1. Field of the Invention
The present invention is directed to magnetic position sensors, such as linear position sensors, and more particularly to such sensors having a plurality of magnets configured to generate a signal that varies with a position of the magnets.
2. Description of Related Art
Contactless position sensors are widely known in the art. One kind of contactless sensor uses a magnet attached to a component whose position is to be measured, with a magnetic field sensor at a fixed location, or vice versa, to detect the magnetic field produced by the attached magnet. The sensor measures the magnetic field strength at the location of the sensor, and the detected field strength is used to calculate the location of the magnet. However, the location is not a linear function of the measured field strength, so that the calculation is complicated.
To overcome that difficulty, some position sensors use more than two magnets, a complex shape, or one or two larger magnets, as large as half the range of the distance to be measured, in order to modify the magnetic flux lines to obtain a linear response with the distance. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,088,095 uses one or two magnets of complex shapes, and a Hall sensor measures the orthogonal component of the field. The magnets' dimension is as large as the distance range to be measured.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,268,536 uses two magnets arranged such to produce uniform field in the detection region, and a magnetoelectric transducer provides the position measurement. The dimension of the two magnets is as large as half the distance range to be measured. Other prior art devices require flux directors to modify the magnetic field or flux lines from the magnets to obtain as close to a linear output as possible.
What is needed, therefore, is an instrument, system, and method for measuring the distance an object traverses that addresses the deficiencies in the prior art magnetic devices, one that is relatively compact, easy to manufacture, and outputs a substantially linear signal, and does not require flux directors, and also can operate in various high temperature, high humidity, and high vibration environments.
It is a principal object of the present invention to provide a linear position sensor having magnets, magnetic field sensors, and logic circuits whereby the shape and/or arrangement of two or more magnets produces a magnetic flux density and magnetic field in the regions of the magnetic field sensors that is substantially uniform, thereby producing a linear or approximately linear response from the magnetic field sensors as the two or more magnets move relative to the magnetic field sensors.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a system and method for detecting the linear relative movement of an object using magnets and magnetic field sensors that do not contact one another. Thus, in one example of the invention, two magnets are arranged in such a way to modify the magnetic field or flux density in the detection region such that the difference in the magnetic fields measured at the start- and end-points of the travel path of the magnets is linear with the distance of travel. The magnets are attached to the part of which we seek to locate the position, and the magnetic field sensors are fixed, or vice versa. As the magnets and field sensors are not attached to each other, the instrument is a contactless magnetic linear position sensor.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide a system and method for detecting the relative position of an object in space. In the present invention, the magnetic field sensor output is the difference between the magnetic fields measured at the start- and end-points of the travel path of the object, and it has a linear dependency on the distance or movement of the magnets from the start-point. By measuring the sensor output, the distance or the location of the magnets can be obtained relative to another location, and hence the instrument works as a linear position sensor.
The two magnets are arranged or directed in a way to produce field or flux lines in the region of the magnetic field sensors such that when the magnets are moved linearly the difference in the fields measured at the field sensor positions has a linear relationship with the distance or the movement of the magnets.
It is another object of the present invention to use magnets oriented in a pre-determined angle relative to each other. The angle between the magnetic directions of the two magnets is preferably 90 degrees, but it can be adjusted depending on (i) the surrounding materials, (ii) the distance between the magnetic field sensors, and (iii) the distance between the magnetic field sensors' axis and the travel path of the magnetic field sensors or the magnets. The strength of the magnets can be changed depending on the requirement of resolution on the distance measurement or on the requirement of overall linear position sensor resolution.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide a system and method in which the magnets are fixed in space and the magnetic field sensors move relative to the magnets. Thus, instead of attaching the magnets in the moving object, the magnets could be at fixed locations, and multiple sets of two field sensors could be attached to the moving object or objects. The use of two or more fixed magnets and multiple magnetic field sensors attached to moving parts provides the locations of multiple parts, depending on the specific use of the instrument.
It is another object of the present invention to provide small components for ease of use in tight locations and to reduce costs. In the case of the present invention, the magnets are typically small (e.g., 3 mm long and 2 mm diameter) compared to the range of distance (e.g., 20 mm) to be measured. The shape of the magnets is preferably cylindrical or rod-shaped, which is easy to manufacture. Alternatively, more complex geometrical magnets could be used to further linearize the sensor output. The cross section can be, e.g., square, rectangular, circular, elliptical, or triangular.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a linear position sensor having two field sensors placed at the end points of the travel path of an object. This is fundamentally different from any prior art in that the difference in the magnetic field or flux lines detected at the start- and end-points is linear with the distance traveled by the object. The final output is obtained from the difference in field detected by two sensors. As a result, any contribution to measurement due to an ambient field is automatically canceled out.
The present invention can be applied to any device moving linearly, such as a transmission clutch, in which a precise measurement of position is needed. It can be used in braking to determine the amount of force applied. It can be used in an angular sensor in which the angular movement is small compared to the radius of curvature, since in that case the angular movement at the outer periphery of the rotating object can be approximated as a linear movement. The sensor can also be used in a piston of an engine.
Some exemplary embodiments of the present invention may be used to detect a linear displacement of an object up to about 20 mm. The present invention may be scalable to measure linear displacements of an object to multiples of 20 mm by combining the use of multiple linear position such sensors placed in series.
The magnets can be attached in place using an adhesive such as glue. Welding is not preferred but may also be used.
For improved measurement sensitivity and accuracy, the relative positions of each of the magnets in a pair of magnets (i.e., the angle between them) can be changed as the moving object moves along a trajectory. That is, the angle between the magnets may range from less than 90-degrees to greater than 90-degrees as the object passes from one end-point to another end-point along a known path.
The magnetic field sensors according to the present invention may be flux-gate, Hall, or any other suitable magnetic field sensors.
The angle between the magnets is preferably 90 degrees, although that can be adjusted based on the application in which the instrument is to be used. In applications in which a nearby material may distort the magnetic field, either the angle can be adjusted, or an adjustment can be applied to the output of the magnetic field sensors.
The processing of the output signal by the logic circuits may involve compensating for temperature, other environmental, or device-specific factors.
In the preferred embodiment, the magnets are preferably two rods or cylinders. Alternatively, a dumbbell shape magnet can be used, and the magnets may be encased in plastic to protect them from the environment in which the instrument will operate.
A preferred embodiment of the invention will be set forth in detail with reference to the drawings, in which:
Several preferred embodiments of the invention are described for illustrative purposes, it being understood that the invention may be embodied in other forms not specifically shown in the drawings. The figures will be described with respect to the system structure and methods for using the system to achieve one or more of the objects of the invention. In the drawings, like reference numerals refer to like elements throughout.
Turning first to
Preferably, the magnet 100 is made of a homogeneous material, either crystalline or amorphous, or a combination of crystalline and amorphous materials, that is capable of being permanently magnetized and thus the magnet 100 should possess a remanent magnetization. The strength of the magnetic field produced by the magnet 100 in a quiescent state will become readily apparent from the following disclosure. The minimum magnetic field that is potentially detectable depends on the type and resolution of magnetic field sensors 204, 206, and the strength of the magnetic flux/field.
Turning now to
The individual magnets 100 are positioned proximate to each other. Preferably, the individual magnets 100 are attached to each other at their faces 102 such that their respective longitudinal axes form an angle of about 90 degrees relative to each other. It is also possible that a single L-shaped magnet could be used as long as it is magnetized in a manner such that it has the same magnetic flux-generating properties as the magnet pair 212. The magnet pair 212 is mounted on the optional movable body 202. The movable body 202 may be attached to a moveable component of another system. Alternatively, the movable component of the system in which the linear position sensor system 200 is used may be modified such that the magnet pair 212 is attached directly to the movable component. The movable body 202 and/or the component of the system to which the magnet pair 212 is attached, may follow a substantially linear travel path having a travel distance, D, of about 20 millimeters, as shown in
The two magnetic field sensors 204, 206 are preferably positioned about 24 mm apart and attached to a substrate 208, such as a steel block or on a PCB. The two magnetic field sensors 204, 206 are positions on a line substantially parallel to the direction of movement of the magnet pair 212. The substrate/steel block 208, and hence the magnetic field sensors 204,206, are approximately 11 millimeters from the movable body 202 and/or the magnet pair 212. Thus, there is no physical contact between the field generating and the field sensing portions of the linear position sensor system 200 as they move substantially parallel to each other.
To measure movements greater than about 20 millimeters, additional magnet pairs and magnetic field sensors can be added to the instrument. For example, two magnet pairs 212 could be spaced apart and mounted on a movable body 202 in a line parallel to the intended direction the movable body 202 will traverses. Additional magnetic field sensors could be added to the substrate 208 in a line that is parallel to the line of magnet pairs.
The processor 210, which is connected to and receives the electrical signals outputted by the magnetic field sensors 204, 206, calculates the displacement of the magnet pair 212 and/or the movable body 202 using logic circuits well know to those of ordinary skill in the art. For example, generally one could use a circuit in which the two independent magnetic field sensors 204, 206 each output a signal and the circuit obtains a difference between the outputted signals. The logic circuits could be part of a printed circuit board suitable for placement where needed by a specific application of the device.
Turning now to
Turning now to
In practice, each of the magnetic field sensors 204, 206 outputs a voltage according to the magnetic field it detects. The distance the magnet pair 212 or the movable object 202 to which the magnet pair 212 is attached can be estimated by entering the difference in the voltage outputted by the magnetic field sensor 204 and the magnetic field sensor 206 into the straight-line calibration equation (using, for example, a logic circuit), which then outputs a value representing the distance the magnet pair 212 or the movable object 202 moved, within an error of, in the example above, about 1 percent.
Turning now to
An N-points calibration can also be performed to obtain a straight line calibration line. A correction equal to the residue value can be applied to the distance calculated based on the straight-line fit equation. This procedure can also reduce the error to a negligible value.
The linear position sensor system 200 as a whole may operate with or without flux directors at or near the magnetic field sensors 204, 206. Flux directors (not shown) can be used to channel flux toward magnetic field sensors 204, 206 to enhance the signal. The linear position sensor system 200 may also employ a shield or other technique known in the art to compensate for ambient magnetic fields from near or far sources as necessary.
The present invention has many uses, including those described previously. In one example of the invention, the magnet pair 212 may be attached to (or embedded in) a piston of a motor, rod, or other movable member of an automotive passenger vehicle or off-road utility vehicle.
Although certain presently preferred embodiments of the disclosed invention have been specifically described herein, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains that variations and modifications of the various embodiments shown and described herein may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, the magnet pair 212 may be stationary, while the magnetic field sensors are mounted on or within a moving object. Also, if a single magnet is used, the linearity may not be present, but the cancellation of ambient magnetic flux will still be accomplished. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention be limited only to the extent required by the appended claims and the applicable rules of law. The present invention should be construed as limited only by the claims appended to any patent application claiming the benefit of the present application or to any patent issuing therefrom.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4555120 | Frait et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
5351555 | Garshelis | Oct 1994 | A |
5465627 | Garshelis | Nov 1995 | A |
5520059 | Garshelis | May 1996 | A |
5591925 | Garshelis | Jan 1997 | A |
5706572 | Garshelis | Jan 1998 | A |
5708216 | Garshelis | Jan 1998 | A |
5763793 | Ng et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5802479 | Kithil et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5817952 | Swisher et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5837908 | Ng et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5887335 | Garshelis | Mar 1999 | A |
D409935 | Speckhart | May 1999 | S |
5975568 | Speckhart et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6014025 | Cripe | Jan 2000 | A |
6014602 | Kilthil et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6047605 | Garshelis | Apr 2000 | A |
6145387 | Garshelis | Nov 2000 | A |
6220105 | Cripe | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222363 | Cripe | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6260423 | Garshelis | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275146 | Kilthil et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6346812 | May et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6360841 | Blandino et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6411081 | Spellman | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6490934 | Garshelis | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6513395 | Jones | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6553847 | Garshelis | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6581480 | May et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6655471 | Cripe et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6698299 | Cripe | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6761229 | Cripe et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6765357 | Cripe et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6776057 | May | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6810754 | May | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6826969 | May | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6844541 | Alsobrooks et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6871555 | May | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6904814 | May | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6910391 | May | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6956198 | Alsobrooks et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6959612 | May | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6997065 | May | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7088095 | Busch | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7117752 | May | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7124649 | May | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7140258 | May | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7219564 | May | May 2007 | B1 |
7237443 | Speckhart et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7268536 | Hagino et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7283826 | Dufour et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7302867 | May | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7305882 | May | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7317392 | DuRocher | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7521923 | May et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7699118 | Setter et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7843190 | Nishida et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8087304 | Lee | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8125218 | Lackey | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8151654 | Speckhart et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8424393 | Lee | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8578794 | Lee | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8635917 | Lee | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8779306 | Gauthier et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8836458 | Lee | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8893562 | Barraco et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9046430 | Moran et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9086460 | Rice et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
20020027348 | Speckhart et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20040069071 | Speckhart et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050184496 | Speckhart et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060164074 | Andrieu et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060250029 | Kelly et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070103104 | May | May 2007 | A1 |
20070114990 | Godkin | May 2007 | A1 |
20090107257 | May | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090121708 | Lackey | May 2009 | A1 |
20090256553 | Dmytriw et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100018328 | May | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100085041 | Pozidis et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100301846 | Lee | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100308805 | Stuve | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20120166046 | Speckhart et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120194198 | Moran | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120316814 | Rahaman et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130088218 | Rahaman et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20150204737 | Moran et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150276520 | Ursetta et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0058704 | Oct 2000 | WO |
03014757 | Feb 2003 | WO |
2004029569 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2004074787 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2004113844 | Dec 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130088218 A1 | Apr 2013 | US |