The present disclosure relates generally to mobile wireless communications, and more particularly to validating communications from unknown contacts, updating trusted contact lists stored on mobile wireless communications devices, related session request messages, and methods therefor.
Internet Protocol Over The Air (IOTA), Wireless Application Protocol (WAP) provisioning, and PUSH specifications are wireless communication protocols that enable network operators to program and push content to cellular telephone handsets over the air using a WAP enabled browser. The IOTA provisioning protocol has been implemented by Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) wireless network operators, and the WAP provisioning protocol has been implemented by Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) communication network operators.
To initiate a WAP provisioning session, a Push Proxy Gateway (PPG) sends an Internet Protocol (IP) message, known as a Session Initiation Request (SIR) or a Hello Request, to the mobile station. An IOTA provisioning session is initiated similarly by sending a session request in the form of a modified Short Message Service (SMS) message, known as a bootstrap request, from an SMS Center (SMSC) to the mobile station.
In IOTA provisioning sessions, the SMS or bootstrap request contains information enabling the phone browser to fetch Mobile Management Command (MMC) documents from a specified address. MMC documents manage specific parameters in the mobile handset, for example, by instructing the handset to read and write phone parameters, to initiate A-key exchange, and to update a preferred roaming list (PRL), etc.
Bootstrap request messages are relatively easy to generate and/or modify. If a phone number and its ESN are known, an unauthorized bootstrap message may be generated and sent to the phone with deceitful instructions to fetch a counterfeit MMC document, which may be used to manipulate the phone, for example by instructing it to perform some action that would provide unauthorized service to a hacker.
It has been proposed to protect against spoofing and other unauthorized communications by comparing source addresses from which session initiation requests originate with a list of known valid or trusted contacts stored on the wireless handset. Under the proposal, however, the list of trusted contacts stored in the wireless handset is static and does not provide for ready address changes and/or the removal and addition of new trusted contacts.
The various aspects, features and advantages of the present disclosure will become more fully apparent to those having ordinary skill in the art upon careful consideration of the following Detailed Description thereof with the accompanying drawings described below.
The wireless communication device may be a mobile wireless handset 120, for example, a CDMA or GSM/GPRS or some other mobile communications device.
In
A wireless communications device session request is initiated generally from a server, although the origination point for the session request may be from some other source communicating with the server. Particularly, in the process-flow diagram 300 of
In
In the exemplary application, the session request is a wireless communication device provisioning session request, for example, a bootstrap request or a Session Initiation Request (SIR) or some other provisioning session request. In other applications, more generally, the session request may be a request for a session other than a wireless device provisioning session.
In
In
The list of trusted sources may be obtained by the mobile station from the network and updated periodically. The list of trusted sources is stored in memory on the mobile station, for example, in a SIM, USIM, R-UIM, NVM, etc.
In other applications, validation of the session request may be performed at the network rather than at the mobile handset. For example, the mobile handset may transmit the session request message or relevant portion thereof, for example, the IP address, to the network for validation. The mobile handset and network are generally capable of conducting secured communications, discussed further below, which would ensure the integrity of validation transactions performed at or by the network.
In
In
The signature is generally authenticating information received by the server from the network for presentation to the wireless device for the purpose of authenticating the trustworthiness of the server as a source of information for at least the transaction or session with which the signature is associated. In one embodiment, the signature is valid for only the session with which is it associated. More generally the signature may be valid for a certain specified time period. For example, it may have an expiration period or time stamp associated therewith.
In
The signature is generally combined with the session request message, for example, in a header thereof, by the server and thus transmitted with the session request. In
In the exemplary embodiment of
In
In one embodiment, the network initiates a Shared Secret Data (SSD) update procedure followed by a Unique Challenge Response (UCR) procedure. As a result of these known communication procedures, both the network and the phone are capable of independently generating identical data, values, signature, or keys, etc. The network may also generate an SSD through any of the known Hash algorithms or techniques. In alternative embodiments, other procedures may be used for communicating secured information between the network and mobile station.
In
The signature communicated to the mobile station is effective at least for validating the session request from the server. More generally, however, the signature may be effective for a more extended time period, for example, by associating therewith a time stamp upon the expiration of which a new or updated signature must be acquired. The mobile station may thus store the signature from the network for later use.
In
In
In
In
In other embodiments, the contacts or entries of the trusted contacts list have an expiration period associated therewith. Upon expiration of the time period, the trustworthiness of the contact may be re-established by submission or re-submission of an authorizing signature to the mobile station from the network. In these cases, the contact list clock is reset for a particular contact on the list upon receipt of the authorizing signature, without the need for adding a new contact to the list. In other embodiments, contacts may be removed from the list or otherwise unauthorized.
Upon updating the contact list stored at either the mobile station or the network or both, it is unnecessary for the server or sender of the session request to subsequently obtain a signature from the network or authorizing source. Dynamically updating a trusted contact list stored on the mobile device also enables the device to roam freely without being dependent on a single source for trusted contact list updates.
While the present inventions and what are considered presently to be the best modes thereof have been described in a manner that establishes possession thereof by the inventors and enabling of those having ordinary skill in the art to make and use the same, it will be understood and appreciated that there are many equivalents to the exemplary embodiments disclosed herein and that myriad modifications and variations may be made thereto without departing from the scope and spirit of the inventions, which are to be limited not by the exemplary embodiments but by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5872849 | Sudia | Feb 1999 | A |
5943423 | Muftic | Aug 1999 | A |
5943425 | Mizikovsky | Aug 1999 | A |
5943615 | Rose et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6047070 | Raaf | Apr 2000 | A |
6141544 | Corriveau et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6192131 | Geer et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6415144 | Findikli et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6754829 | Butt et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6772331 | Hind et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
20020067832 | Jablon | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077993 | Immonen et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020102964 | Park | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020142763 | Kolsky | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030014629 | Zuccherato | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030037237 | Abgrall et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030056114 | Goland | Mar 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2000036809 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2001215873 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2002189976 | Jul 2002 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040203598 A1 | Oct 2004 | US |