The present application relates to a “soft” contact lens with excellent wearing properties.
Conventional contact lenses, e.g. those known from the German utility model publication G 87 10 765 U1, have a radially inner part made of a harder material, and a radially outer part made of a softer material. The inner surface is entirely concave and the outer surface entirely convex, i.e. both surfaces have a positive Gaussian curvature. This known lens is not satisfactory with regard to its wearing comfort.
The invention aims at providing a contact lens having good or even excellent wearing comfort, and a method for its manufacture.
This problem is solved by a contact lens made of silicone, wherein a radial cross section on the inner face has a rim region between a point of inflection and the outer edge in which the cross section contour is convex, in particular with a radius of between 0.1 and 10 mm. Because of this rim contour, the lens particularly readily slips onto the tear liquid film.
According to another aspect, the problem is solved by a process in which a silicone precursor material is brought in between a female and a male mold and is polymerised, and the polymerised contact lens is removed from the mold by means of a liquid swelling the contact lens and completed without edge cutting. Thereby the occurrence of a cutting edge, which might be perceived as irritating, is avoided.
Further features of the invention are available from the subsequent description of embodiments in conjunction with the claims and the drawings. The invention is not limited to the described embodiments, but defined by the scope of the appended claims. In particular, individual features of embodiments of the invention may be realized in a different number or combination than in the examples explained hereunder. In the following explanation of embodiments reference is made to the appended drawings, which show:
The general shape of a contact lens is shown in
The inner face 1 also has an annular region radially contiguous to the central region with the elliptical face, which, however, is less curved, thus more flattish, corresponding to a larger radius of curvature in this region. Herein, the radius of curvature in a sectional plane is meant, which plane contains the optical axis of the lens. The line formed by the inner face and the sectional plane forms a point of inflection 6, i.e. the curvature of the line first becomes zero and then positive. For the Gaussian surface curvature, this means a transition to negative values. To this region, the region is contiguous, where the inner face of the contact lens approaches to the global tangential plane; here, the curvature in the main section perpendicular to the radial sectional plane is zero, so that the Gaussian surface curvature becomes zero and still further outside, in the immediate edge region, again transitions to positive values.
Between these two points (in the sectional plane) or lines (on the surface), respectively, of curvature inflection 6 and 7, there is a region in which the contact lens gradually lifts, when viewed radially from inner to outer region, from the cornea. This region is crucial for the wearing comfort. As recognized by the inventors, in this region there should neither be formed an overly sharp edge, which might interrupt the film of tear liquid present on the cornea or might even cut into the cornea; nor should the rim region have an outwardly pointed, protruding, strongly curved edge (“Skispitzen-Profil”), which might irritate the eyelid slipping onto it from outwards during blinking. Rather, the annular regions according to the invention, smoothly transitioning towards an outer edge free from any sharp edges, (see
In
In
From the proceedings of the process an irregularity of the outer results insofar as it deviates from an exact circle line, other than known e.g. from punched lens contours. Because also the cornea never has exactly regular contours, this deviation from an ideal shape not only is not detrimental, but even has beneficial effects on the wearing comfort. The amount of the irregularity may be quantified by assigning, by calculation, an ideally approximating circle line to the projection of the outer rim, according to the criterion of a minimum sum of the squared deviations. The, the average square deviation is a measure of the irregularity, and is at least 5000 μm2 (converted to magnitudes: about 1% of half the lens diameter), but in embodiments may be more than 1000 μm2 or more than 10000 μm2.
The contact lens formed according to the invention may be used as a cover lens, i.e. with or without refractive power for physically protecting the cornea from irritations. This may be useful as a flanking, itself non-therapeutic measure for a medicinal-therapeutic eye treatment.
In the subsequent claims, “mainly consisting” is understood as a mass proportion of more than 50%, in particular of more than 90% up to entirely. “Curvature” is in each case the inverse radius of curvature, i.e. the radius of the approaching circle, wherein the sign is positive for convex surfaces and is negative for concave surfaces. The Gaussian surface curvature is the product of the two principal curvatures, thus is negative when both the principal curvatures have different signs (saddle surface), and is zero when one or both principal curvatures are zero (e.g. cylinder and conus surface).
The skilled person will realize that deviations from the embodiments described above are possible without leaving the scope of protection of the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
12000660 | Feb 2012 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2013/000326 | 2/1/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/083856 | 6/13/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4042652 | Feneberg | Aug 1977 | A |
4285890 | Mizutani et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4955711 | Wise et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5466147 | Appleton et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
6310116 | Yasuda et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6444145 | Clutterbuck | Sep 2002 | B1 |
7320587 | Goodenough et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
20030008063 | Chabrecek et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040075182 | Gobron | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20060006558 | Yamada | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070035693 | Back | Feb 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
24 14 928 | Jun 1975 | DE |
87 10 765 | Mar 1987 | DE |
0 908 476 | Apr 1999 | EP |
S53134456 | Jan 1978 | JP |
S63040293 | Feb 1988 | JP |
H011187527 | Jul 1989 | JP |
H06510486 | Nov 1994 | JP |
H08505295 | Jun 1996 | JP |
H11172149 | Jun 1999 | JP |
2003508268 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2004001473 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004536633 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2007045157 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2007048703 | Feb 2007 | JP |
9304848 | Mar 1993 | WO |
9411118 | May 1994 | WO |
2001017756 | Mar 2001 | WO |
2011050365 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2011050365 | Apr 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for International Patent Application PCT/EP2013/000326 mailed Apr. 3, 2013. |
First Office Action mailed Jun. 17, 2014 in corresponding Japanese Application No. JP 2014-522122. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140347621 A1 | Nov 2014 | US |