Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The present invention relates to stackable containers in general and containers for take out food in particular.
In recent times food on the go has become part of the solution to the hectic pace of life in the modern age. For some fast food restaurants more meals are ordered from the drive-through window than dine in. Grocery stores continue to expand their offerings of ready to eat lunch and dinner entrées. With hundreds of different entrées to choose from in your local grocery store, solutions for packaging takeout items are ever more in demand. Often with so many entrées available frequently sold by weight, the consumer wishes to combine several entrées so as to have a more complete meal or sometimes to purchase smaller amounts of different items to be consumed at different times. The problem arises that each entrée when packaged in a separate take-out container becomes collectively difficult to handle, with the possibility of items being dropped and thus scrambled and made less palatable. What is needed is a system of two or more food containers which can be stacked to form a balanced and easily handled grouping of items which will be eaten or served for the take-out meal.
The container system of the present invention comprises a single larger container consisting of an upwardly opening container and the resealable lid which holds a main or first entrée, and one or two additional smaller containers to handle separate entrées which are so linked as to make them balanced so as to easily transport groupings of containers. The container comprises two or three thermal formed container bases and corresponding lids. The resealable lids rise some distance above the open container increasing the volume of the container and having a flat region rendering of the containers that are geometrically simple like stackable blocks. One larger container for the main entrée has an upper lid surface on which at least two raised structures are formed. The raised structures are each arranged to extend into a depression in the bottom of two smaller containers to position and hold the smaller containers on the upper surface of the larger container lid so that the larger container and the two smaller containers can be moved as a unit without danger that the smaller units will slide off the larger unit cover. Two raised structures are spaced apart and form mirror images, one with the other, and are further arranged to hold a single container centered over the larger container. The two raised structures have the appearance of brackets which engage the ends of the container. The raised structures can be seen as a single raised structure in which a depression is formed to hold one container against movement on the larger container's lid. Redundant structures unnecessary for preventing movement of the single smaller container are then removed leaving the two brackets each of which can hold one of two smaller containers of the same base dimensions by extending into the depression of the two smaller containers.
The container system thus formed comprises one size of large containers and two or more sizes of small containers each of which has the same base area but a different interior volume defined by the height of the smaller containers. Design applications 29/589,756, 29/589,764 and 29/589,771 all having a filing date of Jan. 4, 2017 are incorporated herein by reference.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a container system with relatively few containers such as three or four, which collectively provide the packaging for a wide variety of entrée selections and then allow the selections to be grouped in such a way that they form a balanced unit which can be conveniently and reliably handled.
Further objects, features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Referring more particularly to
Many more complex entrées have more than one side dish or sauce such that two secondary containers 34 and 38 are advantageously employed in the container system 18 as shown in
It is important that the mass of one or both of the secondary containers is arranged such that the containers as a system of two or three containers 18, 19 as shown in
To accomplish the function of holding one container or two containers against sliding motion on the lid 26 of the primary container 20 while centering the masses of the secondary containers 34, 38 with respect to the primary container requires meeting certain geometric constraints.
The first geometric constraint is that the lid 26 of the primary container must be sufficiently large as to support two of the secondary containers 34, 38 on the lid 26. A second constraint is that the depth of the indentation 40 formed by side walls 42, 44, 46 and 48 on the bottom wall 32 of each secondary container 34, 38, must be indented to a greater depth than the height of the raised structures 28 and 30 such that each of the raised structures can fit within the indentation 40 of either of the secondary containers. A third constraint is that the secondary container 34, 38 has two longer exterior walls 58 and two shorter exterior walls 60, wherein the shorter walls have a length that is less than the longer walls 42, 48 of the indentation 40. The result of this third constraint is that bracket-shaped indentations 62 can be formed in the raised structure 28, 30 to hold a single secondary container 34, 38 without destroying the functionality of the raised structures to engage and hold against movement of each of the two secondary containers. As shown in
It should be understood that the raised structures 28, 30 could have various shapes and each be made of more than one raised portion, so long as such raised portions have structures which function the same or similarly to the above described structures. For example, any part of the raised structures which is not arranged to bear against the exterior of one of the smaller containers, or a wall 42, 44, 46 and 48 of the indentation 40 is unnecessary and may be eliminated. Basically at least two points spaced apart by at least a 0.25 inch or 0.5 inch, more preferably at least 1 inch or a linear structure of similar dimensions must be arranged to bear against the exterior walls of a single container or the interior walls of the indentations of two containers so as to substantially prevent the smaller containers sliding movement on the lid of the larger container.
It is understood that the invention is not limited to the particular construction and arrangement of parts herein illustrated and described, but embraces all such modified forms thereof as come within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2695115 | Roop | Apr 1953 | A |
3117692 | Carpenter et al. | Jan 1964 | A |
4286713 | Marchais | Sep 1981 | A |
4832200 | Deaton et al. | May 1989 | A |
5419451 | Bitel, Jr. | May 1995 | A |
D360336 | Bitel, Jr. | Jul 1995 | S |
6371364 | Maillot et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
7017775 | Lettle et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7032773 | Dees et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7798353 | Blythe et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
D677150 | Barbier | Mar 2013 | S |
8523006 | Barbier | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8851287 | Becklin | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9108766 | Gosen | Aug 2015 | B2 |
20080116098 | Marooflan et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20120006837 | Becklin | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120168449 | Barbier | Jul 2012 | A1 |