This invention relates generally to containers for products susceptible to degradation from moisture. More particularly, this invention relates to flip-top moisture tight containers which are simple to open and close repeatedly and which include two or more seals in series between the lid and the body which reliably provide moisture tightness after several cycles of opening and closing. Containers according to the present invention may be utilized for, e.g., pharmaceuticals, probiotics, nutraceuticals, diagnostic test strips and other moisture sensitive items.
The efficacy of medication may be compromised by moisture. As the medication absorbs moisture, the medication may become less effective for its intended purpose. Diagnostic test strips, such as blood glucose test strips that are used in diabetic care, can also be adversely affected by exposure to moisture.
Medication and/or test strips are typically stored in a container. Such a container may include a body that defines an interior for housing a product, and an opening leading to the interior. A cap or lid may also be included, optionally connected to the body by a hinge. By closing the lid on the body to cover and seal the opening, the container is closed and contents may be safely stored therein.
Products such as diagnostic test strips rely on certain environmental conditions to provide an accurate reading when used. If subjected to a certain moisture or relative humidity, these products can provide false readings with hi or low bias. Thus, moisture can significantly reduce the shelf life of these products. Consumers that require diagnostic test strip testing, such as the diabetic market, often test multiple times within a 24 hour period and depend on the accuracy of the readings they get.
Medication and diagnostic test strips can encounter moisture at multiple times in their life cycles. Such an encounter may occur during the manufacturing stage, during shipping, while the product is in storage prior to being sold, while the product is in storage after being sold, and each and every time a container containing the product is opened so that the product can be used. Even after products are stored in moisture tight containers, there still exists a small amount of moisture ingress through the seal, which over time can be deleterious to moisture sensitive contents inside. For this reason, a desiccant material (e.g., in the form of a desiccant entrained polymer) is typically provided in the container to absorb moisture. However, the desiccant material adds to the cost of manufacturing. An improved seal would translate to a reduced volume of desiccant to achieve the calculated moisture budget and thus a less expensive-to-manufacture container.
On the other hand, the seal itself should not significantly add to the cost of making the container or else the cost savings through reduced use of desiccant can be cancelled out. In addition, the seal itself must be carefully designed so that it does not require significant force to open while at the same time not being too easy to open such that the container could inadvertently pop open, e.g., due to pressure changes that may occur during transport. In the pharmaceutical and diagnostics packaging business, it is important to balance product improvements with manufacturing efficiencies and cost realities.
There is thus a need for an improved flip-top container for pharmaceutical or diagnostic test strip use, which is inexpensive to make and provides a reliably moisture-tight sealing effect after several cycles of opening and closing, without requiring high opening force to open.
Accordingly, a moisture tight container in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention is provided. The container has a container body having a base and a sidewall extending from the base. The body defines an interior configured for housing product, such as diagnostic test strips, for example. The body further has an opening leading to the interior. A lid is connected to the body by a hinge and is pivotable about the hinge with respect to the container body to move the container between a closed position in which the lid covers the opening so as to create a moisture tight seal with the body and an open position in which the opening is exposed. The moisture tight seal is provided by a plurality of engaged mating seals in series between the body and the lid when the lid is in the closed position. The plurality of engaged mating seals includes at least a first seal and a second seal. The first seal is formed by mating a thermoplastic sealing surface of the body to a thermoplastic sealing surface of the lid. The second seal is formed by mating a thermoplastic sealing surface of the body with an elastomeric sealing surface of the lid. The elastomeric sealing surface includes an elastomeric ring that is configured to be compressed by an upper surface of a rim surrounding the opening when the lid is in the closed position. Vertical compression of the elastomeric ring causes a portion of the ring to elastically expand radially into a void provided between the body and the lid.
A moisture tight container in accordance with another exemplary embodiment of the present invention thus includes a body and a lid. The body defines an interior for housing a product, and an opening leading to the interior. The lid is connected to the body with a hinge. The lid is movable with respect to the body between a closed position in which the lid covers the opening and is mated to the body, and an opened position in which the opening is exposed. A plurality of seals are located between the body and the lid. The seals are in series when the lid is in the closed position. The plurality of seals includes a first seal that requires an opening force to transition from the closed position to the opened position, and a second seal in combination with the first seal not requiring more than the opening force to transition from the closed position to the opened position. The first seal is formed by mating thermoplastic-to-thermoplastic sealing surfaces, and the first seal includes an undercut of the body relative to a central axis of the body. The second seal is formed by mating elastomer-to-thermoplastic sealing surfaces, and the elastomer-to-thermoplastic sealing surfaces includes an elastomer formed in the lid or on the body, optionally with multi-shot injection molding. The thermoplastic is incompressible and the elastomer is compressible and preferably resilient.
The invention will be described in conjunction with the following drawings in which like reference numerals designate like elements and wherein:
Generally, the invention is directed to containers and methods for making the same for reducing the amount of moisture that enters a container between the container body and the lid that seals the body. In one aspect, the disclosed embodiments are configured to reduce the amount of moisture that can flow between the body and the lid by providing at least two seals in series, wherein one such seal is formed by an elastomer-to-thermoplastic interface, which uniquely does not increase force needed to open the container. As used herein, the term “elastomer” is to be understood in its broad sense. A particularly preferred elastomer is a thermoplastic elastomer (TPE), optionally one having a Shore A hardness of from 20 to 50, preferably from 20 to 40, more preferably from 20 to 35. Alternatively, the term “elastomer” may include silicone rubbers or other preferably injection moldable soft and resilient materials appropriate for creating a compression seal against a harder (e.g., thermoplastic) surface. In any embodiment, the elastomer should be configured for repeated use, i.e., should not degrade over several cycles (e.g., at least 10, preferably at least 25, more preferably at least 50 cycles) of opening and closing.
Optionally, the invention relates to a container produced in a multi-shot injection molding process wherein the elastomeric seal is produced in one shot and the thermoplastic container is produced in another shot. Container embodiments as disclosed herein preferably incorporate a hinged flip-top lid, wherein the body and lid include therebetween a low mass elastomer-to thermoplastic seal working in series with a thermoplastic-to-thermoplastic seal between the body and lid. The combined seals further reduce moisture vapor transmission into the container when closed than either seal alone, allowing for longer shelf life protection while still enabling the container to have a low opening force to benefit consumer use.
The external container is constructed of two materials, namely (primarily) a base thermoplastic (e.g., polypropylene) and an elastomer, preferably a thermoplastic elastomer (TPE) as one sealing surface of the invention. The container has an integrated lid connected to the body by a hinge, optionally a living hinge, which is designed to be easily opened and closed by the consumer. By nature of the material selection and thermoplastic-to-thermoplastic seal design, the container has a low moisture vapor transmission rate (MVTR). This container also incorporates an elastomer material to create an additional elastomer-to-thermoplastic seal to further reduce the MVTR. By further reducing the MVTR, the container requires less moisture protection via any method of desiccation to achieve a targeted shelf life. The combination of seals allows the container to provide a lower MVTR than an otherwise comparable reference container having only thermoplastic-to-thermoplastic sealing, and at the same time allows for a lower opening and closing force than would be expected when using a thermoplastic-to-elastomer seal alone. In addition, the low mass of elastomer material will still allow the recycle/re-use of the external container material in a container production process.
A thermoplastic hinge flip-top container in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention is constructed of materials with a low vapor transmission rate, e.g., polypropylene. In addition, the container lid is designed with a sealing mechanism that incorporates both a thermoplastic-to-thermoplastic seal in combination with a thermoplastic-to-elastomer seal that is permanently produced optionally inside the lid seal area, optionally via multi shot injection molding. The thermoplastic-to-thermoplastic seal area may be designed with an undercut at an angle (or rounding or slope) to the center axis of the vial that is not only part of the thermoplastic-to-thermoplastic seal, but due to the geometry, also controls the opening and closing force of the vial. By having the thermoplastic-to-thermoplastic seal work in series with the thermoplastic-to-elastomer seal, the compression force necessary to be applied to the thermoplastic seal to achieve the same level of moisture ingress may, in an optional aspect of the invention, be reduced. This may facilitate reduction of opening and closing force, thus making the container easier to use for the consumer. This is particularly useful for consumer populations that may have difficulty in opening and closing containers such as patients with diabetic neuropathy, or senior citizens.
A thermoplastic-to-thermoplastic seal relies on the mating of two incompressible surfaces that must match geometrically very closely in order to provide a closing relationship (e.g., snap-fit) and to act as an effective moisture barrier. This requires sufficient compression force to mate the opposing incompressible surfaces, thus forming the seal. The effectiveness of the seal is dependent on the area of contact and the amount of air space (e.g., through microgaps or due to imperfections or wear and tear of the thermoplastic material) between the surfaces that allow moisture to pass through.
A thermoplastic-to-elastomer seal relies on one incompressible surface (the thermoplastic surface) mating with a compressible and preferably resilient surface (the elastomeric surface). This type of seal relies on generating sufficient force between the surfaces to compress the elastomer such that it “fills” any possible gaps or imperfections in the opposing incompressible surface. This pressure must be maintained at all times when the container is closed to provide moisture tightness and then overcome in order to open the container.
By combining a thermoplastic-to-thermoplastic seal in series with a thermoplastic-to-elastomer seal, the moisture vapor ingress can be reduced while still maintaining the container opening force in a range that is ergonomically advantageous to the consumer population.
In one optimal aspect of the embodiments disclosed herein, the elastomer-to-thermoplastic seal is configured and oriented such that the direction of compression of the seal is parallel with the main axis of the vial and vertical to the seal surface. This is the case whether the elastomer is on an inner portion of the vial lid, on an outer rim projecting radially from the vial body or on a top edge of the vial body disposed around the opening (or optionally two or all three of the foregoing). This way when the vial is opened and closed, the elastomer-to-thermoplastic seal is not subject to radial forces that can rub the elastomer and scarf or damage the seal (which may occur if such seal was on the side of the vial rim or on the inner skirt of the vial lid). This enables repeated openings without deteriorating performance of the elastomer-to-thermoplastic seal. This configuration enables the use of a lower durometer seal material which requires less compression force and again provides lower opening force with lower ingress rates than a reference vial that is otherwise identical but for the elastomer-to-thermoplastic seal. In addition, this configuration does not increase the opening force of the seal, unlike a stopper-type seal with a radially compressed elastomeric element.
Referring now in detail to the various figures of the drawings wherein like reference numerals refer to like parts, there is shown in
Container 100 includes a container body 101 having a base 155 and an optionally tubular sidewall 105 extending therefrom, the body 101 defining an interior 115 configured for housing product, e.g., diagnostic test strips. The sidewall 105 optionally terminates at a lip 110 having a top edge, the lip 110 surrounding an opening 107 of the body 101, leading to the interior 115.
A lid 120 is preferably connected to the body 101 by a hinge 140, optionally a living hinge, creating a flip-top container 100 or vial. The lid 120 is pivotable about the hinge 140 with respect to the container body 101 to move the container between a closed position (see, e.g.,
Container body 101 may optionally include outer rim 145 that projects radially outward from the sidewall 105 and completely encircles container body 101 near a top thereof. Optionally, the lip 110 projects vertically from the rim 145. Optionally, in any embodiment, the lip 110 has a thickness approximately equal to the remainder of the sidewall 105. Optionally, in any embodiment, the lip 110 has a thickness slightly less than that of the remainder of the sidewall 105.
Lid 101 includes a lid base 119 and preferably a depending skirt 125. Lid 101 further includes a lid outer rim 131 and optionally a thumb tab 121 extending radially from the lid 120. In order to close container 100, the lid 120 is pivoted about the hinge 140 so that the lid 120 covers the opening 107 and engages respective mating sealing surfaces of the lid 120 and body 101, to place lid 120 in closed position.
When the lid 120 is in the closed position, lid rim surface 208 faces body rim surface 206. Thus, when lid 120 is in the closed position, body rim surface 206 and at least portions of lid rim surface 208 engage each other. Affixed to body rim surface 206 is elastomer seal 210a. The seal 210a is preferably an annular ring disposed around the circumference of body rim surface 206. In the illustrated exemplary embodiment, an elastomer-to-thermoplastic seal is created by elastomer seal 210a engaging and being compressed by lid rim surface 208.
Lid 120 includes lid interior 109, defined by lid base 119 and skirt 125. The lip 110 of body 101 extends into lid interior 109 when the lid 120 is in the closed position. In that position, body undercut surface 204 of body 101 mates with lid undercut surface 202. Accordingly, a thermoplastic-to-thermoplastic sealing surface is formed. In addition, this configuration provides a closing position, e.g., via a snap-fit mating configuration, to retain the lid 120 in the closed position and prevent it from inadvertently opening. As shown in
In the exemplary embodiment shown in
It is contemplated that embodiments according to aspects of the invention may include multiple and different seals in series between lid 120 and body 101. For example, the seals may comprise the seal between lid undercut surface 202 and body undercut surface 204 and the seal between elastomer seal 210a and lid rim surface 208. Alternatively, the two seals may comprise the seal between lid undercut surface 202 and body undercut surface 204 and the seal between lid elastomer seal 212 and top edge 110. While three seals (labeled as Seal A-C) are shown in
It should further be noted that the thermoplastic-to-thermoplastic seal provides the compression force needed to maintain the elastomer-to-thermoplastic seal. This configuration does not require that the elastomer-to-thermoplastic seal be a source of radial compressive force (e.g., as is the case with an elastomeric stopper plugged into a tube). As such, the elastomer-to-thermoplastic seal does not add to the opening force necessary to overcome the thermoplastic-to-thermoplastic seal to transition the lid 120 from the closed position to the opened position. In fact, resilience of the compressed elastomer when the lid 120 is in the closed position may result in a slight vertical spring force biasing the respective undercut surfaces 202,204 vertically against each other, thus reinforcing or strengthening the thermoplastic-to-thermoplastic seal. Thus, if anything, such slight vertical spring force created by the elastomer-to-thermoplastic seal may tend to actually reduce the opening force compared to an otherwise identical container without an elastomeric sealing surface.
As discussed above with respect to the exemplary embodiment shown in
The combination of a thermoplastic-to-thermoplastic seal in series with an elastomer-to-thermoplastic seal according to an optional aspect of the invention provides an MVTR through the sealing system of a maximum of optionally 42 μg/day-cm of seal circumference/day when the ambient conditions are a minimum of 30° C./80% relative humidity (RH) externally and a maximum of 30° C./1% RH internally, while allowing for an opening force of optionally no greater than 3 N/cm of seal circumference.
Referring now to
Container 300 includes a body 301 having a base 355 and optionally a sidewall 305 extending from the base. The body 301 defines an interior 315. The sidewall 305 optionally terminates at a lip 310 having a top edge 311. The lip 310 surrounds an opening 307 of the body 301, leading to the interior 315. In the embodiment shown, container body 301 includes outer rim 345. The lip 310 optionally projects vertically from the rim 345.
A lid 320 is preferably connected to the body 301 by a hinge 340, optionally a living hinge, creating a flip-top container 300 or vial. The lid 320 is pivotable about the hinge 340 with respect to the container body 301 to move the container 300 between a closed position and an open position. In the embodiment shown, lid 301 includes lid base 319 and preferably a depending skirt 325 and thumb tab 321.
When the lid 320 is in the closed position, a moisture tight seal 460 is formed by a plurality of engaged mating seals in series, including at least a first seal 462 and a second seal 464. The first seal 462 is formed by mating a thermoplastic sealing surface of the body 301 with a thermoplastic sealing surface of the lid 320. The first seal 462 is configured to require an opening force to disengage. In the optional embodiment shown, the first seal 462 comprises the engagement of undercut surface 404 of body 301 with undercut surface 402 of lid 320. This seal is identical to the undercut-to-undercut seal disclosed above with respect to the container 100 of
The second seal 464 is formed by mating a thermoplastic sealing surface of the body 301 or lid 320 with an elastomeric sealing surface of the body 301 or lid 320. In the optional embodiment shown, the second seal 464 is formed by mating a thermoplastic sealing surface of the body 301 with an elastomeric sealing surface of the lid 320. The elastomeric sealing surface 430 comprises an elastomeric ring 432 configured to be compressed by a thermoplastic upper surface 311 of a lip 310 surrounding the opening 307 when the lid 320 is in the closed position. As best shown in
The term “ring” as used herein can refer to an annular round element with a central opening. However, a “ring” is not necessarily limited to such configuration and could include non-round configurations as well as elastomeric elements that are filled in, at least in part, in the center (i.e., where an opening of a ring may otherwise be). As such, a “ring” could include a disc-shaped elastomeric member, for example.
Notably, the elastomeric ring 432 is not bounded or blocked on either an immediate right side 432R or left side 432L thereof. As such, when the elastomeric ring 432 is compressed vertically, a portion thereof elastically expands or migrates radially outward, inward or both. A void 480 is provided, e.g., between the elastomeric ring 432 and the skirt 325 of the lid 320 to provide “living space” for the ring material to radially expand when the second seal 464 is engaged.
First, it results in tempering the vertical spring force between the elastomer and the rim. While it is desired that some slight spring force is provided to strengthen or reinforce the first seal, excessive spring force may tend to reduce the opening force to an extent that the container may inadvertently pop open. A balance must be struck between a desirably low opening force on the one hand (especially for elderly and/or diabetic users) and an opening force that is so low that it can result in inadvertent container openings, e.g., via common pressure variations that may occur within the container during transport. When the elastomer is permitted to expand radially, the vertical spring force may thus be provided at an acceptable level.
The second important function is that the surface area of contact between the sealing surfaces of the second seal increases via radial expansion of the ring's elastomeric material. This increase of the elastomer-to-thermoplastic sealing surface area provides a tighter seal at the site of engagement of the second seal.
It should be understood that any of the seal configurations disclosed in
Ingress Performance for the seal alone is measured by taking the total vial ingress rate and subtracting out the MVTR (moisture vapor transmission rate) through the thermoplastic comprising the outer shell of the vial.
In an exemplary embodiment, when the lid is in the closed position, the moisture vapor transmission rate MVTR is less than 370 μg/day at 30° C./80% RH (relative humidity). In an exemplary embodiment of a 24 ml vial according to embodiments of the invention, the weight of a desiccant entrained three phase polymer sleeve is 2.5-3.25 grams (optionally about 3.0 g) and the moisture ingress is about 400 micrograms per day at 30° C./70% RH. In an exemplary embodiment of a 17 ml vial according to embodiments of the invention, the weight of a desiccant entrained three phase polymer sleeve is 2.0-2.75 grams (optionally about 2.5 g) and the moisture ingress is about 300 micrograms per day at 30° C./70% RH. The term “three phase polymer” refers to a desiccant entrained polymer comprising a base polymer, desiccant and channeling agent, e.g., as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,911,937, 6,080,350, 6,124,006, 6,130,263, 6,194,079, 6,214,255, 6,486,231, 7,005,459, and U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 2016/0039955, each of which is incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth. Advantageously, in an optional aspect of the invention, the second seal permits reduced use of such desiccant material, resulting in lower manufacturing costs.
Broadly speaking, the term “moisture-tight” is defined as having a moisture ingress (after three days) of less than 1500 μg of water, in another embodiment, less than 500 μg of water, in a further embodiment, less than 300 μg of water, in yet another embodiment, less than 150 μg of water, as determined by the following test method: (a) place one gram plus or minus 0.25 grams of molecular sieve in the container and record the weight; (b) fully close the container; (c) place the closed container in an environmental chamber at conditions of 80% relative humidity and 72° F.; (d) after one day, weigh the container containing the molecular sieve; (e) after four days, weigh the container containing the molecular sieve; and (f) subtract the first day sample from the fourth day sample to calculate the moisture ingress of the container in units of micrograms of water.
In an exemplary embodiment, when the first seal and the second seal combined provide the container when the lid is in the closed position a lower MVTR than the first seal would provide without the second seal.
In an exemplary embodiment, when the first seal and the second seal combined provide the container when the lid is in the closed position a lower MVTR than the second seal would provide without the first seal.
In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the container is used for storing diagnostic test strips.
In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, at least one of the thermoplastic-to-thermoplastic sealing surfaces is on a radially-projecting rim along an outside of the body.
In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the elastomer has a Shore A hardness from 20 to 50, preferably from 20 to 40, more preferably from 20 to 35. A skilled person in the art of injection molding would typically avoid using TPE materials with less than 50 shore A hardness for container seals. This is because such soft TPE materials are generally difficult to adhere to the base polymer without damaging or displacing the seal during molding. However, through molding techniques that Applicants developed, use of TPE materials with a hardness of less than 50 shore A for a container seal is made possible. Use of such low durometer material creates lower resistance to flow during molding, advantageously creates lower resistance to flow during molding, enabling a thinner cross section. It is less prone to creating knit lines in the finished seal that could adversely impact seal integrity. In addition, the softer TPE material requires less compression force to seal, which reduces the likelihood of excessive vertical spring force, which could otherwise result in inadvertent opening of the container as discussed above.
In the design of a flip top container the cap opening force is a critical to quality characteristic of the product. The acceptable range of opening force is 3 to 7 lbf (pound-force) when measured by affixing the body of the vial standing on the vial base and then applying an upward force to the underside of the bill of the cap, parallel to the axis of the vial at a constant speed of 500 mm/min at a controlled temperature of 20+/−2° C., with a preferred range of 4 to 6 lbf. As discussed above, a container that is too easy to open may open inadvertently and a container with an opening force above this range may be too difficult for the user to open.
The resistance to opening under differential pressure can optionally be measured by placing a container which has been opened and closed in the ambient environment into a sealed chamber and then reducing the external pressure in the chamber over a period of 30 seconds to one minute to create a differential pressure between the interior of the container and the external environment of at least 450 mBar, which is the maximum pressure differential a container should be exposed to during commercial air transportation.
In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the elastomer has a thickness of from 0.5 mm to 1.25 mm and optionally an exposed width of the outside vial rim is from 0 mm to 2.5 mm.
A vial in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention may be recycled after use. The recycling references the primary material and the chasing arrow corresponds to that recycle class. The vial lid seal with thermoplastic elastomer is designed with a lower mass of elastomer to still allow the container to be re-used/recycled along with the primary material designation.
An additional elastomer seal thus reduces the moisture vapor transmission rate through the vial container lid seal to allow less required desiccant mass. A combination of seals working in series enables reduced moisture vapor transmission, in combination with low lid opening and closing force to optimize the consumer experience. A low mass of elastomer within the vial lid seal to allow vial re-use/recyclability of the vial's primary material.
It is noted that while exemplary embodiments are shown as round containers with round seals, the invention is not limited thereto. It is contemplated that the present invention can also be utilized in the context of non-round flip-top containers to improve seal integrity between body and lid. In fact, it is contemplated that the elastomer-to-thermoplastic seals described herein would be particularly useful in enhancing seal integrity for non-round containers. For example, the first and second seals as disclosed herein may be utilized in elliptical containers, square containers, rectangular containers, quadrilateral containers with rounded corners and many other shapes. Optionally, embodiments of the present invention are utilized with container shapes and configurations disclosed in U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 2011/0127269, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
It is further noted that the thermoplastic-to-thermoplastic seal (e.g., the first seal 462) is not necessarily limited to the configuration as shown in the accompanying drawing figures. For example, in an optional aspect, the thermoplastic-to-thermoplastic seal may be provided between an inner polymer ring depending from the underside of the lid base and interfacing with a portion of the inner surface of the container body wall. Optionally, in such an embodiment, an annular protrusion of the inner polymer ring engages a radial undercut within the inner surface of the container body wall to create a variation of the first seal 462 disclosed with respect to
The invention will be illustrated in more detail with reference to the following Examples, but it should be understood that the present invention is not deemed to be limited thereto.
Tests were run to measure moisture ingress of 24 ml vials according to the container embodiment shown in
As the data show, the addition of the second seal resulted in a meaningful reduction of the mean ingress and a surprisingly significant reduction in the standard deviation of moisture ingress. This significant reduction in standard deviation is notable and important from a production standpoint. Essentially, the second seal in combination with the first seal allows for a much more controlled and predictable (i.e., lower variation) in moisture ingress so that container moisture budgets can be much more precisely met. This allows for a reduction in desiccant material necessary per vial and hence a reduction in production costs associated with the reduced amount of desiccant material.
Tests were run to measure moisture ingress of 17 ml vials according to the container embodiment shown in
As with Example 1, the data show that addition of the second seal resulted in a meaningful reduction of the mean ingress and a surprisingly significant reduction in the standard deviation of moisture ingress.
While the invention has been described in detail and with reference to specific examples thereof, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope thereof.
This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/834,176 filed Mar. 30, 2020, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/081,597 filed Aug. 31, 2018, which granted as U.S. Pat. No. 10,669,079, which is a U.S. National Phase of International Application No. PCT/US2017/021010 filed Mar. 6, 2017, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/419,275 filed Nov. 8, 2016 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/303,483 filed Mar. 4, 2016, all of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1192135 | Stone | Jul 1916 | A |
2733829 | Lewitt | Feb 1956 | A |
3275180 | Optner | Sep 1966 | A |
3323671 | Minarik, Jr. et al. | Jun 1967 | A |
3415405 | Rausing et al. | Dec 1968 | A |
3419179 | Fritz | Dec 1968 | A |
3441161 | Baarn | Apr 1969 | A |
3593909 | Bergmann | Jul 1971 | A |
3891118 | Laurizio | Jun 1975 | A |
4022352 | Pehr | May 1977 | A |
4061226 | Essen | Dec 1977 | A |
4089432 | Crankshaw et al. | May 1978 | A |
4132225 | Whattam | Jan 1979 | A |
4291818 | Nozawa et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4403712 | Wiesinger | Sep 1983 | A |
4457458 | Heinol | Jul 1984 | A |
4545508 | Cribb, Jr. et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4718571 | Bordner | Jan 1988 | A |
4783056 | Abrams | Nov 1988 | A |
4911337 | Rosenthal | Mar 1990 | A |
4936494 | Weidman | Jun 1990 | A |
4941592 | Kitterman | Jul 1990 | A |
4942966 | Kemp | Jul 1990 | A |
5038957 | Gross | Aug 1991 | A |
D331878 | Forsyth | Dec 1992 | S |
D334538 | Bolen, Jr. et al. | Apr 1993 | S |
RE34263 | vanKerkhoven et al. | May 1993 | E |
D339065 | Forsyth et al. | Sep 1993 | S |
D340187 | Forsyth | Oct 1993 | S |
5294015 | Landis | Mar 1994 | A |
5295599 | Smith | Mar 1994 | A |
5312011 | Fischer | May 1994 | A |
5330082 | Forsyth | Jul 1994 | A |
5499736 | Kohl | Mar 1996 | A |
5667094 | Rapchak et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5769253 | Gross | Jun 1998 | A |
5788064 | Sacherer et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5810197 | Mazzarolo | Sep 1998 | A |
5911937 | Hekal | Jun 1999 | A |
6039197 | Braun | Mar 2000 | A |
6050441 | Kuo | Apr 2000 | A |
6080350 | Hekal | Jun 2000 | A |
6124006 | Hekal | Sep 2000 | A |
6130263 | Hekal | Oct 2000 | A |
6170696 | Tucker et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6192895 | Yuhara | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6194079 | Hekal | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6214255 | Hekal | Apr 2001 | B1 |
D448296 | Bried et al. | Sep 2001 | S |
6299033 | Verweyst et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
RE37634 | Hickman et al. | Apr 2002 | E |
6371319 | Yeaton et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6401957 | Przytulla | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6486231 | Hekal | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6510971 | Martin | Jan 2003 | B1 |
D476892 | Martin et al. | Jul 2003 | S |
6705463 | Bucholtz et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6752092 | Beallie et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
D509426 | Samz et al. | Sep 2005 | S |
7005459 | Hekal | Feb 2006 | B2 |
D529800 | Liebe | Oct 2006 | S |
7597853 | West et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7819267 | Kick | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8083094 | Caulfield et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8297457 | Kick | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8470230 | Caulfield et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8881942 | Giraud | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8899443 | Soibel | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9475619 | Procter | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9532636 | Jung | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9718587 | Harada et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9834341 | Giraud | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9956560 | Landes | May 2018 | B2 |
11498737 | Weir | Nov 2022 | B1 |
20020104849 | Giraud | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020125203 | Bried et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020148846 | Luburic | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020175173 | Diesterbeck | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030087015 | Wyslotsky et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040124200 | Yuhara | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040173612 | Giraud | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040245261 | Stanos et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050023183 | Banik et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050067313 | Banik et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050258180 | Lown | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20070193891 | Portier | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070205196 | Burney et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070262044 | Richir | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080035658 | Caulfield et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080197134 | Maxwell | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090084805 | Bryson et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20110000930 | Logel et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110127269 | Bucholtz et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120024856 | Smyers | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120211493 | Daggett | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130068765 | Procter | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130161345 | Tatin | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130256329 | Belfance et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140319149 | Freedman et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140319162 | Bois | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150008223 | Harada et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150368003 | Freedman et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150375918 | Holderness et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160039955 | Klein et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160130045 | Giraud et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160318677 | Schneider | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170108486 | Joseph | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170139216 | Crenko | May 2017 | A1 |
20180362224 | Philip | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190344943 | Gröner | Nov 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102026890 | Apr 2011 | CN |
102795392 | Nov 2012 | CN |
203064396 | Jul 2013 | CN |
103648922 | Mar 2014 | CN |
104053610 | Sep 2014 | CN |
104995101 | Oct 2015 | CN |
20006093 | Sep 2000 | DE |
09525088 | Oct 1999 | EP |
1805088 | Apr 2006 | EP |
2548466 | Jan 2013 | EP |
2796386 | Oct 2014 | EP |
2151591 | Jul 1985 | GB |
5298272 | Oct 1994 | JP |
H11075933 | Mar 1999 | JP |
2004136933 | May 2004 | JP |
2007304098 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2004000680 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2005074571 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2006045087 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2014116622 | Jul 2014 | WO |
2014204890 | Dec 2014 | WO |
2016022744 | Feb 2016 | WO |
2016060755 | Apr 2016 | WO |
2016173891 | Nov 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report issued in PCT/US2017/021010, dated Apr. 20, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220355983 A1 | Nov 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62419275 | Nov 2016 | US | |
62303483 | Mar 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16834176 | Mar 2020 | US |
Child | 17454649 | US | |
Parent | 16081597 | US | |
Child | 16834176 | US |