Patent Application
20050033559
The present invention is directed to CAD systems for supporting the design of a machine composed of several structural groups.
Conventional CAD systems include one or several work stations each with at least one input device for inputting a description of the layout of an object to be designed, and each with a display device for showing a representation of the object calculated from the description of the layout. A processor for calculating the representation of the object from the description of the layout can be assigned to a single work station or to several work stations together.
The input of the description of the layouts takes place in steps. The user selects one layout element from a plurality of layout elements offered for selection by the CAD system, and whose graphic representation it is capable of displaying, with the aid of an input device and specifies its position and orientation with respect to the object to be designed, with respect to its size, and also with respect to other parameters, if required.
This working method of conventional CAD systems demands from a design engineer utilizing such a system that he starts his design work with the smallest elements and assembles complex objects step by step from such small units. Such a working method is ill suited to complex design jobs. If it is intended to construct a machine composed of a plurality of structural components, the above-described working method of conventional CAD systems first requires the construction or design of the individual structural components in detail before it is possible to assemble their individual design plans into a plan for construction or designing the entire machine. If difficulties arise in the course of this assembling, it might become necessary to make design changes to the individual structural components. Such changes often entail large amounts of time and cost. Moreover, processing the design plan of the entire machine by the use of such a CAD system requires extremely long times, because the number of the layout elements which must be taken into consideration in the calculation of a graphic representation is extremely large.
Conventional CAD systems attempt to overcome this drawback. In case a very detailed representation of an object to be designed is to be shown, this is simplified by so-called faceting. In the course of this faceting, graphic objects, whose exact graphic representation on a display device requires a large calculating outlay, such as, for example, constantly bent curves, circles, ellipses, etc., are replaced by polygonal progressions in the representation. However, in some cases, this solution is unsatisfactory, since it is not easily possible for a user to determine whether such a polygonal progression lies within or outside of the boundaries of a body which it represents, and therefore a positive statement regarding whether machine elements represented in this simplified way are in engagement in a desired way or are safely spaced apart from each other, is not possible.
A further disadvantage of faceting is that no “real” graphic object corresponds to the polygonal progression visible in the graphic representation which real graphic object could be selected by the user, for example, by pointing with a cursor of a visual display device. While many CAD systems for “real”, i.e. non-simplified graphic objects, support aid functions, such as drawing a perpendicular or laying a tangent at the surface of the object, a check regarding overlap of another object, distance calculations, etc., these functions are not available for a polygonal progression obtained by faceting.
If for these reasons a design engineer selects a detailed representation, he must accept correspondingly long calculating times for generating the representation, even if he is only interested in individual details thereof.
DE 199 59 617 A1 describes a design system for designing new structural components. In this prior system simplified structural space surroundings are made available, which fix the available space for the design of the new structural components. No statement is made regarding the layout of the component to be newly designed, a simplified replacement body of the component in particular does not exist.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,994,989 and DE 199 40 625 A12 form simplified replacement layout elements from complex layout elements for a more rapid representation.
The object of the present invention is directed to the creation of CAD systems for supporting the design of a machine composed of several structural groups.
In accordance with the present invention, this object is attained by the provision of a CAD system for supporting the design of a machine composed of several structural groups. A replacement layout element, which shows the object to be designed in simplified form, is selected. Information regarding the geometry of the object is assigned to this replacement layout. Internal information for designing the object, and external information for connecting it to other objects is also assigned to the replacement layout element. A more detailed object is constructed. A group of layout elements is assigned to each replacement layout element which is filled with layout elements in the course of the design of the structural component.
Because of the possibility provided by this system to selectively represent groups of layout elements either in detail or by the use of a replacement layout element in the course of calculating a graphic representation of the object to be designed, the calculating outlay for calculating a graphic representation can be clearly reduced without it becoming necessary, in connection with an area of the object of special interest, to make cuts in the wealth of data by use of which this area is represented. For example, this system makes it possible for a design engineer, drafting an individual structural component of a compound machine, to observe a detailed representation of his structural component in spatial connection with simplified representations of adjoining structural components. This will allow the design engineer to obtain a quick insight into whether a change made in the design is compatible with the geometric properties of adjoining structural components.
The system in accordance with the present invention preferably supports the assignment of layout elements to a group by the user. This makes it possible for a user to fix the group membership of individual layout elements with respect to taking the layout and mode of functioning of the machine to be designed into consideration and in this way to connect cooperating layout elements, for example, to form a group. These are viewpoints which cannot be easily taken into consideration in case of an automatic assignment by the system, for example from the viewpoint of spatial closeness.
The CAD system supports the assignment of each individual already input layout element to a group by the user for forming a group or to change it. Another possibility, which can be realized in the same CAD system for assigning layout elements to a group, is the opening of the group by a user with the result that layout elements, which are input while the group is open, are automatically assigned to the respective group by the system.
The assignment of a replacement layout element to a group can also be suitably performed by a user. In this way, it is easily possible to give the replacement layout element those layout characteristics which are essential for the interaction of a structural group represented by the replacement layout element with adjoining structural groups. This lets a designer, who is working on a first structural group of a complex machine, to represent only the first structural group in detail, and represent adjoining groups in the form of their replacement layout elements, so that, with short calculating times for the generation of a representation, the designer can still see those details of adjoining structural groups which are relevant for the interaction with the first structural group he is working on.
In accordance with a particularly preferred embodiment of the present invention, the CAD system supports the creation of groups by simply inputting a replacement layout element, or by designating a replacement layout element which had already been input, to be the replacement layout element. This property considerably simplifies the design by use of the top-down method and the work-related design. Thus, it is sufficient to input replacement layout elements, or layout elements, which are later redefined as replacement layout elements, in a first design work step in order to initially roughly fix the layout of a machine to be designed, wherein one replacement layout element can correspond to respective structural groups of the machine. A group of layout elements, which, at the time of the input or of the definition of the replacement layout element, can still be empty, is assigned to each one of these replacement layout elements. In the course of the design of the respective structural group the group is filled with layout elements. In this case, each one of the layout elements input into the group can, in turn, be a replacement layout element for a structural sub-group, or can be defined as such a one in the course of the design process.
In this way, the complete machine can already be represented in its entirety in a rough layout by the use of the replacement layout element at the start of the design work. Thus, it is no longer necessary for all parts to be exactly fixed for being able to represent the spatial arrangement of the complete machine.
The CAD system in accordance with the present invention is particularly suited for implementation as a system having a plurality of work stations. At least one work station is assigned to one of the groups in such a way that the addition, changing or removal of layout elements of the group is possible at this work station, while this is not possible at a work station not assigned to this group. This permits the division of the design of a complex machine into a plurality of partial tasks, each one of which corresponds, from the perspective of the designer, to a structural group of the machine or, from the perspective of the CAD system, to a replacement layout element. An employee charged with the design of the respective structural group can access the layout elements of this structural group, while other employees, who are responsible for other structural groups, or a design leader, can only access this group for reading.
Preferred embodiments of the invention are represented in the drawings and will be described in greater detail in what follows.
Shown are in:
FIGS. 3 to 5, the development of the data structure in the course of the design process, in
FIGS. 8 to 10, a first preferred embodiment of the variation of the data structure in
FIGS. 11 to 13, a second preferred embodiment of the variation of the data structure in
A computer network is represented in
The design work of the individual employees substantially consists of the successive input of objects into the work station computer 01, which are stored in the form of data sets, here called layout elements. Each of the layout elements contains the identification of an object to be inserted into the design, information regarding its position and orientation in relation to a given coordinate system and, if needed, scaling information.
The object of a layout element can be elementary or composite. An object is called elementary if the CAD system has a sub-program for calculating a graphic representation of the object. Elementary objects can be, for example, straight lines, rectangles, ellipses or, in three-dimensional design, simple spatial objects, such as cubes, pyramids, cylinders, ellipsoids, etc. The input of a layout element takes place by selecting the type of an object to be input, such as a straight line, ellipse, etc., by selecting from a menu of objects output by the processor on the display screen and subsequent input of the coordinates of defined points of the selected object.
However, the design work is considerably simplified and made more efficient by the possibility of defining composite layout elements and introducing them in the course of drawing. A composite layout element is defined in that a user inputs a plurality of objects, which can be elementary or themselves also composite, into the work station computer 01, or makes a selection from already input objects, and assigns a name to this group which thereafter, in the same way as the names of the elementary objects, is displayed by the system in a menu of symbols and can be selected by the user.
The first data field “a” of each layout element has the format of a pointer to a memory location in the memory 03. Once the layout element has been put together, the data field “a” actually contains a pointer to that address in the memory 03 where the first of the layout elements is located of which the composite object consists. If the layout element is elementary, the data field “a” can contain a pointer to a sub-program for drawing the elementary object or a numerical value, which does not correspond to a valid address and is representative of the type of the object.
The second data field “b” of each layout element respectively contains information P, O, S regarding the position, orientation and scaling of the object. If necessary, the second data field also contains further parameters, such as line thickness, line pattern, etc.
The third data field “c” respectively contains a pointer to a precursor layout element. No such precursor exists in the case of the first layout element GE1, and the data field “c” has the value NULL; for example in the second layout element GE2 it is a pointer to GE1.
The fourth data field “d” respectively contains a pointer to the subsequent layout element, in the case of GE1 therefore a pointer to GE2.
The fifth data field “e” has no function in an elementary or composite layout element; its task will be explained at a later time.
In the example of
The layout element GE1 is also a composite. In this layout element, the pointer *OBi in the data field “a” does not point to the first layout element GEi1 of the object OBi, but to a data structure which is here called a branch structure and wherein the type information in the data field a has the value *NULL. This value cannot occur in connection with a layout element, it is used by the system as a differentiation characteristic between layout elements and branch structures. The second data field “b” of the branch structure is unused, the third data field “c” contains a pointer *EOBi, and the fourth data field “d” a pointer *GEi1. *GEi1 is a pointer to the first layout element GEi1 of the object OBi. *EOBi is a pointer to a so-called replacement object of the object OBi.
When calculating a graphic representation of the layout element GEi, the value of the fifth data field “e” is evaluated, which can assume two different values, E or ┐E (replacement layout element or not replacement layout element). If the data field “e” has the value ┐E, the system uses the pointer *GEi1 in the data field “d” for drawing the object OBi, and in this way sequentially processes the layout elements GEi1 to GEiN of the object OBi, i.e. the layout element GEi is displayed with all details of the layout elements GEi1 to GEiN of which it is composed.
If the data field “e” of the branch structure GEi has the value E, the replacement object EOBi is drawn in place of the object OBi, which in the present example only consists of a single layout element EGEi 1. But the replacement object EOBi could of course also consist of several layout elements, which are linked by respective pointers pointing to each other in their data fields “c”, “d” in an analog fashion as described above.
Use of the replacement layout elements considerably simplifies the top-down design of a complex object, as well as the work-related design. This will now be explained in a simplified way though use of the example of the design of a printing press.
In a very rough simplification a printing press can be considered to be an arrangement of a plurality of cylinders between two lateral frame plates. Therefore a first stage of the design process of the press can consist in that initially these greatly simplified elements are designed, i.e. the respective layout elements are entered into the memory 03. The result is a memory content as represented in
The data fields a of each one of these layout elements therefore each contain an address value *Zyl, or *Quad, which corresponds to the sub-program of the CAD system for drawing a cylinder or a cube.
Now, for designing a roller in detail, a designer enters a command for creating a new group in the system. Following this, the system deposits layout elements GE31 to GE35, input by the designer, of the group opened in this way, in an area of the memory as data structures linked to each other by pointers, in the same format as the layout elements GE1 to GE5.
After the user has issued a command for closing the group, there are different options for linking the layout elements of the group with the layout elements GE1 to GE5.
Assuming that the group of layout elements GE31 to GE35 are intended to replace the layout element GE3, a first simple option, not represented in a drawing figure, is to replace the pointers *GE3 in the layout elements GE2 and GE4 by *GE31 or *GE35, and to replace the zero pointers of GE31 and GE35 by *GE2 or *GE4. In the graphic representation, this corresponds to a simple substitution of the layout element GE3 by its detailed representation in the form of the layout elements GE31 to GE35.
Another option is that, when closing the group, the user gives it a name, for example “Object1”, and that the system includes this name in a menu of selectable objects to be drawn and assigns it a pointer *GE31 to the first object of the group. In order to permanently include the group GE31 to GE35 in the graphic representation of the design object in place of the layout element GE3 it suffices to replace the pointer *Zyl in the data field “a” of the layout element GE3 by *GE31. This method also permits the replacement of other layout elements from the group GE1 to GE5 by the layout element composed of GE31 to GE35, in that a corresponding change of the pointer in the data field “a” of these other layout elements is performed.
A third option is represented by means of
The data field “e” of the branch data structure contains the statement E/┐E which specifies whether the group GE31 to GE35 of layout elements, or the replacement layout element EGE3, is to be drawn for the layout element GE3. This statement can be changed by a user at any arbitrary time during the design process. This allows a user to make a selection at any time as to whether he would like to view the replacement layout element in a graphic representation, so that in this way he achieves a rapid image buildup, or whether he requires a detailed representation in which the entire group GE31 to GE35 is evaluated.
It is of course possible in the same way as described above to make layout elements of the group GE31 to GE35 into replacement layout elements for a later defined group. A tree-like structure of the design data is achieved in this way in the course of the design process, such as represented in
The data field “e” of the above described data structures makes it possible, by setting the statement E/┐E, to individually determine for each group of layout elements to which a replacement layout element has been assigned whether the graphic representation should be detailed or should only represent the respective replacement layout element.
Another option for fixing the details of the graphic representation is explained by means of
The system offers an option to the user to specify a level, called a resolution level, up to which replacement layout elements, instead of a detailed representation of the graphic representation, are made the basis. This means that if the user specifies the level 1 as the resolution level, the graphic display is generated on the basis of the replacement layout element EGE1, as well as other replacement layout elements present on this level. For displaying the layout elements GE21, GE22, to which no replacement layout element corresponds on the level 1, the tree must be traced to a lower level where, if provided, the calculation of the representation by taking a replacement layout element into consideration can be stopped, or the tree ends with an elementary layout element.
The selection of the resolution level is effective for all layout elements. Therefore, in the case represented, for GE3 the replacement layout element EGE3 present on the level 1 selected as the resolution level is also represented.
If a user wants to have a representation which is more detailed by one level, and therefore selects the level 2 as the resolution level, EGE1 will not be represented. Instead, the group GE11, GE12 of layout elements represented by this replacement layout element is further traced in the tree structure. Thus, for example, the system selects a replacement layout element EGE11 for the layout element GE11 and a group of alternatively representable layout elements GE11, GE112, . . . , on the level 2. The replacement element EGE11 is used for the graphic representation.
Only a replacement layout element EGE12 exists for the layout element EG12 on the level 1; a group of layout elements GE12-1, GE12-2, . . . , represented by this replacement layout element has been placed on a lower hierarchic level z. In principle, this level can be any arbitrary level of the tree structure, but in particular is a lower level in which exclusively elementary layout elements, or references to layout descriptions of standard structural elements are settled in a library. As long as level 2 has been selected as the resolution level, replacement layout element EGE12 settled on the level 2 is represented, the same as with the branch extending from GE11. However, if the user selects a representation which is more detailed by one level, the system tracks the branches extending from GE111, GE112 and checks whether replacement layout elements which could be represented for these elements are present on the level 3 and if so, represents them. However, in the case of the branch extending from GE12, the level 3 is empty. Therefore, in this case the representation of the replacement layout element EGE12 on the level 2 remains, even if the level 3 has been selected as the resolution level.
A first exemplary embodiment of the data structure shown in
In
To this are respectively assigned a first group of internal information for designing the object itself to be designed (i.e. internal information regarding the structural component), and a second group of external information for connecting/inserting the later designed object, or the present replacement layout element (EGE1) with adjoining objects (i.e. interface information regarding adjoining elements).
Internal structural component information can be, for example, information regarding gear wheel sizes and/or information regarding the position and dimensions of the bearing sites. Interface information regarding adjoining elements can be, for example, information regarding the required structural space, the diameters of the bearing bushings, or drilling location information for both lateral walls.
Thereafter, this structural element is stored as a replacement layout element (EGE1). Access to this element containing essential information for designing other structural elements or units, is now already available to other designers. As
This structural element containing the new internal or external information is now stored on the level 2 (
Thereafter the layout elements GE111=basic cylinder body, or GE112=bearer rings, can be available for further processing.
A second exemplary embodiment is represented in FIGS. 11 to 13. As shown in
Following this, the layout element 11, which is represented in
Thereafter, the paper guide roller designed in this way is stored in the form of a replacement layout element EGE1.
Spindles or roller bodies, for example, can then be stored on the next lower level as layout elements G111 or G112.
In accordance with
Now interface information with adjoining elements, such as required structural space, diameter and length of the roller, or the diameter of the bearing, is assigned to this traction roller. Data regarding the position and diameter of the traction rings or regarding the journal dimensions, for example, can be data for the information internal to the structural group.
This structural element is also stored as a replacement layout element EGE12.
It should also be noted that the replacement layout elements EGEi each contain only a portion (basic information) of the geometry information of the later designed detailed object.
The assignment of layout elements or groups of layout elements to a defined level of the tree structure can be arbitrarily made by the user, or it can also be performed in accordance with predetermined rules by the CAD system itself. For example, it can be provided that all layout elements which are elementary or correspond to standard structural elements taken from a library, are settled on a lowermost level of the tree structure. In this manner, they only appear in detail in the graphic representation if either a user selects a representation with maximum detail contents, or if these layout elements of the lowermost level do not belong to a group to which a replacement layout element has been assigned on a higher level.
It can be practical not to assign a replacement layout element on a higher level in particular for those elementary or library layout elements which are important for the connection of structural groups with each other and should therefore be always visible to all users engaged in the design of these structural groups.
In the tree structure in
If the selection of a resolution level is used as the alternative to the use of the data field “e” for establishing the wealth of details in the graphic structure, the data field “e” can be omitted in the data structures of the individual layout elements. However, both methods can also be employed in combination, in which case it must be established which of the two uses has preference over the other. It is particularly practical to give the statement E/┐E preference over the selected resolution level. If in the branch structure of an object the value ┐E is inserted in the data field “e” by a user, the representation of the object by a replacement layout element is prohibited, and it must be shown in detail regardless of the selected resolution level. But if the data field “e” has the value E, the representation of the object by a replacement layout element is permitted, and whether the replacement layout element is actually shown depends on the resolution level selected. If the replacement layout element is located on the selected resolution level, it is represented; if it is located above it, the tree structure on the next lower level will be further traced instead.
In a CAD system with several work stations 01, where several designers need to access the same data (layout elements) regarding a complex object to be designed, the data field “e” of each branch structure preferably contains several bits, each of which is assigned to a work station, so that all work stations can access a single set for read-out independently of each other, while it is yet possible to switch between a detailed representation and a representation of a replacement layout element at each work station independently of the others.
This makes it possible for each designer working at one of the work station computers 01 to set, starting with the layout description in the memory 03 which is uniform for all, a representation on his display screen 07 in accordance with his needs, in which the structural groups relevant to him are shown in detail, while the replacement layout elements for structural groups which are of less importance to him are visible.
In connection with such a multi-station CAD system in particular it can be useful if the data field “a” of a composite layout element can not only contain a pointer to the address of the memory 03, where the description of the composite layout element starts, but alternatively also the identification of a data set of an appropriate content. Making use of the functions of an operating system on which the CAD system is based, this makes the control of the access authorization of the individual work stations to the representations easier. If only a selected one of the work stations is charged with the design of the structural component described in the data set is given the authorization to make entries in a data set, then although the contents of the data set can be read out at all work stations of the system and taken into consideration in the design of the structural components to be designed there, changes in the design of the structural components described in the data set can only be made at the selected one of the work stations.
It is obvious that the above described data structures are only one example among many, by which the essential goal of the invention can be reached. This goal is to be able at any arbitrary time in the course of a design process to determine for any arbitrary structural groups of the design object to which degree of detail these are to be represented. While in the above described example layout elements and branch structures are each stored as coherent data structures in a common memory 03, it can make sense, for example, that the CAD system manages the data fields “a” of the branch structures in the form of data sets which are separated from the remaining layout description. This will make it easier to assure that at each work station computer 01 the data field “e” assigned to it can be read and written, while at other parts of the branch structure it is only permitted to write from the work station computer at which the structural component, of which the branch structure is a part, is being designed.
In what follows, a method for designing a machine composed of several structural groups or objects will be described. First, a replacement layout element (EGEi), which represents the object to be designed in a simplified manner, is determined for at least one object to be designed, information regarding the geometry of the object to be designed are assigned to this replacement layout element (EGEi), and an object of greater detail is designed by means of the replacement layout element (EGEi) and/or its associated information.
Thus, at least one piece of information regarding the geometry of adjacent objects, for example connection dimensions, is assigned to the replacement layout element (EGEi), so that the required structural space, for example, can be assigned. Moreover, at least one diameter value, but preferably two diameter values, can be assigned to the information.
A first group of pieces of internal information for designing the object to be designed itself, and a second group of pieces of external information for connecting/inserting the later designed object, or the present replacement layout element (EGEi) with adjoining objects, are assigned to the replacement layout element (EGEi).
At least one further replacement layout element (EGEi) can be inserted into the replacement layout element (EGEi).
For representation, the replacement layout element (EGEi) can be shown three-dimensionally.
The replacement layout element (EGEi) can be determined to be a rotatory body, wherein at least one diameter value can be assigned to the replacement layout element (EGEi). By means of the diameter value it is possible to design a barrel of the rotatory body at least in part. It is possible by means of a second diameter value which can be assigned to the replacement layout element (EGEi) to design, for example, a journal and/or a bearing site of the rotatory body. It is moreover possible to assign a length to the rotatory body, as well as the position and dimensions of at least one bearing site. A bearing between the replacement layout element (EGEi) and the adjoining object can be described by means of the second diameter value.
A printing press can be designed by means of the replacement layout element (EGEi). In this regard, numerous objects or structural components of the printing press can be represented by the replacement layout element (EGEi). These include, for example, at least one unit, at least one printing unit, at least a turning module, at least one roll changer, at least one folding apparatus, at least one roll support, at least one module of a roll support, at least one roll-transporting vehicle, at least one support element of a printing press, a rail element for guiding a roll-transporting vehicle, a processing station for rolls of material, a machine for the further processing of printed products, in particular folded printed products, at least one gripper element for picking up printed products or a module of a machine for further processing of printed products.
As another example, a printing unit can be represented by means of the replacement layout element (EGEi) and, within this replacement layout element (EGEi), a printing cylinder or an inking roller can be represented by means of a plurality of replacement layout elements (EGEi).
It is possible to selectively represent the detailed object, or its associated replacement layout element (EGEi).
It is also conceivable to link the information from several replacement layout elements (EGEi).
Although the present invention has been disclosed in terms of a number of preferred embodiments and variations thereon, it will be understood that numerous additional variations and modifications could be made thereto without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the following claims.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 101 57 269.7 | Nov 2001 | DE | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/DE02/04280 | 11/21/2002 | WO |
