This invention relates to control of medical devices in a subject body, and more particularly to placement of medical devices in a target location of the subject body.
Interventional medicine is the collection of medical procedures in which access to the site of treatment is made through one of the patient's blood vessels, body cavities or lumens. For example, electro-physiology mapping of the heart is most often performed using a catheter which may be inserted into a patient's arterial system through a puncture of the femoral artery in the groin area. Other interventional medical procedures include assessment and treatment of tissues on the inner surfaces of the heart (endocardial surfaces) accessed via peripheral veins or arteries, treatment of vascular defects such as cerebral aneurysms, removal of embolic clots and debris from vessels, treatment of tumors via vascular access, endoscopy of the intestinal tract, etc.
Interventional medicine technologies have been applied to manipulation of instruments which contact tissues during surgical procedures, making these procedures more precise, repeatable and less dependent of the device manipulation skills of the physician. Some presently available interventional medical systems for directing and manipulating the distal tip of a medical device by actuation of the distal portion of the device use computer assisted navigation and an imaging system for providing imaging of the device and blood vessels and tissues. Such systems can control the navigation of a medical device, such as a catheter, to a target destination in an operating region using a computer to orient and guide the distal tip through blood vessels and tissue. In some cases, when the computed direction for reaching the target destination is determined and the medical device is extended, it is desired to establish sufficient contact of the medical device with the intended target location on the three dimensional tissue surface. Adequate contact with the tissue surface within the subject body is important, for instance, in the analysis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. A method is therefore desired for controlling movement of a medical device that will establish adequate contact with the target tissue surface and will allow for treatment of the targeted area.
The method and apparatus of the present invention facilitates the placement of the distal end of a medical device, such as a catheter or microcatheter, against a target location on a three-dimensional curved surface within a subject body. Generally, the present invention comprises a method for establishing contact of a medical device against a three-dimensional surface geometry within a subject body, the method comprising obtaining a three-dimensional tissue surface geometry of a location within the subject body, identifying a desired target location on the surface, computationally determining at least one point spaced from the desired target, stepping a minimum distance from the at least one point to determine whether an image threshold is crossed, and determining a change of at least one control variable for effecting an over-torque of a medical device to enhance contact of the device with the target surface.
In one aspect of the present invention, a three-dimensional surface geometry is suitably rendered in an image model and registered with a known location within the subject body. The model may be used to perform a stepping process to determine if an image surface threshold is crossed, and to determine at least one control variable that may be changed to effect a movement of a virtual or real medical device. The image model of the three-dimensional surface geometry and medical device may be used to predict over-torque of the real or virtual medical device corresponding to the control variable.
In another aspect of the present invention, at least some embodiments of a method provide for determining an over-torque magnetic field to be applied to a medical device to establish adequate contact of the medical device against the target surface of the subject body. In one embodiment, the method allows the user to identify the desired location on an image of the body, which is used to determine an appropriate over-torque rotation corresponding to the local surface geometry at the target location. These and other features and advantages will be in part apparent, and in part pointed out hereinafter.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a method for establishing contact over-torque of the tip of a medical device against a tissue surface within a subject body is provided in accordance with the principles of the present invention. In one embodiment, the method provides for enhancing contact of a medical device with a tissue surface such as the heart, through the suitable application of an over-torque magnetic field. While this embodiment is operable with magnetically navigable medical devices, other embodiments of a method in accordance with the present invention may be used with medical devices that are guided without magnetic navigation but instead use other control methods for remote navigation such as mechanical actuation, electrostrictive actuation, or hydraulic actuation. The method for establishing contact of a medical device against a surface within a subject body comprises obtaining a three-dimensional tissue surface geometry of a region within the subject body, identifying a desired target location on the surface, defining at least one point spaced from the desired target, computationally stepping a minimum distance from the at least one point to determine whether an image threshold is crossed, and determining a change of at least one control variable for effecting an over-torque of a medical device to enhance contact of the device with the target surface.
A medical device such as a catheter may be navigated to the interior of a subject body of a patient by various means, including but not limited to magnetic navigation. Once the medical device has been navigated to a target surface of the body, such as a heart wall, the contact of the medical device against the tissue may be enhanced by suitably over-torquing the medical device against the tissue surface. A virtual representation of the medical device may be suitably rendered in a three-dimensional model of the surface geometry, and the method may then be used to determine a change to a control variable for affecting an over-torque of the medical device against the surface tissue. Such virtual modeling of the medical device may be used to predict the over-torque of the medical device prior to movement of the actual medical device. Where the medical device is a magnetically navigable medical device, the over-torque may be applied through the application of a magnetic field. Where a magnetically navigable medical device is used, for example, this may be accomplished by applying a magnetic moment in a direction that provides the maximum over torque (i.e., leads the orientation of the catheter tip by an angle of approximately 90° as measured about an axis that is normal to the plane defined by the catheter tip orientation and the local surface normal). This over-torque may be used to enhance contact with the tissue to obtain improved electro-physiology electrical readings, or to apply improved ablation treatment. A suitable over-torque of the magnetic field and the medical device depends on the local surface geometry of the target location within the body. In the following we shall describe the particular case when magnetic field actuation is used to remotely navigate the medical device, as a non-limiting example of an actuation method. Other actuation techniques could be employed as would be familiar to persons skilled in the art of remote surgical navigation.
Referring to
Next, a vector {right arrow over (c)} (indicated at 30) that is orthogonal to unit normal vector {right arrow over (n)} is defined as {right arrow over (c)}={right arrow over (n)}×{right arrow over (a)}, such that {right arrow over (a)} and {right arrow over (c)} span the local tangent plane p at point {right arrow over (x)}0. Then, two points indicated at 32 and 34 are defined as:
{right arrow over (x)}1={right arrow over (x)}0−l{right arrow over (c)}, and
{right arrow over (x)}2={right arrow over (x)}0l{right arrow over (c)}, where the distance/is approximately 4 to 7 millimeters.
Next, starting from {right arrow over (x)}1, incremental steps in the −{right arrow over (n)} direction are made (computationally) at an increment of about 1-5 millimeters. The incremental step is made in association with a three-dimensional image model of the surface geometry, which may determine whether the incremental step results in an image threshold crossing. The above distances are suitable for applications of determining the curvature of certain surfaces such as the interior of a heart. It should be noted that the above distances and increments are exemplary in nature, and may be varied for a variety of applications. If an image intensity threshold crossing of the surface occurs during the stepping process (e.g. the intensity value changes from a low value to a high value), the surface is locally positively curved in the device deflection plane. If no intensity threshold crossing of the surface occurs, the surface is locally negatively curved in approximately the device deflection plane. This can be confirmed by incrementally stepping in the −{right arrow over (n)} direction starting from {right arrow over (x)}2, to confirm the absence of any image threshold crossings at {right arrow over (x)}2.
In one preferred embodiment of the present invention, if there is no occurrence of an image intensity threshold crossing, the vector a (defined above) is redefined and set equal to the vector u defining the base of the medical device: {right arrow over (a)}←{right arrow over (u)}. In a second preferred embodiment, the vector c is used to redefine a: a←c. In a third preferred embodiment, the principal directions of curvature of the surface at the target location are determined using the deviation of the shape of a local surface patch away from the local tangent plane as given by standard methods of differential geometry, and the principal direction v corresponding to the minimum signed curvature is used to redefine a: a←v.
As an illustrative non-limiting example of changing a control variable in order to enhance surface contact, we consider the case of magnetic navigation, where an externally applied magnetic field is used to actuate and generally control the configuration of a magnetically endowed medical device. Other actuation technologies could be used for the same purpose and in these other cases the change of control variable would be mapped suitably as could be determined by persons skilled in the art of the appropriate actuation technology with the help of the teachings contained herein.
In the case of magnetic navigation, in general the external magnetic field can be suitably oriented or rotated to optimize surface contact of the medical device with the local tissue surface. In order to determine the rotation of the medical device, the field vector will be rotated about the (rotation axis) vector {right arrow over (a)} (suitably defined in various embodiments as described above) by an angle θ to establish a new field vector defined as:
{right arrow over (B)}=R{right arrow over (a)}(θ){right arrow over (B)}0 (1)
These methods of the various embodiments generally ensure that the tip of the medical device either directly pushes out against the local tissue surface, or in cases where the surface curvature is not suitably optimal, pushes sideways against the surface in a direction of strongly positive curvature. In either case contact with the local surface position is enhanced and stabilized, which feature is helpful for instance when the tissue surface is in motion, as in the case of the endocardial surface.
If vector {right arrow over (a)}=(ax, ay, az), then a 3×3 skew-symmetric matrix can be defined as:
and the rotation matrix for rotating the device about axis a can be written as:
R{right arrow over (a)}(θ)=I3×3+sin θA+(1−cos θ)A2, (3)
where I is the 3×3 identity matrix To determine the angle of rotation θ for the rotation matrix in equation (3), we initially determine the lag angle φ=cos−1({right arrow over (t)}·{right arrow over (B)}0). We can use θ≈(π/2−φ) as a reasonable assumption for a good value of θ. The tip of the medical device 24 may then be rotated according to the rotation matrix in equation (3) above. Alternatively, the angle θ can be defined or set by the user using a slider on a Graphical User Interface. The range of the slider could be limited in some embodiments, so that for example the slider range could correspond to rotation angles θ in the range (−30 degrees, 45 degrees) in one preferred embodiment. In alternate embodiments different slider ranges could be used. In one preferred embodiment the rotation angle is applied incrementally based on any rotation that has already been applied so that the total rotation angle measured from the original field configuration (corresponding to the catheter tip just touching the target location) is θ as determined by the slider setting. An example of the latter embodiment is the case when catheter tip localization (position and orientation) information is available. Given the desired angle of rotation that is thus determined, the magnet system is controlled to apply a magnetic field in a direction that provides the requisite over-torque such that catheter tip contact with the tissue surface is enhanced. Once the tip has established firm contact with the surface 20 and is not able to move further, the tip is not aligned with the field vector {right arrow over (B)}0. Thus, the lag between the field vector {right arrow over (B)}0 and the actual orientation of the tip can provide an indication that the tip of the medical device is in an over-torque contact with the surface 20. Likewise, where an imaging system is used, the prolapse or bend in the distal portion of the medical device 24 that can be seen in the acquired images, or the observation that the device tip has not changed position may also indicate that the tip has established an over-torque contact with the surface 20. The method of determining the rotation of the field vector automatically can also account for the lag angle and other physical properties of the medical device, as given above.
The advantages of the above described embodiment and improvements should be readily apparent to one skilled in the art, as to enabling over-torque of a medical device and thereby enhancing device-tissue contact against a three dimensional surface within a subject body when the device is controlled by a remote navigation system. The actual controls used by the remote navigation system could comprise actuation schemes employing any one or more of magnetic, mechanical, electrostrictive, hydraulic or other actuation means familiar to those skilled in the art. Additional design considerations may be incorporated without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is not intended that the invention be limited by the particular embodiment or form described above, but by the appended claims.
This is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/314,826, filed Dec. 20, 2005, which is now U.S. Pat. No. 7,751,867, which issued Jul. 6, 2010, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/637,504, filed Dec. 20, 2004.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5353807 | DeMarco | Oct 1994 | A |
5654864 | Ritter et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5707335 | Howard et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5779694 | Howard et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5931818 | Werp et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6014580 | Blume et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6015414 | Werp et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6128174 | Ritter et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6148823 | Hastings | Nov 2000 | A |
6152933 | Werp et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157853 | Blume et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6212419 | Blume et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6241671 | Ritter et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6272370 | Gillies et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6292678 | Hall et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296604 | Garibaldi et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6298257 | Hall et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6298259 | Kucharczyk et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304768 | Blume et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311082 | Creighton, IV et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6315709 | Garibaldi et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330467 | Creighton, IV et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6352363 | Munger et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364823 | Garibaldi et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375606 | Garibaldi et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385472 | Hall et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6401723 | Garibaldi et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6428551 | Hall et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6459924 | Creighton, IV et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6475223 | Werp et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6505062 | Ritter et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6507751 | Blume et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6522909 | Garibaldi et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6524303 | Garibaldi | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6527782 | Hogg et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6529761 | Creighton, IV et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6537196 | Creighton, IV et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542766 | Hall et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6562019 | Sell | May 2003 | B1 |
6630879 | Creighton, IV et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6662034 | Segner et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6677752 | Creighton, IV et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6702804 | Ritter et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6733511 | Hall et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6740103 | Werp et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6755816 | Ritter et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6786219 | Garibaldi et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6817364 | Garibaldi et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6834201 | Gillies et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6902528 | Garibaldi et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6911026 | Hall et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6940379 | Creighton | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6968846 | Viswanathan | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6975197 | Creighton, IV | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6980843 | Eng et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7008418 | Hall et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7010338 | Ritter et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7017584 | Garibaldi et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7019610 | Creighton, IV et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7020512 | Ritter et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7066924 | Garibaldi et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7072703 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7137976 | Ritter et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7161453 | Creighton, IV | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7189198 | Harburn et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7190819 | Viswanathan | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7211082 | Hall et al | May 2007 | B2 |
7248914 | Hastings et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7264584 | Ritter et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7276044 | Ferry et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7286034 | Creighton | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7305263 | Creighton, IV | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7313429 | Creighton, IV et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7341063 | Garbibaldi et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7346379 | Eng et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7389778 | Sabo et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7416335 | Munger | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7495537 | Tunay | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7505615 | Viswanathan | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7516416 | Viswanathan et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7537570 | Kastelein | May 2009 | B2 |
7540288 | Viswanathan et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7540866 | Viswanathan et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7543239 | Viswanathan et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7555331 | Viswanathan | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7567233 | Garibaldi et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7603905 | Creighton, IV | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7623736 | Viswanathan | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7625382 | Werp et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7627361 | Viswanathan | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7630752 | Viswanathan | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7635342 | Ferry et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7657075 | Viswanathan | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7662126 | Creighton, IV | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7690619 | Wolfersberger | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7708696 | Ritter et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7742803 | Viswanathan et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7747960 | Garibaldi et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7751867 | Viswanathan | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7756308 | Viswanathan | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7757694 | Ritter et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7761133 | Viswanathan et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7766856 | Ferry et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7769428 | Viswanathan et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7769444 | Pappone | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7771415 | Ritter et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7771437 | Hogg et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7772950 | Tunay | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7774046 | Werp et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7815580 | Viswanathan | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7818076 | Viswanathan | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7961926 | Viswanathan | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8027714 | Shachar | Sep 2011 | B2 |
20010038683 | Ritter et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020019644 | Hastings et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020100486 | Creighton, IV et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020177789 | Ferry et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20040006301 | Sell et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019447 | Shachar | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040030244 | Garibaldi et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040064153 | Creighton, IV et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040068173 | Viswanathan | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040096511 | Harburn et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040133130 | Ferry et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040147829 | Segner et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040157082 | Ritter et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040158972 | Creighton, IV et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040186376 | Hogg et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199074 | Ritter et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040249262 | Werp et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249263 | Creighton, IV | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260172 | Ritter et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267106 | Segner et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004585 | Hall et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050020911 | Viswanathan et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021063 | Hall et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033162 | Garibaldi et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043611 | Sabo et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050065435 | Rauch et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050096589 | Shachar | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113628 | Creighton et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113812 | Viswanathan et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119556 | Gillies et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050119687 | Dacey, Jr. et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050182315 | Ritter et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050256398 | Hastings et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050273130 | Sell | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060009735 | Viswanathan et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060025675 | Viswanathan et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060025679 | Viswanathan et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060025719 | Viswanathan et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036125 | Viswanathan et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036163 | Viswanathan | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036213 | Viswanathan et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041178 | Viswanathan et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041179 | Viswanathan et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041180 | Viswanathan et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041181 | Viswanathan et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041245 | Ferry et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060058646 | Viswanathan | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074297 | Viswanathan | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060079745 | Viswanathan | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060079812 | Viswanathan | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060093193 | Viswanathan | May 2006 | A1 |
20060094956 | Viswanathan | May 2006 | A1 |
20060100505 | Viswanathan | May 2006 | A1 |
20060114088 | Shachar | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060116633 | Shachar | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060144407 | Aliberto et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060144408 | Ferry | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060270948 | Viswanathan et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060278248 | Viswanathan | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070016010 | Creighton, IV et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016131 | Munger et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070021731 | Garibaldi et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070021742 | Viswanathan | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070021744 | Creighton, IV | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070032746 | Sell | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038065 | Creighton, IV et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038074 | Ritter et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070040670 | Viswanathan | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043455 | Viswanathan et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070049909 | Munger | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055124 | Viswanathan et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070060829 | Pappone | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070060916 | Pappone | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070060962 | Pappone | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070060992 | Pappone | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070062546 | Viswanathan et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070062547 | Pappone | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073288 | Hall et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070123964 | Davies et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070146106 | Creighton, IV | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070149946 | Viswanathan et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070161882 | Pappone | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167720 | Viswanathan | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070179492 | Pappone | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070197899 | Ritter et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070197906 | Ritter | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070225589 | Viswanathan | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070250041 | Werp | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070270686 | Ritter et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070287909 | Garibaldi et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080004595 | Viswanathan | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080006280 | Aliberto et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015427 | Kastelein et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080015670 | Pappone | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080016677 | Creighton, IV | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080016678 | Creighton, IV et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080039705 | Viswanathan | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080039830 | Munger et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080043902 | Viswanathan | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058608 | Garibaldi et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080058609 | Garibaldi et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080059598 | Garibaldi et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080064933 | Garibaldi et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065061 | Viswanathan | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077007 | Hastings et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080092993 | Creighton, IV | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097200 | Blume et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080114335 | Flickinger et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080132910 | Pappone | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080200913 | Viswanathan | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208912 | Garibaldi | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080228065 | Viswanathan et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228068 | Viswanathan et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080287909 | Viswanathan et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294232 | Viswanathan | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080312673 | Viswanathan et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319303 | Sabo et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090012821 | Besson et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090062646 | Creighton et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090082722 | Munger et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090105579 | Garibaldi | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105645 | Kidd et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090131798 | Minar et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090131927 | Kastelein et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138009 | Viswanathan et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090177032 | Garibaldi et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090177037 | Viswanathan et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090306643 | Pappone et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100063385 | Garibaldi et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100097315 | Garibaldi et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100163061 | Creighton | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100168549 | Pappone | Jul 2010 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Magnetic Manipulation Instrumentation for Medical Physics Research Authors: G. T. Gillies, r. C. Ritter, W. C. Broaddus, M. S. Grady, M. A. Howard, III, R. G. McNeil 1994 American Institute of Physics Rev. Sci. Instrum. vol. 65, No. 3, Mar. 1994 pp. 533-562. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for corresponding PCT/US/2005/046641 Dated: Sep. 27, 2007 pp. 7. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110022029 A1 | Jan 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60637504 | Dec 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11314826 | Dec 2005 | US |
Child | 12830708 | US |