This application is the national stage (Rule 371) of international application PCT/FR2014/050762 filed Mar. 3, 2014.
The invention relates to the field of containers, particularly bottles or jars, manufactured by blow molding or stretch-blow molding from parisons of plastic material such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET).
A container comprises, conventionally, a body that delimits the general volume of the container, extended, at an upper end of the container, by a neck, through which the container is filled and emptied, and, at a lower end, by a bottom that closes the container.
The bottom must be able to bear, without significantly deforming, at least the hydrostatic pressure of the column of liquid that is above it. Many shapes of bottoms exist, depending on the applications concerned. Thus, for carbonated applications (typically sodas), the bottoms generally have a petaloid shape, comprising an alternation of valleys, of hemispherical shape, and projecting feet, whose ends form a base for the container (see, for example, the French patent application FR 2 959 214 or its U.S. equivalent US 2013/043255).
The petaloid-shaped bottom appears as a relatively successful solution exhibiting a good resistance to the strong internal pressures in the container (thanks to the hemispherical shape of the valleys).
However, the petaloid-shaped bottom requires a considerable amount of material (on the order of 15 to 18 g for a 0.5 liter container), as well as a relatively high blow molding pressure, to ensure a proper impression-taking of the feet and valleys. These constraints appear justified, however, by the relatively high price at which the products concerned are distributed.
The petaloid-shaped bottoms, however, may not be suitable for flat-liquid-type applications (typically table water), for which the blow molding pressure and the amount of material used (today on the order of 10 g for a 0.5 liter container) are minimized.
A bottom provided with a simple concave arch is not able to support without significant deformation the hydrostatic pressure alone of the liquid that is above it. Therefore, it has been proposed to provide the bottom with radial ribs, intended to reinforce the bottom to make it possible for it to better withstand the deformations caused by the pressure of the contents.
Now, it is becoming common for certain applications of flat liquids that are susceptible to oxidation (particularly fruit juices, but also certain plain waters) to remove the air above the flat liquid and to replace it with an inert gas (typically nitrogen). In practice, this operation is performed by adding a drop of liquefied inert gas to the surface of the flat liquid, immediately preceding the capping of the container. This operation, referred to as inerting (nitrogenating in the case of nitrogen), causes an excess pressure in the container. Although seemingly slight (on the order of 0.5 to 1 bar), this excess pressure is enough to considerably increase the stresses that are exerted on the bottom.
It has been proposed by the applicant to improve the ribbed bottoms by introducing a variability in the depth of the grooves, see, for example, French patent FR 2 753 435 (Sidel), to make it possible for the bottom to offer enough mechanical strength to bear the excess pressure due to nitrogenating. However, the savings demands of the market, or even certain anti-pollution standards, lead the manufacturers to use ever less material. Other things being equal, the result is a reduction in the mechanical performance of the bottom. This is particularly the case of the bottom described in the aforementioned patent, such that it consequently appears necessary to enhance it to maintain, indeed improve, its performance without, however, adversely affecting its blowability (i.e., its ability to be properly shaped by blow molding).
For this purpose, a container made of plastic material is proposed that is provided with a body and with a bottom extending from a lower end of the body, the bottom comprising:
Provided with a thus structured bottom, the container offers a better mechanical performance than the standard grooved bottoms with an equal amount of material, while offering a good blowability.
Various additional characteristics can be foreseen, alone or in combination:
Other objects and advantages of the invention will come to light from the description of an embodiment, given hereafter with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
In
This container 1 comprises, at an upper end, a neck 2, provided with a rim 3. In the extension of the neck 2, the container 1 comprises, in its upper part, a shoulder 4 that flares out in the direction opposite the neck 2, this shoulder 4 being extended by a lateral wall or body 5, with a generally rotationally cylindrical shape around a main axis X of the container 1.
The container 1 further comprises a bottom 6 that extends opposite the neck 2, from a lower end of the body 5. The bottom 6 of the container comprises a peripheral base 7 in the form of an annular pad that extends approximately axially in the extension of the body 5. The base 7 defines a standing plane 8 perpendicular to the longitudinal axis X of the container 1, which standing plane 8 forms the lower end of the container 1 and makes it possible for it to be set, standing, on a flat surface.
Toward the interior of the container 1, the base 7 comprises a truncated, cone-shaped, annular ledge 9 that extends toward the interior of the container 1 in the extension of the standing plane 8, the truncated cone formed by the ledge 9 opening downward (in relief) and having an angle at the apex of at least 70° (and less than or equal to 90°). This ledge 9 can have a height of between 1 mm and 3 mm, for example about 1.5 mm.
The bottom 6 of the container further comprises a concave arch 10, in the shape of an approximately spherical dome that is concave and facing toward the exterior of the container 1 in the absence of stress, i.e., in the absence of contents in the container 1. The arch 10 extends from the base 7, in the extension of the ledge 9 (which forms a junction between the standing plane 8 and a peripheral edge of the arch 10), to a central area 11 of the bottom 6 forming a piece projecting toward the interior of the container 1, with—at its center—an amorphous button 12 that corresponds to the injection area of the constituent material of the preform that has been used to make the container 1 and can fulfill the function of centering during the forming, by blow molding, of the container 1.
As can be seen in the figures, and in particular in
In other words, the main grooves 13 extend radially over the whole arch 10, straddling the base 7 and partially the body 5. Consequently, it is understood that the standing plane 8 is discontinuous, since it is interrupted at right angles to each main groove 13. The main grooves 13 are, for example, five in number (as in the illustrated example, which corresponds to a container with a capacity of 0.5 liter), but this number could be greater, particularly six in the case of a container with a capacity that is greater than or equal to 1 liter, or even seven in the case of a container with a capacity that is greater than or equal to 2.5 liters.
According to a preferred embodiment, the bottom 6 of the container is further provided with a series of intermediate reinforcing grooves 14, located between the main grooves 13, and which extend locally astride the base 7 that they thus contribute to making rigid. As shown in
The main grooves 13 have the function of increasing the resistance of the arch 10 to collapsing (indeed to inversion) under the effect of the forces caused by the pressure exerted by the contents of the container 1 (typically a flat liquid optionally put under pressure by the injection of a drop of liquefied gas into the volume defined in the neck 2 between the open surface of the liquid and the rim 3, immediately before the capping of the container 1).
As illustrated in
Each main reinforcing groove 13 has a bottom 16 that extends from the central area 11 in a radial direction, flanked by two lateral walls 17. The depth of the groove 13, measured between the edge of the angular sectors 15 that are adjacent to the groove 13, and its bottom 16, is marked P.
In a preferred example of embodiment, the bottom 16 of the groove 13 exhibits in cross-section a rounded profile (which could, however, be flattened), the lateral walls 17 defining in cross-section an open angle, such that the groove 13 has a V-shaped section with a rounded tip.
As is seen clearly in
Each reinforcing rib 18 has the function of forming a reinforcing beam (or stiffener) that acts like a strut and that is intended to increase the resistance of the bottom 6 of the container to deformations due to the pressure exerted by the contents of the container 1. In particular, the reinforcing ribs 18 aim to minimize the risks of inversion of the bottom 6 (and more specifically of the arch 10) under the effect of too great an internal pressure in the container 1.
According to a preferred embodiment, each reinforcing rib 18 makes a continuous junction between the main groove 13 that it borders and the arch 10. More specifically, and as is illustrated in
As is seen in
As in the illustrated example, the reinforcing ribs 18 that border two adjacent main grooves 13, located on both sides of the same angular sector 15 of the arch 10, preferably extend in continuity with one another, implementing their junction in the vicinity of the central area 11 and together forming a continuous V-shaped reinforcing structure.
In this way, each angular sector 15 of the arch 10 is bordered outwardly by the ledge 9, and laterally and inwardly by two adjacent and contiguous reinforcing ribs 18.
Thus, each main groove 13 extends projecting, in relation to each sector of the arch 10, toward the interior of the container 1, while each reinforcing rib 18 extends projecting, in relation to the angular sector 15, toward the exterior of the container 1. The result is a relative non-deformability of the bottom 6 of the container to the deformations due both to an excess pressure in the container 1 (having a tendency to push the bottom 6 back toward the exterior of the container 1) and to a negative pressure in it (having a tendency to draw the bottom 6 toward the interior of the container 1), following, for example, a cooling. Overall, the bottom of the container that is structured in this way offers a better resistance to deformation than an ordinary bottom, having an equal amount of material.
As is seen in the figures, and more clearly in
The step 24 extends continuously, i.e., it is interrupted neither on a level with the main grooves 13 but extends to the bottom 16 of them, nor on a level with the reinforcing ribs 18 but extends straddling them.
The axial step 24 extends annularly around the central area 11. In the embodiment shown, where the container 1 has an approximately rotationally cylindrical shape around its axis X, the step 24 forms a ring having a circular contour.
By the presence of the axial step 24, the central region 22 of the bottom 6 of the container, although having a radius of curvature that is approximately identical to that of the peripheral region 23, is found to be slightly offset in relation to it toward the interior of the container 1.
The step 24 has the function of maintaining the stability of the container 1 by causing a stiffening of the arch 10 in its median region and by limiting the deformation of the arch 10 so as to enlarge the base 7 toward the center of the bottom 6 of the container.
Thus, a container 1 of PET as described previously, with a capacity of 0.5 liter, with a weight of 10 g, has been able to be blow molded without difficulty at an air pressure of about 20 bar, the final container 1 filled with plain water offering good mechanical performance including under a condition of excess pressure due to nitrogenating in the area of the neck 2.
The container 1 provided with this bottom 6 exhibits a good compromise between mechanical performance (i.e., the capacity of the container 1 to withstand deformations and, when they occur, to endure them in a controlled manner) and blowability (i.e., the capacity of the container 1 to be formed by blow molding).
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
13 52976 | Apr 2013 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2014/050762 | 3/31/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/162088 | 10/9/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4249666 | Hubert | Feb 1981 | A |
5381910 | Sugiura et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
20030052076 | Cheng et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030196926 | Tobias | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040094502 | Boukobza | May 2004 | A1 |
20100297375 | Protais | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110309090 | Derroem et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20130043209 | Wurster et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130043255 | Boukobza | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130087568 | Hermel et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 959 214 | Mar 1998 | FR |
2 753 435 | Oct 2011 | FR |
2011157952 | Dec 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report, dated Jul. 7, 2014, from corresponding PCT application. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160288946 A1 | Oct 2016 | US |