1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to the field of consumer packaging. More specifically, this invention relates to plastic containers of the type that are used to package consumer beverages, and the strength characteristics of such plastic containers.
2. Description of the Related Technology
Plastic containers are in wide use commercially throughout the world for packaging liquids of all types, including consumer beverages. The most common type of plastic container that is used for packaging, for example, soft drinks, is fabricated from polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and is molded into a desired shape using a blowmolding process that is well known in the industry.
In the design of such containers, a number of factors are ordinarily considered. The container must be chemically resistant and should be shaped to avoid concentration of stress that result in unwanted failure. In addition, the container must be strong enough to endure the packaging process and subsequent handling during the gross packaging, shipping and retail display stages.
One type of strength that plastic containers are regularly evaluated for it is that of top load strength. Top load strength involves resistance to failure, typically sidewall buckling, when a vertical force is exerted onto the top of the container. Such vertical force is exerted onto the container during the filling process and when the closure is installed onto the container. In addition, a great deal of vertical force may be exerted onto filled containers when cases of the containers are stacked during shipping. Another type of strength that is regularly evaluated in the design of plastic containers is hoop strength. Hoop strength is the resistance provided by the container against the tendency of the container sidewall to bow outwardly or deflect inwardly when the contents of the container are under pressurization or when external forces are applied to the outside of the container, which of course is a common scenario in the packaging and transportation of carbonated soft drinks.
It is generally known in the industry that circumferential reinforcement such as ribbing tends to increase hoop strength, and that vertical reinforcement has a favorable effect on top load strength. However, it should be understood that there is a to economic disincentive to provide any more reinforcement to a plastic container design than is absolutely necessary, because increased reinforcement tends to make the container heavier and thus more expensive to manufacture. A need exists, then, for a plastic container design that optimizes hoop strength and top load strength while minimizing the amount of plastic material that is necessary to fabricate the container.
Accordingly, it is an object of the invention to provide a plastic container design that optimizes hoop strength and top load strength while minimizing the amount of plastic material that is necessary to fabricate the container.
In order to achieve the above and other objects of the invention, a plastic container that is constructed according to a first aspect of the invention includes a finish portion; and a generally cylindrical main body portion, said main body portion comprising a sidewall having a first plurality of generally vertical ribs defined therein, the sidewall further having a second plurality of generally horizontal wave shaped ribs defined therein, at least one of the generally horizontal wave shaped ribs intersecting with at least one of the generally vertical ribs, whereby enhanced strength characteristics are imparted to the container.
These and various other advantages and features of novelty that characterize the invention are pointed out with particularity in the claims annexed hereto and forming a part hereof. However, for a better understanding of the invention, its advantages, and the objects obtained by its use, reference should be made to the drawings which form a further part hereof, and to the accompanying descriptive matter, in which there is illustrated and described a preferred embodiment of the invention.
Referring now to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate corresponding structure throughout the views, and referring in particular to
As may further be seen in
In the preferred embodiment, it will be seen that each of the generally horizontal wave shaped ribs 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36 intersects with each of the 16 vertical ribs. Preferably, a plurality, and more preferably at least three of the vertical ribs intersect each wave shaped rib within each wavelength. According to one important aspect of the invention, the location or placement of the vertical ribs is harmonized with respect to the waveform of at least one of the horizontal ribs. In the preferred embodiment, the vertical ribs 18, 20,22, 24 will intersect each of the generally horizontal wave shaped ribs 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36 in a repeating pattern such that each of the vertical ribs 18 intersects each wave shaped rib at the lowermost point of the wave trough, and so that each of the vertical ribs 20 intersects each wave shaped rib at a median location between the wave trough and an adjacent wave peak. Also, each vertical rib 22 will intersect each wave shaped rib at the wave peak and each vertical rib 24 will intersect each wave shaped rib at a median location between the wave peak and the next wave trough. Accordingly, at least one of the generally vertical ribs 18, 20, 22, 24 intersects at least one of the generally horizontal wave shaped ribs 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36 at a location of maximum amplitude of the wave shaped rib, and another one of the generally vertical ribs intersects the horizontal wave shaped rib at a location of minimum amplitude. This is believed to maximize both the hoop strength and top load strength that is achievable by the structure.
As may be visualized in
It is to be understood, however, that even though numerous characteristics and advantages of the present invention have been set forth in the foregoing description, together with details of the structure and function of the invention, the disclosure is illustrative only, and changes may be made in detail, especially in matters of shape, size and arrangement of parts within the principles of the invention to the full extent indicated by the broad general meaning of the terms in which the appended claims are expressed.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US03/35337 | 11/5/2003 | WO | 00 | 8/18/2006 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2004/080828 | 9/23/2004 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3335902 | Javorik | Aug 1967 | A |
3357593 | Sears, Jr. et al. | Dec 1967 | A |
5054632 | Alberghini et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5067622 | Garver et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5101990 | Krishnakumar et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5199588 | Hayashi | Apr 1993 | A |
5201438 | Norwood | Apr 1993 | A |
5690244 | Darr | Nov 1997 | A |
5988417 | Cheng et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
D423940 | Chimetto | May 2000 | S |
6062409 | Eberle | May 2000 | A |
6179142 | Hansen | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6230912 | Rashid | May 2001 | B1 |
D494473 | Yourist | Aug 2004 | S |
6779673 | Melrose et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
D506139 | Zboch et al. | Jun 2005 | S |
D522874 | Livingston et al. | Jun 2006 | S |
D523347 | Livingston | Jun 2006 | S |
D527267 | Zboch et al. | Aug 2006 | S |
20030010743 | Boukobza | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030080135 | Bezek | May 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2330125 | Apr 1999 | GB |
09240647 | Sep 1997 | JP |
10203519 | Apr 1998 | JP |
11130035 | May 1999 | JP |
WO 9601212 | Jan 1996 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070012649 A1 | Jan 2007 | US |