system (UV coordinate system) and a set coordinate system (xy coordinate system). The plane is sometimes also referred to as the operational plane of the front work device 30.
Mounted on the swing frame 21 of the upper swing structure 20 are a hydraulic pump 41 generating a hydraulic pressure for driving hydraulic actuators such as a traveling hydraulic motor 13, a swing hydraulic motor 24, a boom cylinder 32, an arm cylinder 34, and a bucket cylinder 36, and a hydraulic system 40 including a control valve (not shown) for drive-controlling the actuators. The hydraulic pump 41 constituting the hydraulic fluid source is driven by the engine 22.
Mounted on the front work device 30 and the upper swing structure 20 are a boom angle sensor 51 mounted to the boom 31 in order to detect the posture of the excavator (in particular, the claw tip position of the bucket 35) and detecting a boom angle α, an arm angle sensor 52 mounted to an arm pin and detecting an arm angle β, a machine body inclination sensor 53 mounted to the upper swing structure 20 and detecting the inclination angle θ of the upper swing structure 20 with respect to a reference surface (for example, a horizontal surface), and a bucket stroke sensor 54 for detecting a bucket angle γ from the expansion/contraction of the bucket cylinder 36. Each angle sensor can be replaced by a stroke sensor, and the stroke sensor can be replaced by an angle sensor. Instead of the angle sensor or the stroke sensor, it is also possible to use an inclination angle sensor or an inertial measurement device.
A claw tip position computing section 62 computes the claw tip position (the posture of the work device 30) in the excavator reference coordinate system based on the output of the angle sensors 51 and 52, the inclination sensor 53, the stroke sensor 54, and the inclination sensor 53. The posture of the work device 30 can be defined based on the excavator reference coordinate system of
The inclination angle of the boom 31 with respect to the U-axis is the boom angle α, the inclination angle of the arm 33 with respect to the boom is the arm angle β, and the inclination angle of the bucket claw tip with respect to the arm is the bucket angle γ. The inclination angle of the upper swing structure 20 with respect to the horizontal surface (reference surface) is the inclination angle θ. The boom angle α is detected by the boom angle sensor 51, the arm angle β is detected by the arm angle sensor 52, the bucket angle γ is detected by the bucket stroke sensor 54, and the inclination angle θ is detected by the machine body inclination sensor 53. The boom angle α is maximum when the boom 31 is raised to the maximum (highest) degree (when the boom cylinder 32 is at the stroke end in the raising direction, that is, when the boom cylinder length is maximum), and is minimum when the boom 31 is lowered to minimum (the lowest) (when the boom cylinder 32 is at the stroke end in the lowering direction, that is, when the boom cylinder length is minimum). The arm angle β is minimum when the arm cylinder length is minimum, and is maximum when the arm cylinder length is maximum. The bucket angle γ is minimum when the bucket cylinder length is minimum (in the state of
In the present embodiment, apart from the excavator reference coordinate system, there is used the set coordinate system. Like the excavator reference coordinate system, the set coordinate system is a coordinate system fixed with respect to the hydraulic excavator (upper swing structure 20), and uses the claw tip position (reference point) of the bucket 35 when the input device 69 including an operation switch described below is depressed as the origin. In the set coordinate system, the y-axis is set in the vertical direction of the upper swing structure 20, and the x-axis is set in the horizontal direction thereof. Arbitrary coordinates in the excavator reference coordinate system can be transformed into coordinates in the set coordinate system, and the reverse is also true.
Mounted in the cab are an operation lever (operation device) 70, a gate lock lever 71, an input device 69, a display device 67, a communication device 68, and an information controller 60 (see
The operation lever 70 is used to operate each of the traveling hydraulic motor 13, the swing hydraulic motor 24, the boom cylinder 32, the arm cylinder 34, and the bucket cylinder 36, and outputs an operation signal in accordance with the operation amount the operational direction. The lock lever (also referred to as the gate lock lever) 71 is installed at the boarding gate of the cab. When the lever 71 is erected at the time of boarding, an operation signal output from the operation lever 70 is interrupted, and when the lever 72 is laid down, the operation signal is output.
The input device 69 consists of an operation switch, a numeric key pad, a touch panel, etc. This makes it possible to input various items of information from the operator to the information controller 60. The communication device 68 is a device for performing transmission/reception of information to/from an external computer. For example, a radio communication device constitutes this.
The display device 67 is, for example, a liquid crystal monitor on which various items of information related to the hydraulic excavator and the work are displayed. For example, based on the position of the construction target surface computed by a surface computing section 63 and the position of the bucket 35 computed by a claw tip position computing section 62, there are displayed on the display device 67 the construction target surface and the position of the bucket forward end position with respect to the construction target surface as shown in
Next, the information controller 60 will be described.
Based on the signals from the input device 69, the set information input section 61 serves to transmit various items of set information necessary for the calculation of the work amount to the sections where the items of information are required. The set information includes the position of a reference point (the position of the origin of the set coordinate system), the distance from the reference point in the y-axis direction of the set coordinate system to the construction target surface (in the following, it is sometimes referred to as the “depth D from the reference point” or “the depth D”), the angle ∅ of the construction target surface with respect to the y-axis, and the construction distance L (the distance by which the equivalent construction target surface and the current surface continue on the construction object).
The claw tip position computing section 62 computes the claw tip position of the bucket 35. Input to the claw tip position computing section 62 are the signals from the angle sensors 51 and 52, the bucket stroke sensor 54, the machine body inclination sensor 53 mounted on the front work device 30 and the upper swing structure 20, and the claw tip position determination signal from the set information input section 61. Based on these, the claw tip position of the bucket 35 is computed.
The surface computing section 63 computes the positions of the construction target surface and the current surface in the set coordinate system. The position of the construction target surface can be computed from the position of the reference point O, the depth D of the construction target surface input from the set information input section 61, and the angle ∅. The position of the current surface can be computed from the positions of two or more points on the current surface (the points P1 and P2 in the example of
The earth amount estimating section 64 computes the work amount. The positional information on the construction target surface and the current surface computed by the surface computing section 63, and information on the construction distance L from the set information input section 61 are input to the earth amount estimating section 64. Based thereon, the estimated volume of the construction object (estimated earth amount) is computed, and the volume is regarded as the work amount.
The construction time measurement/storage section 65 stores the processing speed (work processing speed) at which the work is performed by the front work device 30. The work processing speed is the requisite time per predetermined work amount (earth amount) with respect to the work that can be conducted by the front work device 30. For example, in the following description, the excavation time per unit earth amount is the work processing speed.
The construction time computing section 66 computes the predicted requisite time (which may be referred to as “the construction completion prediction time) of the work related to the work amount calculated by the earth amount estimating section 64. The earth amount estimated by the earth amount estimating section 64 and the work processing speed of the front work device 30 stored in the construction time measurement/storage section 65 are input to the construction time computing section 66, and, based on these, the construction completion prediction time is computed. For example, the construction completion prediction time may be a value obtained by multiplying the work amount of the earth amount estimating section 64 (estimated earth amount) by the work processing speed.
In the computation of the construction completion prediction time, it is also possible to utilize the non-operation time of the front work device 30 that is computed from at least one of the signal of the operation lever 70 for conducting the operation, swinging, and traveling of the front work device 30 and the signal of the lock lever 71 ON/OFF-switch-controlling the signal of the operation lever 70. The non-operation time can be calculated from the accumulation value of the time during which there is no signal output from the operation lever 70, or the accumulation value of the time during which the lock lever 71 is at the switching position turning OFF the signal of the operation lever 70 (lock position). The non-operation time is added to the construction completion prediction time, and the construction completion prediction time is corrected, whereby it is possible to improve the accuracy in the construction completion prediction time.
The above set information and computation result are displayed on the display device (for example, the monitor in the cab) 67. Further, they are transmitted via the communication device 68 to a management system performing construction management and the like.
More specifically, there is displayed on the display device 67 the predicted requisite time (prediction time taken until the construction completion) computed by the construction time computing section 66, or the prediction time calculated from the predicted requisite time (construction completion prediction time) as the prediction time information.
As a result, based on the construction completion prediction time transmitted from each machine body operating at the work site, it is possible to estimate the requisite construction completion time and to manage the progress of the construction or the like.
As the procedures for displaying the construction completion prediction time in the construction time prediction system of the present embodiment, the following three procedures are required: 1. definition of the work amount, 2. work processing speed, and 3. calculation and display of the construction completion prediction time. In the following, each procedure will be described.
(1-1) Definition of the Work Amount
Here, the work amount means the amount of earth excavated. In the following, a method of estimating the earth amount excavated will be described. The claw tip position of the bucket 35 is computed as a relative position from the reference point O. It is computed as a point on the xy-plane (set coordinate system) having the reference point O as the origin, the x-axis that is in the front-rear direction of the excavator horizontal plane, and the y-axis that in the vertical direction in a vertical plane.
First, the operator adjusts the claw tip of the bucket 35 at the position constituting the reference point O, and inputs the setting signal through the input device 69 to thereby set the reference point O. As a result, a set coordinate system is set in the excavator.
Further, the operator sets the construction target surface. The construction target surface is determined by the depth D from the reference point O input to the set information input section 61 from the input device 69, and the surface computing section 63 to which the angle ø of the construction target surface is input.
Further, the operator determines the current surface. The current surface can be determined by adjusting the claw tip of the bucket 35 to the ground before construction, and gaining the coordinates of two or more points in the set coordinate system on the ground. For example, in the case of a face-of-slope construction in a landform as shown in
Further, the operator determines the construction distance L. The construction distance L is a distance, for the construction object, by which a construction target surface and a current surface of equivalent configuration to the previously determined construction target surface and current surface continue. The construction distance L may be referred to as the width of a construction object of an equivalent configuration. The construction distance L can be determined by the operator by inputting it to the set information input section 61 via the input device 69. In this case, the construction distance L is determined by man including the determination of whether or not the sectional configuration of the construction object is “equivalent.”
The earth amount estimating section 64 determines the earth amount from the information on the construction target surface and the current surface and the construction distance L. The earth amount can be calculated by multiplying the integral value of the difference between the current surface and the construction target surface by the construction distance L. In performing the integration, there are respectively obtained the x value of the first point and the second point, the intersection of the current surface and the adjacent current surface in the case where there are a plurality of current surfaces, the intersection of the construction target surface and the height of the first point, the intersection of the construction target surface and the height of the second point, and the intersection of the construction target surface and the current surface. In the range of the x value of the first point and the second point, the x values are arranged in ascending order or descending order, and the integration is performed in each range. The start point and the end point of integration are respectively substituted into the related surface formulas, and the integration is performed by subtracting the formula at least one y value of which is small from the formula at least one y value of which is large. The sum total of the calculated integral values expresses the area of the earth amount in which construction is performed in the xy-plane (the set coordinate system), and the earth amount (work amount) can be calculated by multiplying this by the construction distance.
In the following, it is to be assumed that the construction of the construction object is performed, with the lower track structure 10 moving parallel to the straight line determining the construction distance L. In some cases, the plane (operational plane) in which the front work device 30 can operate, with the upper swing structure 20 and the lower track structure 10 being at rest, is referred to as the unit plane. By multiplying the area of the earth amount in which construction is performed in the xy-plane (the set coordinate system) calculated by the earth amount estimating section 64 by the width of the bucket 35, it is possible to calculate the earth amount per unit plane. Further, by dividing the excavation time per unit plane by the earth amount per unit plane, it is possible to calculate the work processing speed.
(1-2) Work Processing Speed
In the present embodiment, the construction time measurement/storage section 65 calculates the work processing speed based on the excavation time per unit plane (predicted requisite time of the work). In measuring the excavation time per unit plane, the trigger for excavation start is first input at the start of the excavation of the unit plane after the completion of the calculation of the earth amount by the earth amount estimating section 64, thus starting the measurement of the excavation time. After this, at the point in time when the excavation of the unit plane is completed, the excavation completion trigger is input, thus completing the measurement of the excavation time. From the excavation time measured and the earth amount per unit plane, it is possible to calculate the excavation time per unit earth amount, that is, the work processing speed.
It is advisable for the excavation work start/completion trigger to be input, for example, from the input device 69. Further, when the excavation work is started, the cylinder pressure of the hydraulic cylinder (e.g., the arm cylinder 34) increases. Thus, the fact that the cylinder pressure has become not less than a predetermined value may serve as the excavation work start trigger. When the excavation work of a certain unit plane has been completed, the machine travels a little to perform positional adjustment before resuming the excavation work on another unit plane. Thus, the input of the traveling operation via the operation lever 70 may serve as the excavation work completion trigger. Further, in the case where work has been executed on a similar work site, the work processing speed is stored in the construction time measurement/storage section 65 for each work site and the work, and selection is performed in conformity with the work site and the work, whereby the work processing speed measurement may be omitted.
Further, the progress of the work may be estimated from the set construction distance L and the excavator movement distance. Here, the excavator movement distance may be measured based on the change in the excavator position obtained from a GNSS (global navigation satellite system) including a GPS, or it may be obtained through estimation of the movement distance by the traveling operation from the work start.
The information controller 60 updates the work processing speed based on the requisite time for the completion of the construction of a predetermined work amount after the construction start by the front work device 30, and it is possible to calculate the predicted requisite time again from the work processing speed after the updating and the remaining work amount. This helps to achieve an improvement in terms of prediction accuracy for the predicted requisite time as well as the progress of the work.
For example, based on the progress of the work estimated as described above and the time that has elapsed from the work start, the work processing speed is updated as appropriate during the work, whereby it is possible to compute a more accurate processing speed. Further, based on the judgment by the operator or the information controller 60 or a command from the exterior, the excavation time per unit plane may be recalculated during the excavation work of a certain excavation object, thereby updating the work processing speed. Here, an example of the updating of the work processing speed by the construction time measurement/storage section 65 will be described with reference to the flowchart of
In
In step 3, it is determined whether there is no input by the operation lever 70 or whether or not the lock lever 71 is at the lock position. When it is determined there is no input by the operation lever 70, or that the lock lever 71 is at the lock position (Yes in step 3), the procedure advances to step 4, where the time measurement is interrupted. When it is determined that there is input by the operation lever 70, and that the lock lever 71 is at the release position (the switching position where the signal of the operation lever 70 is turned ON) (No in step 3), the procedure advances to step 5, where the time measurement is continued or resumed. In the case where the time measurement is not interrupted at the pint in time of step 5, it is possible to continue the measurement as it is.
In step 6, it is determined whether or not the excavation work of the certain unit plane has been completed based on the excavation work completion trigger. The determination may be made through input from the input device 69, or may be made based on the fact that traveling operation has been input. When it is determined that the excavation work is complete (Yes in step 6), the time measurement is completed in step 7. In step 8, the processing speed is calculated based on the measurement time and the unit plane work amount of step 7, and, in step 9, the processing speed is updated to complete this flowchart.
On the other hand, when it is determined in step 6 that the excavation work is to be continued (No in step 6), the time measurement is continued, and the procedure returns to step 3.
In this way, the time measurement is continued until the completion of the excavation work. In the manner as described above, the excavation time is measured while actually performing the excavation work, and the result is reflected, whereby it is possible to calculate a more accurate processing speed. In the case where the processing speed is updated, the construction completion prediction time is recalculated based on the processing speed after the updating and the remaining work amount, and the prediction time information on the display device 67 is updated. The remaining work amount can be grasped, for example, by the above-mentioned work progress situation. That is, there is calculated the proportion of the value obtained by subtracting the excavator movement distance from the construction distance L to the construction distance L, and this is multiplied by the total work amount, whereby it is possible to grasp the remaining work amount.
(1-3) Calculation/Display of the Construction Completion Prediction Time
The construction completion prediction time can be calculated by multiplying the estimated earth amount by the excavation time per unit earth amount. The construction completion prediction time is used for the calculation of the prediction time information displayed on the display device 67. As the prediction time information, the prediction time taken until the construction completion may be displayed, or the construction completion prediction time obtained by adding the prediction time until the construction completion to the current time may be displayed.
When displaying the prediction time information, it is possible to display a time obtained through computation with a previously set break time added thereto. The construction completion prediction time starts countdown after the completion of setting or the work start time. In the case where no work is being performed, the countdown is stopped. More specifically, in the time during which the operation lever 70 is being operated, or in the case where the lock lever 71 is at the lock position, it is determined that no work is being conducted, and the countdown is stopped. In the case where setting is made so as to display the construction completion time, the time during which no work is being conducted is added to the construction completion prediction time, whereby the same result is attained.
Next, a series of processes until the construction completion prediction time (prediction time information) is displayed on the display device 67 in the first embodiment of the present invention will be described. The information controller 60 executes processing at each section in accordance with the flowchart shown in
First, in step 10, it is determined whether or not there is an input to start the construction completion time prediction sequence. In the case where there is no input to start the construction completion time prediction sequence (No in step 10), nothing is done. In the case where there is an input to start the construction completion time prediction sequence (Yes in step 10), the procedure advances to step 11 and from that onward.
In step 11, the reference point O is set. More specifically, the claw tip of the bucket 35 is moved to the reference point O, and there is displayed on the display device 67 a screen requiring the operator of the input to determine the reference point O. When the reference point O is set by the operator, the procedure advances to step 12.
In steps 12 and 13, the construction target surface is determined. More specifically, there is displayed on the display device 67 a screen requiring the operator of the input the depth D and the angle ∅. When the construction target surface is determined by the operator, the procedure advances to step 14.
In steps 14 through 17, the current surface is determined. First, in steps 14 and 15, there is displayed on the display device 67 a screen requiring the operator of the input to determine the first point P1 and the second point P2 on the current surface. When the two points P1 and P2 are determined, the procedure advances to step 16. In step 16, there is displayed on the display device 67 a screen asking the operator if there is the necessity of the input to determine from the third point P3 onward. In the case where there is no need to input from the third point P3 onward, the procedure advances to step 18. On the other hand, in the case where it is necessary to input points from the third point P3 onward, a desired number of points to be input is determined, and then the procedure advances to step 18.
In step 18, the construction distance L is determined. More specifically, there is displayed on the display device 67 a screen requiring the operator of the input of the construction distance L. When the construction distance L is determined by the operator, the procedure advances to step 19.
In step 19, there is displayed on the display device 67 a screen requiring the operator of the input to set the option items to be taken into consideration when the prediction time information (construction completion prediction time) is calculated and displayed in step 23 described later. Examples of the option items include which of the prediction time taken until the construction completion and the construction completion prediction time is to be displayed on the display device 67 as the prediction time information. Further, examples of the option items include whether or not to display the prediction time information taking into consideration the non-operation time (break time) based on the signals from the operation lever 70 and the lock lever 71. When the setting of the option items has been completed, the procedure advances to step 20. It is arbitrary whether or not to set the option items. The procedure may advance to step 20 without performing the setting. In this case, the option items are not reflected in the construction completion prediction time.
In step 20, there is displayed on the display device 67 a screen requiring the operator to select one work processing speed to be used for the computation of the construction completion prediction time in step 23 from among a plurality of work processing speeds stored in the construction time measurement/storage section 65. Examples of the processing speeds stored include the processing speed for each different level of skill of the operator of the construction machine, the processing speed of the work amount of the work that has been performed by the operator and for each actual value of the construction time, and the processing speed for each different work place and work. The processing speed differs for each operator and for each work place and work. When the processing speed can be thus changed for each operator and for each work place and work, it is possible to compute the construction completion prediction time more accurately.
Further, in step 20, there is executed the processing of determining whether or not a processing speed stored in the construction time measurement/storage section 65 has been selected. Here, in the case where it is determined that one has been selected (Yes in step 20), the procedure advances to step 23, and in the case where it is determined that none has been selected (No in step 20), the procedure advances to step 21 to measure the processing speed.
In steps 21 and 22, the processing speed is measured and set. In step 21, there is displayed on the display device 67 a screen requiring the operator to input the excavation work start trigger. When the operator inputs the excavation work start trigger, the processing speed measurement processing is started, and there is displayed on the display device 67 a screen requiring the operator to input the excavation work completion trigger (step 22). Here, as in the case of
In step 23, the earth amount (work amount) is computed, and, based on the earth amount and the processing speed set in step 20 or steps 21 and 22, the construction completion prediction time is computed. Then, the prediction time information computed based on the construction completion prediction time is displayed on the display device 67.
Based on the screen displayed for each step, the operator operates the front work device 30 and performs the value input. As a result, the prediction time information is displayed on step 23. In inputting the set information described above, selection may be made by icons or the like provided in the display device 67. Alternatively, a switch, numeric key pad, and dial may be separately provided on a console in the cab, and the input may be effected by operating them.
As described above, according to the first embodiment, there is provided a construction machine including: a multi-joint type front work device 30 operating in an operational plane orthogonal to the work device width direction (the width direction of the front work device 30); and a display device 67 displaying the positions of a construction target surface and a bucket 35 on a screen. There is provided an information controller 60 which calculates a work amount based on the positions of the construction target surface and the current surface in a set coordinate system set in the operational plane, and a construction distance L by which a construction target surface and a current surface of equivalent configurations to those of the construction target surface and the current surface continue in the construction object, and which calculates the predicted requisite time for the work based on the work amount and the processing speed. The display device 67 displays the predicted requisite time (construction completion prediction time) calculated by the information controller 60 (construction time computing section), or the prediction time calculated from the predicted requisite time.
In the above construction machine, by defining the construction target surface and the current surface in the set coordinate system and inputting the construction distance L, it is possible to calculate/display the volume of the construction object (the earth amount in the case where the construction object is banking/cutting). Further, by setting the processing speed, the requisite time for the construction completion of the construction object (predicted requisite time) can be easily calculated/displayed based on the volume of the construction object and the processing speed. As a result, it is possible for the construction machine at the construction site to compute and display the banking/cutting amount and the construction completion prediction time easily and singly based on the current survey topographical data and the design alignment/vertical-alignment/section data without having to prepare three-dimensional design data.
In particular, in the above example, it is possible to set the construction target surface and the current surface based on the claw tip position of the bucket 35 with respect to the coordinate system (set coordinate system) fixed to the excavator, so that there is no need to prepare the three-dimensional design data, and it is possible to easily estimate the excavation earth amount.
Further, in the above construction machine, the information controller 60 updates the processing speed based on the requisite time for construction completion of a predetermined work amount (e.g., the work amount per unit plane) after the construction start by the front work device 30, and can calculate the predicted requisite time from the processing speed after the updating and the remaining work amount. In particular, in the excavation work by the hydraulic excavator, the work is repeated per unit plane, so that the updating of the processing speed per unit plane is easy. Further, the same work is repeated for each unit plane, so that the operator gets easily accustomed to the work, and an improvement in terms of processing speed is easy to achieve. In view of this, by updating the processing speed based on the time needed for the construction completion of the work amount per unit plane, it is possible to easily achieve an improvement in terms of the accuracy in the predicted requisite time.
Next, the second embodiment of the present invention will be described. The second embodiment is of a structure similar to that of the first embodiment. In the following, the differences will be described.
(2-1) Definition of the Work Amount
In the second embodiment, two work amounts are defined. More specifically, the rough excavation earth amount and the finish excavation earth amount are defined. This is due to the fact that the speed of the excavation at a position far from the target surface (rough excavation) and the speed of the excavation at a position near the target surface (finish excavation) differ from each other owing to the difference in the natures of these excavation works. The method of setting the construction target surface and the current surface is the same as that of the first embodiment.
Here, as shown in
The rough excavation target surface is previously determined to be of a fixed height from the construction target surface, for example, 20 cm, so that the calculation of the finish excavation earth amount may be simplified. That is, by multiplying the length of the construction target surface by the height from the construction target surface, which is 20 cm in this example, the area of the finish excavation earth amount can be simply calculated. By multiplying this by the construction distance, it is possible to calculate the finish earth amount. In the case where the finish excavation earth amount is calculated in this way, the rough excavation earth amount can be calculated by subtracting the finish excavation earth amount from the entire earth amount calculated from the current surface and the construction target surface.
(2-2) Work Processing Speed
In the present embodiment, to conform to the above definition of the work amount, the rough excavation processing speed (rough excavation time per rough excavation earth amount) and the finish excavation processing speed (finish excavation time per finish excavation earth amount) are stored in the construction time measurement/storage section 65. The rough excavation processing speed can be calculated from the average value of the requisite time for a series of rough excavation operations (a series of operations from the rough excavation start to the next rough excavation start via the earth discharge), and the average value of the earth amount loaded in the bucket 35. Similarly, the finish excavation processing speed can be calculated from the average value of the requisite time for a series of finish excavation operations, and the average value of the earth amount loaded in the bucket 35. The amount of earth loaded in the bucket 35 varies depending on the kind of the bucket 35, so that in the case where the bucket 35 is changed, it is desirable to change the set value of the loaded earth amount in accordance with the kind of the bucket 35. Regarding these excavation times, the value for a standard operator may be stored, or a set value may be provided for selection for each level of the years of experience and skill of the operator. Further, it is also possible to measure the time of each of a series of work operations, and to cause the average value to be reflected. This makes it possible to compute a more accurate work processing speed. In this way, in the second embodiment, it is possible to set the work processing speed without executing the measurement of the excavation time per unit plane.
(2-3) Calculation/Display of the Construction Completion Prediction Time
The method of calculating/displaying the construction completion prediction time is similar to that of the first embodiment of the present invention.
Next, a series of processes until the construction completion prediction time (prediction time information) is displayed on the display device 67 in the second embodiment of the present invention will be described. In accordance with the flowchart of
In step 24, which is subsequent to the processing for determining the construction target surface (steps 12 and 13), in order to determine the rough excavation surface, there is displayed on the display device 67 a screen requiring the operator to input the rough excavation height. When the rough excavation surface is determined by the operator, the procedure advances to step 14.
In step 25, there is displayed on the display device 67 a screen requiring the operator to select one work processing speed to be used for the completion of the construction completion prediction time in step 23 from among a plurality of work processing speeds stored in the construction time measurement/storage section 65. As in the first embodiment, when the work processing speed is selected by the operator, there is displayed on the display device 67 a screen requiring the operator to input the option item setting to be taken into consideration when calculating/displaying the prediction time information (construction completion prediction time) in step 23. When the setting of the option items is complete, the procedure advances to step 23. The option item setting is optional. In the case where there is no option item setting, the option items are not reflected in the construction completion prediction time.
As described above, in the second embodiment, the rough excavation earth amount and the finish excavation earth amount are easily estimated. By setting the rough excavation time per unit earth amount and the finish excavation time per unit earth amount, it is possible to compute the construction completion prediction time and to display it on the display device 67. As a result, it is possible for the construction machine on the work site to singly compute and display the banking/cutting amount and the construction completion prediction time.
There is a difference in processing speed between the rough excavation work and the finish work. Further, the two processing speeds vary from operator to operator. For example, depending on the operator, there are cases where the rough excavation work is quicker than the average and where the finish work is slower than the average. Further, the depth of the rough excavation target surface often varies depending on the operator. Thus, it is sometimes difficult to accurately grasp the accurate work progress with the processing speed at the unit plane of the first embodiment alone. However, when, as in the present embodiment, the construction completion prediction time is computed by utilizing the processing speed differing between the rough excavation work and the finish work, it is possible to accurately grasp the work progress.
Next, the third embodiment of the present invention will be described. In the following, the differences of the present embodiment from the first and second embodiment will be described, and a redundant description will be left out.
(3-1) Definition of the Work Amount
As the work amount, in addition to the earth amount of the first embodiment of the present invention, there is utilized the length of the construction target surface in the set coordinate system used when the earth amount is defined. When the angle of the construction target surface is 0°, the length of the construction target surface can be calculated from the difference in the x-coordinate between the first point and the second point on the current surface. When the angle of the construction target surface is 90°, the length of the construction target surface can be calculated from the difference in the y-coordinate between the first point and the second point on the current surface. In the other cases, it can be calculated, in a right-angled triangle the hypotenuse of which constitutes the construction target surface, from the two sides at right angles obtained from the difference between the first point and the second point on the current surface by using the Pythagorean theorem.
(3-2) Work Processing Speed
In the present embodiment, to conform to the above definition of the work amount, the normal excavation processing speed (excavation time per unit earth amount) and the finish surface excavation processing speed (finish time per unit length of the construction target surface) are stored in the construction time measurement/storage section 65. The excavation time per unit earth amount can be calculated from the average value of the requisite time for a series of excavation operations (a series of operations from the excavation start to the next excavation start via the earth discharge), and the average value of the earth amount loaded in the bucket 35. The finish time of the construction target surface per unit length can be calculated from the average value of the requisite time for the finish work of the construction target surface per unit length. Otherwise, the present embodiment is the same as the second embodiment.
(3-3) Calculation/Display of the Construction Completion Prediction Time
The construction completion prediction time can be calculated by adding together the excavation time, which is calculated by multiplying the earth amount by the excavation time per unit earth amount, and the finish time, which is calculated by multiplying the length of the construction target surface by the finish time per unit length. Except for the calculation of the construction completion prediction time, the present embodiment is the same as the first embodiment of the present invention.
Next, to be described will be a series of processes until the construction completion prediction time (prediction time information) is displayed on the display device 67 in the third embodiment of the present invention. The information controller 60 executes processing at each section in accordance with the flowchart shown in
As described above, in the third embodiment, the excavation earth amount and the finish surface length are easily estimated, and the excavation time per earth amount and the finish time per finish surface length are set, whereby it is possible to compute the construction completion prediction time and display it on the display device 67. In particular, in the third embodiment, it is possible to predict the construction completion time without setting the rough excavation target surface as in the second embodiment, or estimating the two earth amounts of the rough excavation earth amount and the finish excavation earth amount.
[Additional Remark]
For the determination of the construction target surface, the angle ø is not always necessary. The determination is also possible in the case where the depths from a plurality of arbitrary points to the construction target surface are known. In this case, the claw tip is moved to each point, and the depth is input in this posture from the input device 69, whereby it is possible to define the construction target surface in the set coordinate system.
In determining the current surface, the points P1 and P2 at both ends of the current surface are input in the above example. This, however, should not be construed restrictively. The determination is possible when two or more points on the surface are input. In this case, setting can be made such that the lower end of the current surface is automatically set at the intersection of the straight line determined by two or more points input through the bucket claw tip and the straight line of the installation surface of the excavator. Further, while in the above example the reference point O, etc. are determined by using the bucket claw tip as the reference (control point), it is also possible to set a point on the bucket 35 other than the claw tip or an arbitrary point including a point on the work device 30 as the control point.
The work processing speed may be updated based on the requisite time for the construction completion of the predetermined work amount after the construction start by the front work device 30. The predicted predetermined time may be calculated from the work processing speed after the updating and the remaining work amount.
In the above examples, there is first set a set coordinate system using an arbitrary point as the origin (reference point O), and the construction target surface and the current surface are set in the coordinate system. The construction target surface and the current surface may be previously set in a coordinate system using a certain point of the work site as the origin (reference point O), and the bucket claw tip may be moved to the certain point to set the coordinate system in the excavator to compute and display the construction completion prediction time.
The processes of the flowcharts of
The earth amount and the construction completion prediction time calculated in the above embodiments may be transmitted to an external computer by a communication device such as a radio communication device mounted in the hydraulic excavator. Further, the calculation of the earth amount and the construction completion prediction time may be conducted through dispersion processing by a plurality of controllers (computers) mounted in the hydraulic excavator, or it may be conducted by an external computer.
While in the above three embodiments the definition of the work amount is conducted on the work site for each construction machine, it is also possible to previously prepare three-dimensional design data based on the current measurement topographical data, and the alignment/vertical-alignment/section data of the design, and to define the work amount. Further, while in the three embodiments of the present invention described above the work processing speed is computed for each construction machine, the work processing speed may be computed on the construction management side from the construction machine operating condition and the work progress, reflecting the computation result in each construction machine.
The present invention is not restricted to the above embodiments but includes various modifications without departing from the scope of the gist of the invention. For example, the present invention is not restricted to a structure equipped with all the components described above in connection with the above embodiments. Part of the components may be deleted. Further, a part of the structure of a certain embodiment may be added to or replace the structure of another embodiment.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2016-182208 | Sep 2016 | JP | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/JP2017/007998 | 2/28/2017 | WO | 00 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2018/051536 | 3/22/2018 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6542514 | Yamada | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 8965642 | Johnson | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 9458597 | Ikegami | Oct 2016 | B2 |
| 10006189 | Kitajima | Jun 2018 | B2 |
| 20030063779 | Wrigley | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20060026101 | Ogura et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20130073143 | Miura | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130158785 | Fukano | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20140100712 | Nomura | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20160129592 | Saboo | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20170328030 | Yamada | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20180218304 | Shike | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2002-108975 | Apr 2002 | JP |
| 2005-011058 | Jan 2005 | JP |
| 3687850 | Aug 2005 | JP |
| 2012-172428 | Sep 2012 | JP |
| 2016121010 | Aug 2016 | WO |
| 2016137017 | Sep 2016 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| International Search Report of PCT/JP2017/007998 dated May 23, 2017. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability received in corresponding International Application No. PCT/JP2017/007998 dated Mar. 28, 2019. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20190017249 A1 | Jan 2019 | US |
