The present application is a U.S. National Stage Application of International Application No. PCT/US2015/029750 filed May 7, 2015, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
The present disclosure relates generally to transferring solid or liquid bulk materials for well operations, and more particularly, to a stackable container delivery system for providing bulk materials into a blender.
During the drilling and completion of oil and gas wells, various wellbore treating fluids are used for a number of purposes. For example, high viscosity gels are used to create fractures in oil and gas bearing formations to increase production. High viscosity and high density gels are also used to maintain positive hydrostatic pressure in the well while limiting flow of well fluids into earth formations during installation of completion equipment. High viscosity fluids are used to flow sand into wells during gravel packing operations. The high viscosity fluids are normally produced by mixing dry powder and/or granular materials and agents with water at the well site as they are needed for the particular treatment. Systems for metering and mixing the various materials are normally portable, e.g., skid- or truck-mounted, since they are needed for only short periods of time at a well site.
The powder or granular treating material is normally transported to a well site in a commercial or common carrier tank truck. Once the tank truck and mixing system are at the well site, the dry powder material (bulk material) must be transferred or conveyed from the tank truck into a supply tank for metering into a blender as needed. The bulk material is usually transferred from the tank truck pneumatically. More specifically, the bulk material is blown pneumatically from the tank truck into an on-location storage/delivery system (e.g., silo). The storage/delivery system may then deliver the bulk material onto a conveyor or into a hopper, which meters the bulk material through a chute into a blender tub.
The pneumatic conveying process used to deliver bulk material from the tank truck can be a time-consuming process. In addition, some well locations are arranged without a large amount of space to accommodate tank trucks, such that only a limited number of available tank trucks can be positioned to pneumatically fill the storage/delivery system at a given time. Accordingly, the pneumatic conveying process can lead to dead time of equipment usage and relatively high detention costs or demurrage costs associated with the tank trucks, hoses, and related equipment that are on-location during this time.
Furthermore, during the pneumatic conveying process, the bulk material is moved from the tank truck to the storage/delivery system in a turbulent manner, leading to large amounts of dust and noise generation. The air used for conveying the material must be vented from the storage tank and typically carries an undesirable amount of dust with it. Attempts to control dust during the conveying process typically involve the rig up and use of auxiliary equipment, such as a dust collector and duct work, adding cost to the material handling operations. In addition, traditional material handling systems can have several transfer points between the outlets of multiple storage/delivery systems and a blender. These transfer points often have to be shrouded and ventilated to prevent an undesirable release of dust into the environment. Further, after the dust has been captured using the dust collectors and ventilation systems, additional steps are needed to dispose of the dust.
For a more complete understanding of the present disclosure and its features and advantages, reference is now made to the following description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Illustrative embodiments of the present disclosure are described in detail herein. In the interest of clarity, not all features of an actual implementation are described in this specification. It will of course be appreciated that in the development of any such actual embodiment, numerous implementation specific decisions must be made to achieve developers' specific goals, such as compliance with system related and business related constraints, which will vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it will be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking for those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of the present disclosure. Furthermore, in no way should the following examples be read to limit, or define, the scope of the disclosure.
Certain embodiments according to the present disclosure may be directed to systems and methods for managing bulk material (e.g., bulk solid or liquid material used on location) efficiently at a well site. More specifically, the disclosed embodiments are directed to systems and methods for efficiently moving bulk material into a blender receptacle associated with a blender on location, which could be into a blender hopper or directly into a mixing tub of the blender. The present disclosure may include a system that utilizes one or more containers (e.g., pre-filled containers or filled on location) holding bulk material and arranged around the blender receptacle to transfer bulk material from the containers directly into the blender receptacle. The disclosed techniques may be used to efficiently handle any desirable bulk material having a solid or liquid constituency including, but not limited to, sand, proppant, gel particulate, dry-gel particulate, liquid additives and others.
In currently existing on-site bulk material handling applications, dry material (e.g., sand, proppant, gel particulate, or dry-gel particulate) may be used during the formation of treatment fluids. In such applications, the bulk material is transferred between transportation units, storage tanks, blenders, and other on-site components. The bulk material is often transferred pneumatically using pressurized air flows to provide the bulk material, for example, from a transportation unit (e.g., tank truck) to a storage/delivery system (e.g., silo). The bulk material may later be moved from the storage/delivery system to a hopper on a blender truck. A sand screw, chute, or other metering mechanism disposed in the hopper then meters the bulk material into a mixing tub of the blender, where the bulk material is mixed with other materials (e.g., water, fluids, chemicals, etc.). In some instances, the bulk material can be transferred pneumatically from a transportation unit into a storage tank on the blender truck.
Pneumatic transfer methods are generally selected due to the simplicity of the process. However, certain inherent inefficiencies are associated with the above-described pneumatic transfer of bulk material at a well site. First, blowing the bulk material pneumatically from a transportation unit to a storage/delivery system is a time consuming process, taking at least an hour to empty a single truck. Although the pneumatic process of blowing bulk material into a storage container can be accomplished prior to using the bulk material in blender operations, the long amount of time spent pneumatically transferring the bulk material to the storage/delivery system can lead to high equipment/detention costs. Detention costs are associated with the transportation equipment (e.g., tank trucks) being positioned on location for a period of time. In some instances, the equipment on location may be arranged so that accessibility to storage/delivery systems is limited for transportation units being used to pneumatically fill the storage/delivery systems. As a result, a large amount of time can be wasted by trucks waiting to move into position as other trucks are unloading bulk material, or trucks waiting for the material already in a storage bin to be used to make room for the next load of material.
In addition, the pneumatic transfer of bulk material tends to require a large amount of air to move the material through the system. As this volume of air vents to the atmosphere, fine dust particles are entrained and released. It is undesirable for this dust to be released into the atmosphere. Accordingly, existing systems employ dust control techniques that often utilize large pieces of additional equipment, separate power supplies, and complicated setups. In addition, the pneumatic transfer process, as well as the systems used to control dust, can lead to an undesirable level of noise produced during bulk material transfer.
The bulk material container systems disclosed herein are designed to address and eliminate these shortcomings. The presently disclosed techniques use a plurality of pre-filled, portable containers, instead of a pneumatic transfer process, to move the bulk material from a transportation unit to the blender receptacle (e.g., blender hopper or mixer). The transportation unit may deliver one or more containers of bulk material to the well site, where the containers may then be arranged on a platform (e.g., stand, rack structure) around the blender receptacle. The one or more containers may include gravity feed outlets extending therefrom, and these outlets may be used to route bulk material from the containers directly into the blender receptacle.
In some embodiments, the containers may be stacked one over another. The stacked containers may be connected such that bulk material may be dispensed directly from one upper container into the next lower container (e.g., via a chute, hatch, opening, etc.), and so forth. A gravity feed outlet may extend from the bottom container in each container stack, to route bulk material from the one or more containers in the stack directly into the blender receptacle. In other embodiments, individual gravity feed outlets may extend from each of the containers in the stack to route bulk material selectively from each of the containers in the stack directly into the blender receptacle. Since the transportation unit is able to unload the stackable containers of bulk material without pneumatic transfer, the stackable containers may be used to more efficiently transfer bulk material to the blender.
The stackable container systems and methods described herein may reduce detention costs associated with bulk material handling at the location, since the efficient filling process may enable a quicker offloading of each tank truck, as compared to those that rely on pneumatic transfer. In addition, by eliminating the pneumatic conveyance process entirely, the stackable container system may reduce the amount of dust generated at the location, as well as the noise levels associated with the bulk material transfer. The reduced dust generation may allow a reduction in the size of various dust control equipment used to ventilate the material handling system, leading to a reduction in overall cost, footprint, and rig-up time of the dust control equipment.
Turning now to the drawings,
Water and other additives may be supplied to the mixer 20 (e.g., mixing compartment) through an inlet 24. The bulk material and water may be mixed in the mixer 20 to produce (at an outlet 26) a fracing fluid, gel, cement slurry, drilling mud, or any other fluid mixture for use on location. The outlet 26 may be coupled to a pump for conveying the treating fluid into a well (e.g., a hydrocarbon recovery well) for a treating process. It should be noted that the disclosed container stack 12 may be utilized to provide bulk material for use in a variety of treating processes. For example, the disclosed systems and methods may be utilized to provide proppant materials into fracture treatments performed on a hydrocarbon recovery well. In other embodiments, the disclosed techniques may be used to provide other materials (e.g., non-proppant) for diversions, conductor-frac applications, cement mixing, drilling mud mixing, and other fluid mixing applications.
The container stack 12 may include one container 28 holding bulk material, this container 28 being elevated (e.g., on a platform 29) above a receiving portion of the blender 16 and stackable with at least another container. Although only one container stack 12 is illustrated, other embodiments may include several container stacks 12 (having at least one container 28) disposed near the blender 16. In the illustrated embodiment where the stack 12 features just one container 28, the container 28 may be replaceable such that once the bulk material from the container stack 12 runs low, a new container 28 may be placed on the platform 29 to maintain a steady flow of bulk material to the blender 16. In other embodiments, the container 28 may be integral with the platform 29 so that, when the bulk material from the container stack 12 runs low, a new container 28 featuring an integral platform 29 may be used to replace the empty container 28/platform 29.
A portable bulk storage system 30 may be provided at the well site for storing one or more additional containers 28 of bulk material to be used in the container stack 12. The bulk material containers 28 may be transported to the well site on a transportation unit (e.g., truck). The bulk storage system 30 may be the transportation unit itself or may be a skid, a pallet, or some other holding area. Before a treatment begins, one or more containers 28 of bulk material may be transferred from the storage system 30 to the container stack 12, as indicated by the arrow 32. This transfer may be performed by lifting the container 28 via a hoisting mechanism, such as a forklift or a crane.
After one or more of the containers 28 in the container stack 12 are emptied, the empty upper container(s) 28 may be removed via a hoisting mechanism. In some embodiments, the one or more empty containers 28 may be positioned on another bulk storage system 30 (e.g., a transportation unit, a skid, a pallet, or some other holding area) until they can be removed from the well site and/or refilled. In other embodiments, the one or more empty containers 28 may be positioned directly onto a transportation unit for transporting the empty containers 28 away from the well site. It should be noted that the same transportation unit used to provide one or more filled containers 28 to the well site may then be utilized to remove one or more empty containers from the well site.
The term “blender receptacle” used herein may refer to any number of tubs, hoppers, mixers, and other areas where bulk material is needed. As mentioned above, the blender receptacle 50 may be associated with a blender disposed at the well site. For example, the blender receptacle 50 may be a blender hopper (e.g., hopper 18 of
As illustrated, each of the container stacks 12 may include just a single container 28. Single container stacks 12 may be utilized when a relatively small amount of bulk material is needed for a particular well treatment. In addition, single container stacks 12 may be utilized when height restrictions prevent a hoisting mechanism (e.g., forklift) from positioning additional containers 28 onto the stacks 12. When single container stacks 12 such as these are used, additional stacks 12 may be positioned around the receiving bin 50 to provide a desired quantity of bulk material to the receiving bin 50.
As mentioned above, in some embodiments the gravity feed outlets 52 for the containers 28 may be chutes for routing bulk material directly from a lower end of the container 28 to the top of the blender receptacle 50. However, other types of the gravity feed outlets 52 may be used in other embodiments. For example,
In some embodiments, the holding tank 60 may be sectioned off so that each section of the holding tank 60 functions as a gravity feed outlet 52 for bulk material flowing from a respective container 28 disposed above the particular section. In other embodiments, the holding tank 60 may itself function as a single gravity feed outlet for all of the containers 28 disposed above the holding tank 60.
Another embodiment of the container stacks 12 that may be used to provide bulk material directly into the receiving bin 50 is illustrated in
In addition, one or more of the container stacks 12 disposed around the blender receptacle 50 may include just a single stackable container 28. The single container 28 may be used in a stack 12, for example, when less than one container full of a certain bulk material is needed for a particular well treatment, while more than one of the container full of another bulk material is needed from the other stacks 12. As illustrated, the single container 28 may be positioned proximate the receiving bin 50 with its gravity feed outlet 52 extending into the receiving bin 50. The other stacks 12 may each include an outlet 52 extending from the lowest container 28a of the stack 12, to dispense bulk material from the container stacks 12 directly into the blender receptacle 50. As discussed in detail below, other embodiments of the container stack 12 may include gravity feed outlets extending from both the upper and lower containers 28 directly to the blender receptacle 50.
Each container 28 in the container stack 12 may hold the same type, particle size, and/or material of bulk material in some embodiments. In other embodiments, the containers 28 in the stack 12 may hold different types, particle sizes, and/or materials of bulk material. Similarly, different stacks 12 disposed around the blender 16 may hold different types, particle sizes, and/or material of bulk material. These different bulk materials may be used to provide a desired treating fluid for the treating process being performed. For example, when performing fracturing operations, it may be desirable to initially pump a treating fluid having smaller proppant particles downhole, to start opening perforations formed within the well. After this, the fracturing treatment may proceed to pumping a treating fluid with large proppant particles downhole, to expand the openings in the perforations. In some embodiments, the large proppant particles may be supplied from one stack 12 after the smaller proppant is used from another stack 12. In other embodiments, the large proppant may be supplied from one container 28 (e.g., upper container 28b) within a stack 12 after the smaller proppant particles are used from the other container 28 (e.g., lower container 28a) in the stack 12.
As illustrated and described above with reference to
In
The containers 28, both individually and within their stacks 12, may utilize a choke-feed mode to meter the bulk material into the blender receptacle 50. In
In the two-container stacks of
A more detailed description of the choke feed established by one or more of the containers 28 in the stacks 12 of
In general, the gravity feed outlet 52 may extend from one or more of the containers 28 in a given stack 12 to the blender receptacle 50 such that additional bulk material is discharged from the outlet 52 at a fill level of the bulk material already present in the blender receptacle 50. When an outlet valve or dumping mechanism on the container 28 is actuated, the top of the outlet 52 may be opened and kept open while the outlet 52 fills the blender receptacle 50. The bulk material may travel down the outlet 52 and be discharged into the blender receptacle 50 under a force due to gravity working on the bulk material. In embodiments where solid bulk material is used, an angle of repose of the bulk material in the blender receptacle 50 may affect the flow rate of material from the outlet 52.
In some embodiments (e.g.,
In some embodiments, the lower containers 28a may hold a first type, particle size, or material of bulk material (A), while the upper containers 28b may hold a second type, particle size, or material of bulk material (B). The bulk material A may be the same or different from the bulk material B. In
In other embodiments, each container stack 12 may include one or more containers 28 holding the same type, particle size, and material of bulk material. Additionally, each container stack 12 may be used to supply a different type of bulk material to the blender receptacle 50. For example, the stack 12 in
In the embodiments of
A top view of the arrangement of containers stacks 12 of
Another arrangement of containers stacks 12 is illustrated in
Arranging the container stacks 12 on just one side of the blender receptacle 50 may enable a more efficient use of space at the well site. This arrangement may also enable transportation units (e.g., trucks) to more efficiently maneuver through the well site, as they only need to park on a single side of the blender receptacle 50 to provide new containers 28 to the container stacks 12 and/or to receive empty containers that are being removed from the stacks 12.
The containers 28 used in the container stacks 12 described above may be any desirable shape. For example, the containers 28 may be squared (as shown in
In some embodiments, the containers 28 may include one or more Super Sack® containers. When using these types of containers 28, the automatic dumping may be achieved by moving the sack across a sharp blade. Once the bulk material is transferred therefrom, the empty sacks may be removed and deposited in a trash bin. In other embodiments, the containers 28 may include one or more reusable sacks with a relatively stronger construction that enables the sacks to be refilled off location. That way, the sacks can later be returned to and re-used as containers 28 in the container stacks 12. These reusable sacks may be constructed as larger than existing Super Sacks and designed so they can be filled from the top and emptied out of the bottom.
In some embodiments, the containers 28 may be partially or fully enclosed to guard the bulk material against the elements (e.g., sun, rain, and other weather). The containers 28 may be equipped with additional side walls disposed around the internal volume of the containers 28, for aesthetic reasons as well as to enable easier cleanup after the container 28 is emptied and removed from the stack 12. That is, any dust generated from within the internal volume of the container 28 may be contained within the additional side walls and enclosed portions and then subsequently removed or filtered, to prevent undesirable dust accumulation outside the container 28. In some embodiments, the containers 28 may be constructed with one or more coupling mechanisms (e.g., hooks, latches, slots) to enable engagement between the container 28 and a hoisting mechanism (e.g., crane, forklift, etc.) used to raise or lower the container 28.
Bulk material inventory tracking may be generally desired at the well site. As shown in
As noted above, the inventory control system 72 may include a number of different sensors 70. In some embodiments, these sensors 70 may include one or more load cells or bin full switches for tracking a level of bulk material in a container 28 and indicating whether a container 28 is empty, full, or partially full. Such sensors 70 may be used for any given container 28, the blender receptacle 50, a silo (not shown), or any other component at the well site. In addition, in some embodiments the sensors 70 may include RFID tags used to provide an indication of the particle size, bulk volume, weight, type, material, and/or supplier of the bulk material disposed in a certain container 28. In such instances, the controller 72 may be communicatively coupled to an RFID reader disposed in proximity to the containers 28 being moved about the well site.
In some embodiments, the containers 28 may include one or more electronic sensors 70 used to determine and indicate whether the container 28 is full or empty. As noted above, such electronic sensors 70 may be communicatively coupled (e.g., wirelessly) to an automated control system 72. The sensors 70 may instruct the system 10 or operators to proceed to the next available container when an “empty” or “nearly empty” signal is detected. In other embodiments, the containers 28 may be equipped with a mechanical sensor or mechanical indicator for indicating whether the container 28 is full or empty.
It may be particularly desirable for the upper (B) containers 28b of
As described above, the disclosed system utilizes several relatively small, independent containers 28 to hold the bulk material needed for a well treatment, instead of a pneumatically filled silo. This arrangement of individual containers 28 may provide relatively easy methods for transporting the bulk material around the well site. For example, the containers 28 may enable quick unloading of a transportation unit and quick loading/re-loading of the container stacks 12 using a forklift or other hoisting mechanism. This type of unloading/loading may be accomplished more efficiently than a pneumatic loading process. In addition, the containers 28 may be quickly pushed out of the way and removed from the container stacks 12 once emptied. The smaller volumes of bulk material provided in the containers 28 may enable a relatively rapid change of the type of bulk material delivered to the blender receptacle 50, allowing for quick customization of the well treatment. The multiple containers 28 (particularly when arranged in multiple stacks 12 feeding into the same blender receptacle 50) may provide a buffer for bulk material delivery so that the blender receptacle 50 is constantly being supplied with bulk material while transportation units are arriving and being unloaded at the well site. Furthermore, once the treatments are completed at the well site, any remainder of filled containers 28 may be easily hauled away or otherwise removed from location.
By making the bulk material unloading/loading process on location more efficient, the disclosed techniques may reduce the detention costs accrued at the well site, since transportation units may be able to unload their materials faster than would be possible using pneumatics. In addition, the disclosed techniques may enable the transfer of bulk material on location without generating excessive noise that would otherwise be produced through a pneumatic loading process. Still further, the bulk material remains in the individual containers 28 until it is output directly into the blender receptacle 50 via the container stack 12 and corresponding gravity feed outlet 52. Since the bulk material remains in the containers 28, instead of being released onto a conveyor, the container stacks 12 may enable movement of bulk material on location without generating a large amount of dust.
Although the present disclosure and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure as defined by the following claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2015/029750 | 5/7/2015 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/178695 | 11/10/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
710611 | Ray | Oct 1902 | A |
722782 | Weaver | Mar 1903 | A |
829127 | Strauss | Aug 1906 | A |
833790 | Miles | Oct 1906 | A |
890641 | Hains | Jun 1908 | A |
894749 | Von Siller | Jul 1908 | A |
917646 | Otto | Apr 1909 | A |
1029126 | Hoover | Jun 1912 | A |
1047680 | Mills | Dec 1912 | A |
1051883 | Hains | Feb 1913 | A |
1224656 | McCandliss | May 1917 | A |
1405707 | Beers | Feb 1922 | A |
1519153 | Mitton | Sep 1923 | A |
1726603 | Wallace | Sep 1929 | A |
1795987 | Adams | Mar 1931 | A |
1798423 | Vogel-Jorgensen | Mar 1931 | A |
2138172 | Johnson | Nov 1938 | A |
2231911 | Hitt et al. | Feb 1941 | A |
2281497 | Hyson et al. | Apr 1942 | A |
2385245 | Willoughby | Sep 1945 | A |
2415782 | Zademach | Feb 1947 | A |
2513012 | Dugas | Jun 1950 | A |
2563470 | Kane | Aug 1951 | A |
2652174 | Shea | Sep 1953 | A |
2670866 | Glesby | Mar 1954 | A |
2678737 | Mangrum | May 1954 | A |
2759737 | Manning | Aug 1956 | A |
2802603 | McCray | Aug 1957 | A |
2867336 | Soldini et al. | Jan 1959 | A |
2873036 | Noble | Feb 1959 | A |
3049248 | Heltzel et al. | Aug 1962 | A |
3083879 | Coleman | Apr 1963 | A |
3151779 | Rensch et al. | Oct 1964 | A |
3203370 | Friedrich et al. | Aug 1965 | A |
3217927 | Bale, Jr. et al. | Nov 1965 | A |
3318473 | Jones et al. | May 1967 | A |
3326572 | Murray | Jun 1967 | A |
3343688 | Ross | Sep 1967 | A |
3354918 | Coleman | Nov 1967 | A |
3380333 | Clay et al. | Apr 1968 | A |
3404963 | Fritsche et al. | Oct 1968 | A |
3410530 | Gilman | Nov 1968 | A |
3432151 | O'Loughlin et al. | Mar 1969 | A |
3467408 | Regalia | Sep 1969 | A |
3476270 | Cox et al. | Nov 1969 | A |
3602400 | Cooke | Aug 1971 | A |
3627555 | Driscoll | Dec 1971 | A |
3698693 | Poncet | Oct 1972 | A |
3785534 | Smith | Jan 1974 | A |
3802584 | Sackett, Sr. et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3986708 | Heltzel et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4023719 | Noyon | May 1977 | A |
4058239 | Van Mill | Nov 1977 | A |
4138163 | Calvert et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4178117 | Brugler | Dec 1979 | A |
4204773 | Bates | May 1980 | A |
4248337 | Zimmer | Feb 1981 | A |
4258953 | Johnson | Mar 1981 | A |
4313708 | Tiliakos | Feb 1982 | A |
4395052 | Rash | Jul 1983 | A |
4398653 | Daloisio | Aug 1983 | A |
4423884 | Gevers | Jan 1984 | A |
4473175 | Zengaffinen | Sep 1984 | A |
4544279 | Rudolph | Oct 1985 | A |
4548507 | Mathis et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4583663 | Bonerb | Apr 1986 | A |
4626166 | Jolly | Dec 1986 | A |
4701095 | Berryman et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4806065 | Holt et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4850702 | Arribau et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4854714 | Davis | Aug 1989 | A |
4856681 | Murray | Aug 1989 | A |
4900157 | Stegemoeller et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4919540 | Stegemoeller et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4956821 | Fenelon | Sep 1990 | A |
4993883 | Jones | Feb 1991 | A |
4997335 | Prince | Mar 1991 | A |
5036979 | Selz | Aug 1991 | A |
5096096 | Calaunan | Mar 1992 | A |
5114169 | Botkin et al. | May 1992 | A |
5149192 | Hamm et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5303998 | Whitlatch et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5339996 | Dubbert et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5343813 | Septer | Sep 1994 | A |
5375730 | Bahr et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5401129 | Eatinger | Mar 1995 | A |
5413154 | Hurst, Jr. et al. | May 1995 | A |
5426137 | Allen | Jun 1995 | A |
5441321 | Karpisek | Aug 1995 | A |
5443350 | Wilson | Aug 1995 | A |
5445289 | Owen | Aug 1995 | A |
5590976 | Kilheffer et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5609417 | Otte | Mar 1997 | A |
5722552 | Olson | Mar 1998 | A |
5772390 | Walker | Jun 1998 | A |
5806441 | Chung | Sep 1998 | A |
5913459 | Gill et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5915913 | Greenlaw et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5927356 | Henderson | Jul 1999 | A |
5944470 | Bonerb | Aug 1999 | A |
5997099 | Collins | Dec 1999 | A |
6059372 | McDonald et al. | May 2000 | A |
6112946 | Bennett et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126307 | Black et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6193402 | Grimland et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6247594 | Garton | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6379086 | Goth | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6425627 | Gee | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6481883 | Ellen | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6491421 | Rondeau et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6517232 | Blue | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6536939 | Blue | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6537015 | Lim et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6568567 | McKenzie et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6622849 | Sperling | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6655548 | McClure, Jr. et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6876904 | Oberg | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6980914 | Bivens et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7008163 | Russell | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7086342 | O'Neall et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7100896 | Cox | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7114905 | Dibdin | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7252309 | Soon et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7284579 | Elgan | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7351025 | Galijan | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7451015 | Mazur et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7475796 | Garton | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7500817 | Furrer et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7513280 | Brashears et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7665788 | Dibdin et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7762281 | Schuld | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7997213 | Gauthier et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8387824 | Wietgrefe | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8434990 | Claussen | May 2013 | B2 |
D688349 | Oren et al. | Aug 2013 | S |
D688350 | Oren et al. | Aug 2013 | S |
D688351 | Oren et al. | Aug 2013 | S |
D688772 | Oren et al. | Aug 2013 | S |
8505780 | Oren | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8545148 | Wanek-Pusset et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8573917 | Renyer | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8585341 | Oren | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8607289 | Brown et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8616370 | Allegretti et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8622251 | Oren | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8662525 | Dierks et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8668430 | Oren et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
D703582 | Oren | Apr 2014 | S |
8827118 | Oren | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8834012 | Case et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8887914 | Allegretti et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
RE45713 | Oren et al. | Oct 2015 | E |
9162603 | Oren | Oct 2015 | B2 |
RE45788 | Oren et al. | Nov 2015 | E |
9248772 | Oren | Feb 2016 | B2 |
RE45914 | Oren et al. | Mar 2016 | E |
9296518 | Oren | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9340353 | Oren et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9358916 | Oren | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9394102 | Oren et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9403626 | Oren | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9421899 | Oren | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9440785 | Oren et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9446801 | Oren | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9475661 | Oren | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9511929 | Oren | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9522816 | Taylor | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9527664 | Oren | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9580238 | Friesen et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
RE46334 | Oren et al. | Mar 2017 | E |
9617065 | Allegretti et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9617066 | Oren | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9624030 | Oren et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9624036 | Luharuka et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9643774 | Oren | May 2017 | B2 |
9650216 | Allegretti | May 2017 | B2 |
9656799 | Oren et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9669993 | Oren et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9670752 | Glynn et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9676554 | Glynn et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9682815 | Oren | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9694970 | Oren et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9701463 | Oren et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9718609 | Oren et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9718610 | Oren | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9725233 | Oren et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9725234 | Oren et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9738439 | Oren et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
RE46531 | Oren et al. | Sep 2017 | E |
9758081 | Oren | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9758993 | Allegretti et al. | Sep 2017 | B1 |
9771224 | Oren et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9783338 | Allegretti et al. | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9796319 | Oren | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9796504 | Allegretti et al. | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9809381 | Oren et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9828135 | Allegretti et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9840366 | Oren et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9969564 | Oren et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9988182 | Allegretti et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10059246 | Oren | Aug 2018 | B1 |
10081993 | Walker et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10189599 | Allegretti et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10207753 | O'Marra et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10287091 | Allegretti | May 2019 | B2 |
10308421 | Allegretti | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10486854 | Allegretti et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10518828 | Oren et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10604338 | Allegretti | Mar 2020 | B2 |
20020121464 | Soldwish-Zoole et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030159310 | Hensley et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040008571 | Coody et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040031335 | Fromme et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040206646 | Goh et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040258508 | Jewell | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050219941 | Christenson et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060013061 | Bivens et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060120209 | Galijan | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070014185 | Diosse | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070201305 | Heilman et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080187423 | Mauchle | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080273415 | Thornton | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294484 | Furman et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090078410 | Krenek et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090129903 | Lyons, III | May 2009 | A1 |
20090177313 | Heller et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090292572 | Alden et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090314791 | Hartley et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100025041 | Phillippi | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100196129 | Buckner | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100319921 | Eia et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110211418 | Tassone | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120017812 | Renyer et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120018093 | Zuniga et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120037231 | Janson | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120181093 | Fehr et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120219391 | Teichrob et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130128687 | Adams | May 2013 | A1 |
20130135958 | O'Callaghan | May 2013 | A1 |
20130142601 | McIver et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130206415 | Sheesley | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130284729 | Cook et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140023463 | Oren | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140044508 | Luharuka et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140076569 | Pham et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140083554 | Harris | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140216736 | Leugemors et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140299225 | Oren | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140305769 | Eiden, III et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140377042 | McMahon | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150003955 | Oren et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150016209 | Barton et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150044004 | Pham et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150183578 | Oren et al. | Jul 2015 | A9 |
20150191318 | Martel | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150284194 | Oren et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150353293 | Richard | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150366405 | Manchuliantsau | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150368052 | Sheesley | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150375930 | Oren et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160031658 | Oren et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160039433 | Oren et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160046438 | Oren et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160046454 | Oren et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160068342 | Oren et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160130095 | Oren et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160244279 | Oren et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160264352 | Oren | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160280476 | Stegemoeller | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160332809 | Harris | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160332811 | Harris | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170021318 | McIver et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170123437 | Boyd et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170129696 | Oren | May 2017 | A1 |
20170144834 | Oren et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170203915 | Oren | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170217353 | Vander Pol et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170217671 | Allegretti | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170225883 | Oren | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170240350 | Oren et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170240361 | Glynn et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170240363 | Oren | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170267151 | Oren | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170283165 | Oren et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170313497 | Schaffner et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170334639 | Hawkins et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170349226 | Oren et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180257814 | Allegretti et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180369762 | Hunter et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190009231 | Warren et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190111401 | Lucas et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20200062448 | Allegretti et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2937826 | Oct 2015 | EP |
2066220 | Jul 1981 | GB |
2204847 | Nov 1988 | GB |
01-122831 | May 1989 | JP |
06-182767 | Jul 1994 | JP |
2008239019 | Oct 2008 | JP |
2008012513 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2013095871 | Jun 2013 | WO |
2013142421 | Sep 2013 | WO |
2014018129 | Jan 2014 | WO |
2014018236 | May 2014 | WO |
2015119799 | Aug 2015 | WO |
2015191150 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2015192061 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2016044012 | Mar 2016 | WO |
2016160067 | Oct 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in related PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/029750 dated Jan. 26, 2016, 13 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in related PCT Application PCT/US2015/029750, dated Nov. 16, 2017, 10 pages. |
Search report issued in related Canadian application No. 2,967,291, dated May 30, 2018 (6 pages). |
Office Action issued in related Canadian Patent Application No. 2,996,055 dated Oct. 2, 2020, 5 pages. |
U.S. Pat. No. 0,802,254A, dated Oct. 17, 1905, “Can-Cooking Apparatus,” John Baker et al. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170327326 A1 | Nov 2017 | US |