The invention relates to the field of containers, such as bottles or jars, made of plastic material, obtained by blow molding or stretch-blow molding from a parison (whether it is a preform or an intermediate container having undergone a pre-blow molding operation of a preform), and comprising a body, which extends at an upper end by a neck through which the filling and the emptying of the container are performed, and, at a lower end, by a bottom that closes the container.
The operations of blow molding and of stretch-blow molding, performed in a mold having the impression of the container, impart to the material a certain rigidity, resulting from the double orientation that it undergoes, both axially (parallel to the general axis of the mold—or of the container) and radially (perpendicular to the axis).
This rigidity is not, however, always sufficient to enable the container to withstand the stresses—both external and internal—to which it is subjected during its life cycle, as soon as it is filled.
The internal stresses comprise, primarily, the temperature or the pressure of the contents.
It is known to initiate thermosetting (i.e., thermal crystallization) to increase the resistance of the container to deformations resulting from thermal stresses experienced during a hot filling (on the order of 90° C. for certain beverages such as pasteurized fruit juices or even tea). Thermosetting, however, because of its cost and its high cycle time, cannot be generalized to more ordinary applications such as plain water.
It is also known to resort to particular bottom shapes, referred to as petaloids, comprising projecting feet, whose apexes define a standing plane for the container, separated by deep valleys, which offer an increased resistance to the high internal pressure caused by certain contents (particularly carbonated beverages). The petaloid-shaped bottoms, because of the complexity of their shapes and the depth of their valleys (this depth represents generally at least 50% of the overall diameter of the bottom), however, require a relatively large amount of material, which makes them unsuited to the ordinary applications such as plain water, for which instead it is sought to minimize the amount of material used.
The external stresses comprise, primarily, the axial compression forces to which the palletized containers are subjected, each container supporting the weight of the column of containers above it. If the thermoset containers and/or containers having a petaloid-shaped bottom generally support this type of stress well, thanks to their increased mechanical performance, the containers allocated to the ordinary applications such as plain water bear them less readily, and crushing events are sometimes unfortunate during the palletizing of this type of container.
It is known to make the bottoms of these types of containers rigid by means of radial ribs that extend from a central area of the bottom and spread from the bottom through the standing plane formed by it, see, for example, French patent FR 2 932 458 (SIDEL) or its U.S. equivalent US 2009/308835. The performance offered by this bottom is good, but it is, however, desirable to improve it to minimize the crushing risks and thus to promote the stability of the pallets. It should be noted that the widening alone of the grooves, which could make the bottom rigid, is not necessarily a good solution, because it results in a greater difficulty in blow molding the bottom (in other words, it diminishes the blowability of the container—i.e., its ability to be correctly blow molded).
A first objective is to propose a container whose bottom exhibits, given an equal amount of material, improved mechanical performance, or performance that is identical with a reduced amount of material.
A second objective is to propose a container whose bottom exhibits an improved blowability.
A third objective is to propose a container whose bottom imparts to it a better mechanical resistance to crushing under axial compression.
For this purpose, a container made of plastic material is proposed, said container comprising a body that extends along a main axis, and a bottom that extends at a lower end of the body, the bottom being provided with projecting feet having apexes that extend into a common standing plane, the feet being separated into pairs by recessed grooves that extend radially from a central area of the bottom, each foot exhibiting two sides that each laterally border a groove, the sides of two adjacent feet bordering the same groove forming between them, in the area of the standing plane and in a plane crosswise to the radial direction of extension of the groove, an angle A at the obtuse apex.
Under axial compression, the angle A has a tendency to be opened, which makes possible a slight axial compression of the bottom, having as a consequence an increase in the pressure of the contents of the container, and therefore a greater rigidity of it.
Various additional characteristics can be envisaged, alone or in combination:
where D is an overall transverse dimension of the bottom, measured at its junction with the body.
Other objects and advantages of the invention will come to light from the description of an embodiment, given below with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
Shown in
This container 1 comprises, at an upper end, a threaded neck 2, provided with a rim 3. In the extension of the neck 2, the container 1 comprises in its upper part a shoulder 4 that flares out in the direction opposite the neck 2, this shoulder 4 being extended by a lateral wall or body 5, with a generally rotationally cylindrical shape around a main axis X of the container 1.
The container 1 further comprises a bottom 6 that extends opposite the neck 2, from a lower end of the body 5. Marked D is an overall crosswise dimension of the bottom 6, measured at its junction with the body 5. When the shape of the container 1 is circular, as in the example illustrated, the overall crosswise dimension D of the bottom 6 corresponds to its overall diameter.
The bottom 6 is provided with feet 7 that are formed by protrusions projecting toward the exterior of the container 1 and that extend from a central area 8 of the bottom 6; said central area 8 extends recessed toward the interior of the container 1 and includes a button 9 obtained from the injection molding of the preform from which the container 1 comes, and where the material has remained approximately amorphous.
Each foot 7 has a lower face 10 that is arched with concavity turned toward the exterior of the container 1. As illustrated in
As can be seen in
As illustrated in
Because of the slight height of the feet 7, the bottom 6 should not be considered as a petaloid-shaped bottom. More specifically, as illustrated in
More specifically, in the example illustrated, H and D have a ratio such that:
By comparison, in a petaloid-shaped bottom, the depth of the valleys perpendicular to the standing plane has a ratio on the order of less than ⅕ with the overall crosswise dimension of the bottom.
As is seen in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
The angle A at the apex between the sides 17 bordering the same groove 15 is preferably between 90° and 150°. According to a preferred embodiment, illustrated in the figures, the angle A is about 120°.
Each side 17 is preferably concave, having concavity turned toward the exterior of the container 1. As is clearly seen in the inset of
Each side 17 is connected, on the one hand, to the apex 11 of the foot 7, and, on the other hand, to the groove 15, by small-radius fillets.
Furthermore, as is clearly seen in
Together, two sides 17 bordering the same groove 15 define, in a plane parallel to the standing plane 12, a maximum angular opening B (centered on the axis X and measured in the standing plane 12 between the outer edges of the central portions of the sides 17). The angular opening B is, preferably, greater than the angular opening C defined by each apex 11. According to a preferred embodiment illustrated in the figures, the angular opening B is in a ratio with the angular opening C defined by each apex, such that:
As is seen in the figures, and more clearly in
The step 20 extends continuously, i.e., it is interrupted neither on a level with the grooves 15 but extends to the bottom of them, nor on a level with the feet 7 but extends straddling them, even on their lower faces 10 and on their sides 17.
In the embodiment shown, where the container 1 has an approximately rotationally cylindrical shape around its axis X, the step 20 forms a ring having a circular contour.
By the presence of the axial step 20, the central region 18 of the bottom 6 is found slightly offset in height in relation to the peripheral region 19 toward the interior of the container 1.
The step 20 has the function of maintaining the stability of the container 1 by making the bottom 6 rigid in its median region.
Thus structured, the bottom 6 has a good blowability (thanks in particular to the large angular opening A of the sides 17), while imparting to the container 1 a better mechanical performance than an ordinary container having an equivalent amount of material.
Actually, under the effect of an axial compression (indicated by the arrow in
The result is a slight deformation by axial compression of the bottom 6, which causes a translational movement of the whole body 5 (without significant deformation of it, because of its annulated structure with small radii of curvatures) in the direction of the standing plane 12, as illustrated in broken lines in
This general deformation has the effect of putting the contents of the container 1 under pressure, and as a consequence increasing the rigidity of the container 1, benefiting its resistance to the axial compression. The bottom 6, and more generally the container 1, thus act as a compression spring whose stiffness increases with the axially-applied compression force.
The step 20 makes it possible to limit the axial deformation of the bottom 6 by forming a piston that forms an end-of-travel stop that, under the effect of a strong axial compression stress, joins the standing plane 12 and thus increases the contact surface of the container with its support.
The result of these advantages is that it is possible to palletize the container 1 without significant risk of deformation, which makes it possible to increase productivity and to facilitate the handling of the pallets.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
13 53759 | Apr 2013 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2014/050980 | 4/22/2014 | WO | 00 |