1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a device for gripping containers from above.
2. Description of the Related Art
Container gripping devices are generally known and, because the frame is generally adjustable, are usually referred to as spreaders.
Spreaders are applied for gripping containers during hoisting thereof, for instance during loading or unloading of container ships. Standard containers are provided for handling and anchoring thereof with gripping points on the corners, so-called corner castings. These corner castings form reinforced corner points in which an elongate opening is formed. The gripping means of the frame, usually in the form of a so-called twist-lock, can grip in these openings.
A twist-lock consists here of a pin or shank with a hammer head on an outer end, which pin is received at its other outer end in a bush or sleeve, which is connected in turn to a rotating operating mechanism. The twist-lock can be rotated through 90 degrees by the operating mechanism between a position in which the hammer head can be placed in the elongate opening and a position in which the hammer head is fixed in this opening.
Since during loading and unloading of containers the transport means on which or in which the containers are supplied and/or removed necessarily stands or lies still, the time involved herein is in principle costly for the transporter. It is therefore of great importance that this time is minimized by processing the containers as quickly as possible. This entails gripping devices being carried to the containers at increasingly higher speed and hoisting speeds increasing more and more.
Owing to these higher speeds the loads which occur when the frame of the gripping device lands on the container are also becoming increasingly larger. These greater loads result in increased wear and thus a reduction in the life span of the different components of the device, while in addition the high loads result in considerable noise production, both during landing of the frame on the container and at the beginning of the hoisting movement, when the device is not yet fully loaded. This noise results in nuisance, particularly in built-up areas.
It has already been proposed to reduce the loads on the gripping device, and thereby the noise nuisance, by applying spring-mounting and/or damping. There are therefore spreaders on the market wherein each twist-lock with its operating mechanism is accommodated in a housing, which is movable in resilient and/or damped manner in the direction of load relative to the frame, thus parallel to the shank of the twist-lock. In one of the known spreaders rubber blocks arranged between the housing and the frame are used as spring and/or damping elements, while in another known design use is made of hydraulic cylinders.
These known spreaders have the drawback that space is required for guiding of the housing in the frame, whereby the outer dimensions of the frame become larger at the position of the corners, and the frame will therefore protrude outside the container(s). All lateral loads will hereby be absorbed by the frame, so that the chance of damage to the gripping device increases.
The spring and/or damping elements also take up space above the twist-locks, whereby the construction height of the frame increases. This has consequences for the driving of the pivotable centring members or “flippers” usually arranged on the corners of the frame. Because this drive is usually arranged on top of the frame, an increase in the frame height results in a greater distance of the flippers from the drive, and therefore a greater moment arm, so that the drive has to take a heavier form.
The stability of the construction is furthermore reduced by the floating suspension of the twist-locks, while the precision with which the spreader can be placed on a container likewise decreases.
Finally, owing to the increase in the dimensions of the frame in all directions, the chance of damage thereto is increased disproportionately, since a spreader in loaded state, particularly when it is hoisting a plurality of containers simultaneously, will never hang perfectly horizontally. A slightly inclining position, particularly at the start of a hoisting movement, can result in the spreader becoming jammed, for instance in a cell of a container ship, whereby very high loads will occur which will soon result in damage.
The invention therefore has for its object to provide a container gripping device of the above described type, wherein these drawbacks do not occur. According to the invention this is achieved in such a device by at least one contact element connected to the frame, which element is biased to a position located at least partly under the frame and which is adapted to brake the movement of the frame in the vicinity of a container when the frame is placed thereon. By making use of one or more contact elements connected to the frame for the purpose of braking the frame, and not using the twist-locks for this purpose, the twist-locks can be built compactly into the frame in conventional manner. Furthermore, a stable and readily placeable spreader is thus obtained.
In order to distribute the loads over the whole frame, the gripping device preferably has a number of contact elements, each arranged in the vicinity of a corner of the frame.
A compact device is obtained when the or each contact element is arranged in or on the frame and protrudes through an opening formed in the frame. The space available in the frame can thus be utilized optimally.
The or each contact element is preferably elastically deformable. The desired movement can thus be achieved with a minimum of components, whereby the chance of malfunction is relatively small.
It is on the other hand also possible for the or each contact element to be pivotally connected to the frame. This produces a readily controllable and guidable movement of the contact elements.
The or each contact element is advantageously biased by spring means arranged between the frame and the or each contact element. In this manner the loads can be uniformly transferred to the surrounding construction during braking of the frame.
In order to absorb a part of the energy during braking of the frame, the device preferably has damping means arranged between the frame and the or each contact element. When these damping means are at least partly accommodated in an elevation formed on the frame, they can take a relatively large form, and thus produce a considerable damping without protruding and being exposed to damage.
A gripping device 1 (
On the end of each outer telescopic arm 8 is arranged a relatively high cross beam 9 which in each case has on its corners 10 gripping means in the form of a twist-lock 11. In addition, centring members or flippers 13 pivotable on shafts 12 are also placed on the corners.
Each twist-lock 11 is formed by a hammer-head bolt 14, the shank 18 of which is received in a guide sleeve 15. At the top the shank 18 of hammer-head bolt 14 is fastened in an operating sleeve or crank 16, which is connected in turn to an operating mechanism 22. Hammer-head bolt 14 can be rotated around an axis 17 by this operating mechanism 22, which does not form part of the present invention and will not be further described here.
Situated on the free outer end of shank 18 is a hammer head 19 which is formed and dimensioned such that it can be placed in an elongate opening 20 in a corner part or corner casting 21 of container 2, and can be hooked fixedly in this opening 20 by being rotated through 90° on axis 17.
Gripping device 1 is further provided in conventional manner with corner rollers 23 for guiding frame 3 in small spaces, as well as a sensor 24 which detects the movement of a feeler 25 and on the basis thereof drives a locking mechanism for twist-lock 11.
In order to limit the loads on device 1 as much as possible during lowering of frame 3 onto container 2, contact elements 26 are arranged in the vicinity of corners 10 of frame 2, which elements are biased into a position in which they protrude partly below the frame. In the shown embodiment each contact element 26 is formed by an L-shaped leg, an end part 27 of which is fixed on the base 28 of cross beam 9, while the free end part 29 protrudes through an opening 30 in this base 28. Each L-shaped contact element 26 is mounted rigidly here, but is given a narrowed form close to its end part 27, whereby this part is resiliently deformable. In the unloaded situation each contact element 26 takes up the position shown in
When frame 3 is now lowered onto a container 2 for hoisting, it is the protruding end parts 30 of contact elements 26 which first come into contact with the upper side of container 2. Contact elements 26 will herein bend upward under the influence of the weight of the lowering frame 3, whereby a part of the kinetic energy of frame 3 is absorbed and it is thus braked. The contact elements are dimensioned herein such that even when the end parts 30 completely disappear into frame 3, the occurring deformations are still in the elastic range, so that contact elements 26 will thus spring back when the load is removed.
In order to enable the absorption of an even greater part of the kinetic energy of frame 3, spring means 31 are also arranged between contact elements 26 and frame 3. These spring means 31 are formed here by compression springs 32 placed around bolts 33 which are in turn mounted in base 28 of cross beam 9, protrude through the L-shaped legs and each carry a lock nut 34 on their free outer end.
Both the spring means 31 and the contact elements 26 will in principle spring back when they are relieved of load, whereby all energy stored therein would be released. This could result in the occurrence of great forces, whereby the frame could be greatly accelerated. In order to prevent this, damping means 35 are also arranged between contact elements 26 and frame 3. These damping means 35, here in the form of hydraulic cylinders 36, the piston rods 37 of which are connected to contact elements 26, are each arranged in the shown embodiment in the high part of cross beam 9, whereby they can have a considerable volume and can therefore bring about a high degree of damping. Uncontrolled springing-back of spring means 31 and contact elements 26 is avoided due to this damping. Furthermore, the movement of the frame when landing on container 2 is hereby braked more smoothly than would be possible on the basis of the deformation of contact elements 26 and spring means 31.
Owing to contact elements 26, supplemented here with spring means 31 and damping means 35, the downward movement of frame 3 is thus braked as it makes contact with container(s) 2, whereby the occurring loads, and thereby also the noise, remain limited. Twist-locks 11 are moreover hereby pulled smoothly into corner castings 21 when hoisting begins, so that the noise is here also limited.
Although the invention is elucidated above on the basis of an embodiment, it will be apparent that it is not limited thereto. The contact elements could thus take a movable instead of a deformable form. Movements other than the shown pivoting movement can also be envisaged, for instance a vertical sliding movement. In addition, other spring and/or damping means can of course be applied, whether of hydraulic, pneumatic or mechanical type. The scope of the invention is therefore defined solely by the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1015287 | May 2000 | NL | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/NL01/00410 | 5/28/2001 | WO | 00 | 7/7/2003 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO01/89979 | 11/29/2001 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3558176 | Fathauer | Jan 1971 | A |
3948341 | Foster | Apr 1976 | A |
4130075 | Larive | Dec 1978 | A |
4139228 | Varadi | Feb 1979 | A |
4219228 | Duckett | Aug 1980 | A |
4255829 | Tarasiuk | Mar 1981 | A |
4358145 | Svensson | Nov 1982 | A |
4549841 | Ishige | Oct 1985 | A |
4630856 | Peeters Weem et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
5052734 | Hasegawa et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5280980 | Coatta | Jan 1994 | A |
5957055 | Bauer et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6431379 | Kroll et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2029681 | Dec 1971 | DE |
0365086 | Oct 1989 | EP |
2518075 | Jun 1983 | FR |
9-40350 | Feb 1997 | JP |
9-40351 | Feb 1997 | JP |
9-86856 | Mar 1997 | JP |
11-292456 | Oct 1999 | JP |
9-315753 | Dec 1999 | JP |
WO 9009336 | Aug 1990 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040100111 A1 | May 2004 | US |