The present technology pertains in general to interconnecting containers for micro-service based applications and more specifically to enabling traffic flow and data communication between network containers hosted on different physical hosts without performing a handshake process for establishing a communication channel therebetween.
With the introduction of microservices architecture into cloud computing, it is now common to see different services of an application distributed into different containers. For example, in a service chaining environment, it is common to see different service functions instantiated as different containers over one or more physical hosts/servers.
Traffic between such containers is usually carried with Secure Socket Layer (SSL)/Transport Layer Security (TSL) encoded traffic on top of Hyper Text Transfer Protocol (HTTP)1/2 layers. This transport requires a handshake process to be completed between containers, which consume a significant number of CPU cycles. Considering highly meshed applications and services, a number of requested and active Transport Control Protocol (TCP) connections between containers grows with a square of the number of containers (e.g., by (N(N−1)/2, with N being the number of containers).
Furthermore, in such highly meshed applications and with multiple micro-services implementing such applications, the number of active flows increases. This increase is problematic for some Network Fabric elements that cannot scale with the increase of number of flows such as Natural Address Translation (NAT), Load Balancing, Reflexive Access Lists (ACLs) elements. For example, there can be increased latency and CPU cycles used to setup connections between containers and there can be a large number of flows and states used for container networking in Network fabrics.
In order to describe the manner in which the above-recited and other advantages and features of the disclosure can be obtained, a more particular description of the principles briefly described above will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings. Understanding that these drawings depict only exemplary embodiments of the disclosure and are not therefore to be considered to be limiting of its scope, the principles herein are described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:
Various example embodiments of the disclosure are discussed in detail below. While specific implementations are discussed, it should be understood that this is done for illustration purposes only. A person skilled in the relevant art will recognize that other components and configurations may be used without parting from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. Thus, the following description and drawings are illustrative and are not to be construed as limiting. Numerous specific details are described to provide a thorough understanding of the disclosure. However, in certain instances, well-known or conventional details are not described in order to avoid obscuring the description. References to one or an embodiment in the present disclosure can be references to the same embodiment or any embodiment; and, such references mean at least one of the embodiments.
Reference to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the disclosure. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment, nor are separate or alternative embodiments mutually exclusive of other embodiments. Moreover, various features are described which may be exhibited by some embodiments and not by others.
The terms used in this specification generally have their ordinary meanings in the art, within the context of the disclosure, and in the specific context where each term is used. Alternative language and synonyms may be used for any one or more of the terms discussed herein, and no special significance should be placed upon whether or not a term is elaborated or discussed herein. In some cases, synonyms for certain terms are provided. A recital of one or more synonyms does not exclude the use of other synonyms. The use of examples anywhere in this specification including examples of any terms discussed herein is illustrative only, and is not intended to further limit the scope and meaning of the disclosure or of any example term. Likewise, the disclosure is not limited to various embodiments given in this specification.
Without intent to limit the scope of the disclosure, examples of instruments, apparatus, methods and their related results according to the embodiments of the present disclosure are given below. Note that titles or subtitles may be used in the examples for convenience of a reader, which in no way should limit the scope of the disclosure. Unless otherwise defined, technical and scientific terms used herein have the meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure pertains. In the case of conflict, the present document, including definitions will control.
Additional features and advantages of the disclosure will be set forth in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or can be learned by practice of the herein disclosed principles. The features and advantages of the disclosure can be realized and obtained by means of the instruments and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims. These and other features of the disclosure will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, or can be learned by the practice of the principles set forth herein.
As referenced herein, a Function Router can include a service that provides for registration and management of execution endpoints, FaaS services, functions, clients, locations, and routing rules on an account. The Function Router can receive requests for function execution from clients and dynamically route them to the ‘best’ endpoint to execute that function based on defined rules.
An Execution Endpoint (EE) can include a compute-capable system that can run functions. Non-limiting examples can include computers, laptops, IoT devices, servers, switches (e.g., virtual switches and routers (vswitches/vrouters), mobile phones, kiosks, workstations, etc. EEs can be registered in the Function Router for use in executing functions. Execution endpoints can run various FaaS runtime environments and services.
A client can include a device and/or application seeking to execute a function on an Execution Endpoint. Non-limiting examples of a client can include a robot arm, mobile phone, hand scanner, application, printer, kiosk, etc.
A function can include a piece of code. The piece of code can represent, for example, an ephemeral, self-contained set of business logic. Serverless functions can be compared to stored procedures in that they do a specific thing, and are called and executed when needed, only to go back to being dormant (but ready) when execution completes.
A location can include a physical location (e.g., a building, a floor, etc.) and/or a logical location. A location can be associated with specific latitude and longitude coordinates. For example, a location can refer to specific latitude and longitude coordinates corresponding to the manufacturing floor where a robot resides or a conference room where an FaaS device is plugged in, or a region associated with an environment.
Function routing rules can include policies and controls around who, what, when, where, why, and/or how for function execution. The rules can include IT-defined guardrails that affect the entire system, and other rules specified by IT or a development team for a specific function. Example rules can include: Function A can run on any endpoint but Function B must only run on a private endpoint; or Function A can be called by any client in a specific location, but function B can only be called by specific clients in any location.
Overview
Disclosed are systems, methods, and computer-readable media for enabling traffic flow and data communication between network containers hosted on different physical hosts without performing a handshake process for establishing a communication channel therebetween.
In one aspect of the present disclosure, a method includes receiving, at a source switch, a request from a first network container on a source server to establish a data session with a second network container on a destination server; determining, by the source switch, a destination switch of the destination server based on the request; identifying, by the source switch, a pre-established communication tunnel between the source server and the destination server; generating, by the source switch, a data stream to be embedded in the pre-established communication tunnel, wherein a communication protocol associated with the request is different from a communication protocol used by the data stream for communicating data between the first and second network containers; receiving a data packet, at the source switch, to be sent to the destination container; mapping, by the source switch, the data packet to the data stream; and sending, by the source switch, the data packet to the destination server via the data stream over the communication tunnel.
In one aspect of the present disclosure, a device includes one or more network containers implemented thereon and a network switch configured that is configured to receive a request from a first network container of the one or more network containers on the server to establish a data session with a second network container on a destination server; determine a destination switch of the destination network based on the request; identify a communication tunnel between the server and the destination server; generate a data stream to be embedded in the communication tunnel for exchange of data packets between the first network container and the second network container, wherein a communication protocol associated with the request received from the first network container is different from a communication protocol used by the data stream for facilitating the exchange of data packets between the first and second network containers; receive a data packet from the first network container to be sent to the destination container; map the data packet to the data stream; and send the data packet to the destination server via the data stream over the communication tunnel.
In one aspect of the present disclosure, one or more non-transitory computer-readable medium have computer-readable instructions stored thereon, which when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to function as a virtual switch of a server to receive a request from a first network container on the server to establish a transfer control protocol (TCP) session with a second network container on a destination server; determine a destination switch of the destination network based on the request; identify a communication tunnel between the server and the destination server; generate a data stream to be embedded in the communication tunnel for exchange of data packets between the first network container and the second network container, wherein a communication used by the data stream for facilitating the exchange of data packets between the first and second network containers is different from a TCP protocol used for the TCP session; receive a TCP data packet from the first network container to be sent to the destination container; map the TCP data packet to the data stream; and transmit the TCP data packet to the destination server via the data stream over the communication tunnel.
The disclosed technology addresses the need in the art for reducing latency and CPU cycles used to setup connections between network containers and the large number of flows and states used for container networking in Network fabrics.
The disclosure begins with a description of example network environments and architectures which can be implemented for serverless computing and service function chaining, as illustrated in
Cloud 102 can provide various cloud computing services via cloud elements 104-114, such as software as a service (SaaS) (e.g., collaboration services, email services, enterprise resource planning services, content services, communication services, etc.), infrastructure as a service (IaaS) (e.g., security services, networking services, systems management services, etc.), platform as a service (PaaS) (e.g., web services, streaming services, application development services, etc.), function as a service (FaaS), and other types of services such as desktop as a service (DaaS), information technology management as a service (ITaaS), managed software as a service (MSaaS), mobile backend as a service (MBaaS), etc.
Client endpoints 116 can connect with cloud 102 to obtain one or more specific services from cloud 102. Client endpoints 116 can communicate with elements 104-114 via one or more public networks (e.g., Internet), private networks, and/or hybrid networks (e.g., virtual private network). Client endpoints 116 can include any device with networking capabilities, such as a laptop computer, a tablet computer, a server, a desktop computer, a smartphone, a network device (e.g., an access point, a router, a switch, etc.), a smart television, a smart car, a sensor, a GPS device, a game system, a smart wearable object (e.g., smartwatch, etc.), a consumer object (e.g., Internet refrigerator, smart lighting system, etc.), a city or transportation system (e.g., traffic control, toll collection system, etc.), an internet of things (IoT) device, a camera, a network printer, a transportation system (e.g., airplane, train, motorcycle, boat, etc.), or any smart or connected object (e.g., smart home, smart building, smart retail, smart glasses, etc.), and so forth.
Fog layer 156 or “the fog” provides the computation, storage and networking capabilities of traditional cloud networks, but closer to the endpoints. Fog 156 can thus extend cloud 102 to be closer to client endpoints 116. Fog nodes 162 can be the physical implementation of fog networks. Moreover, fog nodes 162 can provide local or regional services and/or connectivity to the client endpoints 116. As a result, traffic and/or data can be offloaded from cloud 102 to fog layer 156 (e.g., via fog nodes 162). Fog layer 156 can thus provide faster services and/or connectivity to client endpoints 116, with lower latency, as well as other advantages such as security benefits from keeping the data inside the local or regional network(s).
Fog nodes 162 can include any networked computing devices, such as servers, switches (e.g., vswitches/vrouters), routers, controllers, cameras, access points, kiosks, gateways, etc. Moreover, fog nodes 162 can be deployed anywhere with a network connection, such as a factory floor, a power pole, alongside a railway track, in a vehicle, on an oil rig, in an airport, on an aircraft, in a shopping center, in a hospital, in a park, in a parking garage, in a library, etc.
In some configurations, one or more fog nodes 162 can be deployed within fog instances 158, 160. Fog instances 158, 160 can be local or regional clouds or networks. For example, fog instances 158, 160 can be a regional cloud or data center, a local area network, a network of fog nodes 162, etc. In some configurations, one or more fog nodes 162 can be deployed within a network, or as standalone or individual nodes, for example. Moreover, one or more of fog nodes 162 can be interconnected with each other via links 164 in various topologies, including star, ring, mesh or hierarchical arrangements, for example.
In some cases, one or more fog nodes 162 can be mobile fog nodes. The mobile fog nodes can move to different geographic locations, logical locations or networks, and/or fog instances while maintaining connectivity with cloud layer 154 and/or endpoints 116. For example, a particular fog node can be placed in a vehicle, such as an aircraft or train, which can travel from one geographic location and/or logical location to a different geographic location and/or logical location. In this example, the particular fog node may connect to a particular physical and/or logical connection point with cloud 154 while located at the starting location and switch to a different physical and/or logical connection point with cloud 154 while located at the destination location. The particular fog node can thus move within particular clouds and/or fog instances and, therefore, serve endpoints from different locations at different times.
Spine switches 202 can connect to leaf switches 204 in fabric 212. Leaf switches 204 can include access ports (or non-fabric ports) and fabric ports. Fabric ports can provide uplinks to spine switches 202, while access ports can provide connectivity for devices, hosts, endpoints, VMs, or external networks to fabric 212.
Leaf switches 204 can reside at the boundary between fabric 212 and the tenant or customer space. Leaf switches 204 can route and/or bridge the tenant packets and apply network policies. In some cases, a leaf switch can perform one or more additional functions, such as implementing a mapping cache, sending packets to the proxy function when there is a miss in the cache, encapsulate packets, enforce ingress or egress policies, etc.
Moreover, leaf switches 204 can contain virtual switching and/or tunneling functionalities, such as a virtual tunnel endpoint (VTEP) function. Thus, leaf switches 204 can connect fabric 212 to an overlay (e.g., VXLAN network).
Network connectivity in fabric 212 can flow through leaf switches 204. Leaf switches 204 can provide servers, resources, endpoints, external networks, containers, or VMs access to fabric 212, and can connect leaf switches 204 to each other. Leaf switches 204 can connect applications and/or endpoint groups (“EPGs”) to other resources inside or outside of fabric 212 as well as any external networks.
Endpoints 210A-E (collectively “210”) can connect to fabric 212 via leaf switches 204. For example, endpoints 210A and 210B can connect directly to leaf switch 204A, which can connect endpoints 210A and 210B to fabric 212 and/or any other of leaf switches 204. Similarly, endpoint 210E can connect directly to leaf switch 204C, which can connect endpoint 210E to fabric 212 and/or any other of leaf switches 204. On the other hand, endpoints 210C and 210D can connect to leaf switch 204A and 204B via network 206. Moreover, wide area network (WAN) 208 can connect to leaf switches 204N.
Endpoints 210 can include any communication device or resource, such as a computer, a server, a cluster, a switch, a container, a VM, a virtual application, etc. In some cases, endpoints 210 can include a server or switch configured with a virtual tunnel endpoint functionality which connects an overlay network with fabric 212. For example, in some cases, endpoints 210 can represent hosts (e.g., servers) with virtual tunnel endpoint capabilities, and running virtual environments (e.g., hypervisor, virtual machine(s), containers, etc.). An overlay network associated with the endpoints 210 can host physical devices, such as servers; applications; EPGs; virtual segments; virtual workloads; etc. Likewise, endpoints 210 can also host virtual workloads and applications, which can connect with fabric 212 or any other device or network, including an external network.
Environment 300 includes two physical hosts 302 and 304 (which can be the same as two of servers 104 shown in and described with reference to
Physical host 302 can have one or more containers (network containers) instantiated thereon such as containers 310, 312, 314 and/or 316. A container may also be referred to as a Point of Delivery (pod). For example, each container 310, 312, 314 can provide one service function (SF) such as one of SF1, SF2 or SF3 on physical host 302. Furthermore, physical host 302 can have a service function forwarder (SFF) 316, provided by a separate container running on physical host 302 or alternatively provided by one of containers 310, 312, 314 providing SF1, SF2 and/or SF3 that can direct data traffic and tasks to different containers depending on the specific function to be performed. Each of containers 310, 213, 314,316 can interface with Contiv HostAgent 306 via a virtual port thereof (i.e., one of ETH0-ETH4) and corresponding virtual ports of Contiv HostAgent 306 (i.e., one of Vport1-Vport4). Similarly, physical host 304 can have a SF4 running on container 318. Container 318 can also act as a SFF in a similar manner as SFF running on container 316. Container 318 can interface with Contiv HostAgent 308 via a virtual port thereof (i.e., ETH5) and corresponding virtual port of Contiv HostAgent 308 (i.e., Vport5).
Physical host 302 may have a physical port 320 through which data from client end points such as client endpoints 116 of
Furthermore, physical host 302 can have a switch 324 which may be a physical or virtual switch (vswitch) for establishing connection with other network components such as physical host 304 and container 318 running thereon. Similarly, physical host 304 can have a switch 326 which may be a physical or a virtual switch (vswitch) for establishing connection with other network components such as physical host 302 and containers 310, 312, 314, 316 running thereon.
In one example, SF1-SF4 provide a firewall service to one or more customers such as client endpoints 116 of
Accordingly, one of more of containers 310, 312, 314 on physical host 302 may attempt to establish a connection with container 318 on physical host 304. As briefly mentioned above, data traffic between such containers is usually carried via Secure Socket Layer (SSL)/Transport Layer Security (TSL) encoded traffic on top of Hyper Text Transfer Protocol (HTTP)1/2 layers. This transport requires a handshake process to be completed between containers, which consumes a significant number of CPU cycles. Considering highly meshed applications and services, a number of requested and active Transport Control Protocol (TCP) connections between containers grows with a square of the number of containers (e.g., by (N(N−1)/2, with N being the number of containers). Furthermore, in such highly meshed applications and multiple containers implementing such applications, the number of active flows increases. This increase is problematic for some Network Fabric elements that cannot scale with the increase of number of flows such as Natural Address Translation (NAT), Load Balancing, Reflexive Access Lists (ACLs) elements.
Hereinafter a process will be described for establishing a data communication session between network containers without performing the handshake process. This will be further described below with reference to
For the functionalities, which will be described with reference to
While
With the above assumptions, the disclosure now turns to
At S400, switch 324 receives a connection request from a first container (e.g., one of containers 310, 312, 314, 316 hosted on physical host 302) to establish a data session with a second container (e.g., container 318 hosted on physical host 304). This connection and the requested data session can also be referred to as a container-to-container connection request and a container-to-container data session. The requested data session may be a TCP session to the second container for exchanging data.
In one example, as part of the connection request, switch 324 receives a TCP synchronization (TCP SYN) packet from the first container. TCP SYN packet can include various information including, but not limited to, an IP address of container 318 (second container), which can be a virtual or actual IP address assigned to container 318. This may be referred to as the destination IP address.
In one example, if the destination IP address is a virtual IP address, switch 324 may assign an actual (physical) IP address of the destination container 318 thereto using any known or to be developed selection algorithm (e.g., cluster IP mode implemented in Kubernetes or Contiv-VPP).
In one example, and upon receiving the connection request, switch 324 can establish a TCP session between first network container, from which the connection request is received at S400 and switch 324.
At S402, switch 324 identifies a switch (a destination switch) of the destination server based on the destination IP address. Included in the TCP SYN packet. This can be switch 326 of physical host 304 in
In one example, each of the source switch (e.g., switch 324) and the destination switch (e.g., switch 326) can be a virtual switch/virtual router or a physical switch/physical router.
At S404 and after identifying the destination server and destination switch at S402, switch 324 identifies a pre-established/existing communication tunnel between the source and destination servers (e.g., the HTTP2 tunnel 328 of
At S406, switch 324 generates a data stream to be embedded in the communication tunnel for communicating data packets (e.g., TCP data packets) received from the source container to be sent to the destination. The data stream may be an HTTP2 stream in the HTTP2 tunnel. In one example, switch 324 generates the HTTP2 stream by creating a packet using a “:connect” method in a header field of the packet and including the destination IP address and ports (e.g., virtual ports connection Contiv HostAgent 306 to the source container (e.g., one of containers 310, 312, 314, 316), which can be extracted from the TCP SYN packet.
In another example and when a QUIC stream in a QUIC tunnel is used instead of HTTP2, appropriate QUIC headers and methods may be utilized to generate the data stream.
Accordingly, the communication protocol used by the data stream for sending and receiving data between physical hosts 302 and 304 is different from the communication protocol originally requested by the source container at S400 (e.g., HTTP2 v. TCP).
In one example, switch 324 (the source switch) has a flow table created for mapping 5-tuple of container to container TCP connection requested at S400 to an identifier of the HTTP2 stream.
Having established the HTTP2 stream, at S408, switch 324 receives data packets from the source container (e.g., one of containers 310, 312, 314, 316).
In one example, at S408, the data packet received by switch 324 can be an outgoing TCP data packet originating from the source container and destined for the destination container, as described above. In the alternative, the data packet received by switch 324 at S408 can be an incoming HTTP2 Data (or alternatively, QUIC data), which was originally sent by another container (e.g., container 318) hosted on a different server (e.g., physical host 304) as a TCP data packet but converted and transmitted by the switch (e.g., switch 326) of the different server into HTTP2 data before transmission thereof to switch 324 and ultimately to the target container (e.g., one of containers 310, 312, 314, 316 hosted on physical host 302).
Therefore, at S410, switch 324 determines if a received data packet is an outgoing packet or an incoming packet. If at S410, switch 324 determines that the packet is an outgoing TCP data packet, then at S412, switch 324 extracts the payload of the TCP data packet received at S408 and embeds the same into data packets portion of the HTTP2 stream.
In one example and at any given point, switch 324 may have multiple HTTP2 sessions created, all of which can be multiplexed onto the HTTP2 tunnel destined for the destination server and containers hosted thereon. Therefore, using the flow table, switch 324 can manage the incoming/outgoing data packets and map them to the correct HTTP2 streams.
Thereafter, at S414, switch 324 sends the HTTP2 stream over the HTTP2 tunnel to the destination switch (e.g., switch 326). By using the HTTP2 session over an existing HTTP2 tunnel, the need for establishing a TCP connection between the source and destination containers and the underlying handshake process is eliminated.
At S416, switch 324 determines if the data session (e.g., the TCP session) has been terminated. Switch 324 may determine the termination of the TCP session by receiving a notification of termination from the source container.
If at S416, switch 324 determines that the TCP session is still active/alive (NO at S416), the process reverts back to S408 and switch 324 continues to receive TCP packets. However, if at S416, switch 324 determines that the TCP session is terminated, then at S418, switch 324 closes the data stream (HTTP2 stream) and updates the flow table accordingly (e.g., removes the corresponding TCP connection-HTTP2 stream mapping entry from the flow table).
Referring back to S410, if switch 324 determines that the received packet is an incoming HTTP2 data packet, then at S420, switch 324 extracts the data from the received HTTP2 data packet and embeds the same into an existing TCP data packet to be sent to the target container (e.g., one of containers 310, 312, 314, 316) for which a TCP session with switch 324 is active. Thereafter, the process reverts back to S416 and S416 and S418 are repeated.
The process of
Second, connections between source and destination containers are no longer visible at the physical infrastructure since they are tunneled through HTTP2 streams established on-demand. Furthermore, TCP connections between containers and hence the network resource consuming handshake process thereof are also eliminated, which reduces the number of flows in the network Fabric generated as a result of the large number of containers that implement highly meshed applications
The disclosure now turns to
To enable user interaction with the computing device 500, an input device 522 can represent any number of input mechanisms, such as a microphone for speech, a touch-sensitive screen for gesture or graphical input, keyboard, mouse, motion input, speech and so forth. An output device 524 can also be one or more of a number of output mechanisms known to those of skill in the art. In some instances, multimodal systems can enable a user to provide multiple types of input to communicate with the computing device 500. The communications interface 526 can generally govern and manage the user input and system output. There is no restriction on operating on any particular hardware arrangement and therefore the basic features here may easily be substituted for improved hardware or firmware arrangements as they are developed.
Storage device 508 is a non-volatile memory and can be a hard disk or other types of computer readable media which can store data that are accessible by a computer, such as magnetic cassettes, flash memory cards, solid state memory devices, digital versatile disks, cartridges, random access memories (RAMs) 516, read only memory (ROM) 518, and hybrids thereof.
The system 500 can include an integrated circuit 528, such as an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) configured to perform various operations. The integrated circuit 528 can be coupled with the connection 506 in order to communicate with other components in the system 500.
The storage device 508 can include software services 510, 512, 514 for controlling the processor 504. Other hardware or software modules are contemplated. The storage device 508 can be connected to the system connection 506. In one aspect, a hardware module that performs a particular function can include the software component stored in a computer-readable medium in connection with the necessary hardware components, such as the processor 504, connection 506, output device 524, and so forth, to carry out the function.
For clarity of explanation, in some instances the present technology may be presented as including individual functional blocks including functional blocks comprising devices, device components, steps or routines in a method embodied in software, or combinations of hardware and software.
In some example embodiments the computer-readable storage devices, mediums, and memories can include a cable or wireless signal containing a bit stream and the like. However, when mentioned, non-transitory computer-readable storage media expressly exclude media such as energy, carrier signals, electromagnetic waves, and signals per se.
Methods according to the above-described examples can be implemented using computer-executable instructions that are stored or otherwise available from computer readable media. Such instructions can comprise, for example, instructions and data which cause or otherwise configure a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or special purpose processing device to perform a certain function or group of functions. Portions of computer resources used can be accessible over a network. The computer executable instructions may be, for example, binaries, intermediate format instructions such as assembly language, firmware, or source code. Examples of computer-readable media that may be used to store instructions, information used, and/or information created during methods according to described examples include magnetic or optical disks, flash memory, USB devices provided with non-volatile memory, networked storage devices, and so on.
Devices implementing methods according to these disclosures can comprise hardware, firmware and/or software, and can take any of a variety of form factors. Typical examples of such form factors include laptops, smart phones, small form factor personal computers, personal digital assistants, rackmount devices, standalone devices, and so on. Functionality described herein also can be embodied in peripherals or add-in cards. Such functionality can also be implemented on a circuit board among different chips or different processes executing in a single device, by way of further example.
The instructions, media for conveying such instructions, computing resources for executing them, and other structures for supporting such computing resources are means for providing the functions described in these disclosures.
Although a variety of examples and other information was used to explain aspects within the scope of the appended claims, no limitation of the claims should be implied based on particular features or arrangements in such examples, as one of ordinary skill would be able to use these examples to derive a wide variety of implementations. Further and although some subject matter may have been described in language specific to examples of structural features and/or method steps, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to these described features or acts. For example, such functionality can be distributed differently or performed in components other than those identified herein. Rather, the described features and steps are disclosed as examples of components of systems and methods within the scope of the appended claims.
Claim language reciting “at least one of” a set indicates that one member of the set or multiple members of the set satisfy the claim. For example, claim language reciting “at least one of A and B” means A, B, or A and B.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5812773 | Norin | Sep 1998 | A |
5825772 | Dobbins | Oct 1998 | A |
5889896 | Meshinsky et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6108782 | Fletcher et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6178453 | Mattaway et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6298153 | Oishi | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6343290 | Cossins et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6643260 | Kloth et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6683873 | Kwok et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6721804 | Rubin et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6733449 | Krishnamurthy et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6735631 | Oehrke et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6996615 | McGuire | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7054930 | Cheriton | May 2006 | B1 |
7058706 | Lyer et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7062571 | Dale et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7111177 | Chauvel et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7212490 | Kao et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7277948 | Igarashi et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7313667 | Pullela et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7379846 | Williams et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7480672 | Hahn et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7496043 | Leong et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7536476 | Alleyne | May 2009 | B1 |
7567504 | Darling et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7583665 | Duncan et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7606147 | Luft et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7606929 | Gbadegesin | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7644437 | Volpano | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7647594 | Togawa | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7773510 | Back et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7808897 | Mehta et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7881957 | Cohen et al. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7917647 | Cooper et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8010598 | Tanimoto | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8028071 | Mahalingam et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8041714 | Aymeloglu et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8121117 | Amdahl et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8171415 | Appleyard et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8234377 | Cohn | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8244559 | Horvitz et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8250215 | Stienhans et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8280880 | Aymeloglu et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8284664 | Aybay et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8301746 | Head et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8345692 | Smith | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8406141 | Couturier et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8407413 | Yucel et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8448171 | Donnellan et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8477610 | Zuo et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8495356 | Ashok et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8495725 | Ahn | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8510469 | Portolani | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8514868 | Hill | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8532108 | Li et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8533687 | Greifeneder et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8547974 | Guruswamy et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8560639 | Murphy et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8560663 | Baucke et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8589543 | Dutta et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8590050 | Nagpal et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8611356 | Yu et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8612625 | Andreis et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8630291 | Shaffer et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8639787 | Lagergren et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8656024 | Krishnan et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8660129 | Brendel et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8719804 | Jain | May 2014 | B2 |
8775576 | Hebert et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8797867 | Chen et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8805951 | Faibish et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8850002 | Dickinson et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8850182 | Fritz et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8856339 | Mestery et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8909928 | Ahmad et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8918510 | Gmach et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8924720 | Raghuram et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8930747 | Levijarvi et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8938775 | Roth et al. | Jan 2015 | B1 |
8959526 | Kansal et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8977754 | Curry, Jr. et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9009697 | Breiter et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9015324 | Jackson | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9043439 | Bicket et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9049115 | Rajendran et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9063789 | Beaty et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9065727 | Liu et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9075649 | Bushman et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9130846 | Szabo et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9164795 | Vincent | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9167050 | Durazzo et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9201701 | Boldyrev et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9201704 | Chang et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9203784 | Chang et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9223634 | Chang et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9244776 | Koza et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9251114 | Ancin et al. | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9264478 | Hon et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9294408 | Dickinson et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9313048 | Chang et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9361192 | Smith et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9379982 | Krishna et al. | Jun 2016 | B1 |
9380075 | He et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9432245 | Sorenson, III et al. | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9432294 | Sharma et al. | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9444744 | Sharma et al. | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9473365 | Melander et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9503530 | Niedzielski | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9558078 | Farlee et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9571570 | Mutnuru | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9613078 | Vermeulen et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9628471 | Sundaram et al. | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9658876 | Chang et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9692802 | Bicket et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9755858 | Bagepalli et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9847938 | Chanda et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
10498654 | Shalev | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10516496 | Kits van Heyningen | Dec 2019 | B2 |
20010055303 | Horton et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020073337 | Ioele et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020143928 | Maltz et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020166117 | Abrams et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020174216 | Shorey et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030018591 | Komisky | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030056001 | Mate et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030228585 | Inoko et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040004941 | Malan et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040034702 | He | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040088542 | Daude et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040095237 | Chen et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040131059 | Ayyakad et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040197079 | Latvala et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040264481 | Darling et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050060418 | Sorokopud | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050125424 | Herriott et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060062187 | Rune | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060104286 | Cheriton | May 2006 | A1 |
20060126665 | Ward et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060146825 | Hofstaedter et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155875 | Cheriton | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168338 | Bruegl et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060233106 | Achlioptas et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070174663 | Crawford et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070223487 | Kajekar et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070242830 | Conrado et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080005293 | Bhargava et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080080524 | Tsushima et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080084880 | Dharwadkar | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080165778 | Ertemalp | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080198752 | Fan et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080198858 | Townsley et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080201711 | Amir Husain | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080235755 | Blaisdell et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090006527 | Gingell, Jr. et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090019367 | Cavagnari et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090031312 | Mausolf et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090083183 | Rao et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090138763 | Arnold | May 2009 | A1 |
20090177775 | Radia et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090178058 | Stillwell, III et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090182874 | Morford et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090265468 | Annambhotla et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265753 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090293056 | Ferris | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090300608 | Ferris et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090313562 | Appleyard et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090323706 | Germain et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090328031 | Pouyadou et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100036903 | Ahmad et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042720 | Stienhans et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100061250 | Nugent | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100115341 | Baker et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131765 | Bromley et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100149966 | Achlioptas et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100191783 | Mason et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100192157 | Jackson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100205601 | Abbas et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211782 | Auradkar et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100293270 | Augenstein et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100318609 | Lahiri et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100325199 | Park et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100325441 | Laurie et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100333116 | Prahlad et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110016214 | Jackson | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110035754 | Srinivasan | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110055396 | Dehaan | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110055398 | Dehaan et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110055470 | Portolani | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110072489 | Parann-Nissany | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110075667 | Li et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110110382 | Jabr et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110116443 | Yu et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110126099 | Anderson et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110138055 | Daly et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145413 | Dawson et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145657 | Bishop et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110173303 | Rider | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110185063 | Head et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110185065 | Stanisic et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110206052 | Tan et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110213966 | Fu et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110219434 | Betz et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110231715 | Kunii et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110231899 | Pulier et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110239039 | Dieffenbach et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110252327 | Awasthi et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110261811 | Battestilli et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110261828 | Smith | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110276675 | Singh et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110276951 | Jain | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110283013 | Grosser et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110295998 | Ferris et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110305149 | Scott et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110307531 | Gaponenko et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110320870 | Kenigsberg et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120005724 | Lee | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120036234 | Staats et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120054367 | Ramakrishnan et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120072318 | Akiyama et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120072578 | Alam | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120072581 | Tung et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120072985 | Davne et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120072992 | Arasaratnam et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120084445 | Brock et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120084782 | Chou et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120096134 | Suit | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120102193 | Rathore et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120102199 | Hopmann et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120131174 | Ferris et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120137215 | Kawara | May 2012 | A1 |
20120158967 | Sedayao et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159097 | Jennas, II et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120167094 | Suit | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120173710 | Rodriguez | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179909 | Sagi et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120180044 | Donnellan et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120182891 | Lee et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120185913 | Martinez et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120192016 | Gotesdyner et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120192075 | Ebtekar et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120201135 | Ding et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120214506 | Skaaksrud et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120222106 | Kuehl | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120236716 | Anbazhagan et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120240113 | Hur | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120265976 | Spiers et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120272025 | Park et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120281706 | Agarwal et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120281708 | Chauhan et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120290647 | Ellison et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120297238 | Watson et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120311106 | Morgan | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120311568 | Jansen | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120324092 | Brown et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120324114 | Dutta et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130003567 | Gallant et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130013248 | Brugler et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130036213 | Hasan et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130044636 | Koponen et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130066940 | Shao | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130080509 | Wang | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130080624 | Nagai et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130091557 | Gurrapu | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130097601 | Podvratnik et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130104140 | Meng et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130111540 | Sabin | May 2013 | A1 |
20130117337 | Dunham | May 2013 | A1 |
20130124712 | Parker | May 2013 | A1 |
20130125124 | Kempf et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138816 | Kuo et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130144978 | Jain et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130152076 | Patel | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130152175 | Hromoko et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130159097 | Schory et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130159496 | Hamilton et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130160008 | Cawlfield et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130162753 | Hendrickson et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130169666 | Pacheco et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130179941 | McGloin et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130182712 | Aguayo et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130185433 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130191106 | Kephart et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130198374 | Zalmanovitch et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130201989 | Hu et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130204849 | Chacko | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130232491 | Radhakrishnan et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130246588 | Borowicz et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130250770 | Zou et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130254415 | Fullen et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130262347 | Dodson | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130283364 | Chang et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130297769 | Chang et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130318240 | Hebert et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130318546 | Kothuri et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130339949 | Spiers et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140006481 | Frey et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140006535 | Reddy | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140006585 | Dunbar et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140040473 | Ho et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140040883 | Tompkins | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140052877 | Mao | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140056146 | Hu et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140059310 | Du et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140074850 | Noel et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140075048 | Yuksel et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140075108 | Dong et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140075357 | Flores et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140075501 | Srinivasan et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140089727 | Cherkasova et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140098762 | Ghai et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140108985 | Scott et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140122560 | Ramey et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140136779 | Guha et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140140211 | Chandrasekaran et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140141720 | Princen et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140156557 | Zeng et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140164486 | Ravichandran et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140188825 | Muthukkaruppan et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140189095 | Lindberg et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140189125 | Amies et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140215471 | Cherkasova | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140222953 | Karve et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140233384 | Howard | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140244851 | Lee | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140245298 | Zhou et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140281173 | Im et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140282536 | Dave et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140282611 | Campbell et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140282889 | Ishaya et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140289200 | Kato | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140295831 | Karra et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140297569 | Clark et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140297835 | Buys | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140310391 | Sorensen, III et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140310417 | Sorensen, III et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140310418 | Sorensen, III et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140314078 | Jilani | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140317261 | Shatzkamer et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140321278 | Cafarelli et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140330976 | van Bemmel | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140330977 | van Bemmel | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140334488 | Guichard et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140362682 | Guichard et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140365680 | van Bemmel | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140366155 | Chang et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140369204 | Anand et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140372567 | Ganesh et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140379938 | Bosch et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150033086 | Sasturkar et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150043576 | Dixon et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150052247 | Threefoot et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150052517 | Raghu et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150058382 | St. Laurent et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150058459 | Amendjian et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150071285 | Kumar et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150085870 | Narasimha et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150089082 | Patwardhan et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150100471 | Curry, Jr. et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150103827 | Quinn et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150106802 | Ivanov et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150106805 | Melander et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150117199 | Chinnaiah Sankaran et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150117458 | Gurkan et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150120914 | Wada et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150124622 | Kovvali et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150138973 | Kumar et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150178133 | Phelan et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150189009 | van Bemmel | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150215819 | Bosch et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150227405 | Jan et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150242204 | Hassine et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150249709 | Teng et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150263901 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150280980 | Bitar | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150281067 | Wu | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150281113 | Siciliano et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150309908 | Pearson et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150319063 | Zourzouvillys et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150326524 | Tankala et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150339210 | Kopp et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150358850 | La Roche, Jr. et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150365324 | Kumar et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150373108 | Fleming et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160011925 | Kulkarni et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160013990 | Kulkarni et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160026684 | Mukherjee et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160062786 | Meng et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160094389 | Jain et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160094398 | Choudhury et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160094453 | Jain et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160094454 | Jain et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160094455 | Jain et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160094456 | Jain et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160094480 | Kulkarni et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160094643 | Jain et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160099847 | Melander et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160099853 | Nedeltchev et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160099864 | Akiya et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160105393 | Thakkar et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160127184 | Bursell | May 2016 | A1 |
20160134557 | Steinder et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160156708 | Jalan et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160164780 | Timmons et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160164914 | Madhav et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160182378 | Basavaraja et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160188527 | Cherian et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160234071 | Nambiar et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160239399 | Babu et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160253078 | Ebtekar et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160254968 | Ebtekar et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160261564 | Foxhoven et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160277355 | Shetty et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160277368 | Narayanaswamy et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170005948 | Melander et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170024260 | Chandrasekaran et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170026294 | Basavaraja et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170026470 | Bhargava et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170041342 | Efremov et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170054659 | Ergin et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170093921 | Duan | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170097841 | Chang et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170099188 | Chang et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170104755 | Arregoces et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170147297 | Krishnamurthy et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170149878 | Mutnuru | May 2017 | A1 |
20170163531 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170171158 | Hoy et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170214550 | Kumar | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170264663 | Bicket et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170339070 | Chang et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180143885 | Dong | May 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101719930 | Jun 2010 | CN |
101394360 | Jul 2011 | CN |
102164091 | Aug 2011 | CN |
104320342 | Jan 2015 | CN |
105740084 | Jul 2016 | CN |
2228719 | Sep 2010 | EP |
2439637 | Apr 2012 | EP |
2645253 | Nov 2014 | EP |
10-2015-0070676 | May 2015 | KR |
M394537 | Dec 2010 | TW |
WO-2004043014 | May 2004 | WO |
W0 2009155574 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO 2010030915 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO 2013158707 | Oct 2013 | WO |
2016187168 | Nov 2016 | WO |
2017053441 | Mar 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Cask Data, Inc., Flows and Flowlets, 2014-2016, https://docs.cask.co/cdap/3.6.0/en/developers-manual/building-blocks/flows-flowlets/index.html. (Year: 2016). |
Amedro, Brian, et al., “An Efficient Framework for Running Applications on Clusters, Grids and Cloud,” 2010, 17 pages. |
Author Unknown, “5 Benefits of a Storage Gateway in the Cloud,” Blog, TwinStrata, Inc., Jul. 25, 2012, XP055141645, 4 pages, https://web.archive.org/web/20120725092619/http://blog.twinstrata.com/2012/07/10//5-benefits-of-a-storage-gateway-in-the-cloud. |
Author Unknown, “Joint Cisco and VMWare Solution for Optimizing Virtual Desktop Delivery: Data Center 3.0: Solutions to Accelerate Data Center Virtualization,” Cisco Systems, Inc. and VMware, Inc., Sep. 2008, 10 pages. |
Author Unknown, “A Look at DeltaCloud: The Multi-Cloud API,” Feb. 17, 2012, 4 pages. |
Author Unknown, “About Deltacloud,” Apache Software Foundation, Aug. 18, 2013, 1 page. |
Author Unknown, “Architecture for Managing Clouds, A White Paper from the Open Cloud Standards Incubator,” Version 1.0.0, Document No. DSP-IS0102, Jun. 18, 2010, 57 pages. |
Author Unknown, “Cloud Infrastructure Management Interface—Common Information Model (CIMI-CIM),” Document No. DSP0264, Version 1.0.0, Dec. 14, 2012, 21 pages. |
Author Unknown, “Cloud Infrastructure Management Interface (CIMI) Primer,” Document No. DSP2027, Version 1.0.1, Sep. 12, 2012, 30 pages. |
Author Unknown, “cloudControl Documentation,” Aug. 25, 2013, 14 pages. |
Author Unknown, “Interoperable Clouds, A White Paper from the Open Cloud Standards Incubator,” Version 1.0.0, Document No. DSP-IS0101, Nov. 11, 2009, 21 pages. |
Author Unknown, “Microsoft Cloud Edge Gateway (MCE) Series Appliance,” Iron Networks, Inc., 2014, 4 pages. |
Author Unknown, “Open Data Center Alliance Usage: Virtual Machine (VM) Interoperability in a Hybrid Cloud Environment Rev. 1.2,” Open Data Center Alliance, Inc., 2013, 18 pages. |
Author Unknown, “Real-Time Performance Monitoring on Juniper Networks Devices, Tips and Tools for Assessing and Analyzing Network Efficiency,” Juniper Networks, Inc., May 2010, 35 pages. |
Author Unknown, “Use Cases and Interactions for Managing Clouds, A White Paper from the Open Cloud Standards Incubator,” Version 1.0.0, Document No. DSP-ISO0103, Jun. 16, 2010, 75 pages. |
Author Unknown, “Apache Ambari Meetup What's New,” Hortonworks Inc., Sep. 2013, 28 pages. |
Author Unknown, “Introduction,” Apache Ambari project, Apache Software Foundation, 2014, 1 page. |
Baker, F., “Requirements for IP Version 4 Routers,” Jun. 1995, 175 pages, Network Working Group, Cisco Systems. |
Beyer, Steffen, “Module “Data::Locations?!”,” YAPC::Europe, London, UK,ICA, Sep. 22-24, 2000, XP002742700, 15 pages. |
Blanchet, M., “A Flexible Method for Managing the Assignment of Bits of an IPv6 Address Block,” Apr. 2003, 8 pages, Network Working Group, Viagnie. |
Borovick, Lucinda, et al., “Architecting the Network for the Cloud,” IDC White Paper, Jan. 2011, 8 pages. |
Bosch, Greg, “Virtualization,” last modified Apr. 2012 by B. Davison, 33 pages. |
Broadcasters Audience Research Board, “What's Next,” http://lwww.barb.co.uk/whats-next, accessed Jul. 22, 2015, 2 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc. “Best Practices in Deploying Cisco Nexus 1000V Series Switches on Cisco UCS B and C Series Cisco UCS Manager Servers,” Cisco White Paper, Apr. 2011, 36 pages, http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps9441/ps9902/white_paper_c11-558242.pdf. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco Unified Network Services: Overcome Obstacles to Cloud-Ready Deployments,” Cisco White Paper, Jan. 2011, 6 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco Intercloud Fabric: Hybrid Cloud with Choice, Consistency, Control and Compliance,” Dec. 10, 2014, 22 pages. |
Cisco Technology, Inc., “Cisco Expands Videoscape TV Platform Into the Cloud,” Jan. 6, 2014, Las Vegas, Nevada, Press Release, 3 pages. |
Citrix, “Citrix StoreFront 2.0” White Paper, Proof of Concept Implementation Guide, Citrix Systems, Inc., 2013, 48 pages. |
Citrix, “CloudBridge for Microsoft Azure Deployment Guide,” 30 pages. |
Citrix, “Deployment Practices and Guidelines for NetScaler 10.5 on Amazon Web Services,” White Paper, citrix.com, 2014, 14 pages. |
CSS Corp, “Enterprise Cloud Gateway (ECG)—Policy driven framework for managing multi-cloud environments,” original published on or about Feb. 11, 2012; 1 page; http://www.css-cloud.com/platform/enterprise-cloud-gateway.php. |
Fang K., “LISP MAC-EID-TO-RLOC Mapping (LISP based L2VPN),” Network Working Group, Internet Draft, Cisco Systems, Jan. 2012, 12 pages. |
Ford, Bryan, et al., Peer-to-Peer Communication Across Network Address Translators, in USENIX Annual Technical Conference, 2005, pp. 179-192. |
Gedymin, Adam, “Cloud Computing with an emphasis on Google App Engine,” Sep. 2011, 146 pages. |
Good, Nathan A., “Use Apache Deltacloud to administer multiple instances with a single API,” Dec. 17, 2012, 7 pages. |
Herry, William, “Keep It Simple, Stupid: OpenStack nova-scheduler and its algorithm”, May 12, 2012, IBM, 12 pages. |
Hewlett-Packard Company, “Virtual context management on network devices”, Research Disclosure, vol. 564, No. 60, Apr. 1, 2011, Mason Publications, Hampshire, GB, Apr. 1, 2011, 524. |
Juniper Networks, Inc., “Recreating Real Application Traffic in Junosphere Lab,” Solution Brief, Dec. 2011, 3 pages. |
Kenhui, “Musings on Cloud Computing and IT-as-a-Service: [Updated for Havana] Openstack Computer for VSphere Admins, Part 2: Nova-Scheduler and DRS”, Jun. 26, 2013, Cloud Architect Musings, 12 pages. |
Kolyshkin, Kirill, “Virtualization in Linux,” Sep. 1, 2006, XP055141648, 5 pages, https://web.archive.org/web/20070120205111/http://download.openvz.org/doc/openvz-intro.pdf. |
Kumar, S., et al., “Infrastructure Service Forwarding for NSH,” Service Function Chaining Internet Draft, draft-kumar-sfc-nsh-forwarding-00, Dec. 5, 2015, 10 pages. |
Kunz, Thomas, et al., “OmniCloud—The Secure and Flexible Use of Cloud Storage Services,” 2014, 30 pages. |
Lerach, S.R.O., “Golem,” http://www.lerach.cz/en/products/golem, accessed Jul. 22, 2015, 2 pages. |
Linthicum, David, “VM Import could be a game changer for hybrid clouds”, InfoWorld, Dec. 23, 2010, 4 pages. |
Logan, Marcus, “Hybrid Cloud Application Architecture for Elastic Java-Based Web Applications,” F5 Deployment Guide Version 1.1, 2016, 65 pages. |
Lynch, Sean, “Monitoring cache with Claspin” Facebook Engineering, Sep. 19, 2012, 5 pages. |
Meireles, Fernando Miguel Dias, “Integrated Management of Cloud Computing Resources,” 2013-2014, 286 pages. |
Meraki, “meraki releases industry's first cloud-managed routers,” Jan. 13, 2011, 2 pages. |
Mu, Shuai, et al., “uLibCloud: Providing High Available and Uniform Accessing to Multiple Cloud Storages,” 2012 IEEE, 8 pages. |
Naik, Vijay K., et al., “Harmony: A Desktop Grid for Delivering Enterprise Computations,” Grid Computing, 2003, Fourth International Workshop on Proceedings, Nov. 17, 2003, pp. 1-11. |
Nair, Srijith K. et al., “Towards Secure Cloud Bursting, Brokerage and Aggregation,” 2012, 8 pages, www.flexiant.com. |
Nielsen, “SimMetry Audience Measurement—Technology,” http://www.nielsen-admosphere.eu/products-and-services/simmetry-audience-measurement-technology/, accessed Jul. 22, 2015, 6 pages. |
Nielsen, “Television,” http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/solutions/measurement/television.html, accessed Jul. 22, 2015, 4 pages. |
Open Stack, “Filter Scheduler,” updated Dec. 17, 2017, 5 pages, accessed on Dec. 18, 2017, https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/user/filter-scheduler.html. |
Quinn, P., et al., “Network Service Header,” Internet Engineering Task Force Draft, Jul. 3, 2014, 27 pages. |
Quinn, P., et al., “Service Function Chaining (SFC) Architecture,” Network Working Group, Internet Draft, draft-quinn-sfc-arch-03.txt, Jan. 22, 2014, 21 pages. |
Rabadan, J., et al., “Operational Aspects of Proxy-ARP/ND in EVPN Networks,” BESS Worksgroup Internet Draft, draft-snr-bess-evpn-proxy-arp-nd-02, Oct. 6, 2015, 22 pages. |
Saidi, Ali, et al., “Performance Validation of Network-Intensive Workloads on a Full-System Simulator,” Interaction between Operating System and Computer Architecture Workshop, (IOSCA 2005), Austin, Texas, Oct. 2005, 10 pages. |
Shunra, “Shunra for HP Software; Enabling Confidence in Application Performance Before Deployment,” 2010, 2 pages. |
Son, Jungmin, “Automatic decision system for efficient resource selection and allocation in inter-clouds,” Jun. 2013, 35 pages. |
Sun, Aobing, et al., “IaaS Public Cloud Computing Platform Scheduling Model and Optimization Analysis,” Int. J. Communications, Network and System Sciences, 2011, 4, 803-811, 9 pages. |
Szymaniak, Michal, et al., “Latency-Driven Replica Placement”, vol. 47 No. 8, IPSJ Journal, Aug. 2006, 12 pages. |
Toews, Everett, “Introduction to Apache jclouds,” Apr. 7, 2014, 23 pages. |
Von Laszewski, Gregor, et al., “Design of a Dynamic Provisioning System for a Federated Cloud and Bare-metal Environment,” 2012, 8 pages. |
Wikipedia, “Filter (software)”, Wikipedia, Feb. 8, 2014, 2 pages, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Filter_%28software%29&oldid=594544359. |
Wikipedia; “Pipeline (Unix)”, Wikipedia, May 4, 2014, 4 pages, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pipeline2/028Unix%29&oldid=606980114. |
Ye, Xianglong, et al., “A Novel Blocks Placement Strategy for Hadoop,” 2012 IEEE/ACTS 11th International Conference on Computer and Information Science, 2012 IEEE, 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200036796 A1 | Jan 2020 | US |