1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates generally to a laminated sealing member for closing the mouth of a container, the sealing member having a graspable tab on its upper surface to expedite its removal from the container, and the sealing member also having a holographic security seal layer.
2. Description of the Related Art
In the figures, the first digit of the reference numbers correspond to the figure number. The remaining two digits of the reference numbers for elements within the various figures that correspond to each other always match. Hence, the bottom hot melt adhesive layer, which is essentially same in all of the figures, is assigned the reference number 122 in
It is often desirable to seal a bottle, jar, or other container having a screw-on cap by providing a sealing member that attaches across the mouth of the container before the cap is screwed down onto the container for the first time. When the cap is later removed after purchase, the purchaser must penetrate, break, or otherwise remove the sealing member before the contents of the container may be accessed. The cap may then be screwed back into place to keep the contents fresh and to keep the contents from spilling out. If the sealing member is not present when the container is first opened, or if it is damaged, then the purchaser knows that the contents of the container may have been tampered with. And as an anti-counterfeiting measure, such a sealing member may include a hologram visible to the purchaser after the cap is removed, the pattern of the hologram being a unique identifier of a particular manufacturer.
Many sealing members are known which have tabs attached to their upper surface to facilitate their removal. One simply grasps the tab and pulls it to one side, and the entire sealing member is removed from the container in a single motion.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,514,442, which issued to Michael P. Galda, et al. on May 7, 1996 discloses the sealing member 100 shown, in a side cross-sectional view, in
U.S. Pat. No. 6,866,926, which issued to Joe Smelko et al on Mar. 15, 2005, teaches the design of an improved sealing member 200 which is shown, in a side cross-sectional view, in
Several patents teach the incorporation of holographic film into various types of seals for packages and containers. Such holographic sealing members enable counterfeit products to be identified and also signal, by their condition when the seals have previously been tampered with.
Once such Holographic seal is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,319,475, which issued to Ralph Kay, et al. on Jun. 7, 1994. This patent discloses a package sealing tape having a layered structure. Its upper layer is a removable layer formed from polypropylene or polyester film, smooth and transparent. This upper layer is loosely adhered (by means of wax or corona discharge treatment) to a much thinner, transparent polymer layer. The polymer layer is bonded to an embossable lacquer layer formed from non-cross-linkable polyurethane or polyester. This layer is embossed to define a hologram, and then a metallic film, such as aluminum, is deposited upon this layer and is optionally coated with a polymeric coating. The lowest layer is a pressure sensitive transfer adhesive bound to release paper. In use, the release paper is removed, and then the tape is used to seal a container. The upper layer is scuff resistant, so it may be left on during transit to protect the hologram. It may also be removed. In the face of solvents or heat, the embossable layer and its hologram is quickly and irreversibly damaged, thus making a permanent record of the attempt at tampering with the package. A similar arrangement is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,659,507, issued to Michael Banahan, et al. on Dec. 9, 2003, which also provides an additional fluorescent pattern visible only under ultraviolet light and a mechanism that breaks up the hologram if the layers are separated.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,012,032, which issued to Steven R. Consentino, et al. on Mar. 14, 2006, discloses in FIG. 3 of the '302 patent a holographic image (col. 7, lines 20-34 of the '032 patent) applied as the top layer in a laminated sealing member for a “bottle type container” with an upper PET layer, an intermediate thermal bonding polymer layer (a co polyester resin), and a lower woven or non-woven reinforcing scrim polymer layer (polyester such as PET) beneath which is an adhesive layer. In its “Background” portion, the '302 patent says: “seals and lids can be constructed to have a tab that extends outwardly from the periphery of the seal so that a user can grasp the tap to aid in removing the seal from the container.” ('032 patent, col. 1, lines 37-40) FIG. 3 of the '032 patent discloses a tab 33 that is somehow attached to, and extending outwards from, the periphery of the lowest adhesive layer. The text accompanying this figure says: “Preferably the seal contains a small tab to facilitate removal.” Nothing more is said about this tab.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,892,209, which issued to Jan L. Dorfman, et al. on Jan. 9, 1990, discloses a liquor bottle capping assembly which includes a sealing member that comprises two parts: First, a lower circular disk, made of aluminum or “high durometer plastic” or some other material sufficiently strong to resist and/or provide evidence of penetration by a hypodermic needle; and second, an upper circular sheet member 26 that is adhesively laminated to the lower circular disk 60. The upper circular sheet member may be made of metal foil and may carry a laser-imprinted hologram obtained from American Bank Note Holographics, Inc. Alternatively, the circular disk 80 may be constructed from plastic film, metallised plastic, or some other material that will provide evidence of any tampering. The upper circular sheet member initially has a figure-8 shape, and it is folded back upon itself to form joined upper and lower circular portions, the lower circular portion forming the circular sheet member itself, and the upper circular portion forming a removal tab of slightly smaller diameter, as is illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2 of the '209 patent.
Briefly summarized, the present invention relates to a holographic sealing member for a container designed for attachment to the rim of an opening in the container. The sealing member comprises a holographic layer having an upper plastic layer on its upper side and a lower embossed image layer on its lower side, having a sealant or adhesive layer attached to at least those portions of the lower side of the holographic layer that are intended to come into direct contact with the container's rim when the sealing member is placed upon and is sealed to the container, and having a metal foil layer over and covering and adhesively bonded to the upper side of the holographic layer that may be inductively heated to actuate the heat actuated sealant. A tab covers and is adhesively bonded to the metal foil layer and may be pulled to remove the sealing member from a container. After this sealing member is attached to a container, and when the tab is pulled to remove the sealing member from the container, almost the entire sealing member pulls away from the container, but those portions of the holographic layer's lower embossed image layer that are attached directly to the rim of the container by the sealant or adhesive layer remain attached to the rim of the container to form a hologram that runs around the container's rim.
A sealing member 300 for a container 324 is designed in accordance with a first embodiment of the present invention and is illustrated in
The structure of the sealing member 300 (
Accordingly, when the tab formed by the layers 302, 304, and 306 is pulled, all of the uppermost layers 302, 304, 308, 310, and 307 of the sealing member 300 are pulled away along with all save a thin peripheral ring of the embossed image layer 309, leaving only a thin peripheral ring 309A (see
Accordingly, a circular ring of the embossed image layer 309A remains bonded to the land area of the container 324 after the sealing member 300 is removed. Thus, a thin ring of the hologram which the embossed image layer 309A carries remains attached to the upper lip of the container 324, while the remainder of the embossed image layer 309 is peeled away and is removed from the container 324 and is separated from the circular ring portion 309A of the layer 309. Hence, removal of the tab (formed by the layers 302, 304, and 306) necessarily produces destruction of the hologram such that the holographic seal borne by the embossed image layer 309 is torn through and can never be reassembled and reattached to the container 324.
The sealing member 300 is thus entirely removed in a single motion, but the ring portion 309A of the embossed image layer 309 remains behind, attached to the land area of the container 324, torn away from the remainder of the embossed image layer 309 in a way that destroys the hologram and makes it impossible to re-seal the sealing member 300 back onto the container 324. After the sealing member 300 is removed from the container 324, the holographic image is visible on the top side of the rim of the container 324. It is not possible to reseal the container.
The bonding of the PET layer 307 to the embossed image layer 309 is carefully controlled to set the amount of adhesion that exists between the PET layer 307 and the embossed image layer 309. This bonding strength must be low enough so that when force is applied to the tab formed by layers 302, 304, and 306, the sealing member 300 splits at the splitting point 311 around the periphery of the sealing member 300 but only above the land area of the container 324, thus permitting most of the embossed image layer 309 to be ripped away still attached to the layers 302, 304, 306, and 307 but leaving behind the ring portion 309A of the embossed image layer 309 attached to the land area of the container 324, as is shown in
The PET layer 307, the embossed image layer 309, and the bond between them are preferably chosen to be relatively heat insensitive so that overheating by inductive heating of the hot melt bonding material or adhesive layer 322 does not adversely affect the amount of effort that is required to remove the sealing member 300. In conventional designs, such as that shown in
In another embodiment of the invention illustrated in
The heat activated hot melt bonding material or adhesive layer 322 in
With reference to
The sealing member 500 is also similar to the sealing member 200 shown in
The strength of the bond between the layers 507 and 509 is chosen to cause the sealing member 500 to split apart at 511 when the tab formed by the layers 506, 504, and 502 is pulled upwards and to the side. Accordingly, when the tab formed by the layers 506, 504, and 502 is pulled, the sealing member 500 splits apart at the splitting point 511, uncovering the hologram which is visible in the embossed image layer 509 and leaving in place the seal formed by the aluminum layer 510 that is bonded to the embossed image layer 509.
After removing the upper layers 502, 504, 506, 508, and 507 of the sealing member 500 by pulling on the tab formed by the layers 506, 504, and 502, an individual wishing to access the container (not shown) must then pierce the remaining layers 509 and 510, thus breaking the holographic seal over the container. Hence, the seal on the container cannot be broken without the simultaneous destruction of the hologram.
This design again uses ABNH PET holographic film. The chemistry of the image layer of this product supports heat resistance for the image. The image layer is highly cross-linked, and this gives the film superior heat resistance and also explains why the bond between the layers within the holographic film tend to be relatively weaker. Many holographic films do not have this heat resistance, especially if the image is cast on a polypropylene film. Since induction container sealing can produce temperatures that can be in the range of 350 to 450 degrees Centigrade, if the holographic film technology does not possess adequate heat resistance, then the image or film or both would become distorted during induction heating, particularly when excessive heating is applied.
By removing, separating, or splitting the PET layer away from the image layer, the image of the hologram remains undisturbed and completely legible above only an easily pierced layer of foil and sealant and can be destroyed by simply puncturing it with a finger. If the PET layer were not stripped away when the tab layers were pulled away, then the PET layer would need to have sufficient heat stability, and it would also have to maintain the integrity of the image layer. It would be difficult to puncture through the lining of such a structure.
An alternative arrangement omits the white PET layer 508 and the bonding material 516 and has the EVA layer 504 bonded directly to the PET layer 507.
While several embodiments of the invention have been described, numerous alternatives will occur to those skilled in the art. The claims appended to and forming a part of this patent application are intended to cover all such alternatives that fall within the true scope of the invention.
This application claims priority pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/896,820, filed on Mar. 23, 2007 which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4013188 | Ray | Mar 1977 | A |
4206165 | Dukess | Jun 1980 | A |
4266687 | Cummings | May 1981 | A |
4438850 | Kahn | Mar 1984 | A |
4514248 | Cummings | Apr 1985 | A |
4579240 | Ou-Yang | Apr 1986 | A |
4650082 | Paciorek | Mar 1987 | A |
4741791 | Howard et al. | May 1988 | A |
4767016 | Cook, Jr. et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4837061 | Smits et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4856857 | Takeuchi et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4892209 | Dorfman et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4934544 | Han et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4961986 | Galda et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4980222 | Rivera et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4994314 | Rosenfeld et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5004111 | McCarthy | Apr 1991 | A |
5015318 | Smits et al. | May 1991 | A |
5055150 | Rosenfeld et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5057365 | Finkelstein et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5071710 | Smits et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5084143 | Smith | Jan 1992 | A |
5098495 | Smits et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5128779 | Mallik | Jul 1992 | A |
5135262 | Smith et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5149386 | Smits et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5153042 | Indrelie | Oct 1992 | A |
5160767 | Genske et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5169707 | Faykish et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5178967 | Rosenfeld et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5197618 | Goth | Mar 1993 | A |
5218472 | Jozefowicz et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5226281 | Han et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5265745 | Pereyra et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5319475 | Kay et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5510171 | Faykish | Apr 1996 | A |
5514442 | Galda et al. | May 1996 | A |
5544770 | Travisano | Aug 1996 | A |
5598940 | Finkelstein et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5601200 | Finkelstein et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5615789 | Finkelstein et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5656360 | Faykish et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5669521 | Wiening et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5702015 | Giles et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
6082566 | Yousif et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6120882 | Faykish et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6131754 | Smelko | Oct 2000 | A |
6139931 | Finkelstein et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6194042 | Finkelstein et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6258425 | Parmentier et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6284337 | Lorimor et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6312776 | Finkelstein et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6351537 | Dovgodko et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6378715 | Finkelstein et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6458302 | Shifflet | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6494491 | Zeiter et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6531230 | Weber et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6602309 | Vizulis et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6659507 | Banahan | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6699566 | Zeiter et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6705467 | Kancsar et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6722272 | Jud | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6737154 | Jonza et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6767425 | Meier | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6775036 | Cox et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6866926 | Smelko et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6902075 | O'Brien et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6916516 | Gerber et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6955736 | Rosenberger et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6974045 | Trombach et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7005178 | Bonkowski et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7012032 | Cosentino et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7029745 | Bonkowski et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7064897 | Hebrink et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7128210 | Razeti et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7144617 | Schilling et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7182475 | Kramer et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7224528 | Phillips et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
RE39790 | Fuchs et al. | Aug 2007 | E |
7316760 | Nageli | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7448153 | Maliner et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7531228 | Perre et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7713605 | Yousif et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7740927 | Yousif et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7819266 | Ross et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7838109 | Declerck | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20020068140 | Finkelstein et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20040109963 | Zaggia et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040209028 | Gosselin | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050048307 | Schubert et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050208242 | Smelko et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060000545 | Nageli et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060003120 | Nageli et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060003122 | Nageli et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060151415 | Smelko et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070058227 | Raksha et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070183047 | Phillips et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070195392 | Phillips et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070206249 | Phillips et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070298273 | Thies et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080026171 | Gullick et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080103262 | Haschke et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080156443 | Schaefer et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080233424 | Thorstensen-Woll et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080257850 | O'Keefe-Broadbent | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090078671 | Triquet et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090208729 | Allegaert et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100009162 | Rothweiler | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100030180 | Declerck | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100059942 | Rothweiler | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100116410 | Yousif | May 2010 | A1 |
20100155288 | Harper et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100170820 | Leplatois et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100213193 | Helmlinger et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100221483 | Gonzalez Carro et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100290663 | Trassl et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100314278 | Fonteyne et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110000917 | Wolters et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110005961 | Leplatois et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110091715 | Rakutt et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
501 393 | Aug 2006 | AT |
11 738 | Apr 2011 | AT |
8200231 | Sep 2003 | BR |
0300992 | Nov 2004 | BR |
102 04 281 | Aug 2003 | DE |
10 2006 030 118 | May 2007 | DE |
10 2007 022 935 | Apr 2009 | DE |
20 2009 000 245 | Apr 2009 | DE |
0 668 221 | Aug 1995 | EP |
0 826 598 | Mar 1998 | EP |
0 826 599 | Mar 1998 | EP |
0 717 710 | Apr 1999 | EP |
0 915 026 | May 1999 | EP |
0 706 473 | Aug 1999 | EP |
0 803 445 | Nov 2003 | EP |
1 834 893 | Sep 2007 | EP |
1 839 898 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1 839 899 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1 857 275 | Nov 2007 | EP |
1 873 078 | Jan 2008 | EP |
1 445 209 | May 2008 | EP |
1 918 094 | May 2008 | EP |
1 935 636 | Jun 2008 | EP |
1 968 020 | Sep 2008 | EP |
1 992 476 | Nov 2008 | EP |
2 230 190 | Sep 2010 | EP |
2 292 524 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2 754 375 | Apr 1998 | FR |
2 916 157 | Nov 2008 | FR |
2 943 322 | Sep 2010 | FR |
2241230 | Aug 1991 | GB |
2 273 492 | Jun 1994 | GB |
2 298 391 | Sep 1996 | GB |
2004-315035 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2000-255621 | Sep 2009 | JP |
10-0711073 | Apr 2007 | KR |
10-0840926 | Jun 2008 | KR |
10-0886955 | Mar 2009 | KR |
PA05002905 | Feb 2006 | MX |
2010001867 | Apr 2010 | MX |
194965 | Nov 1992 | TW |
8902402 | Mar 1989 | WO |
9308084 | Apr 1993 | WO |
9702997 | Jan 1997 | WO |
0066450 | Nov 2000 | WO |
20051100186 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2006018556 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006021291 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2006099260 | Sep 2006 | WO |
2006108853 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2007109113 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2008027029 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2008027036 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2008039350 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2008125784 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2008125785 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2008148176 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2010115811 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2011039067 | Apr 2011 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080231922 A1 | Sep 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60896820 | Mar 2007 | US |